A SIMPLE STORY THAT IS SPAWNING MUCH CONFUSION
We have BINARY LOGIC and we have QUANTUM LOGIC and we can capture our impressions of REALITY using EITHER.
BINARY LOGIC is inherently ambiguous with respect to its deploying in representing natural phenomena; e.g. if we use MALE ASSERTING to say the HURRICANE is STIRRING up the ATMOSPHERE, we IMPLY, as a kind of GHOST possibility, the FEMALE INDUCTIVE conjugate, that the ATMOSPHERE is stirring up the HURRICANE.
This conjugate splitting of reality into Male and Female ambiguity arises from the incapacity of NAMING and GRAMMAR based language architecture to capture SPHERICAL SPACE reality, our sense-experience reality of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD, the transforming relational continuum, reality as understood in Modern physics.
Our visual sensing is easily and quickly given representation in terms of LOCAL, EXPLICIT FORMS (its not the forms which are LOCAL and EXPLICIT but our REPRESENTATIONS of them) which can either be CLOSED as in MALE-ASSERTING (e.g. the TOWN is GROWING, .. or FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING (e.g. the WILDERNESS is SHRINKING). The OPTION to split our REPRESENTATION OF REALITY into TWO CONJUGAL POLAR OPPOSITES opens up AMBIGUITY in the language we use to share our experiences of reality and thus complicates the challenge of coming to some common understanding of the reality we share inclusion in. While the WESTERN CULTURE unwritten rule is to employ the MALE-ASSERTIVE branch of the BIPOLAR optional representation of reality, the polar opposite option of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING reality representing option is also an option and has a presence like a loose cannon on a ship’s deck, making unexpected interventions in the language based representation process.
This ambiguity arises only in our WESTERN CULTURE because we employ language architecture that reduces our experience of inclusion in TRANSFORMATION to the DOUBLE ERROR terms of NAMING and GRAMMAR wherein we experience reality (or try to) in terms of NAMING-given LOCAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES with GRAMMAR-given powers of AUTHORING actions and development. This scheme SPLITS “our language based representation of reality (the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the TAO, into TWO BINARY LOGIC based CONJUGATES we call MATTER and SPACE and in expressing them with BINARY LOGIC, we define them as MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE of one another, whereupon the AMBIGUITY arises as to which one is in the ‘DRIVER’S SEAT’? We are left with an open choice of “EITHER” the HURRICANE stir up the ATMOSPHERE? ….”OR” the ATMOSPHERE stirs up the HURRICANE. This “BINARY LOGIC AMBIGUITY” is inescapable WHEN we INSIST upon a language architecture that REDUCES our REPRESENTATION of reality to terms that are LOCAL and EXPLICIT (MECHANISTIC) instead of following the practice of the EAST and Modern physics where language architecture must be able to deal with the FLUID and thus NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT nature of the transforming relational continuum as being a basic feature of reality.
So, it is WORTH KEEPING MIND that the AMBIGUOUS OPTION of MALE-ASSERTIVE and FEMALE-ACCOMMODATIVE “REPRESENTATION APPROACHES” for language based expression of “REALITY” ONLY EMERGE when we insist on a language design architecture that embodies a reduction to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT. In those language architectures that preserve the fluid nature of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, the TROUBLESOME AMBIGUITY DOES NOT ARISE. And I say ‘TROUBLESOME AMBIGUITY’ because this undeclared CHOICE of reality representations really does throw a wrench into the pursuit of coming to an common understanding of the transforming relational continuum we share inclusion in. While some of us are, for example, assuming that the HURRICANE is stirring up the ATMOSPHERE (the Male-Assertive reality option), some (others) of us are assuming that the ATMOSPHERE is stirring up the HURRICANE (the Female-Inductive reality option.
This split manifests in the polarized division between CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL since the former believe that the INDIVIDUAL is the ASSERTIVE AUTHOR of organized actions and developments while the latter believe that the SOCIAL COLLECTIVE is the INDUCTIVE AUTHOR of organized actions and developments.
There is a SPLITTING and POLARIZING that derives from BELIEF IN LOCAL AUTHORING that is unique to WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS since neither EASTERN (including indigenous aboriginal) cultures nor Modern physics BUYS INTO THE ABSTRACTION OF “LOCAL AUTHORING” of actions and developments, an ABSTRACTION OF SIMPLIFYING CONVENIENCE which allows language to CUT INTO THE TRANSFORMATION RELATIONAL CONTINUUM and BREAK IT DOWN INTO LOCAL, EXPLICIT PIECES which which can be ANIMATED WITH GRAMMAR on their own SEPARATE (FRAGMENTED) BASIS so as to develop a SUBSTITUTE REALITY that is no longer IMPOSSIBLE TO CAPTURE to capture in a PIECE-WISE manner, an impossibility that characterizes the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the TAO. Thus the SUBSTITUTE REALITY succeeds in serving up a reality that can be FRAGMENTED into LOCAL PIECES at will and doing an ‘end run’ around the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT character of our sense-experience reality of inclusion in TRANSFORMATION. The LOCAL FRAGMENTS that we can reduce fluid reality to are packaged into a WORD and PICTURE combination wherein the EXPLICITNESS of the WORD (the NAME FLOW-FORM) ECLIPSES the innate NONLOCALITY and IMPLICITNESS of the flow-form; e.g. the word HURRICANE paired with a PICTURE of HURRICANING IN THE ATMOSPHERING overcomes the NONLOCALITY of HURRICANING in the TRANSFORMING relational continuum reduces the observer’s cognitive impression to an association between the NAME-LABELLED PICTURE of a LOCAL and EXPLICIT FORM which WE HAVE IMPOSED on the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT flow feature. In this case, instead of THE DYNAMIC persisting as naturally IMMANENT in the transforming relational continuum, the DYNAMIC is TRANSFERRED to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT NAMING-instantiated THING-IN-ITSELF anchored in our perception by NOW-LABELLED relational flow-form.
The HURRICANE is thus, thanks to NAMING AND GRAMMAR, COGNITIVELY LIBERATED from the transforming relational continuum and its MALE ASSERTING FREEDOM is supported by its NEW HOME OF ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, the abstract language-and-grammar SUBSTITUTE for what could described as its CONJUGATE RELATION within a QUANTUM LOGIC SPACE wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE as in the relation between MATTER and FIELD wherein MATTER is a CONDENSATION of the ELECTIROMAGNIETIC FIELD.
WE ARE DISTRACTED, in our language architecting game play, by this AMBIGUITY between the MALE ASSERTIVE and the FEMALE INDUCTIVE options for understanding our SPLITTING APART of FIGURE and GROUND that GETS US OUT OF THE LANGUAGE-CAPTURE-INHIBITING reality of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT properties of the transforming relational coninuum; i.e. DOES THE HURRICANE STIR UP THE ATMOSPHERE OR DOES THE ATMOSPHERE STIR UP THE HURRICANE?
HEY! The indigenous aboriginal culture (along with Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents NEVER HAD THIS AMBIGUITY problem beasue QUANTUM LOGIC accepts the FIGURE and GROUND as ONE reality wherein there is HURRICANING IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, so that the reduction to BINARY LOGIC and the splitting apart of FIGURE and GROUND never happened and there was no AMBIGUITY source dispute over whether the AUTHORING source of action derives from the MALE-ASSERTIVE or FEMALE inductive because LOCAL AUTHORING is ABSTRACTION that SPLITS THE AUTHOR out of the transforming relational continuum so that HE CAN BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR BEING THE LOCAL SOURCE OF HIS OWN DYNAMICS.
The point is that the AMBIGUITY that haunts the minds of WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS derives from the imputing of BINARY LOGIC based structure in language-based reality representation so as to engender the abstraction of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT INHABITANT, this LOCAL and EXPLICIT EXISTENCE status setting up the abstraction of the LOCAL AUTHOR. The abstraction of the LOCAL AUTHOR makes possible representation that is no longer NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (as in relational and fluid), but which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT. EVERYTHING IS LOOKING GOOD FOR LIBERATING LANGUAGE FROM HAVING TO DEAL WITH THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT character of the transforming relational continuum, … BUT WITH ONE GLITCH, … In SPLITTING OUT FIGURES from GROUND, we generate an AMBIGUITY as to the nature of dynamics; i.e. as to whether the FIGURE is stirring up the GROUND (the MALE ASSERTIVE CONJUGATE OPTION) or whether the GROUND is stirring up the FIGURE (the FEMALE-INDUCTIVE CONJUGATE OPTION).
In what Mircea Eliade refers to a kind of deal with the devil (in order to reduce the ineffable to the effable) in his work ‘Mehistopheles et l’Andgyne’ (a title translated into English in the rather bland terms of ‘the Two and the One’, the point is made that we pay a price for coming up with an EFFABLE version of the INEFFABLE. The EFFABLE SUBSTITUTE REALITY splits sense-experience reality of inclusion in transformation, into TWO conjugate parts. For example in reducing HURRICANING IN THE TRANSFORMING ATMOSPHERE where the HURRICANING IS ONE WITH THE ATMOSPHERING as in QUANTUM LOGIC, to ‘the HURRICANE’ which is NOTIONALLY SEPARATE FROM and MOVING THROUGH the ATMOSPHERE (as in BINARY LOGIC), … i.e. we have created a BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY making it possible to PORTRAY the FIGURE, not only as an ONTOLOGY that EXISTS SEPARATELY from the GROUND, but which, THANKS TO GRAMMAR, is equipped with “ITS” own powers of AUTHORING actions and developments.
Thanks to this DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based construction of a SUBSTITUTE REALITY, we are no longer encumbered with a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT flow-based representation of reality, but we are able to think and speak in terms of a SUBSTITUTE REALITY with LOCAL and EXPLICIT features, and this ‘deal with the devil’ capability only has one drawback which is its CONJUGATE nature which presents the ambiguity as to whether action (TRANSFORMATION (which we no longer talk about in this LOCAL and EXPLICIT SUBSTITUTE REALITY) is constituted by the MALE-ASSERTIVE CONJUGATE or the FEMALE-INDUCTIVE CONJUGATE. The popular habit is to employ the MALE ASSERTIVE CONJUGATE in which case, the FEMALE INDUCTIVE CONJUGATE is left lurking about in the unmentioned shadowland and employed without fanfare, slipped into WESTERN rhetoric without warning and confusing understanding within the social collective. While some people are left believing that that the individual stirs up the social collective, others are left believing that the social collective stirs up the individual. This is a CONJUGATE SPLITTING that FRAGMENTS our understanding and thus also our FRAGMENTS our social collective AND IT HAS NO ANSWER since this split only COMES INTO BEING in the wake of the COMING INTO BEING of DOUBLE ERROR based notion of LOCAL AUTHORING. Is the LOCAL AUTHORING MALE-ASSERTIVE or FEMALE-INDUCTIVE?
For indigenous aboriginals and Modern physics, THIS AMBIGUITY DOES NOT EVEN MATERIALIZE BECAUSE THERE IT COMES INTO BEING WITH WITH ASSUMPTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING AND THERE IS NO LOCAL AUTHORING IN A TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, NOR IN LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS WHERE THE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS FLOW-BASED.
* * * The language we are using in this narrative (ENGLISH) comes with an innate exposure to ambiguous interpretation imposed by either writer or reader * * *
But our WESTERN CULTURE standard thinking is in terms of FLAT SPACE (a mathematical abstract concept of space as an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE CONTAINER, consistent with Newtonian physics) Benjamin Whorf has shown that the Euclidian space assumed by Newton is just the formalization of early WESTERN LANGUAGE and GRAMMAR, the cornerstone abstract of which is LOCAL AUTHORING.
Nietzsche has pointed out that CREATE THE NOTION of LOCAL AUTHORING with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as exemplified by ‘the EARTH TURNS ROUND’. As Poincaré has also shown, DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING to establish LOCAL BEING and GRAMMAR to conflate the first error with a SECOND ERROR imputes to the NAMING-instantiated LOCAL THING we just created the GRAMMAR-given powers of AUTHORING actions and developments such as GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION.
The language-based inferring of LOCAL AUTHORING equips language with the capability of fabricating conceptualizations in a piece-meal LOCAL FRAGMENT based approach; e.g. we speak of “THE TOWN” and how it GROWS, DEVELOPS and PRODUCES things”… implying LOCAL AUTHORING. Meanwhile our sense-experience reality of inclusion in a transforming relational continuum would NOT have us understand that WE ARE AUTHORS of LOCAL actions and developments, but are instead INCLUDED IN NONLOCAL ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS; i.e. TRANSFORMATION.
So, our use of language that employs the abstraction of LOCAL AUTHORING of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, which gives us language that supports INTELLECTUAL constructions of reality based on FRAGMENTS with LOCAL STARTING POINTS; i.e. FRAGMENTS that can GROW and DEVELOP and PRODUCE, all of which is flowing forth from an EXPLICIT local AUTHORING BASE. This gives us a means of CONSTRUCTING LANGUAGE-BASED “REPRESENTATIONS” of a “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” which is unlike the all-pervading, transforming relational continuum we share inclusion in, which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT because EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.
We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have, one might say, “made a deal with the devil” to overcome the INEFFABLE nature of our sense experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum, by introducing this capability of FRAGMENTATION of reality using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.
Without this DOUBLE ERROR contrivance in our LANGUAGE which generates IMPRESSIONS that are LOCAL and EXPLICIT, we would be stymied by the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational, fluid) nature of reality, since such cannot be captured in a finite number of words.
That is, we are faced with the fact that reality is an endless continuum (the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao) which eludes capture in finite language constructs which is a basic restriction in language based communications.
THE TRICK, then, in how to use language with its finite phrasing limitations to capture the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT dynamics of sense-experience reality, … is to construct a LOCAL, EXPLICIT SUBSTITUTE REALITY by FRAGMENTING the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT (relational) sense-experience
This LOCAL and EXPLICIT SUBSTITUTE REALITY offers us a LOCAL and ExPLICIT (FRAGMENTED) RE-PRESENTATION of our sense-experience reality. This NAMING and GRAMMAR reduction is how we construct representations in terms of notional LOCAL AUTHORS of actions and developments.
These LOCAL AUTHORS are NOT REAL, they are the mental concepts SUGGESTED by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR where we construct a SUBSTITUTE REALITY featuring a notional LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF (thanks to NAMING), notionally with its own powers of AUTHORING actions and developments such as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION (thanks to GRAMMAR).
The effective result of this use of DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based language is the generating of an abstract SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT which we can SUBSTITUTE for our sense-experience reality, a reality that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, as is the nature of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum.
This DOUBLE-ERROR based LANGUAGE TOOL that constructs EFFABLE SUBSTITUTE REALITIES that INFER the INEFFABLE SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, in the case of us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, is a TOOL that has RUN AWAY WITH THE WORKMAN, the HUMAN with the DIVINE (Emerson) because we are using this SUBSTITUTE REALITY to REPRESENT OURSELVES in a synthetic manner, so that as EGO seeps in, we no longer see ourselves as belonging to the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT but instead see ourselves as LOCAL BEINGS with EXPLICIT LOCAL BODIES and, notionally, WITH OUR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments. This is SUBSTITUTE REALITY REPRESENTATION, a ‘TOOL’ that has RUN AWAY WITH US, WE WHO SHARE INCLUSION IN THE INEFFABLE-BECAUSE-NONLOCAL-and-IMPLICIT transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao.
While, as Lao Tzu says; ‘the Tao that can be told IS NOT THE TRUE TAO’, the fact that this SUBSTITUTE REALITY is ‘tellable’ (shareable) thanks to language, is very helpful, … although it comes with the drawback that when it is confused for REALITY; i.e. when we put it into an unnatural precedence over our INEFFABLE sense-experience reality of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the TAO, our minds can get very confusing and FRAGMENTED,
This FRAGMENTING is part of the deal with the devil, so to speak, the price we have to pay for being given a scheme for REDUCING the INEFFABLE to something (i.e. a “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”) that is “EFFABLE”.
The REDUCTION is from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT of WAVE-FIELD reality to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT MECHANICAL REALITY (which is unreal abstraction).
Understanding the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT requires QUANTUM LOGIC since FIGURE-and-GROUND-are-ONE as in the understanding of MATTER being a condensation of the electromagnetic field.
Understanding the LOCAL and EXPLICIT requires BINARY LOGIC since FIGURE and GROUND are TWO, MATTER and SPACE being understood as TWO MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE ONTOLOGIES (Note that QUANTUM LOGIC has no ONTOLOGICAL dependence as BINARY LOGIC with its FIGURE and GROUND as TWO EXPLICIT AND DIFFERENT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES DOES.
THESE TWO TYPES OF LOGIC AND HOW THEY CONDITION OUR UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY GIVE ESSENTIAL INSIGHTS INTO OUR EASTERN AND WESTERN CULTURE CONCEPTIONS OF REALITY AND HOW THEY DIFFER..
BINARY LOGIC wherein FIGURE and GROUND are TWO so that the HURRICANE is seen as MOVING THROUGH the ATMOSPHERE rather than as in QUANTUM LOGIC wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE so that “THERE IS HURRICANING IN THE ATMOSPHERING” wherein everything is in flux as in the WAVE-FIELD dynamic aka the Tao.
Modern physics CONFIRMS the sense-experience accord with the QUANTUM LOGIC reality, however the ABSTRACT REALITY of BINARY LOGIC has, in WESTERN CULTURE, been given “THE” FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in the INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUALIZING of reality, … NOT BECAUSE IT IS MORE TRUE BUT BECAUSE IT IS MORE SIMPLE in that it makes language SIMPLE by way of the abstractions of LOCAL and EXPLICIT whereby we FRAGMENT reality and put together conceptual representations BIT BY BIT in a kind of custom engineered fashion.
This FRAGMENTATION approach has the problem of INCOMLETENESS of the FRAGMENTS which is captured in Goedel’s Theorem of INCOMPLETENESS of all finite systems of LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS, because these LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS “REDUCE” NATURE’S DYNAMIC of the transforming relational continuum which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT to a SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.
This WESTERN CULTURE language based construction of SUBSTITUTE REALITY is confusing because it FRAGMENTS reality, or rather, it constructs a SUBSTITUTE REALITY built with FRAGMENTATION where we say, for example; this is a TOWN and it includes a CITY HALL and this and that and the other and all of this is LOCAL and EXPLICIT as if we were describing all of the rocks that had come down in an avalanche in great detail without bothering to mention the hole in the flank of the mountain and thus without bothering to consider BOTH the MALE ASSERTIVE and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugates which inform us of the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE.
Of course, these MALE ASSERTIVE and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE DYNAMICS are NOT the CAUSE of TRANSFFORMATION, the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC “IS” TRANSFORMATION
By the time we geat finished with our clumsy use of language to speak about avalanches taking holes out of the sides of mountains and filling in valleys, and consider that the mountain is no longer the same mountain and the valley is no longer the same valley, then our LOCAL and EXPLICIT REFERENCE ANCHORS drop out and only the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT remain, suggesting that those LOCAL and EXPLICIT entities were ABSTRACT ‘MAP FEATURES’ that were NOT THE REAL TRANSFORMING TERRITORY.
Once we bring to mind that, yes, the reality is the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, this lets us recall that this is an ongoing dynamic and it is all-including and includes ourselves as well.
One might say that the first step in ‘recovering our sanity’ (escaping from our SUBSTITUTE REALITY) is to acknowledge that we are using our DUMBED DOWN with language MALE-ASSERTIVE ONLY abstract representation of reality, as our OPERATIVE REALITY. This SUBSTITUTE REALITY does not ‘accord’ with our sense-experience reality. Our sense experience reality is informing us, for example, that avalanches are NOT simply MALE ASSERTIVE MOVEMENTS OF ROCKS DOWN THE MOUNTAINSIDE INTO THE VALLEY, … FOR IT IS NOT THE SAME MOUNTAIN without those rocks and it is not the same VALLEY WITH those rocks. In other words, what is going on is NOT MALE-ASSERTIVE “MOVEMENT OF ROCKS”, it is TRANSFORMATION, … which is a WARNING as to how language can CONFUSE our INTELLIGENCE.
This is part of the so-called ‘DEAL WITH THE DEVIL’ where language allows us to overcome the INEFFABLE nature our sense-experience reality but AT A PRICE, the price of SPLITTING and FRAGMENTING the articulated version of REALITY into MALE and FEMALE CONJUGATES and then lifting off the MALE CONJUGATE and employing it as OUR WESTERN CULTURE “OPERATIVE REALITY” wherein we have LOCAL AUTHORING of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION while TRANSFORMATION IS GONE FROM THE PICTURE.
So, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are NOT ONLY using the REDUCTION of TRANSFORMATION to the MALE-ASSERTIVE based SUBSTITUTE REALITY, we are simply IGNORING our casting out of the FEMALE INDUCTIVE CONJUGATE. ‘SHE’ become the ‘DEA INCOGNITA’ which comes back to HAUNT us because while we no longer include her in our language-based representations of reality, she continues to ‘play her part’.
What that omission translates into is that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are talking about and investing and profiting from what we claim is GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, … all MALE ASSERTIVE ABSTRACTIONS (since our sense-experience reality is of living in a transforming relational continuum).
This means that all the while we are priding ourselves in our achievements in terms of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, what has REALLY been going on is TRANSFORMATION, and TRANSFORMATION includes what we have excluded (the DEA ABSCONDITA), those HOLES that we are opening up in supporting GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION. Even as foundations crack and houses tilt from our extraction of oil from subsurface reservoirs, we continue to call it PRODUCTION. There is nothing in the term OIL PRODUCTION that suggests anything other than MALE ASSERTIVE action and development, the OPENING OF EVER LARGER HOLES from MINING extractions is NOT ONLY NOT IMPLIED by the word PRODUCTION, the conjugate opening of holes which are making the terrain look like aportrait of Dorian Gray, go without mention in our WESTERN CULTURE language-based reality representions.
If we can see ‘the AVALANCHE SPILLING DOWN THE MOUNTSIDE,’, … then we can’t at the same time see the HOLE IN THE MOUNTAIN and FILLING IN OF THE VALLEY, or in other words, we can’t see TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT if we can see the MALE ASSERTIVE which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT (the tumbling pile of rocks).
As far as the HOLE in the ‘mountainside’ that is OPENING CONJUGATE WITH THE PILING UP OF ROCKS down the slope which is a modification to the overall unbounded LANDSCAPE, this WHOLENESS that accommodates all of this LOCAL and EXPLICIT change is the DEA ABSCONDITA, the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT aspect of the TRANSFORMING LANDCAPE, the latter comprehending BOTH CONJUGATES, the MALE ASSERTING ROCKS POUNDING DOWN INTO AND FILLING IN THE VALLEY and the FEMALE OPENING OF AN ENLARGING HOLE IN THE MOUNTAIN FACE.
HEY! ITS NOT THE SAME MOUNTAIN WITH THE ROCKS REMOVED and ITS NOT THE SAME VALLEY WITH THE INFILLING BY ROCKS. Our language is playing tricks with our mind, and in particular, while our sense-experience is informing us of TRANSFORMATION which, being NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT is not directly EFFABLE, our reducing of sense-experience to language based conceptualizing, in our standard WESTERN CULTURE language architecture approach, first of all BREAKS DOWN TRANSFORMATION INTO MALE and FEMALE CONJUGATES and then presents only the MALE CONJUGATE as the basis for a NEW SUBSTITUTE REALITY.
This new SUBSTITUTE REALITY simply IGNORES the sense-experience affirmed reality of TRANSFORMATION and proceeds with language based intellectual conceptualizing that features only the MALE ASSERTIVE CONJUGATE as the OPERATIVE REALITY so that the one-sided male-assertive abstractions of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION are presented as REALITY; i.e. within this new one-sided male-assertive SUBSTITUTE REALITY.
THIS REDUCTION TO ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTIVE CONSTRUCTIONS OF SUBSTITUTE REALITY OPENS UP THE POSSIBILITY FOR USING “BINARY LOGIC” TO EXPLAIN DYNAMICS WITHIN THIS SUBSTITUTE REALITY. BINARY LOGIC SUPPORTS THE ONE-SIDED CONCEPT OF MALE-ASSERTIVE “LOCAL AUTHORING” OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS. WE MAY POSE THE QUESTION; IS IT TRUE OR FALSE THAT THE TOWN IS GROWING LARGER AND MORE PROSPEROUS AND PRODUCTIVE, … AND WHO IS GOING TO QUESTION OUR INCORPORATING of the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR in such phraseology THAT ESTABLISHES THE ONTOLOGIC EXISTENCE, BY WAY OF NAMING ‘THE TOWN’ (the FIRST ERROR) AND ITS POWER OF LOCAL AUTHORING, THE SECOND ERROR GIVEN BY GRAMMAR?
Almost NO-ONE in our WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENCY is questioning the OVERT DOUBLE ERROR (NAMING AND GRAMMAR) construction of LOCAL AUTHORING which is the origin of FRAGMENTATION.
THE PROPOSITIONS OF BINARY LOGIC ARE EMBODIMENTS OF THE “DOUBLE ERROR” OF “NAMING AND GRAMMAR”.
QUANTUM LOGIC, ON THE OTHER HAND, IS RELATIONAL AND ASSUMES THAT “THERE IS HURRICANING IN THE ATMOSPHERING” AS MAKES SENSE WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF THE OVERALL, ALL-INCLUDING, TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM. THERE IS NO EXPOSURE HERE TO THE AMBIGUITY AS IN THE CONJUGATES OF ‘THE HURRICANE IS STIRRING UP THE ATMOSPHERE’ AND ‘THE ATMOSPHERE IS STIRRING UP THE HURRICANE’, … MAKING IT UNCLEAR (AMBIGUOUS) AS TO WHETHER THE ACTION IS INTRINSICALLY MALE ASSERTIVE OR FEMALE INDUCTIVE, THE PROBLEM OF AMBIGUITY DERIVING FROM THE IMPLICIT ASSUMPTION OF A BINARY LOGIC RELATION BETWEEN THE HURRICANE AND THE ATMOSPHERE RATHER THAN A MODERN PHYSICS AFFIRMED QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION WHEREIN HURRICANE AND ATMOSPHERE ARE ONE; I.E. WHERE THERE IS HURRICANING IN THE ATMOSPHERING CONSISTENT WITH EVERYTHING BEING IN FLUX AS IS THE NATURE OF THE WAVE-FIELD.
The SIMPLE STORY that is SPAWNING much confusion is the STORY that MATTER and SPACE ARE TWO. This LIBERATES the MALE ASSERTIVE so that, at least in language-based representations, our CONSTRUCTIONS OF REALITY CAN BE BASED ON LOCAL FRAGMENTS WITH THEIR OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS. THIS FRAGMENTATION CANNOT BE VERIFIED IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, BUT IS ONLY AN ABSTRACTION EMPLOYED IN LANGUAGE BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS THAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE IN THE HABIT OF EMPLOYING AS OUR ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’ WHICH IS A MIND AND MATTER FRAGMENTING ABERRATION THAT HAS COME TO CHARACTERIZE WESTERN CULTURE..
BINARY LOGIC (its confusing use in modeling reality) HAS TO GO, AND SO DO PATHOGENS WHICH ARE BINARY LOGIC BASED CONSTRUCTIONS. BINARY LOGIC SETS UP DELUSIONAL “IDOLS” WHICH ARE NOT REAL; – THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM IS REAL, … SO WE NEED TO ‘SMASH THE IDOLS’ AS NIETZSCHE ARGUES IN ‘TWILIGHT OF THE IDOLS” SO AS TO GET BACK IN TOUCH WITH OUR INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.
COVID 19 AND PATHOGENS IN GENERAL ARE ‘IDOLS’ THAT WE IMPUTE TO HAVE LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, THUS FRAGMENTING REALITY (FRAGMENTING OUR MENTAL CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF REALITY).
IN SENSE EXPERIENCE REALITY EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX SO IT IS NATURAL TO ENCOURAGE/FEED RELATIONAL RESONANCE AND DISCOURAGE/STARVE RELATIONAL DISSONANCE. IT MAY BE LOGICAL, BUT IT IS NOT SANE TO RESPOND TO CONFLICT ARISING FROM, FOR EXAMPLE, A RICH AND POOR SPLIT, WITH AN ANTI-PATHOGEN APPROACH; WHAT IS NEEDED IS RELATIONAL REBALANCING RATHER THAN PURIFICATIONIST ELIMINATION OF PERCEIVED ‘PATHOGENS’.
What is not known is how deeply people may be impacted by a RICH and POOR split (e.g. as in the Irish Famine). Using BINARY LOGIC makes it SIMPLE to devise an administration scheme since it can be simply stated and expressed; i.e. no stealing. However, if this means for some, their young children are dying from starvation, the REBALANCING tensions may grow extremely high and eliminating REBALANCING AGENTS can induce a continual stream of REBALANCER VARIANTS.
Since WESTERN CULTURE (mis) labels REBALANCERS “PATHOGENS” and sets the wheels of PATHOGEN ELIMINATION in motion (as is common in medicine in the case of microbial assemblage imbalances), the ANTI-PATHOGEN programs, being BINARY LOGIC based, fail to see the more complex QUANTUM LOGIC reality wherein THERE ARE NO SUCH THINGS AS PATHOGENS, but there is instead, IMBALANCE and the remedy for IMBALANCE is REBALANCE.
We know from history that when the RICH and POOR split becomes large and the POOR are hit with serious deficiencies, there can be UPRISINGS by those desperate for some REBALANCING that get them out of the dangerously acute HAVE-NOT zone. At this point of IMBALANCE, there may be many committed BALANCE-RESTORERS out in the street. The same thing happens in the microbial assemblage; i.e. imbalance induces proliferation of RE-BALANCING AGENTS. To mistake these RE-BALANCING AGENTS for PATHOGENS and launch an ANTI-BIOTIC attack to ELIMINATE THEM is to SHOOT OURSELVES IN THE FOOT because this will not resolve the IMBALANCE and the new waves of NEW VARIANT REBALANCERS will keep coming.
The misguided ANTI-PATHOGEN programs may produce intervals of quiet as the population of REBALANCERS mistaken for PATHOGENS is reduced with ANTI-PATHOGEN technologies such as VACCINES, however, it is IMBALANCE which is the source of proliferation of REBALANCERS and ANTI-PATHOGEN technology is a PROTECTOR of IMBALANCE as POLICE the protectors of IMBALANCE in RICH and POOR situations. The logic of ENTITLEMENT of the RICH is basically a support for continuing IMBALANCE which means increased investment in anti-pathogen technologies such as police which will protect the imbalance and perpetuate the strife.
* * *