ted lumley

Why bother READING this essay, which looks DIFFICULT?  My answer is that this essay EXPLAINS where we have built MISTAKES into our WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing scheme which are conjusing us and rendering our actions and interactions confused.  For example, we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which enables us to say things (construct linguistic conceptualizations) such as ‘the TOWN is growing’ which is only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate aspect of what our SENSE-EXPERIENCE is reporting on, which is that THE LANDSCAPE is TRANSFORMING.  The TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE included NOT ONLY that “the TOWN is GROWING” which is just the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate of the ANDROGYNOUS dynamic of transformation wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS which opens up in conjugate relation with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWING of the TOWN.  OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION BACKED AWARENESS can OPEN UP to THREE LEVELS of AWARENESS here, only ONE OF WHICH is given MAINSTREAM use in our WESTERN CULTURE common LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING approach; i.e. the one where we speak in terms of ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ (male asserting/actualizing) without bringing into play our AWARENESS of the conjugate ‘SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS’ that comes together with ‘the GROWING OF THE TOWN’, these two ‘AWARENESSES’ combining with a THIRD LEVE OF AWARENESS to go with the other two.  So LEVEL 3 AWARENESS is the GROWTH of the TOWN, the LEVEL 2 AWARENESS is the SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS, and the LEVEL 1 AWARENESS is the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE.

As Erich Jantsch has pointed out, LEVEL 1 AWARENESS (the LANDSCAPE IS TRANSFORMING) includes LEVEL 2 AWARENESS (the WILDERNESS IS SHRINKING) which included LEVEL 3 AWARENESS (the TOWN IS GROWING).   We know that if we speak in LEVEL 3 AWARENESS terms, sayinig ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, this PROPOSITION is INCOMPLETE, and this is an example of Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS OF ALL FINITE PROPOSITIONS OF LOGIC.  That is, while the proposition ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ is “TRUE”, it is INCOMPLETE because it fails to acknowledge the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS and the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE, and all of these THREE LEVELS OF AWARENESS are TRUE IN A LOGICAL SENSE but INCOMPLETE in a SENSE-EXPERIENCE CONTEXT.

We know that when TRUMP says “DRILL BABY DRILL”, he is using language that corresponds to LEVEL 3 AWARENESS wherein, while it may be TRUE that oil may be discovered and produced, there is no mention of the SHRINKING of the underground oil accumulation leading to earthquakes and collapsing of oil-filled porous rocks when the oil is removed.  This is LEVEL 3 AWARENESS whereas AWARENESS LEVEL 2 will include cognition of the SHRINKING of the fluid content of the porous rock and AWARENESS LEVEL 1 will acknowledge the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE as understood from an AWARENESS wherein SUBJECT and OBJECT are ONLY ONE; i.e. where we are AWARE of our INCLUSION in the world that we are looking out at;

THINGS ARE DIFFERENT where we are in a state of AWARENESS of our INCLUSION in SOMETHING GREATER THAN OURSELVES (TRANSFORMATION)

–––  QUANTUM (BOTH/AND) LOGIC INCLUSION OF MAN-IN-EARTH (CONDENSATION OF WAVE-FIELD IN WAVE-FIELD): 

 This we know, the earth does not belong to man, man belongs to the earth. This we know. All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected. Whatever befalls the earth, befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”— “Chief Seattle”

But we continue to struggle with a lesser, BINARY LOGIC based form of AWARENESS

––– BINARY (EITHER/OR) LOGIC SPLIT OF MAN AND EARTH (“MATERIAL BEING” IN EMPTY SPACE): 

Genesis 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

This supports the LEVEL 3 CONSERVATIVE and LEVEL 2 LIBERAL modes of AWARENESS wherein we believe we are INDEPENDENT BEINGS with our own DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR given powers of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments as if we were NON-INCLUDED VISITORS.

The whites, too, shall pass – perhaps sooner than other tribes. Continue to contaminate your bed, and you will one night suffocate in your own waste. When the buffalo are all slaughtered, the wild horses all tamed, the secret corners of the forest heavy with the scent of many men, and the view of the ripe hills blotted by the talking wires, where is the thicket? Gone. Where is the eagle? Gone. And what is it to say goodbye to the swift and the hunt? The end of living and the beginning of survival.

 * * * * * * * * * * * 

READER BEWARE:

“AWARENESS” is a kind of OPENING UP of our SENSES to the WORLD we are included in, and AWARENESS is GRADATIONAL in that it can range from our SENSE OF INCLUSION in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM to our CROW’S EYE SCRUTINIZING of particular things at a distance which we can FOCUS INTENSELY ON.  For example, it was noted during the French Revolution that women observing beheadings on the Guillotine became so transfixed as they watched people getting their heads removed that they became prey for street urchins who would come behind them, lift their skirts and freely grope them without encountering any resistance from the women transfixed by their AWARENESS of the grotesque goings-on.

Erich Jantsch describes THREE DIFFERENT LANGUAGE-SUPPORTED DEPTHS of AWARENESS that range from “MOST AWARE” through “LESS AWARE” to “LEAST AWARE” which we know as CONSERVATIVE (LEAST AWARE), LIBERAL (next to LEAST AWARE) and TRANSFORMATIONAL (most aware), and shows that while MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta constitute the MOST AWARE condition, WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZIN tends to be BLOCKED from ACCESSING the MOST AWARE CONDITION due to BELIEF IN LOCAL AUTHORING.

“LOCAL AUTHORING” is ABSTRACTION based on LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION which as Nietzsche points out makes use of the “DOUBLE ERROR” of NAMING and GRAMMAR that DIVIDES PEOPLE INTO TWO OPPOSING, POLARIZED collectives.  While the CONSERVATIVE GROUP believes in LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments wherein the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is the primary world dynamic, the LIBERAL GROUP believes in LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments in a CONJUGATE combination of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING together with MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.  For example, while the CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS supports the understanding that the TOWN IS GROWING, the LIBERAL AWARENESS supports the understanding of “THE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS…”TOGETHER WITH” … THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN”.   TRUMP’S CONSERVATIVE “DRILL BABY DRILL” exemplifies the use of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “PRODUCTION” as if in ITS OWN RIGHT (out of the context of TRANSFORMATION); i.e. within a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME wherein GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION are ‘taken to be’ “REAL” (without, as in the LIBERAL AWARENESS, being seen TOGETHER WITH the conjugates of “SHRINKING of WILDERNESS”, “DEGENERATION of DEVELOPMENT” and “CONSUMPTION of PRODUCTION”).

A WESTERN CULTURE PROBLEM IS THAT LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF AWARENESS IS COMMONLY CONSTRAINED to LEVELS 3 and 2 and is “HELD BACK” FROM EVER GETTING TO AWARENESS LEVEL 1 (TRANSFORMATION) BECAUSE OF A PERSISTING POLARIZING CONFLICT between CONSERVATIVES WITH THEIR LOCAL AUTHORING BASED ON MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AND LIBERALS WITH THEIR LOCAL AUTHORING BASED ON THE COMBINATION OF FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING “AND” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.

CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS ARE SO PRE-OCCUPIED WITH PROMOTING and DEFENDING THEIR PREFERRED, RADICALLY DIFFERING  “LOCAL AUTHORING” SCHEMES THAT THEY ARE BOTH “BLINDED” TO THE EXISTENCE of the LEVEL 1 AWARENESS which RESOLVES the POLARIZING DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AWARENESS LEVELS 3 (CONSERVATIVE) and LEVEL 2 (LIBERAL).  For example, while the CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS of “DRILL BABY DRILL” SUPPORTS MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘PRODUCTION’ while IGNORING the conjugate FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING, THE LIBERAL ENVIRONMENT-SENSITIVE AWARENESS NOT ONLY ENVISAGES GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION BUT IS ALSO AWARE OF THE CONJUGATE … “SHRINKING of WILDERNESS”, “DEGENERATING of DEVELOPMENT” and “CONSUMPTION of PRODUCTION”.    While it is common for CONSERVATIVES to speak in terms of the CONSTRUCTION OF THE TOWN as if this one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate was MEANINGFUL, the extended LIBERAL AWARENESS which includes the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS is also ‘taken into account’, and this constitutes an EXPANDED LIBERAL AWARENESS (which is getting close to acknowledging the overall TRANSFORMING of the the LANDSCAPE) as compared to the LIMITED CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS.  

Suppose that LIBERALS were NOT using LANGUAGE that supported the ‘DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’ based (ego-inflated) ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ of actions and developments but were instead on the same AWARENESS LEVEL as Chief Seattle where the AUTHORING is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in TRANSFORMATION that we all share inclusion in?  This is the understanding that is supported by MODERN PHYSICS and by AWARENESS such as; Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.” —Chief Seattle .

In this LEVEL 1 TRANSFORMATIONAL AWARENESS, WE BECOME ONE WITH THE WORLD.  That is, our LEVEL 1 LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME shifts from employing a “BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM” basis of MATERIAL FORMS in ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE to a QUANTUM “BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM” basis of MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS in the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (transforming relational continuum).  In LEVEL 1 AWARENESS, there is NO LONGER ANY BINARY LOGIC splitting into MATTER and SPACE as prevails in AWARENESS LEVELS 3 (CONSERVATIVE) and AWARENESS LEVEL 2 (LIBERAL) and there is ONLY ONE THING, i.e. the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which material forms are “SCHAUMKOMMEN” (appearance), in the manner of WHORLINGS in FLOWING where the WHORLINGS are NOT SEPARATE THINGS but part of the APPEARANCE of FLOWING.  As Schroedinger points out;  

“The world is given to me only once, not one existing and one perceived. Subject and object are only one. The barrier between them cannot be said to have broken down as a result of recent experience in the physical sciences, for this barrier does not exist.” …Erwin Schroedinger

“What we observe as material bodies and forces are nothing but shapes and variations in the structure of space. Particles are just schaumkommen (appearances)” —Erwin Schroedinger

In this LEVEL 1 mode of AWARENESS understood by indigenous aboriginals and by MODERN PHYSICS, all ‘things’ are condensations of and within the energy-charged plenum aka the transforming relational continuum aka wave-field.

 * * * * * * * * 

NOW I NEED TO TIE SOME LOOSE ENDS TOGETHER WHICH BELONG TOGETHER and which have BECOME SEPARATED DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “REMAIN STUCK WITH THE HABITUAL USE OF A TOO-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME” WHICH is the SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

THE MISTAKEN (“DOUBLE ERROR” based) BELIEF IN “LOCAL AUTHORING” ON THE PART OF WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS has led to the POLARIZING SPLIT INTO CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL FACTIONS.

THE REALITY IS that NEITHER THE CONSERVATIVE NOR LIBERAL MODES OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING ‘WORK’ BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH DEPENDENT ON TOO-SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC.  The POLARIZED CONFLICT between CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS has meanwhile DIVIDED the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE which has become so PRE-OCCUPIED with POLITICAL OPPOSITION that the POINT IS BEING MISSED that their DISAGREEMENT DERIVES FROM THEIR GIVING A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO TOO-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC IN THEIR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES. 

The TOO-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME OF THE CONSERVATIVE FACTION comes from the use of ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as in ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ while the LESS SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME of the LIBERAL FACTION comes from an evolving acknowledgement of our INTERCONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE (Note that while INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS  (as well as MODERN PHYSICS) understand this INTERCONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE to be THE BASIC REALITY as in “Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”, the WESTERN CULTURE PRACTICE, encouraged by WHATEVER CONCEPTUALIZATIONS WE BUILD INTO OUR LANGUAGE, continues to support INDEPENDENT BEING which is MOST PRONOUNCED in CONSERVATIVE politics while IN LIBERAL POLITICS, is giving way to AWARENESS of INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE by way our inclusion in a common ENVIRONMENT (note: one can imagine this continuing shift in WESTERN CULTURE CONCEPTUALIZING as an ongoing acknowledgement of the importance of the environment we are evidently included in which is most evident in LIBERALISM while CONSERVATIVES persist in supporting the full abstraction of MATERIAL HUMAN BEINGS IN EMPTY INFINITE SPACE as persists in our linguistich conceptualizing scheme).

Already in the 1970s numerous studies of legislative voting on environmental measures, both in the U.S. Congress and in a number of state administrations, found conservative legislators to have significantly lower pro-environmental voting records than their liberal colleagues (see Kamieniecki 1995 and the references therein). This tendency has not changed since but rather, the cleavage between liberals and conservatives on environmental issues has grown substantially in the past decades (Dunlap, Xiao, and McCright 2001). For example, a number of current studies, especially on the topic of climate change, find in general that liberals show higher levels of environmental concern than conservatives   (Wood and Vedlitz, 2007; McCright and Dunlap, 2010, 2011b).—The politics of environmental concern: A cross-national analysis, Raphael J Nawrotzki

THE HOLD UP in our move to less simple QUANTUM (BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM) from simple BINARY (EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM) is the DEEP ENTRENCHEMENT in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of the ABSOLUTE DIVISION between MATTER and “EMPTY SPACE” and since we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS continue to employ BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’ which exemplifies the ABSTRACTION of LOCAL AUTHORING by way of NAMING and GRAMMAR, we PERPETUATE OUR OWN ENTRAPMENT in TOO-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.

MODERN PHYSICS has meanwhile ENDORSED THE UNDERSTANDING THAT WE ARE ALL INCLUDED AS CONDENSATIONS IN THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is an ENDORSEMENT of Chief Seattle’s observation; … “Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”

FINALIZING THIS “READER BEWARE” COMMENT:   In this “READER BEWARE” comment, I am trying to encourage the reader’s cognizance of the fact that this language I am using is TOO SIMPLE to convey what I would like to convey.  I am in the same plight as Lao Tzu when he wrote “The Tao that can be told is NOT THE TRUE TAO”.

I AM TRYING TO AROUSE THE (LEVEL 1) CORE OF YOUR (the READER’S) AWARENESS to SHARE LEVEL 1 AWARENESS based UNDERSTANDING and this is, in WESTERN CULTURE DIALOGUE, DIFFICULT TO ACHIEVE because ONCE ONE PROCESSES LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS and brings them onboard into AWARENESS LEVEL 3 or AWARENESS LEVEL 2, there NO LONGER EXISTS any LOCAL AWARENESS LEVEL 1 CONTENT. One might express this in the terms that while AWARENESS LEVEL 1 is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, AWARENESS LEVELS 2 and 3 are alternative forms of  LOCAL and EXPLICIT expression (e.g. SOLAR IRRADIANCE THAT IS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT INDUCES the EMERGENCE of (A) HURRICANE DYNAMICS that stir up the ATMOSPHERE, or (B) ATMOSPHERIC DYNAMICS that stir up HURRICANES. If we FORGET about the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATIVE origin of what is going on here, we may DIVIDE INTO TWO OPPOSING GROUPS, A CONSERVATIVE GROUP CONTENDING THAT THE HURRICANE IS STIRRING UP THE ATMOSPHERE and a LIBERAL GROUP CONTENDING THAT THE ATMOSPHERE IS STIRRING UP THE HURRICANE [note that these propositions are both LOCAL and EXPLICIT and there is no mention of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATIVE origin of what is going on here.]

ONCE we break the AWARENESS down into 3 different categories whereby Chief Seattle’s AWARENESS is understood as the HIGHEST LEVEL 1 AWARENESS, we can understand LEVEL 2 AWARENESS and LEVEL 3 AWARENESS as LESSER (INCOMPLETE) AWARENESS LEVELS and thus we have the tools to understand the ARTIFICIALITY of the POLARIZING DISAGREEMENT between supporters of LEVEL 3 (CONSERVATIVE) and LEVEL 2 (LIBERAL) AWARENESS in which case, IT IS A WASTE OF TIME to participate in ARGUMENTS AS TO WHICH IS CORRECT, LEVEL 3 AWARENESS or LEVEL 2 AWARENESS, because NEITHER IS “CORRECT” and what is CONFUSING is that BOTH CAN BE TRUE due to Goedel’s Theorem of INCOMPLETENESS of all FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITION.

The LEVEL 3 CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS GIVEN BY EITHER/OR PROPOSITION such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ may be TRUE but they are INCOMPLETE in that they are LOCAL and EXPLICIT TRUTHS.

The LEVEL 2 LIBERAL AWARENESS GIVEN by EITHER/OR PROPOSITIONS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING and the WILDERNESS is SHRINKING’ may be TRUE but they are INCOMPLETE in that they are LOCAL and EXPLICIT TRUTHS.

The LEVEL 1 TRANSFORMATIVE AWARENESS GIVEN by BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM as given by; ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is beyond the simple BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM ‘reality’ based on that which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT, and is instead the less simple QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM reality based on that which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  That is, ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and our INCLUSION THEREIN is in the same ‘QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM’ relational sense as the CONDENSATION of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

SO, THE KEY POINT IN FINALIZING THIS “READER BEWARE” COMMENT”: is that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have access to THREE LEVELS of AWARENESS; the CONSERVATIVE, LIBERAL and TRANSFORMATIONAL LEVELS OF AWARENESS and that the LOWER TWO LEVELS OF AWARENESS; i.e. the LEVEL 3 CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS and the LEVEL 2 LIBERAL AWARENESS ARE BOTH CONSTRAINED TO THE CONSTRUCTIONS that are LOCAL and EXPLICIT and thus BINARY LOGIC based, and only the LEVEL 1 AWARENESS is an AWARENESS of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

WESTERN CULTURE, by using LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that supports both LEVEL 3 AWARENESS and LEVEL 2 AWARENESS sets the stage for UNRESOLVABLE CONFLICT between CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL AWARENESS LEVELS, BOTH OF WHICH ARE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT ORIENTED BUT WHICH DIFFER IN THAT; “in general liberals show higher levels of environmental concern than conservatives” 

FOR ANYONE TO SHOW CONCERNS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND AN ASSOCIATED NEED TO “TAKE BETTER CARE OF THE ENVIRONMENT”, THE INFERENCE IS THE BINARY LOGIC based view wherein THEY DO NOT CONSIDER THEMSELVES TO BE ‘INCLUDED’ IN AN ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM AS UNDERSTOOD IN MODERN PHYSICS; The world is given to me only once, not one existing and one perceived. Subject and object are only one. The barrier between them cannot be said to have broken down as a result of recent experience in the physical sciences, for this barrier does not exist.” …Erwin Schroedinger

THE ‘BOTTOM LINE’ IS THAT THERE ARE NO ‘LOCAL AUTHORS’ of actions and development (all action is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) in which case the BASIS for DIFFERENCES in policies and views of CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS DO NOT EXIST.

Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

END OF: “READER BEWARE” COMMENT: 

 * * * * * * * * 

ABSTRACT:  ALL MATERIAL FORMS, INCLUDING OURSELVES ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING, TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka “ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM” aka “WAVE-FIELD”.   Our WESTERN CULTURE has developed a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that is based on the ABSTRACTIONS of “LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEING BASED ENTITIES” and “ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE”, while MODERN PHYSICS along with INDIGENENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURES, TAOISM/BUDDHISM and ADVAITA VEDANTA have developed a FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME THAT ACKNOWLEDGES our INCLUSION in the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

The TITLE ; “What’s Wrong with TRUMP and MUSK? (and ‘what’s wrong with us?’) draws attention to the fact that our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme ‘works’ by CONSTRUCTING A SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO-REALITY using the ABSTRACTIONS of NAMING-INSTANTIATED, LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL BODIES with NOTIONAL (GRAMMAR-GIVEN) POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.

This constitutes a SUBSTITUTE PSEUDO-REALITY based on FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM (the transforming plenum is dropped out and ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE is SUBSTITUTED, which constitutes the REMOVAL of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING (wave-field) conjugate TOGETHER WITH THE ‘PROMOTING’ OF THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate as the LOCAL AUTHORING SOURCE).

Thus, instead of the TRANSFORMATION based understanding wherein, for example, “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING substitutes “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods”  (that’s all that is spoken of in the CONSERVATIVE  version of linguistic conceptualizing of reality), and (as is included in the LIBERAL version of linguistic conceptualizing of reality) “AND there is a CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS”.

What we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are thus doing with our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme is that we are giving ourselves what Erich Jantsch refers to as THREE LEVELS OF AWARENESS that we can BRING FORTH WITH LANGUAGE in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING; i.e.  THE FULLY AWARE TRANSFORMATION based understanding which is LEVEL ONE AWARENESS ,  (e.g. THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” ) or, we may BRING FORTH in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, the LESS AWARE LIBERAL based undestanding which is LEVEL TWO AWARENESS, (e.g. the TOWN is GROWING AND there is a conjugate SHRINKING of WILDERNESS) or, we may BRING FORTH in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING the LEAST AWARE CONSERVATIVE  based understanding which is LEVEL THREE AWARENESS (e.g. the the TOWN IS GROWING … full stop).

 * * * 

For indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, there is a tradition of grounding understanding in LEVEL ONE AWARENESS which acknowledges INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin).

For WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, the common belief in LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, which Nietzsche has pointed out DERIVES FROM THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR, is the source of LEVEL 3 CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS, and LEVEL 2 LIBERAL AWARENESS.  BOTH LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES endorse the ERROR of LOCAL AUTHORING and while CONSERVATIVES (e.g. DONALD TRUMP and ELON MUSK) succumb to the SIMPLE AWARENESS LEVEL 3 based on MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING e.g. “OUR OPERATIONS ARE GROWING” , … LIBERALS (e.g. JOE BIDEN) succumb to the LESS SIMPLE AWARENESS LEVEL 2 based on MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING … and conjugate … FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING.

Whatever we do in the sense of our MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, there is at the same time, a CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING that comes with it (for example, WITH THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONSTRUCTION OF THE TOWN COMES THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING opening up by way of the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS).

WE ARE FAMILIAR with how CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS POLARIZE HERE in that TRUMP’S ‘DRILL BABY DRILL’ is exemplary of one-sided, “ALL MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING” while DROPPING OUT any ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of the conjugate “FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING” (the changes in the land assocated with extraction).  This CONSERVATIVE focus on MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DRILLING and PRODUCTION while IGNORING the conjugate FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING collapse of depleted oil and gas reservoirs, loss of clear air from oil and gas combustion products, distinguishes the CONSERVATIVE from the LIBERAL APPROACH.  The CONSERVATIVE LEVEL 3 AWARENESS based focus on GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of hydrocarbons (DRILL BABY DRILL), is a one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING approach that is MISSING LEVEL 2 LIBERAL AWARENESS of the need for balancing the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING with FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING, DEGENERATIING and CONSUMING.

The CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS LEVEL 3 IGNORING of an important part of what is actually happening i.e. the ignoring that there is a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate (such as ‘the WILDERNESS IS SHRINKING’) together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWTH OF CONSTRUCTION, IS NOT THE CASE WITH LIBERALS due to their LEVEL 2 AWARENESS.  This DIFFERENCE in CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL AWARENESS LEVELS is the source of POLARIZING CONFLICT wherein WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES SPLIT into POLARIZED CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL FACTIONS.

THIS SPLIT INTO POLARIZED CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL FACTIONS DERIVES FROM THE EGO-based BELIEF IN LOCAL AUTHORING.

LOCAL AUTHORING DOES NOT EXIST IN OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY.

LOCAL AUTHORING IS ABSTRACTION DERIVING FROM THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMAR (Nietzsche)

THE CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL SPLIT IS A BOGUS LOCAL AUTHORING BASED DIVISION THAT WAS MOCKED BY JONATHAN SWIFT IN HIS DEPICTION of TORIES and WHIGS as Brobdignabmians and Lilliputians in GULLIVER’S TRAVELS.  SWIFT exposured their polarizing differences as being equivalent to an argument over which was the PROPER END of a boiled egg to make entry; i.e. the ROUNDY END OR THE POINTY END.

Today’s version of this POINTLESS DIVISION in WESTERN CULTURE social collectives, into CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS is based on whether LOCAL AUTHORING should be understood in a (ONE-TO-MANY; “one bad apple spoils the barrel”) context (CONSERVATIVE) or in a (MANY-TO-ONE; “it takes a whole community to raise a child”) CONTEXT.

WAIT A MINUTE!  THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” since we share inclusion in a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX. As Nietzsche has pointed out,  “LOCAL AUTHORING” is a “DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR”.

As in Jonathan Swift’s GULLIVERS TRAVELS SATIRE, the SPLIT into CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS is based on the BOGUS, EGOTISTICAL BELIEF IN “LOCAL AUTHORING” of actions and development.   As MODERN PHYSICS affirms, as also indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” of actions and developments.   The indigenous aboriginal “HEALING CIRCLE” acknowledges, as MODERN PHYSICS also acknowledges that the dynamics we share inclusion in as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING”, THUS THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE AWARENESS LEVEL 3 and 2 CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL CONFLICT, but there is instead a LEVEL 1 AWARENESS of our INCLUSION in the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

* * * * * END OF ABSTRACT * * * * * 

(more…)

Western CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS have been shown to be troubled by DYSFUNCTION arising from TOO SIMPLE LANGUAGE and how this leads to FRAGMENTATION and OBCURANTISM in the WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHE which manifests in WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS.

-1- FRAGMENTATION, as Nietzsche and Bohm both show, derives from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which REDUCES our natural understanding of REALITY as TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational), and RECASTS REALITY in LOCAL and EXPLICIT TERMS.  Our SENSE EXPERIENCE informs us of our INCLUSION IN A TRANSFORMING WORLD, which DOES NOT LEND ITSELF TO LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING BASED ON THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT, as Nietzsche points out with his ‘LIGHTNING FLASHES’ example which REDUCES this “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT” phenomena (buildup of electromagnetic field based tensions) to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT “LIGHTNING FLASHES”.

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are AWARE, at some level in our psyche, that the REAL WORLD OF OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE is a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, as Heraclitus sussed out, and which indigenous aboriginals NOT ONLY SUSSED OUT but CAPTURED IN THEIR LANGUAGE DESIGN.  By building in a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE for acknowledging our inclusion in TRANSFORMATION that is NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT the indigenous aboriginal language THUS AVOIDS THE ERROR of WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING WHEREIN “LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORING” HIJACKS THE FOUNDATIONAL ROLE of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANFORMATION.  In the film ‘DANCES WITH WOLVES’ the indigneous aboriginal naming convention that suggests inclusion in ‘the transforming web-of-life’ is used, suggesting that our primary status is INCLUSION IN THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, whereas our WESTERN CULTURE ‘DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMAR gives us “JOHN DUNBAR” as an ‘INDEPENDENT BEING WITH HIS OWN POWERS LOCAL AUTHORING of EXPLICIT ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.

WESTERN CULTURE HABITUALLY EMPLOYS THE ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR to FRAGMENT the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM of our sense-experience (of inclusion therein).  The term ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ was applied by Nietzsche who pointed out the ARTIFICIALITY OF THE NOTION of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ which is CREATED by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, which is the source of FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE AND THOUGHT, which is PROBLEMATIC.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” because, as indigenous aboriginals have NOT FORGOTTEN and as MODERN PHYSICS has affirmed, MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING, TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which is an ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS, constituting a BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM relationship wherein the CONDENSATION is “BOTH” ITSELF “AND” the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM IT IS INCLUDED IN.

NOTA BENE!  This BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM RELATION is a FUNDAMENTAL DEPARTURE in UNDERSTANDING REALITY, … FROM THE SIMPLE WESTERN CULTURE STANDARD BINARY EITHER/OR LOGICOF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM based UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY which we have BUILT IN TO OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME.  THIS BOTH/AND LOGIC IS THE DEPARTURE supported by Heraclitus that has been affirmed by Modern physics and which is the foundational belief in indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.  THIS LESS SIMPLE THAN BINARY LOGIC, (QUANTUM) BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM based UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY wherein TRANSFORMATION is FOUNDATIONAL, and wherein CONDENSATIONS are “APPEARANCES” that are continually FORMING and RE-FORMING (TRANSFORMING) within an ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (like WHORLINGS IN FLOWING where the WHORLINGS are part of the APPEARANCE of FLOWING and ARE NOT LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES).  This is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM relationship which is LESS SIMPLE than SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM wherein the WHORL is ‘spoken of’ and thus regarded as a LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF with ITS OWN POWER OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE DEVELOPED A KNEE-JERK HABIT OF USING LANGUAGE THAT IMPUTES LOCAL EXPLICIT “BEING” to WHORLINGS IN THE FLOWING that are APPEARANCE based NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FLOW PHENOMENA, which is without dependence on the abstraction of LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING.

(more…)

ABSTRACT: 

Our sense-experience based understanding is that we are included in a matrix of interconnections and interdependencies as with ‘strands in the web’. The relational dynamics in this case are QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM based.  But, in WESTERN CULTURE, there has evolved a BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which portrays people as INDEPENDENT BEINGS notionally WITH THEIR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, opening the way to abstract concepts such as THE TERRORIST which TOTALLY OBSCURES, in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZINGS, the actual, sense-experience affirmed reality of our INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE .  IN BINARY LOGIC THINKING, the designation of TERRORIST RECASTS the REAL PROBLEM of RELATIONAL DISSONANCE IN THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, in the SIMPLE BUT FALSE BINARY LOGIC based EITHER/OR  terms of THE GUILTY and INNOCENT’, FALSELY implying that the STRAND IN THE WEB that becomes a CONDUIT for the VIOLENT EXPRESSION of TENSIONS in the SOCIAL RELATIONAL WEB, is a LOCAL, INDEPENDENT SOURCE of VIOLENCE, A FALSE CONCEPT that which WALLPAPERS OVER and RENDERS INVISIBLE the ACTUAL REALITY of the “TOXIC ENVIRONMENT” (TOXICITY in the form of DISSONANCE IN THE SOCIAL RELATIONAL MATRIX).

ingAs we know from our sense experience, there are TOXIC SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTS that manifest through “MINER’S CANARIES” whose violent behaviour stems from the TOXICITY of the SOCIAL RELATIONAL MATRIX they share INCLUSION IN.  WESTERN CULTURE, by using SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC, describes the WILD STRAND-IN-THE-WEB as an INDEPENDENT BEING wose actions are FULLY and SOLELY LOCALLY AUTHORED, which MAKES NO SENSE as far as SENSE-EXPRIENCE GOES, but is an INTELLECTUAL BINARY LOGIC based SIMPLIFICATION that is common to WESTERN CULTURE, a CULTURE for whom the notion of DISSONANCE in the relational social matrix that elicits the remedy of HEALING CIRCLES as in indigenous aboriginal cultures, IS TOTALLY FOREIGN.

THE LABEL of TERRORIST is at the same time, a CERTIFICATE of EXONERATION of all other QUOTE/UNQUOTE “INDEPENDENT BEINGS” in the COMMUNITY .  It is a CERTIFICATE of EXEPTION from the QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY of INCLUSION IN TOXIC WESTERN CULTURE ENVIRONMENTS wherein the “TERRORIST” is the WESTERN CULTURE NAME for the “MINER’S CANARY” which “LETS ORDINARY CITIZENS OFF THE HOOK”, which is NOT THE WORST RESULT of this ERROR.  The more PROBLEMATIC RESULT is that ALL EFFORTS TO RESOLVE THE PROBLEM TURN THEIR BACK ON THE TOXIC ENVIRONMENT, leaving it to continue to fester, while focusing remedial actions  on the EARLY DETECTION OF TERRORISTS (the MINER’S CANARIES) even as the FREQUENCY OF “TERRORIST INCIDENTS” contues to rise due to the the lack of addressing the REAL ISSUE which is the TOXICITY of the ENVIRONMENT.  

 * * * 

WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING has gone GLOBAL and with it, the HABIT of reducing our CONCEPTUALIZING from its less simple QUANTUM LOGIC  ‘fluid’ STRUCTURE  that captures continuing FLUID transformation, as in “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” , to the simpler BINARY LOGIC ‘material being’ STRUCTURE  which FRAGMENTS the continuum and presents things in a PARTS-WISE fashion, as in “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods” .  WE can ‘SEE’ in the QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD structure wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING (RECEPTOR) is given by the words “in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”  while the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING (EFFECTOR) is given by “THERE IS TOWNING” .  WESTERN CULTURE has adopted A SIMPLIFIED MODE OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING WHEREIN THE FEMALE RECEPTOR, which conveys NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “CONTEXT”  (i.e. the RECEPTOR as given by “in the transforming landscape”) is DROPPED OUT, leaving ON ITS OWN, LOCAL and EXPLICIT “CONTENT” (i.e. the EFFECTOR as given by “There is towning”).   WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, by ‘DROPPING OUT ‘ the RECEPTOR, leaves the EFFECTOR “FLOATING IN EMPTY SPACE” in which case the ANDROGYNOUS dynamic of TRANSFORMATION is OBSCURED as we FORMULATE our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING in the ONE-SIDED TERMS of EFFECTOR-driven actions and development. THIS “DROPPING OUT” of the RECEPTOR (termed the DEA ABSCONDITA or GODDESS in HIDING) manifests in what Nietzsche calls the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which supports one-sided EFFECTOR-based dynamics as if within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, while obscuring the ‘full wave-field’ dynamic of the TRANSFORMING relational continuum.  This WESTERN CULTURE DROPPING OUT of the RECEPTOR in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is, as Bohm and Schroedinger point out, the SOURCE of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING which is DIVISIVE since a minority continue to acknowledge the REALITY of the RECEPTOR in spite of our WESTERN CULTURE practice of LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM.

RECEPTOR WITH EFFECTOR: “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.   (THE QUANTUM LOGIC of MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta).  Here, the EFFECTOR (local and explicit) is the CONDENSATION of-and-within the RECEPTOR (nonlocal end implicit) where the RECEPTOR is the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD, the resulting CONIUNCTIO OPPOSITORUM constitutes TRANSFORMATION.

EFFECTOR WITHOUT RECEPTOR: “The TOWN is growing, developing and producing goods”.  (THE BINARY LOGIC that prevails in WESTERN CULTURE).  Here the EFFECTOR (local and explicit) is imagined as if operating in ABSOLUTE EMPTY, INFINITE SPACE thanks to the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which portrays the EFFECTOR as the LOCAL AUTHOR of actions and development.  The MISSING RECEPTOR (the energy-charged PLENUM) that WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING DROPS OUT, is alluded to as the DEA ABSCONDITA (GODDESS IN HIDING), which is the DROPOUT that comes with BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM aka EXCLUDED RECEPTOR.

BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC AS DIFFERENTIATING OPERATOR:   BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC serves as a DIFFERENTIATING OPERATOR that SELECTIVELY HIGHLIGHTS the CONDENSATION, ISOLATING AND PROMOTING THE CONDENSATION TO NOTIONAL PRIMARY STATUS by SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE in place of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD in which THERE IS ONLY THE “APPEARANCE” of “INDEPENDENCE”.  The MISSING PLENUM (DEA ABSCONDITA) which is the FOUNDATIONAL, ACTIVE TRANSFORMING MEDIUM within which the CONDENSATION is “APPEARANCE” (in the manner of a WHORLING in FLOWING), which Schroedinger terms ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ is FALSELY promoted and presented in ABSOLUTE BEING-within-EMPTY SPACE STATUS. This SLEIGHT OF HAND LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that SELECTS OUT the CONDENSATION by the “DOUBLE ERROR” of NAMING and GRAMMAR (Nietzsche) thus bestows on this FLOW-FEATURE, PRIMARY AUTHORING AGENT STATUS.  This SUBSTITUTING of BEING based MECHANICS for WAVE-FIELD based TRANSFORMATION in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, while a radical departure from the FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, now serves as the POPULAR WESTERN CULTURE “OPERATIVE REALITY” and is the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

This note explains the SPLIT in WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS with some people SUPPORTING Luigi Mangione (who shot and killed United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson), while MOST DO NOT.  I am inserting the QUALIFIER of WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS because it is WESTERN CULTURE where BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING (which is involved in this case) is commonly used even though BINARY LOGIC is a “BEING”-BASED SIMPLIFYING LOGIC used in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that DROPS out essential meaning that can be captured in the LESS SIMPLE FLOW-BASED QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is employed in MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, all of which AVOID the “too simple” BINARY LOGIC in their LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  Examples of each are as follows;

QUANTUM LOGIC (all-including flow-based) is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein EVERYTHING IS IN RELATIONAL FLUX (TRANSFORMATION) as in ‘There is TOWNING in conjugate relation with the SHRINKING WILDERNESS in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.  This is the MODERN PHYSICS understanding where everything is in flux and THERE IS NO DEPENDENCE ON “BEING”.  In the language of Modern physics (and indigenous aboriginals) one would say the equivalent of THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE where the TOWNING is “BOTH” the TOWNING (which is like a whorling in the flowing) “AND” at the same time, the FLOWING it is included in.  The TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, like the WHORLING in the FLOWING is “BOTH” the dynamic form itself “AND” the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  So, in both cases the relationship is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.  The INCLUDING MEDIUM is the ‘FLOWING’ or the ‘TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ while the TOWNING or the WHORLING are the ‘APPEARANCE’’; i.e. the TOWNING is APPEARANCE associated with the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and the WHORLING is APPEARANCE associated with the FLOWING.  In Schroedinger’s words

“What we observe as material bodies and forces are nothing but shapes and variations in the structure of space. Particles are just schaumkommen (appearances)””

In indigenous aboriginal LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING as also in MODERN PHYSICS, we would say things in flow-based languages which would be equivalent to “there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” or “there is WHORLING in the FLOWING” where EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX and we convey the QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where THE WHORLING “IS THE APPEARANCE” of THE FLOWING and where THE TOWNING “IS THE APPEARANCE” of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  THIS RELATIONSHIP WHEREIN ALL FORMS ARE FEATURES WITHIN THE FLOW IS THE QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC RELATION.

     BINARY LOGIC (beings-in-empty-space based) is the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM which DIFFERS RADICALLY FROM QUANTUM LOGIC .  BINARY LOGIC relations would be the case if we MIS-INTERPRETED the QUANTUM LOGIC phenomena by imputing INDEPENDENT BEING to the TOWN and to the WHORL and using what Nietzsche calls the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which implies LOCAL AUTHORING by saying “THE TOWN IS GROWING” and ‘the WHORL IS GROWING”.  THESE ASSOCIATIONS TAKE US INTO THE “BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION WORLD” WHERE WE LOSE A LOT OF REAL, SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE UNDERSTANDING, INCLUDING THE FACT THAT ‘EVERYTHING IS RELATED’ (MITAKUYE OYASIN).  These DROP-OUTS in passing from QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION include the loss of the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of CONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE OF ALL MATERIAL FORMS as in the BOTH/AND (quantum logic) CONDENSATIONS and WAVE-FIELD relation SYMBOLIZED in indigenous aboriginal cultures by the BOTH/AND (quantum logic) STRANDS and WEB RELATION

NOTE THAT THIS LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING DOUBLE ERROR PLOY IS THE SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM which COMES WITH DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMAR based LOCAL AUTHORING; e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ is an example of FRAGMENTATION since we have artificially, with the first error of NAMING, SPLIT THE TOWNING OUT OF THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, GIVING IT LOCAL, INDEPENDENT ‘BEING’ as ‘THE TOWN’, and with the second error of GRAMMAR, IMPUTING TO THE NEWLY-CREATED BEING, “ITS OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS”, at least as far our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS are concerned.

  (more…)

How we get FOOLED by the Cuckoo’s Egg of BINARY LOGIC

WE NEED QUANTUM LOGIC!

QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC

QUANTUM LOGIC is where we say “There is HUMANING in the transforming continuum” (where everything is in flux and humanings are included flow-features)

BINARY LOGIC is where we say “Yesterday, I saw three HUMANS walking down the street” (where Humans are BEING based CONTENT situated in a separate CONTAINER).

QUANTUM LOGIC is “BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM” where “HUMANINGS are BOTH FEATURES in the FLOWING MEDIUM like WHORLINGS in FLOWING, and, are at the same time, the FLOWING MEDIUM”

* * *

BINARY LOGIC is “EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM” where “HUMANS” are INDEPENDENT beings in empty space that we know by their material components.

“Now, what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else. You can only form the minds of reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of any service to them.  This is the principle on which I bring up my own children, and this is the principle on which I bring up these children.  Stick to the Facts, sir!”

‘Bitzer,’ said Thomas Gradgrind.  ‘Your definition of a horse.’

‘Quadruped. Graminivorous. Forty teeth, namely twenty-four grinders, four eye-teeth, and twelve incisive. Sheds coat in the spring; in marshy countries, sheds hoofs, too. Hoofs hard, but requiring to be shod with iron. Age known by marks in mouth.’ Thus (and much more) Bitzer.

— Charles Dickens, ‘Hard Times’

QUANTUM LOGIC is relational and WITHOUT DEPENDENCY ON ‘THINGS’, and we use it to come to understand things PURELY by way of relations.  Geoffrey Chew is a QUANTUM PHYSICS researcher and he describes ‘bootstrapping’ (building understanding up solely from relations), like this.

[Geoffrey Chew]: “when you formulate a question, you have to have some basic concepts that you are accepting in order to formulate the question.  But in the bootstrap approach, where the whole system represents a network of relationships without any firm foundation, the description of subject can be begun at a great variety of different places.  There isn’t any clear starting point.  And the way our theory has developed in the last few years, we quite typically don’t know what questions to ask.  We use consistency as the guide, and each increase in the consistency suggests something that is incomplete, but it rarely takes the form of a well-defined question.  We are going beyond the whole question-and-answer framework’.

BINARY LOGIC IS USED TO UNDERSTAND THINGS IN TERMS OF INDEPENDENT “MATERIAL BEINGS” EXPLAINABLE BY THEIR LOCAL, EXPLICIT COMPONENTS.

QUANTUM LOGIC IS USED TO UNDERSTAND THINGS PURELY IN TERMS OF RELATIONS WITHOUT ANY FOUNDATIONAL DEPENDENCY ON “BEING”

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES ARE QUANTUM LOGIC BASED (RELATIONS BASED); e.g. “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”. (or, “THERE IS HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM”

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES ARE BINARY LOGIC BASED (BEING BASED); e.g. “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING GOODS”, (or, “THE HUMAN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING GOODS”

* * * * * *

We can see from this comparison that WHILE WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES BUILD IN DEPENDENCY ON ‘BEING’ (“THINGS THAT ARE SAID TO MATERIALLY EXIST”) and “WHAT THINGS DO”, indigenous aboriginal languages are RELATIONAL and without dependency on the ABSTRACTION of NAMING-INSTANTIATED “BEING” (e.g. instead using relational inference such as ‘dances with wolves’).

(more…)