WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC OBSCURING OF THE WAVE-FIELD NATURE OF REALITY

FORWARD/OVERVIEW to: The Tricky Linguistics of Wave-Field PEAK and TROUGH

This STORY, TOLD DIRECTLY, is that we live in a WAVE-FIELD world which means that our LANGUAGE, in order to convey our ACTUAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE must be capable of conveying ANDROGYNOUS dynamics, wherein the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING agency and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING recipient ARE ONLY ONE.  This is describing the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the MALE ASSERTING is INCLUDED IN the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING, as in TRANSFORMATION.

ACHTUNG! NOTA BENE!  WHERE WHESTERN CULTURE IS GOING WRONG in developing a LANGUAG HABIT (linguistic conceptualizing habit) which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate (i.e. the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM) by substituting ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE and KEEPING ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, as is the now popular WESTERN CULTURE language usage, which is equivalent to INVENTING A NEW ABSTRACT PSEUDO-REALITY based ON BINARY LOGIC wherin the PRIMARY physical phenomen;i.e. the WAVE-FIELD, is OBSCURED while in its place there remains ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate as if operating NOT AS A CONDENSATION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM but as a NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE, INDEPENDENT MATERIAL THING-IN-ITSELF moving and developing WITHIN A NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH CAREFULLY because what I have learned in my philosophical explorations into how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are “SCREWING UP OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING”, is that while our sense-experience is of our living in a QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC world wherein material forms BOTH THEMSELVES AND AT THE SAME TIME, THEIR CONTAINING MEDIUM (e.g. consider a WHORLING in a FLOWING.  In this sitation, ‘THE WHORLING IS THE FLOWING’; i.e. it is part of the APPEARANCE of flowing and THE WHORLING is “NOT” a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF, but only an ‘APPEARANCE’.  That applies generally so that, for example, while there is HUMANING and TOWNING and FORESTING in the WAVE-FIELD (aka the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM), there are no LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES as are referred to as HUMANS, TOWNS and FORESTS, notionally with THEIR OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS such as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods.

This understanding of reality as an all-including energy-charged plenum bearing within it material condensations is the understanding of MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.

In this reality (Modern physics and Eastern/indigenous aboriginal reality), LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is FLOW-BASED and FLOW is QUANTUM LOGIC

wer have to describe the fact that the WAVE-FIELD energy is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and is PRIMARY while the LOCAL and EXPLICIT energy is APPEARANCE.   We may give credit to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT for actions and development but that is only APPEARANCE (Scheumkommen) and real credit for actions and developmment is coming from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

The LOCAL and EXPLICIT statement; “the men are constructing a village in the countryside ” makes NO MENTION of the REALITY of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS in which case the CONSTRUCTION OF THE VILLAGE “IS NOT REALITY” but is only APPEARANCE and if we ‘add back in’ the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS, we get the LESS SIMPLIFIED UNDERSTAND OF REALITY as the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE that includes “BOTH” the CONSTRUCTION of the VILLAGE “AND” the conjugate schrinking of WILDERNESS.

While the FLOW-BASED linguages of indigenous aboriginals and MODERN PHYSICS serves up LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which includes, in a TWO-IN-ONE sense, “BOTH” the GROWTH of the VILLAGE “AND” the onjugate SHRINKING of WILDERNESS which, taken together, are the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are in the habit of using a simplified form of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION that employ only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate and DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, substituting in its place, ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

 * * * * * * * 

What I want to emphasize, because it tends to get LOST IN THE SHUFFLE, is that we cannot TRUST LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that treats WAVE-PEAK and WAVE-TROUGH as TWO SEPARATE THINGS which is what BINARY LOGIC allows us to do, and then we say that the WAVE-PEAK is PUSHING (asserting) and the WAVE-TROUGH is PULLING (accommodating) and after we do this, WESTERN CULTURE EGOTISTS will affirm that the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate “IS DOING ALL THE WORK” and we may as well DROP OUT MENTION of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate and simplify our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING by employ ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.

This is what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE NOW DOING, but as Nietzsche has pointed out, this is achieved with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  This gives us a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING capability that supports FRAGMENTATION because ONCE ONE GETS RID OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, which BRINGS TO BEAR the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD ASPECT, we have unleashed a DUMBED DOWN LANGUAGE that is capable of producing FRAGMENTED perspectives which are LOCAL and EXPLICIT, as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINTITE SPACE.

The KEY THING HERE IS THAT THE GRAND SCREW-UP IN WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS is coming from the WESTERN CULTURE ABSTRACT, LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING where we (A) SPLIT UP the WAVE-FIELD into TWO SEPARATE PARTS; e.g. the PEAK and the TROUGH.   This is NONSENSE because while the PEAK appears to be LOCAL and EXPLICIT, the TROUGH is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is NOT STAND-ALONE CONTENT but is CONTENT that must be INFORMED BY NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT RELATIONAL CONTEXT.

The DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, as pointed out by Nietzsche, is a recipe FRAGMENTATION in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  We may say that the WAVE-PEAKS keep bashing the stranded boat against the reocks but it is the WAVE-TROUGH that keeps sucking it back in and setting it up from another WAVE-PEAK bashing.

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are IMPRESSED by the WAVE-PEAK, the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING  and are employing LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING wherein we credit THE WAVE-PEAK with CRASHING INTO THE CROCKS as if it were legitimate to understanding such phenomena in one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALING ONLY TERMS; i.e. in LOCAL and EXPLICIT TERMS without taking into consideration the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT influence of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING  WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.   Linguistic conceptualization-wise, it is far simpler to STICK TO the LOCAL and EXPLICIT as if there was NO NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT INFLUENCE, thus while vionce in an indigenous aboriginal culture manifests, the entire community comes together in a HEALING CIRCLE sine the ASSUMPTION IS that the violence derives from the INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT social relational matrix in which case the INDIVDUAL HOLDING THE SMOKING GUN is the CONDUIT BUT VIOLENT ENERGY RELEASE but NOT THE SOURCE.

WESTERN CULTURE, by using LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING TO (A) EMPLOY NAMING to IDENTIFY A LOCAL AUTHOR and (B) EMPLOY GRAMMAR ‘ARM’ the NAMING-INSTANTIATED NOTIONAL ‘AUTHOR’, imputes a LOCAL AUTHORING SOURCE for everything. This LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that imputes LOCAL AUTHORING of events, must first EXPLAIN AWAY that everything is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT in nature (Which makes sense when we understand we are living in a relational matrix wherein EVERYTHING is INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT.

show nietzsche quote on DOUBLE ERROR HERE.

& &  & & 7

For those peoples or tribes whose languages ackowledge that we are living in a WAVE-FIELD, as indigenous aboriginals IN EFFECT acknowledge with their understandIng expressed by MITAKUYE OYASIN (everything is related) which is the QUANTUM LOGIC relation; i.e. the BOTH/AND logic of the including medium where SPACE is NOT EMPTY, IT IS FULL; i.e. it is the all-including WAVE-FIELD wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD.  These CONDENSATIONS are, at the same time, BOTH themselves, material condensations AND, at the same time, the ENERGY-CHARGED-MEDIUM (aka WAVE-FIELD) they are included in.  This QUANTUM LOGIC relation is exemplified by the WHORLING in the FLOWING in a stream or in the atmosphere; i.e. the WHORLING “APPEARS to be an INDEPENDENT THING but that is just APPEARANCE or as Schroedinger says ‘Schaumkommen’.

As Heraclitus said, and as reaffirmed by indigenous aboriginals, and by Nietzsche and Bohm, EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.  This is how it is when one lives in a WAVE-FIELD reality as we all do.

NOW COMES LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, and as Nietzsche pointed out, in our WESTERN CULTURE, EGO has progressively pushed the notion that HUMANS are INDEPENDENT BEING, notionally with their own POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, hence WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS identify individuals are LOCAL AUTHORS of particular material actions, development and production.

POST-SHAKESPEAREAN WESTERN CULTURE

The TRICKY LINGUISTICS of Wave-Field PEAK and TROUGH

The “WAVE-PEAK” is treated of in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING as a LOCAL and EXPLICIT “BEING” based influence.  This is Schaumkommen (Appearance), that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE and THINKING “PORTRAYS” in a BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC sense as if THE “WAVE-PEAK” (there is no such thing in sense-experience reality as a “WAVE-PEAK” since WAVES DO NOT SPLIT into a PEAK and a TROUGH; i.e. the PEAK and TROUGH form is only ‘APPEARANCE’‘.

In using ‘APPEARANCE’ as the basis for LINGUISTIC DISCUSSION of WAVE-FIELD dynamics, we speak of a ‘WAVE’ as having BOTH a PEAK and a TROUGH and in WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing, we speak of a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENCY that is fully and solely responsible for LOCAL and EXPLICIT actions and development; e.g. ‘The waves crashed into the beached boat and demolished it.’  Though, in sense-experience affirmed actuality, the WAVE-TROUGH repetitively pulled the boat partly off the rocks before the WAVE-PEAK returned to hammer it into and onto the rocks, our standard WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing mentions ONLY the WAVE-PEAK action which is the BINARY LOGIC “LOCAL, EXPLICIT” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-PEAK ACTION.

The “WAVE-TROUGH” is something NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT,  which is A PURELY RELATIONAL influence that is without its own BEING,   which, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE and THINKING is PORTRAYED in a SECONDARY LIGHT, as if it were the PASSIVE INTERVAL BETWEEN TWO ACTIVE PEAKS; i.e. as if the PEAKS were LOCAL, EXPLICIT, “INDEPENDENT” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING  AGENTS, while the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING TROUGHS WERE SECONDARY NON-CONTRIBUTING ‘FILLERS-IN’ like the SPANDREL in Cathedral architecture.

THE HUMONGOUS ERROR of WESTERN CULTURE is the DESIGNING of LANGUAGE that FALSELY PROMOTES THE “LOCAL AND EXPLICIT WAVE-PEAK TO PRIMARY ACTION SOURCING AGENT WHILE DROPPING OUT THE ACTUAL PRIMARY ACTION SOURCING AGENT; i.e THE “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-TROUGH.

The SPLITTING OUT of the WAVE-PEAK and setting it up ON ITS OWN, requires the ABSTRACT NULLING OUT of its WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, the WAVE-TROUGH, which is in reality, the PRIMARY AGENCY since the WAVE-FIELD is innately NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT while its LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING “DUMB-DOWN” to “LOCAL and EXPLICIT” is “APPEARANCE” based; i.e. THERE IS NOTHING LOCAL AND EXPLICIT ABOUT WAVE-FIELD PHENOMENA.

The terms NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT DESCRIBE THE BASIC NATURE OF THE WAVE-FIELD and the fact that WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS LIMIT OUR FOCUS to certain aspects of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) and use LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is supported by what Nietzsche has pointed out is a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, to come up with a reduction to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT does not mean that such SIMPLIFYING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING (e.g. BINARY LOGIC MATERIAL BEINGS IN EMPTY SPACE) is in accord with the QUANTUM LOGIC world of our SENSE EXPERIENCE  (e.g. QUANTUM LOGIC CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM AKA WAVE-FIELD).

THE “LOCAL and EXPLICIT” PEAKS together with THE “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT” TROUGH comprise the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC.  The perceived MULTIPLICITY of LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘INDEPENDENT’ PEAKS are only APPEARANCE but have been given FOUNDATIONAL STATUS in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING practice, SHUTTING OUT the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TROUGH which is a LESS SIMPLE FOUNDATION WHEREIN ALL MATERIAL THINGS ARE RELATED BY VIRTUE OF ALL MATERIAL THINGS BEING CONDENSATIONS OF THE ONE, ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM AKA WAVE-FIELD. 

TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE 

SECONDARY DERIVATIVE UNDERSTANDINGS

I could, or should, put an UPFRONT notice on EVERYTHING I WRITE in which I say that “I BELIEVE WE LIVE IN A WAVE-FIELD WORLD wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.  This means that there is a QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM relation between MATERIAL FORMS and the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

In this WAVE-FIELD WORLD “EVERYTHING IS RELATED” since all MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM. THIS IS THE WORLD of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE, wherein the All-INCLUDING ENERGY CHARGED PLENUM IS UNDERGOING TRANSFORMATION.

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

The above AFFIRMATION of our living, as CONDENSATIONS, in an ALL-INCLUDING ENEGY-CHARGED PLENUM means that WE ARE ALL RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) and that STRIFE is RELATIONAL DISSONANCE while HARMONY is RELATIONAL RESONANCE.  EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX in our WAVE-RIELD WORLD so that while there may be RELATIONAL RESONANCE and RELATIONAL DISSONANCE that manifests in the relational matrix, such actions are purely relational and there is NO LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments as there is in the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC  “MATTER AND EMPTY SPACE” based WESTERN CULTURE WORLD.

* * * * * * *

In my WESTERN CULTURE UPBRINGING, I was taught a LANGUAGE or LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that is NOT QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD based but is instead BINARY LOGIC MECHANICS based; i.e. based on notional ABSOLUTE BEING based MATERIAL OBJECTS that move about and interact in a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

This BINARY LOGIC division into MATTER and EMPTY SPACE shifts the ENTIRE AUTHORING AGENCY to MATERIAL FORMS aka MALE AUTHORING/ACTUALIZING and REMOVES all AUTHORING powers from the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, reducing it to an EMPTY SPACE.  This leaves a REALITY based on ONE-SIDED, MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING by way of MATERIAL AGENTS operating in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.   This is akin to splitting apart the WAVE-FIELD into PEAKS and TROUGHS and KEEPING ONLY the PEAKS (the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING) as requires only BINARY LOGIC while DROPPING OUT the TROUGHS (the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING) which requires QUANTUM LOGIC.  So, for example, we speak of the GROWTH OF THE TOWN which is the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE ‘PEAK’ but DROPS OUT MENTION of the conjugate SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS. which is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING (WAVE ‘TROUGH’).

TOGETHER, THE PEAK AND TROUGH constitute TRANSFORMATION, however, it is the modern practice in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE USAGE, to make what Nietzsche calls THE DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR and to (a) SPLIT the WAVE into PEAK and TROUGH and (b) DROP OUT the TROUGH and SUBSTITUTE ABSOLUTE INFINITE SPACE making it seem as if the PEAK; i.e. the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, is the full and sole SOURCING AGENT which is APPEARANCE (Schaumkommen) WAVE-FIELDS are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.   NOTA BENA; … the TROUGH is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT conjugate of the WAVE-FIELD which is the full and sole SOURCING AGENCY, while the PEAK that is LOCAL and EXPLICIT is NOT REAL but Schaumkommen (Schroedinger) aka APPEARANCE.

THERE IS NOTHING “LOCAL and EXPLICIT” about WAVE-FIELDS other than APPEARANCE.  Once one starts speaking in terms of LOCAL EXPLICIT PEAKS with THEIR own powers of MOVEMENT and DEVELOPMENT, we are imputing “BEING” to the LOCAL, EXPLICIT PEAKS and saying ‘The WAVES CRASHED AGAINST THE ROCKS, we have REDUCED the WAVE-DYNAMIC from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT to a MATERIAL DYNAMIC which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT.

Indigenous aboriginals and Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents whose LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING schemes are FLOW-BASED (i.e. based on the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TROUGH) AND DO NOT ELEVATE the LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘PEAK’ to an UNNATURAL PRECEDENCE OVER THE TROUGH as is the case in the WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC (PEAK based) linguistic conceptualizing scheme.  For example, while indigenous aboriginals use QUANTUM LOGIC linguistic conceptualization such as “There is TOWNING in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” wherein everything is in flux) and where the CONDENSATION is INCLUDED WITHIN THE FLOWING (TRANSFORMING) ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, … we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using linguistic conceptualizations based on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘PEAK’

THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT IS ONLY ‘APPEARANCE’ (Schoedinger, Bohm, Nietsche); i.e. the PEAK is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and there is NOTHING IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, that is LOCAL and EXPLICIT other than ‘APPEARANCE”.

The NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT is the REALITY of the all-including TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD “FEMALE TROUGH” which is innately LESS SIMPLE THAN, … and cannot be REDUCED to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT “MALE PEAK” since the latter does not match the reality of our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum wherein everything is in flux.

The point is that “THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT” DOES NOT EXIST IN REALITY; i.e. NOT IN THE REALITY OF THE ALL-INCLUDING, TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka THE WAVE-FIELD wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX. The ‘LOCAL and EXPLICIT’ derives from our IMPOSING the ABSTRACTION of BEING, … WHICH CAN ONLY BE DONE AT THE EXPENSE of IMPOSING THE BINARY LOGIC OPPOSITE OF ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT as the OPERATIONAL PLAYING FIELD.  OPENING THE DOOR TO the BINARY LOGIC based notion of MATERIAL BEINGS moving about and interacting in ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE is what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are employing in a foundational role in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.

This is equivalent to giving FULL and SOLE ACTION AUTHORING POWER to “THE PEAK” (which is “LOCAL and EXPLICIT”) and thus shutting out ACKNOWLEDGING OF ACTION AUTHORING POWER from “THE TROUGH” (which is NONLOCAL, and IMPLICIT)

NO! NO! NO!    THERE IS NO ‘LOCAL AND EXPLICIT’, that is only Schaumkommen (APPEARANCE) as Schroedinger points out, and just because WESTERN CULTURE has chosen to give the “LOCAL and  EXPLICIT” “THE”  FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, is a reminder of Giordano Bruno’s point that ‘A MAJORITY is not grounds for establishing ‘the TRUTH’.

….. IMPORTANT, … in the PEAK and TROUGH dichotomy, the PEAK is something LOCAL and EXPLICIT and UNREAL while the TROUGH is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and is our sense-experience affirmed REALITY.

“WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC OBSCURING OF THE WAVE-FIELD NATURE of REALITY… points to how  we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have designed a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that substitutes a BINARY LOGIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on the abstract notion of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL DYNAMICS  …. in place of …. the QUANTUM LOGIC sense-experience affirmed reality based on NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION.

 * * * * * * * *