The PSYCHO-SOCIAL IMPACT of opting for QUANTUM LOGIC instead of BINARY LOGIC
OVERVIEW:
The world we live in; i.e. the world of our sense-experience of inclusion in a transforming relational continuum, is knowable only by inference since we cannot ‘get outside of it’ to capture an understanding of it as an independently existing world. This means that what we SEE OUT THERE as LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES as we speak of in such terms at THE TOWN that is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products is only a SUBSTITUTE REALITY or SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE for the INEFFABLE WAVE-FIELD REALITY WE AND EVERYTHING IS INCLUDED IN. Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE FRAGMENTS the transforming relational continuum of our sense-experience of inclusion therein, reducing and simplifying the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE to LOCAL, EXPLICIT FRAGMENTS such as ‘the TOWN’ which we give a life of its own to with GRAMMAR as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products, as if we are an external observer enjoying a voyeur view on which we can overlay a MEASURING GRID of the WORLD we are observing AS IF FROM THE OUTSIDE. If we can see it from the outside, it is not the reality we are included in, but is instead a SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which WE ARE MISSING. We must there be careful with our use of language based representations because if they are voyeur views, they are not view of REALITY since REALITY is something we are included in.
In this context, we may remind ourselves of Nietzsche’s point about the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR whereby we establish a language based description of a NAMING-instantiated notional LOCAL THING IN ITSELF (a BEING) such as ‘the TOWN’ and we conflate this with the second error of GRAMMAR to impute LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT to the FIRST ERROR of the NAMING-INSTANTIATING of a notional THING-IN-ITSELF.
This language-based REPESENTATION is NOT of REALITY but of a LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY where the THING in our FOCAL POINT, we are using GRAMMAR to equip with POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.
NOTA BENE: THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” (i.e. as in ‘the TOWN that does its own GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING) in our real-life sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao. The LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta DOES NOT EMPLOY THE ABSTRACT NOTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING IN THEIR LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS. E.g. their languages fashion representations in terms of “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX as in TRANSFORMATION as Heraclitus maintained was the actual sense-experience affirmed REALITY and in a reality wherein everything is in flux, there are no LOCAL AUTHORS of ANYTHING.
While it is CORRECT to say, in keeping with the all-including transforming WAVE-FIELD, that ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, it is INCORRECT to say ‘the TOWN is GROWING, or DEVELOPING or PRODUCING something’… which imputes the POWER OF LOCAL AUTHORING to the TOWN as within the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR language structure. This is INCORRECT and it brings forth REPRESENTATIONS that purport to be REPRESENTATONS OF REALITY when they are actually REPRESENTATIONS of an ABSTRACT SUBSTITUTE REALITY, the SUBSTITUTE REALITY OF A BINARY LOGIC based LOCAL TOWN THAT IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING THINGS, as if it were INDEPENDENT of the SPACE it is included in. And by our language based construction of such SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE, we SHUT OUT FROM OUR MENTAL ACCESS, the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY of TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.
WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT REMAIN UNDER THE PSYCHOLOGICAL INFLUENCE OF OUR BINARY LOGIC based SUBTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS that, as Bohm is saying, is the source of SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA as in the COVID 19 PATHOGEN ATTACK (there are no PATHOGENS in QUANTUM REALITY, only IMBALANCES). PATHOGENS are BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION that DO NOT EXIST in our relational world where there is relational BALANCE and IMBALANCE but NO LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORING AGENTS and thus no LOCAL, EXPLICIT GOOD and EVIL AUTHORING AGENTS. We can be CHANNELS or LIGHTNING RODS through which RELATIONAL DISSONANCE can ‘surface’ but THERE ARE NO LOCAL AUTHORS of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, GOOD, BAD or INDIFFERENT. WE ALL SHARE INCLUSION IN A WAVE-FIELD world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” The FRAGMENTED SUBSTITUTE REALITY COMMISSIONED BY LINGUISTIC DOUBLE ERRORS OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR IS, as SCHROEDINGER OFFERS, ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ (APPEARANCES).
* * *
We might ask ourselves, Why do we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS choose to THINK and SPEAK in terms of CONTINENTAL DRIFT (where the continents are understood as LOCAL and EXPLICIT MALE ASSERTING objects) .. rather than SEAFLOOR SPREADING (where the ocean basins are understood as NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ACCOMMODATING holes).
We find, if we reflect on this, that SEAFLOOR SPREADING implies CIRCULATION since if we focus on the SPREADING, there must be new material being extruded from the interior of the Earth sphere to fill in behind the spreading which involves older material subducting. Because the surface area of the sphere of the Earth remains the same size, there must be a SUBDUCTION ZONE here older material on the surface SINKS INTO THE BODY of the Earth to ‘make way’ for the OUTWELLING extrusion of material that adds material on top of the pre-existing surface. What we are comparing here in CONTINENTAL DRIFT (which concerns “LOCAL, EXPLICIT” CONTINENTS) vis a vis SEAFLOOR SPREADING which is comprised of EXTRUSION and SUBDUCTION are understandings with DIFFERING DIMENSIONALITY since the CONTINENTAL DRIFT is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and SUPERFICIAL while SEAFLOOR SPREADING IS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and TRANSFORMATIVE (everything is in flux, as was the observation of Heraclitus and as is supported by Modern physics with its WAVE-FIELD understanding of reality wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD).
HOW DOES LANGUAGE DEAL WITH THESE DIFFERENT UNDERSTANDINGS?
ANSWER: “DIFFERENTLY” (i.e. different language architectures have been developed which different groups of people have embraced which deliver differing views of ‘reality’. The power of different languages to put us (psychologically) into different “realities” is the finding of Benjamin Whorf, and it has been controversial because many of us prefer to understand that there is only ONE reality and it is the reality that our social group ‘lives in’. Thus for the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT the very different reality understood by indigenous aboriginals can be ignored because, “as everyone knows” (so say the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS), we are all INDEPENDENT HUMAN BEINGS who live on a spherical planet which moves about within a collection of planets, stars and material bodies within a vast and ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.
[Note that language can be a trickster here. For example, there is the clustering of ants, perhaps where a drop of honey induces a resonant gathering-scattering or ‘clustering’ but our WESTERN CULTURE language architecture tends to REDUCE such resonance features to local things-in-themselves; i.e. ‘the CLUSTER’ and to employ GRAMMAR to synthetically SIMPLIFY this nonlocal and implicit resonance feature, and reducing it with the NAME ‘CLUSTER’ to a notional LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF with GRAMMAR-given powers of AUTHORING actions and development as in ‘the CLUSTER is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING changes in the local terrain’. What is in sense-experience reality a resonance based CLUSTERING is given the NAME “CLUSTER” which suggests LOCAL BEING and conflated with GRAMMAR into a DOUBLE ERROR based LOCAL AUTHORING AGENT deemed independent of the overall landscape it is included in. While the CLUSTERING is in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, the CLUSTER is an INDEPENDENTLY EXISTING FEATURE notionally with ITS OWN POWERS of AUTHORING ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of products and developments (ant-hills and ravaged plants etc.) that is INDEPENDENT thanks to its notional inclusion within an absolute empty space of infinite extent. This is a MAJOR LANGUAGE-BASED REMAKE OF “REALITY” wherein we have RE-CAST the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT resonance feature of ‘clustering’, as a LOCAL and EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF, notionally with ITS OWN (grammar-given) POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of things.
CAN YOU IMAGINE WESTERN CULTURE PEOPLE FALLING FOR THIS WAY OF THINKING so that instead of letting ourselves be moved by the natural relational resonances we share inclusion in, we SPLIT OURSELVES OUT (notionally/psychologically) OF THE ALL-INCLUDING RELATIONAL MATRIX and organize into what has the APPEARANCE of CLUSTERS FORMED BY THE INTELLECTUAL INTENTIONS OF THE CONSTITUENTS, so that we mistakenly see our ‘SOCIAL COLLECTIVE’ or CLUSTERING as having OUR OWN POWERS of AUTHORING “OUR OWN” GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of mounds etc. In this case we LET GO OF our sensitive tuning in to the relational dynamics we share inclusion in, as we re-orient to our own INTELLECTUAL AUTHORING POWERS which are one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY, DROPPING OUT the OUTSIDE-INWARD INDUCTIVE BEHAVIOUR SHAPING INFLUENCE of the relational dynamics we are situationally included in which is innately included in the mode of activity wherein we are letting ourselves be moved by the natural relational resonances we share inclusion in.
In this case, we become, as members of such resonance based groups (clustering) SELF-CONSCIOUS as a GROUP so that we LET GO of our natural resonance based mode of UNDERSTANDING wherein we are letting the NONLOCAL dynamics of the unfolding relational continuum ORGANIZE our LOCAL actions and developments, and SET OUT INSTEAD TO DELIBERATELY, INTELLECTUALLY ORGANIZE OUR ACTIONS ON THE BASIS OF INTELLECT-DRIVEN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES, as if OUR CLUSTERING was FULLY AND SOLELY the INTELLECTUAL INVENTION of us MEMBERS OF THE CLUSTER BUILT FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSOLIDATING OUR (MALE ASSERTING) POWERS OF ACTION, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION SO AS TO ACHIEVE SOME INTELLECTUAL PURPOSE. This constitutes the SUBSTUTING of a new INTELLECTUALLY DRIVEN SUBSTITUTE RELITY in place of the relational resonance reality of our sense-experience wherein we are removing the resonance basis substituting INTELLECTUAL INTENTION.
LANGUAGE CAN THUS PLAY TWO VERY DIFFERENT ROLES IN SOCIAL ORGANIZING which can be seen in the example of CLUSTERING wherein there is a general OUTSIDE-INWARD INDUCTIVE BEHAVIOUR-SHAPING INFLUENCE as in RESONANCE based organization that manifests as CLUSTERING. Meanwhile, SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS [see can lead to INVERTING THE AUTHORING SOURCE of ORGANIZATION from RESONANCE based HABITAT-INHABITANT dynamic attunement to INTELLECTUAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES DRIVEN ACTIONS which leads to DELIBERATE CLUSTER FORMATION, setting aside the natural RESONANCE based organizing. NOW “WE MAKE THE CLUSTER (ELEPHANT) DANCE in the now familiar WESTERN CULTURE form of ORGANIZATION such as ‘the TOWN’, ‘the NATION’, ‘the CORPORATION’ all of which are imputed to have THEIR OWN LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, where we as CITIZENS defer to (or pretend to defer to) this INTELLECT DRIVEN BEHAVIOURAL DIRECTION, putting it into UNNATURAL PRECEDENCE over letting ourselves be moved by the natural relational resonances we share inclusion in]. NOTE THAT what is going on here is the equivalent of SIMPIFYING the WAVE-FIELD dynamic by notionally removing the FEMALE CONJUGATE of the WAVE-FIELD which in effect puts us into a new SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is MALE-ASSERTING ONLY as in an INTELLECTUALLY DIRECTED SOCIAL COLLECTIVE.
SO, WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have opted for the SUPERFICIAL representation based on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT where the is composed of LOCAL, EXPLICIT things that are set in motion by “APPLIED FORCES” as is the REASON-ing in Newtonian physics which was celebrated for its LOCAL and EXPLICIT CLARITY AND PRECISION which very much CONTRASTS with the SEAFLOOR SPREADING alternative which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, being comprised of circulation by way of EXTRUSION and SUBDUCTION which means that since everything is in flux, there is no SPHERE thing-in-itself that is AUTHORING the extrusion and subduction, there is only EXTRUSION-SUBDUCTION that is the SPHERING which is dynamic and a kind of RESONANCE FEATURE or WAVE-FIELD FEATURE suggestive of an ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, and here our understanding must go beyond “THE EARTH” as a “LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF” with the MALE ASSERTING PROPERTY suggested by Copernicus who claimed that it was SIMPLER to say ‘the EARTH TURNS ROUND’ than to come up with a cosmology that was itself dynamic and included EARTHING as part of a larger and more comprehensive system. SO WHY NOT ASSUME the BINARY LOGIC arrangement wherein THE EARTH TURNS ROUND and ‘BACKFILL’ the rest of space that CONTAINS the EARTH with ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS OF INFINITE EXTENT? The SIMPLIFICATION that this BINARY LOGIC based solution gives was the reason why Copernicus chose to put a stake in the ground and say THE EARTH TURNS ROUND. That is, that is as SIMPLE AS IT GETS, thanks to the BINARY LOGIC which enables the ABSOLUTE SPLIT between the MATERIAL OBJECT of ‘the EARTH’ and the IMMATERIAL EMPTY SPACE in which its CONTAINER, wherein the CONTAINER and CONTENT are MUTALLY EXCLUDING.
Heraclitus and Modern physics and the indigenous aboriginal culture, opted instead for the LESS SIMPLE but more SENSIBLE UNDERSTANDING which employs the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein the ALL-INCLUDING SPACE IS NOT EMPTY BUT FULL OF ENERGY, WAVE-FIELD ENERGY, so that the MATERIAL FORMS are understood as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD which defines the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein the MATERIAL FORM is a CONDENSATION of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.
The understanding is NO LONGER the BINARY LOGIC relation between ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE and ABSOLUTE MATERIAL OBJECTS, … but is now the QUANTUM LOGIC relation between the ENERGY-FILLD WAVE-FIELD PLENUM and the MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD PLENUM. This reality embodies he QUANTUM LOGIC “BOTH/AND” relation instead of the BINARY LOGIC “EITHER/OR” relation. In the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation, the material form as the condensation of the all-pervading wave-field is “BOTH” the WAVE-FIELD “AND” the material form within the wave-field, and now we have a WORLD VIEW which does not FRAGMENT ‘reality’ in the BINARY LOGIC based MATTER and VOID SPLIT of Newtonian science. Instead, in this Modern physics QUANTUM LOGIC understanding, which was already the understanding of indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, … THERE IS NO BINARY LOGIC MATTER AND SPACE SPLIT, there is instead a QUANTUM LOGIC MATTER and FIELD UNITY
GUESS WHAT!
THIS CHANGES THE SPECIFICATIONS FOR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, EXPOSING A FUNDAMENTAL SHORTFALL IN WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE; i.e. the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE GIVEN TO BINARY LOGIC WHICH, AS NIETZSCHE POINTED OUT, IS THE FOUNDATION FOR THE ABSTRACT NOTION OF “LOCAL AUTHORING” AS CREATED WITH THE “DOUBLE ERROR” of “NAMING” and “GRAMMAR”.
This abstract concept of LOCAL AUTHORING has proven to be PROBLEMATIC in that it is the source of FRAGMENTATION of reality, or rather, the PSYCHOLOGICAL CREATION of a SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which FRAGMENTATION is given a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which IMPUTES LOCAL AUTHORING which is the source of FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE language-based representations.
EXAMPLE OF BINARY LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE: THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products (as if in an absolute empty space of infinite extent)..
In Modern physics compliant indigenous aboriginal language-based representation, we would INSTEAD USE A QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION such as THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE where FIGURE and GROUND are put back together and we no longer have a notional SPLIT OUT, INDEPENDENT THING-IN-ITSELF “TOWN” that we have to use GRAMMAR to mobilize as a LOCAL AUTHOR of ITS OWN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, … as part of a general scheme to construct an entire WORLD made out LOCAL, EXPLICIT, MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES that, thanks to GRAMMAR, are shown to be moving about on their own and interacting with other such INDEPENDENT LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES, that together fashion a MATERIAL REALITY wherein the MATERIAL FORMS are notionally situated within AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, setting up a BINARY LOGIC based “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” wherein MALE-ASSERTING AGENTS are fully and solely responsible for constructing a REALITY DYNAMIC.
IN SHORT, MODERN PHYSICS RESTORES THE UNITY IN THE WORLD THAT WE INTUITIVELY PERCEIVE WHICH IS COMING FROM OUR INCLUSION IN THE WAVE-FIELD IN WHICH MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD SO THAT THERE IS NO BINARY LOGIC SPLIT BETWEEN MATERIAL FORMS AND ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, because that EMPTY SPACE is now understood as an ENERGY-FILLED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD, giving a FULLY INTEGRATED REALITY. NO MORE SPLITTING APART OF MATERIAL FORMS because MATERIAL FORMS ARE NO LONGER THOUGHT OF IN THE BINARY LOGIC BASED TERMS OF INDEPENDENT MATERIAL FORMS IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE but are now understood in Modern physics as they have been in indigenous aboriginal cultures as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD. SPACE IS NOW “WAVE-FIELD” WHICH INCLUDES “MATERIAL FORMS” which are CONDENSATIONS of the “WAVE-FIELD” and instead of a BINARY LOGIC (EITHER/OR) SPLIT between MATERIAL FORMS and EMPTY SPACE, we have a QUANTUM LOGIC (BOTH/AND) RELATION between MATERIAL FORMS and the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.
EXAMPLE OF QUANTUM LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE; THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.
* * *
WHY ARE WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS CONTINUING TO USE BINARY LOGIC-INFECTED LANGUAGE WHICH BLOCKS US FROM ARTICULATING OUR EXPERIENCE IN QUANTUM LOGIC TERMS?
BINARY LOGIC IS BUILT INTO OUR COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES, for example with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as in the above example “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products”. The words ‘the TOWN is GROWING” are exemplary of the DOUBLE ERROR which implies LOCAL JUMPSTART AUTHORING of actions and developments. In order for the TOWN to GROW, it must be INDEPENDENT of the SPACE it is situated in, and this INDEPENDENCE of MATERIAL OBJECTS and SPACE is BINARY LOGIC based, and it contrasts with the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND representation/understanding such as ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ where the TOWNING is understood to be an included feature within the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and there is no sense that TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE where TOWNING is a feature within the transforming landscape, can be confused for A “TOWN” that exists and GROWS and DEVELOPS and AUTHORS PRODUCTS as a THING-IN-ITSELF that inhabits an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.
TAKING STOCK OF WHAT IS GOING ON HERE AND WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE.
WESTERN CULTURE BASED SOCIAL SYSTEMS CONTINUE TO FLY-WHEEL FORWARD MAKING THE SAME FRAGMENTATION MISTAKES AS HAVE BEEN MADE FOR CENTURIES BY US WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, but things are changing because we are getting better at doing BINARY LOGIC based stuff such as CONSTRUCTION and CULTIVATING THE LAND where we focus single-mindedly on the MALE ASSERTING ASPECT WHILE WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON IS TRANSFORMATION that we are INCLUDED IN.
WE, the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE withs its GOVERNMENT AND CORPORATION DIRIVEN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS AND PRODUCTION of stuff is all part of the SUBSTITUTE REALITY and this SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is BINARY LOGIC BASED and of which we speak in the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based terms, … AS IF THE WORLD WAS A WORLD OF INDEPENDENT MATERIAL THINGS, SOME OF WHICH HAVE LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS (e.g. HUMAN BEINGS, NATIONS, CORPORATIONS) so that we TALK ABOUT THEM as if they are the LOCAL AUTHORS of actions and developments, but all the while we are included in this world of TRANSFORMATION wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX and which is QUANTUM LOGIC based which means that those things we have been talking about as if they are INDEPENDENT BEINGS in our LANGUAGE-BASED BINARY LOGIC WORLD of MATERIAL THINGS and VOID , … are now acknowledged to be CONDENSATIONS within the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.
PAUSE: HOLD IT RIGHT THERE: It’s alright for INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS and Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta ADHERENTS to move forward with this QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of reality where we say that ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ where the understanding is that everything is included in the ONE WAVE-FIELD or GREAT MYSTERY, … but WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have got a lot of changes to take care of in SHFTING from a BINARY LOGIC based REALITY where everything is deemed INDEPENDENT such as HUMANS and NATIONS and migrate into the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL version of reality where everything is related (Mitakuye Oyasin) where there is no such thing as INDIVIDUAL AUITHORING of actions and developments (where the THIEF, MURDERER and RAPIST are coming from relational dissonance in the social collective that is the PROBLEM of the SOCIAL COLLECTIVE which must come together in a HEALING CIRCLE to resolve the relational dissonance that is the source of THEFT, MURDER and RAPE, rather than making the BINARY LOGIC based JUDGEMENT of the notionally INDEPENDENT INDIVIDUAL as EITHER GUILTY OR INNOCENT and ELIMINATING the GUILTY ONES so as to PURIFY the COMMUNITY which is seen as multiplicity of INDEPENDENT BEINGS some of which may be GUILTY of AUTHORING THEFT, MURDER or RAPE while the rest are PRESUMED INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.
This is the BINARY LOGIC based interpretation of reality, while in the QUANTUM LOGIC interpretation there is BALANCE and IMBALANCE in the relational dynamic of the social collective that can engender a LIGHTNING ROD THIEF, RAPIST OR MURDERER and this LIGHTNING ROD is a CONDUIT of relational TENSIONS that have not been addressed by the social collective, … the recipe for social harmony coming from the overall web of relations in the community (mitakuye oyasin) and NOT ROOTED IN THE INDIVIDUAL PERSON, NATION, CORPORATION. No, the relational dissonance that emerges in BINRY LOGIC STRIFE as between TWO PERSONS or TWO NATIONS (RUSSIA and UKRAINE) has roots in the social matrix and it makes no sense to identify and seek to ELIMINATE a LOCAL AUTHOR. The LOCAL AUTHOR ABSTRACTIONS, as Nietzsche pointed out derives from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR. In reality, what we MISIDENTIFY AS THE LOCAL AUTHOR is the CONDUIT through which relational tensions in the social collective UNLOAD.
* * *
The PSYCHO-SOCIAL IMPACT of opting for QUANTUM LOGIC instead of BINARY LOGIC is significant as this note suggests.
There is lots more to this ‘translation’ that is needed for us (a larger portion of the social collective) to accept the OVER-SIMPLICITY of BINARY LOGIC and to shift gears to implement a social dynamic based on QUANTUM LOGIC, the logic of relational BALANCE rather than BINARY LOGIC based PURIFICATIONISM which seeks to REMOVE THE BAD LOCAL AUTHORS OF EVIL. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN INDEPENDENT BEING in QUANTUM LOGIC, there are only CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD which are ALL RELATED and where the recipe for social harmony is to accept that WE ARE ALL RELATED and to orient to the cultivating of relational harmony.
IT IS CRAZY to assume that everyone is INDEPENDENT and that the problem of strife (theft, murder rape) is coming from BAD independent beings so that the cure is to incarcerate or eliminate the BAD ONES leaving only GOOD ONES as in a strategy of PURIFICATION which comes from BINARY LOGIC thinking where people can be understood as EITHER GOOD OR BAD, … rather than being seen as members of an interdependent relational matrix wherein tensions develop and lightning rods become conduits of tensional release as fits the relational understanding of the social matrix as supported by Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal culture, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, and yours truly.
* * *
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.