HERE IS THE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING ERROR THAT IS THE SOURCE OF SCREW-UP ON A GLOBAL BASIS

Believe it or NOT, HERE IS THE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING ERROR THAT IS THE SOURCE OF SCREW-UP ON A GLOBAL BASIS.

Spotted by Vygotsky, it has been left UNADDRESSED as far as the globally popular and globally DOMINANT system of THINKING, SPEAKING and ACTING is concerned.

Indigenous aboriginals (traditionalists) HAVE NEVER FALLEN INTO THIS TRAP of buying into this DEFICIENT LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME.

The ERROR comes from the FACT that we live in a WAVE-FIELD WORLD which requires us to have a WAVE-FIELD-CAPABLE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which MATCHES, more or less, OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE.   Indigenous aboriginals, as Modern Physics (Bohm and Schroedinger) have shown, and Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta (Schroedinger) has shown, DO NOT SUFFER, as WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS DO, from using a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE that must be together (in conjugate relation) WITH THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE in order to communicate in a manner that captures the WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE of our sense-experience reality.

THOSE PEOPLE ARE OK WHO ARE USING FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING such as “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.  OTHERS, like WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, ARE “NOT OK” BECAUSE THEY (WE) ARE USING MATERIAL BEING based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING such as “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods” which constitutes BEING based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION THAT IS NOTIONALLY SITUATED WITHIN AN EMPTY SPACE (note that the EMPTY SPACE is implied by the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PROPOSITION).

NOW THIS OBSERVATION; i.e. “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods”,  IS CRUCIALLY IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTANDING WHAT IS GOING ON HERE.  WHILE THE FIRST VERSION OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SUPPORTS THE UNDERSTANDING THAT “EVERYTHING IS IN TRANSFORMATIVE FLUX” as implied by “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” WHICH IS AFFIRMED BY OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE OF LIVING WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM”, … THE SECOND VERSION OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING (“THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods” … “IS 100% POSITIVE MALE ASSERTING LOGICAL PROPOSITION” which we know from Goedel’s Theorem is always INCOMPLETE!”   WAVE FIELD PHENOMENA HAVE AN ANDROGYNOUS (CONJUGATE PEAK AND TROUGH) STRUCTURE which IS CAPTURED in the FLOW based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, BUT WHICH IS NOT CAPTURED in the MATERIAL OBJECT BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods” (where we speak of “THE TOWN” as a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF).  Here, we are implying that that there is a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING UNIT (THE TOWN) with the (GRAMMAR-GIVEN) POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ITS OWN GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of things).

SO, IN THIS SECOND VERSION OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, WHICH IS STANDARD FOR WESTERN CULTURE, OUR WORDS, which are in the form of a one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PROPOSITION,… GIVE THE IMPRESSION OF LOCAL AUTHORING POWER thanks to WHAT NIETZSCHE CALLS “THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR” as in the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods”.   THIS IS 100% MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING  (as if this is occurring in absolute empty space and there is NO FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE) … and thus it has the exposure cited by Goedel’s Theorem; i.e. THE INCOMPLETENESS OF ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS.

NOTA BENE: INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING IS VERB-BASED WHERE EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX AND THIS AVOIDS DEPENDENCE ON “MATERIAL BEING”; e.g. the indigenous aboriginal speaks in such terms as ‘DANCES WITH WOLVES’ instead of speaking in terms of PERSISTENT BEING as with ‘Lieutenant John Dunbar’, and this makes a FUNDAMENTAL DIFFERENCE AS WE CAN SEE FROM THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” and “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods”.   In the former, EVERYTHING IS IN TRANSFORMATIVE FLUX, while in the latter, THE ACTION IS LOCALLY AUTHORED ACTION AS IMPLIED BY the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PROPOSITION which is 100% MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, thus this PROPOSITION ITSELF INVOKES THE IMPUTING OF ITS CONTAINMENT WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

NOTA BENE:  THIS SECOND VERSION EMPLOYS ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING POSITIVE PROPOSITION AND DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE THAT IS NECESSARY IN CONVEYING FLOW-BASED DYNAMICS SUCH AS TRANSFORMATION.  THIS DROP OUT, WHICH IS STANDARD IN WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, MEANS THAT WHAT WE ARE CONVEYING IS NOT THE REALITY OF OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE WHEREIN EVERYTHING IS INFLUX, as in CHIEF SEATTLE’S STRAND IN THE WEB STATEMENT THAT CAPTURES THE SAME UNDERSTANDING OF THE STRUCTURE OF THE WORLD OF OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE AS IN MODERN PHYSICS WHERE WE HAVE THE COMBINATION OF THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM WHICH IS LOCALLY POPULATED WITH CONDENSATIONS, which ‘comes with’ a NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM relationship; an example of which is the STRAND-IN-THE-WEB where the STRAND is BOTH its individual self AND the WEB in which it is included, giving the “APPEARANCE” OF INDEPENDENCE of the STRAND while the physical REALITY is INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE.

“Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.” (Chief Seattle)

“Space is not empty.  It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” (David Bohm)

Thus, we ‘HUMANINGS as CONDENSATIONS OF AND IN THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM’ have the APPEARANCE of being INDEPENDENT but we are in reality, as with STRANDS IN A WEB, INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT.  The SAME for CONDENSATIONS of, and in, the ALL-INCLUDING PLENUM.

This situation gives rise to RESTORATIVE JUSTICE since the STRAND in the WEB is NOT the AUTHOR of VIOLENCE that impacts the WEB, but the CONDUIT through which TENSIONS IN THE WEB ‘MANIFEST’ and the PROBLEM that requires resolving is relational dissonance which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT while the MANIFESTATION is LOCAL and EXPLICIT by way of TENSIONS VENTING through LOCAL and EXPLICIT ACTIONS of a STRAND.  The STRAND is NOT THE LOCAL AUTHOR of the VIOLENCE, THERE ARE NO LOCAL AUTHORS IN “THE STRAND IN THE WEB DYNAMIC” = “the CONDENSATION in the PLENUM DYNAMIC”, …there is only TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE IS PURIFICATIONIST AND ORIENTING TO THE IDENTIFICATION AND ELIMINATION OF THE (PERCEIVED) LOCAL AUTHOR OF VIOLENT ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.  BUT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.  SUCH A NOTION IS ABSTRACTION CREATED BY THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR.  The ELIMINATING is therefore a SCAPEGOATING of the IDENTIFIED PATIENT (A SCAPEGOATING of the perceived LOCAL AUTHORS of VIOLENT ACTIONS who are in reality NOTHING OTHER THAN VENTS for DRAINING THE BUILDUP of LOCAL TENSIONS).

The CONTINUING PROGRAMS OF SCAPEGOATING OF THE IDENTIFIED PATIENT HAVE THE EFFECT OF PROGRESSIVELY REMOVING THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING INFLUENCE SO THAT THE BALANCE in the community shifts from LIBERAL to CONSERVATIVE (from being informed by the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT to being informed by the LOCAL and EXPLICIT).

* * * & & & * * * & & &  * * * & & &  * * * & & &

WHAT I HAVE SAID TO THIS POINT I SHALL REPEAT AS CONCISELY AS I CAN FOR CLARITY.

OUR WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME EMPLOYS THE SIMPLIFYING TACTIC OF DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE CONJUGATE OF THE ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE; I.E. DROPPING OUT THE TROUGH FROM THE PEAK AND TROUGH STRUCTURE which leaves us with a ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “PROPOSITION” (e.g. ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’) AS IF WE COULD ‘MAKE-DO’, IN OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, WITH DEPLOYING ONLY THE PEAK WHICH IS LOCAL AND EXPLICIT AND DROPPING OUT THE TROUGH WHICH IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT.  THIS AMOUNTS TO A “STREAMLINING” OF OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING APPROACH BY USING “ONLY POSITIVE PROPOSITIONS” (THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PROPOSITIONS) AS IN, FOR EXAMPLE, ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ WHERE WE SAY NOTHING ABOUT THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, AS IF “THE TOWN WAS GROWING WITHIN AN EMPTY SPACE”, in which case WE ARE SAYING (OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS ARE PROPOSING)  NOTHING ABOUT THE “TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE” WHICH IS A RADICAL OMISSION SINCE THE TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE IS THE BASIC SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY, CONVEYING THAT WHAT IS ACTUALLY TRANSPIRING IS CONSTITUTED BY THE UNION OF BOTH THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE AND THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE as constitutes THE WAVE-STRUCTURE.

THIS WESTERN CULTURE ‘DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE’ WHICH IS THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT ASPECT OF OUR FLUID DYNAMICAL REALITY HAS BEEN CAPTURED IN THE TERM ‘DEA ABSCONDITA (THE GODDESS IN HIDING)’.  This points to the fact that when we speak in terms such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING’ which is CONSTITUTED SOLELY BY POSITIVE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS, all mention of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS WHICH OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMS IS ALSO HAPPENING, GOES MISSING; i.e. WE ARE DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE as if our ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate was SUFFICIENT/ADEQUANT to SHARE OUR MESSAGE.  NOTE THAT WHILE EVERYTHING WE SAY USING POSITIVE PROPOSITIONS MAY BE CONVEYING THAT WHICH IS TRUE, BY GOEDEL’S THEOREM, THESE POSITIVE PROPOSITIONS ARE INCOMPLETE (i.e. we can’t possible convey the SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS by talking ONLY in terms of the TOWN’S GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods.

THE NATIONS OF THE WORLD THAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS TALK ABOUT AS IF THEY WERE “INDEPENDENT” are IN REALITY INTERDEPENDENT which makes our TALK where we PRETEND (and CELEBRATE THE QUOTE/UNQUOTE “INDEPENDENCE” OF OUR NATION) THE SOURCE OF PSYCHOLOGICAL DYSFUNCTION since our SENSE EXPERIENCE IS AFFIRMING OUR INTERDEPENDENCE EVEN AS THE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS WE ARE CONSTRUCTING ARE ERRONEOUSLY AFFIRMING OUR INDEPENDENCE!  As Bohm says;

“    society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.”

SERIOUSLY, WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE IN TROUBLE and WATCHING NETANYAHU and TRUMP and PUTIN playing chess with their different conceptualizations of SEPARATE “QUOTE/UNQUOTE “INDEPENDENT” NATIONS (and who gets to CREATE THEM and WHO DOES NOT), FLIES IN THE FACE OF THE MODERN PHYSICS and INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING, GROUNDED IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE, THAT EVERYTHING IS INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT AS WITH STRANDS IN A WEB;

“Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.” (Chief Seattle)

“Space is not empty.  It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” (David Bohm)

JUSTICE must be RESTORATIVE RATHER THAN PURIFICATIONIST since THE WEB FEEDS ITS TENSIONS THROUGH TO THE STRAND WHOSE VIOLENCE IS A VENTING FROM THE WEB AND IS NOT “JUMPSTART AUTHORED” BY THE STRAND ITSELF.  The WESTERN CULTURE SCAPE-GOATING OF THE (MIS-) IDENTIFIED “LOCAL-AUTHOR OF VIOLENCE” is the ASSUMPTION THAT UNDERLIES WESTERN CULTURE PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE.  THIS IS AN ERROR NOT FOUND IN THE LINGUISTIC  CONCEPTUALIZING OF INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS where the ORIGIN OF VIOLENT ACTION is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT rather than LOCAL and EXPLICIT, in which case it follows that JUSTICE MUST BE RESTORATIVE RATHER THAN PURIFICATIONIST.  MODERN PHYSICS has shown that the WAVE-FIELD, which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, is the FOUNDATIONAL DYNAMIC while the MATERIAL DYNAMIC which “APPEARS” LOCAL and EXPLICIT is “Schaumkommen”.

* * * * * * *

OK, WHAT ARE THE PRIMARY TAKE-AWAYS IN THIS WAKE-UP CALL?  They include;

-1- NATIONS OF PEOPLE ARE NOT INDEPENDENT, they are INTERDEPENDENT.  IMAGINARY BOUNDARY LINES THAT PURPORT TO DEFINE INDEPENDENT NATIONS ONLY ACHIEVE SUCH “INDEPENDENCE” by way of INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION and only the OBEDIENT INTELLECTS will pay attention to imaginary line based boundaries, ENCOURAGED BY gun-toting border guards.  The fact that there is wide (GLOBAL) POPULAR support (though not by indigenous aboriginals) of the notion of INDEPENDENT NATIONS DEFINED BY IMAGINARY LINE BORDERS, most people do not have much choice (OPERATIVE TRUTHS CAN BE ESTABLISHED BY MAJORITY VOTE) because the trend to DECLARE INDEPENDENCE has GONE GLOBAL and is held together by MILITARY FORCES which MAKE BELIEVERS out of the HERD members and have been able to keep people BOXED in behind the IMAGINARY BOUNDARY LINES that partition most of the world, and have been sustained in spite of ongoing territorial battles as can be seen in historical accounts such as The Changing Borders of Poland’. This intellectual game akin to musical chairs, while it has quieted down considerably, is being opened up again, by Putin and Netanyahu who are not happy about where things were left the last time the map-making music stopped.

-2- RESTORATIVE JUSTICE as practiced by indigenous aboriginals has a solid foundation in sense-experience grounded reality that IS NOT PRESENT IN WESTERN CULTURE PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE BASED ON MAKING BINARY LOGIC DISTINCTIONS BETWEEN GOOD AND EVIL (with the aim of PROLIFERATING GOOD and ELIMINATING EVIL).  BINARY LOGIC SUPPORTS TOO-SIMPLE ABSTRACTIONS based on INDEPENDENT BEINGS that cannot deal with the REAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT complexity of THE WEB OF LIFE as supported by modern physics CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.  The STRANDS IN THE WEB and the CONDENSATIONS IN THE PLENUM are understandings that support the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein, for example, the STRAND is BOTH ITSELF and the WEB it is INCLUDED IN and the CONDENSATION is BOTH ITSELF and the PLENUM it is INCLUDED IN.   Since the STRANDS in the WEB are INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT, we, as individual (but not independent) STRANDS are in a situation wherein  “Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”   This is the understanding supported by MODERN PHYSICS; i.e. MODERN PHYSICS DOES NOT SUPPORT the ABSTRACTION OF “INDEPENDENCE” OF ANYTHING IN NATURE aka the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD wherein CONDENSATIONS are ONLY LOCAL AND EXPLICIT IN APPEARANCE but are in sense-experience affirmed REALITY, inclusions in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, the “PLENUM” which as Bohm says “is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” 

-3-  ITS NOT THAT MOST OF US HAVE THOUGHT ALL THIS STUFF THROUGH FOR OURSELVES AND HAVE ALL (or almost all) MADE THE MISTAKE OF USING DUMBED DOWN TOO SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC IN OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING AS IS OUR PRESENT WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL CIRCUMSTANCE, BECAUSE THESE BINARY LOGIC BASED UNDERSTANDINGS WERE PUMPED INTO US IN OUR CHILDHOOD BEFORE WE HAD A CHANCE TO THINK THINGS THROUGH FOR OURSELVES.  As Psychiatrist Ronald Laing and Anthropologist Jules Henry have both discerned from their respective research works, WESTERN CULTURE EDUCATION is an INFUSION PROCESS akin to that used to feed geese to make foie gras (fatty livers) where WE ONE IS FORCE-FED “UNDERSTANDINGS” in which case WE DID NOT GET A CHANCE TO CONTEST OUR NOW HABITUAL USE OF TOO-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC WHICH IS THE ROOT SOURCE OF FRAGMENTION AND OBSCURANTISM THAT PERVADES WESTERN CULTURE SOCIETY;

“It is Henry’s contention that in practice education has never been an instrument to free the mind and the spirit of man, but to bind them. We think we want creative children, but what do we want them to create? — ‘If all through school the young were provoked to question the Ten Commandments, the sanctity of revealed religion, the foundations of patriotism, the profit motive, the two party system, monogamy, the laws of incest, and so on … — there would be such creativity that society would not know where to turn. …  Children do not give up their innate imagination, curiousity, dreaminess easily. You have to love them to get them to do that. Love is the path through permissiveness to discipline; and through discipline, only too often, to betrayal of self.” R. D. Laing

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

CLOSING THOUGHTS:

As we can see by considering the assertions of OUR WESTERN CULTURE SCREWED UP LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, Bohm as well as Jules Henry (‘Culture Against Man’) and Ronald Laing, are together in claiming that WESTERN CULTURE is SCREWED UP by the serious errors or inconsistencies that have been infused into our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME and are from there being pumped into our defenseless children (Children do not give up their innate imagination, curiousity, dreaminess easily. You have to love them to get them to do that. Love is the path through permissiveness to discipline; and through discipline, only too often, to betrayal of self.”)

WHAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE DROPPED OUT OF OUR OPERATIVE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME IS THE FEMALE ASPECT WHICH IS THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT ASPECT (the energy charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD that provides the INTERCONNECTING and INTERDEPENDENCE needed to give grounding context to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.  WE HAVE SUBSTITUTED AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE in place of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM whose presence (where it is NOT ABSENT) is supporting all of the INTERCONNECTING and INTERDEPENDENCE and thus whose UNREAL absence (where it goes missing from our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING PROCESS) is the source of UNREAL FRAGMENTATION due to ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE … EMPTY SPACE THAT DIVIDES AND INSULATES THAT IS NOT CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE as the energy charged PLENUM does.   WHAT A DIFFERENCE A PLENUM MAKES TO OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME!  WITHOUT IT, WE GET WHAT BOHM DESCRIBES IN HIS CHAPTER ON FRAGMENTATION IN ‘WHOLENESS AND THE IMPLICATE ORDER’, as cited earlier;

“    society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.”

WHEREAS, NONE OF THIS FRAGMENTATION IS FOUND IN INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, as Bohm has pointed out;

What is needed, Bohm argued in his book Wholeness and the Implicate Order, is a new sort of language, one based on processes and activity, transformation and change, rather than on the interactions of stable objects. Bohm called this hypothetical language the “rheomode.” It is based primarily on verbs and on grammatical structures deriving from verbs. Such a language, Bohm argued, is perfectly adapted to a reality of enfolding and unfolding matter and thought.

David Bohm had not known when he wrote of that concept that such a language is not just a physicist’s hypothesis. It actually exists. The language of the Algonquin peoples was developed by the ancestors specifically to deal with subtle matters of reality, society, thought, and spirituality.

A few months before his death, Bohm met with a number of Algonkian speakers and was struck by the perfect bridge between their language and worldview and his own exploratory philosophy. What to Bohm had been major breakthroughs in human thought — quantum theory, relativity, his implicate order and rheomode – were part of the everyday life and speech of the Blackfoot, Mic Maq, Cree and Ojibwaj.” – F. David Peat, ‘Blackfoot Physics’

* * * * * * *

HERE, IN THE ABOVE, IS AN ACCOUNT OF THE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING ERROR THAT IS THE SOURCE OF SCREW-UP ON A GLOBAL BASIS

FOOTNOTE:  ONE COMMON MISTAKE IN LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING THAT IS EASY FOR THE WESTERN CULTURE READER TO FALL PREY TO.

-1- While the indigenous aboriginal (and Modern physics) understanding is that when there is an outbreak of violence in a social collective, there is NO WAY to determine LOCAL AUTHORING and thus assign FAULT.  This is because of the interconnected and interdependent WEB OF RELATIONS wherein we have material forms that are CONDENSATIONS of an all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.    ALL CONDENSATIONS are innately INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT by virtue of being included within ONE ALL INCLUDING energy-charged PLENUM.  The same relations of INTERCONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE are found in the indigenous aboriginal STRAND-IN-THE-WEB mataphor; i.e. the STRANDS of the WEB are INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT and it is IMPOSSIBLE to ISOLATE THE MOVEMENTof a PARTICULAR STRAND IN THE WEB other than by VISUALLY IMPOSING A FIXED FRAME and thus put it into ITS OWN REFERENCE FRAME which means REMOVING THE STRAND FROM THE WEB which CHANGES THE REALITY since it is then just a STRAND on its lonesome and NOT the STRAND-IN-THE-WEB whose relational dynamics we are interested in.

Before we go further in this ‘investigation’, it may be useful to review the MINER’S CANARY dynamic which can confuse a person for reasons that will be explained and which apply also to the STRAND IN THE WEB.

The complication in the Miner’s Canary example is that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT commonly use the BINARY EITHER/OR LANGUAGE of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM wherein we automatically assume an EMPTY SPACE medium in which case, in understanding the dynamics of a thing, such as a human being, we focus on and are only interested in that LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEING and its internal workings. If the CANARY starts behaving strangely then we may hospitalize the CANARY to take X-Rays and CT-scans and thoroughly examine the CANARY.    But as we know from the Miner’s Canary anecdote, we are accustomed to making the simplification, that we commonly take for granted, that when the CANARY behaves strangely, the problem is that something is wrong the canary.  But in that case, we are missing the possibility of the problem being a healthy and sensitive canary whose aberrant behaviour is coming from its responding to a TOXIC ENVIRONMENT.  There is always the environment influence which may vary from toxic to nurturant and mildly or strongly so.  That is the general case and not the exception and the common practice of NOT INCLUDING IN OUR EXPLORATION, assessment of the role of ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES is based on our assuming that they are generally negligable.

BUT where we have a STRAND IN THE WEB situation, where “THE STRAND” is a member of the complex comunity and the WEB “IS” the complex community, there is an exposurse to influences based on INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE (the general properties of being a material condensation in an all-including energy-charged PLENUM aka wave-field.  We are always included in the situation where we as a condensation are influencing the uncondensed field at the same time as the field is influencing the included condensation, reminding us of our INCLUSION in the ALL-INCLUDING energy-charged PLENUM and reminding us as well that; “Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”

The POINT I wanted to bring out in this footnote is that BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM is a MAJOR THREAT to our WESTERN CULTURE SANITY and that, by contrast, the STRAND IN THE WEB understanding brings with it a level of LOGIC that is NONBINARY, BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDED MEDIUM based which is LESS SIMPLE and should be used INSTEAD OF BINARY LOGIC because we don’t want to be stuck thinking “THE TOWN IS GROWING” full stop when the reality is that there is CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS and these two conjugates DO NOT SPLIT APART INTO TWO SEPARATE THINGS in which case THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “A TOWN THAT IS GROWING”; it DOES NOT EXIST.  What does exist is that there is TOWNING in theTRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which includes the conjugate SHRINKINGof WILDERNESS.  Likewise, there is NO ‘U.S. ECONOMY’, the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING cannot exist on its own.   The QUICK TAKE-AWAY from this footnote is that BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM substitutes ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, DUMBING DOWN our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS.

The STRAND IN THE WEB structure employs a less simple NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM as where the STRAND is not only itself but at the same time, the WEB it is includedin.  NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM IS LOGIC that can support concepts such as the TOXIC ENVIRONMENT and/or the NURTURANT ENVIRONMENT where individual behaviour cannot be understood by investigating the individual out of the context of environmental influence.

FOOTNOTE:  ONE COMMON MISTAKE IN LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING THAT IS EASY FOR THE WESTERN CULTURE READER TO FALL PREY TO; i.e. THE USE OF BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM.

.