Posts by ted lumley
The BIG LIE is a phenomenon which has been exploited by politicians. It is written about by Hitler in Mein Kampf. If the lie is small, the man on the street will call us out on it. But when the lie is huge, and coming with the backing of ‘authorities’, as we have seen recently with Donald Trump and the BIG LIE that ‘the election was fraudulent’ and that ‘Trump was really the winner’, many people will believe ‘the big lie’.
There are BIG LIES that divide the world, and the one that has caught my attention is the BIG LIE OF “BEING” of the WESTERN CULTURE that I have grown up in. How can BEING co-exist with a fluid world?
“In the writing of Heraclitus, to a larger degree than ever before, the images do not impose their burden of concreteness but are entirely subservient to the achievement of clarity and precision”
“Heraclitus had declared ‘being’ a perpetual ‘becoming’ and had correlated the two concepts with his ‘hidden attunement.’ Now Parmenides declared the two to be mutually exclusive, and only ‘being’ to be real.” — ‘The Intellectual Adventure of Ancient Man’, — ‘Henri Frankfort, H. A. Frankfort, John A. Wilson, Thorkild Jacobsen, and William A. Irwin.
The SOURCE of the BEING based world is DIFFERENTIATION as in the BINARY LOGIC SPLIT between the MATERIAL PARTICLE and EMPTY SPACE, and from THIS MOST ELEMENTAL BEING, a language architecture follows which is based on DIFFERENTIATION out the LOCAL and EXPLICIT where, in the end, everything can be understood in the context similar to that of the Russian doll, the Matryoshka, where the larger forms are built up from smaller forms so that in order to understand what might be termed the MACRO-REALITY, we can break it down into a parts-wise MICRO-REALITY. This BEING based worldview is a BINARY LOGIC worldview based on MALE ASSERTING ACTION of MATERIAL BEING-based STRUCTURES MOVING AND INTERACTING in EMPTY SPACE..
By contrast, the SOURCE of the BECOMING-based world is INTEGRATION rather than DIFFERENTIATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) as in the formation of clouds which are ACCUMULATIONS arising from the INTEGRATION of CONDENSATIONS of the energy-charged PLENUM they are included in. This INTEGRATION-BASED SHAPE-SHIFTING COMPRISED BY FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ACTION gives rise to FORMINGS WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING PLENUM. These FORMINGS within the TRANSFORMING as relate with QUANTUM LOGIC (the BOTH/AND logic of the including medium.
NOTA BENE! The language-based world of INTEGRATION where local forms are INCLUSIONS in the all-including energy-charge PLENUM so that ALL ARE RELATED, may be ambiguously captured in language by REDUCING their QUANTUM LOGIC FIGURE-INCLUDED-IN-GROUND relation with LANGUAGE that Re-presents them as “FORMS” within an EMPTY CONTAINING SPACE, creating a language-based SIMLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, a SUBSTITUTE REALITY that can be extended and adapted and maintained on the basis of the BINARY LOGIC architecture of MUTUALLY EXCLUDING material objects and empty space.
AUTHOR’S SUMMARY of; LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM in Western Culture Language Architecture
We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have ‘engineered’ the Common Average European language architecture to BREAK DOWN and SIMPLIFY our language capture of WAVE-FIELD REALITY by BREAKING OUT the MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE ON ITS OWN, and at the same time simply DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE so as to construct a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on ONE-SIDED, BINARY LOGIC based MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, as for example ‘the TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’ which implies BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR SPLITTING of the TOWN out of the LANDSCAPE and implying only MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS without any FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.
While this one-sided MALE ASSERTING is all that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are putting into our language based representations, our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is of inclusion in the ANDROGYNOUS (FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE-ASSERTING) WAVE-FIELD, setting up a CONFLICT between our LANGUAGE-INFORMED INTELLECT and our SENSE-EXPERIENCE INFORMED AWARENESS, and this is the source of rising FRAGMENTATION within our psyche and in our actions as WESTERN CULTURE ADHERING individuals and social collectives.
This LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE is “NOT” SUFFERED by indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents. These groups have acknowledged the natural fit of QUANTUM LOGIC with sense-experience reality and the over-simplicity of BINARY LOGIC. QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the including medium which captures the physical relational structure of reality wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED WAVE-FIELD PLENUM. WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is OBSCURANTIST in that it employs a language architecture that “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE of the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD. Since the FEMALE CONJUGATE is the INTEGRATING CONTAINER for MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, this OBSCURANTISM is leading to increasing FRAGMENTATION in BOTH the PSYCHE and SOCIAL DYNAMICS of WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS (as noted by Bohm).
This short essay describes the basics of this WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM wherein the all-including QUANTUM LOGIC (wherein material forms are condensations of the ) WAVE-FIELD FLOW is OBSCURED by LANGUAGE based SUBSTITUTION of notional INDEPENDENT MATERIAL FRAGMENTS notionally with ‘their own’ GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS and INTERACTIONS, as if situated within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE. This BINARY LOGIC OBSCURANTIST SUBSTITUTE REALITY is now our WESTERN CULTURE OPERATIVE REALITY which is leading to rising FRAGMENTATION in both WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHOLOGICAL and PHYSICAL REALMS.
* * *
LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM is a WESTERN CULTURE DYSFUNCTION coming from ERRORS in our “Common Average European” Language Architectures. The Nietzsche-labelled ‘DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’ which sets up a notional LOCAL AUTHOR’ gives us the sense of a one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY world dynamic.
The WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE of WAVE-FIELD REALITY, can be seen, for example, where we reduce the QUANTUM LOGIC “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, where TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is given as the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING receptacle for the MALE ASSERTING TOWNING, … to the BINARY LOGIC ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products which has DROPPED OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING LANDSCAPE and reduces the impression of the transforming landscape to the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING REPRESENTATION OF THE TOWN THAT IS GROWING, … as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE’.
This DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR construction is LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM and it is BUILT IN to WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and thus it is built in to our common :LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION, or better, “LINGUISTIC MIS-REPRESENTATION” of REALITY. To be clear, it is IMPOSSIBLE, in the spherical space of our sense-experience, for a TOWN to “GROW” without a SIMULTANEOUS SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS that the GROWING TOWN is ‘pushing into’. This CONJUGATE RELATION of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING with MALE ASSERTING is basic to the WAVE-FIELD world of our sense-experience and there are problems where we reduce this ANDROGYNOUS reality to a one-sided MALE-ASSERTING substitute reality..
Meanwhile, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is ‘infected’ by LINGUISTIC OBSCURATISM wherein there is a DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE so that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS end up constructing a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is ONE-SIDEDLY MALE-ASSERTING, as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE (Euclidean) SPACE.
LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION supports Purification which is BINARY (either/or) LOGIC based (e.g. the TOWN is GROWING), which is one-sided MALE ASSERTING as if in EMPTY SPACE.
LINGUISTIC INTEGRATION gives rise to Coherence which is QUANTUM (both/and) LOGIC based (e.g. there is TOWNING in the transforming landscape) which is …”BOTH” … FEMALE ACCOMMODATING (with respect to “an OPENING in the transforming landscape” that accommodates a filling in with TOWNING) … “AND” MALE ASSERTING (with respect to “the TOWNING”).
The understanding here is, instead of one’s language IMPOSING an INTELLECTUAL REPRESENTATION of REALITY, our language is instead CAPTURING a sensory IMPRESSION of REALITY so there is no need to DEBATE and use BINARY LOGIC to determine WHO HAS THE BEST IMPRESSION as with WHO HAS THE BEST REPRESENTATION, but to instead gather the IMPRESSIONS together in the LEARNING CIRCLE to use INTEGRATION to extract the coherencies from the confluence of relations of multiple IMPRESSIONS.
The point is that IMPRESSION is first of all about the psycho-sensual receptivity of the OBSERVER and how the OBSERVER is inductively influenced by his/her OBSERVING while REPRESENTATION is the OBSERVER’S INTELLECTUAL IMPOSING of ‘BEING’ based structure’. The “INTELLECTUAL IMPOSING of MATERIAL EVIDENCE” is exposed to DROP OUT as in the ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ where REPRESENTATION is limited to MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS as if occurring in an EMPTY SPACE. But in WAVE-FIELD reality, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate is important so that the COLLAPSING of the EGG-SHELL SKULL cannot be fully and solely attributed to MALE ASSERTING ACTION. Likewise, the farmer’s bumper crop cannot be fully and solely attributed to the farmer’s MALE ASSERTING ACTION simply because WESTERN CULTURE DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE (e.g. accommodating soil and weather) in its LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION.
The sense IMPRESSION, because it includes the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, while it is LESS SIMPLE than the MALE ASSERTING ACTION CONJUGATE on its own, is MORE COMPLETE and exposes the INCOMPLETENESS of ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATIONS of REALITY, an INCOMPLETENESS that we are WARNED ABOUT by Goedel’s Theorem (of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite logical propositions).
* * *
We have all heard of Heraclitus’ “EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX” and Modern Physics’ POPULAR FORMULATION supports this with its CONCEPTUALIZING of an ALL-INCUDING WAVE-FIELD, … but WAIT A MINUTE, … this notion that MATERIAL THINGS are CONSTANTLY TRANSFORMING and that we can use PROBABILITY to capture their transitioning from MATTER to ENERGY … WAS CONTESTED by Schroedinger and others on THE FOLLOWING BASIS;
WHICH IS IT? “FLUX IS EVERYTHING” or “EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX”?
Once we OPEN THE DOOR to EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, as the mainstream of MODERN PHYSICS has done (although NOT Schroedinger, Bohm and others in the PHILOSOPHICAL camp such as Wittgenstein and Nietzsche), we are giving a FOUNDATION ROLE to MATERIAL BEING and saying that there is such a thing as MATERIAL BEING but such MATERIAL BEINGS (particles or whatever) ARE IN CONSTANT FLUX. This is one of those self-contradictory propositions like ‘the PRARODOX OF THE ARROW’ of ZENO’ which shows the IMPOSSIBILITY of this simultaneous duality of stillness of LOCAL EXPLICIT BEING and FLUID MOVEMENT.
It MAKES MORE SENSE to go with ‘FLUX IS EVERYTHING’ than to go with ‘EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX’.
In other words, we need to accept that MATERIAL THINGS are ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ as Schroedinger consistently maintained to the day of his departure, in which case we have to DROP the ‘THINGS’ in ‘EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX’ and go with ‘FLUX IS EVERYTHING’.
What I am saying is that the WAVE-FIELD is PRIMARY and we have to let go of WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY. In other words, it is NOT in the REALM of PHYSICS that we can tie down this WAVE-MATTER DUALITY but in the REALM of LANGUAGE since FLUX IS EVERYTHING and there is no room for CONFUSED THINKING in terms that EVERY”THING” IS IN FLUX. The “THING” ABSTRACTION HAS TO GO as in “FLUX IS EVERYTHING” so that our understanding can be “grounded” in WAVE-FIELD FLUIDITY wherein MATERIAL THINGS are APPEARANCES (schaumkommen).
* * *
There is dysfunction built into WESTERN CULTURE social dynamics, which David Bohm describes as FRAGMENTATION. But where does this FRAGMENTATION ‘come from’?
A ‘first order’ answer to this question is that FRAGMENTATION comes from LANGUAGE, from our DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE so that our LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATIONS of Reality are in ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING TERMS while the FEMALE CONJUGATE, which is naturally deserving of PRIMARY STATUS, is “DROPPED OUT” by way of the SUBSTITUTING of ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE.
So, instead of WAVE-FIELD conjugate relation wherein FEMALE ACCOMMODATING induces conjugate MALE ASSERTING, we have, IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATIONS of ‘REALITY’, the ONE-SIDED, MECHANISTIC MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS ON THEIR OWN. This one-sided MALE ASSERTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY is the COMMON LANGUAGE-based ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’ in WESTERN CULTURE.
EXAMPLE: Where we have the CONIUNCTIO of FEMALE-ACOMMODATING and MALE-ASSERTING as in where ‘THERE IS TOWNING (male-asserting) IN THE (female-accommodating) TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ , our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC SIMPLIFICATION SERVES UP THE FOLLOWING ‘REDUCTION’ … The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products”.
This kind of language embodies DIFFERENTIATION, as it ‘differentiates out’ the ‘TOWN’, using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development (i.e. ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services’.
This DIFFERENTIATION based (BINARY LOGIC based) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is very familiar to ENGLISH LANGUAGE users and Common Average European language users, but the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL language users, and the Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta language users employ INTEGRATION based (QUANTUM LOGIC based) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE as exemplified by ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (or transforming relational continuum)’. In this case, we understand TOWNING as an INTEGRAL FEATURE WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE WHEREIN EVERYTHING IS IN CONTINUING FLUX.
NOTA BENE! There is a NATURAL PRECEDENCE in the use of INTEGRATION based language and DIFFERENTIATION based language in the PSYCHOLOGY of THOUGHT AND LANGUAGE as explained by Vygotsky in “THOUGHT and LANGUAGE”;. That is, as we take everything in that is going on around us in the particular situation we find ourselves in, our outside-inward thinking is in INTEGRATING mode, bringing everything into connective confluence to extract the coherencies, … but in our RESPONDING to our situation, our thinking is now DIFFERENTIATING as we develop different courses of action and make our selection.
In ‘Thought and Language’, Lev Vygotsky points out that ‘spontaneous concept formation’ induced by the situation we find ourselves in, and ‘scientific concept formation’ which we can think of as our corresponding intention driven response that is inductively actualized by the unfolding situation, are a single system; i.e. a situational-intentional nonduality. We might compare this with a Dionysian-Apollonian nonduality
PROBLEM!: PIAGET has had a strong influence on WESTERN CULTURE views on thought and learning which relate to the DIFFERENCE between the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL and WESTERN CULTURE understanding, where the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL comprehension puts INTEGRATION into natural precedence over DIFFERENTIATION whereas PIAGET (and we can look to his views as characterizing the prevailing WESTERN CULTURE views), ignores the NATURAL CONJUGATE RELATION between THOUGHT and LANGUAGE.
POSTSCRIPT TO: UNDERSTANDING How DIFFERENTIATION and INTEGRATION figure in WESTERN CULTURE “FRAGMENTATION”
IF WE START FROM THE LAST NOTE, … THE KEY PREMISE CAN BE FOUND IN THE DISCUSSION OF THE ‘THIN SKULL RULE’. EVEN THOUGH WE KNOW FULL WELL THAT THE MALE ASSERTING PUNCH IS INSUFFICIENT TO EXPLAIN THE COLLAPSING OF THE THIN SKULL, … since this ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ACTION IS INNATELY TOO SIMPLE and IN BASIC CONTRADICTION TO THE WAVE-FIELD understanding of reality THE FEMALE_ACCOMMODATING—MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE understanding aka the Yin/Yang understanding, … which is embraced not only by INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS BUT ALSO AFFIRMED BY MODERN PHYSICS.
I AM SIMPLY AFFIRMING, and HAVE SAID NOTHING HERE TO CONTRADICT, .. THE GREAT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ON THIS TOPIC AS AFFIRMED BY BUDDHISTS AND BY BOHM and NIETZSCHE and SCHROEDINGER and WITTGENSTEIN AND OTHERS, …
SO THE SCRUTINIZING OF THIS NOTE NEED NOT GO BACK TO REVIEWING THOSE QUANTUM LOGIC UNDERSTANDINGS, the SCRUTINY NEEDS TO GO TO WHY WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS CONTINUE TO EMPLOY BINARY LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE TO CONSTRUCT REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY WHEN WE KNOW THAT OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE REALITY CONFORMS WITH QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE.
WHY? THE ANSWER IS CLEAR. IN SYSTEMS TERMS, “WE ARE LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS”. DO WE WANT TO FACE UP TO THE “COST” IN “SOCIAL RE-ADJUSTMENT TERMS” IN OUR BINARY LOGIC INFUSED SOCIAL RELATIONAL COMMON PRACTICES, OF “UPGRADING” FROM “BINARY LOGIC” TO “QUANTUM LOGIC” AS IS CALLED FOR IN THE “UPGRADE” FROM “NEWTONIAN BINARY LOGIC BASED REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY WHICH ARE OF A MECHANISTIC (ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY ) “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”?
ANSWER: The SWITCHING COSTS ARE HUGE AND INCLUDE;
-1- REVAMPING THE WESTERN JUSTICE SYSTEM. MODERN PHYSICS CONFIRMS THAT THE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM ‘MAKES SENSE’ IN THAT IT IS BASED ON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT WE LIVE IN A RELATIONAL WORLD WHEREIN THERE IS NO SUCH THING, … AS THERE IS ASSUMED TO BE IN WESTERN JUSTICE, … AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” as is supported in WESTERN CULTURE GENERALLY and which is ABSTRACTION coming from the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE; i.e. from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which IMPUTES “LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments” and which is used to construct a LOCAL AUTHORING BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, while all the while, our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is informing us we share inclusion in a transforming relational continuum (aka the WAVE-FIELD) wherein the dynamics are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational). IN OTHER WORDS, “LOCAL AUTHORING” IS A SCAM! IT IS THE PRODUCT OF THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR.
This PARTICULAR ERROR, ‘the DOUBLE ERROR’, RADICALLY REVISES WESTERN CULTURE CONCEPTS OF JUSTICE, MEDICINE and COMMERCE, and thus the FOUNDATIONAL STRUCTURE OF WESTERN CULTURE ADMINISTRATION SYSTEMS, all of which are HEAVILY SHAPED by the influence of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which IMPUTES “LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments”
Why refer to WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS as a SLEEPWALKER CONFEDERACY?
The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is a language architecture designed to put the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE TO SLEEP, leaving only the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE ‘AWAKE’.
It is a SLEEPWALKER CONFEDERACY in the sense that millions of people have adopted a common language architecture wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE has been “PUT TO SLEEP” so that only the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE IS ‘AWAKE’.
This has been achieved with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is used to invent the ABSTRACT NOTION of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’.
In this BINARY LOGIC based Mode of REPRESENTATION wherein the FIRST ERROR is the NAMING that imputes BEING and the SECOND ERROR is the GRAMMAR that conflates the FIRST ERROR by bestowing LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS on the NAMING-instantiated BEING.
As we know from Modern physics and as has been the understanding of Indigenous Aboriginal cultures Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedant, we are included in an ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD REALITY and WAVE-FIELDS are constituted by FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE RELATIONS as where the ACCOMMODATING OPENING or SHRINKING of the VALLEY LANDSCAPE and the CONJUGATE ASSERTING ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENTS and PRODUCTION together are the agents of TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE.
In the SPHERICAL SPACE we live in, as with waves in the ocean, when a hole or depression opens up this ‘valley’ is balanced out the rising of a hill or mountain. THESE MOVEMENTS ONLY APPEAR TO BE TWO POLAR OPPOSITE ACTION, but in the land on the surface of a sphere, there can be NO subducting and opening of a hole or valley without a conjugate uplifting and protruding of a mound or mountain since this motion is relative.
A BRIEF PERSONAL COMMENT on … THE FALL FROM GRACE: in the light of QUANTUM LOGIC versus BINARY LOGIC0
HERE IS A BRIEF PERSONAL COMMENT ON MY CONTINUING RESEARCH:
What I am trying to share is something I normally try to back up with analysis and this increases the number of words I use.
Here’s the basic problem that make my messages lengthy. The problem that is screwing up our social dynamic is coming from our Common Average European language architecture so in order to share this, I have to (a) invent a more competent language, and (b) bring the people I am trying to share ideas with up to speed in the new, LESS SIMPLE language.
That is what my posts are all about, which makes them long and perhaps appearing as NOT TO THE POINT, and that is relevant because the needed shift for communications that attempt the bridge between the popular BINARY LOGIC based language constructions which we commonly use and the QUANTUM LOGIC based language constructions which the indigenous aboriginals commonly use and which are needed for Modern physics competent exchanges, is a shift out of any/all dependency on BEING-based or BINARY LOGIC based concepts, to communications that are purely relationally based. This can be illustrated with examples which compare the BINARY LOGIC representation ‘the Town is growing’… with the QUANTUM LOGIC representation ‘There is Towning in the transforming landscape’.
We can see that in the expression ‘there is Towning in the transforming landscape’, everything is relational (nonlocal and implicit) and there is nothing in the statement that is LOCAL and EXPLICIT because the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, is like the WHORLING in the FLOWING wherein FIGURE and GROUND are one. That is the very definition of QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING MEDIUM; i.e. the MEDIUM AS A FLUID CONTAINER in which the CONTENTS are made of the CONTAINER as with whorling in the flowing. That is what QUANTUM LOGIC is all about and QUANTUM LOGIC comes from Modern physics’ capture of the structure of the world; i.e. we live in a world where we can distinguish between MATERIAL forms (which are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD) and the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD (the PLENUM); i.e. the WAVE-FIELD with its locally pinched up CONDENSATIONS aka MATERIAL FORMS and these CONDENSATIONS are like WHORLINGS IN THE FLOWING; i.e. the WHORLING FIGURE and FLOWING GROUND are ONE.
We live in a WAVE-FIELD world wherein we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have devised a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that DUMBS DOWN our REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY to ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS. This IS A SIMPLIFIED “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” that supports coordinating the actions of its user base, by way of their common orienting to the SUBSTITUTE REALITY. It is possible to coordinate actions on the basis of the TOWN that one is CONSTRUCTING (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS) or on the basis of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE that one is included in (INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS). Note that the FORMER COORDINATION APPROACH rides roughshod over the LATTER COORDINATION APPROACH.
A FURTHER ISSUE is that this WESTERN CULTURE SIMPLIFIED, LANGUAGE BASED SUBSITITUTE REALITY REPRESENTATION “OBSCURES” rather than simply OMITS the LESS-SIMPLE aspects of our sense-experience reality, such as the QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD so that FIGURE (CONDENSATION) and GROUND (WAVE-FIELD) “ARE ONE”, rather than “TWO” as in our “STANDARD” WESTERN CULTURE SUBSTITUTE REALITY REPRESENTATION. SO, every time we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR construct with its LOCAL AUTHOR CONNOTATION, we are WRONG and furthermore, we are in the process FRAGMENTING REALITY by creating more LOCAL AUTHOR FRAGMENTS, who are in our REPRESENTATION SCHEME “NOT RELATED” because they are insulated from one another by the ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE we are notionally putting them into and giving them a BINARY LOGIC based INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE STATUS (EITHER I exist OR I don’t exist) which is too simple to support our QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of an ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD in which MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS.
The WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM is put into play with BINARY LOGIC which is TOO SIMPLE to deal with QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC there the MATERIAL FIGURE is a CONDENSATION of the ALL-INCLUDING (WAVE-FIELD) GROUND. What we are seeing with the movement of figures is actually the TRANSFORMATION of the WAVE-FIELD, pointing to the relevancy of QUANTUM LOGIC discourse wherein the FIGURE is a CONDENSATION OF THE WAVE-FIELD GROUND.
The insistence on a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE supporting the EXISTENCE of INDEPENDENT MATERIAL FORMS (such as we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS claim for ourselves) signals widespread deception by way of LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM that supports WAVE-FIELD DENIAL. This is RAMPANT in WESTERN CULTURE wherein we have elevated the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGUATE of the WAVE-FIELD INTO THE LEAD POSITION NATURALLY OCCUPIED BY THE UNDIVIDED WAVE-FIELD.
The RESULT IS WAVE-FIELD DENIAL, secured by LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM in which we PROMOTE A SUBSTITUTE REALITY OF MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT ENSCONCED IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.
* * * * * *
We live in a WAVE-FIELD WORLD that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is OBSCURING.
The SUBSTITUTING OF BINARY LOGIC FOR QUANTUM LOGIC IS THE METHOD BY WHICH OBSCURTISM IS SECURED.
The Thin-Skull Rule is just one example that exposes a general pattern of OBSCURANTISM wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE is DROPPED OUT of WESTERN CULTURE language based representation.
The Thin Skull Rule reduces the reality of our inclusion in an all-including WAVE-FIELD dynamic by SUBSTITUTING the abstract notion of an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the all-including WAVE-FIELD. This DROP-OUT is LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM that FALSELY elevates the MALE-ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE to an overall SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTING STATUS. When we say that ‘the FORCE OF THE PUNCH SHATTERED THE RECIPIENT’S SKULL, we make no mention of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, the innate presence of which is basic to the REALITY of our inclusion in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, as is captured in indigenous aboriginal languages and as is acknowledged in Modern physics.
INTRODUCTION: The ‘FALL FROM GRACE’ NEVER HAPPENED FOR the Indigenous aboriginals because they never made the DROP-DOWN shift from QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC as WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have done. DROP-DOWN comes with the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE of the WAVE-FIELD which leaves only the MALE ASSERTING AGENCY as has been made the FOUNDATION of WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European LANGUAGES. This is equivalent to LIMITING AUTHORING to the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE ONLY which now has only the BINARY LOGIC options of EITHER ‘up’ OR ‘down’ but without the BOTH ‘in’ AND ‘out’ of QUANTUM LOGIC.
Does the HURRICANE stir up the ATMOSPHERE (male asserting) or does the ATMOSPHERE stir up the HURRICANE (female induction)? NEITHER of these two BINARY LOGIC representations explains what is going on here. SOLAR IRRADIANCE is a WAVE-FIELD (androgynous) that is QUANTUM LOGIC based and explains both of the flat-space polar opposite dynamics.
BINARY LOGIC lets us speak in terms of the INCREASE or DECREASE of the one-sided MALE ASSERTING dynamics of ACTION, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION but is MISSING the inner-outer dimension of ACCOMMODATING or DISACCOMMODATING. Thus we can speak in MALE ASSERTING terms of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of products etc. which says nothing about the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING dynamic where, for example, there is SHRINKAGE of the WILDERNESS in CONJUGATE relation with the GROWTH of CULTIVATION of land, these two together constituting TRANSFORMATION of the overall LANDSCAPE.
The FALL FROM GRACE is to lose touch with one’s sense of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum and become intellectually conscious of, and LOCKED IN to the BINARY LOGIC notions of GOOD and BAD. Once the graceful youth becomes INTELLECTUALLY focused on there being GOOD (graceful) and BAD (clumsy) ways of moving one’s body (i.e. GOOD: the aesthetically pleasing way as with birds in flight etc., and BAD: the awkward way coming from the intellectual calculations of the internal intellect which are “deliberate” and calculated and DISCONNECTED from one’s sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum), the movement is going to be intellectually contrived and coming from the individual himself, rather than from the transforming relational continuum as in ‘skating to where the puck is going to be’.
In WESTERN CULTURE social collectives, in particular, people are bombarded with intellectual advice advising us to do things this way or that WITHOUT CARING ABOUT OUR UNIQUE AND PARTICULAR SITUATIONAL EXPERIENCE WITHIN A RELATIONAL WEB OF INFLUENCES, a consciousness and sensitivity of which as in taking one’s place in the natural scheme of things is the source of GRACE. Once one puts INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION into an unnatural primacy over one’s sense-experience of situational inclusion in the transforming relational continuum, one undergoes a FALL FROM GRACE’.
* * *
If we were users of the indigenous aboriginal languages our speech would form language based REPRESENTATIONS, for example, in terms of TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, … but as WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, we employ a different kind of language where our language-based REPRESENTATIONS are in terms of ‘the TOWN that is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’. This latter WESTERN CULTURE linguistic representation gives the sense of a LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHOR of actions and development wherein the former indigenous aboriginal (and Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta linguistic representation gives the sense of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) AUTHORING.
The FALL FROM GRACE alludes to the coming of SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS aka EGO, …. and it comes through LANGUAGE and the ability of LANGUAGE to construct MECHANISTIC REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY (i.e. of a mechanistic SUBSTITUTE REALITY) in which the connective substance of the SPATIAL PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD is DENIED IN WESTERN CULTURE simply because it is INVISIBLE and a NEW SUBSTITUTE REALITY IS CONSTRUCTED WITH LANGUAGE that is GROUNDED in MATERIAL OBJECTS with GRAMMAR-given POWERS of AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, hence the WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC representation; ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’, …. as contrasted with the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL QUANTUM LOGIC representation; “there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.
WE CAN IMAGINE how the mind shifts from this NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT sense of self in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms where we see ourselves and material forms in general as CONDENSATIONS in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, … to the very different LOCAL and EXPLICIT sense of self in the BINARY LOGIC terms where we see ourselves and material forms in general as INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BODIES in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.
Now we inherit what Pre-Socratic philosophers refer to as THE BURDEN OF CONCRETENESS because so long as there a fluid continuum or energy-charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD in which we are relational forms, our movements are part of the overall transformation and while we are CO-AUTHORS of the transformation, we are NOT INDEPENDENT but INNATELY INTER-DEPENDENT in the manner of WHORLING in FLUID FLOWING.
It is the same as where we are participants in freeway traffic and, by our relative movements, participate in the forming and transforming of relational conduits, the opening of navigable channels that inductively inspire our male asserting actions.
A COMPOSITE of RECENT SUMMARY POSTS can be found here
The PRIMARY FINDING of my philosophical researching is that while we are inclusions within a WAVE-FIELD CONTINUUM, our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is REDUCTIONIST and we set about to TRYING to explain ourselves by breaking things down into the LCOAL AND EXPLICIT even though the UNDERSTANDING that we seek to share is WAVE-FIELD based which means it is RELATIONAL, NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT. This problem is like trying to share an awareness of the LANDSCAPE by way of describing the TOWNS and other LOCAL FEATURES. This is the REDUCTIONIST approach which starts by DIFFERENTIATING THINGS and FOLLOWING UP with INTEGRATION.
IT DOESN’T WORK, NOT EVEN IN MATHEMATICS where we end up having to refer to a CONSTANT OF INTEGRATION in which we package all the bits that FELL OUT in the process of DIFFERENTIATION in one AMORPHOUS CONSTANT.
In a LANDSCAPE ‘pock-marked’ with TOWNS, if one describes the TOWNS, their GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of products as in the REDUCTIONIST approach, we find ourselves UNABLE TO PUT HUMPTY DUMPTY back together again and we are left with a multiplicity of MAPS of the TOWNS and these MAPS are FLATSPACE things based on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT which is what our common MAPPING approach delivers, a FLAT-SPACE REDUCTION of a spherical space reality. In the SPHERICAL SPACE of our sense-experience of inclusion therein, EVERYTHING IS RELATED and while RELATIONS can communicate the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as is the make-up of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM of our sense experience of inclusion therein, … we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have adopted as our standard, a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that REDUCES the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD REALITY to a MULTIPLICITY OF FRAGMENTS which are LOCAL and EXPLICIT.