UNDERSTANDING How DIFFERENTIATION and INTEGRATION figure in WESTERN CULTURE “FRAGMENTATION”
POSTSCRIPT TO: UNDERSTANDING How DIFFERENTIATION and INTEGRATION figure in WESTERN CULTURE “FRAGMENTATION”
IF WE START FROM THE LAST NOTE, … THE KEY PREMISE CAN BE FOUND IN THE DISCUSSION OF THE ‘THIN SKULL RULE’. EVEN THOUGH WE KNOW FULL WELL THAT THE MALE ASSERTING PUNCH IS INSUFFICIENT TO EXPLAIN THE COLLAPSING OF THE THIN SKULL, … since this ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ACTION IS INNATELY TOO SIMPLE and IN BASIC CONTRADICTION TO THE WAVE-FIELD understanding of reality THE FEMALE_ACCOMMODATING—MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE understanding aka the Yin/Yang understanding, … which is embraced not only by INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS BUT ALSO AFFIRMED BY MODERN PHYSICS.
I AM SIMPLY AFFIRMING, and HAVE SAID NOTHING HERE TO CONTRADICT, .. THE GREAT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ON THIS TOPIC AS AFFIRMED BY BUDDHISTS AND BY BOHM and NIETZSCHE and SCHROEDINGER and WITTGENSTEIN AND OTHERS, …
SO THE SCRUTINIZING OF THIS NOTE NEED NOT GO BACK TO REVIEWING THOSE QUANTUM LOGIC UNDERSTANDINGS, the SCRUTINY NEEDS TO GO TO WHY WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS CONTINUE TO EMPLOY BINARY LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE TO CONSTRUCT REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY WHEN WE KNOW THAT OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE REALITY CONFORMS WITH QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE.
WHY? THE ANSWER IS CLEAR. IN SYSTEMS TERMS, “WE ARE LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS”. DO WE WANT TO FACE UP TO THE “COST” IN “SOCIAL RE-ADJUSTMENT TERMS” IN OUR BINARY LOGIC INFUSED SOCIAL RELATIONAL COMMON PRACTICES, OF “UPGRADING” FROM “BINARY LOGIC” TO “QUANTUM LOGIC” AS IS CALLED FOR IN THE “UPGRADE” FROM “NEWTONIAN BINARY LOGIC BASED REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY WHICH ARE OF A MECHANISTIC (ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY ) “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”?
ANSWER: The SWITCHING COSTS ARE HUGE AND INCLUDE;
-1- REVAMPING THE WESTERN JUSTICE SYSTEM. MODERN PHYSICS CONFIRMS THAT THE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM ‘MAKES SENSE’ IN THAT IT IS BASED ON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT WE LIVE IN A RELATIONAL WORLD WHEREIN THERE IS NO SUCH THING, … AS THERE IS ASSUMED TO BE IN WESTERN JUSTICE, … AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” as is supported in WESTERN CULTURE GENERALLY and which is ABSTRACTION coming from the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE; i.e. from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which IMPUTES “LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments” and which is used to construct a LOCAL AUTHORING BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, while all the while, our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is informing us we share inclusion in a transforming relational continuum (aka the WAVE-FIELD) wherein the dynamics are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational). IN OTHER WORDS, “LOCAL AUTHORING” IS A SCAM! IT IS THE PRODUCT OF THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR.
This PARTICULAR ERROR, ‘the DOUBLE ERROR’, RADICALLY REVISES WESTERN CULTURE CONCEPTS OF JUSTICE, MEDICINE and COMMERCE, and thus the FOUNDATIONAL STRUCTURE OF WESTERN CULTURE ADMINISTRATION SYSTEMS, all of which are HEAVILY SHAPED by the influence of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which IMPUTES “LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments”
SO, NIETZSCHE POINTED THIS OUT in the 1890’s so that we have had 130 years to ponder THE JUSTIFIED ALLEGATION THAT our western culture social dynamic is INFECTED with the infusing of the DOUBLE ERROR in our everyday LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTIONS, so that during these 130 years, OTHERS, including DAVID BOHN, have RE-AFFIRMED IT and ADDED SUPPORT IN THE SCIENTIFIC AND MATHEMATICAL TERMS THAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS SEEM TO GIVE MORE CREDENCE TO THAN OUR OWN SENSE-EXPERIENCE, WHICH IS, AND HAS FOR A LONG TIME, BEEN TELLING US THE SAME THING; i.e. that we are living in a ‘transforming relational continuum’ (WAVE-FIELD) and that material forms such as ourselves are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin)
SO WHAT ARE WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS WAITING FOR? WE KNOW THAT OUR MODEL OF REALITY IN THE BINARY LOGIC TERMS OF MATTER AND EMPTY SPACE IS TOTAL BULLSHIT. THERE IS NO SUPPORT FOR IT. AS BENJAMIN WHORF HAS SHOWN, THAT SIMPLE NEWTONIAN BINARY LOGIC MODEL ACTUALLY CAME FROM THE COMMON POPULAR WESTERN SPOKEN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and NOT from our observations of NATURE. NATURE’S DYNAMICS are relational transformation based (which can be modeled with QUANTUM LOGIC but BINARY LOGIC is an OVER-SIMPLISTIC, MISLEADING SUBSTITUTION). QUANTUM LOGIC describes the relations wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD so that CONTENT/FIGURE and CONTAINER/GROUND ARE ONE, and since we are included in the COMMON GROUND of the WAVE-FIELD, as Schroedinger points out, SUBJECT AND OBJECT ARE ONLY ONE; i.e. the things we are looking out at are ‘part of’ us since the WAVE-FIELD is all-inclusive.
SURE, that is sufficient to give one the sense of an ALL-INCLUDING CREATIVE PLENUM of the likes of the indigenous aboriginal ‘GREAT HARMONY’ and points to the QUANTUM LOGIC understandings of reality of INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS, but POINTS AWAY FROM THE WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY WHICH SPLITS MATERIAL FORMS OUT OF THE PLENUM, RE-CASTING THEM AS INDEPENDENT MATERIAL OBJECTS IN A NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.
* * * * * *
The SCRUTINY NEEDS TO GO TO WHY WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS CONTINUE TO EMPLOY BINARY LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE TO CONSTRUCT REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY WHEN WE KNOW THAT OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE REALITY CONFORMS WITH QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE
WHY? THE ANSWER IS CLEAR. IN SYSTEMS TERMS, “WE ARE LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS”.
DO WE WANT TO FACE UP TO “COST” IN “SOCIAL RE-ADJUSTMENT TERMS” IN OUR BINARY LOGIC INFUSED SOCIAL RELATIONAL COMMON PRACTICES, OF “UPGRADING” FROM “BINARY LOGIC” TO “QUANTUM LOGIC” AS IS CALLED FOR IN THE “UPGRADE” FROM “NEWTONIAN BINARY LOGIC BASED REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY WHICH ARE OF A MECHANISTIC (ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY) “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”?
ANSWER: The SWITCHING COSTS ARE HUGE AND INCLUDE;
-1- REVAMPING THE WESTERN JUSTICE SYSTEM: MODERN PHYSICS CONFIRMS THAT THE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM ‘MAKES SENSE’ IN THAT IT IS BASED ON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT WE LIVE IN A RELATIONAL WORLD WHEREIN THERE IS NO SUCH THING, … AS THERE IS IN WESTERN JUSTICE, … AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” as is supported in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTICS GENERALLY and which is ABSTRACTION coming from the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE; i.e. from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which IMPUTES “LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments” and which is used to construct a LOCAL AUTHORING BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, while all the while, our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is informing us that we share inclusion in a transforming relational continuum (aka the WAVE-FIELD) wherein the dynamics are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational). IN OTHER WORDS, “LOCAL AUTHORING” IS A SCAM! IT IS THE PRODUCT OF THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR.
This PARTICULAR ERROR, ‘the DOUBLE ERROR’, RADICALLY REVISES WESTERN CULTURE CONCEPTS OF JUSTIICE, MEDICINE and COMMERCE, and thus the FOUNDATIONAL STRUCTURE OF WESTERN CULTURE ADMINISTRATION SYSTEMS, all of which are HEAVILY SHAPED by the influence of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that IMPUTES “LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments”
So, the QUESTION WE MUST POSE TO OURSELVES IS “NOT” “WHAT IS WRONG WITH US WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS?”. WE KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT ONE (as given by Nietzsche and Bohm), the MORE DIFFICULT QUESTION IS: SINCE THE PROBLEM IS THAT WE HAVE DUMBED DOWN OUR WESTERN CULTURE THINKING TO A BINARY LOGIC REPRESENTATION BASIS, WHILE LIVING IN A QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY WHICH REQUIRES A QUANTUM LOGIC “LINGUISTIC-INTELLECTUAL” UNDERSTANDING, OUR PROBLEM IS “NOT” THAT “WE ARE DOING SOMETHING WRONG” OUR PROBLEM IS THAT WE ARE DOING WHAT WOULD MAKE SENSE IF “THE REALITY WE SPEAK OF AS BEING THE REALITY”, WERE “THE ACTUAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY”, WHICH IT IS NOT! So the PROBLEM IS THAT THE REALITY WE ARE PRESUMING WE ARE INCLUDED IN WHICH IS A BINARY LOGIC REALITY, IS NOT THE REALITY OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION THEREIN WHICH IS THE QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY.
THUS, THE REMEDY FOR OUR WESTERN CULTURE ILLS IS THE UPGRADING OF OUR LANGUAGE-BASED INTELLECTUAL REPRESENTATION OF REALITY SO THAT WE CAN INTELLECTUALLY ENGAGE WITH A REALITY THAT ‘MATCHES’ OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, instead of developing physical responses ORIENTING TO A SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY.
Until we, as a global social collective, upgrade our language-based representation of reality from BINARY LOGIC to QUANTUM LOGIC, our destiny is like that of Don Quixote, bravely tilting at windmills, creating more conflicts than we resolve.
* * * * * *
UNDERSTANDING How DIFFERENTIATION and INTEGRATION figure in WESTERN CULTURE “FRAGMENTATION”
The ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ in WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE is the TIP OF THE ICEBERG with respect to how WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “LIMITS OUR UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY” and thus SPLITS OFF OUR LANGUAGE BASED UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY FROM OUR SENESE-EXPERIENCE UNDERSTANDING of REALITY.
We live in a WAVE-FIELD world and that is a fact that comes to us through our DIRECT SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD, and here I mean INCLUSION in the QUANTUM LOGIC “BOTH/AND” sense as describes MATERIAL FORMS as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD such that FIGURE and GROUND are only ONE; i.e. the MATERIAL FIGURE is a CONDENSATION of the AlL-INCLUDING PLENUM (the ENERGY-FILLED GROUND aka ‘THE WAVE-FIELD’.
Now, that is our physical reality affirmed by our sense-experience of inclusion therein, .. but when we come to TALK ABOUT OUR REALITY, … we employ LANGUAGE to do so, and just as there are DIFFERENT STROKES FOR DIFFERENT FOLKS, there are different LANGUAGES for …. DIFFERENT SOCIAL COLLECTIVES, … and these DIFFERENT LANGUAGES are the basis for constructing DIFFERENT SHAREABLE REALITY REPRESENTATIONS.
While Korzybski reminds us that ‘the Word is not the Thing’, we could go farther and say ‘the LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATION of REALITY is NOT THE SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY’ (of inclusion in the all-including WAVE-FIELD), and by the way, Korzybski CONFUSES the issue by making reference to ‘the THING’ because THERE ARE NO “THINGS” in our sense-experience reality of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX or in other words, the relational forms in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD, which is the QUANTUM LOGIC nature of sense-experience reality..
THE THIN-SKULL RULE embodies an important insight into the SHORTFALL in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE in that we have designed a language that CONSTRAINS LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY to the MALE-ASSERTING ‘WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE’, stripping it out of the full-blown FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD PROPER (the coniunctio oppositurm) by our act of SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the FEMALE-ACCOMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.
The FRANKENSTEINIAN LINGUISTIC PSEUDO-REALITY REPRESENTATIONS we thus come up with are LOP-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITIES which are MECHANISTIC; i.e. constituted by MATERIAL OBJECTS in EMPTY SPACE that we animate with GRAMMAR within LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS consisting SOLELY of MALE ASSERTING MATERIAL FORMS that move about and interact in a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, … so that ALL WE HAVE TO PAY ATTENTION TO, in this REDUCED, MALE-ASSERTING ONLY ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ are the MATERIAL FORMS that we DIFFERENTIATE by our use of LINGUISTIC ‘NAMING’ and follow up by ANIMATING the DIFFERENTIATED FORMS with GRAMMAR.
This DIFFERENTIATION of the MATERIAL FORMS which are CONDENSATIONS IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD AND RE-SITUATING THEM IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE REFERENCE FRAME, … IS A SIMPLIFYING REPRESENTATION which FALSELY PROMOTES THE CONDENSATIONS IN THE WAVE-FIELD, ELEVATING THEM FROM THEIR ACTUAL SECONDARY STATUS, TO PRIMARY STATUS, THANKS TO SUBSTITUTING EMPTY SPACE FOR THE PRIMARY WAVE-FIELD REALITY, … which brings us back to the THIN SKULL RULE, wherein we are REMINDED that our LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION SCHEME ‘WORKS’ by REDUCING our ANDROGYNOUS SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY in which MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, … To a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein the PRIMARY WAVE-FIELD REALITY is REPLACED BY ‘EMPTY SPACE’ and the CONDENSATIONS IN THE WAVE-FIELD, i.e. these LOCAL, EXPLICIT offspring, have been GRAMMATICALLY ENDOWED WITH PARENT STATUS; i.e. with LOCAL AUTHORING POWER. This is a LINGUISTIC ENGINEERING OF A NEW SUBSTITUTE REALITY with a BINARY LOGIC MATERIAL BEINGS IN EMPTY SPACE STRUCTURE that supports ANIMATIONS in the one-sided terms of MALE-ASSERTING ACTIONS and developments.
The THIN-SKULL RULE is exemplary of HOW WE HAVE TO FORCE-FIT OUR REPRESENTATION OF WAVE-FIELD DYNAMICS into this ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY LANGUISTIC REPRESENTATION SCHEME which has DROPPED OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING that is innate in our sense-experience of inclusion in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.
The THIN-SKULL RULE obliges us to PRETEND, in our LANGUAGE-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY REPRESENTATIONS that WAVE-FIELD REALITY DOES NOT EXIST and that we should WALK-THE-TALK we are concocting on the basis of the SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is now constrained to MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES moving about an interacting as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.
GOODBYE ANDROGYNOUS SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, HELLO ABSTRACT LINGUISTIC BINARY LOGIC BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY! TOTO, I’M AFRAID WE ARE NO LONGER IN KANSAS (SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY) because as far as our LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATIONS are concerned, WE ARE IN A NEW SUBSTITUTE REALITY WHERE THE PRIMARY REALITY OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD WITH ITS INTERNAL CONDENSATIONS HAS BEEN REPLACED BY AN EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT PUNCTUATED LOCALLY (thanks to BINARY LOGIC) with EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS IN THEMSELVES GIFTED WITH THEIR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT (thanks to GRAMMAR).
OUR JOB NOW FOR US WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS IS TO FIGURE THINGS OUT IN THIS INTELLECTUAL SUBSTITUTE REALITY AND TRANSPORT THE RESULTS OVER TO INFORM OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE BASED DYNAMICS. This can lead to dysfunction since we are using BINARY LOGIC in our SUBSTITUTE REALITY while our sense-experience reality is QUANTUM LOGIC based.
WE HAVE TO PRETEND, as in the THIN SKULL RULE, that the full and sole AUTHORING SOURCE is our MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT and further pretend that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and thus THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS THE WAVE-FIELD AND THAT AS OUR LANGUAGE INFORMS US, WE ARE LIVING IN A WORLD CONSTITUTED BY AN ABSOLUTE EMTPY SPACE POPULATED LOCALLY BY ABSOLUTE MATERIAL BEING THINGS NOTIONALLY WITH THEIR OWN GRAMMAR GIVEN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.
That is the DIFFERENTIATION based (BINARY LOGIC) WORLD of us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS.
The INTEGRATION based (QUANTUM LOGIC) WORLD of INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS AND MODERN PHYSICS starts from the relations, and while one may erroneously speak of “RELATIONS AMONG THINGS”, the realty is that the RELATIONS are supported by sense-experience while the THINGS are intellectual abstractions; i.e. we live in a world wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX so that capturing reality with DIFFERENTIATION will not do (since it DEPENDS on the existence of local explicit things) and we need instated to develop our understanding of reality by way of INTEGRATING relations without depending on the abstract notion of LOCAL, EXPLICIT material things.
6.54 My propositions are elucidatory in this way: he who understands me finally recognizes them as senseless, when he has climbed out through them, on them, over them. (He must so to speak throw away the ladder, after he has climbed up on it.)
He must surmount these propositions; then he sees the world rightly.
7.0 Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent. (“Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, darüber muss man schweigen”),
–Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
* * *
FOOTNOTE: RE: DIFFERENTIATING vis a vis INTEGRATING approaches to LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATIONS OF “REALITY”/
So, these are the finding from my philosophical investigations, and whereas I have previously tended to focus on WHAT IS WRONG with our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-STIMULATED THINKING, this summary has SHIFTED THE FOCUS FROM PROBLEMS WITH OUR LANGUAGE-BASED REALITY REPRESENTATIONS to PROBLEMS WITH OUR LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION SYSTEM WHICH IS MORE BASIC; i.e. there are problems in the architectural structure of our language based representation system in that it is a DIFFERENTIATION BASED LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION SCHEME and thus FRAGMENTATATIVE (and the source of DROP-OUT) whereas an INTEGRATION BASED LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION SCHEME IS INCLUSIVE (as in Indigenous aboriginal language architecture and Bohm’s Rheomode language architecture). Instead of using BINARY LOGIC based DIFFERENTIATION “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products” (which invokes the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LOCAL AUTHORING) which is FRAGMENTATIVE and thus the source of DROP-OUT of connective relations, we may use QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC INTEGRATION “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” which invokes the INCLUSIVE BOTH/AND relation where FIGURE (the TOWNING) and GROUND (the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) are ONE.
It is evident that the expression ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ is a simple ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY BINARY LOGIC DIFFERENTIATION based REPRESENTATION while the expression ‘there is TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’ is an ANDROGYNOUS (FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING —MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE) QUANTUM LOGIC INTEGRATION based REPRESENTATION.
The THIN-SKULL PRINCIPLE in WESTERN LAW exemplifies and underscores the WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM which OBLIGES US TO DUMB DOWN our LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATIONS to ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY REPRESENTATIONS. The mistaken impression of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ that this OBSCURANTISM supports now plays a foundational role in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based “REALITY” constructions. As Bohm points out, this is leading to both PHYSICAL and PSYCHOLOGICAL FRAGMENTATION in the WESTERN CULTURE social collective..
* * *