Believe it or NOT, HERE IS THE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING ERROR THAT IS THE SOURCE OF SCREW-UP ON A GLOBAL BASIS.

 

Spotted by Vygotsky, it has been left UNADDRESSED as far as the globally popular and globally DOMINANT system of THINKING, SPEAKING and ACTING is concerned.

 

Indigenous aboriginals (traditionalists) HAVE NEVER FALLEN INTO THIS TRAP of buying into this DEFICIENT LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME.

 

 

The ERROR comes from the FACT that we live in a WAVE-FIELD WORLD which requires us to have a WAVE-FIELD-CAPABLE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which MATCHES, more or less, OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE.   Indigenous aboriginals, as Modern Physics (Bohm and Schroedinger) have shown, and Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta (Schroedinger) has shown, DO NOT SUFFER, as WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS DO, from using a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE that must be together (in conjugate relation) WITH THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE in order to communicate in a manner that captures the WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE of our sense-experience reality.

 

THOSE PEOPLE ARE OK WHO ARE USING FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING such as “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.  OTHERS, like WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, ARE “NOT OK” BECAUSE THEY (WE) ARE USING MATERIAL BEING based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING such as “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods” which constitutes BEING based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION THAT IS NOTIONALLY SITUATED WITHIN AN EMPTY SPACE (note that the EMPTY SPACE is implied by the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PROPOSITION).

 

NOW THIS OBSERVATION; i.e. “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods”,  IS CRUCIALLY IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS GOING ON HERE.  WHILE THE FIRST VERSION OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SUPPORTS THE UNDERSTANDING THAT “EVERYTHING IS IN TRANSFORMATIVE FLUX” as implied by “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” WHICH IS AFFIRMED BY OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE OF LIVING WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM”, … THE SECOND VERSION OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING (“THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods” … “IS 100% POSITIVE MALE ASSERTING LOGICAL PROPOSITION” which we know from Goedel’s Theorem is always INCOMPLETE!”   WAVE FIELD PHENOMENA HAVE AN ANDROGYNOUS (CONJUGATE PEAK AND TROUGH) STRUCTURE which IS CAPTURED in the FLOW based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, BUT WHICH IS NOT CAPTURED in the MATERIAL OBJECT BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods” (where we speak of “THE TOWN” as a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF).  Here, we are implying that that there is a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING UNIT (THE TOWN) with the (GRAMMAR-GIVEN) POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ITS OWN GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of things).

 

SO, IN THIS SECOND VERSION OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, WHICH IS STANDARD FOR WESTERN CULTURE, OUR WORDS, which are in the form of a one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PROPOSITION,… GIVE THE IMPRESSION OF LOCAL AUTHORING POWER thanks to WHAT NIETZSCHE CALLS “THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR” as in the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods”.   THIS IS 100% MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING  (as if this is occurring in absolute empty space and there is NO FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE) … and thus it has the exposure cited by Goedel’s Theorem; i.e. THE INCOMPLETENESS OF ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS.

 

NOTA BENE: INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING IS VERB-BASED WHERE EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX AND THIS AVOIDS DEPENDENCE ON “MATERIAL BEING”; e.g. the indigenous aboriginal speaks in such terms as ‘DANCES WITH WOLVES’ instead of speaking in terms of PERSISTENT BEING as with ‘Lieutenant John Dunbar’, and this makes a FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE AS WE CAN SEE FROM THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” and “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods”.   In the former, EVERYTHING IS IN TRANSFORMATIVE FLUX, while in the latter, THE ACTION IS LOCALLY AUTHORED ACTION AS IMPLIED BY the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PROPOSITION which is 100% MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, thus this PROPOSITION ITSELF INVOKES THE IMPUTING OF ITS CONTAINMENT WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

 

NOTA BENE:  THIS SECOND VERSION EMPLOYS ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING POSITIVE PROPOSITION AND DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE THAT IS NECESSARY IN CONVEYING FLOW-BASED DYNAMICS SUCH AS TRANSFORMATION.  THIS DROP OUT, WHICH IS STANDARD IN WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, MEANS THAT WHAT WE ARE CONVEYING IS NOT THE REALITY OF OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE WHEREIN EVERYTHING IS INFLUX, as in CHIEF SEATTLE’S STRAND IN THE WEB STATEMENT THAT CAPTURES THE SAME UNDERSTANDING OF THE STRUCTURE OF THE WORLD OF OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE AS IN MODERN PHYSICS WHERE WE HAVE THE COMBINATION OF THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM WHICH IS LOCALLY POPULATED WITH CONDENSATIONS, which ‘comes with’ a NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM relationship; an example of which is the STRAND-IN-THE-WEB where the STRAND is BOTH its individual self AND the WEB in which it is included, giving the “APPEARANCE” OF INDEPENDENCE of the STRAND while the physical REALITY is INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE.

 

“Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.” (Chief Seattle)

 

“Space is not empty.  It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” (David Bohm)

 

Thus, we ‘HUMANINGS as CONDENSATIONS OF AND IN THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM’ have the APPEARANCE of being INDEPENDENT but we are in reality, as with STRANDS IN A WEB, INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT.  The SAME for CONDENSATIONS of, and in, the ALL-INCLUDING PLENUM.

 

This situation gives rise to RESTORATIVE JUSTICE since the STRAND in the WEB is NOT the AUTHOR of VIOLENCE that impacts the WEB, but the CONDUIT through which TENSIONS IN THE WEB ‘MANIFEST’ and the PROBLEM that requires resolving is relational dissonance which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT while the MANIFESTATION is LOCAL and EXPLICIT by way of TENSIONS VENTING through LOCAL and EXPLICIT ACTIONS of a STRAND.  The STRAND is NOT THE LOCAL AUTHOR of the VIOLENCE, THERE ARE NO LOCAL AUTHORS IN “THE STRAND IN THE WEB DYNAMIC” = “the CONDENSATION in the PLENUM DYNAMIC”, …there is only TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE IS PURIFICATIONIST AND ORIENTING TO THE IDENTIFICATION AND ELIMINATION OF THE (PERCEIVED) LOCAL AUTHOR OF VIOLENT ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.  BUT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.  SUCH A NOTION IS ABSTRACTION CREATED BY THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR.  The ELIMINATING is therefore a SCAPEGOATING of the IDENTIFIED PATIENT (A SCAPEGOATING of the perceived LOCAL AUTHORS of VIOLENT ACTIONS who are in reality NOTHING OTHER THAN VENTS for DRAINING THE BUILDUP of LOCAL TENSIONS).

The CONTINUING PROGRAMS OF SCAPEGOATING OF THE IDENTIFIED PATIENT HAVE THE EFFECT OF PROGRESSIVELY REMOVING THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING INFLUENCE SO THAT THE BALANCE in the community shifts from LIBERAL to CONSERVATIVE (from being informed by the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT to being informed by the LOCAL and EXPLICIT).

(more…)