A SIMPLE SUMMARY OF THE BASIC MESSAGE IN MY SHARED NOTES

This summary will kick off from WHAT IS CURRENTLY CONCERNING the WORLD, at least those of us who watch the television news and discuss over the dinner table and in the coffee shops TRUMP’S latest capers.

The SIMPLE FACT is that we, the people, have developed a variety of ways of ORGANIZING OUR THOUGHTS and thus OUR ACTIONS, and what we see going on with TRUMP is a “REGRESSION” to a popular approach which largely DEFINES CONSERVATIVES which is where ‘a group of people’ opt for an ABSOLUTE TOP-DOWN ORGANIZING SCHEME giving OVERALL DIRECTION TO ONE LEADER who is given the power to MAKE THE ELEPHANT DANCE (hopefully NOT in the same manner as the CHARGE OF THE LIGHT BRIGADE).   THIS FORM OF POWER is characteristic of CONSERVATIVE thinking, and it CONTRASTS with LIBERAL thinking in THIS RESPECT;  Liberal thinking acknowledges that there is BOTH a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING aspect to ORGANIZATION and as well, a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING aspect, hence Lao Tzu’s “KNOW THE MALE YET KEEP TO THE FEMALE”

For example, the LIBERAL is the SOFTIE that DOES NOT GIVE ONE-SIDED READ-MY-LIPS STRICT TOP-DOWN ORDERS as CONSERVATIVES DO; i.e. the CONSERVATIVES SUPPORT THE ONE-SIDED TOP-DOWN AUTHORITY which simply DROPS OUT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of the EVER-PRESENT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ANABLING CONJUGATE, a DROP-OUT that has been BUILT IN TO WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  For example,  if we PUNCH another person and their SKULL FRACTURES, that FRACTURING could be coming from (A) the FORCE OF OUR PUNCH and/or (B) the EGG-SHELL FRAGILITY of the SKULL and this ANDROGYNOUS ambiguity is ALWAYS PRESENT but our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME “DROPS OUT” ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate so that in WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE, if a person punches another person and their SKULL FRACTURES, … BECAUSE IT IS AN EGG-SHELL THIN SKULL READY TO FRACTURE WITH THE SLIGHTEST OF BLOWS.

NOW, HERE’S WHERE GOEDEL’S THEOREM COMES INTO PLAY; i.e. THE THEOREM OF THE INCOMPLETENESS OF ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS.    WHEN WE SAY THE PUNCH SHATTERED THE RECIPIENT’S SKULL, this is TRUE but INCOMPLETE.  It is INCOMPLETE because it fails to CAPTURE the FULL REALITY wherein the EGG-SHELL THIN STATUS OF THE SKULL contributed to the SHATTERING of the SKULL so it was NOT JUST THE PUNCH that was RESPONSIBLE for the SHATTERING OF THE SKULL but ALSO, AT THE SAME TIME, the ‘GIVE’ (female accommodating/enabling) OF THE EGGSHELL-THIN SKULL.

THERE IS THUS A PROBLEM WITH WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING because “WE ARE DROPPING OUT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ROLE that is part of EVERY INTERACTION.  In other words, ALTHOUGH WE ATTRIBUTE DAMAGE to a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PUNCH, THERE IS ALWAYS A CO-CONTRIBUTION COMING FROM THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE.  RECALL THE PRIZE-FIGHT which was FIXED in that the BOXER FAVOURED TO WIN was evidently knocked out BY A PUNCH FROM HIS LESS CAPABLE OPPONENT, … OR DID HE ‘TAKE A DIVE’?   How would we know because what’s involved here is the ANDROGYNOUS phenomenon wherein the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING are FLIP SIDES OF A SINGLE CONJUGATE DYNAMIC wherein the TWO SEPARATE COMPONENTS WE SPEAK OF; i.e. the “EFFECTOR” and the “RECEPTOR” ARE NOT “SEPARATE” as in a BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM relation, but are ONLY ONE thing within a CONJUGATE NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM STRUCTURE; i.e. the INCLUDING MEDIUM is the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM and the EFFECTOR-RECEPTOR relationship is NON-BINARY and is that type of relationship that Lev Vygotsky describes, that confuses many WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, such as Jean Piaget (child psychologist) and thus confuses at the same time, his many readers.

“Though fundamentally different in nature, the development of scientific [local and explicit] and spontaneous [nonlocal and implicit] concepts represents two sides of the same concept formation”   implying a WAVE-BASED STRUCTURE.

“Our disagreement with Piaget centers on one point only, but an important point. He assumes that development and instruction are entirely separate, incommensurate processes, that the function of instruction is merely to introduce adult ways of thinking, which conflict with the child’s own and eventually supplant them. Such a supposition stems from the old psychological tradition of separating the structural from the functional aspects of development.” –Vygotsky

* * * * *

OK, I DID ENTITLE THIS NOTE “A SIMPLE SUMMARY OF THE MESSAGE IN THESE NOTES.” and I would describe Vygotsky’s pointing out of Piaget’s MISTAKE as basically pointing out a SIMPLE MISTAKE that WE WESTERN CULTURE FOLKS are MAKING EVERY DAY because WE HAVE BUILT IT INTO OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, which is sometimes given the tag ‘DEA ABSCONDITA (Goddess in Hiding) because INSTEAD OF OVERTLY ACKNOWLEDGING THAT “MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING” and “FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING” are “CONCEPTS THAT REPRESENT TWO SIDES OF THE SAME CONCEPT FORMATION”,  we are NOT ONLY SPEAKING of EACH OF THEM as if that MAKES SENSE, but we are actually DROPPING OUT ONE OF THEM (THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING) and EMPLOYING THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “AS IF” ON ITS OWN, and I put the SCARE QUOTES around “AS IF” because it MAKES NO SENSE TO SPLIT INTO TWO SEPARATE PARTS AN ANDROGYNOUS CONJUGATE RELATION.  THE PEAK-AND-TROUGH CONJUGATE of a WAVE cannot be REALISTICALLY be broken down into a PEAK which is the male assertive actualizing AGENT … AND … a TROUGH which is the female accommodating/enabling AGENT.  THERE ARE NOT TWO SEPARATE THINGS HERE, THERE IS ONLY THE ONE ANDROGYNOUS THING that, in Vygotsky’s words,  represents two sides of the same concept formation”

NOTA BENE:  WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, not only just in Piaget’s writing, but in general, is commonly (A) using BINARY LOGIC to split apart the two sides of the same concept formation

into BOTH “MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING” … AND… “FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING” … but NOW THAT WE HAVE CREATED TWO SEPARATE THINGS, AKIN TO A MALE “PEAK” and a FEMALE “TROUGH”, we continue to compound our error of NAMING-INSTANTIATED BEING, with the second error of GRAMMAR INSTANTIATED POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of our just-created FRAGMENT, … and we compound it by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, leaving us with MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PEAKS ON THEIR OWN; i.e. MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENCY ON ITS OWN which means AS IF IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

ACHTUNG!  NOTA BENE!   WE NOW HAVE A NEW OPERATOR  (NOTIONALLY) which is a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENT, now LIBERATED from its Siamese Twin binding with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, so that the LIBERATED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENT CAN NOW BE FOUND IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

So, now we have a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME wherein it is legitimate to speak in ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING TERMS such as “The PUNCH shattered the recipient’s SKULL” (WAIT A MINUTE, how much of this SKULL SHATTERING was due to the accommodating weakness of the SKULL?).  This IMAGERY of INDEPENDENT PEOPLE IN A PUNCHING MATCH is a LONG WAY from the imagery of hordes of people in a crowded piazza which are like CONDENSATIONS in an all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in that they are INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT, where POGO might say; “WE HAVE MET THE ENEMY AND HE IS US!”

GUESS WHAT!  WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING HAS GENERALIZED THE DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE AND GOING WITH ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENCY.

BUT WHAT DID WE JUST FINISH SAYING?  WE SAID THAT THERE ARE NOT TWO SEPARATE THINGS HERE, THERE IS ONLY THE ONE ANDROGYNOUS THING that, in Vygotsky’s words,  represents two sides of the same concept formation”

THIS IS CONFUSING US BECAUSE WE HAVE BUILT THIS DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE INTO OUR WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, BUT AS WE HAVE JUST REMINDED OURSELVES, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE, … OR MORE CORRECTLY, “IT MAKE NO SENSE” TO USE A LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that (A) MISTAKENLY PRESENTS A MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING COMPONENT AND A FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING COMPONENT AS TWO SEPARATE THINGS, and that (B) MISTAKENLY DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACOMMODATING/ENABLING COMPONENT AND EMPLOYS THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING COMPONENT “ON ITS OWN”.     NO! NO! NO!  IT DOES NOT EXIST ON ITS OWN, IT EXISTS ONLY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ANDROGYNOUS COMBINATION; i.e. as two sides of the same concept formation.

WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS (the DAMAGE DONE) by our POPULAR USE OF (A) and (B) in WESTERN CULTURE COMMON, EVERYDAY LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZINGS?

Because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate which informs us on the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and without which, our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS are constrained to the LOCAL AND EXPLICIT, this gives rise to FRAGMENTATION, as captured by Bohm as follows;

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.

* * * * * * *

THIS HAS BEEN “A SIMPLE SUMMARY OF THE MESSAGE IN THESE NOTES.”

I have seen a lot of this written about in far more elaborate ways, and I have myself written REAMS of more complicated explorations of these topics so, in that context, I can claim that this NOTE is  A SIMPLE SUMMARY of the messages in the long series of NOTES.

What this note BOILS DOWN TO is rather UNTHINKABLE for us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS because it supports this SCARY STATEMENT BY BOHM on FRAGMENTATION … and wholeness.

FACED WITH THIS MASSIVE SCREW-UP ON THE PART OF WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS that we have BUILT INTO AND CONTINUE TO BUILD INTO OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, WHERE DO WE GO AND WHAT DO WE DO?

SO FAR, NOWHERE AND NOTHING, because we continue to be DISTRACTED by SECOND ORDER ISSUES such as the POLARIZATIONS that we are hatching with our TOO SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based MISCONCEPTUALIZATIONS of QUOTE/UNQUOTE “REALITY” which we need NONBINARY LOGIC to get ourselves out of this BINARY LOGIC based FIASCO.

SHOULD I QUIT THIS NOTE WITHOUT SUGGESTING ANY REMEDIES?  I WOULD RATHER CLOSE WITH SOME RECOMMENDATIONS ON REMEDIES but what GETS IN MY WAY is our DUMBED DOWN LANGUAGE which is nowadays mostly BINARY LOGIC based and BINARY LOGIC IS THE PROBLEM!

ANYWAY, RATHER THAN CLOSING OUT AFTER RAISING ATTENTION TO A HUMONGOUS PROBLEM, WITHOUT OFFERING ANY SOLUTIONS, I WILL PULL OUT THE NONBINARY LANGUAGE, THAT IS NEEDED HERE, AND SAY THAT THE REMEDY FOR US WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS WHO ARE STUCK IN THE LA-LA LAND OF BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, IS TO SWITCH OFF THE BINARY LOGIC based THINKING and OPEN UP THE NONBINARY LOGIC based THINKING wherein we will be able to see that, for starters, RESTORATIVE JUSTICE is the right way to go.  It is NONBINARY LOGIC based and NONBINARY LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM, … which is where we accept views based on two sides of the same concept formation. and by this what is meant is what Vygotsky means which is that our REALITY is NOT BINARY LOGIC based as is the persisting popular thought, built into our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME where we CONSTRUCT representation based on MATERIAL FORMS in ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE which has us saying ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING THINGS such as ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’… FULL STOP.   This SAYS NOTHING ABOUT THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS AND THUS SAYS NOTHING ABOUT THE OVERALL ‘REAL REALITY’ of our INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

HEY!  OTHERS, such as indigenous aboriginals, DO HAVE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES SUPPORTIVE of such NON-BINARY LOGIC based relations, and out of those schemes comes different ways of understanding reality as exemplified by RESTORATIVE JUSTICE where, in order to understand it, we need the NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM which tells us that EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) and that we are all INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT as is understood in terms that WE and all material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including energy-charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD, and all this has been confirmed by MODERN PHYSICS but it HASN’T ‘TAKEN’ IN WESTERN CULTURE YET because we remain HUNG UP ON TOO SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS such as ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS without which there would be no GROWING OF THE TOWN.   But as Vygotsky was saying in his critique of Piaget, where we REALLY NEED TO GET TO LIES BEYOND OUR SIMPLE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE EXISTENCE OF BOTH THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING INFLUENCE and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING INFLUENCE to the point of understanding that these TWO CONCEPTS ARE TWO SIDES OF THE SAME (ANDROGYNOUS, WAVE-FIELD) CONCEPT FORMATION .

“Though fundamentally different in nature, the development of scientific [local and explicit as in the growing town] and spontaneous [nonlocal and implicit as in the shrinking wilderness] concepts represents two sides of the same concept formation”   which is TRANSFORMATION.

But the mistake we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are making is in thinking we can SPLIT APART the ANDROGYNOUS (WAVE-FIELD) COMBINATION (ERROR NUMBER ONE) and then KEEP THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PART AND DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING PART (ERROR NUMBER TWO).

THIS LEAVES US WITH OUR WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME THAT IS THE BASIS FOR OUR CONSTRUCTIONS OF REALITY, and WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE NOT ACKNOWLEDGED, AS INDIGENOUS ABORIGINARS HAVE, THAT EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, but have instead opted for ABSTRACTION consisting of LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEINGS, NOTIONALLY WITH POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING;.

Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

ADD TO THIS, DOUBLE ERROR BASED LOCAL AUTHORING CONSTRUCTS SUCH AS; “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING” and our WESTERN CULTURE conditioned mind may be in a state of celebration and NOT SEE what is IMPLIED as is what the indigenous aboriginals are ‘seeing’ which is the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, explicit acknowledgement of which has been DROPPED OUT of WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.

TIME TO CLOSE THIS NOTE ENTITLED; (“A SIMPLE SUMMARY OF THE BASIC MESSAGE IN MY SHARED NOTES “MY SHARED NOTES ” referring to the long multi-year series of notes).

I am hoping that the reader will have gathered from this particular NOT entitled “A SIMPLE SUMMARY OF THE BASIC MESSAGE IN MY SHARED NOTES.”

the understanding that WESTERN CULTURE is currently OFF THE RAILS in its understanding of REALITY as is affirmed by our sense-experience and as is affirmed by indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents in the context of the NONBINARY LOGIC based structure of our REALITY as explained through this SIMPLE SUMMARY.  In order to BRING TO MIND the RADICAL DIFFERENCES between WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of QUOTE/UNQUOTE “REALITY” and MODERN PHYSICS and INDIGENOUS ABORGINAL NONBINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of REALITY, one can think in terms of RESTORATIVE JUSTICE  (of indigenous aboriginal people) vis a vis PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE (of WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS) where, in the former, WE ARE ALL RELATED as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM whereby JUSTICE IS RESTORATIVE because THERE IS NO GETTING TO THE BOTTOM of an OUTBURST OF VIOLENCE where we are all STRANDS IN THE COMMON WEB; i.e. there is no LOCAL AUTHOR of VIOLENT EVENTS and the PERSON HOLDING THE SMOKING GUN is the STRAND IN THE WEB that is the CONDUIT for the VIOLENT VENTING of TENSIONS that build within the INTERCONNECTING and INTERDEPENDING WEB.

THE REMEDY FOR SUCH VIOLENCE is RESTORATIVE JUSTICE which employs NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM in finding ways to RESTORE and SUSTAIN RELATIONAL BALANCE AND HARMONY to resolve outbreaks of RELATIONAL IMBALANCE and DISSONANCE.  The VIOLENT STRAND IN THE WEB is understood NOT AS THE LOCAL AUTHOR but as the CONDUIT through which a build up of TENSIONS in the social-relational web are VIOLENTLY VENTED.

BY CONTRAST, WESTERN CULTURE PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE operates on the OUTDATED SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based BELIEF IN INDEPENDENT BEINGS that purportedly move about and interact in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.  When a STRAND IN THE WEB becomes VIOLENT in WESTERN CULTURE, he is MIS-IDENTIFIED as an INDEPENDENT BEING and thus accused of being the LOCAL AUTHOR of the VIOLENCE (which brings to mind the SCAPEGOATING OF THE IDENTIFIED PATIENT) and therefore PUNISHED by way of INCARCERATION or ELIMINATION, there being NO ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of his innate INCLUSION in an INTERCONNECTING and INTERDEPENDENT RELATIONAL WEB, due to the OVER-SIMPLIFYING that comes with SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC which is the common standard in WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS and has remained so for CENTURIES in spite of the new AWARENESS OF MODERN PHYSICS with its ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM that supports understanding in terms of global INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE.

WESTERN CULTURE PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE which presumes the existence of INDEPENDENT BEINGS with their own POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS is, as SYSTEMS SCIENCES show, LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS; i.e. a REWARDS AND PUNISHMENT SCHEME based on LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, a SCHEME which is NO LONGER SUPPORTABLE in the MODERN PHYSICS based REVISION of understanding wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (there are no ‘INDEPENDENT BEINGS’ that live within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE as has been the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION BASED FOUNDATIONAL UNDERSTANDING FOR WESTERN CULTURE PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE).

* * * * * * * * * * * *

THE BASIC MESSAGE IN MY SHARED NOTES is saying that WE ARE LIVING IN A WORLD where we can understand ourselves as STRANDS IN A WEB in which case OUR ACTIONS ARE INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT, so that, as in the THREE BODY PROBLEM of PHYSICS, the DYNAMICS of the WEB CANNOT BE REDUCED TO THE SUM OF THE DYNAMICS OF THE INDIVIDUAL STRANDS IN THE WEB.  The REALITY is that when THREE OR MORE PARTICIPANTS CO-CULTIVATE ACTION AS WITH STRANDS IN A WEB, SUCH ACTION IS MORE COMPLEX THAN CAN BE REDUCED TO THE SUM OF THE LOCAL AUTHORING CONTRIBUTIONS (as with WAVE-FIELDS, different contributions may tend to reinforce one another or may tend to cancel each other out).

IN the STRAND IN THE WEB SITUATION wherein THREE OR MORE INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT STRANDS ARE INVOLVED, WE CANNOT RESOLVE “WHICH STRAND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT”, SO THAT IF THERE IS VIOLENCE THAT VENTS THROUGH AN INDIVIDUAL STRAND, THE ORIGIN OF THE VIOLENCE IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT AND “THERE IS NO LOCAL AND EXPLICIT AUTHORING SOURCE” and the STRAND that is manifestly VIOLENTLY VENTING THE TENSIONS, WHILE SERVING AS THE CONDUIT FOR THE VIOLENT VENTING, IS NOT THE AUTHORING SOURCE OF THE VIOLENCE, BUT DUE TO THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR, THE STRAND THAT IS MERELY THE VENTING CHANNEL FOR THE VIOLENT RELEASE OF TENSIONS, IS MISIDENTIFIED AS THE LOCAL AUTHOR OF THE VIOLENCE.

THIS IS A CASE OF “THE SCAPE-GOATING OF THE IDENTIFIED PATIENT” as occurs in WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHOLOGY in a DYSFUNCTIONAL FAMILY where the ORIGIN OF THE TROUBLE IS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (RELATIONAL) AND HAS NO LOCAL AUTHORING SOURCE, BUT BECAUSE OF THE WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, which gives a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, there is a MISTAKEN INTERPRETATION OF THERE BEING A “LOCAL EXPLICIT AUTHOR” of the VIOLENCE when the REALITY is that the ORIGIN OF THE VIOLENCE is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (RELATIONAL), coming from the WEB (where the AUTHORING SOURCE IS LAUNDERED OUT by way of the THREE BODY PROBLEM) and merely VENTING THROUGH A LOCAL, EXPLICIT STRAND.  THIS MEANS THAT PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE (elimination of a purported LOCAL AUTHORING SOURCE) IS NOT VIABLE since THERE ARE NO LOCAL AUTHORING SOURCES (the SOURCING OF THE WEB IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT).  SINCE IT IS IMPOSSIBLE, IN THE STRAND-IN-THE-WEB DYNAMIC, TO IDENTIFY AND ELIMINATE A LOCAL, EXPLICIT SOURCE OF VIOLENCE, the REMEDY FOR VIOLENCE DOES NOT INVOLVE THE IDENTIFYING AND ELIMINATING OF A ‘LOCAL AUTHOR  OF VIOLENCE’ SINCE THE AUTHORING IS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, THE REMEDY IS INSTEAD THE CO-CULTIVATING OF RELATIONAL RESONANCE/HARMONY.  That is, the STRAND IN THE WEB that is the APPARENT AUTHOR OF THE VIOLENCE IS, in indigenous aboriginal culture, UNDERSTOOD TO BE NOT THE AUTHOR BUT THE CONDUIT STRAND IN THE WEB THAT IS VENTING TENSIONS ARISING IN THE WEB, in which case, in indigenous aboriginal culture, THERE IS NO SCAPE-GOATING OF THE INDENTIFIED PATIENT (since it is understood that the STRAND THAT IS VIOLENTLY VENTING TENSIONS IS NOT THE AUTHOR OF THE VIOLENCE), and the REMEDY is based on RESTORING BALANCE AND HARMONY IN THE INTERCONNECTING AND INTERDEPENDENT SYSTEM OF STRANDS IN THE WEB.

* * * * * * * * * * 

AUTHOR’S CLOSING COMMENT:

What is explained in the above essay is how INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL AND MODERN PHYSICS WORLDVIEW DIVIDES from WESTERN CULTURE WORLDVIEW which in turn explains how the CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL POLITICS of WESTERN CULTURE ARE BOTH MISGUIDED BY THEIR GIVING A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO THE ABSOLUTES of “BEING”, and “LOCAL AUTHORING”.

It can be seen that the THREE BODY PROBLEM is an ARTIFACT of the USE of TOO-SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC which DISAPPEARS once there is acknowledgement of the LESS SIMPLE NONBINARY LOGIC STRUCTURE wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka WAVE-FIELD).   The THREE BODY PROBLEM (the impossibility of calculating the exact trajectories of three or more bodies moving under one-another’s simultaneous mutual influence) is a reminder that EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX (mitakuye oyasin) including the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM within which MATERIAL FORMS are APPEARANCE (Schaumkommen).  Because there is ambiguity between material condensations and the energy-charged PLENUM they share inclusion in, we cannot use BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM when we are using LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to convey REALITY since the BINARY LOGIC options of EITHER MATTER OR EMPTY SPACE are TOO SIMPLE since we need to capture the LESS SIMPLE BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the material form is actually a DYNAMIC RELATIONAL FEATURE WITHIN THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM as with the WHORLING in the FLOWING which are NOT TWO SEPARATE THINGS but ANDROGYNOUS FEATURES WITHIN THE ONE “FLOWING” THING (the transforming relational continuum).

“Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”

And as with the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FLUID TRANSFORMING FLOW OF THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, no amount of LOCAL and EXPLICIT definition in terms of WHAT THINGS DO can capture the NONLOCAL and and IMPLICIT dynamics of TRANSFORMATION.

WESTERN CULTURE “SCAPE-GOATING OF THE IDENTIFIED PATIENT” is the result of the WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING HABIT of ESTABLISHING ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ WHERE THERE IS NO SUCH THING.  TRANSFORMATION IS FOUNDATIONAL AND IT IS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and this means that the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME must have this capability which means that LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONSTRUCTS ARE INSUFFICIENT and the SCAPE-GOATING of the IDENTIFIED PATIENT IS EXEMPLARY of PUSHING THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT BEYOND ITS LIMITED CAPABILITY IN AN ATTEMPT TO CONCEPTUALIZE THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  In the INTERCONNECTING AND INTERDEPENDENT STRAND IN THE WEB RELATION, EMERGENT DEVELOPMENTS ARE OF A NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT NATURE which is why INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL JUSTICE IS RESTORATIVE (SINCE VIOLENCE DERIVES FROM THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT [relational] RATHER THAN FROM LOCAL and EXPLICIT ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, the latter (which are APPEARANCE) opening the way to PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE (IDENTIFICATION AND ELIMINATION OF THE PURPORTED LOCAL AUTHOR OF VIOLENCE).

THERE ARE NO LOCAL AUTHORS IN MODERN PHYSICS NOR IN INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURES.  OUTBURSTS OF VIOLENCE OR DYSFUNCTION ARE OF A NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT ORIGIN, hence the need for RESTORATIVE rather than PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE.