FORWARD:  We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have engineered a trickiness within our language which REDUCES RESONANCE FEATURES to BEING based OBJECTS, as with CLUSTERING which we reduce to ‘the CLUSTER’ and then we follow up with GRAMMAR to impute to the CLUSTER “ITS OWN AUTHORING POWERS” which ‘WALLPAPERS OVER” its real identity as a RESONANCE FEATURE that is NOT AN “IT” but is a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT relational feature and therefore DOES NOT HAVE “ITS OWN POWER” OF LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT.  The CLUSTER is nevertheless, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION, endowed by NAMING with BEING and EQUIPPED by GRAMMAR with its OWN notional POWERS OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.

This LANGUAGE-SUPPORTED BEING based FRAGMENTION OF REALITY used in the construction of a BEING-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY lets us enjoy the FALSE GLORY AND/OR SHAME of LOCAL AUTHORING, and removes us from our INNOCENCE of being included in the transforming relational continuum, without an encounter with snakes and partaking of forbidden fruit.

 

“They were upright and correct without knowing that to be so was righteous. They loved one another without knowing that to do so was benevolence. They were sincere without knowing that to do so was loyalty. They kept their promises without knowing that to do so was to be in good faith. They helped one another without thought of giving or receiving gifts. Thus their actions left no trace and we have no records of their affairs” – Chuang Tzu

 

Can we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS break the habit of giving our one-sided MALE ASSERTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY UNNATURAL PRECEDENCE over our ANDROGYNOUS sense-experience of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD?  Can we find the words to flip from ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ to ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’?

* * *

 

MODERN PHYSICS IS IN AGREEMENT WITH INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY BUT NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH WESTERN CULTURE… HERE’S WHY

 

PROFOUND DIFFERENCES IN UNDERSTANDING can come from basic assumptions, and that is the case in the EAST-WEST SPLIT in LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATION of “REALITY”

 

The word is not the thing and language based representation of reality are NOT REALITY but our language based conceptualizations of reality shape our individual and collective behaviours.

 

The difference between EAST and WEST can be illustrated by the difference between the VERB ‘CLUSTERING’ and the NOUN ‘CLUSTER’ (e.g. as in the case of ‘ants’ or in general).

 

WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have embraced a language architecture that SIMPLIFIES capture of CLUSTERING (a verb), … which is a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT dynamic, to ‘the CLUSTER’ which is a LOCAL and EXPLICIT THING-BASED dynamic.

 

CLUSTERING is NOT simply the work of the participants in “A CLUSTER”, CLUSTERING occurs within a relational complex as when a drop of honey from a bee-hive INDUCES the CLUSTERING of ants.  In this case, an understanding of CLUSTERING involves developments in the HABITAT involve the relations between the INHABITANTS and the HABITAT and one way of understanding this is in terms of TRANSFORMATION in which case we consider the INHABITANT-HABITAT system be ONE SYSTEM.

 

LANGUAGE makes an important difference to our thinking and understanding here because in those languages which give a foundational role to NAMES (NOUNS), one the NAME ‘CLUSTER’ in injected into the REPRESENTATION, we shift away from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT structure of CLUSTERING within the transforming landscape to LOCAL and EXPLICIT “CLUSTER” as if it exists IN ITS OWN BEING-BASED RIGHT, in which case we are forced to invent a GRAMMAR to describe WHAT WE SEE or rather to CONSTRUCT A SUBSTITUTE REALITY BASED ON LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEINGS aka ‘ANTS’ and in our mind’s eye as we pronounce such words as ‘THE CLUSTER IS GROWING LARGER AND IS SHIFTING TOWARDS THE WATER”S EDGE’.

In using this LANGUAGE CONSTRUCT we are employing what Nietzsche calls the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR and when we do this, we leave the “RELATIONAL REALITY” of, for example, indigenous aboriginal language groups and MODERN PHYSICS and we enter into a new SUBSTITUTE REALITY based MATERIAL BEINGS and THEIR ACTIONS such as THEIR GROWTH and THEIR MOVEMENTS, and in saying this, one can observe that we are inventing an IMPLIIED ABSOLUTE REFERENCE FRAME to support the notion of MOVEMENS that LOCALLY AUTHORED BY THE NAMING-instantiated THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES.

 

In other words, while the movements we are observing are part of the overall transforming relational continuum we share inclusion in, … LANGUAGE gives us the option of constructing REPRESENTATIONS of our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum (the all-including WAVFE-FIELD) and we have TWO POPULAR AND VERY DIFFERENT OPTIONS for the constructing of LANGUAGE-based REPRESENTATIONS which have been called THE EAST REALITY OPTION aka the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL REALITY OPTION which is FLOW-BASED and the MAINSTREAM (DOMINANT IN THE WORLD) WEST REALITY OPTION which is BEING BASED.

 

The ‘ant’ example of CLUSTERING (FLOW-BASED and thus NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) and CLUSTER (BEING-BASED) can help in exploring the different impact on our impressions of REALITY depending on which of these language groups we have ‘been born into’.

 

While the ‘CLUSTERING’ is something that occurs WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING LANDCAPE as when the drop of honey induces this movement and the participants in the CLUSTERING have NO INTENTION OF ‘FORMING A CLUSTER’, the CLUSTERING being OUTSIDE-INWARDLY INDUCED by events within the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

 

… the CLUSTER is something we abstractly conceive of as a LOCAL BEING with GRAMMAR given powers of LOCAL AUTHORING OF actions and development so that in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE we construct messages such as ‘the CLUSTER IS GROWING LARGER’ or ‘the CLUSTER IS SHIFTING TOWARDS THE WATER’, implying (A) the CLUSTERING is no longer a whorl in the flow of the including landscape but is NOTIONALLY a LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF, and (B) instead of the CLUSTERING being a relational phenomenon within the transforming landscape, WE USE GRAMMAR TO NOTIONALLY GIVE IT, … i.e. “IT” is now an “IT” (a THING-IN-ITSELF) thanks to the FIRST ERROR of ‘NAMING”, …  “A MIND OF “ITS” OWN, which is understood to be DIRECTING “ITS” ACTONS and DEVELOPMENT, and having used language to LIBERATE the CLUSTERING from its innate inclusion in the transforming landscape, implicitly re-situate it within a NOTIONAL EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT; i.e. the sort of space we need to be consistent with our NAMING and GRAMMAR invents that impute to the newly created BEING or INDEPENDENTLY-EXISTING THING-IN-ITSELF, ITS OWN LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS.  The EMPTY SPACE CONTAINER is NEEDED for CONCEPTUAL CONSISTENCY with our having imputed INDEPENDENT BEING and LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT to the INDEPENDENT BEING.   In other words, in order to create the existence of a LOCAL INDEPENDENT BEING, notionally with its own powers of AUTHORING actions and developments, we must also invent an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE CONTAINER for the NOW-FULL-INTERNALLY DRIVEN ‘CLUSTER’ to MOVE ABOUT IN.

 

AT THIS POINT, IT’S IMPORTANT TO REFLECT ON WHAT WE’RE DOING WITH OUR LANGUAGE CRAFTING.

 

WE ARE ABOUT TO RE-RENDER IN LANGUAGE, OUR PERCEPTION OF “CLUSTERING” AS IT OCCURS WITHIN A NATURAL ENVIRONMENT WITH ALL THE INFLUENCES THAT COME WITH THAT SUCH AS THE INDUCTIVE PULL OF THE HONEY WHICH EXPLAINS THE CLUSTERING.

 

POINT OF NOTE: THE CLUSTERING IS “INDUCED” WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE BY THE ATTRACTION OF THE HONEY.  THERE IS NO “ANT CLUSTER-THING-IN-ITSELF with “ITS OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS SUCH AS CLUSTERING” THAT EXPLAINS WHAT IS GOING ON HERE WITHOUT ACKNOWLEDGING THE INDUCTIVE INFLUENCE OF THE ENVIRONMENAL DYNAMIC.

 

THAT BEING SAID, OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE EMPLOYS THE DOUBLE ERROR COMBINATION OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR TO NOTIONALLY ANIMATE THE ACTIONS OF NAMING-INSTANTIATED THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES with NOTIONAL GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS OF AUTHORING THEIR OWN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.

 

THE POINT IS THAT “THERE IS NO CLUSTER WITH A MIND OF ITS OWN THAT AUTHORS THE ACTION OF CLUSTERING”.  ‘CLUSTERING’ ONLY “APPEARS” TO BE A LOCAL AND EXPLICIT INSIDE-OUTWARD MALE ASSERTING ORGANIZING PHENOMENON.  “CLUSTERING” IS INNATELY NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT and IS A FEMALE OUTSIDE-INWARD INDUCED ORGANIZING PHENOMENON.

 

For comparison, we have;

 

A: the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE ‘GEOMETRY’; ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ where the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE IS THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING that supports the secondary MALE ASSERTING ‘TOWNING’.  This can be compared with;

 

B: The WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTION: ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services’, … where the MALE ASSERTING ‘STANDS ON ITS OWN’ and THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING IS REPLACED BY ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE

 

The B approach is a troublesome feature in a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE because, while it has the advantage of SIMPLIFYING REALITY (i.e. introduction a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY WHICH IS ONE-SIDEDLY MALE-ASSERTING, it is THROWING OUT the PRIMARY ASPECT OF WAVE-FIELD REALIY WHICH IS THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD ASPECT WITHIN WHICH THE CONDENSATIONS are secondary MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATES.

 

The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS GROUNDED IN THE SECONDARY MALE-ASSERTING CONDENSATIONS (e.g. ‘the TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING) while the MODERN PHYSICS and INDIGENOUS ABORINGINAL LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is GROUNDED in the PRIMARY FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD PROPER (e.g. ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”).

 

CLUSTERING and TOWNING bring forth the same set of options for LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATION, the FIRST OPTION which is the OPTION that accords with MODERN PHYSICS is where CLUSTERING is understood as a phenomenon WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE in which case THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A “CLUSTER” THAT IS GROWING or SHRINKING.  THERE SIMPLY IS NO LOCAL EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF in the natural RELATIONAL RESONANCE PHENOMENON OF ‘CLUSTERING’, and THUS IT IS in the indigenous aboriginal language as also in ZEN where LANGUAGE CAPTURES THE FLUID CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD NATURE OF REALITY.

 

ONCE WE USE LANGUAGE TO GROUND THE REPRESENTATION IN LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING, SUCH AS ‘THE TOWN’ or ‘THE CLUSTER’, and use GRAMMAR to impute POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING to the newly invented NAMING-INSTANTIATED ‘LOCAL BEING’, … TOTO, I’VE A FEELING WE’RE NOT INKANSAS ANYMORE’.  That is, we are using language to invent and construct a REPRESENTATION OF A SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is SIMPLIFIED by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE WHICH IS PRIMARY and EMPLOYING the SECONDARY MALE-ASSERTING CONJGUATE AS IF IT WERE ALL SHE WROTE, since we SUBSTITUTE EMPTY SPACE for the PIMARY REALITY which is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

 

* * *

 

PICTURE THE CLUSTERING OF ANTS AS THEY ARE INDUCED INTO GATHERING AND SCATTERING BY A DROP OF HONEY, … which GATHERS THEM IN TO LOAD UP after which their SCATTER back to their homes to feed the hungry.

 

IF WE WATCH THE ANTS ACTIVITY, we can see THE ENVELOPE TO THE GATHERING-SCATTERING and we can THINK OF THIS as ‘A CLUSTER’ that is GROWING AND SHRINKING with the activity and our NAMING and GRAMMAR (DOUBLE ERROR BASED) WESTERN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE facilitates our LANGUAGE CAPTURE of what is going on terms of the ENVELOPE to GATHERING-SCATTERING CUSTERING, so that we can shift or language-based description to the ENVELOPE to which we attach the NAME ‘CLUSTER’ whereupon we can embellish this new NAMING based foundation with GRAMMAR to speak of this IMAGINARY ENVELOPE of the CLUSTER in terms of “IT” GROWING and SHRINKING..

 

AS with our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE TREATMENT of the CLUSTERING OF ANTS, so also with our  WESTERN LANGUAGE CULTURE TREATMENT of the TOWNING of HUMANS.  INSTEAD OF UNDERSTANDING CLUSTERING AND TOWNING AS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT RESONANCE FEATURES WITHIN A RELATIONAL DYNAMIC, we can ARCHITECT OUR LANGUAGE to orient to the STANDING WAVE PATTERNS, endowing them with BEING imputing NAMES which serve as STAKE-IN-THE-GROUND for further descriptions in terms of THEIR GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT.

 

NOW WE HAVE RE-GROUNDED OUR ‘REALITY’ IN LOCAL BEINGS, GIVING THEM GRAMMAR-BASED LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.  THE CLUSTERING or resonance feature thus become RECAST with LANGUAGE (NAMING) as a LOCAL BEING and GRAMAR is used to notionally EQUIP this BEING with notional POWERS OF AUTHORING GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, supporting the CONSTRUCTION OF A BEING-AND GRAMMAR BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which we are now using as our WESTERN CULTURE ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’.

 

NOT SO, OUR INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, TAOIST/BUDDHIST and ADVAITA VEDANTA brothers and sisters who are retaining a language architecture WHICH DOES NO RE-GROUND ITSELF BY REDUCING RELATIONAL DYNAMICS to BEING-based DYNAMICS.  In the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE, as ALSO IN MODERN PHYSICS, there is no SHIFT IN THE LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION SCHEME to RE-GROUND the REALTIONAL FORMS IN LOCAL MATERIAL BEING.  The CLUSTERING remains a relational form within the transforming relational continuum and the TOWNING remains a relational form in the transforming relational continuum, preserving the QUANTUM LOGIC FIGURE and GROUND as ONE sense as with a CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD.

 

DIFFERENCES IN SOCIAL DYNAMICS ASSOCIATED WITH THE WESTERN and EASTERN LANGUAGE BASED REALITY.

 

Those ANTS included in CLUSTERING have no reason to start thinking that THEY ARE THE LOCAL AUTHORS OF THE CLUSTER as derives from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR of a certain portion of the HUMANINGS in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, that portion has adopted a language-based representations scheme based on the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which imputes, within the language-based reality representation scheme, the concept of LOCAL AUTHORING.

 

Those who employ the WESTERN CUTURE language architecture, since it incorporates the abstraction of LOCAL AUTHORING have an exposure to EGO INFLATION sine the SUBSTITUTE REALITY constructed with this language serves up the concepts of INDIVIDUAL PRIDE and INDIVIDUAL SHAME due to language-supported notion of LOCAL AUTHORING POWER attributable to NAMED ENTITITIES with the help of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR; i.e. in the example of CLUSTERING, the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE AND GRAMMAR supports constructions such as THE CLUSTER IS GROWING LARGER where we are LEAVING BEHIND THE UNDERSTANDING OF ‘CLUSTERING’ AS RESONANCE FEATURE WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, having used the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to ‘POP OUT’ the CLUSTER as a LOCAL INDEPENDENT THING-IN-ITSELF notionally with its own GRAMMAR-given POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.

 

The CLUSTERING or the TOWNING, now becomes in language based representations talked about and thought about as ‘the CLUSTER’ and ‘the TOWN’, NOTIONALLY RECAST IN THE ABSTRACT TERMS OF local things-in-themselves with their own POWERS of AUTHORING actions and developments, AS IF WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.

 

GONE is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE in which these MALE ASSERTING AGENTS LIVE and FROM WHICH THE DERIVE THEIR VERY EXISTENCE AND WHAT IS IMPUTED TO BE ‘THEIR POWERS”.  The RAGING RIVER is now being accredited with the AUTHORING of the carving out of the CANYON whereas, if truth be told, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING VALLEY is the AUTHOR OF THE MALE ASSERTING RAGING RIVER.

 

In WAVE-FIELD reality, the ANDROGYNOUS structure opens up for us ALTERNATIVE ways of explaining unfolding actions and developments; i.e. the MALE-ASSERING option and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING option.  As Lao Tzu suggests;

 

Know the male but keep to the female’  … become the ravine of the world.  Being the ravine of the world, he dwells in constant virtue. 

 

The question of where and wen to be asserting and where and when to be accommodating is a distinguishing characteristic of DIFFERING CULTURES.

 

IF WE PUT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING FIRST AS LAO TZU RECOMMENDS, this serves as a kind of CONTAINING VESSEL for our MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS, .. but if put those MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS  FIRST, as WESTERN CULTURE IS DOING (its built into the language), EVERYONE IS HEADING OFF IN DIFFERENT MALE ASSERTING DIRECTIONS, “FRAGMENTING” THE SOCIAL DYNAMIC, .. DECLARING INDEPENDENCE which doesn’t exist and SUBSOPTIZING ONE’s NOTIONALLY INDEPENDENT SELF, NATION and CORPORATION, ignoring the UNREALITY of the abstract notion of INDEPENDENT BEING.

 

“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionistic scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

 

BECAUSE WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE OPTED FOR A LANGUAGE ARCHIECTURE THAT IS BEING-BASED where EVERYTHING WE NAME, we can CONFLATE WITH GRAMMAR to impute DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LOCAL AUTHORING,… THIS ABSTRACTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING SETS THE WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE ON A FRAGMENTATIVE ROAD TO HELL,

 

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

 The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc

 

 

SUMMARY: DOES CLUSTERING PRODUCE CLUSTERS?

 

WE know that there is the CLUSTERING OF ANTS as they gather around the honey-pot and scatter with their bounty to share it with their families, and within this GATHERING-SCATTERING RESONANCE DYNAMIC, we outside observers see what we call “A CLUSTER’, a local, explicit thing-in-itself that appears to GROW and SHRINK over time as ants continue to gather and scatter, as INDUCED by the honey pot.  This raises questions on how to capture this with language.  We can say thee is CLUSTERING which is INDUCED by the honey drop, BUT IS THERE A CLUSTER?  The cluster is a kind of WAVE-ENVELOPE to the gathering-scattering WAVE-ACTION where waves of ants keep arriving at the honey drop and departing.  We could snap a photo of the ant cluster or even a series of photos and prove by measurements that the CLUSTER was GROWING and SHRINKING over time, making it sound as THERE IS SUCH A THING AS “CLUSTER” but even though we have photographic EVIDENCE of a CLUSTER that is undergoing GROWTH and SHRINKING, the notion of a LOCAL THING; i.e. the CLUSTER is only APPEARANCE and once we start to use GRAMMAR to notionally ANIMATE the NAMING-instantiated LOCAL CLUSTER THING, we are on our way to the construction of a SUBSTITE REALITY which is THING-BASED (CLUSTER BASED) where we are attributing AUTHORING POWER to WHAT IS ONLY ‘APPEARANCES” or “SCHAUMKOMMEN”,… moving the motive energy from the transforming relational continuum to the INTERIOR of LOCAL EXPLICIT THINGS THAT ARE CREATING WITH THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR.

 

Let’s be honest.  WHAT IS THERE is the GATHERING-SCATTERING RESONANCE FEATURE of CLUSTERING.  THERE IS NO ‘CLUSTER’ WITH ITS OWN POWERS OF GROWTING LARGER OR SHRINKING OF SHIFTING ITS POSITION.  THERE IS NO CLUSTER!

 

A SUBSTITUTE REALITY is what we are constructing once we impute BEING to the CLUSTER and endow it with ITS OWN GRAMMAR BASED POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.

 

THIS USE OF LANGUAGE TO CONCOCT DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based SUBSTITUTE REALITIES IS A WESTERN CULTURE CHRONIC HABIT.  WHILE WE BUSY OURSELVES SORTING THINGS OUT WITHIN THIS SYNTHETIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY BASED ON ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, WE ARE TURNING OUR BACKS AND CLOSING OUR EYES TO THE REAL REALITY OF THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM THAT WE SHARE INCLUSION IN.

 

THE WAR BETWEEN RUSSIA and the UKRAINE is what is occurring in the SUBSTITUTE REALITY while what is really going on is the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION of the WAVE-FIELD.  DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE ARE NOT DEALING WITH REALITY.  THE REALITY THAT WE ARE LIVING IN A WAVE-FIELD WORLD, i.e. in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence

 

“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionistic scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

 

* * *