AUTHOR’S SUMMARY of; LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM in Western Culture Language Architecture

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have ‘engineered’ the Common Average European language architecture to BREAK DOWN and SIMPLIFY our language capture of WAVE-FIELD REALITY by BREAKING OUT the MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE ON ITS OWN, and at the same time simply DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE so as to construct a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on ONE-SIDED, BINARY LOGIC based MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, as for example ‘the TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’ which implies BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR SPLITTING of the TOWN out of the LANDSCAPE and implying only MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS without any FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.

While this one-sided MALE ASSERTING is all that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are putting into our language based representations, our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is of inclusion in the ANDROGYNOUS (FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE-ASSERTING) WAVE-FIELD, setting up a CONFLICT between our LANGUAGE-INFORMED INTELLECT and our SENSE-EXPERIENCE INFORMED AWARENESS, and this is the source of rising FRAGMENTATION within our psyche and in our actions as WESTERN CULTURE ADHERING individuals and social collectives.

This LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE is “NOT” SUFFERED by indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents. These groups have acknowledged the natural fit of QUANTUM LOGIC with sense-experience reality and the over-simplicity of BINARY LOGIC.  QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the including medium which captures the physical relational structure of reality wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED WAVE-FIELD PLENUM.  WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is OBSCURANTIST in that it employs a language architecture that “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE of the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD.  Since the FEMALE CONJUGATE is the INTEGRATING CONTAINER for MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, this OBSCURANTISM is leading to increasing FRAGMENTATION in BOTH the PSYCHE and SOCIAL DYNAMICS of WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS (as noted by Bohm).

 

This short essay describes the basics of this WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM wherein the all-including QUANTUM LOGIC  (wherein material forms are condensations of the ) WAVE-FIELD FLOW  is OBSCURED by LANGUAGE based SUBSTITUTION of notional INDEPENDENT MATERIAL FRAGMENTS notionally with ‘their own’ GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS and INTERACTIONS, as if situated within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.  This BINARY LOGIC OBSCURANTIST SUBSTITUTE REALITY is now our WESTERN CULTURE OPERATIVE REALITY which is leading to rising FRAGMENTATION in both WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHOLOGICAL and PHYSICAL REALMS.

 * * * 

 

 

LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM is a WESTERN CULTURE DYSFUNCTION coming from ERRORS in our “Common Average European” Language Architectures.  The Nietzsche-labelled ‘DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’ which sets up a notional LOCAL AUTHOR’ gives us the sense of a one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY world dynamic.

The WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE of WAVE-FIELD REALITY, can be seen, for example, where we reduce the QUANTUM LOGIC “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, where TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is given as the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING receptacle for the MALE ASSERTING TOWNING, … to the BINARY LOGIC ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products which has DROPPED OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING LANDSCAPE and reduces the impression of the transforming landscape to the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING REPRESENTATION OF THE TOWN THAT IS GROWING, … as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE’.

This DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR construction is LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM and it is BUILT IN to WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and thus it is built in to our common :LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION, or better, “LINGUISTIC MIS-REPRESENTATION” of REALITY.   To be clear, it is IMPOSSIBLE, in the spherical space of our sense-experience, for a TOWN to “GROW” without a SIMULTANEOUS SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS that the GROWING TOWN is ‘pushing into’.  This CONJUGATE RELATION of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING with MALE ASSERTING is basic to the WAVE-FIELD world of our sense-experience and there are problems where we reduce this ANDROGYNOUS reality to a one-sided MALE-ASSERTING substitute reality..

Meanwhile, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is ‘infected’ by LINGUISTIC OBSCURATISM wherein there is a DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE so that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS end up constructing a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is ONE-SIDEDLY MALE-ASSERTING, as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE (Euclidean) SPACE.

NOTA BENE:  In WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, EMPTY SPACE has been SUBSTITUTED for the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE so that it is NO LONGER POSSIBLE, in this simplified language, to capture the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein as Bohm declares, “SPACE IS FULL, A PLENUM AS OPPOSED TO A VACUUM” (a WAVE-FIELD in which MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the all-pervading WAVE-FIELD).

THIS WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS OBSCURANTIST in that it DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, making it appear as if the MALE ASSERTING is the FULL STORY and this is aided and abetted by Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite systems of Logical Propositions which lets up build SUBSTITUTE REALITIES based ONE-SIDEDLY on MALE ASSERTING actions and developments which are TRUE but at the same time INCOMPLETE.  Thus ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ fails to mention that, because we live in a spherical space, there is AT THE SAME TIME A FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS which “IS CAPTURED” in INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE where one would speak in terms of ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

What is going on here is LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM in the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which associates with the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE as we employ the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE “ON ITS OWN” as in ‘the TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’ which is all ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE has been the victim of an ‘OBSCURANTIST REMOVAL”.  The impossibility of the TOWN GROWING “WITHOUT” a CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS is STEAM-ROLLERED OVER by the OBSCURANTIST use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which simply states “the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products” as if this were playing out in a FLAT EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT without any acknowledging of the reality of our living in a spherical space wherein there is a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE TO EVERY MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT, as is duly captured in INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and in Bohm’s Modern physics Rheomode language BUT NOT IN OUR USE OF ENGLISH and the “Common Average European” (Whorf’s classification) Language architectures.

LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM IS BUILT INTO OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES and IT CONSTRAINS OUR LANGUAGE-based REPRESENTATIONS to ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING THAT IS CHARACTERISTIC OF REAL LIFE SENSE-EXPERIENCE.  For example, the THIN SKULL RULE of WESTERN JUSTICE forces us to accept that the damage associated with a punch to the head CAN ONLY BE SAID TO BE DUE TO THE EFFECT OF THE PUNCH, I.E. to be the purported RESULT/DEVELOPMENT/CONSEQUENCE … FULLY ATTRIBUTABLE to the MALE ASSERTING ACTION, even though the real sense-experience affirmable REALITY is that the ACCOMMODATING WEAKNESS OF THE EGG-SHELL-THIN SKULL was the MAJOR CONTRIBUTOR TO THE RESULTING SHATTERING OF THE SKULL.

HERE WE HAVE A COMMON SITUATION where the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE goes SOLELY with MALE ASSERTING representation “AS IF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE “DID NOT EXIST”; e.g. did the careless discarding of a cigarette butt CAUSE or “AUTHOR” the FOREST FIRE?   Or do we have to factor in the reality that the forest is a RAIN-FOREST which is usually sopping wet and will not ‘ignite’ but where in a hot summer it can become TINDER-DRY and ready to ignite with a small spark.  In other words, there is ALWAYS, IN OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE ALTHOUGH NOT ALWASY IN OUR LANGUAGE, a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING condition that partners up with the MALE ASSERTING STIMULUS.

It is only “a WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE CONVENTION”  that has us SIMPLIFY the language-based representation by the OBSCURANTISM of  DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and fashioning our LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION in the ONE-SIDED ONLY TERMS OF MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS. 

Instead of the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC relation wherein MALE ASSERTING AGENCY IS A CONDENSATION INCLUDED IN THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING FLOW, we have the BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC relation wherein we SUBSTITUTE EMPTY SPACE for the FEMALE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM and ‘PROMOTE’ the MALE-ASSERTING AGENT (which is, in reality, SCHAUMKOMMEN or in other words ‘APPEARANCE’ coming from CONDENSATION within the ENERGY-CHARGED WAVE-FIELD).

The key point here is that the MATERIAL FORMS which are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD-PLENUM, are “NOT” local material ‘things-in-themselves’ but ARE SECONDARY (condensation based) FEATURES WITHIN THE FLOWING, ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD, and as such, are deserving of a NAMING SCHEME which supports their secondary ‘APPEARANCE’ (flow-form) status. 

In the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGES as in Bohm’s QUANTUM LOGIC Rheomode language, there is NO FALLING INTO THE TRAP of BINARY LOGIC based REPRESENTATIONS of MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES-IN-EMPTY-SPACE that comes with NOUNS rather than VERBS, these ‘NOUNS’ imputing BEING-based status to NAMED FORMS, setting up the OBSCURANTIST impression of a world dynamic that is fully and solely activated by MALE-ASSERTING actions and developments.  On this basis we come up with the THIN SKULL RULE and the SPARK IGNITING THE FOREST FIRE RULE and the SKIER AUTHORING the AVALANCHE rule, all of which assign FULL AND SOLE AUTHORING responsibility to the MALE ASSERTING AGENT and NONE to the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE even when it is BLATANTLY OBVIOUS that the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE is the PRIMARY AUTHORING INFLUENCE.

 

SO, INSTEAD of the QUANTUM LOGIC impression conveyed by the CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ‘LANDSCAPE’ serving as CONTAINING VESSEL for MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT TO SPRING FORTH FROM, in WESTERN CULTURE OBSCURANTIST LANGUAGE, we construct a “SIMPLIFIED” BINARY LOGIC based REPRESENTATION in the ONE-SIDE MALE ASSERTING TERMS of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT. 

 

It is only “a WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE CONVENTION”  that has us SIMPLIFY the language-based representation by the OBSCURANTISM of  DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and fashioning our LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION in the ONE-SIDED ONLY TERMS OF MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS. 

* * *

 

ACHTUNG! NOTA BENE!  What the popular WESTERN CULTURE RECONSTRUCTIONS of REALITY based on the DIFFERENTIATION of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM set up, is a SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on FIXED FORMS to which we assign NAMES.  Instead of language architecture like the indigenous aboriginals which captures FLOW as with ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have architected language ANCHORED to LOCAL MATERIAL THINGS as with ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’

In the first case we have a reality that is in continuing NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT flux.  This is the QUANTUM LOGIC based language architecture chosen by indigenous aboriginals.

In the second case we have a pseudo-reality based on LOCAL, EXPLICIT, MATERIAL OBJECTS.  This the BINARY LOGIC based language architecture chosen by WESTERN CULTURE adherents.

in the first case, the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT is directly addressing the WAVE-FIELD.

in the second case, the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is addressing the MALE ASSERTING COMPONENT of the WAVE-FIELD which is which is referred to as the REAL COMPONENT of the COMPLEX VARIABLE which consists of REAL (MALE ASSERTING) and IMAGINARY (FEMALE ACCOMMODATING) CONJUGATES. 

While INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES capture the FULL WAVE-FIELD consisting of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATES, the WESTERN CULTURE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGES “DROP OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE aka the “IMAGINARY  COMPONENT” and employ ONLY the MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE; for example, ‘the AVALANCHE crashed down into the VALLEY and partially filled it in,.. CREDITS THE MALE ASSERTING WITH ALL OF THE “AUTHORING ACTION” which is a BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR architecture.

QUANTUM LOGIC is about BALANCE as in ‘the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein ‘there it AVALANCHING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, which acknowledges that the MALE ASSERTING AVALANCHING is in conjugate relational with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING of the VALLEY, these two conjugates, the material (a) breaking off and ‘shrinking the mountain’, and (b) being accommodated by and partially ‘filling in’ the valley.

NOTE THAT it is COMMON in the CAE languages, so speak only of the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE which is given by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR; i.e. ‘the AVALANCHE CRASHED DOWN THE MOUNTAINSIDE as if that is the full story, since in our WESTERN CULTURE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE based representations, we habitually (by the way we use language) DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE which means we REDUCE the QUANTUM LOGIC dynamic of our sense-experience, which is ANDROGYNOUS to a ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY DYNAMIC. This SIMPLIFEIS our language based representation in the same way the Copernicus SIMPLIFIED linguistic expression of the motion associated with the MATERIAL CONDENSATION within the ALL-INCLUDING ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE-FIELD PLENUM by saying ‘the EARTH TURNS ROUND’ which imposed BINARY LOGIC based SIMPLIFICTION on this QUANTUM LOGIC phenomenon of CONDENSATION in the WAVE-FIELD  PLENUM.

The LINGUISTIC SIMPLIFICATION described here in terms of the REDUCTION of QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY to simplified BINARY LOGIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY is only happening in a linguistic BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein we are THINKING ABSTRACTLY in the BINARY LOGIC TERMS OF the DYNAMICS of MATERIAL FORMS in a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

 

EXAMPLE of the REDUCTION from QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC linguistic representation and the associated shift from INTEGRATION to DIFFERENTIATION;

* * *

The BINARY LOGIC DIFFERENTIATION based linguistic rendering;

“THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products”;   Here, we use EITHER/OR BINARY LOGIC to DIFFERENTIATE ‘FIGURE and GROUND’ and REPRESENT the FIGURE (TOWN) with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as a “LOCAL, EXPLICIT  AUTHOR of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT”; a construction which can be (and is) repeated without limit in language usage, leading to the construction of a hugely FRAGMENTED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which confuses the WESTERN CULTURE language-user psyche as Bohm points out.

 * * *

The QUANTUM LOGIC INTEGRATION based linguistic rendering; 

“THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”;  Here, we use BOTH/AND QUANTUM LOGIC to INTEGRATE the MALE and FEMALE CONJUGATES of the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD reality, serving up a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) IMPRESSION of the ALL-INCLUDING, TRANSFORMING PLENUM that serves as containing vessel for the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.

  * * *

Note that if we START WITH THE QUANTUM LOGIC OVERVIEW “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, we have the overall ‘sense’ of “OUR” INTEGRATION within the NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT and this SETS THE STAGE for SCRUTINIZING with our Crow’s eye DIFFERENTIATING focus, the LOCAL and EXPLICIT detail of “THE TOWN”.  

Sometimes I go about in pity for myself and all the while a great wind is bearing me across the sky.’ — Ojibwa

It is EVIDENT that indigenous aboriginal language IS GROUNDED IN QUANTUM LOGIC while WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT language IS GROUNDED IN BINARY LOGIC which builds representations based on DIFFERENTIATION.

DIFFERENTIATION can be ‘ABSTRACTED’ from INTEGRATION; e.g. starting with the resonance of TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE or ant CLUSTERING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, … we can let our eyes kind of glaze over and see the ENVELOPE to the GATHERING-SCATTERING dynamics of the people-TOWNING and the ant-CLUSTERING and this ENVELOPE gives us a basis for speaking in terms of ‘the TOWN’ and ‘the CLUSTER’ even though the reality is the RESONANCE FEATURES (WAVE-FIELD features).

In other words, when we come up with the label ‘the TOWN’, it is like REDUCING the variable ‘TOWNING’ to a CONSTANT as in the DIFFERENTIATION OPERATION in MATHEMATICS.   Likewise in the case where we come up with the label ‘the CLUSTER’, it is like REDUCING the variable ‘CLUSTERING’ to a CONSTANT as in the DIFFERENTIATION OPERATION.

What GOES MISSING in MATHEMATICS and also in this physical model is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) structure of the LANDSCAPE.  In other words, we DIFFERENTIATE OUT the FIGURE (TOWN or CLUSTER) from the GROUND (the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) and there is a LOSS OF INFORMATION which comes with this FRAGMENTATION because we can’t take small LOCAL EXPLICIT FRAGMENTS out of a complex long term history without a loss of information. This is a WAVE-FIELD related sampling problem; i.e. if we CHOP out small samples, we lose the LOW FREQUENCY (LONG WAVE-LENGTH) INFORMATION and thus we are unable to RE-INTEGRATE and recover the full PRE-DIFFERENTIATED reality.

IT IS BINARY LOGIC THAT PERFORMS AS A DIFFERENTIATION OPERATOR SO THAT IF WE DON’T USE BINARY LOGIC BUT INSTEAD USE QUANTUM LOGIC (which implicitly incorporates within it, BINARY LOGIC, as shown in Erich Jantsch’s Three Levels of Reality), then we won’t run into the DIFFERENTIATION and associated FRAGMENTATION problem. 

By contrast, in the indigenous aboriginal culture, the ‘HEALING CIRCLE’ is a manifestation of the understanding that emergent actions and developments, while they may manifest through an individual as CONDUIT or LIGHTNING ROD, do not ORIGINATE within the individual.  In other words, the individual-as-conduit is NOT the AUTHOR.  The quantum logic understanding of dynamics has no place for LOCAL AUTHORING.   The individual that is a CONDENSATION of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD and thus a CONDUIT for the release of energies that build up within the CONDENSATION BASED SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, is, again, NOT the LOCAL AUTHOR.

 

CONCLUSION, WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS RUN INTO FRAGMENTATION PROBLEMS because of our use of LANGUAGE incorporating BINARY LOGIC while Indigenous aboriginals do not have the same problem because of their language architecture which is QUANTUM LOGIC based.

* * * * * *

SEE LEADOFF: AUTHOR’S SUMMARY of; Linguistic OBSCURANTISM in Western Culture Language Architecture