ted lumley

ted lumley

to come

Posts by ted lumley

BECOMING AWARE OF OUR LIVING IN A WAVE-FIELD WORLD

0

* * * * * * * * * *

PREFACE: WARNING IN REGARD TO THE DUMBED DOWN LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE USING IN OUR STANDARD COMMUNICATIONS.  My note is in NORMAL ENGLISH which is often SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based where, for example, one may say …“the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods”  which captures ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate without mentioning “the conjugate SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS” which is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate, these conjugates being two sides of the same concept formation; i.e. the WAVE structure.  Beyond LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION is OUR HIGHEST LEVEL of AWARENESS of ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION (Jantsch’s LEVEL 1 AWARENESS) while LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS can come in EITHER LEVEL 2 “LIBERAL AWARENESS” where we acknowledge BOTH the female accommodating/enabling AND the male asserting/actualizing WAVE-FIELD (conjugate) structure, while LEVEL 3 “CONSERVATIVE” AWARENESS is where we acknowledge ONLY the male asserting/actualizing mechanistic DOER-DEED structure.  Our CHOICE of which of these THREE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING “AWARENESS” options to give the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE  to in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING; i.e;   (1) TRANSFORMATIVE AWARENESS where everything is in flux, (2), LIBERAL AWARENESS [where, when there is male-asserting/actualizing GROWTH of the TOWN there is CONJUGATE female accommodating/enabling SHRINKING of WILDERNESS] and CONSERVATIVE  AWARENESS [where there is SIMPLY one-sided male-asserting GROWTH OF THE TOWN as if transpiring in absolute empty and infinite space]. 

These three different levels of AWARENESS are infused into our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES; i.e. MODERN PHYSICS along with INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS give the foundational role in AWARENESS-STIMULATING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to (1) TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT where everything is in flux; e.g. ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.  AWARENESS LEVEL (2) of LIBERALS give the foundational role in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to the androgynous combination of male-asserting/actualizing GROWTH of the TOWN together with acknowledgement of CONJUGATE female accommodating/enabling SHRINKING of WILDERNESS.  AWARENESS LEVEL (3) of CONSERVATIVES give the foundational role in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to one-sided male asserting/actualizing… FULL STOP.  This LIMITED CONSERVATIVE LEVEL 3 AWARENESS is the source of BLINDERED male asserting/actualizing (actions, development and production) taken out of the AWARE context of either the LEVEL 2 conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS or LEVEL 1 AWARENESS of TRANSFORMATION.

 * * * * * * * * * * * * 

The language I just used for LEVEL 3 AWARENESS is composed of a POSITIVE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PROPOSITION which is BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC based which is given a foundational role  in NEWTONIAN PHYSICS and also in the “COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE FAMILY” in general.  As Benjamin Whorf observes, BINARY LOGIC is a SIMPLE LOGIC that derives from the “COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE FAMILY”, and this BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is TOO SIMPLE to capture WAVE-FIELD REALITY which requires the LESS SIMPLE “QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM”, for example “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” .  In this BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM construction, EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX and there is NO DEPENDENCY on MATERIAL “BEING” based entities such as “A TOWN”  (there is only “TOWNING IN THE FLOWING”).    In this QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme, THERE IS NO “BEING” that we can conflate with GRAMMAR to impute to “IT” … “ITS” own POWER of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development (e.g. its own GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING) as if a ‘BEING’ within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, the use of which is a recipe for FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM (eclipsing and wallpapering over the sense-experience affirmable REALITY of TRANSFORMATION).

In sLINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS based on the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM, which is what is used in MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, there is NO DEPENDENCY ON BINARY LOGIC and since BINARY LOGIC is the SOURCE of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM, there is NO FRAGMENTATION nor OBSCURANTISM; e.g; as in our standard WESTERN CULTURE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZINGS, as already stated, we speak in terms such as “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING PRODUCTS whereas when we use QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZINGS, we speak in terms such as “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” wherein everything is in flux and there is no ‘BEING’.

Throughout this essay entitled BECOMING AWARE OF OUR LIVING IN A WAVE-FIELD WORLD”  there is the need to point out the limitations of our COMMONLY USED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme which, for example, imputes the existence of INDEPENDENT BEINGS as if in an empty, infinite space which requires simple BINARY LOGIC whereas the MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta understanding of people as strands in the web of life or as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-ENCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, embody the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING medium make-up; i.e. the STRAND is both ITSELF AND AT THE SAME TIME, THE WEB IT IS INCLUDED IN, and the CONDENSATION is both ITSELF AND AT THE SAME TIME, the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM IT IS INCLUDED IN.

UNLIKE our WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC standard wherein we see things as LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL OBJECTS, … in our MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta QUANTUM LOGIC undestanding, we see the readily visible LOCAL and EXPLICIT as SECONDARY CONDENSATIONS of the NON-VISIBLE, NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD.  WESTERN CULTURE CONFUSION arises through TOO SIMPLE NEWTONIAN PHYSICS which CONFUSES the LOCAL and EXPLICIT for the PRIMARY REALITY (mistaking the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM [the real PRIMARY REALITY] for EMPTY SPACE and assuming its NON-PARTICIPATION when the REALITY is that SPACE IS NOT EMPTY, IT IS AN ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

 “Space is not empty.  It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” David Bohm

The reader of this note on BECOMING AWARE OF OUR LIVING IN A WAVE-FIELD WORLD will be informed that wherever BINARY LOGIC is encountered in citations from our standard WESTERN CULTURE conversations, the reader must do the needed upgrading, thus where there is text that says the TOWN IS GROWING” , the reader must upgrade his own LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, and where there is discussion of WESTERN CULTURE PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE where BINARY LOGIC is used to REWARD GOOD BEINGS and PUNISH BAD BEINGS, the reader must upgrade his LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to QUANTUM LOGIC based RESTORATIVE JUSTICE where the understanding is that outbreaks of violence derive from NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT relational influences within the social matrix, in which case, the WESTERN CULTURE kneejerk response of MISIDENTIFYING the AUTHORING SOURCE as the LOCAL and EXPLICIT holder of the smoking gun while the community members at large are considered INNOCENT UNLESS PROVEN GUILTY, is a MISTAKE that derives from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and AND GRAMMAR based (mis)understanding of LOCAL AUTHORING.

 * * * * * * END OF PREFACE * * * * * *

 

In Modern physics understanding, as in the strands-in-the-web and the condensations of the energy-charged plenum, EVERYTHING IS RELATED (interconnected and interdependent) in which case RESTORATIVE JUSTICE MAKES SENSE where the cause of violence is understood as relational dissonance and the remedy is the restoring of relational harmony, … and NOT as in WESTERN CULTURE where the notion of people as INDEPENDENT BEINGS insulated by ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE leads to the MISUNDERSTANDING of VIOLENCE in terms of LOCAL and EXPLICIT AUTHORING when the reality is those manifesting as the AUTHORS of VIOLENCE are in reality CONDUITS for the VENTING of TENSIONS that build with in the community relational matrix, in which case WESTERN CULTURE PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE is a MISTAKE and RESTORATIVE JUSTICE is what is needed.

WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING in general, because it is SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based, is TOO SIMPLE to capture WAVE-FIELD REALITY.  By contrast, the “QUANTUM” BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM capable LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme of MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents is capable of ANDROGYNOUS LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING whas associates with , , the two conjugates together capturing the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE which  DEVELOPING and

Where this NOTE is ‘going to’, after setting the stage with a comparison of WESTERN CULTURE philosophy versus INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL and EASTERN CULTURE philosophy, is to the philosophy of Gregory Franklin whereby he has developed a way of living which BRIDGES between these TWO philosophical understandings of reality.

BACKGROUND:

Much has been written about the REALITY that we are included in a WAVE-FIELD WORLD, but because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have chosen to develop a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme that is based on SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE “EXCLUDED MEDIUM”, we are DIMINISHING OUR “AWARENESS” (the AWARENESS that is shaped by LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS) because the world we actually live in, the world of our SENSE EXPERIENCE of inclusion within it, as linguistically conceptualized through MODERN PHYSICS, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, is a LESS SIMPLE WORLD that demands LESS SIMPLE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING (than that which is grounded in SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGICOF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM) that is capable of supporting LESS SIMPLE BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM, which can be called QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC to distinguish it from the SIMPLE but COMMON (in WESTERN CULTURE) BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC.

(QUANTUM) BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM describes the world in the MODERN PHYSICS terms of an all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM within which there are CONDENSATIONS so that we have a relationship akin to WHORLINGS (condensations) IN FLOWING (containing energized flow) where the WHORLINGS are only visually distinguishable flow-features or APPEARANCE based, thus the WHORLING is BOTH itself AND the flowing in which case we CANNOT PHYSICALLY separate the WHORLING from the FLOWING so that the only possible MOVEMENT is TRANSFORMATION because EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.

(BINARY) EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM describes the world in the NEWTONIAN PHYSICS terms of an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, LOCALLY POPULATED BY MATERIAL OBJECTS, as gives rise to a PSEUDO-REALITY whererein there is EITHER ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OR ABSOLUTE MATERIAL PRESENCE (BEING).  Here we PSYCHOLOGICALLY and LINGUISTICALLY split the WHORLINGS apart from FLOWING using what Nietzsche calls ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’.  For example, when we say ‘the WHORLING IS GROWING LARGER’, we are using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to notionally (psychologically) endow the WHORLING with “ITS OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT” as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.  The Rudyard Kipling poem “EAST IS EAST AND WEST IS WEST AND NEVER THE TWAIN SHALL MEET” stems from this just described difference in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING the world of our sense-experience; i.e. the WESTERN CULTURE NEWTONIAN LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING based on BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM (e.g. THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE) and the MODERN PHYSICS, INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING based on QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC (e.g. “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING PLENUM” where the TOWNING is a condensed feature within the TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM”).

* * *

OUR AWARENESS of the world, which is conditioned by our differing schemes for LINGUISTICALLY CONCEPTUALIZING the world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION therein, … is influenced (shaped) by the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME we use, and we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have historically opted for a SIMPLE, BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING (e.g. “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING, and PRODUCING goods” … FULL STOP), whereas MODERN PHYSICS, INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS all employ a LESS SIMPLE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which is “QUANTUM” BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM based (e.g. “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”).  In this LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM BOTH/AND CONCEPTUALIZATION, we are reporting on the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which INCLUDES the CONDENSATION, whereas, in the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, we report on notional LOCAL and EXPLICIT FORMS (which are BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS.

In this BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION, there is FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM since the notion of ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE serves as an INSULATOR that keeps separate and independent, the NAMING-INSTANTIATED “MATERIAL OBJECTS” insulated by EMPTY SPACE.  This is a manifesting of the DIFFERENTIATING (FRAGMENTING) POWER OF OUR SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.

The LOCAL and EXPLICIT FRAGMENTS produced by DIFFERENTIATION (which is a psycho-linguistic operation triggered by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR) sets up the notion of the LOCAL AUTHOR of actions and development, as in the example THE TOWN IS GROWING.  This SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION substitutes the SIMPLE LOCAL and EXPLICIT for the LESS SIMPLE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT flow-field dynamic aka the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM wherein FIGURE (local and explicit) and GROUND (nonlocal and implicit) ARE ONLY ONE as in ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

Our WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME FRAGMENTS into LOCAL and EXPLICIT objects, the RELATIONAL CONTINUUM of the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM (the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD) which is UNBOUNDED in SPACETIME and which is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT source of ‘MATERIAL’ CONDENSATIONS.

(more…)

How Many More Years to the WAKE-UP?

0

 

How Many More Years to the WAKE-UP? 

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE TRAPPED OURSELVES IN A MISTAKEN BELIEF IN A BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC BASED WORLD OF BEING and LOCAL AUTHORING.  WHEN DO WE WAKE-UP TO THE REALITY THAT WE LIVE IN A QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC BASED WORLD OF TRANSFORMATION?

We WESTERN CUTURE ADHERENTS invented a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME wherein we cast ourselves as LOCAL AUTHORS of actions and development that move about and interact in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, .. and MODERN PHYSICS has proven WHAT A STUPID MISTAKE THAT IS AND CONTINUES TO BE, and indigenous aboriginals such as Chief Seattle mocked us for it, but WE WESTERN CULTURE ADERENTS ARE PROUD OF OUR STUPIDITY because THE FALSE NOTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING SWELLS THE EGO.   LOCAL AUTHORING also sets up our system of REWARDING and PROLIFERATING THE LOCAL AUTHORING OF GOOD and PUNISHING and ELIMINATING THE LOCAL AUTHORING OF BAD, giving us a PURIFICATIONIST SOCIAL ETHIC.

 

MODERN PHYSICS has informed us HOW SILLY THIS LOCAL AUTHORING NOTION IS, but SYSTEMS SCIENCES have pointed out the amazing STRENGTH of its “LOCK-IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS”.  Having a long-established program of giving REWARDS and SOCIAL STATUS on the basis of LOCAL AUTHORING OF ‘GOOD WORKS’, we have ‘stacked the deck’ of WESTERN CULTURE LEADERSHIP with folks like ELON MUSK and DONALD TRUMP.  WHATEVER HAPPENED TO “OUR WESTERN CULTURE” WISE ELDERS?  AND HOW COME WISE PEOPLE tend NOT TO BE RICH?  WESTERN CULTURE IS BASED ON SCREWED UP PRINCIPLES BUT, as stated, we are LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS, not the least of which is our having given LEADERSHIP POWERS to HIGH ACHIEVING MATERIALISTS even if they ACHIEVE by SCREWING OTHERS out of their just deserts. Our LEADERS are choosing NEW REPLACEMENT LEADERS made in their same likeness; i.e. on the basis of MATERIAL ACHIEVEMENTS (with not too many questions on the details of how achieved).

* * * * * *

ARE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS INTERESTED IN CROSS-COMPARING THE WORKINGS OF INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURES AND TAOISM/BUDDHISM AND ADVAITA VEDANTA WHICH ARE SO HIGHLY ENDORSED BY MODERN PHYSICS  (e.g. by DAVID BOHM, ERWIN SCHROEDINGER) and like-minded others?)

MY EXPERIENCE has been NO, most WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “TAKE IT FOR GRANTED” that our WESTERN CULTURE is the way to go, … or it could be that WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are so caught up in quarrelling about the CONSERVATIVE versus LIBERAL APPROACHES to our CULTURE that we haven’t had time to consider a THIRD OPTION such as the MODERN PHYSICS RECOMMENDED UNDERSTANDINGS of TAOISM/BUDDHISM and ADVAITA VEDANTA and also INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURE, all of which are using the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the understanding is that EVERYTHING IS INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT as has been AFFIRMED BY MODERN PHYSICS.

 

THESE CULTURES employ LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES that are ALL BASICALLY THE SAME, being based on the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein everything is understood to be interconnected and interdependent as with STRANDS IN A WEB, or in MODERN PHYSICS TERMS, AS WITH CONDENSATIONS OF THE INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.   So, these BOTH/AND (BOTH/AND LOGIC) MODERN PHYSICS CONSISTENT CULTURE OPTIONS are largely consistent among themselves and MODERN PHYSICS and DIFFER RADICALLY from our EITHER/OR (EITHER/OR LOGIC) WESTERN CULTURE CONSISTENT OPTIONS.  Here, following, are the BIG DIFFERENCES, and please note that while the BOTH/AND CULTURE OPTION as supported by our REAL-LIFE SENSE EXPERIENCE is validated through MODERN PHYSICS which reaffirms the naturally evolved BOTH/AND LOGIC of indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.  WESTERN CULTURE which is now globally dominant embraces EITHER/OR LOGIC

(more…)

What’s Wrong with TRUMP and MUSK? (and ‘what’s wrong with us?’)

0

Why bother READING this essay, which looks DIFFICULT?  My answer is that this essay EXPLAINS where we have built MISTAKES into our WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing scheme which are conjusing us and rendering our actions and interactions confused.  For example, we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which enables us to say things (construct linguistic conceptualizations) such as ‘the TOWN is growing’ which is only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate aspect of what our SENSE-EXPERIENCE is reporting on, which is that THE LANDSCAPE is TRANSFORMING.  The TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE included NOT ONLY that “the TOWN is GROWING” which is just the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate of the ANDROGYNOUS dynamic of transformation wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS which opens up in conjugate relation with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWING of the TOWN.  OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION BACKED AWARENESS can OPEN UP to THREE LEVELS of AWARENESS here, only ONE OF WHICH is given MAINSTREAM use in our WESTERN CULTURE common LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING approach; i.e. the one where we speak in terms of ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ (male asserting/actualizing) without bringing into play our AWARENESS of the conjugate ‘SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS’ that comes together with ‘the GROWING OF THE TOWN’, these two ‘AWARENESSES’ combining with a THIRD LEVE OF AWARENESS to go with the other two.  So LEVEL 3 AWARENESS is the GROWTH of the TOWN, the LEVEL 2 AWARENESS is the SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS, and the LEVEL 1 AWARENESS is the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE.

As Erich Jantsch has pointed out, LEVEL 1 AWARENESS (the LANDSCAPE IS TRANSFORMING) includes LEVEL 2 AWARENESS (the WILDERNESS IS SHRINKING) which included LEVEL 3 AWARENESS (the TOWN IS GROWING).   We know that if we speak in LEVEL 3 AWARENESS terms, sayinig ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, this PROPOSITION is INCOMPLETE, and this is an example of Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS OF ALL FINITE PROPOSITIONS OF LOGIC.  That is, while the proposition ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ is “TRUE”, it is INCOMPLETE because it fails to acknowledge the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS and the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE, and all of these THREE LEVELS OF AWARENESS are TRUE IN A LOGICAL SENSE but INCOMPLETE in a SENSE-EXPERIENCE CONTEXT.

We know that when TRUMP says “DRILL BABY DRILL”, he is using language that corresponds to LEVEL 3 AWARENESS wherein, while it may be TRUE that oil may be discovered and produced, there is no mention of the SHRINKING of the underground oil accumulation leading to earthquakes and collapsing of oil-filled porous rocks when the oil is removed.  This is LEVEL 3 AWARENESS whereas AWARENESS LEVEL 2 will include cognition of the SHRINKING of the fluid content of the porous rock and AWARENESS LEVEL 1 will acknowledge the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE as understood from an AWARENESS wherein SUBJECT and OBJECT are ONLY ONE; i.e. where we are AWARE of our INCLUSION in the world that we are looking out at;

THINGS ARE DIFFERENT where we are in a state of AWARENESS of our INCLUSION in SOMETHING GREATER THAN OURSELVES (TRANSFORMATION)

–––  QUANTUM (BOTH/AND) LOGIC INCLUSION OF MAN-IN-EARTH (CONDENSATION OF WAVE-FIELD IN WAVE-FIELD): 

 This we know, the earth does not belong to man, man belongs to the earth. This we know. All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected. Whatever befalls the earth, befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”— “Chief Seattle”

But we continue to struggle with a lesser, BINARY LOGIC based form of AWARENESS

––– BINARY (EITHER/OR) LOGIC SPLIT OF MAN AND EARTH (“MATERIAL BEING” IN EMPTY SPACE): 

Genesis 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.

This supports the LEVEL 3 CONSERVATIVE and LEVEL 2 LIBERAL modes of AWARENESS wherein we believe we are INDEPENDENT BEINGS with our own DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR given powers of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments as if we were NON-INCLUDED VISITORS.

The whites, too, shall pass – perhaps sooner than other tribes. Continue to contaminate your bed, and you will one night suffocate in your own waste. When the buffalo are all slaughtered, the wild horses all tamed, the secret corners of the forest heavy with the scent of many men, and the view of the ripe hills blotted by the talking wires, where is the thicket? Gone. Where is the eagle? Gone. And what is it to say goodbye to the swift and the hunt? The end of living and the beginning of survival.

 * * * * * * * * * * * 

 

 

 

READER BEWARE:

“AWARENESS” is a kind of OPENING UP of our SENSES to the WORLD we are included in, and AWARENESS is GRADATIONAL in that it can range from our SENSE OF INCLUSION in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM to our CROW’S EYE SCRUTINIZING of particular things at a distance which we can FOCUS INTENSELY ON.  For example, it was noted during the French Revolution that women observing beheadings on the Guillotine became so transfixed as they watched people getting their heads removed that they became prey for street urchins who would come behind them, lift their skirts and freely grope them without encountering any resistance from the women transfixed by their AWARENESS of the grotesque goings-on.

Erich Jantsch describes THREE DIFFERENT LANGUAGE-SUPPORTED DEPTHS of AWARENESS that range from “MOST AWARE” through “LESS AWARE” to “LEAST AWARE” which we know as CONSERVATIVE (LEAST AWARE), LIBERAL (next to LEAST AWARE) and TRANSFORMATIONAL (most aware), and shows that while MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta constitute the MOST AWARE condition, WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZIN tends to be BLOCKED from ACCESSING the MOST AWARE CONDITION due to BELIEF IN LOCAL AUTHORING.

“LOCAL AUTHORING” is ABSTRACTION based on LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION which as Nietzsche points out makes use of the “DOUBLE ERROR” of NAMING and GRAMMAR that DIVIDES PEOPLE INTO TWO OPPOSING, POLARIZED collectives.  While the CONSERVATIVE GROUP believes in LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments wherein the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is the primary world dynamic, the LIBERAL GROUP believes in LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments in a CONJUGATE combination of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING together with MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.  For example, while the CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS supports the understanding that the TOWN IS GROWING, the LIBERAL AWARENESS supports the understanding of “THE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS…”TOGETHER WITH” … THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN”.   TRUMP’S CONSERVATIVE “DRILL BABY DRILL” exemplifies the use of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “PRODUCTION” as if in ITS OWN RIGHT (out of the context of TRANSFORMATION); i.e. within a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME wherein GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION are ‘taken to be’ “REAL” (without, as in the LIBERAL AWARENESS, being seen TOGETHER WITH the conjugates of “SHRINKING of WILDERNESS”, “DEGENERATION of DEVELOPMENT” and “CONSUMPTION of PRODUCTION”).

A WESTERN CULTURE PROBLEM IS THAT LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF AWARENESS IS COMMONLY CONSTRAINED to LEVELS 3 and 2 and is “HELD BACK” FROM EVER GETTING TO AWARENESS LEVEL 1 (TRANSFORMATION) BECAUSE OF A PERSISTING POLARIZING CONFLICT between CONSERVATIVES WITH THEIR LOCAL AUTHORING BASED ON MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AND LIBERALS WITH THEIR LOCAL AUTHORING BASED ON THE COMBINATION OF FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING “AND” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.

CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS ARE SO PRE-OCCUPIED WITH PROMOTING and DEFENDING THEIR PREFERRED, RADICALLY DIFFERING  “LOCAL AUTHORING” SCHEMES THAT THEY ARE BOTH “BLINDED” TO THE EXISTENCE of the LEVEL 1 AWARENESS which RESOLVES the POLARIZING DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AWARENESS LEVELS 3 (CONSERVATIVE) and LEVEL 2 (LIBERAL).  For example, while the CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS of “DRILL BABY DRILL” SUPPORTS MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘PRODUCTION’ while IGNORING the conjugate FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING, THE LIBERAL ENVIRONMENT-SENSITIVE AWARENESS NOT ONLY ENVISAGES GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION BUT IS ALSO AWARE OF THE CONJUGATE … “SHRINKING of WILDERNESS”, “DEGENERATING of DEVELOPMENT” and “CONSUMPTION of PRODUCTION”.    While it is common for CONSERVATIVES to speak in terms of the CONSTRUCTION OF THE TOWN as if this one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate was MEANINGFUL, the extended LIBERAL AWARENESS which includes the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS is also ‘taken into account’, and this constitutes an EXPANDED LIBERAL AWARENESS (which is getting close to acknowledging the overall TRANSFORMING of the the LANDSCAPE) as compared to the LIMITED CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS.  

Suppose that LIBERALS were NOT using LANGUAGE that supported the ‘DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’ based (ego-inflated) ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ of actions and developments but were instead on the same AWARENESS LEVEL as Chief Seattle where the AUTHORING is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in TRANSFORMATION that we all share inclusion in?  This is the understanding that is supported by MODERN PHYSICS and by AWARENESS such as; Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.” —Chief Seattle .

In this LEVEL 1 TRANSFORMATIONAL AWARENESS, WE BECOME ONE WITH THE WORLD.  That is, our LEVEL 1 LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME shifts from employing a “BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM” basis of MATERIAL FORMS in ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE to a QUANTUM “BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM” basis of MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS in the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (transforming relational continuum).  In LEVEL 1 AWARENESS, there is NO LONGER ANY BINARY LOGIC splitting into MATTER and SPACE as prevails in AWARENESS LEVELS 3 (CONSERVATIVE) and AWARENESS LEVEL 2 (LIBERAL) and there is ONLY ONE THING, i.e. the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which material forms are “SCHAUMKOMMEN” (appearance), in the manner of WHORLINGS in FLOWING where the WHORLINGS are NOT SEPARATE THINGS but part of the APPEARANCE of FLOWING.  As Schroedinger points out;  

“The world is given to me only once, not one existing and one perceived. Subject and object are only one. The barrier between them cannot be said to have broken down as a result of recent experience in the physical sciences, for this barrier does not exist.” …Erwin Schroedinger

“What we observe as material bodies and forces are nothing but shapes and variations in the structure of space. Particles are just schaumkommen (appearances) —Erwin Schroedinger

In this LEVEL 1 mode of AWARENESS understood by indigenous aboriginals and by MODERN PHYSICS, all ‘things’ are condensations of and within the energy-charged plenum aka the transforming relational continuum aka wave-field.

 * * * * * * * * 

NOW I NEED TO TIE SOME LOOSE ENDS TOGETHER WHICH BELONG TOGETHER and which have BECOME SEPARATED DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “REMAIN STUCK WITH THE HABITUAL USE OF A TOO-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME” WHICH is the SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

 

THE MISTAKEN (“DOUBLE ERROR” based) BELIEF IN “LOCAL AUTHORING” ON THE PART OF WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS has led to the POLARIZING SPLIT INTO CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL FACTIONS.

THE REALITY IS that NEITHER THE CONSERVATIVE NOR LIBERAL MODES OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING ‘WORK’ BECAUSE THEY ARE BOTH DEPENDENT ON TOO-SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC.  The POLARIZED CONFLICT between CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS has meanwhile DIVIDED the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE which has become so PRE-OCCUPIED with POLITICAL OPPOSITION that the POINT IS BEING MISSED that their DISAGREEMENT DERIVES FROM THEIR GIVING A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO TOO-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC IN THEIR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES. 

The TOO-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME OF THE CONSERVATIVE FACTION comes from the use of ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as in ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ while the LESS SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME of the LIBERAL FACTION comes from an evolving acknowledgement of our INTERCONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE (Note that while INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS  (as well as MODERN PHYSICS) understand this INTERCONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE to be THE BASIC REALITY as in “Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”, the WESTERN CULTURE PRACTICE, encouraged by WHATEVER CONCEPTUALIZATIONS WE BUILD INTO OUR LANGUAGE, continues to support INDEPENDENT BEING which is MOST PRONOUNCED in CONSERVATIVE politics while IN LIBERAL POLITICS, is giving way to AWARENESS of INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE by way our inclusion in a common ENVIRONMENT (note: one can imagine this continuing shift in WESTERN CULTURE CONCEPTUALIZING as an ongoing acknowledgement of the importance of the environment we are evidently included in which is most evident in LIBERALISM while CONSERVATIVES persist in supporting the full abstraction of MATERIAL HUMAN BEINGS IN EMPTY INFINITE SPACE as persists in our linguistich conceptualizing scheme).

Already in the 1970s numerous studies of legislative voting on environmental measures, both in the U.S. Congress and in a number of state administrations, found conservative legislators to have significantly lower pro-environmental voting records than their liberal colleagues (see  and the references therein). This tendency has not changed since but rather, the cleavage between liberals and conservatives on environmental issues has grown substantially in the past decades (). For example, a number of current studies, especially on the topic of climate change, find in general that liberals show higher levels of environmental concern than conservatives   (Wood and Vedlitz, 2007; McCright and Dunlap, 2010, 2011b).—The politics of environmental concern: A cross-national analysis, Raphael J Nawrotzki

THE HOLD UP in our move to less simple QUANTUM (BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM) from simple BINARY (EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM) is the DEEP ENTRENCHEMENT in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of the ABSOLUTE DIVISION between MATTER and “EMPTY SPACE” and since we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS continue to employ BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’ which exemplifies the ABSTRACTION of LOCAL AUTHORING by way of NAMING and GRAMMAR, we PERPETUATE OUR OWN ENTRAPMENT in TOO-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.

MODERN PHYSICS has meanwhile ENDORSED THE UNDERSTANDING THAT WE ARE ALL INCLUDED AS CONDENSATIONS IN THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is an ENDORSEMENT of Chief Seattle’s observation; … “Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”

FINALIZING THIS “READER BEWARE” COMMENT:   In this “READER BEWARE” comment, I am trying to encourage the reader’s cognizance of the fact that this language I am using is TOO SIMPLE to convey what I would like to convey.  I am in the same plight as Lao Tzu when he wrote “The Tao that can be told is NOT THE TRUE TAO”.

I AM TRYING TO AROUSE THE (LEVEL 1) CORE OF YOUR (the READER’S) AWARENESS to SHARE LEVEL 1 AWARENESS based UNDERSTANDING and this is, in WESTERN CULTURE DIALOGUE, DIFFICULT TO ACHIEVE because ONCE ONE PROCESSES LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS and brings them onboard into AWARENESS LEVEL 3 or AWARENESS LEVEL 2, there NO LONGER EXISTS any LOCAL AWARENESS LEVEL 1 CONTENT. One might express this in the terms that while AWARENESS LEVEL 1 is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, AWARENESS LEVELS 2 and 3 are alternative forms of  LOCAL and EXPLICIT expression (e.g. SOLAR IRRADIANCE THAT IS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT INDUCES the EMERGENCE of (A) HURRICANE DYNAMICS that stir up the ATMOSPHERE, or (B) ATMOSPHERIC DYNAMICS that stir up HURRICANES. If we FORGET about the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATIVE origin of what is going on here, we may DIVIDE INTO TWO OPPOSING GROUPS, A CONSERVATIVE GROUP CONTENDING THAT THE HURRICANE IS STIRRING UP THE ATMOSPHERE and a LIBERAL GROUP CONTENDING THAT THE ATMOSPHERE IS STIRRING UP THE HURRICANE [note that these propositions are both LOCAL and EXPLICIT and there is no mention of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATIVE origin of what is going on here.]

ONCE we break the AWARENESS down into 3 different categories whereby Chief Seattle’s AWARENESS is understood as the HIGHEST LEVEL 1 AWARENESS, we can understand LEVEL 2 AWARENESS and LEVEL 3 AWARENESS as LESSER (INCOMPLETE) AWARENESS LEVELS and thus we have the tools to understand the ARTIFICIALITY of the POLARIZING DISAGREEMENT between supporters of LEVEL 3 (CONSERVATIVE) and LEVEL 2 (LIBERAL) AWARENESS in which case, IT IS A WASTE OF TIME to participate in ARGUMENTS AS TO WHICH IS CORRECT, LEVEL 3 AWARENESS or LEVEL 2 AWARENESS, because NEITHER IS “CORRECT” and what is CONFUSING is that BOTH CAN BE TRUE due to Goedel’s Theorem of INCOMPLETENESS of all FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITION.

The LEVEL 3 CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS GIVEN BY EITHER/OR PROPOSITION such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ may be TRUE but they are INCOMPLETE in that they are LOCAL and EXPLICIT TRUTHS.

The LEVEL 2 LIBERAL AWARENESS GIVEN by EITHER/OR PROPOSITIONS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING and the WILDERNESS is SHRINKING’ may be TRUE but they are INCOMPLETE in that they are LOCAL and EXPLICIT TRUTHS.

The LEVEL 1 TRANSFORMATIVE AWARENESS GIVEN by BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM as given by; ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is beyond the simple BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM ‘reality’ based on that which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT, and is instead the less simple QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM reality based on that which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  That is, ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and our INCLUSION THEREIN is in the same ‘QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM’ relational sense as the CONDENSATION of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

SO, THE KEY POINT IN FINALIZING THIS “READER BEWARE” COMMENT”: is that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have access to THREE LEVELS of AWARENESS; the CONSERVATIVE, LIBERAL and TRANSFORMATIONAL LEVELS OF AWARENESS and that the LOWER TWO LEVELS OF AWARENESS; i.e. the LEVEL 3 CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS and the LEVEL 2 LIBERAL AWARENESS ARE BOTH CONSTRAINED TO THE CONSTRUCTIONS that are LOCAL and EXPLICIT and thus BINARY LOGIC based, and only the LEVEL 1 AWARENESS is an AWARENESS of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

WESTERN CULTURE, by using LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that supports both LEVEL 3 AWARENESS and LEVEL 2 AWARENESS sets the stage for UNRESOLVABLE CONFLICT between CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL AWARENESS LEVELS, BOTH OF WHICH ARE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT ORIENTED BUT WHICH DIFFER IN THAT; “in general liberals show higher levels of environmental concern than conservatives” 

FOR ANYONE TO SHOW CONCERNS FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND AN ASSOCIATED NEED TO “TAKE BETTER CARE OF THE ENVIRONMENT”, THE INFERENCE IS THE BINARY LOGIC based view wherein THEY DO NOT CONSIDER THEMSELVES TO BE ‘INCLUDED’ IN AN ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM AS UNDERSTOOD IN MODERN PHYSICS; The world is given to me only once, not one existing and one perceived. Subject and object are only one. The barrier between them cannot be said to have broken down as a result of recent experience in the physical sciences, for this barrier does not exist.” …Erwin Schroedinger

THE ‘BOTTOM LINE’ IS THAT THERE ARE NO ‘LOCAL AUTHORS’ of actions and development (all action is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) in which case the BASIS for DIFFERENCES in policies and views of CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS DO NOT EXIST.

Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

 

END OF: “READER BEWARE” COMMENT: 

 

 * * * * * * * * 

 

ABSTRACT:  ALL MATERIAL FORMS, INCLUDING OURSELVES ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING, TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka “ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM” aka “WAVE-FIELD”.   Our WESTERN CULTURE has developed a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that is based on the ABSTRACTIONS of “LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEING BASED ENTITIES” and “ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE”, while MODERN PHYSICS along with INDIGENENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURES, TAOISM/BUDDHISM and ADVAITA VEDANTA have developed a FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME THAT ACKNOWLEDGES our INCLUSION in the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

The TITLE ; “What’s Wrong with TRUMP and MUSK? (and ‘what’s wrong with us?’) draws attention to the fact that our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme ‘works’ by CONSTRUCTING A SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO-REALITY using the ABSTRACTIONS of NAMING-INSTANTIATED, LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL BODIES with NOTIONAL (GRAMMAR-GIVEN) POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.

This constitutes a SUBSTITUTE PSEUDO-REALITY based on FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM (the transforming plenum is dropped out and ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE is SUBSTITUTED, which constitutes the REMOVAL of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING (wave-field) conjugate TOGETHER WITH THE ‘PROMOTING’ OF THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate as the LOCAL AUTHORING SOURCE).

Thus, instead of the TRANSFORMATION based understanding wherein, for example, “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING substitutes “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods”  (that’s all that is spoken of in the CONSERVATIVE  version of linguistic conceptualizing of reality), and (as is included in the LIBERAL version of linguistic conceptualizing of reality) “AND there is a CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS”.

What we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are thus doing with our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme is that we are giving ourselves what Erich Jantsch refers to as THREE LEVELS OF AWARENESS that we can BRING FORTH WITH LANGUAGE in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING; i.e.  THE FULLY AWARE TRANSFORMATION based understanding which is LEVEL ONE AWARENESS ,  (e.g. THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” ) or, we may BRING FORTH in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, the LESS AWARE LIBERAL based undestanding which is LEVEL TWO AWARENESS, (e.g. the TOWN is GROWING AND there is a conjugate SHRINKING of WILDERNESS) or, we may BRING FORTH in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING the LEAST AWARE CONSERVATIVE  based understanding which is LEVEL THREE AWARENESS (e.g. the the TOWN IS GROWING … full stop).

 * * * 

For indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, there is a tradition of grounding understanding in LEVEL ONE AWARENESS which acknowledges INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin).

For WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, the common belief in LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, which Nietzsche has pointed out DERIVES FROM THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR, is the source of LEVEL 3 CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS, and LEVEL 2 LIBERAL AWARENESS.  BOTH LIBERALS AND CONSERVATIVES endorse the ERROR of LOCAL AUTHORING and while CONSERVATIVES (e.g. DONALD TRUMP and ELON MUSK) succumb to the SIMPLE AWARENESS LEVEL 3 based on MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING e.g. “OUR OPERATIONS ARE GROWING” , … LIBERALS (e.g. JOE BIDEN) succumb to the LESS SIMPLE AWARENESS LEVEL 2 based on MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING … and conjugate … FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING.

Whatever we do in the sense of our MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, there is at the same time, a CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING that comes with it (for example, WITH THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONSTRUCTION OF THE TOWN COMES THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING opening up by way of the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS).

WE ARE FAMILIAR with how CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS POLARIZE HERE in that TRUMP’S ‘DRILL BABY DRILL’ is exemplary of one-sided, “ALL MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING” while DROPPING OUT any ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of the conjugate “FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING” (the changes in the land assocated with extraction).  This CONSERVATIVE focus on MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DRILLING and PRODUCTION while IGNORING the conjugate FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING collapse of depleted oil and gas reservoirs, loss of clear air from oil and gas combustion products, distinguishes the CONSERVATIVE from the LIBERAL APPROACH.  The CONSERVATIVE LEVEL 3 AWARENESS based focus on GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of hydrocarbons (DRILL BABY DRILL), is a one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING approach that is MISSING LEVEL 2 LIBERAL AWARENESS of the need for balancing the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING with FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING, DEGENERATIING and CONSUMING.

 

The CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS LEVEL 3 IGNORING of an important part of what is actually happening i.e. the ignoring that there is a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate (such as ‘the WILDERNESS IS SHRINKING’) together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWTH OF CONSTRUCTION, IS NOT THE CASE WITH LIBERALS due to their LEVEL 2 AWARENESS.  This DIFFERENCE in CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL AWARENESS LEVELS is the source of POLARIZING CONFLICT wherein WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES SPLIT into POLARIZED CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL FACTIONS.

THIS SPLIT INTO POLARIZED CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL FACTIONS DERIVES FROM THE EGO-based BELIEF IN LOCAL AUTHORING.

LOCAL AUTHORING DOES NOT EXIST IN OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY.

LOCAL AUTHORING IS ABSTRACTION DERIVING FROM THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMAR (Nietzsche)

THE CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL SPLIT IS A BOGUS LOCAL AUTHORING BASED DIVISION THAT WAS MOCKED BY JONATHAN SWIFT IN HIS DEPICTION of TORIES and WHIGS as Brobdignabmians and Lilliputians in GULLIVER’S TRAVELS.  SWIFT exposured their polarizing differences as being equivalent to an argument over which was the PROPER END of a boiled egg to make entry; i.e. the ROUNDY END OR THE POINTY END.

Today’s version of this POINTLESS DIVISION in WESTERN CULTURE social collectives, into CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS is based on whether LOCAL AUTHORING should be understood in a (ONE-TO-MANY; “one bad apple spoils the barrel”) context (CONSERVATIVE) or in a (MANY-TO-ONE; “it takes a whole community to raise a child”) CONTEXT.

WAIT A MINUTE!  THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” since we share inclusion in a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX. As Nietzsche has pointed out,  “LOCAL AUTHORING” is a “DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR”.

As in Jonathan Swift’s GULLIVERS TRAVELS SATIRE, the SPLIT into CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS is based on the BOGUS, EGOTISTICAL BELIEF IN “LOCAL AUTHORING” of actions and development.   As MODERN PHYSICS affirms, as also indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” of actions and developments.   The indigenous aboriginal “HEALING CIRCLE” acknowledges, as MODERN PHYSICS also acknowledges that the dynamics we share inclusion in as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING”, THUS THERE IS NO BASIS FOR THE AWARENESS LEVEL 3 and 2 CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL CONFLICT, but there is instead a LEVEL 1 AWARENESS of our INCLUSION in the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

 

* * * * * END OF ABSTRACT * * * * * 

 

 

 

 

(more…)

The CONFLICTING “GEOMETRY” OF CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL AWARENESS, the HISTORICAL TREND

0

 

A recent historical example of the POLARIZED DISGREEMENT BETWEEN “LIBERAL AWARENESS” and “CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS”

 

For example, nine years ago (this note was written on December 25th, 2011), on the first anniversary of 9/11, CBC interviewer Peter Mansbridge asked then Prime Minister (Canada) Jean Chrétien:

 

“By the end of the day [9/11], what were you thinking about in terms of how the world had changed?”, and Chrétien replied:

 

“… it is a division in the world that is building up. And I knew that it was the inspiration of it.  For me, I think that the rest of the world a bit too selfish, and that there is a lot of resentment…. You know, the poor, relatively, get poorer all the time. And the rich are getting richer all the time. … You know, you cannot exercise your powers to the point of humiliation for the others.  And that is what the Western world, not only the Americans, the Western world has to realize, because they are human beings too, and there are long-term consequences if you don’t look hard at the reality in 10 or 20 or 30 years from now.”

 

Although an Ipso-Reid poll found that 84 percent of Canadians believed the United States was at least partly responsible for the Sept. 11 attacks, and although Senator Douglas Roche commented;

 

“This was a very perceptive comment [Jean Chrétien’s]. It was waiting to be said–needed to be said. It was something that many of us have been saying for a long time. Any anti-terrorism policy has to be seen within the totality of economic and social conditions that are the obvious spawning ground of this desperate activity.”

 

There was an uproar, particular in the United States where people accused Chrétien of ‘making excuses for terrorists’ and in Canada, …

 

“Canadian Alliance leader Stephen Harper called on Chrétien to apologize to the U.S. and to the families of Canadians killed in the attacks. “(His) comments, particularly coming on the anniversary of Sept. 11, blaming the victim are shameful,” Harper charged. “What was behind the events of Sept. 11 are the forces of evil and hatred…. These must be resisted by free and democratic societies and their leaders.”

This split between the views of Jean Chrétien and Stephen Harper exemplifies the POLARIZING DIVISION in ‘AWARENESS’ that is manifest in CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL POLITICS that persists in WESTERN CULTURE GENERALLY. ARE WE NOT INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT STRANDS IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WEB OF LIFE as in indigenous aboriginal (AND MODERN PHYSICS) understanding and as also in Modern physics; “The world is given to me only once, not one existing and one perceived. Subject and object are only one. The barrier between them cannot be said to have broken down as a result of recent experience in the physical sciences, for this barrier does not exist.” …Erwin Schroedinger

 

“It is the face of our own shadow that glowers at us across the Iron Curtain.” – Carl Jung

As Jung points out, Primitive man (and he might have included indigenous aboriginals with their ‘mitakuye oyasin’ (everything is related) belief did FALL INTO THE WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTALIZATION SUPPORTED TRAP OF THE SELF-OTHER SPLIT;

 

To him (primitive man) the world is a more or less fluid phenomenon within the stream of his own fantasy, where subject and object are undifferentiated and in a state of mutual interpenetration.” – Carl Jung<‘mark>

 

BUT THE HARSH, BINARY VIEWPOINT of THE CONSERVATIVE as in Stephen Harper’s comment is VERY FAMILIAR TO ME, in the context of SIMPLE BINARY SCIENCE that Jung also pints his finger at because WESTERN CULTURE MAINSTREAM SCIENCE (Newtonian) FRAGMENTS THE REALITY CONTINUUM, SPLITTING APART FIGURE AND GROUND and giving us what we call THE OBJECTIVE VIEW in which WE ARE UNINVOLVED.  As Nietzsche points out, this FRAGMENTATION is SYNTHETIC being based on the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR that INVENTS “THE LOCAL AUTHOR”;

 

Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

 

With this WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING TECHNIQUE OF FRAGMENTATION, …. we no longer have to solve the PROBLEM of UNDERSTANDING an ALL-INCLUDING WORLD in which WE OURSELVES are included, but WE CAN PLAY THE GAME OF BEING VOYEURS of a DETACHED PSEUDO-REALITY where we become JUDGEMENTAL OBSERVERS of “WHAT THOSE INDEPENDENT OTHERS ARE DOING”.

 

This LINGUISTIC SYNTHETIC DETACHMENT has led us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS to develop a PURIFICATIONIST SYSTEM OF JUSTICE based on IDENTIFYING AND REMOVING/DISABLING the notional “LOCAL AUTHOR” of DISTURBANCE to the STATUS QUO (even if that “LOCAL AUTHOR” is the AUTHOR of REBALANCING in an UNBALANCED RICH and POOR social collective’ aka a ‘ROBIN HOOD’).

(more…)

How TRUMP and MUSK are TAKING WESTERN CULTURE LUNACY TO ITS UNNATURAL LIMIT

0

 

Western CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS have been shown to be troubled by DYSFUNCTION arising from TOO SIMPLE LANGUAGE and how this leads to FRAGMENTATION and OBCURANTISM in the WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHE which manifests in WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS.

 

-1- FRAGMENTATION, as Nietzsche and Bohm both show, derives from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which REDUCES our natural understanding of REALITY as TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational), and RECASTS REALITY in LOCAL and EXPLICIT TERMS.  Our SENSE EXPERIENCE informs us of our INCLUSION IN A TRANSFORMING WORLD, which DOES NOT LEND ITSELF TO LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING BASED ON THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT, as Nietzsche points out with his ‘LIGHTNING FLASHES’ example which REDUCES this “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT” phenomena (buildup of electromagnetic field based tensions) to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT “LIGHTNING FLASHES”.

 

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are AWARE, at some level in our psyche, that the REAL WORLD OF OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE is a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, as Heraclitus sussed out, and which indigenous aboriginals NOT ONLY SUSSED OUT but CAPTURED IN THEIR LANGUAGE DESIGN.  By building in a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE for acknowledging our inclusion in TRANSFORMATION that is NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT the indigenous aboriginal language THUS AVOIDS THE ERROR of WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING WHEREIN “LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORING” HIJACKS THE FOUNDATIONAL ROLE of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANFORMATION.  In the film ‘DANCES WITH WOLVES’ the indigneous aboriginal naming convention that suggests inclusion in ‘the transforming web-of-life’ is used, suggesting that our primary status is INCLUSION IN THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, whereas our WESTERN CULTURE ‘DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMAR gives us “JOHN DUNBAR” as an ‘INDEPENDENT BEING WITH HIS OWN POWERS LOCAL AUTHORING of EXPLICIT ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.

 

WESTERN CULTURE HABITUALLY EMPLOYS THE ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR to FRAGMENT the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM of our sense-experience (of inclusion therein).  The term ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ was applied by Nietzsche who pointed out the ARTIFICIALITY OF THE NOTION of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ which is CREATED by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, which is the source of FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE AND THOUGHT, which is PROBLEMATIC.

 

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” because, as indigenous aboriginals have NOT FORGOTTEN and as MODERN PHYSICS has affirmed, MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING, TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which is an ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS, constituting a BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM relationship wherein the CONDENSATION is “BOTH” ITSELF “AND” the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM IT IS INCLUDED IN.

 

NOTA BENE!  This BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM RELATION is a FUNDAMENTAL DEPARTURE in UNDERSTANDING REALITY, … FROM THE SIMPLE WESTERN CULTURE STANDARD BINARY EITHER/OR LOGICOF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM based UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY which we have BUILT IN TO OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME.  THIS BOTH/AND LOGIC IS THE DEPARTURE supported by Heraclitus that has been affirmed by Modern physics and which is the foundational belief in indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.  THIS LESS SIMPLE THAN BINARY LOGIC, (QUANTUM) BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM based UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY wherein TRANSFORMATION is FOUNDATIONAL, and wherein CONDENSATIONS are “APPEARANCES” that are continually FORMING and RE-FORMING (TRANSFORMING) within an ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (like WHORLINGS IN FLOWING where the WHORLINGS are part of the APPEARANCE of FLOWING and ARE NOT LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES).  This is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM relationship which is LESS SIMPLE than SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM wherein the WHORL is ‘spoken of’ and thus regarded as a LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF with ITS OWN POWER OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE DEVELOPED A KNEE-JERK HABIT OF USING LANGUAGE THAT IMPUTES LOCAL EXPLICIT “BEING” to WHORLINGS IN THE FLOWING that are APPEARANCE based NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FLOW PHENOMENA, which is without dependence on the abstraction of LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING.

 

(more…)

WHAT’S WRONG WITH TRUMP and WESTERN CULTURE POLITICS IN GENERAL?

0

The ANSWER, IN SHORT, IS  “WESTERN CULTURE BLINDNESS TO THE REALITY OF TRANSFORMATION” … and its SUBSTITUTION OF “LOCAL AUTHORING”.

EAST and WEST were ON THE SAME PAGE as far as Lao Tzu and Heraclitus were concerned; i.e. they both believed that EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX; i.e. that REALITY is a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (more recently termed a WAVE-FIELD),  and in this understanding, material forms are understood as APPEARANCES in the manner of WHORLINGS in FLOWING, and thus NOT PHYSICALLY having the BEING and the SHAPES and BOUNDARIES and MOVEMENTS that have been IMAGINED to come with the WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based ‘PACKAGE’ of OBSERVABLE FORMS that appear to be moving WITHIN an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.  BUT THERE IS NO SUCH EMPTY SPACE AND THERE ARE NO SUCH SEPARATE MATERIAL FORMS IN THAT NON-EXISTENT EMPTY SPACE; i.e. THERE IS NO SUCH BINARY LOGIC STRUCTURE, there is only TRANSFORMATION which manifests the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM as describes, for example, CONDENSATIONS in the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (wherein space is FULL, not EMPTY).  This  BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM describes the MODERN PHYSICS CONDENSATIONS OF THE PLENUM UNDERSTANDING OF REAILTY.  It also describes the STRANDS-IN-THE-WEB and CONDENSATIONS-of-the-PLENUM understandings of reailty.  The Indigenous aboriginal people have historically had this same sense of NATURE as ONE , wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) by virtue of being INCLUDED in an INTERCONNECTING and INTERDEPENDING manner, as with CONDENSATIONS in the PLENUM and as with STRANDS in a WEB.

(NOTA BENE: the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM is LESS SIMPLE than the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM yet it is COMMON in WESTERN CULTURE to MISTAKENLY employ simple BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM where what is required is less simple BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM.  

“Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.” —Chief Seattle

The understanding here is that we two-leggeds, the four-leggeds, the winged and crawling ones and all related (mitakuye oyasin means everything is related) as is affirmed by ourselves and all things being CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

WHAT THIS MEANS IS THAT “CHANGE” IS TRANSFORMATION OF THE OVERALL WEB.  IF A STRAND ‘DIES’, ALL STRANDS IN THE WEB ARE IMPACTED, INCLUDING OURSELVES, WHICH IS ANOTHER WAY OF SAYING THAT “THE ONLY REAL DYNAMIC IS TRANSFORMATION” BECAUSE OF THE INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT STRUCTURE OF STRANDS IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WEB AKA CONDENSATIONS IN THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

It is understood in indigenous aboriginal culture that‘everything is related’ (mitakuye oyasin)  which is why there is CARING for all forms of life including the old moss-covered rocks.

“An indigenous aboriginal worldview sees spirit in all living and non-living things, so that rocks, water, and soil all have spirit to them.  Water is considered to be sacred, not only for what it does for the human body and environment but because of this spirit.”

 

This following TWO PARAGRAPHS are of CRITICAL IMPORTANCE in pointing to the source of WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYSFUNCTION

THE WESTERN CULTURE PROBLEM WITH LANGUAGE: … The WESTERN CULTURE MISTAKEN use of SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM based LOCAL AUTHORING TO EXPLAIN ‘CHANGE’, … IN PLACE OF LESS SIMPLE (QUANTUM ) BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM based TRANSFORMATION, … OBSCURES THE REALITY OF OUR INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, and SUBSTITUTES THE MISTAKEN IMPRESSION OF INDEPENDENT BEINGS INTERACTING WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which leads to, among other ERRORS, THE OVER-SIMPLISTIC PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE of WESTERN CULTURE (the removal of BINARY LOGIC-defined “bad beings” while protecting and proliferating “good beings”) instead OF THE LESS SIMPLE BUT SENSE-EXPERIENCE GROUNDED RESTORATIVE JUSTICE OF INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS AND ADVAITA VEDANTA which comprehends that EVERYTHING IS RELATED and THERE ARE NO “INDEPENDENT BEINGS” and thus THERE ARE NO “LOCAL AUTHORIS”.  RESTORATIVE JUSTICE acknowledges that EVERYTHING IS RELATED and that we are all CONDENSATIONS of the ONE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED TRANSFORMING PLENUM  (as with the BOTH/AND relationship of “STRANDS IN A WEB”) consistent with Modern physics, while WESTERN CULTURE PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE is MISTAKENLY BASED on INDEPENDENT ‘BEING’ based entities who are notionally DISCONNECTED and isolated from one another by a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE. …….. The UNDERSTANDING here is that WE ARE INCLUDED IN THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM WHEREIN EVERYTHING IS INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT (as with STRANDS IN A WEB) AND IT IS ONLY WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSTRUCTIONS that MISTAKENLY SPLIT US APART (in our psyche ONLY) INTO “INDEPENDENT BEINGS” and “INDEPENDENT NATIONS”, thus having a PROFOUND SHAPING INFLUENCE on our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC due to our elevating of the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING in terms of NAMING-instantiated INDEPENDENT BEING that is being used to construct an ABSTRACT PSEUDO-REALITY that has been ADOPTED by WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS as their/our OPERATIVE REALITY, which is the SOURCE of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.  Bohm has spoken of this WESTERN CULTURE PROBLEM of infusing FRAGMENTATION into our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, as follows;

THE RESULTANT WESTERN CULTURE AFFLICTION of BINARY LOGIC based FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

 

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

 

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.

 

HOW ABOUT US “HUMANS” which In Modern physics, as also in indigenous aboriginal languistic conceptualizing, are described as “HUMANINGS” that are FEATURES in the all-including TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM and NOT “INDEPENDENT BEINGS” with “OUR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING” in which case we are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as is the nature of FEATURES within the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM, meaning that WE ARE NOT LOCAL and EXPLICIT as in the BINARY LOGIC based WESTERN CULTURE VIEW.

In a FLOW-BASED WORLD, the WHORLINGS IN THE FLOWING”APPEAR” LOCAL and EXPLICIT (i.e. we describe WHAT WE SAY are THEIR SHAPES and THEIR MOVEMENTS but the reality is that THE DIFFERENT FORMS we are looking at and describing ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM or TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM.

APPEARANCES CAN GET THE BEST OF US, particularly if we INCORRECTLY ENCODE THEM INTO LANGUAGE WHERE WE KEEP REPEATING THE SAME ERRORS TO OURSELVES OVER AND OVER AGAIN.  In this regard, WESTERN CULTURE HAS BUILT INTO ITS LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, that there is a polethora of independent beings running around and interacting with one another WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE?  SHOULD WE BELIEVE IT?

 

NO! NO! NO!   We are INCLUSIONS (CONDENSATIONS) WITHIN A TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka THE WAVE-FIELD.  THE ONLY “REAL” DYNAMIC IS THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION.  THERE IS NO “MOVEMENT OF THINGS”.  THAT IS NO MORE THAN A DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR AS NIETZSCHE SAYS.

THINK “TRANSFORMATION” IN ALL SITUATIONS AND WITH ALL PHENOMENA.  WHEN WE START THINKING IN TERMS OF “THE MOVEMENT OF NAMED THINGS” AND/OR “THE CHANGES TO NAMED THINGS” AND/OR “THE INTERACTIONS OF NAMED THINGS”, .. BACK UP AND INSTEAD SEEK UNDERSTANDING IN TERMS OF TRANSFORMATION, NOT “OF WHAT”, JUST “TRANSFORMATION” BY WAY OF “CHANGING RELATIONS” WITHOUT OPENING THE DOOR TO ‘THINGS-THAT-BE”. RECALL THAT WHORLINGS IN FLOWING CONCERNS SHAPES THAT ARE APPEARANCES and therefore “THEY DO NOT MOVE” because there is no “THEY” and “THEY DO NOT CHANGE” beause there is no “THEY”, and “THEY DO NOT INTERACT” because there is no “THEY”.   (WE NEED A VERB-BASED LANGUAGE WHICH ACKNOWLEDGES THAT EVERY”THING” IS IN FLUX AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THERE ARE ONLY “RELATIONS” as is the meaning of “MITAKUYE OYASIN”.

 

The NEXT TIME WE CATCH OURSELVES PUTTING TOGETHER LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS WHEREIN “THINGS ARE MOVING AND INTERACTING” .. STOP!  RECALL THAT THERE IS NO RETURN PATH because EXPRESSING THINGS IN BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC, AS IS IMPLIED WHERE THINGS ARE MOVING AND INTERACTING,  REQUIRES THE DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE  aka THE BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM. The INCLUDING MEDIUM is what ties everything together as in the case of CONDENSATIONS of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which are INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT.

BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC based PSUEDO-REALITY IS NOT (SENSE-AFFIRMABLE) REALITY!  SENSE-AFFIRMABLE REALITY IS TRANSFORMATION wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM. THIS “DEMANDS” “the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM”.  ONCE BINARY LOGIC IS INVOKED, ITS A CASE OF; …. “TOTO, I HAVE A FEELING WE’RE NOT IN KANSAS ANY MORE!”.  That is, the BINARY LOGIC based FRAGMENTING OF THE PLENUM INTO SEPARATE PARTS WITH THEIR OWN MOVEMENTS, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION TAKES US OUT OF TRANSFORMING REALITY, PUTTING US INTO A STATIC PSEUDO-REALITY WHEREIN TRANSFORMING IS SUSPENDED WHILE FRAGMENTATION (into one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING) and OBSCURANTISM (by dropping out the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING)… TAKE OVER. 

 * * * * * * * * BEGIN CONVEYING THE ESSENTIAL FINDING IN THIS PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION * * * * * *

NOTA BENE: the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM is the less simple  (that BINARY EITHER/OR) LOGIC is needed to convey in LANGUAGE the STRUCTURE of our universe as undestood through our SENSE-EXPERIENCE.  The LESS SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED medium DROPS OUT the female accommodating/enabling conjugate, thus REDUCING our incorporating into our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM (wherein the medium is the energy-charged plenum within which there are condensations), and this SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC pseudo-reality is has become the WESTERN CULTURE mainstream standard for linguistic conceptualiziations. The POPULARIZING of BINARY LOGIC is the source of the DROPPING OUT of the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in LANGUAGE of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and ERRONEOUSLY ELEVATING the BINARY LOGIC based LOCAL and EXPLICIT to an UNNATURAL PRECEDENCE over the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as made possible by the SUBSTITUTING of ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, reducing our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS from their FLUID (NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) basis, to a MECHANISTIC LOCAL and EXPLICIT basis.  Instead of the FLUID ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, which incorporates both the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) TOGETHER WITH THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT (THE GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING TOWN), we THROW OUT the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and substitute ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE as the new CONTAINER for the LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘TOWN THAT IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’.  In other words, we REDUCE the ANDROGYNOUS (WAVE-FIELD based) “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” to the one -sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING”  which is now LOCAL and EXPLICIT, blinding us to TRANSFORMATION “

 * * * * * * * * END OF CONVEYING THE ESSENTIAL FINDING IN THIS PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION * * * * * *

This is what Schroedinger is intending when speaking of material forms as Schaumkommen (APPEARANCE).  He is saying that we are living in a FLUID REALITY as Heraclitus contended where WHAT APPEARS to be LOCAL and EXPLICIT is, instead, NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.   This is the case with FLOW and the APPEARANCE of FLOW where there are, for example, WHORLINGS IN THE FLOWING, … where the moment we refer to them using our WESTERN CULTURE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR based LANGUAGE, we are hatching a BASTARDIZED PSEUDO-REALITY wherein we are DUMBING DOWN our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY from “TRANSFORMATION” wherein everything is in flux (meaning THERE ARE NO THINGS, only FLOW-FORMS), … to A MECHANISTIC PSEUDO-REALITY.

 

WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON IS OVERALL, ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION wherein WHAT LOOKS LIKE SOLID FORMS IS “APPEARANCE”, “SCHAUMKOMMEN” that we can compare to WHORLINGS in FLOWING where it is OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that RE-CASTS these WHORLINGS in the FLOWING wherein the overall reality is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (= a WAVE-FIELD) as LOCAL, EXPLICIT “WHORLS” (thanks to BEING based NAMING) notionally WITH THEIR OWN POWER of AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTG) so that we make it appear as if WHORLS are the AUTHORS OF WHORLING and thus we INVENT LOCAL AUTHORING.  Where have we heard this before?. 

 

 

Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

 

 

OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE INFORMS US THAT WE SHARE INCLUSION IN THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, … SO THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING IS WRONG (it is a DOUBLE ERROR BASED ABSTRACTION), but such REDUCTION of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT is characteristic of WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING because of our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and “GOING WITH” the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE AS IF IT EXISTED “ON ITS OWN”.

 

TRANSFORMATION IS THE TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD WHICH IS EVERYWHERE AT THE SAME TIME.  I.E. TRANSFORMATION is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT but the FORMS that develop within THE TRANSFORMING are TREATED OF in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE as if they were LOCAL, EXPLICIT, MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES which THEY ARE NOT!   TRANSFORMATION MAY MANIFEST AS WHORLINGS IN FLOWING.  THE WHORLINGS ARE ‘APPEARANCE’ AND WE CANNOT CATCH THEM IN A BUCKET AND PULL THEM OUT AND PUT THEM IN SEPARATE STORAGE because the WHORLINGS are ONLY APPEARANCE which is how TRANSFORMATION MANIFESTS WITHIN A FLOW FIELD.

(more…)

Shifting our THINKING from BINARY LOGIC to QUANTUM LOGIC 

0

ABSTRACT: 

Our sense-experience based understanding is that we are included in a matrix of interconnections and interdependencies as with ‘strands in the web’. The relational dynamics in this case are QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM based.  But, in WESTERN CULTURE, there has evolved a BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which portrays people as INDEPENDENT BEINGS notionally WITH THEIR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, opening the way to abstract concepts such as THE TERRORIST which TOTALLY OBSCURES, in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZINGS, the actual, sense-experience affirmed reality of our INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE .  IN BINARY LOGIC THINKING, the designation of TERRORIST RECASTS the REAL PROBLEM of RELATIONAL DISSONANCE IN THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, in the SIMPLE BUT FALSE BINARY LOGIC based EITHER/OR  terms of THE GUILTY and INNOCENT’, FALSELY implying that the STRAND IN THE WEB that becomes a CONDUIT for the VIOLENT EXPRESSION of TENSIONS in the SOCIAL RELATIONAL WEB, is a LOCAL, INDEPENDENT SOURCE of VIOLENCE, A FALSE CONCEPT that which WALLPAPERS OVER and RENDERS INVISIBLE the ACTUAL REALITY of the “TOXIC ENVIRONMENT” (TOXICITY in the form of DISSONANCE IN THE SOCIAL RELATIONAL MATRIX).

ingAs we know from our sense experience, there are TOXIC SOCIAL ENVIRONMENTS that manifest through “MINER’S CANARIES” whose violent behaviour stems from the TOXICITY of the SOCIAL RELATIONAL MATRIX they share INCLUSION IN.  WESTERN CULTURE, by using SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC, describes the WILD STRAND-IN-THE-WEB as an INDEPENDENT BEING wose actions are FULLY and SOLELY LOCALLY AUTHORED, which MAKES NO SENSE as far as SENSE-EXPRIENCE GOES, but is an INTELLECTUAL BINARY LOGIC based SIMPLIFICATION that is common to WESTERN CULTURE, a CULTURE for whom the notion of DISSONANCE in the relational social matrix that elicits the remedy of HEALING CIRCLES as in indigenous aboriginal cultures, IS TOTALLY FOREIGN.

THE LABEL of TERRORIST is at the same time, a CERTIFICATE of EXONERATION of all other QUOTE/UNQUOTE “INDEPENDENT BEINGS” in the COMMUNITY .  It is a CERTIFICATE of EXEPTION from the QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY of INCLUSION IN TOXIC WESTERN CULTURE ENVIRONMENTS wherein the “TERRORIST” is the WESTERN CULTURE NAME for the “MINER’S CANARY” which “LETS ORDINARY CITIZENS OFF THE HOOK”, which is NOT THE WORST RESULT of this ERROR.  The more PROBLEMATIC RESULT is that ALL EFFORTS TO RESOLVE THE PROBLEM TURN THEIR BACK ON THE TOXIC ENVIRONMENT, leaving it to continue to fester, while focusing remedial actions  on the EARLY DETECTION OF TERRORISTS (the MINER’S CANARIES) even as the FREQUENCY OF “TERRORIST INCIDENTS” contues to rise due to the the lack of addressing the REAL ISSUE which is the TOXICITY of the ENVIRONMENT.  

 * * * 

 

WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING has gone GLOBAL and with it, the HABIT of reducing our CONCEPTUALIZING from its less simple QUANTUM LOGIC  ‘fluid’ STRUCTURE  that captures continuing FLUID transformation, as in “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” , to the simpler BINARY LOGIC ‘material being’ STRUCTURE  which FRAGMENTS the continuum and presents things in a PARTS-WISE fashion, as in “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods” .  WE can ‘SEE’ in the QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD structure wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING (RECEPTOR) is given by the words “in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”  while the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING (EFFECTOR) is given by “THERE IS TOWNING” .  WESTERN CULTURE has adopted A SIMPLIFIED MODE OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING WHEREIN THE FEMALE RECEPTOR, which conveys NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “CONTEXT”  (i.e. the RECEPTOR as given by “in the transforming landscape”) is DROPPED OUT, leaving ON ITS OWN, LOCAL and EXPLICIT “CONTENT” (i.e. the EFFECTOR as given by “There is towning”).   WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, by ‘DROPPING OUT ‘ the RECEPTOR, leaves the EFFECTOR “FLOATING IN EMPTY SPACE” in which case the ANDROGYNOUS dynamic of TRANSFORMATION is OBSCURED as we FORMULATE our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING in the ONE-SIDED TERMS of EFFECTOR-driven actions and development. THIS “DROPPING OUT” of the RECEPTOR (termed the DEA ABSCONDITA or GODDESS in HIDING) manifests in what Nietzsche calls the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which supports one-sided EFFECTOR-based dynamics as if within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, while obscuring the ‘full wave-field’ dynamic of the TRANSFORMING relational continuum.  This WESTERN CULTURE DROPPING OUT of the RECEPTOR in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is, as Bohm and Schroedinger point out, the SOURCE of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING which is DIVISIVE since a minority continue to acknowledge the REALITY of the RECEPTOR in spite of our WESTERN CULTURE practice of LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM.

RECEPTOR WITH EFFECTOR: “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.   (THE QUANTUM LOGIC of MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta).  Here, the EFFECTOR (local and explicit) is the CONDENSATION of-and-within the RECEPTOR (nonlocal end implicit) where the RECEPTOR is the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD, the resulting CONIUNCTIO OPPOSITORUM constitutes TRANSFORMATION.

EFFECTOR WITHOUT RECEPTOR: “The TOWN is growing, developing and producing goods”.  (THE BINARY LOGIC that prevails in WESTERN CULTURE).  Here the EFFECTOR (local and explicit) is imagined as if operating in ABSOLUTE EMPTY, INFINITE SPACE thanks to the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which portrays the EFFECTOR as the LOCAL AUTHOR of actions and development.  The MISSING RECEPTOR (the energy-charged PLENUM) that WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING DROPS OUT, is alluded to as the DEA ABSCONDITA (GODDESS IN HIDING), which is the DROPOUT that comes with BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM aka EXCLUDED RECEPTOR.

BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC AS DIFFERENTIATING OPERATOR:   BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC serves as a DIFFERENTIATING OPERATOR that SELECTIVELY HIGHLIGHTS the CONDENSATION, ISOLATING AND PROMOTING THE CONDENSATION TO NOTIONAL PRIMARY STATUS by SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE in place of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD in which THERE IS ONLY THE “APPEARANCE” of “INDEPENDENCE”.  The MISSING PLENUM (DEA ABSCONDITA) which is the FOUNDATIONAL, ACTIVE TRANSFORMING MEDIUM within which the CONDENSATION is “APPEARANCE” (in the manner of a WHORLING in FLOWING), which Schroedinger terms ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ is FALSELY promoted and presented in ABSOLUTE BEING-within-EMPTY SPACE STATUS. This SLEIGHT OF HAND LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that SELECTS OUT the CONDENSATION by the “DOUBLE ERROR” of NAMING and GRAMMAR (Nietzsche) thus bestows on this FLOW-FEATURE, PRIMARY AUTHORING AGENT STATUS.  This SUBSTITUTING of BEING based MECHANICS for WAVE-FIELD based TRANSFORMATION in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, while a radical departure from the FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, now serves as the POPULAR WESTERN CULTURE “OPERATIVE REALITY” and is the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

 

 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

 

 

This note explains the SPLIT in WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS with some people SUPPORTING Luigi Mangione (who shot and killed United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson), while MOST DO NOT.  I am inserting the QUALIFIER of WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS because it is WESTERN CULTURE where BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING (which is involved in this case) is commonly used even though BINARY LOGIC is a “BEING”-BASED SIMPLIFYING LOGIC used in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that DROPS out essential meaning that can be captured in the LESS SIMPLE FLOW-BASED QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is employed in MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, all of which AVOID the “too simple” BINARY LOGIC in their LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  Examples of each are as follows;

 

QUANTUM LOGIC (all-including flow-based) is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein EVERYTHING IS IN RELATIONAL FLUX (TRANSFORMATION) as in ‘There is TOWNING in conjugate relation with the SHRINKING WILDERNESS in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.  This is the MODERN PHYSICS understanding where everything is in flux and THERE IS NO DEPENDENCE ON “BEING”.  In the language of Modern physics (and indigenous aboriginals) one would say the equivalent of THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE where the TOWNING is “BOTH” the TOWNING (which is like a whorling in the flowing) “AND” at the same time, the FLOWING it is included in.  The TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, like the WHORLING in the FLOWING is “BOTH” the dynamic form itself “AND” the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  So, in both cases the relationship is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.  The INCLUDING MEDIUM is the ‘FLOWING’ or the ‘TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ while the TOWNING or the WHORLING are the ‘APPEARANCE’’; i.e. the TOWNING is APPEARANCE associated with the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and the WHORLING is APPEARANCE associated with the FLOWING.  In Schroedinger’s words

 

What we observe as material bodies and forces are nothing but shapes and variations in the structure of space. Particles are just schaumkommen (appearances)”

 

In indigenous aboriginal LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING as also in MODERN PHYSICS, we would say things in flow-based languages which would be equivalent to “there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” or “there is WHORLING in the FLOWING” where EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX and we convey the QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where THE WHORLING “IS THE APPEARANCE” of THE FLOWING and where THE TOWNING “IS THE APPEARANCE” of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  THIS RELATIONSHIP WHEREIN ALL FORMS ARE FEATURES WITHIN THE FLOW IS THE QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC RELATION.

 

     BINARY LOGIC (beings-in-empty-space based) is the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM which DIFFERS RADICALLY FROM QUANTUM LOGIC .  BINARY LOGIC relations would be the case if we MIS-INTERPRETED the QUANTUM LOGIC phenomena by imputing INDEPENDENT BEING to the TOWN and to the WHORL and using what Nietzsche calls the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which implies LOCAL AUTHORING by saying “THE TOWN IS GROWING” and ‘the WHORL IS GROWING”.  THESE ASSOCIATIONS TAKE US INTO THE “BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION WORLD” WHERE WE LOSE A LOT OF REAL, SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE UNDERSTANDING, INCLUDING THE FACT THAT ‘EVERYTHING IS RELATED’ (MITAKUYE OYASIN).  These DROP-OUTS in passing from QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION include the loss of the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of CONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE OF ALL MATERIAL FORMS as in the BOTH/AND (quantum logic) CONDENSATIONS and WAVE-FIELD relation SYMBOLIZED in indigenous aboriginal cultures by the BOTH/AND (quantum logic) STRANDS and WEB RELATION

 

NOTE THAT THIS LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING DOUBLE ERROR PLOY IS THE SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM which COMES WITH DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMAR based LOCAL AUTHORING; e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ is an example of FRAGMENTATION since we have artificially, with the first error of NAMING, SPLIT THE TOWNING OUT OF THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, GIVING IT LOCAL, INDEPENDENT ‘BEING’ as ‘THE TOWN’, and with the second error of GRAMMAR, IMPUTING TO THE NEWLY-CREATED BEING, “ITS OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS”, at least as far our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS are concerned.

  (more…)

Understanding “Why” the Popular Support for Killer Luigi Mangione

0

ABSTRACT: It APPEARS as if something is playing out in our WESTERN CULTURE social collectives, akin to the “MINER’S CANARY” effect.  THAT IS, WESTERN CULTURE’s LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme has DROPPED OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate and is GOING WITH ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate.   Consider what happens when a LESS SENSITIVE PERSON observes a MORE SENSITIVE PERSON as in the analogy of the MINER’S CANARY.  What the less sensitive observer will see is what looks like a CRAZY bird that keeps banging into the ceiling which ‘looks crazy’ because the less sensitive observer is NOT SENSING the rising TOXICITY in the environment  (e.g. as if in a room that is filling from the floor upwards towards the ceiling, with toxic invisible odorless gas).  What the less sensitive observer sees is a bird that has GONE CRAZY.  COULD THIS BE HAPPENING IN MODERN WESTERN CULTURE.  There is a clue to support that this is the case, in that a sizeable fraction of the populace is in EMPATHY with seemingly ‘out of the blue’ ASSASSINS or would-be ASSASSINS such as LUIGI MANGIONE and THOMAS MATTHEW CROOKS (a would-be assassin who shot at and grazed TRUMP).

If we ‘had it in our heads’ that we lived in a gas-filled environment which seemed steady and unchanging to us LESS SENSITIVE OCCUPANTS but was rightly understood as INCREASINGLY TOXIC by the MORE SENSITIVE (or those more exposed to the rising toxicity) then the erratic behaviour of the MORE SENSITIVE would be seen as ABERRANT BEHAVIOUR by the LESS SENSITIVE who were NOT AWARE OF THE ACTUAL RISING TOXICITY IN THE ENVIRONMENT.  IF LUIGI MANGIONE, THOMAS MATTHEW CROOKS and the rising number of other ASSASSINS, were in some form or fashion, MORE SENSITIVE to rising TOXICITY in our SOCIETY, their violent actions could be understood as attempts to combat the RISING TOXICITY.  But as in the story of the Miner’s Canary, most of us lack the sensitivity to PERCEIVE THE RISING TOXICITY in which case we interpret the VIOLENT RESPONSES OF THOSE THAT DO, to THEIR BEING INSANE.

CLUES that this may be the case in TODAY’S WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES are that there are many people who are SENSING the RISING TOXICITY that COME OUT OF THE WOODWORK and SHOW THEMSELVES, in support of a person that throws themself OVERTLY in a BODY and SOUL committing manner, into a COUNTERATTACK against the RISING TOXICITY; e.g. Luigi Mangione.

LET’S NOT FORGET that in the indigenous aboriginal culture, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita, there is the understanding that ‘everything is related’ in which case THERE ARE NO ‘BEINGS’ to classify as EITHER good OR bad, as is also the understanding in the QUANTUM LOGIC of Modern physics, in which case there is no equivalent to the PURIFICATIONISM of WESTERN CULTURE where, instead of understanding STRIFE as IMBALANCE for which the remedy is the RESTORING OF BALANCE, the REMEDY for STRIFE is the purificationist ELIMINATING of the BAD ‘BEINGS’.  This is leading to problems generally in the WESTERN CULTURE and particularly in the U.S. where there have been a large number of “MASS SHOOTINGS”.   In Cultures where the understanding is that ‘everyone is related” (mitakuye oyasin), the VIOLENCE is understood as relational dissonance impacting STRANDS IN THE WEB wherein EVERYONE IS INVOLVED in which case RESTORATIVE JUSTICE is aimed are resolving relational dissonance and restoring relational resonance among STRANDS in the WEB. In the mental model of STRANDS IN A WEB, when VIOLENCE ERUPTS, as in a relational WEB, the STRANDS that become casualities are not seen as succumbing within a BINARY LOGIC PERPETRATOR VICTIM context; i.e. indigenous aboriginal justice orients to the restoring of balance and harmony among the STRANDS in the WEB rather that to the ELIMINATING OF ‘GUILTY BEINGS’ as in WESTERN CULTURE justice which is HUMAN “BEING” based where the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR informs us in DOUBLE ERROR (NAMING AND GRAMMAR) terms of the LOCAL AUTHORING or VIOLENCE and KILLING.  

SO, because indigenous aboriginals (and Modern physics) see people in the manner of STRANDS IN THE WEB  (or CONDENSATIONS IN THE PLENUM) wherein EVERYTHING is related, outbreaks of VIOLENCE are understood as being of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) instead of LOCAL and EXPLICIT origin, hence JUSTICE is RESTORATIVE as facilitated by the HEALING CIRCLE where the community comes togather to recultivate harmony and balance among the STRANDS-IN-THE-WEB.  This is consistent with the understanding of mitakuye oyasin (everything is related as with strands in a web) and it is consistent with Modern physics wherein material forms are condensations of the all-including energy-charged PLENUM aka wave-field.   THERE ARE NO SUCH THINGS as INDEPENDENT BEINGS, and thus no IDENTIFICATION of GOOD INDEPENDENT BEINGS and BAD INDEPENDENT BEINGS; i.e. where VIOLENCE/STRIFE erupts in the indigenous aboriginal STRANDS IN THE WEB based community, while incurably problematic STRANDS may be removed, that is the exception.  There is nothing comparable to the WESTERN CULTURE PURIFICATIONIST PUNISHING AND PURGING OF THE BAD BEINGS and REWARDING AND RETAINING of the GOOD BEINGS.  

While WESTERN CULTURE PIONEERS ADMIRED THE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY APPROACH, the WESTERN CULTURE BELIEF IN ‘INDEPENDENT BEINGS’ was in BASIC CONTRADICTION to the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL ‘INTERRELATED and INTERDEPENDENT STRANDS-IN-THE-WEB BELIEF.

 

“To Engels, Morgan’s description of the Iroquois [In Lewis Henry Morgan’s Ancient Society and The League of the Haudenosaunee or Iroquois] was important because “it gives us the opportunity of studying the organization of a society which, as yet, knows no state.”  Jefferson had also been interested in the Iroquois’ ability to maintain social concensus without a large state apparatus, as had Franklin.  Engels described the Iroquoian state in much the same way that American revolutionaries had a century earlier: “Everything runs smoothly without soldiers, gendarmes, or police, without nobles, kings, governors, prefects or judges; without prisons, without trials.  All quarrels and disputes are settled by the whole body of those concerned. . . . The household is run communistically by a number of families; the land is tribal property, only the small gerdens being temporarily assigned to the households — still, not a bit of our extensive and complicated machinery of administration is required. . . . There are no poor and needy.  The communistic household and the gens know their responsibility  towards the aged, the sick and the disabled in war.  All are free and equal — including the women.” — Bruce E. Johansen, Forgotten Founders.

 

THE SENSITIVITY TO INVISIBLE TOXICITY in the ENVIRONMENT INVOKES LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where there can be substance that is BOTH itself AND the energy-charged PLENUM it is included in.  This requires language that goes BEYOND BINARY LOGIC.  BINARY LOGIC can handle the difference between EITHER material bodies OR empty space, but TOXINS bring into play the LOGIC of the INCLUDING THIRD aka QUANTUM LOGIC.  With BINARY LOGIC, we ask only whether the behaviour of the CANARY is NORMAL or ABNORMAL and there is no ‘complicating inquiry’ (not in our BINARY LOGIC user culture) that opens the door to the possibility that there is a CONTAINING AMBIANCE (such as the WAVE-FIELD) i.e. an INFLUENTIAL HABITAT instead of the EMPTY SPACE, that could change the behaviour of the INHABITANT so that in our inquiry into the behaviour of the INHABITANT, we could not limit our inquiry to THE INHABITANT by itself but would have to expand it to include the INFLUENCE OF THE HABITAT on the INHABITANT and the COMBINATION of the TWO.  This requires an investigative logic that goes beyond BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM to QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM which opens our consideration to the possibility of AMBIENT INFLUENCES on CONTENT behaviour.

WE KNOW THAT WE HAVE TO GO BEYOND ANALYZING THE INDIVIDUAL FOR AN EXPLANATION OF THEIR BEHAVIOUR in the case of the combination of A SENSITIVE INDIVIDUAL and a TOXIC ENVIRONMENT SO IT WOULD BE FOLLY TO, IN GENERAL, LIMIT OUR INVESTIGATION OF THE BEHAVIOUR OF THE CRAZY ACTING INDIVIDUAL, TO THE INDIVIDUAL, because we would then be OVERLOOKING the POSSIBILITY that THE ENVIRONMENT (SOCIAL AMBIANCE or CHEMICAL AMBIANCE) is SOURCING or HELPING TO SOURCE THE INHABITANT BEHAVIOUR.

AUTHOR’S REAL-TIME INTERJECTION: As I write this, the reader may see that I am having trouble with LANGUAGE as to how to handle the AMBIGUITY associated with that part of the dynamic that belongs to the INHABITANT and that part of the dynamic that belongs to the HABITAT in which case I would suggest that there is NEED for a language that HAS NO DEPENDENCY ON ‘BEING’ in which case we would be better off, as Bohm has said, with a FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE (e.g. Bohm’s Rheomode or an indigneous aboriginal flow-based langage) whereby we dould AVOID the use of BEING and the complications it brings by way of constraining our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to BINARY LOGIC based SPLITTING APART “INHABITANT” and “HABITAT”. 

Just as it makes sense to speak in the fluid terms of “THE TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, it makes sense, as well, to speak in the fluid terms of “the INHABITINGS IN THE TRANSFORMING HABITAT” where the operative relationship is the BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM, where the INHABITANT or MATERIAL FORM is understood as a CONDENSATION of the HABITAT or ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD).   This is NOT ONLY AN ADMISSION THAT THE LANGUAGE I/WE ARE USING, which is a BEING-based and thus BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE, is TOO SIMPLE and UNABLE TO DEAL WITH the QUANTUM LOGIC REALITIES that characterize our REAL LIFE EXPERIENCE.  OK, it was ME that for reasons of LINGUISTIC expedience, employed the term TOXIC ENVIRONMENT (TOXIC HABITAT) to try to explain changed behaviour in the INHABITANT, however, this difficulty in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING derives from the imposing of the ABSTRACT CONCEPT OF “BEING” as applied not only to INHABITANT but also to HABITAT, unlike indigenous aboriginal languages where one can speak in terms of HUMANINGS in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD where the HUMANINGS are “BOTH” themselves “AND” the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM they share inclusion in.  OK, I will close this note without being able to resolve this issue, which is the NEED for a FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which avoids THE ABSTRACTION OF “BEING”; e.g. “THERE IS TOWNING AND HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” (wherein everything is in flux).   Ok, that’s what the writer NEEDS but its WHAT THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE CHOOSES FOR THE COMMON LANGUAGE that establishes the COMMON GROUND (and how logically ‘complete’ that COMMON GROUND is going to be; i.e. BEING based COMMON GROUND is LIMITING while FLOW-BASED COMMON GROUND makes widespread communication possible, and what has been CHOSEN currently, and which REMAINS THE COMMON LANGUAGE is language that gives a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO ‘BEING’ which GROUNDS THE LANGUAGE in SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC, which is what is making the writing of this note DIFFICULT.

SIGNS of a TOXIC ENVIRONMENT would be where many SENSITIVE people are SECOND GUESSING what the SYSTEM is BLAMING ON THE BEHAVIOUR OF THE MALE ASSERTING INDIVIDUAL that they know from their own SENSE-EXPERIENCE, is being INDUCED by a TOXIC ENVIRONMENT. IN QUANTUM LOGIC, a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING cannot be separated from its FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate (they are two sides of the same concept).  Vygotsky in his study of THOUGHT and LANGUAGE affirms that the SCIENTIFIC (local and explicit) and SPONTANEOUS (nonlocal and implicit) are two sides of one CONCEPT; “Though fundamentally different in nature, the development of scientific and spontaneous concepts represent two sides of the same concept formation.”   

ALL OF THE EVIDENCE SUPPORTS the NON-EXISTENCE of LOCAL BEING-based AUTHORING (it is abstraction as in the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR), in which case, blaming VIOLENCE on a “LOCAL AUTHOR”, whether the VIOLENCE of the CEO or the VIOLENCE of his KILLER is misplaced.

* * *

Understanding “HOW” the Popular Support for Killer Luigi Mangione can be explained by common sensitive awareness to rising TOXICITY in the social NORM.

“What we call ‘normal’ (in WESTERN CULTURE), is a product of repression, denial, splitting, projection, introjection and other forms of destructive action on experience” — R.D. Laing

 * * * * * * * * 

 

(more…)

How we get FOOLED by the Cuckoo’s Egg of BINARY LOGIC

0

How we get FOOLED by the Cuckoo’s Egg of BINARY LOGIC

WE NEED QUANTUM LOGIC!

QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC

QUANTUM LOGIC is where we say “There is HUMANING in the transforming continuum” (where everything is in flux and humanings are included flow-features)

BINARY LOGIC is where we say “Yesterday, I saw three HUMANS walking down the street” (where Humans are BEING based CONTENT situated in a separate CONTAINER).

QUANTUM LOGIC is “BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM” where “HUMANINGS are BOTH FEATURES in the FLOWING MEDIUM like WHORLINGS in FLOWING, and, are at the same time, the FLOWING MEDIUM”

* * *

BINARY LOGIC is “EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM” where “HUMANS” are INDEPENDENT beings in empty space that we know by their material components.

“Now, what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else. You can only form the minds of reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of any service to them.  This is the principle on which I bring up my own children, and this is the principle on which I bring up these children.  Stick to the Facts, sir!”

‘Bitzer,’ said Thomas Gradgrind.  ‘Your definition of a horse.’

‘Quadruped. Graminivorous. Forty teeth, namely twenty-four grinders, four eye-teeth, and twelve incisive. Sheds coat in the spring; in marshy countries, sheds hoofs, too. Hoofs hard, but requiring to be shod with iron. Age known by marks in mouth.’ Thus (and much more) Bitzer.

— Charles Dickens, ‘Hard Times’

QUANTUM LOGIC is relational and WITHOUT DEPENDENCY ON ‘THINGS’, and we use it to come to understand things PURELY by way of relations.  Geoffrey Chew is a QUANTUM PHYSICS researcher and he describes ‘bootstrapping’ (building understanding up solely from relations), like this.

[Geoffrey Chew]: “when you formulate a question, you have to have some basic concepts that you are accepting in order to formulate the question.  But in the bootstrap approach, where the whole system represents a network of relationships without any firm foundation, the description of subject can be begun at a great variety of different places.  There isn’t any clear starting point.  And the way our theory has developed in the last few years, we quite typically don’t know what questions to ask.  We use consistency as the guide, and each increase in the consistency suggests something that is incomplete, but it rarely takes the form of a well-defined question.  We are going beyond the whole question-and-answer framework’.

BINARY LOGIC IS USED TO UNDERSTAND THINGS IN TERMS OF INDEPENDENT “MATERIAL BEINGS” EXPLAINABLE BY THEIR LOCAL, EXPLICIT COMPONENTS.

QUANTUM LOGIC IS USED TO UNDERSTAND THINGS PURELY IN TERMS OF RELATIONS WITHOUT ANY FOUNDATIONAL DEPENDENCY ON “BEING”

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES ARE QUANTUM LOGIC BASED (RELATIONS BASED); e.g. “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”. (or, “THERE IS HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM”

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES ARE BINARY LOGIC BASED (BEING BASED); e.g. “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING GOODS”, (or, “THE HUMAN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING GOODS”

* * * * * *

We can see from this comparison that WHILE WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES BUILD IN DEPENDENCY ON ‘BEING’ (“THINGS THAT ARE SAID TO MATERIALLY EXIST”) and “WHAT THINGS DO”, indigenous aboriginal languages are RELATIONAL and without dependency on the ABSTRACTION of NAMING-INSTANTIATED “BEING” (e.g. instead using relational inference such as ‘dances with wolves’).

(more…)

501 WORDS that explain how WE ARE ON A BUSTRIP TO HELL

0

 

 

The REALITY is that the indigenous aboriginals are right, we are strands in an interconnecting, interdependent WEB-OF-LIFE which means that RESTORATIVE JUSTICE is right because the person locally manifesting violent or destructive behaviour is NOT the AUTHOR of such violent VENTING but the strand-in-the-web-CONDUIT that is a CHANNEL for discharging what has been building in the relational web.  Because there is no LOCAL AUTHOR of violent actions, indigenous aboriginal Justice is Restorative.

 

The Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam all share BINARY LOGIC based views of the world as a collection of INDEPENDENT BEINGS with ‘our own’ powers of AUTHORING actions and developments in which case the LOCAL AUTHOR of VIOLENCE is seen as the FULLY AND SOLELY RESPONSIBLE AUTHOR of the VIOLENCE, and IS NOT SEEN, as in indigenous aboriginal culture wherein ‘mitakuye oyasin’ (everything is related) applies, as the CONDUIT or VENT for the releasing of tensions that develop and build within the social-relational matrix.   So, the indigenous aboriginal culture responds to outbreaks of violence (rape, murder, theft) with HEALING CIRCLES since the roots of the problem are seen as deriving from ‘tensions in the relational web’ and are simply finding a venting outlet through an individual strand-in-the-web.

 

BECAUSE social collectives influenced by Judaism, Christianity and Islam are dominant in GLOBAL social administration, the popular interpretation of the source of rising conflict is that it has a LOCAL, EXPLICIT SOURCE; e.g. as in the Hamas – Israeli conflict.  In psychologists’ terms in dealing with strife in families, where there is strife, the one who is identified as the AUTHOR has been labelled ‘the identified patient’ since the whole social-relational matrix is dysfunctional but it is typical that there will be one ‘holding the smoking gun’ who will be identified as the LOCAL, EXPLICIT “INDEPENDENT BEING’ that is the AUTHOR of the violence.  Meanwhile, in the indigenous aboriginal ‘web-of-life’ understanding, THE TENSIONED WEB is the AUTHOR and it is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, and this understanding accords with the QUANTUM LOGIC model wherein material CONDENSATIONS (people) are secondary, in terms of authoring source, to the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

 

So, in WESTERN CULTURE, while the nonlocal relational web is the AUTHOR of the VIOLENCE, the STRAND IN THE WEB that becomes the VENT for collective tensions, is MISTAKENLY IDENTIFIED AS THE AUTHOR.

 

In the indigenous aboriginal culture, as in Modern physics, EVERYTHING IS RELATED, thus the ATTACKING STRANDS and the ATTACKED STRANDS are part of the same WEB.

 

This is why we are ON A BUSTRIP TO HELL, since our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, which is in a global leadership position, is committed to the eliminating of what are perceived as noxious independent beings and factions, which are in fact violent strands in the one, all-including web, that have become violent through the inequities and insensitivities, largely of those strands that are convinced not only of their own ‘independence’ but of their own superiority and innocence.

 

* * *

FOOTNOTE: Since WEB-BASED AUTHORING of actions and development is NONLOCALLY INSPIRED, the approach of social collectives that attempts to MANAGE dynamics in a manner that assumes LOCAL AUTHORING of actions, is doomed to failure (such an approach ‘has its ladder up the wrong wall’).  The indigenous aboriginal ‘HEALING CIRCLE’ which encourages “SPEAKING FROM THE HEART” rather than “FROM THE HEAD”, prevents the INTELLECT from inappropriate domination in attempting to resolve NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT issues that are beyond the LOCAL and EXPLICIT analytics of the INTELLECT; e.g. no amount of interrogation of the ‘Identified Patient’ (a strand in the web) will deliver understanding of the web dynamic.

We can think of a web in terms of (A) a LOCAL, EXPLICIT thing with arms like a starfish, or, (A’) a NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT NON-THING constituted by many implicit arms (‘all my relations”) where LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING-based ‘thingness is APPEARANCE’.

ted lumley's RSS Feed
Go to Top