POSTSCRIPT TO: KRISTI NOEM and the DEA ABSCONDITA

 

 

My guess is that FEW PEOPLE would NOT ‘pick up’ on the “EXTREME DIFFERENCE” between the outlook of KRISTI NOEM versus the outlook of Minneapolis mayor, Jacob Frey on the ICE shooting and killing of Renee Nicole Good.  But perhaps even FEWER PEOPLE would be contemplating Nietzsche’s point that such events cannot be understood in a limited “LOCAL, EXPLICIT” context because of their “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT MAKE-UP”.

 

Everybody knows that “TROUBLE HAS BEEN BREWING” and it involves POLARIZING ANIMOSITY between ADMINISTRATORS and the ADMINISTRATED where the ADMINISTRATORS are AUTHORIZED while the ADMINISTRATED are UNAUTHORIZED; i.e. this ORDER imposing approach is radically unlike an indigenous aboriginal HEALING CIRCLE where everyone is an equal.  In this WESTERN CULTURE ORDER IMPOSING APPROACH some people are AUTHORIZED and others are UNAUTHORIZED.   IMPOSING CHANGE through AUTHORITY is common in the WESTERN CULTURE VERSION OF “DEMOCRACY” which is radically unlike, for example, the indigenous aboriginal version of “DEMOCRACY” where  Decision-making frequently emphasizes extensive community consultation and striving for consensus, rather than simple majority rule, to ensure harmony and broad community support.

 

These differences are underlain by the MORE RADICAL difference in that indigenous aboriginals have the understanding of ‘mitakuye oyasin’, that everyone is related in the manner of STRANDS IN THE WEB OF LIFE whereas WESTERN CULTURE has implemented a system based on the assumption that EACH PERSON, rather than being a STRAND in the INTERCONNECTING and INTERDEPENDENT WEB, as an INDEPENDENT BEING with “ITS OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, which is of course UNREAL (ABSTRACT) LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION that has us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS believing in the FALSE NOTION of “LOCAL AUTHORING” of actions and development.  While Nietzsche has expounded on the DOUBLE ERROR foundation of “LOCAL AUTHORING”, HOWEVER, THE WESTERN CULTURE PRACTICE OF USING THIS “REALITY FRAGMENTING DEVICE” CONTINUES TO DISTURBE THE WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHE AND THUS SOCIAL DYNAMIC;

 

Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

 

In its origin language belongs in the age of the most rudimentary form of psychology. We enter a realm of crude fetishism when we summon before consciousness the basic presuppositions of the metaphysics of language, in plain talk, the presuppositions of reason. Everywhere it sees a doer and doing; it believes in will as the cause; it believes in the ego, in the ego as being, in the ego as substance, and it projects this faith in the ego-substance upon all things — only thereby does it first create the concept of “thing.” Everywhere “being” is projected by thought, pushed underneath, as the cause; the concept of being follows, and is a derivative of, the concept of ego. In the beginning there is that great calamity of an error that the will is something which is effective, that will is a faculty. Today we know that it is only a word.” – Nietzsche, ‘Twilight of the Idols’

 

SO, THIS DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMAR, which has undeservedly been given a foundational role in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE AND THOUGHT is the source of FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE by way of its use in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  To say “THE TOWN IS GROWING” (this is an example of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR) PROMOTES THE IMPRESSION OF THE TOWN AS A NOTIONAL “LOCAL ENTITY”, NOTIONALLY WITH “ITS OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT” (in this case, “ITS OWN GROWTH”).    We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE SO ACCUSTOMED TO HEARING AND USING THIS “DOUBLE ERROR” THAT WE NO LONGER SEE THAT IT IS A “DOUBLE ERROR” in which case, we ACCEPT the NOTION of “LOCAL AUTHORING” which is a MASSIVE SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION that does not occur, for example, in indigenous aboriginal culture where the use of FLOW-BASED (RELATIONAL) LANGUAGE captures the SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY where “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” wherein everything is in INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT FLUX, as affirmed by Modern physics (wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka wave-field).

 

AS DISCUSSED IN PRIOR NOTES, and as underscored hereabove by Nietzsche, “EGO” is the SUSTAINER of this FALSE NOTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING given by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as in the example “THE TOWN IS GROWING” (here we have the LOCAL and EXPLICIT MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ON ITS OWN) which eclipses the sense-experience affirmed REALITY that “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”  (here we have the full complement of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING in conjugate relation with the LOCAL and EXPLICIT MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING).   The LATTER linguistic conceptualizing scheme with the full ANDROGYNOUS COMPLEMENT is found in indigenous aboriginal linguistic conceptualizing schemes (STRAND IN THE WEB schemes) but in WESTERN CULTURE, LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING has evolved in such a manner as to DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate hence reference to the DEA ABSCONDITA aka GODDESS IN HIDING.

 

NOW, WESTERN CULTURE IS HAPPY WITH THIS DROP OUT BECAUSE IT SHIFTS CREDIT FOR LOCAL AUTHORING AWAY FROM THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT AND FALSELY REPOSITIONS IT AS IF ORIGINATING FROM THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT; instead of THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which is the full ANDROGYNOUS conceptualization, WESTERN CULTURE has developed the habitual DOUBLE ERROR of going with ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIIZING conjugate consisting of the combination of NAMING-INSTANTIATED BEING animated by GRAMMAR-instantiated AGENCY.  THIS WORKS AS A COMMUNICATIONS DEVICE but AT THE EXPENSE of SWAPPING OUT A FULL-BLOWN ANDROGYNOUS REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION FOR A HALF-ASSED, MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY, CONCEPUALIZATION, which is EGO-INFLATING due to its FALSELY IMPLIED LOCAL AUTHORING POWER, and this EGO INFLATION IS WHY THIS SERIOUS DOUBLE ERROR BUILT INTO OUR WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME “PERSISTS”.

 

DONALD TRUMP, EQUIPPED WITH THE DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR CAN CLAIM “I BUILT MAR A LAGO” AND  “I CAPTURED NICOLÁS MADURO”.   HERE WE HAVE THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “ON ITS OWN” without acknowledgement of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING as implicit in “TO EVERYTHING THERE IS A SEASON AND A TIME TO EVERY PURPOSE”.   That is, I may put words together to say that I launched my Hobi-Cat from Fort Walton Beach, but SHOULD I ACKNOWLEDGE THE FACT THAT I waited for the gap between two breakers on the beach, picking the exact moment between the breaking waves to tighten the sheet and fill sail, scooting out into deeper water to avoid getting smacked by the next incoming breaker.   What I am describing is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate to my MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING agency.  The FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE is actually the PRIMARY REALITY while my MALE ASSERTING/ACTIONS are only APPEARANCE (Schaumkommen).  It is our EUROPEAN LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that has us DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and THIS DROPOUT DOES NOT OCCUR IN indigenous aboriginal and other flow-based linguistic conceptualizing schemes where one says something like; “THE WIND AND SURF PICKED UP THE SAILBOAT LIKE A TOY AND SCOOTED IT OUT INTO THE OCEAN as a sailor onboard rode it like a bucking bronco pulling on the sail-sheets like reins.

 

There is ambiguity here with respect to the AUTHORING SOURCE OF ACTION.  While we are familiar with the verse “to everything there is a season and a time to every purpose” which clearly gives the highest level of influence to the transforming relational continuum we share inclusion in, we appear to have INVERTED THE ORDER of things when we say “I sailed the Hobi-cat from Fort Wilton beach to Destin harbour”.  The point is that the linguistic conceptualizing scheme we are using seems to FLIP MODES without our announcing it.

 

MODES OF WHAT?

 

I am thinking that this is pointed to by Erich Jantsch’s THREE MODES OF AWARENESS where the two lower modes of awareness are CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL both concern LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.  CONSERVATIVES see things in a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING MANNER such as THE HURRICANE IS STIRRING UP THE ATMOSPHERE while the LIBERALS see things in a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING MANNER such as THE ATMOSPHERE IS STIRRING UP THE HURRICANE, and while the CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS lock horns and pursue their INNATELY UNRESOLVABLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM ISSUE, the indigenous aboriginals point out that there is a THIRD OPTION called TRANSFORMATION that includes the TWO POLARIZING OPTIONS of CONSERVATIVE (the hurricane is stirring up the atmosphere) and LIBERAL (the atmosphere is stirring up the hurricane) and THAT THIRD OPTION is TRANSFORMATION which we don’t see if we are looking at the CONSERVATIVE HURRICANE STIRRING THE ATMOSPHERE on the RIGHT and the LIBERAL ATMOSPHERE STIRRING THE HURRICANE ON THE LEFT because TRANSFORMING IS COMING FROM SOLAR IRRADIANCE WHICH IS OVERHEAD.

 

Indigenous aboriginals are attuned to the LEVEL 1 AWARENESS (The third option which includes the other two.  NOTICE that level 3 CONSERVATIVE AWARENESS and LEVEL 2 LIBERAL AWARENESS are both BINARY LOGIC based (they are EITHER RIGHT OR WRONG).   LEVEL 1 AWARENESS is a LOGIC that is BOTH RIGHT AND WRONG.  LEVEL 1 AWARENESS ASSOCIATES WITH SOLAR IRRADIANCE THAT INDUCES BOTH LOW PRESSURE AREAS and HIGH-PRESSURE AREAS IN CONJUGATE RELATION.  IF they are coming from BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM (EMPTY SPACE), they will JUST SIT THERE AND HEAD-BUTT, but if they can UPGRADE to the NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the “INCLUDING MEDIUM”, they can UPGRADE from the EMPTY SPACE SUBSTITUTE FOR FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING (the DEA ABSCONDITA) to the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, the INCLUDING THIRD.

 

* * * * * * *

 

END OF POSTSCRIPT TO: KRISTI NOEM and the DEA ABSCONDITA

 

KRISTI NOEM and the DEA ABSCONDITA

 

 

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have a FUNNY way of TALKING where we get VERY SELECTIVE in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  Part of this FUNNINESS has been tagged as ‘the DEA ABSCONDITA’ (the Goddess in hiding) which is due to the fact that while the dynamics we are reporting on with our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME have conjugate MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING components, our WESTERN CULTURE habit is to DROP OUT (and NOT MENTION) the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING component.   For example, in WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE, there is an expression “TAKE YOUR VICTIMS AS THEY COME” referring to such cases as when someone punches another person in the head and that person has a paper-thin SKULL which is ready to cave-in if struck by a wind-blown beetle.  Since change in the case of two things colliding is determined by the combination of the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING influence of the FIST in conjugate relation with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ‘give’ of the SKULL, it may happen that while the PUNCH may be a feeble blow, because the SKULL is weak and thin, it SHATTERS and COLLAPSES (is highly accommodating/enabling) even though the BLOW is soft and weak.  As in a BOXING MATCH that is FIXED, it is difficult if not impossible to assess the proportion of the AFFECT that is coming from the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING power of the PUNCH and the proportion of the AFFECT that is coming from the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the SKULL.   That is why WESTERN JUSTICE had decided to ERR in favour of the VICTIM, hence the slogan “TAKE YOUR VICTIMS AS THEY COME” directed to the attacker.

 

This topic is really about wave-field dynamics and gets more complex than one might expect.  For example, We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have DROPPED OUT OF OUR LANGUAGE, the acknowledgement of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate so that WE ONLY ACKNOWLEDGE the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE.  For example we say that THE TOWN IS GROWING which is the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING aspect …. WITHOUT ACKNOWLEDGING/MENTIONING the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLIGN  “CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS”.   Those who were managing things for us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, wanted to simplify our language architecture and one way to do it was to DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING and employing ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, hence we say “THE TOWN IS GROWING” without acknowledge that THAT CAN’T HAPPEN WITHOUT THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS (or the non-town land area)

 

THIS DOESN’T HAPPEN for indigenous aboriginals and others who have opted for VERB based rather than NOUN based linguistic conceptualizing schemes because, since we live in a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, a world that is in continuing flux, an appropriate linguistic conceptualizing approach needs to be FLOW-BASED and AVOID NOUNS that stand for PERSISTING MATERIAL ENTITIES that we purport to be LOCAL AUTHORS of actions and development, which BINARY LOGIC establishes as EITHER GOOD or BAD.

 

Listening to Kristi Noem in her interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper brings to mind how WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC infuses dysfunction into our social dynamics.  For example, Trump and Kristi Noem seem obsessed with the BINARY LOGIC SPLIT into ADMINISTRATORS and ADMINISTRATED. This brings to mind the following;

 

The Experiment (2010): An American thriller where participants in a prison role-play experiment quickly descend into cruelty as guards and inmates, starring Adrien Brody and Forest Whitaker.

The Stanford Prison Experiment (2015): A docudrama focusing specifically on the notorious 1971 Stanford study where students played prisoners and guards, showing how power corrupts.

Das Experiment (2001): The German-language film that serves as the basis for the 2010 American version, also dealing with a similar social experiment. 

These films explore themes of power, authority, and how easily people can adopt abusive roles in a structured environment, drawing inspiration from Philip Zimbardo’s study. 

 

Indigenous aboriginal cultures, by comparison, do not use the BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM LOGIC ADMINISTRATOR-ADMINISTRATED SEGREGATION as with POLICE and PUBLIC but instead use techniques wherein everyone is equal

 

“To Engels, Morgan’s description of the Iroquois [In Lewis Henry Morgan’s Ancient Society and The League of the Haudenosaunee or Iroquois] was important because “it gives us the opportunity of studying the organization of a society which, as yet, knows no state.”  Jefferson had also been interested in the Iroquois’ ability to maintain social concensus without a large state apparatus, as had Franklin.  Engels described the Iroquoian state in much the same way that American revolutionaries had a century earlier: “Everything runs smoothly without soldiers, gendarmes, or police, without nobles, kings, governors, prefects or judges; without prisons, without trials.  All quarrels and disputes are settled by the whole body of those concerned. . . . The household is run communistically by a number of families; the land is tribal property, only the small gerdens being temporarily assigned to the households — still, not a bit of our extensive and complicated machinery of administration is required. . . . There are no poor and needy.  The communistic household and the gens know their responsibility  towards the aged, the sick and the disabled in war.  All are free and equal — including the women.” — Bruce E. Johansen, Forgotten Founders.

 

This is backed up by RESTORATIVE JUSTICE based on the NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM of the HEALING CIRCLE

 

While this brings everyone together, WESTERN CULTURE social conventions are based on BINARY LOGIC which opens up TWO ALTERNATIVE PATHS which can lead to INTERNAL CONFLICT;

 

From a  March 1, 2023 article in Scientific American  https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/many-differences-between-liberals-and-conservatives-may-boil-down-to-one-belief/ we have the following summary assessment of the difference between the two WESTERN CULTURE POLITICAL FACTIONS of CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS.

 

 

Many Differences between Liberals and Conservatives May Boil Down to One Belief

Conservatives tend to believe that strict divisions are an inherent part of life. Liberals do not

 

In politics, researchers usually define “conservativism” as a general tendency to resist change and tolerate social inequality. “Liberalism” means a tendency to embrace change and reject inequality. 

 

While BOTH Conservatives and Liberals use the BINARY LOGIC “ADMINISTRATORS – ADMINISTRATED” SPLIT but it seems clear that TRUMP and the CONSERVATIVES are TAKING TO EXTREME LIMITS their ADMINISTRATOR POWERS over the ADMINISTERED and are PUSHING AHEAD with the ICE activities in spite of MASSIVE PROTESTS from the ‘ADMINISTERED’.   There is no HEALING CIRCLE remedy in WESTERN CULTURE ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE and ADMINISTRATORS like TRUMP see those with more sensitive and accommodating ADMINISTRATIVE PREFERENCES such as DEMOCRATS, as WEAK and PROBLEMATIC. 

 

The BINARY LOGIC ADMINISTRATOR – ADMINISTRATED POLARIZING DIVISION OPENS the DOOR to UNRESOLVABLE HEAD-BUTTING CONFLICT, which is exacerbated by the POPULARITY, in WESTERN CULTURE, of BINARY LOGIC (EITHER/OR) THINKING that is without the reconciliating tool of the HEALING CIRCLE wherein people pass the talking stick and SPEAK FROM THE HEART, where the NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM comes into play.

 

Modern physics has show how the understanding built into the indigenous aboriginal NONBINARY management traditions (e.g. the STRAND in the WEB approach where interconnection and interdependence is acknowledged) is free of the ERRORS that have been built into the WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC management traditions which wrongly assume INDEPENDENT BEING and LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS instead on, in reality the prevalence of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.   The mistaken elevating by WESTERN CULTURE of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (male asserting/actualizing) over the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (female accommodating/enabling) is a recipe for dysfunction also known as the DEA ABSCONDITA (the Goddess in hiding).

 

* * * * * *

 

 

 

 

HOW the ONGOING FEUD BETWEEN CONSERVATIVES AND LIBERALS IS POSTPONING ITS RESOLUTION

 

LIBERALS and CONSERVATIVES HOLD CONFLICTING VIEWS THAT ARE BOTH CORRECT.

 

This would be immediately understandable if both parties upgraded from BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM to NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.

 

Because WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using BINARY LOGIC, LIBERALS who are most enamored by the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) property of the “wave-trough”  prefer to be ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING while CONSERVATIVES who are most enamored by the LOCAL and EXPLICIT property of the “wave-peak” prefer to be ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.

 

BUT BECAUSE WESTERN CULTURE has developed the habit of giving a simple BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM based structure to our linguistic conceptualizing scheme, we are LIMITING of our conceptualizing to “WHAT THINGS DO” which is the LOCAL and EXPLICIT property of the WAVE-PEAK aka the ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING COMPONENT, referred to by Nietzsche as THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR.  For example, our language, as we have designed it, supports our saying “THE TOWN IS GROWING” which is just the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT (visualize “the town is growing”; i.e. it has a male asserting/actualizing conceptual structure).

 

At the same time, we DROP OUT all acknowledgement of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT corresponding to the wave-trough which is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate aspect which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.   This is a MAJOR DROP-OUT OF AN IMPORTANT (AND PRIMARY) ASPECT OF OUR REALITY, which has us saying things like ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ where there is NO MENTION of the ‘CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS’ and thus the overall ANDROGYNOUS TRANSFORMATION OF THE LANDSCAPE (i.e. the shrinking of wilderness together with [in conjugate relation with] the growth of the town).

 

The DISAPPEARANCE in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate has been termed the DEA ABSCONDITA (goddess in hiding).

 

This simplification in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, where we DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate and BACKFILL with ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE so that what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS use as our OPERATIVE LANGUAGE is the combination of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING agents AS IF WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which means that FULL AND SOLE CREDITS for whatever happens can only be attributed to MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as if in empty space.

 

GETTING RID OF (DROPPING OUT) the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate GREATLY SIMPLIFIED OUR WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME and this SHORT CUT of REALITY in WESTERN SCIENCE (and not only in the ABRAHAMIC religions) dates back to Copernicus 1514.

 

And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion

 

Western culture linguistic conceptualization used the BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM to support a simplified understanding of motion as in Newtonian physics.  By CONTRAST, indigenous aboriginals, with their ‘STRAND IN THE WEB’ understanding of dynamics were on the same page as MODERN PHYSICS (where material forms are understood as condensations of the all-including energy-charged PLENUM) which invoked the NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM. The BOTH/AND LOGIC of the CONDENSATION of the energy-charged PLENUM in the energy-charged PLENUM had the same NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM as the STRAND in the WEB.   

 

“Space is not empty.  It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” (Bohm). 

 

This fullness of the agreement between Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal understanding of the world was acknowledged by David Bohm, as F. David Peat notes in ‘Blackfoot Physics’;

 

What is needed, Bohm argued in his book Wholeness and the Implicate Order, is a new sort of language, one based on processes and activity, transformation and change, rather than on the interactions of stable objects. Bohm called this hypothetical language the “rheomode.” It is based primarily on verbs and on grammatical structures deriving from verbs. Such a language, Bohm argued, is perfectly adapted to a reality of enfolding and unfolding matter and thought.

 

David Bohm had not known when he wrote of that concept that such a language is not just a physicist’s hypothesis. It actually exists. The language of the Algonquin peoples was developed by the ancestors specifically to deal with subtle matters of reality, society, thought, and spirituality.

 

A few months before his death, Bohm met with a number of Algonkian speakers and was struck by the perfect bridge between their language and worldview and his own exploratory philosophy. What to Bohm had been major breakthroughs in human thought — quantum theory, relativity, his implicate order and rheomode – were part of the everyday life and speech of the Blackfoot, Mic Maq, Cree and Ojibwaj.” 

– F. David Peat, ‘Blackfoot Physics’

 

So, the STRAND in the WEB relation is worth some contemplation because it not only agrees with the Modern physics structure of the universe (energy-charged plenum which includes material condensations) or in other words, CONDENSATIONS that we associate with material forms in which case the material forms have this same BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM relation; i.e. the CONDENSATIONS are BOTH themselves AND the energy-charged PLENUM they share inclusion in.  The same applies to the STRANDS in the WEB; i.e. the STRANDS are BOTH themselves AND the WEB they share inclusion in.

 

The STRAND in the WEB relation reaffirms the understanding of Mitakuye Oyasin that we are all related, including the four-leggeds, the two-leggeds, the rooted, the winged and the crawly ones etc.   Modern physics and indigenous aboriginals are ‘together’ on this understanding that everything is related;

 

As Chief Seattle observes  “Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.” 

 

Likewise, Schroedinger affirms; The world is given to me only once, not one existing and one perceived.  Subject and object are only one. The barrier between them cannot be said to have broken down as a result of recent experience in the physical sciences, for this barrier does not exist.”  This is an alternative restatement of “Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.”

 

What this means is that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS need to CHANGE OUR LANGUAGE because we continue to use language wherein we claim to be ‘independent beings’ with our own powers of local authoring of actions and developments as if within an absolute empty and infinite space.   This is wrong.  We are STRANDS in the WEB  wherein everything is INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT which means we need a new language that captures this, as Zen Scholar Alan Watts tried to convince us, … as well as Bohm who had early on developed a flow-based language.

 

The point following points about the structure of language are important and need to be constantly reinforced, such as the needed NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM because they can easily slip away from us and we fall back into the too simply BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM.  

 

We have to realize and remember that our reality is NOTHING LIKE THAT BEING ASSUMED BY EITHER WESTERN CULTURE CONSERVATIVES OR WESTERN CULTURE LIBERALS, our reality is like the reality understood by indigenous aboriginals which agrees with the reality understood by Modern physics wherein we are condensations of the energy-charged PLENUM which means that we are BOTH OURSELVES, CONDENSATIONS of the PLENUM AND AT THE SAME TIME, THE PLENUM (as with the both/and logic of the including medium).

 

While much has been ‘cleared up’ in the above commentary, what is still needed is clarification of HOW PEOPLE SPLIT UP INTO CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL and more important, COME OUT FIGHTING ONE ANOTHER.  While I need to share the full three layered model in which CONSERVATIVES is the most simple and LIBERALS are the second most simple and, although we haven’t reviewed it here yet, LEVEL 1, the highest level is TRANSFORMATION which are all included in and CAN GET IN TOUCH WITH if we can momentarily LET GO of our preoccupation with AWARENESS LEVEL 3 and 2 (CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL).  LEVEL 1 is awareness of the TRANSFORMATION we share inclusion in.  This is where Schroedinger is telling us that we are capable of understanding that SUBJECT and OBJECT are ONLY ONE.

 

The THREE LEVELS of AWARENESS are described right below, but I just want to make one quick comment on the current attention being given to the LOWEST TWO LEVELS of AWARENESS; i.e. the CONSERVATIVE LEVEL is the LOWEST AWARENESS and the LIBERAL LEVEL is the nest to LOWEST, while the TRANSFORMATION LEVEL is highest.  And, again, LEVEL 1 awareness includes AWARENESS LEVELS 2 and 3, and LEVEL 2 awareness includes AWARENESS LEVEL 3. 

 

NOW, A KEY POINT.  THE FRICTION between CONSERVATIVES (level 3 AWARENESS adherents) and LIBERALS (level 2 AWARENESS adherents) is OPERATIVE FOR ONE VERY SIMPLE REASON.  IT IS BECAUSE both camps are using (TOO) SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC and BINARY LOGIC DUMBS THINGS DOWN SO INSTEAD OF CONSERVATISM and LIBERALISM BEING COMPLEMENTARY as with PEAK and TROUGH as would be the case if we were understanding them using NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM, our use of SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM is the source of the CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL CONFLICT.  IT is ALSO the case that we cannot get to AWARENESS LEVEL 1 using SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM.  In order to get to AWARENESS LEVEL 1 we must employ NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.

 

These two problems are really the same problem of the DUMBING DOWN effect of BINARY LOGIC. For example in dealing with the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT of the female accommodating/enabling (wave) conjugate and the LOCAL and EXPLICIT of the male asserting/actualizing conjugate, as Vygotsky points out, PIAGET makes the mistake of DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate but IT CAN”T BE DROPPED OUT because it is the female aspect of a CONJUGATE RELATION and the ‘opposing conjugates’ (or are they complementary conjugates) only exist as an internally complementing unity.

 

In simple terms, if LIBERALS and CONSERVATIVES BOTH UPGRADE FROM BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM to NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM, their SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC OPPOSITION will be SUBSUMED by LESS SIMPLE NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.

 

Plato clearly distinguished between Heraclitus’ SIMULTANEOUS unity and plurality of the cosmos and Empedocles’ SEPARATE PERIODS OF Love and Strife.  At the same time, they are mentioned together as both alike  in believing in the unity and plurality of the cosmos; and Aristotle’s coupling of the two might conceivably have been motivated by the Platonic comparison, the important distinction between them being overlooked.” -Kirk, Raven et al, The Prosocratic Philosophers.

 

What I am saying is that BINARY LOGIC is too simple to capture the nuances of NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM

 

The UNDERSTANDING of HOW PEOPLE DIVIDE INTO CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL AND OTHER FACTIONS DIFFERS DEPENDING ON WHETHER THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE IS WESTERN CULTURE OR INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL.

 

Erich Jantsch’s understanding of divisions based on AWARENESS LEVELS seems to make more sense than the Scientific American cited investigation into the dividing into CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL categories based on individual social relationships wherein; “conservativism” as a general tendency to resist change and tolerate social inequality. “Liberalism” means a tendency to embrace change and reject inequality.   

 

 

Erich Jantsch’s THREE LEVELS of AWARENESS EXPLAIN the divisions between CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS and EXPLAIN also, the DIVISION between WESTERN CULTURE and INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURE.   I can include here a short definition of the THREE LEVELS to show how we (the overall social collective) can become DIVIDED by a focus on one or the other of the TWO LOWEST LEVELS OF AWARENESS.  The HIGHEST LEVEL 1  of the 3 LEVELS is actually an INTEGRATION of levels 2 and 3 while level 2 includes within it level 3.

 

LEVEL 1  AWARENESS is like the indigenous aboriginal understanding ‘everything is related’ since we are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

 

LEVEL 2 AWARENESS is like the LIBERAL understanding wherein we acknowledge that all INDIVIDUALS and all NATIONS are INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT hence COOPERATION makes sense.

 

LEVEL 3 AWARENESS is like the CONSERVATIVE  EGO-based INDEPENDENCE and ‘survival of the fittest’ understanding wherein COMPETING TO WIN will cultivate strength/capability and overall supremacy.

 

Modern physics AFFIRMS the LEVEL 1 AWARENESS which supports our understanding that we are like STRANDS IN A WEB so that when things go WRONG AS IN VIOLENCE, the VIOLENCE of a STRAND in the WEB is NOT LOCALLY AUTHORED by the STRAND since the STRANDS are ANIMATED by the WEB  (material forms are condensations of the all-including energy-charged PLENUM).

 

 

Jantsch’s understanding, which explains actual physical behaviour (the combining of logic, perception and behaviour shaped by the former) is affirmable in our sense-experience grounded reality.  It is enlightening in this regard to reflect on the UPLIFT we get in going from simple BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM (e.g. empty space medium) to NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM (e.g. where ‘space’ is NOT EMPTY as Bohm points out, but is an ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM within which there are CONDENSATIONS which we WESTERN CULTURE FOLKS have had the habit of understanding as INDEPENDENT MATERIAL OBJECTS which are the ACTIVE ELEMENTS moving about and interacting within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, in which case OUR LANGUAGE NEEDS ONLY TO DESCRIBE THE ACTIVITY of the MATERIAL OBJECTS and TO CONSIDER THIS TO BE “THE FULL STORY”.

 

As the READER can see, this here (my) philosophical exploration, like those of Bohm and others, sees the NEED (from the point of view of trying to understand physical reality) FOR LANGUAGE THAT GOES BEYOND THE SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM CAPABILITY, such as the NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of… NOT THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM BUT THE “INCLUDING MEDIUM”.  This LESS SIMPLE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME wherein we NO LONGER CONSIDER SPACE AS “EMPTY” BUT AS “FULL” in the sense that it is an ENERGY-FLIELD within which its CONDENSATIONS are those things we have been calling MATERIAL OBJECTS in which case, the MOVEMENT of these MATERIAL OBJECTS is bound in the DYNAMICS of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM and THOSE DYNAMICS are ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION.

 

NOW, IN THIS CASE, AS WE CAN SEE, THE CONDENSATIONS are SECONDARY INCLUSIONS WITHIN THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING PLENUM WHEREIN ‘EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, INCLUDING THE CONDENSATIONS, IN WHICH CASE THE LANGUAGE WE ARCHITECT TO CAPTURE WHAT IS GOING ON IS GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE A FLUID FOUNDATION TO SUPPORT THE OVERALL TRANSFORMATION WHEREIN THE MATERIAL FORMS ARE SECONDARY CONDENSATIONS.

 

IN THIS CASE, WE KNOW THAT IF WE ARCHITECT A LANGUAGE THAT GIVES FOUNDATIONAL STATUS TO MATERIAL FORMS, THE STORIES WE TELL “WILL BE OBLIGED TO DOWNPLAY AND OBSCURE THE PRIMARY ROLE OF THE TRANSFORMING PLANUM” because any statement we make that speaks of the motion or growth or development or productive acts of A CONDENSATION is going to MISREPRESENT WHAT IS REALLY OCCURRING WHICH IS THE TRANSFORMING OF THE OVERALL PLENUM IN WHICH THE CONDENSATIONS ARE, AS SCHROEDINGER HAS POINTED OUT, “SCHAUMKOMMEN” (APPEARANCE).

 

WE KNOW THAT PHILOSOPHICAL MATHEMATICIAN-PHYSICISTS or  MATHEMATICAL-PHYSICIST-PHILOSOPHERS LIKE STEPHANE LUPASCO have developed BEYOND-BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES NEEDED for describing our sense-experience in a world that is intrinsically more complex than can be treated of (linguistically conceptualized) with SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC.  As this AI description describes;

 

The concept of a “both/and logic of the including medium” is a specific philosophical or communications theory term, not a universally recognized historical category for classifying societies. It is not possible to give a precise number of historical societies that have developed this concept, as it refers to a particular way of interpreting logic and reality, often contrasted with Western “either/or” (binary) logic. 

The “both/and logic of the including medium” is associated with specific philosophical and cultural perspectives: 

  • Eastern Thought: Many scholars note that Eastern philosophies, particularly those related to Yin-Yang dialectics, Buddhism, and Jain logic, embrace a “both/and” or dialectical approach that accepts contradiction and paradox, in contrast to the traditional Western emphasis on the law of non-contradiction and the excluded middle, derived from Aristotelian logic.
  • Specific Thinkers/Theories: The specific phrase “both/and logic of the including medium” appears in the work of contemporary thinkers like the Franco-Romanian philosopher Stéphane Lupasco and subsequent theorists who discuss nonbinary, wave-field relations in physical reality. It is also discussed in the context of:
    • Communication Studies: The analog (both/and) logic of human subjects is seen as synthesizing with the digital (either/or) logic of objects in interactive practices like video games.
    • Sociology and Psychology: The “both/and” approach is used as a framework for understanding social hybridity, pluralism, and paradoxes in management studies, where multiple viewpoints or seemingly contradictory elements are held simultaneously. 

Therefore, rather than a specific number of societies, the “both/and” logic represents a different type of cultural or philosophical reasoning that has been identified in a broad category of non-Western cultures and in various modern theoretical frameworks across different academic disciplines.

 

Personally, in my own studies in actual practical work in seismology (seismic imagining), like many others, one runs into a real need for a LOGIC that is LESS SIMPLE than simple BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM.  For example, as soon as one accepts, even on a trial basis, that as Bohm says; “Space is not empty.  It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” (Bohm). 

 

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE DEVELOPED (have ‘grown up in’ and ‘have been intellectually conditioned/influenced by’ our use of LANGUAGE that employs a SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC base which has been pushed into our language everywhere.  At Nietzsche observes, we have built it into the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR; e.g. “THE TOWN IS GROWING” .  That implies that “THE TOWN” is a SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT THING IN ITSELF with “ITS OWN POWERS OF GROWING and DEVELOPING”.   

 

BINARY LOGIC IS FOUND IN QUESTIONS SUCH AS ‘IS THE TOWN BIGGER THIS YEAR THAN LAST?’   Once we USE such questions that IMPOSE BEING by way of NAMING, and get answers, we get STUCK IN THAT TOO-SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM “BEING”-based approach to REPRESENTATION.   How do we get from there to dealing with issues such as “WHAT IS THE EXTENT OF THE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS AND LOSS OF RARE SPECIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS THAT IS CONJUGATE WITH THE GROWTH of the TOWN, and how do these developments combine in the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE?  The TRICKY POINT here is that the WE ARE NOT DEALING WITH THE SIMPLE SUM OF THE PARTS of “GROWTH OF THE TOWN” and “SHRINKING OF THE WHILDERNESS” because those living in the region, since they are INCLUDED in what is, overall, a TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE, will have SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION in the overall TRANSFORMING REALITY.

 

THE MINER’S CANARY AND THE STRAND IN THE WEB

 

DID THE CANARY BECOME VIOLENT OR NOT?  This simple BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM does not consider the case where the MEDIUM IS TOXIC  (and perhaps invisibly so) in which case the BEHAVIOUR of the CANARY is not simply deriving from its internal sourcing but is inductively shapes by the AMBIENT CONDITIONS THE CANARY HAS ENTERED INTO or which have COME TO ENCLOSE HIM by changing wind direction.  IN other words, the SOURCE of the VIOLENT BEHAVIOUR is AMBIENT and NOT INTERNAL.   This is the general case when our understanding is that “Space is not empty.  It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” (Bohm). 

 

IN THIS CASE THE APPROPRIATE LOGIC IS THE LESS SIMPLE “BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM” which inquires BEYOND BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM.  The influence of an ambient condition can source changes in behaviour that are EXTERNALLY rather than INTERNALLY sourced..   The MINERS “know better” than to say “THESE CANARIES ARE SICK, TAKE THEM TO THE HOSPITAL”, they instead say, THESE SENSITIVE BIRDS ARE TELLING US THAT OUR ENVIRONMENT HAS BECOME TOXIC AND WE NEED TO GET OURSELVES AS WELL AS THE CANARIES “OUT OF THERE”.

 

THE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS AND THE STRAND IN THE WEB.

 

DID RED CROW BECOME VIOLENT OR NOT?  In indigenous aboriginal culture, the STRAND IN THE WEB STRUCTURE IS THE FOUNDATIONAL UNDERSTANDING IN WHICH CASE WHEN AN INDIVIDUAL MANIFESTS VIOLENCE, THE UNDERSTANDING IS THAT HE IS VENTING TENSIONS THAT HAVE BUILT UP ON THE WEB (the social relational collective) IN WHICH CASE THE REMEDY IS TO RESOLVE THE TENSIONS IN THE WEB AND NOT TO “KILL THE MESSENGER” (the STRAND through which the TENSIONS ARE VIOLENTLY VENTING).  This is why JUSTICE in indigenous culture is RESTORATIVE rather than, as in WESTERN CULTURE, PURIFICATIONIST (SHOOT THE MESSENGER) based.

 

WE CAN SEE HOW THE WESTERN CULTURE IS MAKING A MISTAKE HERE.  IT IS BY APPLYING TOO SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC TO SITUATIONS THAT IN GENERAL REQUIRE THE LESS SIMPLE NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the social collective is the INCLUDING MEDIUM and the INDIVIDUAL is akin to a STRAND IN THE WEB wherein the STRANDS are INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT in which case the VIOLENCE of the VIOLENT STRAND is a reaction to the TOXICITY (TENSIONING UP) OF THE WEB where the SOURCE of the OUTBURST of VIOLENCE THROUGH THE STRAND, IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT (RELATIONAL) since the STRANDS in the WEB are INERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT.

 

IN GENERAL, THE INDIVIDUAL THAT IS MANIFESTING VIOLENT ACTION IS THE VENT FOR THE RELEASE OF TENSIONS THAT HAVE BUILT IN THE WEB (social collective) AND IS NOT THE “LOCAL SOURCE” OF THE VIOLENCE (the SOURCE IS NONLOCALAND IMPLICIT [relational, deriving from the web]).

 

The IMPORTANCE of AMBIENT INFLUENCE is evident in the anecdote of the Miner’s Canary and in the STRANDS-IN-THE-WEB UNDERSTANDING SUPPORTING RESTORATIVE JUSTICE which likewise acknowledges that the VIOLENCE that VENTS through an individual in the social collective DOES NOT ORIGINATE WITHIN THAT INDIVIDUAL since that individual is but a STRAND IN THE WEB that while it may serve as the VENT for a VIOLENT RELEASE of the BUILDUP of TENSIONAL ENERGY, is NOT THE AUTHORING SOURCE, IS NOT THE AUTHORING SOURCE of the VIOLENCE. 

 

The SOCIAL-RELATIONAL WEB of COMMUNITY IS A STORAGE TANK FOR AN ACCUMULATING or BUILDING UP of TENSIONS which operates in a ONE-TO-MANY LOADING ACTION and a MANY-TO-ONE UNLOADING ACTION.  That is, the MEMBERS OF A CROWD WHO WITNESS A PERSON SHOOTING AN INNOCENT INDIVIDUAL is a powerful EVENT EMOTIONALLY EXPERIENCED BY MANY PEOPLE  (many-to-one)  and can be a “STORAGE TANK FOR ANGER ENERGY” that may have a ‘hair trigger’ with POTENTIAL for VIOLENT MANY-TO-ONE TARGETED DISCHARGE, as is COMMON in WESTERN CULTURE DUE TO THE MISTAKEN BELIEF THAT WE ARE “INDEPENDENT BEINGS WITH OUR OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS” (NOTE THAT THIS FALSE UNDERSTANDING THAT OBSCURES AND DENIES THE INTERCONNECTION AND INTERDEPENDENCE OF MEMBERS OF THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE “SETS THE STAGE FOR SCAPEGOATING THE IDENTIFIED EVIL OF A VIOLENT VENTING”.  This MISTAKEN INTERPRETATION DERIVES FROM THE “DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR” (pointed out by Nietzsche) which imputes the notion of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development WHERE THERE IS NO SUCH THING.  That is, as pointed out above, in the STRAND in the WEB understanding, the LOCAL, EXPLICIT STRAND THAT MANIFESTS VIOLENCE is the CONDUIT of VIOLENT ENERGY GATHERING WITHIN THE WEB that while such VIOLENT ENERGY “VENTS” THROUGH that particular STRAND, is NOT AUTHORED BY THAT STRAND.  As we know from observing the dynamics of STRANDS IN A WEB, wherein the ‘three body problem’ prevails (“the impossibility of calculating the individual movements of three or more bodies [strands] moving under one-another’s simultaneous mutual influence”,  the VIOLENT STRAND is in no way the LOCAL AUTHOR OF THEIR VIOLENCE.

 

This UNDERSTANDING that the VIOLENT STRAND is in no way the LOCAL AUTHOR OF THEIR VIOLENCE is a correct understanding according to MODERN PHYSICS with its NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.  This BOTH/AND LOGIC is the logic that reminds us that the INCLUDING MEDIUM aka the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM is the PRIMARY AUTHORING AGENCY (it is the wave-field which is the source of material condensations).  The PRIMARY AUTHORING AGENCY IS THUS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) rather than LOCAL and EXPLICIT.   As Schroedinger and Bohm point out, the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is SCHAUMKOMMEN (APPEARANCE).  While the indigenous aboriginal with his flow-based language will speak in the NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM terms of “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS speak in the BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM terms (goodbye to miner’s canary understandings) of ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’.  While this is the popular way of speaking in our WESTERN CULTURE social intercourse, it is ABSTRACT, INCOMPLETE and FRAGMENTATIVE and while it concentrates on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (which is Schaumkommen aka Appearance), it FAILS TO ACKNOWLEDGE the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT which in MODERN PHYSICS as also in INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL culture, the PRIMARY REALITY (i.e. the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT is the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which the CONDENSATIONS that we know as LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORMS are SECONDARY “APPEARANCE”).

 

INTUITIVELY, we acknowledge the correctness of the indigenous aboriginal understanding and language design which puts the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING) into its natural primacy over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, however, WESTERN CULTURE HAS ALREADY CONCRETIZED THE VERY OPPOSITE DESIGN.  Vygotaky has pointed out that Piaget has been one among many that have PROMOTED this UPSIDE DOWN mistaken elevating of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT to PRIMARY REALITY STATUS while not simple DEMOTING the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT but “TOSSING OUT THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT”.  Vygotsky points out that Piaget does this by encouraging WESTERN CULTURE EDUCATION to promote the teaching of language in LOCAL and EXPLICIT terms and DROPPING OUT the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT so that the focus is on “THE TOWN IS GROWING” which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT without mention of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (the WILDERNESS IS SHRINKING).

 

* * * * * * *

 

I believe there is sufficient information in this short essay, to convey the proposition that WESTERN CULTURE IS SCREWING UP by our INVERTING of the NATURAL ORDER where the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) serves as the FOUNDATION for the LOCAL and EXPLICIT and ARE INSTEAD, promoting the LOCAL and EXPLICIT to PRIMARY STATUS in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME.

 

WHAT THIS MISTAKE DEMOTING of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT does is to completely CAST OUT OUR WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate BECAUSE IT NO LONGER HAS ANY PLACE TO FIT IN and it has thus become the DEA ABSCONDITA (Goddess in hiding) while we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “MAKE DO” with a LANGUAGE that we have STRIPPED DOWN TO A SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM BASE, in which case we are UNABLE TO ARTICULATE the WAVE-based phenomena of our sense-experience of inclusion therein, because such LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING CAPABILITY WE NEED has the NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM capability; e.g. “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” as is available in indigenous aboriginal STRAND-IN-THE-WEB linguistic conceptualizing structures which DO HAVE the BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM capability.  For example, the STRAND is “BOTH” itself “AND” the WEB it is included in, in which case we cannot JUDGE the STRAND as if it were the full and sole AUTHOR of its own behaviour..  The alternative, in the face of not being able to isolate the SOURCE of the dynamic of the local, explicit, individual STRAND (which is meanwhile interconnected and interdependent with the matrix of strands of the web), is to FORGOT ABOUT ASSIGNING CREDIT OR BLAME FROM THE ERUPTION OF VIOLENCE OR RESONANCE and to instead develop a RESTORATIVE JUSTICE which is NOT PURIFICATIONIST (seeking to identify, locate and eliminate a notional LOCAL AUTHOR of violence) but a JUSTICE that orients to the re-establishing of relational harmony throughout the WEB.  This commonly involves the HEALING CIRCLE approach WHICH DOES NOT SEEK TO IDENTIFY “PERPETRATORS” AND TO PUNISH AND/OR ELIMINATE THEM BECAUSE, AS POGO SAYS, IN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE, WE HAVE MET THE ENEMY AND IT IS US.

 

WHY CAN’T WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “GO THERE?” (to RESTORATIVE JUSTICE)

 

WESTERN CULTURE, AS NIETZSCHE POINTS OUT, IS HUNG UP ON THE NOTION OF INDEPENDENT BEINGS WITH NOTIONAL POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.  THIS IS TOTALLY FALSE AS FAR AS SENSE-EXPERIENCE IS CONCERNED, WHICH ENDORSES THE UNDERSTANDING OF INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE of MODERN PHYSICS and of STRANDS-IN-THE-WEB of INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS (and similar understandings of Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents).  “LOCAL AUTHORING” is ABSTRACTION given by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR e.g. “DONALD TRUMP AUTHORED THIS”.  While it may be LOGICALLY TRUE, IT IS PHYSICALLY INCOMPLETE and thus UNREAL.  THE RELATIONAL DYNAMICS of the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION THEREIN, are beyond the simplified, one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING linguistic conceptualizing rhetoric popularly employed in WESTERN CULTURE.   Donald Trump may focus his remarks on the precision attack on Venezuela but as Goedel’s theorem reminds us should remind us, all finite logical propositions are INCOMPLETE, and the PROPOSITION that claims to report on the U.S. attach on VENEZUELA, in spite of being TRUE, is NOT REAL and the REALITY is that we share inclusion in the all-including TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM and exactly how the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM we all share inclusion in … IS GOING TO CONTINUE TO PLAY OUT, … is BEYOND OUR KEN, but it is REAL, and when we feel a reaction in our gut to TRUMP’S MOVES which says; HE HAS REALLY FUCKED THINGS UP THIS TIME, we are referring to how the REALREALITY of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM WE SHARE INCLUSION IN, IS GOING TO PLAY OUT GIVEN THE SHIT-KICKING ARE GIVING TO IT IN THE PRESENT.

 

WE KNOW THAT THE ONGOING TRANSFORMATION WE SHARE INCLUSION IN CAN TAKE A TURN THAT MAY MAKE LIFE DIFFICULT FOR OUR CHILDREN OR FOR THE SIX GENERATIONS OUT that indigenous aboriginals like to be focused on trying to protect for the little one’s still in the earth.  In other words, it may do EGO of TRUMP and the U.S. MILITARY GOOD to savour the impressive LOCAL, EXPLICIT military action results (current results) of the attack on Venezuela, but how many of those did the German and Italian military of 1939 get to celebrate?   Military victories can be like SEX which can feel great in the moment but can spawn illness that can rot one’s innards over time and kill one’s partners, and children.

 

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL PROPONENTS OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE MAY ALSO GO TO WAR WITH ONE ANOTHER, BUT THERE IS THE MODERATING UNDERSTANDING OF MITAKUYE OYASIN (WE ARE ALL RELATED).  In this case, PEACE can only means relational resonance in the web of interconnections and interdependencies, NOT a PURIFICATIONIST ELIMINATING OF THE BAD ONES TO THE POINT THAT ONLY THE GOOD ONES (DONALD AND HIS BUDDIES?) WILL REMAIN..

 

* * * *

 

HOW the ONGOING FEUD BETWEEN CONSERVATIVES AND LIBERALS IS POSTPONING ITS RESOLUTION