ted lumley

FORWARD/OVERVIEW to: The Tricky Linguistics of Wave-Field PEAK and TROUGH

This STORY, TOLD DIRECTLY, is that we live in a WAVE-FIELD world which means that our LANGUAGE, in order to convey our ACTUAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE must be capable of conveying ANDROGYNOUS dynamics, wherein the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING agency and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING recipient ARE ONLY ONE.  This is describing the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the MALE ASSERTING is INCLUDED IN the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING, as in TRANSFORMATION.

ACHTUNG! NOTA BENE!  WHERE WHESTERN CULTURE IS GOING WRONG in developing a LANGUAG HABIT (linguistic conceptualizing habit) which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate (i.e. the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM) by substituting ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE and KEEPING ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, as is the now popular WESTERN CULTURE language usage, which is equivalent to INVENTING A NEW ABSTRACT PSEUDO-REALITY based ON BINARY LOGIC wherin the PRIMARY physical phenomen;i.e. the WAVE-FIELD, is OBSCURED while in its place there remains ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate as if operating NOT AS A CONDENSATION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM but as a NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE, INDEPENDENT MATERIAL THING-IN-ITSELF moving and developing WITHIN A NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH CAREFULLY because what I have learned in my philosophical explorations into how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are “SCREWING UP OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING”, is that while our sense-experience is of our living in a QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC world wherein material forms BOTH THEMSELVES AND AT THE SAME TIME, THEIR CONTAINING MEDIUM (e.g. consider a WHORLING in a FLOWING.  In this sitation, ‘THE WHORLING IS THE FLOWING’; i.e. it is part of the APPEARANCE of flowing and THE WHORLING is “NOT” a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF, but only an ‘APPEARANCE’.  That applies generally so that, for example, while there is HUMANING and TOWNING and FORESTING in the WAVE-FIELD (aka the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM), there are no LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES as are referred to as HUMANS, TOWNS and FORESTS, notionally with THEIR OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS such as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods.

This understanding of reality as an all-including energy-charged plenum bearing within it material condensations is the understanding of MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.

In this reality (Modern physics and Eastern/indigenous aboriginal reality), LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is FLOW-BASED and FLOW is QUANTUM LOGIC

wer have to describe the fact that the WAVE-FIELD energy is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and is PRIMARY while the LOCAL and EXPLICIT energy is APPEARANCE.   We may give credit to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT for actions and development but that is only APPEARANCE (Scheumkommen) and real credit for actions and developmment is coming from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

The LOCAL and EXPLICIT statement; “the men are constructing a village in the countryside ” makes NO MENTION of the REALITY of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS in which case the CONSTRUCTION OF THE VILLAGE “IS NOT REALITY” but is only APPEARANCE and if we ‘add back in’ the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS, we get the LESS SIMPLIFIED UNDERSTAND OF REALITY as the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE that includes “BOTH” the CONSTRUCTION of the VILLAGE “AND” the conjugate schrinking of WILDERNESS.

While the FLOW-BASED linguages of indigenous aboriginals and MODERN PHYSICS serves up LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which includes, in a TWO-IN-ONE sense, “BOTH” the GROWTH of the VILLAGE “AND” the onjugate SHRINKING of WILDERNESS which, taken together, are the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are in the habit of using a simplified form of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION that employ only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate and DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, substituting in its place, ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

 * * * * * * * 

What I want to emphasize, because it tends to get LOST IN THE SHUFFLE, is that we cannot TRUST LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that treats WAVE-PEAK and WAVE-TROUGH as TWO SEPARATE THINGS which is what BINARY LOGIC allows us to do, and then we say that the WAVE-PEAK is PUSHING (asserting) and the WAVE-TROUGH is PULLING (accommodating) and after we do this, WESTERN CULTURE EGOTISTS will affirm that the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate “IS DOING ALL THE WORK” and we may as well DROP OUT MENTION of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate and simplify our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING by employ ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.

This is what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE NOW DOING, but as Nietzsche has pointed out, this is achieved with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  This gives us a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING capability that supports FRAGMENTATION because ONCE ONE GETS RID OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, which BRINGS TO BEAR the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD ASPECT, we have unleashed a DUMBED DOWN LANGUAGE that is capable of producing FRAGMENTED perspectives which are LOCAL and EXPLICIT, as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINTITE SPACE.

The KEY THING HERE IS THAT THE GRAND SCREW-UP IN WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS is coming from the WESTERN CULTURE ABSTRACT, LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING where we (A) SPLIT UP the WAVE-FIELD into TWO SEPARATE PARTS; e.g. the PEAK and the TROUGH.   This is NONSENSE because while the PEAK appears to be LOCAL and EXPLICIT, the TROUGH is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is NOT STAND-ALONE CONTENT but is CONTENT that must be INFORMED BY NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT RELATIONAL CONTEXT.

The DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, as pointed out by Nietzsche, is a recipe FRAGMENTATION in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  We may say that the WAVE-PEAKS keep bashing the stranded boat against the reocks but it is the WAVE-TROUGH that keeps sucking it back in and setting it up from another WAVE-PEAK bashing.

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are IMPRESSED by the WAVE-PEAK, the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING  and are employing LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING wherein we credit THE WAVE-PEAK with CRASHING INTO THE CROCKS as if it were legitimate to understanding such phenomena in one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALING ONLY TERMS; i.e. in LOCAL and EXPLICIT TERMS without taking into consideration the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT influence of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING  WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.   Linguistic conceptualization-wise, it is far simpler to STICK TO the LOCAL and EXPLICIT as if there was NO NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT INFLUENCE, thus while vionce in an indigenous aboriginal culture manifests, the entire community comes together in a HEALING CIRCLE sine the ASSUMPTION IS that the violence derives from the INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT social relational matrix in which case the INDIVDUAL HOLDING THE SMOKING GUN is the CONDUIT BUT VIOLENT ENERGY RELEASE but NOT THE SOURCE.

WESTERN CULTURE, by using LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING TO (A) EMPLOY NAMING to IDENTIFY A LOCAL AUTHOR and (B) EMPLOY GRAMMAR ‘ARM’ the NAMING-INSTANTIATED NOTIONAL ‘AUTHOR’, imputes a LOCAL AUTHORING SOURCE for everything. This LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that imputes LOCAL AUTHORING of events, must first EXPLAIN AWAY that everything is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT in nature (Which makes sense when we understand we are living in a relational matrix wherein EVERYTHING is INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT.

show nietzsche quote on DOUBLE ERROR HERE.

& &  & & 7

For those peoples or tribes whose languages ackowledge that we are living in a WAVE-FIELD, as indigenous aboriginals IN EFFECT acknowledge with their understandIng expressed by MITAKUYE OYASIN (everything is related) which is the QUANTUM LOGIC relation; i.e. the BOTH/AND logic of the including medium where SPACE is NOT EMPTY, IT IS FULL; i.e. it is the all-including WAVE-FIELD wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD.  These CONDENSATIONS are, at the same time, BOTH themselves, material condensations AND, at the same time, the ENERGY-CHARGED-MEDIUM (aka WAVE-FIELD) they are included in.  This QUANTUM LOGIC relation is exemplified by the WHORLING in the FLOWING in a stream or in the atmosphere; i.e. the WHORLING “APPEARS to be an INDEPENDENT THING but that is just APPEARANCE or as Schroedinger says ‘Schaumkommen’.

As Heraclitus said, and as reaffirmed by indigenous aboriginals, and by Nietzsche and Bohm, EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.  This is how it is when one lives in a WAVE-FIELD reality as we all do.

NOW COMES LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, and as Nietzsche pointed out, in our WESTERN CULTURE, EGO has progressively pushed the notion that HUMANS are INDEPENDENT BEING, notionally with their own POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, hence WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS identify individuals are LOCAL AUTHORS of particular material actions, development and production.

POST-SHAKESPEAREAN WESTERN CULTURE

The TRICKY LINGUISTICS of Wave-Field PEAK and TROUGH

The “WAVE-PEAK” is treated of in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING as a LOCAL and EXPLICIT “BEING” based influence.  This is Schaumkommen (Appearance), that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE and THINKING “PORTRAYS” in a BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC sense as if THE “WAVE-PEAK” (there is no such thing in sense-experience reality as a “WAVE-PEAK” since WAVES DO NOT SPLIT into a PEAK and a TROUGH; i.e. the PEAK and TROUGH form is only ‘APPEARANCE’‘.

In using ‘APPEARANCE’ as the basis for LINGUISTIC DISCUSSION of WAVE-FIELD dynamics, we speak of a ‘WAVE’ as having BOTH a PEAK and a TROUGH and in WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing, we speak of a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENCY that is fully and solely responsible for LOCAL and EXPLICIT actions and development; e.g. ‘The waves crashed into the beached boat and demolished it.’  Though, in sense-experience affirmed actuality, the WAVE-TROUGH repetitively pulled the boat partly off the rocks before the WAVE-PEAK returned to hammer it into and onto the rocks, our standard WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing mentions ONLY the WAVE-PEAK action which is the BINARY LOGIC “LOCAL, EXPLICIT” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-PEAK ACTION.

The “WAVE-TROUGH” is something NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT,  which is A PURELY RELATIONAL influence that is without its own BEING,   which, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE and THINKING is PORTRAYED in a SECONDARY LIGHT, as if it were the PASSIVE INTERVAL BETWEEN TWO ACTIVE PEAKS; i.e. as if the PEAKS were LOCAL, EXPLICIT, “INDEPENDENT” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING  AGENTS, while the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING TROUGHS WERE SECONDARY NON-CONTRIBUTING ‘FILLERS-IN’ like the SPANDREL in Cathedral architecture.

THE HUMONGOUS ERROR of WESTERN CULTURE is the DESIGNING of LANGUAGE that FALSELY PROMOTES THE “LOCAL AND EXPLICIT WAVE-PEAK TO PRIMARY ACTION SOURCING AGENT WHILE DROPPING OUT THE ACTUAL PRIMARY ACTION SOURCING AGENT; i.e THE “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-TROUGH.

The SPLITTING OUT of the WAVE-PEAK and setting it up ON ITS OWN, requires the ABSTRACT NULLING OUT of its WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, the WAVE-TROUGH, which is in reality, the PRIMARY AGENCY since the WAVE-FIELD is innately NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT while its LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING “DUMB-DOWN” to “LOCAL and EXPLICIT” is “APPEARANCE” based; i.e. THERE IS NOTHING LOCAL AND EXPLICIT ABOUT WAVE-FIELD PHENOMENA.

The terms NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT DESCRIBE THE BASIC NATURE OF THE WAVE-FIELD and the fact that WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS LIMIT OUR FOCUS to certain aspects of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) and use LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is supported by what Nietzsche has pointed out is a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, to come up with a reduction to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT does not mean that such SIMPLIFYING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING (e.g. BINARY LOGIC MATERIAL BEINGS IN EMPTY SPACE) is in accord with the QUANTUM LOGIC world of our SENSE EXPERIENCE  (e.g. QUANTUM LOGIC CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM AKA WAVE-FIELD).

THE “LOCAL and EXPLICIT” PEAKS together with THE “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT” TROUGH comprise the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC.  The perceived MULTIPLICITY of LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘INDEPENDENT’ PEAKS are only APPEARANCE but have been given FOUNDATIONAL STATUS in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING practice, SHUTTING OUT the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TROUGH which is a LESS SIMPLE FOUNDATION WHEREIN ALL MATERIAL THINGS ARE RELATED BY VIRTUE OF ALL MATERIAL THINGS BEING CONDENSATIONS OF THE ONE, ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM AKA WAVE-FIELD. 

TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE 

(more…)

“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm

What this means is that“WE ARE ALL RELATED” (mitakuye oyasin)  as with the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM where material “CONDENSATIONS -OF-THE-MEDIUM”, like WHORLINGS in the FLOWING, while having a DISTINGUISHING APPEARANCE, are INCLUDED FEATURES OF THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

The indigenous aboriginal culture understands this QUANTUM LOGIC pattern in NATURE wherein ALL THINGS ARE RELATED, where there is no such thing as LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, as is basic in the BINARY LOGIC based linguistic conceptualizings of WESTERN CULTURE.  In the aboriginal culture, the violent act is understood as having been cultivated in the relational social matrix so that the violent PERSON is seen as the CONDUIT through whom the tensions brewed in the social collective are vented.  RESTORATIVE JUSTICE by means of the HEALING CIRCLE is the natural response to outbursts of violence rather than scapegoating the CONDUIT through which community-brewed tensions are vented.

BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC IS TOO SIMPLE A BASE FOR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC REALITY IN THAT BINARY LOGIC REQUIRES EMPTY SPACE AS ‘INSULATOR’ TO SUPPORT THE ABSTRACTION OF SEPARATE OBJECTS which WESTERN CULTURE makes out to be the LOCAL AUTHORS of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS (using the device of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR).  This is in marked contrast to the QUANTUM PHYSICS and indigenous aboriginal ‘relational web-of-life’ understanding of actions and developments being of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational origin) and only LOCAL and EXPLICIT in APPEARANCE in the manner that SOLAR IRRADIANCE FIELDS which are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT are the primary source of LOCAL and EXPLICIT high pressure and low pressure circulations in the oceans and atmosphere,’

WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing, in spite of our sense-experience affirming that everything is in flux, employs the ‘DOUBLE ERROR” combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘push’ to the high pressure and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ‘pull’  to the low pressure, thus providing a pseudo-explanation of these CONJUGATE WAVE-FIELD COMPONENTS in LOCAL, EXPLICIT terms.   This tactic may be popularly affirmed by the ‘petitio principii of ‘does this low pressure suck?’ … and… ‘does this high pressure push’?   The petitio pincipii error akin to Nietzsche’s example of ‘lightning flashes’ where the lightning IS THE flashing.  Likewise, the low pressure IS THE sucking and the high pressure IS THE pushing.  Meanwhile, the DOUBLE  ERROR construct WRONGLY implies LOCAL AUTHORING which is a a work-around for the problem faced by linguistic conceptualizing challenge associated with capturing the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

BINARY LOGIC itself is a simplifying ‘ruse’ that when applied to explain the WAVE-FIELD phenomena DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate which makes it incapable of capturing the QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD relation which is comprised of the conjugate relation of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING together with FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING.   BINARY LOGIC’S “EITHER/OR” linguistic conceptualization CAN ONLY ‘HANDLE’ the LOCAL and EXPLICIT such as “IS THE TOWN GROWING?”.   There is a problem here in that whether the reality and/or the answer is EITHER yes OR no, … this makes no mention of the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS and thus no mention of the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE.  This suggests that the question “IS THE TOWN GROWING” is NOT about our sense-experience reality since what is going on according to our sense-experience reality is that ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

Some may ARGUE that the simple BINARY LOGIC proposition (IS THE TOWN GROWING) and response is adequate but to an indigenous aboriginal who is likely to be sensitive to, and accustomed to speaking in the flow-based language terms, it is important NOT TO CONCEAL the reality that there is CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS together with GROWING OF THE TOWN.   The CONSTRUCTION OF THE TOWN PART is only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate and this is standard in WESTERN CULTURE to DROP OUT mention of the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and this has been called the DEA ABSCONDITA (GODDESS IN HIDING) because the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate is the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM while the material CONDENSATION such as ‘the TOWN that is GROWING’ … IS NOT SOMETHING REAL, … IT IS ONLY APPEARANCE as is the case with all CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD.  What is REAL is the CONTINUALLY TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

BINARY LOGIC is something we apply to “THE TOWN” as in “THE TOWN IS EITHER LARGER THIS SUMMER THAN LAST SUMMER, or NOT”.   SUCH A QUESTION DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE SO THAT IN USING BINARY LOGIC, WE ARE NOT ‘PLAYING WITH A FULL DECK’.  We have the issue of the DEA ABSCONDITA (GODDESS IN HIDING).

WORSE THAN THIS!  BY DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE we are DROPPING OUT THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD and PRETENDING THAT THE MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD, WHICH ARE ‘APPEARANCE’ only (THE WAVE-FIELD IS NON-VISIBLE) ARE THE OPERATIVE REALITY. 

The “TOWN that is GROWING “is a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that suggests the presence of a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF, notionall with ITS OWN POWERS of AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.  That is the WESTERN CULTURE view.   In the indigenous aboriginal view as also the QUANTUM LOGIC view, what is going on is that we all share inclusion in the transforming relational continuum and in this case there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein everyting is in flux and there are no LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES such as ‘TOWNS’ that ‘GROW’ and ‘DEVELOP’ and ‘PRODUCE GOODS’; these are the products of DIFFERENTIATING the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).

The NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT provides CONTEXT for the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONTENT, but there is a problem here when BINARY LOGIC is employed since BINARY LOGIC is ONLY CAPABLE OF ADDRESSING THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT as in MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES SITUATED IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which means OUT OF THE CONTEXT OF THE CONJUGATE RELATION WITH THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE

THUS, THE POINT IS THAT BINARY LOGIC ACTS AS A FILTER THAT REMOVES LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING’S ACCESS TO THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE WHICH MEANS THAT BINARY LOGIC REMOVES ACCESS TO WAVE-FIELD BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION (BINARY LOGIC GIVES ACCESS ONLY TO MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING). 

BECAUSE LINGUISTIC DISCOURSE CONSTRAINED BY BINARY LOGIC “DROPS OUT” THE CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, THERE WILL BE DROP OUT OF THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT which is the CONTEXTUAL CONTAINER that ENRICHES understanding of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘CONTENT”.

AS WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, WE HAVE ACCESS TO SENSE-EXPERIENCE GROUNDING IN OUR UNDERSTANDING, but for those of us who place UNBALANCED DEPENDENCE on BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, there is NO SUPPORTING CONTEXTUAL GROUNDING and the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, which, on its own (without CONTEXTUAL ENRICHMENT from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT), sources FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM in WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS. 

* * *AUTHOR’S NOTE:  The way I think of the above is that BINARY LOGIC, by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE that comes with QUANTUM LOGIC, brings in, instead, an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE which gives a FREE TICKET to MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DOMINANCE which means that linguistic conceptualizing (expressibility of thought and language) is LIMITED to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (what the TOWN is doing) while the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (transforming landscape influence) is DISABLED, but it is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE that enriches the understanding constrained by the limited reach of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT that is generated by the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate.* * *

* * * * * * * * *

The WESTERN CULTURE Hijacking of Quantum Logic by Binary Logic is the reason why we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are NOT on the ‘same page’ as indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, all of whom are, as David Point pointed out, in accord with QUANTUM PHYSICS.

WESTERN CULTURE is in serious trouble that is manifesting in FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTIST DROP-OUT built into our linguistic conceptualizing scheme.  The FRAGMENTATION is coming from the use of NAMING to invent LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING/S and the OBSCURANTISM is coming from the use of GRAMMAR to impute one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING agency (e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’) which DROPS OUT the WAVE-FIELD conjugate of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING as in ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX as is the basic nature of the WAVE-FIELD.  WESTERN CULTURE’s use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCTING GOODS’ is linguistic conceptualizing that implies the EXISTENCE of a MATERIAL BEING (‘the TOWN’) that has its own powers of GROWING).

The REALITY affirmed by our sense-experience is that ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ … where everything is in flux.   There can be no ‘TOWN THAT IS GROWING’ without a CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, with both of these conjugates being aspects of the ONGOING, and ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is otherwise known the WAVE-FIELD.   The MATERIAL FIGURE or “TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” is in a “QUANTUM BOTH/AND RELATION” where “THE TOWNING” is a CONDENSATION of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is “BOTH” its “LOCAL, EXPLICIT SELF”, … “AND”, … at the same time, the ALL-INCLUDING, NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD.   This QUANTUM LOGIC “BOTH”/”AND” RELATION describes a relation such as a WHORLING in a FLOWING where there in only ONE dynamic entitity, the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD BUT THERE IS THE APPEARANCE of TWO; i.e. the WHORLING and the FLOWING which is just ONE since WHORLING is part of the APPEARANCE of FLOWING and we cannot ‘scoop out a WHORLING’ in a net and put it in a separate ‘holding tank’ because “IT” (the WHORLING) is APPEARANCE and is NOT a THING THAT EXISTS.

I am proceeding ‘carefully’ here as I compose my linguistic conceptualizations because what I am sharing here is a TRICKY MATTER that requires from us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS an OPEN MIND (so as not to be ‘held captive’ by our WESTERN CULTURE common linguistic conceptualizations that are erroneous but which we HABITUALLY employ on a routine basis in spite of their being ‘infected’ with errors.

The KEY POINT is that while our sense-experience is of INCLUSION IN THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is a WAVE-FIELD dynamic that requires QUANTUM LOGIC expression, our intellectual modeling and our simple BEING-based linguistic conceptualizations are SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based while QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE and requires a less simple lingiustic conceptualizing scheme.   In particular, in the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of MODERN PHYSICS, which accords with the indigenous aboriginal linguistic conceptualizing scheme, EVERYTHING IS RELATED in the manner of CONDENSATIONS of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in the PLENUM wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.  This is why researchers such as Zen scholar Alan Watts recommends that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “DROP” our BEING-BASED LANGUAGE and adopt a FLOW-BASED (relational) LANGUAGE.

(more…)

WESTERN CULTURE PEOPLE FALL FOR THE BIG LIES, and it is SO OBVIOUS that the WESTERN CULTURE ESTABLISHMENT, the whole matrix of TOP-DOWN ADMINISTRATIONS, is FALLING FOR THE LIE of “LOCAL AUTHORING” which comes from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.   HEY!  LOCAL AUTHORING IS THE “BIG LIE” THAT IS THE ACCEPTED FOUNDATION OF WESTERN CULTURE.

No matter that Chief Seattle and the whole population of indigenous aboriginals tried to get us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS to WAKE UP from our MESMERIZATION by, as Nietzsche also pointed out was a LIE, the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based BELIEF IN ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ that has been ENDORSED by the ABRAHAMIC RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS of Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING.  IT IS A HUMONGOUS LIE that IS (MIS-) SHAPING WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS.AS IN THE BINARY LOGIC BASED SPLITTING OF PEOPLE INTO THE OPPOSITE CATEGORIES OF ‘GOOD’ and ‘EVIL’ based on the “DOUBLE ERROR” of NAMING and GRAMMAR that is the SOURCE of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

This BIG LIE of “THE LOCAL AUTHOR” is ENFORCED in WESTERN CULTURE by a BINARY LOGIC based system of REWARDS and PUNISHMENTS which REWARDS the “PERCEIVED” AUTHORS OF “GOOD” actions and developments and PUNISHES the “PERCEIVED” AUTHORS of “BAD” actions and developments as part of a PURIFICATIONIST PROGRAM aimed at ensuring that GOOD prevails over BAD in ‘WESTERN CULTURE SOCIETY”.

THIS BIG LIE, where one is taught from childhood to BELIEVE that WE ARE “INDEPENDENT BEINGS” WITH OUR OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, a HUMONGOUS LIE which OBLIGES A FOLLOW-UP LIE whereby we notionally IMAGINE OURSELVES to be SITUATED WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, which means that that the ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS of the INDEPENDENT BEINGS that move about and interact within that space CAN ONLY BE ATTRIBUTED TO THE INDEPENDENT BEINGS.

HEY, NONE OF THIS FUZZINESS of the indigenous aboriginal cultures IS ALLOWED in our WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizings), where the belief is that ‘EVERYTHING is RELATED’ as is also supported by Modern Physics where all material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ONE, All-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.  NOT EVEN THE ‘SYSTEMS SCIENCE’ that has SUPPORTED the indigenous aboriginal understanding that WE SHARE INCLUSION in a world characterized by global interconnectedness an mutual interdependence  …  has been unable to ‘gain access to the microphone’ so that public transmissions continue to be DOMINATED by supporters of the BIG LIE of LOCAL AUTHORING. 

ON AND ON GOES THE BIG LIE OF LOCAL AUTHORING, IMPERVIOUS TO THE CONTINUING DEBUNKING EFFORTS, which continue to BOUNCE OFF THE “BIG LIE”, LOCKED IN AS IT IS BY ‘HIGH SWITCHING COSTS’ including the WESTERN CULTURE LOCAL AUTHORING BASED SYSTEM OF REWARDS AND PUNISHMENTS, that put those who are MOST REWARDED as PROTECTORS of the WESTERN CULTURE “BIG LIE” of LOCAL AUTHORING and its COHORT, the ‘INDEPENDENT BEING’, which is a BINARY LOGIC based SOURCING AGENT that has been BUILT INTO the FOUNDATIONS of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE via DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LOCAL AUTHORING.

SO, HITLER WAS RIGHT!  (about one thing), … that PEOPLE FALL FOR THE “BIG LIE” and what could be a MORE HUMONGOUS LIE than the the one being probagated in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC DISCOURSE every time w we speak in terms of the LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, as when we make statements like ‘the TOWN is GROWING’!   NO!   NO!  NO!, … that is a HUMONGOUS LIE.  What is actually going on does not involve a BEING thing (the TOWN) that is its own LOCAL AUTHORING source of GROWING, … what is actually going on is the BEING-LESS RELATIONAL TRANSFORMING OF THE ALL-INCLUDING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD, as in the indigenous aboriginal and SYTEMS SCIENCE understanding that WE SHARE INCLUSION in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence.

(more…)

INTRODUCTION (the POCKET REFERENCE follows the INTRODUCTION)

PART ONE: THE PROBLEM OF LANGUAGE-SOURCED BEHAVIOURAL (ABERRANT-) ‘NORMALITY’

Almost no-one is going to carry around with them reminders such as David Bohm’s, as to how our common WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing is SCREWING up our UNDERSTANDING of REALITY (the reality of our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum).   Meanwhile, many philosophical investigators have come to the same conclusion; i.e. that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES, including ENGLISH are screwing up our understanding of reality. Wittgenstein, for example, observes;

Die Philosophie ist ein Kampf gegen die Verhexung  unsres Verstandes durch die Mittel unserer Sprache” (Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of our language.)” – Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations

On the same tack, Psychiatrist R.D. Laing has written at length about how WESTERN CULTURE and its language is DRIVING US CRAZY;

What we call ‘normal’ is a product of repression, denial, splitting, projection, introjection and other forms of destructive action on experience.”   — R.D. Laing

This is ALSO what Bohm is talking about in his treatise on FRAGMENTATION.  What Bohm is describing is a WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC wherein the conditions considered NORMAL are growing INCREASINGLY TOXIC.  This was also the finding of psychiatrist Laing in “The Divided Self”, and also the finding of anthropologist Jules Henry in “Culture Against Man”, and also the finding of Ernest Becker expressed in ‘the “Denial of Death”.  This ‘screw-up’ is tied to our WESTERN CULTURE and what Benjamin Whorf classifies as Common Average European Language.   All of these psychiatrists, and anthropologists have homed in on the fact that WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE PROBLEMS STEMMING FROM THE ARCHITECTURE OF OUR LANGUAGE.  SHARING WHAT THESE PROBLEMS IN OUR LANGUAGE ARE, BY MEANS OF THE VERY SAME LANGUAGE THAT HAS THE PROBLEMS, IS TRICKY, LIKE TRYING TO BITE YOUR OWN NOSE.  CLARIFYING what is going on here is the aim of this, “A POCKET REFERENCE to WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC SCREW-UPS”.   If we were speaking Ojibwa, or any of the flow-based languages, we would NOT be having this problem that Laing and the others are drawing to our attention. Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE PROBLEM is coming from our building our language on the basis of BEING rather than on the basis of RELATIONS.

EXAMPLE of the TYPE OF PROBLEM that our BEING based language generates for us.   We know from our sense-experience that there is a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING aspect to our reality which means that LANGUAGE that employs ONLY MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING propositions is MISSING SOMETHING (sometimes termed the DEA ABSCONDITA, “THE GODDESS IN HIDING”).   From the point of view of one who studies the MODERN PHYSICS WAVE-FIELD based structure of this world of our sense-experience, THIS MAKES SENSE because our Euroepan languages, such as this ENGLISH I am now using, DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate.  For example, in WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE, the damage done by a skull-fracturing punch to someone’s head is considered to be FULLY and SOLELY AUTHORED by the thrower of the punch.  This ignores the ever-present FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE wherein the skull may an EGG-SHELL skull whose FRACTURING is due to BOTH the force of the “MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING” conjugate AND TO the “FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING” of a fragile ‘eggshell skull’.

(more…)