The GYNOCIDE of WESTERN CULTURE in RELATING the PHYSICAL to the PSYCHICAL
FORWARD: The Mephistophelian Gynocide of our Android Western Language Cult.
“GYNOCIDE” refers to the ELIMINATING of the FEMALE CONJUGATE in developing representations of the all-including transforming relational continuum. While the WILDERNESS OPENS UP TO ACCOMMODATE the CONJUGATE GROWTH of cultivated lands, this ANDROGYNOUS TRANSFORMATION is habitually, in our WESTERN CULTURE, PRESENTED in the ONE-SIDED, MALE-ASSERTIVE TERMS of “GROWTH”, as if the ACCOMMODATING FEMALE OPENING that makes such GROWTH possible “NEVER OCCURRED” . INSTEAD of architecting our language to capture the sense-experience affirmed ANDROGYNOUS TRANSFORMATION, we are SUBSTITUTING for the FEMALE ASPECT of ANDROGYOUS TRANSFORMATION, an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT (Euclidean Space). The result is that our Common Average European language based representations of reality are serving up a one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE SUBSTITUTE REALITY which we are now using as our WESTERN CULTURE OPERATIVE REALITY.
In simple terms; there is no such thing as GROWTH in a WAVE-FIELD, there is only TRANSFORMATION.
* * *
In 1914, Ernst Mach wrote the classic ‘The Analysis of Sensations, and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical’, … and there is a lot more understanding in Mach’s “Analysis that YET MADE ITS WAY INTO THE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN language based representation of reality.
Mach assumed that ‘we’ (Western Culture Adherents) were well on our way to bringing the PHYSICAL and the PSYCHICAL into connective meaningful CONFLUENCE.
As it turns out, this unifying of the PSYCHICAL and PHYSICAL understanding has STALLED and we are BULLING AHEAD with the PHYSICAL, launching satellites into Earth Orbits and many other weird and “wonderful” physical enterprises, regarding the PHYSICAL world as INDEPENDENT of the PSYCHICAL.
The science of psychology is auxiliary to physics. The two mutually support one another, and it is only when they are united that a complete science is formed. From our standpoint, the antithesis of subject and object, in the ordinary sense, does not exist.” — Ernst Mach. ‘The Analysis of Sensations and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical,
CURRENTLY, we are suffering from RISING FRAGMENTATION in our physical dynamics, the divisions into notional INDEPENDENT NATIONS and CORPORATIONS etc. such that each of these NOTIONALLY INDEPENDENT ENTITIES, … WHICH ARE IN NO WAY ‘INDEPENDENT’ in our sense-experience reality of inclusion in an all-including WAVE-FIELD dynamic, … are the source of GROWING FRAGMENTATION, … first of all PSYCHOLOGICAL FRAGMENTATION where we PROCLAIM THE INDPENDENCE of NATIONS and HUMANS and CORPORATIONS, … in BLATANT IGNOR-ANCE of the sense experience reality wherein all things are related (as in the indigenous aboriginal aphorism MITAKUYE OYASIN or ALL THINGS ARE RELATED) which is AFFIRMED BY MODERN PHYSICS.
GROWING FRAGMENTATION IN THE WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC …. STARTS IN THE PSYCHE
DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE ARE NOT AFFIRMED BY SENSORY EXPERIENCE BUT ARE BEING AFFIRMED IN OUR LANGUAGE-STIMULATED ABSTRACTING INTELLECTUAL PSYCHE and in a global social collective wherein everybody has chosen to agree that INDEPENDENT NATION STATES are a useful thing to AGREE that they ACTUALLY EXIST so that we should BEHAVE AS IF THEY DO EXIST, we have been steadily generating LOCK-IN-BY-HIGH-SWITCHING-COSTS. That is, we have instituted REWARDS AND RECOGNITION and then again PUNISHMENTS and DENIGRATION “BASED ON THE NOTIONAL GRAMMAR-GIVEN LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING WE HAVE GIVEN TO THE NAMING-INSTANTIATED THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES”
TALK ABOUT “FRAGMENTATION”!
But FRAGMENTATION is given THE FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in the WESTERN CULTURE WORLD VIEW and it leads on to the ABSTRACT ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING NOTIONS such as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION which ECLIPSE and SUBSTITUTE FOR the sense-experience affirmed reality of the all-including TRANSFORMING RELAITONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao.
Its NOT AS IF this FRAGMENTED SUBSTITUTE REALITY were simply a supportive TOOL to be used as a PSYCHOLOGICAL SPRINGBOARD to get from language based constructs to INPRESSIONS of sense-experience reality, this FRAGMENTED SUBSTITUTE REALITY is HI-JACKING our OPERATIVE REALITY to the extent that we are actually behaving as if the PSYCHICAL as stimulated by our LANGUAGE-BASED FRAGMENTATION of REALITY were the PHYSICAL REALITY. This is NOT what Mach had in Mind, and this DELUSION of a FRAGMENTED WORLD wherein LOCAL AUTHORING in the form of GROTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION are TAKEN TO BE REAL, is putting us, as a WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, … ON A BUSTRIP TO HELL, … THE HELL OF PROGRESSIVE FRAGMENTATION.
* * *
TIME TO REVISIT AND REFLECT ON WHAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE BEEN DOING WITH LANGUAGE AND ITS IMPACT ON THE PSYCHE.
Let’s start with the MALE and FEMALE, noting that within a VALLEY, we can have MULTIPLE MALE PEAKS and the curved surface of the EARTH can topologically be understood by INVERTING it so that MOUNTAINS are all pointing inward within a spherical HOLE or FEMALE SPACE. In this viewing stance, we can more readily see that the FEMALE HOLE is the PRIMARY REALITY and it constitutes a space that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT wherein the MOUNTAIN PEAKS are LOCAL and EXPLICIT features WITHIN THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, as is actually the case in a world wherein MATTER is a CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD.
INTUITIVELY, we sense that the indigenous aboriginals and Modern physics are right on target with the claim that EVERYTHING IS RELATED because while those PEAKS can be spoken of in terms that capture them as LOCAL and EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES, the are in the larger, more inclusive FEMALE SENSE, relational features within the FEMALE LANDSCAPE.
We know that just because Medieval tribes could construct hilltop villages and declare them to be LOCAL, EXPLICIT and INDEPENDENT KINGDOMS, such ABSTRACT, INTELLECTUAL DECLARATIONS of INDEPENDENCE IN NO WAY OVERCAME THE INNATELY NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT REALITY OF INCLUSION WITHIN THE FEMALE HOLE-SPACE.
The TOPOLOGY of HILL and VALLEY affords us THESE TWO CHOICES FOR GROUNDING OUR REALITY, … THE REALITY OF THE LOCAL, EXPLICIT, INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE OF EACH OF MULTIPLICITY OF PEAKS, or THE REALITY OF AN ALL-INCLUDING VALLEY HOLE WITHIN WHICH MULTIPLE SUBMERGED PEAKS ARE RISING UP NOT AS INDEPENDENT ENTITITES BUT AS IMPLICIT FEATURES WITHIN THE ALL-INCLUDING FEMALE VALLEY.
ONLY IF WE PRETEND THAT THE FEMALE VALLEY WHICH IS THE MOTHER OF THOSE MALE PEAKS “DOES NOT EXIST” (as when we psychologically INVENT A SUBSTITUTE REALITY IN WHICH, FOR THE ALL-INCLUDING FEMALE, WE SUBSTITUTE “AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT AKA EUCLIDEAN SPACE”, DO WE “LET LOOSE” FRAGMENTATION in terms of a MULTIPLICITY OF MALE ASSERTING FORMS.
WHAT ARE REFERRING TO HERE, IT IS THE SUBSTITUTING OF RECTANGULAR SPACE FOR SHERICAL SPACE WHERE THE SURFACE OF THE SPHERE IS CONCEIVED OF A FLAT SURFACE PUNCTUATED BY A MULTIPLICITY OF “LOCAL” “MALE” FEATURES. THIS “FRAGMENTATION” BASED ON A REDUCTION TO MALE-ONLY TOPOGRAPHY AS IN A FLAT EUCLIDEAN SPACE REDUCES THOSE ANDROGYNOUS FEATURES OF MALE PEAKS WITHIN THE FEMALE HOLE OR ‘BASIN’, SO A MULTIPLICITY OF INDEPENDENT MALE ASSERTING FEATURES WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.
OK, THIS ABSTRACT REDUCTION OF SPHERICAL SPACE, THE SPACE OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE, TO THE ABSTRACT EUCLIDEAN SPACE, THE ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, CREATES A NEW SUBSTITUTE REALITY FEATURING A MULTIPLIFITY OF LOCAL, EXPLICIT FORMS WHICH ARE NO LONGER “SEEN” WITHIN THE “UNIFYING REALM” OF THE ALL-INCLUDING FEMALE BASIN OR HOLE.
As long as the MALE ASSERTING HLLS were included within the FEMALE VALLEY, there was no FRAGMENTING into a multiplicity of LOCAL, EXPLICIT, INDEPENDENT ENTITIES, but once we bring into play INTO OUR INTELLECTUAL LANGUAGE BASED REALITY CONSTRUCTING, the notional ABSOLUTE FIXED EMPTY and INFINITE RECTANGULAR ‘EUCLIDEAN” SPACE as a SUBSTITUTE REALITY displacing our sense experience of inclusion in SPHERICAL SPACE, we move ourselves, PSYCHO-LOGICALLY, “INTO” this new “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” where our language and grammar talk, supports a FRAGMETED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, which DEEP-SIXES our SPHERICAL SPACE WHEREIN the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE “INCLUDES” those forms which in EUCLIDEAN SPACE were LOCAL and EXPLICIT, but now in SPHERICAL SPACE are including within the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT of the FEMALE CONTAINING SPACE, a QUANTUM LOGIC understanding as accords with the understanding of MATTER as a CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIIELD.
Within a SPHERICAL SPACE (imagine this basic topology in terms of male knobs intruding into the interior of a hollow sphere, from the inner wall of the sphere. While we could DESCRIBE these inward-pointing MALE-knobs as a LOCAL, EXPLICIT MULTIPLICITY of SEPARATE ENTITIES, we know that in reality, they are just features within the FEMALE HOLE so that the primary reality is that of FEMALE UNITY in which the MALE MULTIPLICITY is only APPEARANCE and it would be a MISTAKE to FRAGMENT REALITY by treating, WITH THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR, the MALE FEATURES as if they were LOCAL, EXPLICIT, INDEPENDENT ENTITIES, … but that is THE COMMON HABIT of us WESTERN CULTUER ADHERENTS and it follows from our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, which is not a FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE such as the indigenous aboriginal language architectures.
In the FLOW-based language, the FEMALE WAVE-TROUGH and the MALE WAVE-PEAK are ONE ANDROGYNOUS UNITY, BUT IN WESTERN CULTURE, WE ARE GUILTY OF GYNOCIDE. We perform this GYNOCIDE with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, as Nietzsche has pointed out;
Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531
What we END UP WITH in our DOCTORED UP LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is an ALL-MALE, NO-FEMALE WORLD VIEW. This is where the talk of the DEA ABSCONDITA comes in because WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, THANKS TO OUR GYNOCIDAL ACTION ON LANGUAGE, HAD ‘DEEP-SIXED’ THE FAMALE CONJUGATE IN THE ANDROGYNOUS DYNAMIC OF THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, AND WE ARE RETAINING ONLY THE MALE ASSERTIVE CONJUGATE AS IN THE ONE-SIDED ALL-MALE CONCEPTS OF ‘GROWTH’, ‘DEVELOPMENT’ AND ‘PRODUCTION’. DON’T BOTH LOOKING AROUND FOR MENTION OF ‘TRANSFORMATION’ BECAUSE TRANSFORMATION IS ANDROGYNOUS AND THANKS TO WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED GYNOCIDE, THE GYN HAS BEEN removed from the ANDROGYNE that is INHERENT IN TRANSFORMATION wherein WAVE-TROUGH and WAVE-PEAK are only ONE and NOT TWO.
OF COURSE IT ‘SIMPLIFIES” REPRESENTATION TO DROP UT THE FEMALE ASPECT BECAUSE IT IS THE FEMALE ASPECT THAT IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT (RELATIONAL) WHICH MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO CAPTURE IN A LANGUAGE LIKE OUR COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGAUGES, WHICH GIVE A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT.
LET’S FACE IT, WE CAN’T ‘GET TO’ THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT WHEN WE GIVE A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT. BECAUSE THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT “FRAGMENTS” OUR “PREPRESENTATION” OF SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, AND SINCE THIS FRAGMENTATION IS GIVEN THE FOUNDATIONAL ROLE, GETTING BACK THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT IS AKIN TO THE CHALLENGE OF PUTTING HUMPTY-DUMPTY BACK TOGETHER AGAIN AFTER A FALL FROM THE WALL.
WHAT DO WE DO?
It is evident that WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are struggling in the wake of act of GYNOCIDE and are now faced with the problem of HEALING FRAGMENTATION that we have BUILT INTO OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that imputes LOCAL AUTHORING wherever we want to ‘throw together a NAME and some GRAMMAR’, as in ‘the TOWN IS GROWING”. NO ITS NOT, … THE LANDSCAPE IS TRANSFORMING and we can GO WITH BOTH because they are INCOMPATIBLE. the TOWN IS GROWTING’ implicitly INVOKES the SUBSTITUTE REALITY featuring ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE EUCLIDEAN SPACE to GET RID OF THE FEMALE CONJUGATE. This is an act of GYNOCIDE but we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have done it, as Copernicus said, to achieve SIMPLIFICATION in our language architecting approach, and believe you me, the FEMALE CONJUGATE is a real problem to capture in language because it just goes on and on and on, being innately NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational), whereas the MALE is nicely behaved in being LOCAL and EXPLICIT, allowing us to construct REALITY, or at least a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALIY, with a LOCAL FRAGMENT and build our representation up from there.
The PROBLEM NOW IS that we have been using this FRAGMENTATION BASED LANGUAGE for centuries and now that we are coming to the conclusion that it has a basic INADEQUACY in that it FRAGMENTS reality and thus serves us up REPRESENTATIONS OR REALITY IN A PIECEMENAL FASHION (which we find very useful for simplistic communications even in NOT REALLY ‘REALITY’). THE PROBLEM IS NOW, THAT THIS FRAGMENTATION IS BECOMING A SERIOUS ISSUE but we keep PROMOTING IT because we have BUILT IT INTO OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE. For example, we use language to promote what we call GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION when WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON, AS OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE ATTESTS, IS TRANSFORMATION. So when we hear a lot of talk about the GROWTH of PRODUCTION of Wheat and Corn and the like, WE HEAR NOTHING AT ALL IN THE SAME BREATH, ABOUT THE LOSS OF WILDERNESS DIVERSITY. HOW’S THAT FOR AN ALL-MALE-NO-FEMALE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE?
AS THE READER CAN HERSELF ATTEST, WE HAVE GROWN VERY COMFORTABLE WITH TREATING AS ‘REAL’, THESE UNREAL ABSTRACT CONCEPTS OF ‘GROWTH’, ‘DEVELOPMENT’ AND ‘PRODUCTION’, so much so that we have developed a GLOBAL ECONOMY based on BELIEF in the PSEUDO-REALITY OF THE UNREAL ABSTRACTIONS of “GROWTH”, “DEVELOPMENT” and “PRODUCTION”. HEY! WE DON’T LIVE IN A FLAT SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT WHICH IS WHERE “GROWTH”, “DEVELOPMENT” AND “PRODUCING” LIVE, … WE LIVBE IN A SPHERICAL SPACE WHERE THE ONLY POSSIBLE DYNAMIC IS TRANSFORMATION WHICH IS ANDROGYNOUS, WHERE THE WILDERNESS DIVERSITY ‘SHRINKS’ IN CONJUGATE RELATION WITH THE “GROWTH” OF CULTIVATED LAND, THESE BEING CONJUGATE ASPECTS OF THE ONE DYNAMIC OF TRANSFORMATION OF THE ONE-FINITE SPHERICAL SPACE WE SHARE INCLUSION IN, WHICH WE USED TO UNDERSTAND PRIOR TO THE ADVENT OF WESTERN CULTURE CAE LANGUAGE BASED GYNOCIDE.
TOGETHER WITH GYNOCIDE COMES FRAGMENTATION BECAUSE AN ALL-MALE ASSERTIVE SUBSTITUTE REALITY HAS NO FEMALE ENCOMPASSING ‘GLUE’ SINCE WE HAVE SUBSTITUTED IN ITS PLACE AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT (EUCLIDEAN SPACE).
GOODBYE ‘TRANSFORMATION”, HELLO “FRAGMENTATION”.
That brings us up to where we now are, WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS NOT HAVING TAKEN the advice of Ernst Mach to reconcile the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical’ but, instead, having continued to put intellectual abstracting into an unnatural primacy over sense-experience informing of actions. What this is doing is having us PRETEND that GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION are REAL even through they are ONLY the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTIVE CONJUGATES which are MISSING the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, THESE TWO CONJUGATES TOGETHER CONSTITUTING THE ONE ALL-INCLUDING ANDROGYNOUS UNITY aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao.
WE ARE CURRENTLY STUCK in FRAGMENTATION MODE because of our HUMPTY-DUMPTY predicament wherein we have thoroughly INFUSED INTO OUR SOCIAL DYNAMIC, the ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTIVE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is FRAGMENTING NOT ONLY OUR SOCIAL DYNAMIC BUT IS AT THE SAME TIME FRAGMENTING OUR PSYCHE. We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are now in the habit of BELIEVING in OUR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING, which is the ROOTSTOCK of FRAGMENTATION, and this is held in place by SWOLLEN MALE-ASSERTIVE EGO.
WHAT IS OUR WAY OUT? The “WE” who have been pretending we are LOCAL AUTHORS of actions and developments (thanks to the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR) when the reality is, instead, that we are INCLUDED in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.
The ‘WAY OUT’ is to GO NATIVE and to overtly DROP our political support for promoting belief in the IMAGINARY ‘INDEPENDENT NATIONS’ and ‘INDEPENDENT HUMAN BEINGS’, and this is not so much of a problem for those who are not ‘well-positioned’ within the popular WESTERN CULTURE ‘HOUSE OF CARDS” GAME PLAY based on the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, but it is much harder for those with RAGING EGOS born of THEIR BELIEF in THEIR OWN LOCAL AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.
LETS GET REAL! Just because someone gets energized to play LEADER and to credit ONESELF with the POWERS OF LOCALLY AUTHORING SOCIAL COLLECTIVE ACTION, this notion of LOCAL AUTHORING IS DELUSION. A more realistic understanding of the dynamics of a social collective comes from considering our participating within FREEWAY TRAFFIC where the notion of “OUR AUTHORING OF ACTIONS” goes ‘out the window’ because we are included WITHIN a complex relational dynamics, and YES, WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE in the dynamic but because we are INCLUDED IN IT, our movements are RELATIVE so that we can slow down or speed up or swerve so as to OPEN UP HOLES (the FEMALE ASPECT) that others can move into which can improve the harmony in the flow (or conversely infuse dissonance) but the movement in a FLOW like this is ANDROGYNOUS such that the OPENING OF HOLES induces MALE ASSERTIVE ACTION which is in CONJUGATE RELATION to the FEMALE OPENING OF THE HOLE. The OPENING OF HOLES is a NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT (RELATIONAL) PHENOMENON and is in INNATE PARTNERSHIP with MALE ASSERTIVE ACTIONS and WE CAN”T SPLIT THESE TWO APART BECAUSE THEY ARE CONJUGATE ASPECTS OF THE ONE DYNAMIC OF RELATIONAL TRANSFORMATION.
WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, MEANWHILE, have the habit of IMPOSING AN ABSTRACT EUCLIDEAN SPACE FRAMING, and what this SYNTHETIC UNREAL MENTAL ABSTRACTION DOES is to invent an abstract FIXED, EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE CONTAINER to serve as an IMAGINARY FRAME that enables us to conceive inhabitants within that IMAGINARY FRAME as HAVING THEIR OWN ABSOLUTE MOVEMENTS, which then enables us to use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to construct representations featuring NOTIONAL “LOCAL AUTHORS OF THEIR OWN MOVEMENTS”.
The ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE RECTANGULAR EMPTY SPACE REFERENCE FRAME IS A ‘TRICK’ that we use to CREATE the IMPRESSION of the INDEPENDENCE of MOVEMENT as portrayed using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.
Note that IN SENSE EXPERIENCE REALITY where the LOCAL MATERIAL FORM is a CONDENSATION OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX APART FROM THE ‘NAME’ we IMPOSE on FLUID FEATURE in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.
The NAME we give to the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, e.g. PLEASANTVILLE, will persist, suggesting that PLEASANTVILLE is a “THING” that PERSISTS, bringing to mind Korzybski’s ‘the MAP is NOT the TERRITORY’ in the sense that the PLEASANTVILLE is a SYMBOL superimposed on the transforming relational continuum wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX. Thus, to say that PLEASANTVILLE IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services it the use of language to construct a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and REMOVED FROM THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM in the manner that that one might place a transparent plastic sheet over a recording of the TRANSFORMING WEATHER PATTERNS on EARTH as seen from an orbiting satellite. On the transparent plastic film is the MAP showing the NAMES of the GEOGRAPHICAL FEATURES, the latter being features within the transforming relational continuum that the GEOGRAPHER IDENTIFIES as EXPLICIT FEATURES with names and outlines (limits).
WAIT A MINUTE, THE COUNCIL OF FOUR-LEGGEDS, WINGED and SLITHERING ONES HAS CONVENED THEIR COUNCIL TO DISCUSS THE OPENING OF A LARGE WOUND IN THE WILDERNESS DIVERSITY BY WAY OF “TOWNING” IN THE WILDERNESS. THE BIG NEWS IS WHAT IS HAPPENING TO THE WILDERNESS THIS HOLE CONTINUES TO OPEN UP WITHIN IT. BUT AT THE SAME TIME THERE IS A MEETING OF THE TOWN COUNCIL AND THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN ALMOST AS IF IT WERE SITUATED IN NOTHING OF CONSEQUENCE; I.E. AS IF THE TOWN WAS A LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF THAT WAS ITSELF ‘GROWING’ AS IF IT LIVED WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT!
THIS TOWN DOES NOT EVEN EXIST AS A LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF, IT IS INSTEAD A FEATURE WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE AND IT IS AN INSEPARABLY INCLUDED ASPECT OF THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE AND IN NO WAY A SEPARATE LOCAL EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF, … ALL OF THAT ABSTRACTION BEING THE CONCOCTION OF A SIMPLIFYING LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE. FURTHERMORE, BECAUSE THERE IS NO TOWN AS A THING-IN-ITSELF, THERE CAN BE NO ‘GROWTH OF THE TOWN’, … THERE CAN ONLY BE TRANSFORMATION OF THE LANDSCAPE IN WHICH “TOWNING” IS AN “APPEARANCE” CAPTURED IN LANGUAGE USING THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR WHICH CREATES AN IMAGINARY SEPARATE ENTITY THAT, … WHERE THE HELL DO WE PUT THE DAMN THING NOW THAT WE HAVE CHOPPED IT OUT OF THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM…. HOW ABOUT WE INVENT AN EMPTY CONTAINER, A MATHEMATICAL ABSTRACTION LIKE AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT? IN THIS CASE, WE CAN PLOP THE ‘TOWN’ RIGHT IN THERE WITHOUT HAVING TO SPLICE AND STITCH ALL ROUND THE EDGES OF THE TOWN AS IF IT WERE A ‘FRANKEN-TOWN’.
WE JUST PLOP IT DOWN INTO THE EMPTY CONTAINING SPACE AS WE MIGHT WITH THE ORGAN OF AN ANIMAL WE ARE DISSECTING IN BIOLOGY AND WE SAY ‘THIS HERE IS A “TOWN”’, AND THEN WE GO ON TO DISCUSS ITS PARTS (STREETS, AVENUES, BUILDINGS BRIDGES) UNTIL WE HAVE ENOUGH TO TALK ABOUT THAT WE HAVE FORGOTTEN ABOUT THE REALITY THAT IS IN FACT AN “INSEPARABLE FEATURE WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM”.
SAY, ISN’T THIS ABSTRACT TOOL OF THE EUCLIDEAN SPACE CONTAINER A HANDY THING FOR DISENCUMBERING OUR DISCUSSION OF A RELATIOINAL FEATURE WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM. WE JUST CHOP OUT THE PIECE OF INTEREST TO US AND PLOP IT DOWN INSIDE THE ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE CONTAINER WHERE WE FOCUS ON THE ‘FRAGMENT’ AS IF IT WERE A THING-IN-ITSELF. IN THIS WAY WE CAN CLEAVE OUT THE TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE AND FOCUS IN ON THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT ‘TOWN’ AND ITS STREETS AND AVENUES AND LOCAL BUILDINGS AND MONUMENTS AS IF IT EXISTED INDEPENDENTLY OF THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.
As with the clustering of ants that are continually gathering and scattering attracted by falling drops of honey from an overhead bees nest, the scattering and gathering or ‘clustering’ giving the appearance of “A LOCAL CLUSTER” that is “THE AUTHOR” of its own “GROWING and SHRINKING” over time, but where THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A CLUSTER WITH ITS OWN LOCAL AUTHORING POWER, that being nothing other than APPEARANCES or in Schroedinger’s language “SCHAUMKOMMEN’. which is what we get since EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX’.
* * *
O.K. WHO AMONG US WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS IS GOING TO BUY INTO ANY OF THIS STORY OF GYNOCIDE?
Nietzsche and Bohm gave it THEIR BEST SHOT, … and what has changed? ALMOST NOTHING, it appears.
The GYNOCIDE continues to be IGNORED because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have built a functional ALL-MALE-NO-FEMALE SUBSTITUTE REALITY featuring the one-sided ALL-MALE-ABSTRACTION abstractions of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION which WALLPAPER OVER the reality of TRANSFORMATION which is not so simple to capture in language. Why , because as Copernicus pointed out in using the simplification ‘The EARTH TURNS ROUND’, we can use BINARY LOGIC to SIMPLIFY reality so that we only have to deal with the OPPOSITES of MATTER and EMPTY SPACE because its having to address with language the QUANTUM LOGIC wherein MATTER is a CONDENSATION of FIELD (formerly known as SPACE), where the difficulty lies.
To speak in terms of something EITHER existing OR not existing SIMPLIFIES THE HELL OUT OF LANGUAGE ARCHITECTING because it gets rid of the FEMALE that complicates the nice LOCAL EXPLICIT qualities of the MALE ONLY REALITY with its need for invoking the all-encompassing NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.
Sure, in doing some GYNOCIDE to tidy things up, we have issues such as the fact that by ground our understanding in the all-including NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT FEMALE SPACE, the islands of the LOCAL AND EXPLICIT ARE GIVEN MEANING AND DO NOT HAVE TO ‘STAND ON THEIR OWN’, BUT ONCE THE INTEGRATING FORCE OF THE ALL INCLUDING FEMALE CONTAINING IS REMOVED BY THE SUBSTITUTING OF THE ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE EUCLIDEAN SPACE, WE HAVE FRAGMENTED REALITY SO THAT WE HAVE TO DEAL WITH THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT AS A FRAGMENTED COLLECTION OF THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES, LIKE NATIONS THAT HAVE ‘DECLARED THEIR OWN INDEPENDENCE’ WHICH IS TOTAL BULLSHIT, BUT HAS PROVED POPULAR ANYHOW DUE TO EGO-APPEAL.
So, the meanwhile, it looks like we are going to deploy the continuance of GYNOCIDE and stay with the highly fragmentative one-side MALE-ASSERTIVE SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which imputes LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, all of which is one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE as, for example, with GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION which is all LOCAL and EXPLICIT and which displaces BUT ONLY IN THE WESTERN CULTURE CONDITIONED PSYCHE, TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and which is affirmed by our sense-experience of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD.
* * *
FOOTNOTE: The above essay begins with a reference to Ernst Mach and to his observation that our understanding of the world has to bring into connective confluence, PHYSICS and PSYCHOLOGY due to their interdependence;
The science of psychology is auxiliary to physics. The two mutually support one another, and it is only when they are united that a complete science is formed. From our standpoint, the antithesis of subject and object, in the ordinary sense, does not exist.” — Ernst Mach. ‘The Analysis of Sensations and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical,
The suggestion is there implicitly that WE ARE the WORLD we are looking out at. In Schroedinger’s words;
“The world is given to me only once, not one existing and one perceived. Subject and object are only one. The barrier between them cannot be said to have broken down as a result of recent experience in the physical sciences, for this barrier does not exist.” – Erwin Schroedinger
The point is that the WAVE-FIELD is ALL-INCLUDING and that matter is a condensation of the WAVE-FIELD it is included in. This is the QUANTUM LOGIC relation. So it is, also, with the relation between INHABITANT and HABITAT. These are NOT TWO SEPARATE ONTOLOGICAL ENTITIES … BUT CAN INSTEAD be understood in QUANTUM LOGIC terms wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE; i.e. INHABITANT and HABITAT are ONE.
The TERM GYNOCIDE points to the ERROR of BINARY LOGIC that is used to CONSTRUCT MALE-ASSERTIVE DYNAMICS ON THEIR OWN, as if transpiring within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE containing space. This INVENTING of ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE Euclidean SPACE is THE PRICE THAT MUST BE PAID for BREAKING MALE ASSERTING “OUT OF THE ANDROGYNOUS CONJUNTIO OPPOSITORUM” and employing it separately in its own right..
But MALE ASSERTIVE ACTIONS OUTSIDE OF THE ANDROGYNOUS CONJUGATE, do not exist in SENSE EXPERIENCE REALITY. DOES NOT, IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, EXIST IN ITS OWN INDEPENDENT RIGHT. LANGUAGE-based REPRESENTATIONS OF MALE ASSERTIVE ACTION ARE ABSTRACTIONS that derive from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as Nietzsche has shown. That is, we can “SAY” that ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING’, … but WHEN WE DO, we are implying that such actions are transpiring WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT and this is GYNOCIDE, the ‘DOING AWAY WITH’ of the FEMALE CONJUGATE by way of the CREATION of a SUBSTITUTE REALITY featuring BINARY LOGIC based MALE ASSERTIVE AGENTS operating in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT. THIS IS INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION. It does not exist in SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY.
Why do we use it? We use it for the same reason that Poincaré gives for our use of the phraseology ‘the EARTH turns round’ which similarly implies BINARY LOGIC as in the EITHER/OR relation between MATTER and SPACE that imputes the SEPARATE and INDEPENDENT existence of MATTER and SPACE. The trouble is, such simplifications as we make in CLASSICAL PHYSICS continue to come back to HAUNT US, as Kepler has pointed out.
As regards the academies, they are established in order to regulate the studies of the pupils and are concerned not to have the program of teaching change very often: in such places, because it is a question of the progress of the students, it frequently happens that the things which have to be chosen are not those which are most true but those which are most easy. And by that division in things which makes different people form different judgements, it so happens that certain people are in error contrary to their own opinion.” – Johannes Kepler, ‘Harmonies of the World’
MATTER and SPACE are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE ONLY WHEN WE TREAT OF THEM WITH BINARY LOGIC. In sense experience reality, MATTER is a CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD , a relation that requires QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.
We, the majority of the social collective continue to support MISTAKEN concepts, chief among them being BINARY LOGIC and this is putting us on a BUSTRIP TO HELL We have the knowledge to ‘get off the bus’ but our problematic way of thinking is LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS and the challenge is to break that “LOCK-IN”.
* * *
APPENDIX I: A REVIEW OF THE BASIC CONCEPT OF “GYNOCIDE”
We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are the perpetrators of GYNOCIDE and we are paying a heavy price for it; i.e. our current BUSTRIP TO HELL.
WHAT IS GYNOCIDE?
GYNOCIDE is where we design a language architecture that is ALL MALE AND NO FEMALE, as we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE DONE.
Lao Tzu has reminded us that the FEMALE is primary and the MALE secondary even though the TWO are bound together as ONE as described in Mephistopheles et l’Androgyne by Mircea Eliade. NEVERTHELESS, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS haVE SPLIT THE TWO APART and ELIMINATED THE FEMALE CONJUGATE.
What is called into question in our WESTERN CULTURE MODE OF MODELING REALITY is our PENCHANT FOR STUNTED BINARY LOGIC BASED CONSTRUCTIONS.
WHY ‘STUNTED’? Because in SPHERICAL development the dimensionality of the taking on of form is innately greater than the taking on of form in FLAT SPACE. In other words, the FORMING is CONJUGATE or ANDROGYNOUS in SPHERICAL SPACE. In FLAT SPACE, where there is infinite capacity for FLAT-SPACE GROWTH, a cultivated area can GROW in a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING MANNER. In other words, where there is a GROWING FIELD on a FLAT PLANE of INFINITE EXTENT, the GROWTH progresses in a one-sided LINEARLY INCREASING fashion without the complication of being IN CONJUGATE partnership with a SHRINKING WILDERNESS such that the overall QUALITY of the LANDSCAPE is TRANSFORMING with the simultaneous REDUCTION of WILDERNESS CONJUGATE with the GROWTH of CULTIVATED LAND.
BINARY LOGIC is SIMPLE LOGIC that is RATIONAL which means FLATSPACE based. On the surface of a FLAT SPACE, THERE IS NO FEMALE CONJUGATE “BACK-PRESSURE” like that from pushing back the WILDERNESS GROWTH that associates with the ADVANCING of the CULTIVATED LAND. THIS CONJUGATE PUSHBACK of the SHRINKING WILDERNESS to the GROWTH of CULTIVATED LAND (we must continue to keep weeding the cultivated land or the WILDERNESS will RECLAIM what we have cleared) is something REAL that we would not be faced with if we REALLY DID LIVE IN A FLAT SPACE as our language claims that we do because we are in the habit of employing FLATSPACE LANGUAGE where the MALE ASSERTING ACTION is PRESENTED AS IF IT WERE REAL; e.g. the GROWTH of CROPLANDS, where what is REALLY GOING ON is TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE which is ANDROGYNOUS and NOT like GROWTH wich is RATIONAL or one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE, words fashioning REPRESENTATION suggestive of one-sided linear expansion of area on a FLAT SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT.
In the spherical space (space on the surface of sphere), together with the GROWTH of cultivated are, there is a CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE of WILDERNESS.
* * *
BINARY LOGIC is thus STUNTED (expresses only the linear abstraction and can’t deliver the full conjugate relation) and cannot possible deliver expressions/representations of NON-BINARY “QUANTUM” REALITY.
So, as long as our language-based representations are STUNTED by dependency on BINARY LOGIC, they are GOING NOWHERE REAL!
This MORNING, I woke up with the word LARK on my mind and hadn’t a clue where it came from but was at the same time playing the game WORDLE and in pondering this word LARK, thought of the associated word KARL which led me to think of KARL MARX and then to pondering WHAT I DIDN”T LIKE about Karl Marx’s theories which included the expression “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need”.
What I “DON’T LIKE” about this aphorism is that it is ‘salted’ with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which SYNTHETICALLY IMPLIES LOCAL AUTHORING. In other words, that aphorism is based on the notion of LOCAL AUTHORING which is THE PROBLEM as I see it, and as Nietzsche and Bohm saw it.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING. WE LIVE WITHIN A TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao.
So, Karl Marx completely passed over questioning the legitimacy of LOCAL AUTHORING and started working on the social problems of the day in terms of ENTITLEMENT which assumes that THERE IS SUCH A THING AS “PRODUCTION”.
My view is that GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION are DOUBLE ERROR based ABSTRACTIONS that have no place in the real world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE where we all share inclusion in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao.
So, KARL Marx was on a LARK that sought to explain the UNREAL concept of PRODUCTION, which he took TO BE REAL as in the aphorism …
“From each according to his ability, to each according to his need”.
THIS IS ALL MALE, NO FEMALE, … or in other words, it is abstraction wrought by GYNOCIDE since it is focused on PRODUCTION which is the MALE component of TRANSFORMATION wherein the FEMALE CONJUGATE has GONE MISSING.
As we know, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have architected a language that GETS RID OF THE FEMALE CONJUGATE because the FEMALE CONJUGATE is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and goes on forever, while the MALE CONJUGATE is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and we can spit it out cleanly, simply, and efficiently, and thus we BYPASS being bogged down like the indigenous aboriginals with their flow-based language that NEVER GETS TO THE POINT and says stuff like THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE where EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, … so that there is no FINALITY or EXPLICITNESS in such ‘relational’ propositions.
How much CLEARER it is, then, when we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS SAY; ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING, increasing quantities of people, products and services! NOW WE’RE ESTABLISHING SOMETHING LOCAL and EXPLICIT and MEASURABLE, something SOLID that we can QUANTIFY in both a MATERIAL and TEMPORAL sense, as in THE GROWTH OF THE NUMBER OF WIDGETS WE ARE PRODUCING PER DAY (per UNIT of TIME).
By keeping our sights focused on PRODUCTION, we are no longer distracted by our sense-experience of being included in a TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (where our feeding on it is part of the transforming we share inclusion in.
When we speak of our PRODUCTION OF OIL, … there is no thought of the FEMALE HOLE developing within the earth by our extraction of the oil, and when the foundations of our houses start to crack and split open, we scratch our heads as to what is going on, since PRODUCTION is a word that HAS US THINKING IN ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTIVE TERMS, whereas, IN REALITY, there is NO SUCH THING AS ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTIVE ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.
As Nietzsche pointed out, the ABSTRACT NOTION OF LOCALLY AUTHORED PRODUCTION derives from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR as in expressions like ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’, …. SURE, SURE and PIGS can FLY. If we can prove that there is such a thing as a CONTAINING SPACE that is EMPTY, ABSOLUTE and INFINITE, then we prove that GROWTH of some MATERIAL ENTITY WITHIN IT is possible, but what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are doing is simply ASSUMING THAT THERE IS SUCH A THING AS AN EMPTY ABSOLUTE SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, … we call it EUCLIDEAN SPACE, which is really an abstract intellectual GEOMETRY rather than a sense-experience affirmable ‘REALITY’.
BUT I TELL YOU WHAT, … BELIEF IN THE EXISTENCE OF THAT ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT IS WHAT SUPPORTS THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR BASED ABSTRACTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING, which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are USING ALL THE TIME IN OUR BINARY LOGIC GRAMMATICAL STRUCTURES which equip us for the constructing of LOCAL, EXPLICIT entities such as LOCAL TOWNS that, so we say, ‘GROW LARGER AND MORE POPULOUS AND PRODUCTIVE’.
HEY, ANYBODY SEE THE LANDSCAPE OPENING UP A HOLE FOR THE EXPANDING TOWNING? NO? WHY NOT? Is it because we are so accustomed to simply DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE CONJUGATE in our SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS?
Because we have REPLACED SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY with SUBSTITUTE REALITY featuring an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of infinite extent, locally populated by EXPLICIT material entities. The EMPTY SPACE is ‘INVISIBLE’ because it is a vast EMPTINESS and one can’t expect to see or feel and ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT because there are not even any limiting edges to it. It is the INFINITE CONTAINER that houses the LOCAL and EXPLICIT material stuff.
And as we can see, this SIMPLIFIES our language architecture in a major way because it sets us up for the us of BINARY LOGIC wherein this EMPTY SPACE is ‘EITHER’ occupied by a material entity, “OR” is NOT occupied by a material entity, and we can FORGET about the EMPTINESS because there is nothing to say about it, and we we only have o concern ourselves with the MATERIAL ENTITIES which are LOCAL and EXPLICIT.
Compare the SIMPLICITY of this WESTERN CULTURE language-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY with the complexity of the indigenous aboriginal SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMING REALITY wherein the FORMS that can be seen are like TURBULENCES in a FLUID FLOW such that the WHORL or TURBULENCE in the flow BOTH IS and IS NOT the FLOW and we have to use the BOTH IS AND IS NOT LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the INCLUDING MEDIUM is also the FORMS WITHIN THE MEDIUM. So this is QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM which includes the dynamic forms that lie within it such that THERE IS NO HARD BINARY LOGIC BREAK BETWEEN FIGURE and GROUND within the flow.
We can say that, like the whorl in the flow, these are not TWO SEPARATE THINGS as in a BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION but simply ONE FLOW that INCLUDES DYNAMIC FORMINGS such as WHORLS that we DISTINGUISH by their different APPEARANCE but which are nevertheless INCLUSIONS in the FLOW. LIKEWISE, n the context of the electromagnetic field, the material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD so THERE IS NO BINARY LOGIC SPLITTING APART OF FIGURE and GROUND, there is instead a QUANTUM LOGIC relation as with the WHORL in the FLOW where the WHORL “IS” THE FLOW in the same RELATIONAL sense as MATTER is a CONDENSATION of the ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE-FIELD.
THE FEMALE CONTAINER AND THE MALE CONTENT ARE ONLY ONE. As Schroedinger puts, it , SUBJECT and OBJECT are only one and the sense of TWO is SCHAUMKOMMEN aka APPEARANCE and that APPEARANCE of FIGURE and GROUND as TWO SEPARATE THINGS is NOT AFFIRMED BY OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE, but what IS AFFIRMED is the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of FIGURE and GROUND as ONE.
* * *
HERE’s the WESTERN CULTURE RECIPE FOR SIMPLIFYING OUR LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATION OF REALITY;
PRETEND THAT THE FEMALE CONJUGATE IS SIMPLY A PASSIVE CONTAINING SPACE, AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, THIS GIVES US AN PASSIVE CONTAINER FOR OUR MALE-ASSERTIVE CONTENT SO THAT WE CAN IMPUTE FULL AND FREE INDEPENDENCE TO OUR MALE ASSERTIVE FIGURES ALLOWING US TO ARCHITECT LANGUAGE THAT IS FAR SIMPLER THAN IF WE HAD TO STRUGGLE WITH REPRESENTING THE MALE-FEMALE CONJUGATE RELATION AS WITH QUANTUM LOGIC. QUANTUM LOGIC EMBODIES THE ‘BOTH/AND’ RELATION AS IN THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT (WHERE EVERYTHING IS IN CONTINUING RELATIONAL FLUX)
IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, WE STRIP OUT THE FEMALE CONJUGATE AND SUBSTITUTE ‘ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS OF INFINITE EXTENT’ SO WE CAN FOCUS EXCLUSIVELY ON THE MALE ASSERTIVE WHICH IS LOCAL AND EXPLICIT AND DELIVERS MUCH CLARITY AND SUCCINCTNESS TO OUR SIMPLE, RATIONAL PROPOSITIONS. FOR EXAMPLE, WE CAN SAY ‘HE IS THE AUTHOR OF SUCH AND SUCH ACTION’ OR ‘HE IS NOT THE AUTHOR OF SUCH AND SUCH ACTION’ BECAUSE OUR CHOICE OF LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE HAS ELIMINATED THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT AKA ‘THE FEMALE CONJUGATE’. WHICH HAS A REAL BLURRINESS-INFUSING IMPACT.
To say that THE TOWN IS GROWING and/or THE HUMAN IS GROWING is the VOYEUR VIEW, but to say there is TOWING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM or there is HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM acknowledges that, as SCHROEDINGER observes, SUBJECT and OBJECT are only “ONE”.
BUT to speak of SPACE and as a VAST EMPTINESS in place of FIELD that is the FEMALE CONJUGATE TO MATTER, is GYNOCIDE.
YES, we can CLAIM THAT OUR GYNOCIDE HAS SUBSTANTIALLY IMPROVED THE CLARITY AND PRECISION OF OUR LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY SUBSTITUTE REALITY. In the case where there is a social collective that gets tensioned up so that one of the participants ‘loses it’ and becomes the LIGHTNING ROD through which the social collective based buildup of tensions VIOLENTLY DISCHARGES, the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR identifies a LOCAL and EXPLICIT AUTHOR of the action using the language and grammar supported concept wherein the LIGHTNING ROD “IS THE LOCAL AUTHOR”. WITH THIS RADICAL LANGUAGE BASED SIMPLIFICATION IN HAND, we don’t have to mess around with trying to attribute AUTHORING RESPONSIBILITY to all those involved in the tensioned relational web, because our DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR furnishes us with a LOCAL, EXPLICIT PSEUDO-AUTHOR, so, thanks to the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, we make the LIGHTNING ROD THAT IS A “CONDUIT” WITHIN THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, APPEAR TO BE A LOCAL AUTHORING SOURCE.
THUS we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS don’t have to go through all the fooforah that the indigenous aboriginals do in gathering together the whole community for some healing circle rituals designed to eliminate relational tensions building within the relational social matrix that is the deeper source of the lightning rod ZAP, a source that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and lies deeper that the SUPERFICIAL LOCAL EXPLICIT AUTHOR CONCEPT, the latter being much SIMPLER to IMAGINE and DEAL
For sure, it is far SIMPLER to formulate remediating action based SIMPLY on presenting the LIGHTNING ROD ZAPPING as if it were a LOCALLY, EXPLICIT ACT as in ‘HE DID IT’, without sullying the BINARY LOGICAL INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY STATUS of the many members of the social collective, as is accepted within the indigenous aboriginal culture. So, in our WESTERN CULTURE APPROACH, by gathering up and eliminating “THE USUAL LIGHTNING RODS” deemed the JUMPSTART AUTHORS of VIOLENCE, the relational social tensions go unaddressed and WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are trained to HOLD ON TO OUR RELATIONAL TENSIONS WITHOUT BEING THE FIRST TO VENT THEM since the LIGHTNING ROD that IS FIRST TO VENT “WILL TAKE THE HIT” while the social collective masses will all be given a CLEAN BILL OF HEALTH, since the BINARY LOGIC based assessment sees the LIGHTNING ROD NOT SIMPLY AS THE CONDUIT FOR THE RELEASE OF TENSIONS THAT HAVE BUILT WITHIN THE RELATIONAL MATRIX OF THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, BUT AS THE ACT OF A LOCAL EXPLICIT AUTHOR.. This contrasts with the HEALING CIRCLE approach that is designed to dissipate the relational tensions that are understood to be the ‘real’ deeper-lying source’ of the violence.
When it comes to a CHOICE between RESTORING BALANCE, which is a QUANTUM LOGIC RESPONSE, or GOING AFTER THE LIGHTNING RODS whose actions imply the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT (relational) buildup of tensions, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS orient to the ELIMINATION OF THE LIGHTNING RODS because this entails the LOCAL and EXPLICIT which is much SIMPLER and easier to CAPTURE IN LANGUAGE and to ADDRESS WITH FORCE, … far simpler than having to resolve the diffuse nonlocal and implicit (relational) tensions of IMBALANCE. Once the LIGHTNING ROD SHOWS HIMSELF, it is out there in our face and we can deal with it without disturbing the masses of what our WESTERN CULTURE conceive of as ‘innocent citizens’.
What we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have learned is that it is possible to construct a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on regarding individuals as LOCAL AUTHORS OF THEIR OWN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, whether GOOD OR BAD, because in this approach, it is far SIMPLER (because local and explicit) to REWARD AND ENCOURAGE GOOD WORKS by REWARDING AND ENCOURAGING THE LOCAL AUTHORS OF THE GOOD WORKS, and likewise it is far SIMPLER (because local and explicit) to PUNISH and DISCOURAGE BAD WORKS by PUNISHING and DISCOURAGING the LOCAL AUTHORS of those BAD WORKS.
Now, JUST IMAGINE HOW DIFFICULT THE JOB OF REWARDING AND PUNISHING BECOMES IF WE HAVE TO ASSUME A NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT SOURCE TO EVENTS SUCH THAT THOSE THROUGH WHOM ACTIONS TRANSPIRE ARE MERELY THE ‘LIGHTNING RODS’ THROUGH WHICH THE TENSIONS IN THE SOCIAL-RELATIONAL MATRIX ARE DISCHARGING!
GOODBYE LOCAL, EXPLICIT INDIVIDUAL ORIENTED PURIFICATIONISM, …. HELLO RELATIONAL SOCIAL COLLECTIVEE REBLANCING. OR IN OTHER WORDS, GOODBYE WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGICAL MORAL JUDGEMENTS AND PURIFICATION BY ELIMINATING BAD AND RETAINING GOOD, … HELLO INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL STYLE CULTIVATING OF RELATIONAL HARMONY WHILE AT THE SAME TIME ATTENUATING RELATIONAL DISSONANCE (THESE TWO ARE REALLY ONLY ONE AS IN A COINCIDENTIA OPPOSITORUM) SO THERE IS NO NEED TO PERFORM ANY PHYSICAL PURIFICATION AS IN ‘YOU ARE BAD, YOU MUST GO’ AND ‘YOU ARE GOOD, YOU ARE WELCOME TO STAY’ WHICH ASSUMES THAT ‘GOOD’ AND ‘BAD’ DERIVE FROM THE INTERIOR OF THE INDIVIDUAL. THE REALITY IS THAT THERE IS ONLY RELATIONAL RESONANCE AND DISSONANCE AND THIS BEING RELATIONAL, IT DEVELOPS BETWEEN AND AMONG THE PARTICIPANTS AND DOES NOT JUMPSTART FROM THE INTERIOR OF THE INDIVIDUAL, A POPULAR WESTERN CULTURE MISIMPRESSION THAT IS BINARY LOGIC BASED ABSTRACTION.
WHEN WE REMOVE BINARY LOGIC, WHICH IS A GROSSLY SIMPLISTIC (UNREALISTIC) ABSTRACTION, AND RESTORE QUANTUM LOGIC WHICH IS A LESS SIMPLE BUT SENSE-EXPERIENCE GROUNDED LOGIC, WE SHALL RESTORE THE ANDROGYNOUS UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY, AND SUSPEND OUR WESTERN CULTURE DYSFUNCTION OF GYNOCIDE .
GYNOCIDE HAS US SUBSTITUTING FOR THE FEMALE CONJUGATE, AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE NOTHINGNESS TO GO WITH THE ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTIVE AND SERVE UP THE ‘LOCAL AND ‘EXPLICIT’ SO THAT WE AVOID HAVING TO DEAL WITH THE ‘NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT’ AS CHARACTERIZES THE FEMALE CONJUGATE.
EVIDENTLY, THE EMBRACE OF BINARY LOGIC IS ALL ABOUT SIMPLIFYING OUR ABILITY TO SHARE CONCEPTS SUCH AS WE DO IN SAYING; ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ WITHOUT REGARD TO ‘REALITY’ WHEREIN THERE IS ‘TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ‘A TOWN’ BECAUSE ONCE WE CHOP OUT THE ‘TOWN’ AND MAKE IT OUT TO BE A LOCAL THING-IN-ISELF, WE ARE NO LONGER GROUNDING OUR REPRESENTATION IN SENSE EXPERIENCE, BECAUSE IN SENSE EXPERIENCE, “TOWNING” IS “INSEPARABLE” FROM THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE-CONTINUUM. ISOLATING THE TOWN AS A THING IN ITSELF IS AKIN TO SHYLOCK’S ‘TAKING A POUND OF FLUSH’, IT MAY BE A NICE CONCISE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT CONCEPT, BUT OUR REAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY IS INEXTRICABLY ROOTED IN THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT.
* * *