WHAT’S WRONG WITH TRUMP and WESTERN CULTURE POLITICS IN GENERAL?

The ANSWER, IN SHORT, IS  “WESTERN CULTURE BLINDNESS TO THE REALITY OF TRANSFORMATION” … and its SUBSTITUTION OF “LOCAL AUTHORING”.

EAST and WEST were ON THE SAME PAGE as far as Lao Tzu and Heraclitus were concerned; i.e. they both believed that EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX; i.e. that REALITY is a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (more recently termed a WAVE-FIELD),  and in this understanding, material forms are understood as APPEARANCES in the manner of WHORLINGS in FLOWING, and thus NOT PHYSICALLY having the BEING and the SHAPES and BOUNDARIES and MOVEMENTS that have been IMAGINED to come with the WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based ‘PACKAGE’ of OBSERVABLE FORMS that appear to be moving WITHIN an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.  BUT THERE IS NO SUCH EMPTY SPACE AND THERE ARE NO SUCH SEPARATE MATERIAL FORMS IN THAT NON-EXISTENT EMPTY SPACE; i.e. THERE IS NO SUCH BINARY LOGIC STRUCTURE, there is only TRANSFORMATION which manifests the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM as describes, for example, CONDENSATIONS in the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (wherein space is FULL, not EMPTY).  This  BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM describes the MODERN PHYSICS CONDENSATIONS OF THE PLENUM UNDERSTANDING OF REAILTY.  It also describes the STRANDS-IN-THE-WEB and CONDENSATIONS-of-the-PLENUM understandings of reailty.  The Indigenous aboriginal people have historically had this same sense of NATURE as ONE , wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) by virtue of being INCLUDED in an INTERCONNECTING and INTERDEPENDING manner, as with CONDENSATIONS in the PLENUM and as with STRANDS in a WEB.

(_{NOTA BENE: the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM is LESS SIMPLE than the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM yet it is COMMON in WESTERN CULTURE to MISTAKENLY employ simple BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM where what is required is less simple BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM.}  

“Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.” —Chief Seattle

The understanding here is that we two-leggeds, the four-leggeds, the winged and crawling ones and all related (mitakuye oyasin means everything is related) as is affirmed by ourselves and all things being CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

WHAT THIS MEANS IS THAT “CHANGE” IS TRANSFORMATION OF THE OVERALL WEB.  IF A STRAND ‘DIES’, ALL STRANDS IN THE WEB ARE IMPACTED, INCLUDING OURSELVES, WHICH IS ANOTHER WAY OF SAYING THAT “THE ONLY REAL DYNAMIC IS TRANSFORMATION” BECAUSE OF THE INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT STRUCTURE OF STRANDS IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WEB AKA CONDENSATIONS IN THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

It is understood in indigenous aboriginal culture that‘everything is related’ (mitakuye oyasin)  which is why there is CARING for all forms of life including the old moss-covered rocks.

“An indigenous aboriginal worldview sees spirit in all living and non-living things, so that rocks, water, and soil all have spirit to them.  Water is considered to be sacred, not only for what it does for the human body and environment but because of this spirit.”

This following TWO PARAGRAPHS are of CRITICAL IMPORTANCE in pointing to the source of WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYSFUNCTION

THE WESTERN CULTURE PROBLEM WITH LANGUAGE: … The WESTERN CULTURE MISTAKEN use of SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM based LOCAL AUTHORING TO EXPLAIN ‘CHANGE’, … IN PLACE OF LESS SIMPLE (QUANTUM ) BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM based TRANSFORMATION, … OBSCURES THE REALITY OF OUR INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, and SUBSTITUTES THE MISTAKEN IMPRESSION OF INDEPENDENT BEINGS INTERACTING WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which leads to, among other ERRORS, THE OVER-SIMPLISTIC PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE of WESTERN CULTURE (the removal of BINARY LOGIC-defined “bad beings” while protecting and proliferating “good beings”) instead OF THE LESS SIMPLE BUT SENSE-EXPERIENCE GROUNDED RESTORATIVE JUSTICE OF INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS AND ADVAITA VEDANTA which comprehends that EVERYTHING IS RELATED and THERE ARE NO “INDEPENDENT BEINGS” and thus THERE ARE NO “LOCAL AUTHORIS”.  RESTORATIVE JUSTICE acknowledges that EVERYTHING IS RELATED and that we are all CONDENSATIONS of the ONE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED TRANSFORMING PLENUM  (as with the BOTH/AND relationship of “STRANDS IN A WEB”) consistent with Modern physics, while WESTERN CULTURE PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE is MISTAKENLY BASED on INDEPENDENT ‘BEING’ based entities who are notionally DISCONNECTED and isolated from one another by a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE. …….. The UNDERSTANDING here is that WE ARE INCLUDED IN THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM WHEREIN EVERYTHING IS INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT (as with STRANDS IN A WEB) AND IT IS ONLY WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSTRUCTIONS that MISTAKENLY SPLIT US APART (in our psyche ONLY) INTO “INDEPENDENT BEINGS” and “INDEPENDENT NATIONS”, thus having a PROFOUND SHAPING INFLUENCE on our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC due to our elevating of the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING in terms of NAMING-instantiated INDEPENDENT BEING that is being used to construct an ABSTRACT PSEUDO-REALITY that has been ADOPTED by WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS as their/our OPERATIVE REALITY, which is the SOURCE of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.  Bohm has spoken of this WESTERN CULTURE PROBLEM of infusing FRAGMENTATION into our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, as follows;

THE RESULTANT WESTERN CULTURE AFFLICTION of BINARY LOGIC based FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.

HOW ABOUT US “HUMANS” which In Modern physics, as also in indigenous aboriginal languistic conceptualizing, are described as “HUMANINGS” that are FEATURES in the all-including TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM and NOT “INDEPENDENT BEINGS” with “OUR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING” in which case we are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as is the nature of FEATURES within the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM, meaning that WE ARE NOT LOCAL and EXPLICIT as in the BINARY LOGIC based WESTERN CULTURE VIEW.

In a FLOW-BASED WORLD, the WHORLINGS IN THE FLOWING”APPEAR” LOCAL and EXPLICIT (i.e. we describe WHAT WE SAY are THEIR SHAPES and THEIR MOVEMENTS but the reality is that THE DIFFERENT FORMS we are looking at and describing ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM or TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM.

APPEARANCES CAN GET THE BEST OF US, particularly if we INCORRECTLY ENCODE THEM INTO LANGUAGE WHERE WE KEEP REPEATING THE SAME ERRORS TO OURSELVES OVER AND OVER AGAIN.  In this regard, WESTERN CULTURE HAS BUILT INTO ITS LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, that there is a polethora of independent beings running around and interacting with one another WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE?  SHOULD WE BELIEVE IT?

NO! NO! NO!   We are INCLUSIONS (CONDENSATIONS) WITHIN A TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka THE WAVE-FIELD.  THE ONLY “REAL” DYNAMIC IS THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION.  THERE IS NO “MOVEMENT OF THINGS”.  THAT IS NO MORE THAN A DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR AS NIETZSCHE SAYS.

THINK “TRANSFORMATION” IN ALL SITUATIONS AND WITH ALL PHENOMENA.  WHEN WE START THINKING IN TERMS OF “THE MOVEMENT OF NAMED THINGS” AND/OR “THE CHANGES TO NAMED THINGS” AND/OR “THE INTERACTIONS OF NAMED THINGS”, .. BACK UP AND INSTEAD SEEK UNDERSTANDING IN TERMS OF TRANSFORMATION, NOT “OF WHAT”, JUST “TRANSFORMATION” BY WAY OF “CHANGING RELATIONS” WITHOUT OPENING THE DOOR TO ‘THINGS-THAT-BE”. RECALL THAT WHORLINGS IN FLOWING CONCERNS SHAPES THAT ARE APPEARANCES and therefore “THEY DO NOT MOVE” because there is no “THEY” and “THEY DO NOT CHANGE” beause there is no “THEY”, and “THEY DO NOT INTERACT” because there is no “THEY”.   (WE NEED A VERB-BASED LANGUAGE WHICH ACKNOWLEDGES THAT EVERY”THING” IS IN FLUX AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THERE ARE ONLY “RELATIONS” as is the meaning of “MITAKUYE OYASIN”.

The NEXT TIME WE CATCH OURSELVES PUTTING TOGETHER LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS WHEREIN “THINGS ARE MOVING AND INTERACTING” .. STOP!  RECALL THAT THERE IS NO RETURN PATH because EXPRESSING THINGS IN BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC, AS IS IMPLIED WHERE THINGS ARE MOVING AND INTERACTING,  REQUIRES THE DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE  aka THE BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM. The INCLUDING MEDIUM is what ties everything together as in the case of CONDENSATIONS of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which are INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT.

BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC based PSUEDO-REALITY IS NOT (SENSE-AFFIRMABLE) REALITY!  SENSE-AFFIRMABLE REALITY IS TRANSFORMATION wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM. THIS “DEMANDS” “the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM”.  ONCE BINARY LOGIC IS INVOKED, ITS A CASE OF; …. “TOTO, I HAVE A FEELING WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE!”.  That is, the BINARY LOGIC based FRAGMENTING OF THE PLENUM INTO SEPARATE PARTS WITH THEIR OWN MOVEMENTS, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION TAKES US OUT OF TRANSFORMING REALITY, PUTTING US INTO A STATIC PSEUDO-REALITY WHEREIN TRANSFORMING IS SUSPENDED WHILE FRAGMENTATION (into one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING) and OBSCURANTISM (by dropping out the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING)… TAKE OVER. 

 * * * * * * * * BEGIN CONVEYING THE ESSENTIAL FINDING IN THIS PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION * * * * * *

_{NOTA BENE: the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM is the less simple  (that BINARY EITHER/OR) LOGIC is needed to convey in LANGUAGE the STRUCTURE of our universe as undestood through our SENSE-EXPERIENCE.  The LESS SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED medium DROPS OUT the female accommodating/enabling conjugate, thus REDUCING our incorporating into our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM (wherein the medium is the energy-charged plenum within which there are condensations), and this SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC pseudo-reality is has become the WESTERN CULTURE mainstream standard for linguistic conceptualiziations. The POPULARIZING of BINARY LOGIC is the source of the DROPPING OUT of the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in LANGUAGE of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and ERRONEOUSLY ELEVATING the BINARY LOGIC based LOCAL and EXPLICIT to an UNNATURAL PRECEDENCE over the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as made possible by the SUBSTITUTING of ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, reducing our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS from their FLUID (NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) basis, to a MECHANISTIC LOCAL and EXPLICIT basis.  Instead of the FLUID ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, which incorporates both the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) TOGETHER WITH THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT (THE GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING TOWN), we THROW OUT the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and substitute ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE as the new CONTAINER for the LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘TOWN THAT IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’.  In other words, we REDUCE the ANDROGYNOUS (WAVE-FIELD based) “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” to the one -sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING”  which is now LOCAL and EXPLICIT, blinding us to TRANSFORMATION “}

 * * * * * * * * END OF CONVEYING THE ESSENTIAL FINDING IN THIS PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION * * * * * *

This is what Schroedinger is intending when speaking of material forms as Schaumkommen (APPEARANCE).  He is saying that we are living in a FLUID REALITY as Heraclitus contended where WHAT APPEARS to be LOCAL and EXPLICIT is, instead, NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.   This is the case with FLOW and the APPEARANCE of FLOW where there are, for example, WHORLINGS IN THE FLOWING, … where the moment we refer to them using our WESTERN CULTURE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR based LANGUAGE, we are hatching a BASTARDIZED PSEUDO-REALITY wherein we are DUMBING DOWN our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY from “TRANSFORMATION” wherein everything is in flux (meaning THERE ARE NO THINGS, only FLOW-FORMS), … to A MECHANISTIC PSEUDO-REALITY.

WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON IS OVERALL, ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION wherein WHAT LOOKS LIKE SOLID FORMS IS “APPEARANCE”, “SCHAUMKOMMEN” that we can compare to WHORLINGS in FLOWING where it is OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that RE-CASTS these WHORLINGS in the FLOWING wherein the overall reality is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (= a WAVE-FIELD) as LOCAL, EXPLICIT “WHORLS” (thanks to BEING based NAMING) notionally WITH THEIR OWN POWER of AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTG) so that we make it appear as if WHORLS are the AUTHORS OF WHORLING and thus we INVENT LOCAL AUTHORING.  Where have we heard this before?. 

Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE INFORMS US THAT WE SHARE INCLUSION IN THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, … SO THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING IS WRONG (it is a DOUBLE ERROR BASED ABSTRACTION), but such REDUCTION of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT is characteristic of WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING because of our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and “GOING WITH” the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE AS IF IT EXISTED “ON ITS OWN”.

TRANSFORMATION IS THE TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD WHICH IS EVERYWHERE AT THE SAME TIME.  I.E. TRANSFORMATION is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT but the FORMS that develop within THE TRANSFORMING are TREATED OF in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE as if they were LOCAL, EXPLICIT, MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES which THEY ARE NOT!   TRANSFORMATION MAY MANIFEST AS WHORLINGS IN FLOWING.  THE WHORLINGS ARE ‘APPEARANCE’ AND WE CANNOT CATCH THEM IN A BUCKET AND PULL THEM OUT AND PUT THEM IN SEPARATE STORAGE because the WHORLINGS are ONLY APPEARANCE which is how TRANSFORMATION MANIFESTS WITHIN A FLOW FIELD.

Indigenous aboriginal cultures, and Modern physics, have the common understanding that we live in a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM where our actions are akin to those of STRANDS IN A WEB; i.e. our actions ARE NOT CONTRIBUTING TO A BOTTOM-UP, LOCALLY INSTIGATED WEB-DYNAMIC. i.e.  our ACTIONS BELONG TO THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM, as if we are included in freeway traffic where our actions can be described in terms of “ALL MY RELATIONS” (mitakuye oyasin) where there is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT DEVELOPMENT of ACTIONS WHICH COME TOGETHER in LOCAL and EXPLICIT PATTERNS, CO-CULTIVATED and INDUCTIVELY PULLED TOGETHER in RELATIONAL RESONANCE/HARMONY innate in the GATHERING-SCATTERING DYNAMIC of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

If RESONANCE is INNATE in NATURE (in the WAVE-FIELD), IT CAN SHAPE THE DYNAMICS WHERE THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ARE PERCEIVED AS LOCAL and EXPLICIT AS IN TRANSFORMATION.  We can see that the TOWNS are GROWING; i.e. we can see these LOCAL, EXPLICIT DEVELOPMENTS, … BUT THAT IS JUST THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ASPECT OF THE TRANSFORMATION that is underway, wherein THERE IS ALSO THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS, and WHILE WE CAN LINGUISTICALLY DESCRIBE AND SPEAK IN TERMS OF THESE TWO THINGS AS IF THEY WERE BINARY LOGIC BASED OPPOSITES, WE INTUIT THAT THEY ARE CONJUGATE ASPECTS OF THE ONE DYNAMIC of TRANSFORMATION.

THERE IS NO BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC RELATION HERE, THERE IS A “QUANTUM” BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM RELATION.  In our approach to UNDERSTANDING, LET’S NOT MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE AS PIAGET MADE, THAT WAS POINTED OUT BY VYGOTSKY; i.e.

Vygotsky, in THOUGHT and LANGUAGE, describes the same RECEPTOR – EFFECTOR  (Female accommodating/enabling — Male asserting/actualizing) combination using the terms SPONTANEOUS concept formation and SCIENTIFIC concept formation, and noting that these are CONJUGATE aspects of a single dynamic;

“Though fundamentally different in nature, the development of scientific and spontaneous concepts represents two sides of the same concept formation”

Vygotsky further points out how, in WESTERN CULTURE EDUCATION, it is COMMONLY TAUGHT that these TWO WAYS OF CONCEPTUALIZING (female accommodating/enabling and male asserting/actualizing) are TWO SEPARATE OPERATIONS when in reality they constitute ONLY ONE WAY OF CONCEPTUALIZING WITH A “COMPLEX” (real + imaginary) structure.

Vygotsky is telling us that WE ARE WRONG if we consider the TWO CONJUGATES, whether we want to call them FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING and MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING or as Vygotsky calls them “the SPONTANEOUS and the SCIENTIFIC”, as SEPARATE and OPERATIVE EACH IN THEIR OWN RIGHT.

“Though fundamentally different in nature, the development of scientific and spontaneous concepts represent two sides of the same concept formation:

Though scientific and spontaneous concepts develop in reverse directions, the two processes are closely connected. … In working its slow way upward, an everyday concept clears a path for the scientific concept and its downward development. It creates a series of structures necessary for the evolution of a concept’s more primitive, elementary aspects, which gives it body and vitality. Scientific concepts, in turn, supply structures for the upward development of … spontaneous concepts toward consciousness and deliberate use. Scientific concepts grow downwards through spontaneous concepts; spontaneous concepts grow upwards through scientific concepts. Vygotsky ‘Thought and Language’, p.194 “

While Vygotsky understands the spontaneous and scientific as conjugates, which agrees with the WAVE-FIELD structure of the world, Piaget employs the usual WESTERN CULTURE PRACTICE of “DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (the spontaneous) and employing only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE (the scientific), but as Vygotsky points out, Piaget makes a serious mistake and NOT ONLY DOES PIAGET NOT RECOGNIZE THE CONJUGATE WAVE-FIELD NATURE OF OUR CHILDREN’S EARLY, NATURALLY DEVELOPING LINGUISTIC CAPABILITY, HE ENCOURAGES US, THROUGH OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM, TO ‘DUMB DOWN’ OUR CHILDREN’S “THOUGHT AND LANGUAGE” (the title of Vygotsky’s major work) by TOSSING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and using only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE.

“Our disagreement with Piaget centers on one point only, but an important point. He assumes that development and instruction are entirely separate, incommensurate processes, that the function of instruction is merely to introduce adult ways of thinking, which conflict with the child’s own and eventually supplant them. Such a supposition stems from the old psychological tradition of separating the structural from the functional aspects of development.” –Vygotsky

Today, February 2025), as we continue to write about and discuss WHAT IS WRONG WITH OUR WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC (it’s FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM as Bohm and Nietzsche have pointed out), we are still NOT OWNING UP TO OUR LIFE AS INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM because we are CONTINUING TO DROP OUT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, hence the term “DEA ABSCONDITA (Goddess in hiding) which refers to our DROPPING OUT OF OUR LANGUAGE, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate by our giving a foundational role to BINARY LOGIC (which is too simple and can only handle the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate together within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE; i.e. we are DROPPING OUT OF OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE AND ‘SLIPPING IN’ ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE IN ITS PLACE.

* * * * * *

“TO EVERYTHING THERE IS A SEASON AND A TIME TO EVERY PURPOSE” is saying that the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT is in a NATURAL PRECEDENCE OVER THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT.  Here we get the sense that the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT is the ORGANIZING INFLUENCE in TRANSFORMATION while the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is the PRODUCT as in the case of ants clustering that is induced by honey dripping form an over-head bees nest   By FOCUSING ON JUST THE ANTS AND THEIR ACTIONS (without considering the overall TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM), we attempt to explain things in terms of such terms as ‘the ants are gathering and scattering’ which implies LOCAL, EXPLICIT actions and developments on the part of the ants, when the reality is that it is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT influences that are INDUCTIVELY SHAPING THEIR ACTION PATTERNS.  As in the example of launching the Hobie-Cat from a surf-pounded beach, the launching actions are, in reality (never mind the dumbed-down WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing), carefully orchestrated to ‘accomplish the launching in the quiet interval between two pounding wave-crests’, which puts this action IN HARMONY WITH NATURE’S DYNAMIC although WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING typically reports ONLY on the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate; i.e. “I LAUNCHED THE HOBIE-CAT”, as if the action could be captured FULLY and SOLELY IN MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING TERMS, when the REALITY is that the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is being INDUCTIVELY SHAPED AND ORCHESTRATED by FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING influence.

It would be a MISTAKE in this case to understand what is going on by way of the TOO SIMPLE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is based on ‘THE ANTS and WHAT THEY ARE DOING’; i.e. THEIR LOCAL, EXPLICIT MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMICS OF GATHERING and SCATTERING (seeming directed by their calculating ant minds).  This would have us think in terms on the ANTS having BRAINS that are capable of REASONING in which case their ACTIONS are DRIVEN by THEIR INTELLIGENT REASONING which is how we LIKE TO THINK OF OUR OWN MOVEMENTS; i.e. as if they are BORN FROM INTELLIGENT REASONING and are thus INSIDE-OUTWARDLY DRIVEN BY THE CEREBRAL REASONING FUNCITON.  But the reality is that the whole LANDSCAPE is undergoing TRANSFORMING in a manner wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) so why do we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS choose to FALL BACK ON the DOUBLE ERROR ABSTRACTION that supports the notional LOCAL AUTHORING ABSTRACTION?

PHILOSOPHICALLY, WHAT’S AT STAKE HERE IS WHETHER CHANGE IS A THINGLESS DYNAMIC AS WITH “TRANSFORMATION” where we ‘let go’ of the dependency on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT that we have put into our linguistic conceptualizing, and OPEN UP TO UNDERSTANDING IN TERMS OF THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in A FLOWING CONTINUUM or ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS in which case the relationship with the all-including energy-charged PLENUM is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.

The “INTELLIGENCE” IN THE WORLD UNDERSTOOD AS A NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM IS IN THE CONTINUUM WHILE the “INTELLIGENCE” IN THE WORLD UNDERSTOOD AS A COLLECTION OF LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL OBJECTS IS UNDERSTOOD AS BEING RESIDENT WITHIN THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT OBJECT.  This is a WESTERN CULTURE CONCEPTUALIZATION which has led to the CLASSIFICATION into CATEGORIES of purportedly INDEPENDENT MATERIAL FORMS; e.g. “The Great Chain of Being is a hierarchical model of the universe that ranks all matter and life from the most basic to the most perfect.  It is a concept that has been central to Western thought for centuries”.  NOTE THE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM based ASSUMPTION OF FRAGMENTATION INTO BEING based THINGS, as contrasts with the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM based understanding of the CONDENSATIONS included within the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (Mitakuye Oyasin).  

While the EAST and indigenous aboriginal cultures as well as Modern physics have opted for understanding of the world wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED, and subject to CONTINUOUS TRANSFORMATION, A DYNAMIC THAT IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT, …. AS CONTRASTS WITH the WESTERN CULTURE TRADITIONAL”FRAGMENTED” worldview which BREAKS THINGS DOWN into LOCAL, EXPLICIT PARTS USING the “DOUBLE ERROR” of NAMING and GRAMMAR.

Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” –NietzSche, ‘Will to POWER’, 531

BUT THE ALTERNATIVE IS TO COMPREHEND THAT ‘EVERYTHING IS IN TRANSFORMATIVE FLUX’ in which case WE DO NOT HAVE TO COME UP WITH AN EXPLANATION OF LOCAL, EXPLICIT DYNAMICS as describe WHAT THE ANTS ARE DOING because the REAL INFLUENCE may be at a higher level; i.e. the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, wherein the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is only APPEARANCE aka Schaumkommen.

TRANSFORMATION THAT WE ARE INCLUDED IN IS INTRINSICALLY NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and thus BEYOND CAPTURE IN VOYEUR LANGUAGE WHERE WE CAN “POINT OUT” WHAT IS GOING ON “OUT THERE” IN LOCAL AND EXPLICIT TERMS.  EASTERN CULTURE is using the COMBINATION of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as CONTEXT for LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONTENT which is equivalent to using the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING (the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) as CONTEXT for MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONTENT ( the GROWING TOWN).   While the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of the EAST employs these in a BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM construction, the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZIG of the WEST ‘DROPS OUT’ the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (‘IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’), and GOES WITH ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJGUATE (‘the TOWN is GROWING’).  This EAST – WEST SPLIT in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING can be described as follows;

§§§________

‘EAST refers to LESS SIMPLE, NON-BINARY (BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM) approach to LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of “REALITY” which is ANDROGYNOUS and combines the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in “THE LANDSCAPE IS TRANSFORMING”, …together with the LOCAL and EXPLICIT “the TOWN is GROWING” so that the LOCAL and EXPLICIT “CONTENT” is GROUNDED in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “CONTEXT” (i.e. inclusion in the transforming landscape).

‘WEST’ refers to the SIMPLE BINARY (EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM) approach to LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of “REALITY” which is ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY based, as in ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’, which is NO LONGER REPRESENTED WITHIN A TANGIBLE, ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka LANDSCAPE, but is presented as PURE CONTENT WITHOUT CONTEXT, as if it were a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF, understandable in terms of ITS OWN LOCAL CONTENT (as if it were a self-contained INDEPENDENT BEING in an EMPTY SPACE, rather than a FLUID FEATURE WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE).

¥¥¥__________

BUT THERE IS ONLY ONE SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, IN SPITE OF OUR HAVING A MULTIPLICITY OF INTELLECTUAL-LINGUISTIC SCHEMES WITH WHICH WE CAN CONSTRUCT LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS which MAY or MAY NOT BRING FORTH A GOOD ‘MATCH-UP’ WITH OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE; e.g. the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of our sense experience reality of inclusion in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE may be better supported by BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM than by EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM  (e.g. THERE IS TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) where EVERYTHING IS IN NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FLUX and there is NO “HOKEY” ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE CONTAINER, … rather than by (e.g. The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods) where there is only the LOCAL and EXPLICIT and there “IS” the “HOKEY” ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE CONTAINER.

IN WESTERN CULTURE, WHAT DO WE SEE?  WE SEE POLITICIANS ENCOURAGING THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE TO BE IN DENIAL OF

 “Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.” —Chief Seattle

AND, INSTEAD, TO BELIEVE IN OUR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT (THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GARMMAR).

The WESTERN CULTURE NOTION of OURSELVES as things with power constructing the world we want presumes INDIVIDUAL AUTHORING POWER rather than INCLUSION IN TRANSFORMATION.   Just because WE ARE INCLUDED IN TRANSFORMATION does not stop us from IMAGINING SITUATIONS in which we LINGUISTICALLY portray ourselves as the LOCAL AUTHORS OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS (i.e. by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR).  Can we claim to have built the sports arena?  Yes, we can, BUT THAT DOESN’T SPEAK TO HOW THE LANDSCAPE AND ITS CONTENTS INCLUDING OURSELVES IS BEING TRANSFORMED BY SUCH ACTION, OR RATHER, HOW SUCH ACTION MUST BE UNDERSTOOD IN THE LARGER CONTEXT OF TRANSFORMATION WHICH IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT, and LESS SIMPLE than LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘CONSTRUCTION’ and which INCLUDES the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONSTRUCTION.

“CONSTRUCTION” belongs to a SIMPLER INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION BASED PSEUDO-REALITY THAT IS ‘OUT THERE IN FRONT OF OUR VOYEUR GAZE’,  while “TRANSFORMATION” is what our SENSE-EXPERIENCE IS INFORMING US THAT WE ARE INCLUDED IN.

IN WESTERN CULTURE, we have SUCKED OURSELVES IN TO GIVING A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO “CONSTRUCTIONS” such as the INDEPENDENT, IMAGINARY LINE BOUNDARY DEFINED NATIONS.   IF WE AGREE TO PUT SUCH INTELLECTUAL BULLSHIT INTO FIRST PRIORITY FOR ‘REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION’, THEN OUR INCLUSION IN TRANSFORMATION, WHICH WILL ALWAYS BE WITH US BY WAY OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE, WILL HAVE TO PUSHED INTO THE BACKGROUND JUST LIKE WE PUSHED THE SHRINKING WILDERNESS INTO THE BACKGROUND AND PROMOTED THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN TO PRIMARY (PSEUDO-) REALITY, which has been the WESTERN CULTURE BRAIN-DRAW that came to WESTERN CULTURE WITH;

  ––– BINARY (EITHER/OR) LOGIC SPLIT OF MAN AND EARTH (“MATERIAL BEING” IN EMPTY SPACE): 

Genesis 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

THINGS ARE DIFFERENT where we are in a state of AWARENESS of our INCLUSION in SOMETHING GREATER THAN OURSELVES (TRANSFORMATION)

–––  QUANTUM (BOTH/AND) LOGIC INCLUSION OF MAN-IN-EARTH (CONDENSATION OF WAVE-FIELD IN WAVE-FIELD): 

 This we know, the earth does not belong to man, man belongs to the earth. This we know. All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected. Whatever befalls the earth, befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”— “Chief Seattle”

* * * *

The BOTTOM LINE is that we are included in TRANSFORMATION in which case the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT is in a natural precedence over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM is in a natural precedence over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONDENSATION OF THE PLENUM)

* * * * * *

WHAT’S WRONG WITH TRUMP and WESTERN CULTURE POLITICS IN GENERAL?

“WHAT’S WRONG” with WESTERN CULTURE POLITICS IS INFUSED WITHIN WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING and it is the BUILT-IN LOCAL AUTHORING PREMISE which as Nietzsche pointed out, is a DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMAR, and what this does is it SETS UP the NOTION of LOCAL AUTHORING WHENEVER and WHEREVER WE USE IT; e.g. “the TOWN IS GROWING”, … or “I, DONALD TRUMP, HAVE AUTHORED SUCH and SUCH” OR ‘WILL AUTHOR SUCH AND SUCH”.

SUCH “LOCAL AUTHORING TALK” sets up a PSEUDO-REALITY that, by supporting GROUP DISCUSSION such as “How is the NEW ARENA you promised to build coming along?”, AND DISTRACTS US FROM OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE INFORMED REALITY OF INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

THERE IS AN INVITATION HERE, TO shift our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING into LOCAL AUTHORING MODE using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR and saying; “It’s going very well, we have done the excavating and poured concrete for the foundation, and the materials for construction have been received and are stacked on the property, ready to go”.

WHAT’S MISSING?  WHAT’S MISSING IS THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, the HOLES IN THE WILDERNESS where TREES HAVE been taken for lumber and where excavations show where aggregate has been removed for making concrete, leaving holes in the terrain and iron ore has similarly been removed for smelting and making metal rods for reinforcing the ARENA. WHAT WE CAN PLAINLY ‘SEE’ and PHYSICALLY EXPLORE, in addition to the RISING STRUCTURE OF THE ARENA are the HOLES from which material have been extracted as well as offsite piles of WASTE MATERIAL associated with the refinement of those materials, SO THERE IS MORE TO SEE AND TO DESCRIBE than the GROWTH OF THE ARENA and we would have to say that IT IS MORE CORRECT TO SPEAK OF the OVERALL TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE rather than the CONSTRUCTION of the ARENA.  And MIXED IN with this TRANSFORMATION is the TRANSFORMING coming from RAIN STORMS and other WEATHER EVENTS which have spread loose materials around and carried them into the rivers and out into the ocean where they come to rest on the ocean bottom.  The ONGOING  NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATION IS A REALITY GREATER THAN THE PSEUDO-REALITY OF THE INTELLECTUALLY CARVED OUT LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONSTRUCTION.

So, WHAT IS ACTUALLY GOING ON is NOT CONSTRUCTION which is just a LOGICAL PROPOSITION and, as Goedel’s Theorem says, ALL FINITE PROPOSITIONS OF LOGIC ARE INCOMPLETE., … WHAT IS ACTUALLY GOING ON IS TRANSFORMATION which is UNBOUNDED in SPACE and TIME.

SO, ‘REALITY IS TRANSFORMATION’, the all-including TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

EVERYONE, and DONALD TRUMP, IS INCLUDED IN THIS ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and which is the PREDOMINATING REALITY AFFIRMED BY OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION THEREIN.   It is obvious that CONSTRUCTION is SOMETHING LESSER.  “CONSTRUCTION” is the APPEARANCE of just the MALE ASSERTING PROSITIVE PART OF our REARRANGING of things in the LANDSCAPE, and as talk of the DEA ABSCONDITA (Goddess in hiding) REMINDS US, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE DEVISED A LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME wherein WE DO NOT MENTION the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate developments which occur together with every MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING development.  If we pile up a TALL MOUNTAIN of soil ‘over here’ there will be a DEEP EXCAVATION in the soil ‘over there’, reminding us that the REAL DYNAMIC is TRANSFORMATION and NOT “CONSTRUCTION”.

“CONSTRUCTION” is only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate which always comes together with a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENBLING conjugate yet we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have the habit of NOT MENTIONING the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate in which case we hear talk of the DEA ABSCONDITA (Goddess in hiding) since it is certainly REAL in a SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED CONTEXT, but just something WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS DO NOT SPEAK OF.

THE REASON WHY WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS DO NOT MENTION THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE IS BECAUSE BINARY LOGIC IS TOO SIMPLE TO CONVEY IT, AND WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “LOVE” BINARY “EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM”  BECAUSE “IT IS SO SIMPLE” AND CONCISE AND IT MAKES NO MISTAKES (WELL, ONLY ONE MISTAKE) WHEN WE USE IT “FOR CONVEYING LOCAL AND EXPLICIT ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS”; E.G. “The TOWN is GROWING”.  The ONE MISTAKE that BINARY LOGIC SPEECH MAKES is that ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS are INCOMPLETE.  So, while the LOCAL and EXPLICIT PROPOSITION ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ is CORRECT, it is INCOMPLETE as is the case for ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS.

WE ARE AWARE OF THE CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS that occurs together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWTH OF THE TOWN, BUT WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE DOES NOT MENTION THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE AND THE REASON IS BECAUSE WESTERN CULTURE, AND IN PARTICULAR WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE, HAS BECOME OBSESSED WITH IMPOSING SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC ANALYSIS AND JUDGEMENT ON EVERYTHING. 

BUT INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL JUSTICE is “BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM based which is NOT AS LIMITING as BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC.  For example, SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM (where the medium is empty and uninvolved) FORCES US TO ASSUME THAT PHYSICAL DYNAMICS INVOLVE MATTER in EMPTY SPACE while BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM (where the medium is FULL OF ENERGY and INVOLVED) ENABLES US TO ASSUME THAT PHYSICAL DYNAMICS INVOLVE CONDENSATIONS IN AN ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM where the CONDENSATION is “BOTH ITSELF AND THE PLENUM IT IS A CONDENSATION IN”.  The BOTH/AND LOGIC that applies where, where the material form is a CONDENSATION of the energy-charged PLENUM it is included in, IS NOT A SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC RELATION, IT IS A LESS SIMPLE BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM RELATION and this LESS SIMPLE PHYSICAL RELATION is the actual PHYSICAL REALITY AND IT IS BEYOND THE DISCURSIVE REACH OF BINARY LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE.

Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm

(and as condensations in the wave-field, WE ARE ALL RELATED , as is the message of ‘mitakuye oyasin’)  

* * * * * * * * *

Now, we can sum up what’s going on with TRUMP and WESTERN CULTURE.

-1- TRANSFORMATION IS THE ONGOING REALITY.  This is what we would like our language to be able to articulate, but TRANSFORMATION is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and WE AND EVERYTHING ARE INCLUDED IN IT, as Bohm states in the above quote.

-2- Indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta employ FLOW-based languages (VERB-grounded languages) which are capable of BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM relational constructions which means, that they are capable of the ANDROGYNOUS structure as can be seen in “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” where ‘the TOWNING’ is the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate while ‘in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate.  This language, as shown in this example, is capable of GOING BEYOND BINARY LOGIC constructions to BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM constructions as in  “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” … or “THERE IS HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”

-3- The WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing is commonly simple BINARY LOGIC based construction, our LANGUAGE uses NAMES to imply the existence of LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING-based MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES which EITHER exist OR do not exist, and here we say things like ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ which is ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING which in order to be LOGICALLY TRUE, requires INCLUSION IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, otherwise ‘the TOWN’ could not be ‘ACTING ON ITS OWN’ as if with POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development.  HEREWITH COMES THE WESTERN CULTURE INFLATED EGO from the LINGUISTIC INFERENCE of LOCAL AUTHORING and the WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE of LOCALLY AUTHORED ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS which can be judged with BINARY LOGIC to be EITHER GOOD OR BAD .

-4- In the ANDROGYNOUS structure as can be seen in “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, in which case there is NO BINARY LOGIC based LOCAL AUTHORING.  In other words, the less simple BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the CONDENSATION is both ITSELF and at the same time, the INCLUDING MEDIUM (as also with WHORLING in the FLOWING) is LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC and does not DESCEND to the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based level.  It is SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC that OPENS THE WAY TO HUMONGOUS ERRONEOUS LOCAL AUTHORING PROPOSITIONS WHERE THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING, there is only TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT

* * * *

WE ALL SHARE INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM wherein everything is related as with CONDENSATION of the all-including energy-charged PLENUM wherein everything is interconnected and interdependent.  As with STRANDS IN A WEB, THERE IS NO SUCH THING as LOCAL AUTHORING and in indigenous aboriginal culture, because of the interconnectedness and interdependence, where there is an outburst of violence, the natural response is the HEALING CIRCLE and RESTORATIVE JUSTICE where everyone co-cultivates the restoring of relational balance and harmony. 

BUT IN WESTERN CULTURE, we are stuck with the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based MISCONCEPTION of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development wherein society is seen as a collective of INDEPENDENT BEINGS notionally with their own powers of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments which supports the imputing of AMAZINGLY GOOD DEVELOPMENTS and AMAZINGLY BAD DEVELOPMENTS to notional INDEPENDENT BEINGS, as if actions were LOCAL and EXPLICIT (BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM BASED) rather than NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM BASED).   The INCLUDING MEDIUM is the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which supports an overall INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE as in the STRAND-IN-THE-WEB relation.

* * ** *