An inclusional worldview
The “REAL MEANING” that is accessed in Modern Physics and in Indigenous Aborigininal Culture
In speaking of the The “REAL MEANING” that is accessed in Modern Physics and in Indigenous Aborigininal Culture, I am going in REAL DEEP, to the understanding level of indigenous aboriginals the Modern physics mode of understanding. In this mode of understanding, we do NOT simply except, as ‘reality’, the one-sided concept of male asserting/actualizing such as “the town is growing” but instead acknowledge TRANSFORMING OF THE OVERALL LANDSCAPE which includes, at the same time, the SHRINKING of wilderness. This is consistent with indigenous aboriginal language (which flow-based) and Modern physics (Bohm’s ‘rheomode’ language).
What we have to look at in this case is REALITY as affirmed by our sense-experience which is the reality of inclusion in CONTINUING RELATIONAL TRANSFORMATION. Our PROPOSITION that ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’, while TRUE is INCOMPLETE (Goedel’s Theorem says that all finite LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS are INCOMPLETE), and the REALITY lies beyond the INCOMPLETE TRUTH; i.e. that the LANDSCAPE is TRANSFORMING, and this is supported by a NONBINARY form of LOGIC; i.e. the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM which we ACKNOWLEDGE that when the TOWN is GROWING, the LANDSCAPE is TRANSFORMING since what is also occurring is the SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS. This understanding of TRANSFORMATION is supported by our SENSE-EXPERIENCE while it is ABSTRACTION for us to speak ONLY of the GROWTH of the TOWN, which, like Elon Musk’s “LAUNCHING OF A ROCKET” or CONSTRUCTION of a MANUFACTURING PLANT which mentions only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING actions and FAILS TO MENTION of WHAT IS REALLY OCCURRING which is TRANSFORMATION that includes NOT ONLY WHAT IS GAINED BUT WHAT IS LOST in the conjugate process of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING (e.g. the loss of diversity and natural complexity that is part of the VIRGIN LANDSCAPE).
As Schroedinger points out, the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING component, which is the LOCAL and EXPLICIT PART of what is happening which is certainly NOT the FULL STORY (it fails to acknowledge the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT conjugate LOSS). That is, the LOCAL and EXPLICIT development such as the GROWTH of the TOWN is ONLY superficial “APPEARANCE” aka “SHAUMKOMMEN”, which DROPS OUT MENTION of the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS, which, together with the GROWTH of the TOWN, constitutes TRANSFORMATION of the landscape.
The REAL MEANING of an event IS IN THE TRANSFORMATION IT BRINGS ABOUT, which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (wherein the overall reality is transformed) rather than THE EVENT in its LOCAL and EXPLICIT ASPECT which WESTERNC CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based THINKING will ASSESS as EITHER GOOD OR BAD WHICH FAILS TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE REAL IMPACT which is the TRANSFORMATIONAL ASPECT: For example, YES, the TOWN DID GROW LARGER, and this is undeniably GOOD NEWS for INVESTORS, THE ECONOMY and for HUMANS IN NEED OF ACCOMMODATIONS AND SUPPORT SERVICES, but it is NOT ALL THAT HAPPENED because the REAL ACTION, meaning overall action is TRANSFORMATION that includes the LOSS OF WILDERNESS with its valuable and important (to overall systemic conditions) DIVERSITY.
WESTERN CULTURE, although NOT Modern physics and NOT indigenous aboriginals, has developed the HABIT of using DUMBED DOWN LANGUAGE wherein one speaks ONLY OF THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN, while DROPPING OUT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of the CONJUGATE LOSS OF WILDERNESS DIVERSITY, as in one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PROPOSITIONS (let’s not forget the incompleteness of all finite logical propositions). LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZINGS such as THE TOWN IS GROWING, while TRUE in the LIMITED SENSE of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite logical propositions, is NOT CAPTURING REALITY because what is REALLY HAPPENING is TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE which includes A WHOLE LOT OF STUFF GOING MISSING as in the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate that is EVER-PRESENT wherever there is MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING. SO, as just stated “WESTERN CULTURE, although NOT Modern physics and NOT indigenous aboriginals, has developed the HABIT of using DUMBED DOWN LANGUAGE wherein one speaks ONLY OF THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN, while DROPPING OUT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of the CONJUGATE LOSS OF WILDERNESS DIVERSITY.
This notion of GROWTH (which is NOT GROWTH but TRANSFORMATION) is, in WESTERN CULTURE, THE ORGANIZING INFLUENCE that is shaping the behaviours of the WESTERN CULTURE social collective by way of an ECONOMY that fuelled by INVESTORS and DEVELOPERS and BUILDERS and BUYERS whose ACTIVITIES are COORDINATED by the ONE-SIDED PURSUIT OF GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of material assets, WHICH FAILS TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE REALITY OF WHAT IS REALLY OCCURRING which is TRANSFORMATION in which WE ALL SHARE INCLUSION, including the indigenous aboriginals and Modern physics gurus like David Bohm and F. David Peat who “PREACH” about the FOLLY of doing such, while WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, proceed, with the “BIT IN THEIR TEETH” to PERPETUATE THIS SOCIAL RELATIONAL DYSFUNCTION, … a DYSFUNCTION that persists as a dominant group of people (the WESTERN CULTURE GROUP OF PEOPLE) focus ONE-SIDEDLY on GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION while leaving to FLAP LIKE A LOOSE SAIL IN THE BREEZE, the TRANSFORMATION that is the PRIMARY REALITY.
Bohm tried his best, together with his associated F. David Peat, to WARN US, … WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS who are PUSHING this orientation to GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION… “OUT OF THE CONTEXT OF THE REALITY THAT WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON IS TRANSFORMATION”. The FRAGMENTATION that Bohm IS WARNING US ABOUT is coming OUR USE OF LANGUAGE (linguistic conceptualizing) that “DROPS OUT” acknowledgement of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING (e.g. the SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS that occurs together with [in conjugate relation with]) that TOGETHER WITH the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, CO-CONSTITUTES “TRANSFORMATION”. So, WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have fallen into the dysfunctional practice of FRAGMENTING WHAT WE TAKE TO BE REALITY by speaking in the ONE-SIDED ONLY TERMS MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING by using the LOGICALLY POSITIVE BUT INCOMLETE concepts of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION and OBSCURING IN THE PROCESS, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, AGING and COLLAPSE of prior construction, and the CONSUMPTION of PRODUCTION, this combination of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZATIONS together with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate, CO-CONSTITUTING “TRANSFORMATION” of the overall LANDSCAPE.
The WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that DUMBS DOWN TRANSFORMATION to one-sided GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION (all of which are ONE-SIDED, UNREAL ABSTRACTIONS) is now SHAPING the dynamics of WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES which is “THE SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION”. Bohm has pointed this out as follows;
1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order, David Bohm, 1980)
The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and Wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.
Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.
WHEN WE SEE TRUMP AND/OR MUSK (and WESTERN CULTURE GAME-PLAYERS IN GENERAL) USE THEIR POLITICAL and FINANCIAL POWERS to LAUNCH CHANGE INITIATIVES IN A ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING MANNER, WHAT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING IS NOT WHAT IS BEING TALKED ABOUT (how we are formulating our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZTIONS) IN ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING TERMS OF GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, … WHILE WHAT IS ACTUALLY OCCURRING INCLUDES THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, the COMBINATION being the “REAL REALITY” which is TRANSFORMATION.
The “FRAGMENTATION” which fuels so much social dysfunction in WESTERN CULTURE derives from the WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME wherein there is a DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate. While the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate captures the LOCAL and EXPLICIT aspects of reality, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING captures the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ASPECTS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD which facilitates INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE of the material CONDENSATIONS in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.
KEY POINT TO KEEP IN MIND: The WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that DUMBS DOWN TRANSFORMATION to one-sided GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION (all of which are ONE-SIDED, UNREAL ABSTRACTIONS) is now SHAPING the dynamics of WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES which is “THE SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION”. WE MAY SAY ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ but our SENSE-EXPERIENCE is informing us that “TOWNING” is a DEVELOPING that is INCLUDED WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” and “THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A TOWN-THING-IN-ITSELF WITH ITS OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ITS OWN GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT”. SUCH FRAGMENTED ABSTRACTION DERIVES FROM, as Nietzsche points out, THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR where one may say “THE TOWN IS GROWING” without mentioning the conjugate SHRINKING of WILDERNESS, since this has been implicitly REPLACED with an abstract ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.
This is where the FRAGMENTATION is COMING FROM and it is SUPPORTED by simple BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM (i.e. by the substituting of EMPTY SPACE in place of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM). WHAT IS NEEDED FOR ADEQUATE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM as is employed in Modern physics and as well in indigenous aboriginal linguistic conceptualizing; e.g. where the STRAND IN THE WEB describes a reality wherein MATERIAL FORMS are INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT (hence indigenous aboriginal RESTORATIVE JUSTICE), which NEVER GETS BOGGED DOWN IN THE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS such as MATERIAL OBJECTS THAT HAVE AN INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE AND PURPORTEDLY MOVE ABOUT AND INTERACT IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, as leads to WESTERN CULTURE PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE.
As the Anishinabe say, in there real world of our sense-experience, there is no place for BINARY LOGIC, which in WESTERN CULTURE is the source of DIVISION and FRAGMENTATION;
“At the core of our spiritual beings we make no artificial distinction between the sacred and the profane. Unlike Western culture, we have not suffered through that artificial separation”
According to Tomoko Masuzawa, any cosmology without a sacred–profane binary was rendered invisible by the field of religious studies, privileging Christianity [and Islam and Judaism] at the expense of non-Christian systems because the binary was supposed to be “universal”, –Wikipedia
We can take such understanding and apply it in an investigation of WESTERN CULTURE POLITICS.
* * * * * * *
We know that TRUMP is totally OFF THE WALL in his INTERPRETATION and RESPONSE to many events and in his first 279 days in office, he has put a lot of actions in motion. In Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal culture, not only is one aware of being included in an all-including TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM wherein our actions as INDIVIDUALS and/or as NATIONS are MIXED IN WITH THE TRANSFORMING FLOW we are included. As we know from driving in a mass of vehicles in the heavy FREEWAY FLOW, while we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are in the habit of TALKING as if WE KNOW WHAT WE ARE DOING, or that TRUMP KNOWS WHAT HE IS DOING, that is a FALSE IMPRESSION that is common to WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT but NOT to indigenous aboriginals and Modern physics where there is an understanding that EVERYTHING IS RELATED, meaning INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT as in a relational flow, so that whoever precisely we DESCRIBE OUR ACTIONS, this knowledge and precision of ‘what we do’ is NOT REAL because what is REAL is that we are all sharing inclusion in the transforming relational continuum.
That is, we live in a world that is undergoing continual TRANSFORMATION where everything is in flux including ourselves! We are CONDENSATIONS in the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED TRANSFORMING PLENUM. As Goedel’s Theorem reminds us, all of our LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS are INCOMPLETE which is why indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents are using FLOW-BASED (VERB-BASED) linguistic conceptualizations based on the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational), avoiding dependency of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT that comes with WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing which employs NAMING-instantiated MATERIAL BEINGS, notionally with “their own” powers of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments. This FRAGMENTED PSEUDO-REALITY supports a simple form of pictorial communicating such as ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’ which FALLS SHORT OF BEING ABLE TO CAPTURE “TRANSFORMATION”.
Bohm’s ‘Rheomode language’, and the indigenous aboriginal languages are FLOW-BASED wherein the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT dynamic of TRANSFORMATION plays the foundational role. Since everything is in continuing transformative flux, there are no BEING-BASED MATERIAL OBJECTS, but as we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS know, have a habit of VISUALIZING WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, ‘formings’ such as ‘wavings’ that are DYNAMIC FEATURES WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM, that, even though they are relational features within the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM, can be notionally BROKEN INTO SEPARATE FRAGMENTS, so that our linguistic conceptualizing is NO LONGER capturing that TRANSFORMING that is actually going on, but LOCKS ON to WHAT APPEARS TO BE AN ELONGATE MOUNDING OF WATER paired up with a closely following RAVINING. While these elongate “hill and dale” lineages APPEAR to have lateral motion, when we see them encounter flotsam in the water, instead of pushing the flotsam along with them, they simply lift it up and drop it down, showing us that WHAT APPEARS to be ELONGATE MOUNDS and RAVINES that are LATERALLY MOVING are only just that, “APPEARANCE”.
SO, THERE ARE NO “LOCAL AND EXPLICIT THINGS THAT ARE MOVING” (that is just APPEARANCE), there is only TRANSFORMATION of the overall LANDSCAPE which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).
WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have developed the habit of making a DOUBLE ERROR HERE, the first error is that of NAMING and thus WRONGLY promoting the notional existence of LOCAL, EXPLICIT, INDEPENDENT material objects, and at the same time(and this the SECOND ERROR) DROPPING OUT the existence of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT energy charged PLENUM (and instead, BACKFILLING with ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE).
* * * * * * *
The REAL MEANING of TRUMP and the REAGAN video TV AD posted by Ontario Premier DOUG FORD, is that we live in a world that is a TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM while our WESTERN CULTURE habit has us employ, as our operative reality, one of TWO POLAR OPPOSITE PSEUDO-REALITIES based on the LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS aka the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR. E.g. the CONSERVATIVE view wherein the hurricane stirs up the atmosphere, … or the LIBERAL view wherein the atmosphere stirs up the hurricane. MISSING from both of these is LEVEL 1, the HIGHEST LEVEL of AWARENESS wherein we understand that SOLAR IRRADIANCE is the source of BOTH the hurricane stirring up the atmosphere AND the atmosphere stirring up the hurricane. Instead of THINKING in terms of LOCAL and EXPLICIT AUTHORSHIP (the source of FRAGMENTATION), we may INSTEAD THINK in terms of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT AUTHORSHIP which GOES BY THE NAME “TRANSFORMATION”.
POLARIZING DISAGREEMENT impacts BOTH CONSERVATIVES and LIBERALS and constrains them to the TWO LOWEST LEVELS OF AWARENESS of our THREE LEVELS of WARENESS (Jantsch).
The LOWEST LEVELS OF AWARENESS (Awareness level 3 and Awareness level 2) ARE POLAR OPPOSITES and it is only by way of SUSPENDING our MISTAKEN IMPRESSION that such a thing as LOCAL AUTHORING IS POSSIBLE (“LOCAL AUTHORING” is the abstract artefact of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR), but IN WESTERN CULTURE, this MISTAKEN IMPRESSION is SECURED IN PLACE by EGO which does NOT want to LET GO OF BELIEF in LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and DEVELOPMENTS, and the CREDIT and BLAME that comes with it.
LEVEL 1 AWARENESS of INCLUSION in the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM CAN ONLY BE REACHED BY DROPPING OUT OF THE POLARIZING DISPUTE OF CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL POLITICS which is based on LOCAL AUTHORING and HOW BEST TO DO IT; i.e. the CONSERVATIVE LEVEL 3 AWARENESS WAY which comprehends MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as in “THE HURRICANE STIRS UP THE ATMOSPHERE”, … OR, the LIBERAL LEVEL 2 AWARENESS which comprehends FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING as in “THE ATMOSPHERE STIRS UP THE HURRICANE”.
ACCESS TO LEVEL 1 AWARENESS comes by REJECTING the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR that is supporting the NOTION of LOCAL AUTHORING thus OPENING THE DOOR TO ACCESS THE HIGHEST OF THE THREE LEVELS OF AWARENESS, the AWARENESS OF THE NATURAL PRIMACY OF THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM WHEREIN WE (MATERIAL FORMS) ARE CONDENSATIONS IN WHICH CASE WE ARE INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT.
WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE EVIDENTLY “NOT READY” TO “LET GO OF” BELIEF IN OUR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING (which implies that we are INDEPENDENT BEINGS OPERATING IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE as we have built into our linguistic conceptualizing scheme), and ACCEPTING, as in MODERN PHYSICS and as in INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURE, that WE ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (STRANDS IN THE WEB) IN WHICH CASE WE ARE INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT. In this case, there is no such thing as LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development and thus no support for WESTERN CULTURE PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE that REWARDS AND PROLIFERATES LOCAL AUTHORS OF GOOD WORKS and PUNISHES AND ELIMINATES LOCAL AUTHORS OF BAD WORKS. INSTEAD, there is support for RESTORATIVE JUSTICE wherein OUTBURSTS OF VIOLENCE are understood as DISSONANCE within the INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT STRANDS-IN-THE-WEB social matrix, the remedy for which is RESTORATIVE; i.e. the use of HEALING CIRCLES to re-cultivate the social relational RESONANCE that has become DISSONANT. This is an UNDERSTANDING of social dynamics in relational terms which does NOT DEPEND ON THE ABSTRACT NOTION OF INDEPENDENT BEINGS NOTIONALLY WITH “THEIR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT” AS GIVEN BY “THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR”.
WHAT WOULD DONALD TRUMP OR JOE BIDEN AND WESTERN CULTURE IN GENERAL SAY ABOUT THIS?
The CONSERVATIVE-LIBERAL POLARIZATION based on DISPARATE AWARENESS OF WHAT SEEMS TO BE ‘REALITY’ CANNOT BE RESOLVED WITH BINARY LOGIC BASED “EITHER THIS UNDERSTANDING IS CORRECT OR THAT UNDERSTANDING IS CORRECT” BECAUSE BOTH VIEWS MAY BE LOGICALLY CORRECT BUT AS WITH ALL FINITE PROPOSITIONS, INNATELY INCOMPLETE, and they are INCOMPLETE IN DIFFERENT WAYS, which means that SUPPORTERS OF THESE CONFLICTING VIEWS can RIGHTFULLY CLAIM THE TRUTH OF THEIR UNDERSTANDING AND THE CORRECTNESS OF THEIR VIEWS AND THEY WILL NEVER RESOLVE THEIR DISAGREEMENT because WHILE BOTH OF THE OPPOSING VIEWS ARE CORRECT, THEY ARE BOTH INCOMPLETE.
For example, while it is TRUE that the HURRICANE STIRS UP THE ATMOSPHERE as is the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING form of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (the LOCAL AUTHORING ASSERTION), it is ALSO TRUE that the ATMOSPHERE STIRS UP THE HURRICANE as is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING form of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (the LOCAL AUTHORING ASSERTION). THESE ARE BOTH SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC BASED EITHER/OR PROPOSITIONS that address phenomena that are LINGUISTICALLY MADE OUT TO BE LOCAL and EXPLICIT, but the REAL AUTHORING phenomenon is SOLAR IRRADIANCE which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT in which case BOTH THE CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL PROPOSITIONS ARE INCOMPLETE since they give a foundational role to LOCAL and EXPLICIT ACTION; e.g. the U.S. economy led by the POWERFUL LEADER (CONSERVATIVE) or the U.S. economy led by the SOCIAL COLLECTIVE (LIBERAL) LEADER. While the stories structured in this manner can BOTH be TRUE in a BINARY LOGIC sense, they are both INCOMPLETE and there is a HIGHER ORDER (LEVEL ONE AWARENESS) understanding which is that the dynamics involved are within the GLOBAL dynamic wherein the U.S. dynamic is included. In this understanding, AUTHORING IS FOUNDATIONALLY NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT rather than LOCAL and EXPLICIT so that the POLARIZING ARGUMENT over where the AUTHORING of actions and developments should be CREDITED “DISAPPEARS” since in AWARENESS LEVEL 1 (the highest awareness level) what is going on is TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, where WHAT RUSSIA and CHINA are doing and WHAT THE USA is doing are LESSER QUESTIONS which fall short of being able to address the overall dynamic of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATION which is the PRIMARY REALITY.
* * * * * * *
TRUST ME, this is worth CHECKING OUT for ONESELF.
While our WESTERN CULTURE IS PLAGUED BY BINARY LOGIC based FRAGMENTATION as captured by Bohm in the following paragraph, WHICH ONE DOES NOT HAVE TO READ to GET to the simple point I am offering up for sharing that is WORTH CHECKING OUT because it resolves the FRAGMENTATION that is an acknowledged problem in WESTERN CULTURE, that comes from our manner of linguistic conceptualization that we commonly use to communicate and share our sense-experiences.
No need to read this paragraph by Bohm, I am just including because it flags the fact that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS do have a problem with FRAGMENTATION (just look at the REPUBLICANS and DEMOCRATS struggle with it). FRAGMENTATION is a symptom of the problem that I am going to share with you in very simple terms, below this paragraph by Bohm reminding us of WESTERN CULTURE problem of fragmentation.
… jump over these next paragraphs to get to the continuation of the deliver of the ‘this’ in the title TRUST ME, this is worth CHECKING OUT for ONESELF.
1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order, David Bohm, 1980)
The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.
Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.
* * * * * * * *
* * * THE PROBLEM and its REMEDY can be stated in simple terms where the challenge in ‘going there’ is that of ‘letting go’ of something we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE BEEN TAUGHT which is oversimplistic which we are constantly using and in so doing, BLOCKING our access to the simple REALITY. The BLOCKING PROBLEM is that we are grounding our language, thinking and understanding in BINARY LOGIC whereby we give ourselves the impression that the world dynamic is predominantly MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING which comes from our dominating use of terms such as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, wherein there is no mention of FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING which are always CONJUGATE to MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING because our world has wave-field basis wherein where the TOWN IS GROWING, the WILDERNESS is SHRINKING, and our WESTERN CULTURE HABIT is to NOT ONLY TO PUT IN PRECEDENCE the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING but to ALSO, DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ENABLING, which gives us propositions that are INCOMPLETE (as all finite binary logic based propositions are, as Goedel’s Theorem attests). So, we cannot say that “THE TOWN IS GROWING” … FULL STOP, even though this is “TRUE” because in the world of our sense-experience, such a proposition, while TRUE, is INCOMPLETE, and we would need a FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE (with both peaks and troughs) to ALSO CAPTURE “THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS” and thus the overall REALITY of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE aka TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM.
It is important, at this juncture in this discussion, to recall what our sense-experience has long informed us on, that we live a WAVE-FIELD WORLD which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have largely DROPPED OUT of our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING DISCOURSE; it would now sound OLD FASHIONED to say “To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose”, which suggests the indigenous aboriginal understanding of reality wherein we understand ourselves as being INCLUDED in something GREATER THAN OURSELVES, as in the STRAND IN THE WEB aphorism of indigenous aborginals.
This understanding is equivalent to the MODERN PHYSICS flow-based understanding of the world we are all included in, which Bohm has referred to as the RHEOMODE wherein material forms are only CONDENSATIONS of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka wave-field. What we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS SEE as MATERIAL FORMS which we think of as LOCAL and EXPLICIT are instead CONDENSATIONS of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD. Since the CONDENSATIONS in the PLENUM are all INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT through their inclusion in the ALL-INCLUDING PLENUM, this Modern physic relationship agrees with indigenous aboriginal STRANDS in the WEB relations wherein the STRANDS are INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT.
This means that because we are all STRANDS IN THE WEB, what we call “OUR ACTIONS”, the actions of A STRAND IN THE WEB, are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (RELATION) since, as STRANDS IN THE WEB, we are NOT INDEPENDENT but INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT which is why indigenous aboriginal JUSTICE is “RESTORATIVE” because the dynamics of A PARTICULAR STRAND in “THE STRANDS IN THE WEB COMPLEX” are “LOCAL AND EXPLICIT” only “APPEARANCE” (Schaumkommen).
“THERE ARE NO ‘LOCAL AUTHORS’ in the STRANDS IN THE WEB dynamic, wherein the movements of the interconnected and interdependent strands are such that the ‘THREE BODY PROBLEM’ applies (the impossibility of calculating the individual movements of three or more bodies moving under one-another’s simultaneous mutual influence). This is why indigenous aboriginal JUSTICE is RESTORATIVE JUSTICE rather than PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE of WESTERN CULTURE “INDEPENDENT BEINGS”
When there is RAPE and MURDER in indigenous aboriginal cultures, JUSTICE is RESTORATIVE rather than PURIFICATIONIST, NOT BECAUSE it is the custom of indigenous aboriginals TO BE FORGIVING but because of the understanding of the INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE of STRANDS in the WEB such as INDIVIDUALS in the SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, in which case, THERE IS NO LOCAL AUTHOR of actions and developments, whether GOOD OR BAD (those are too simple BINARY LOGIC concepts). In indigenous aboriginal understanding, as also in MODERN PHYSICS, because there is the understanding of STRANDS in the WEB, and/or CONDENSATIONS of the TRANSFORMING PLENUM wherein everything is INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT, the world is RELATIONAL and the RELATIONAL WORLD varies between relational RESONANCE and RELATIONAL DISSONANCE in which case the REMEDY for RELATIONAL DISSONANCE is the re-cultivating of RELATIONAL RESONANCE which is where the indigenous aboriginal HEALING CIRCLE comes into play; i.e. to RESTORE RELATIONAL RESONANCE.
The JUSTICE SYSTEM given the relational dynamics of the STRAND IN THE WEB understanding is RESTORATIVE since while there may be VENTING of VIOLENT ENERGY through a particular STRAND in the WEB, as has been stated, the VENTING STRAND is NOT the AUTHOR of the VIOLENT RAPE OR MURDER, but the CONDUIT.
In WESTERN CULTURE, the one that VENTS VIOLENCE in RAPE or MURDER, whether a Jeffrey Epstein or a Ghislaine Maxwell, is in indigenous aboriginal culture, the IDENTIFIED PATIENT within a relational dissonance infused social collective that is NOT THE LOCAL AUTHOR OF VIOLENCE but the VENT FOR the BUILD-UP of DISSONANCE that belongs to the WEB (the relational matrix of the social collective), so that JUSTICE is RESTORATIVE. IN WESTERN CULTURE, BINARY LOGIC is used so that the VENTING STRAND IN THE WEB is reduced by BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC to the LOCAL AUTHOR. By CONTRAST, indigenous aboriginals do NOT use BINARY LOGIC but use, instead, the NONBINARY BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein the MATERIAL FORM aka CONDENSATION is BOTH itself AND at the same time, the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM it is included in. Or, in alternative language, BOTH THE STRAND itself and at the same time THE WEB (COMMUNITY) IT IS INCLUDED IN.
In BOTH CASES (STRANDS IN THE WEB, … and …. CONDENSTATIONS IN THE PLENUM) we see that a RESTORATIVE rather than PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE ‘makes sense’ since THERE IS NO LOCAL AUTHOR to VIOLENT or PRODUCTIVE events, since the flow-based phenomena are relational and without dependence of LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEINGS that purportedly AUTHOR ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS such as MURDER and RAPE. That is, ALL AUTHORING is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT in the STRANDS IN THE WEB social collectives while ONLY if we IGNORE the INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE of the STRAND in the WEB relations, so we reduce VIOLENCE, including RAPE and MURDER which has a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT STRANDS IN THE WEB ORIGIN, to LOCAL and EXPLICIT AUTHORING ORIGINS
The RESULT is a WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC that is FRAGMENTED and PURIFICATIONIST.
TRUST ME, this is worth CHECKING OUT for ONESELF.
* * * * * * OUTLOOK FOR ACCEPTANCE OF STRAND-IN-THE-WEB UNDERSTANDING IN WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES * * * * * *
The current INTENSIFYING of BINARY LOGIC POLARIZATION as in the REPUBLICAN – DEMOCRAT POLITICS, one would think, should be leading to some kind of WAKE-UP CALL to the fact that BINARY LOGIC is TOO SIMPLE and it draws the users into POLARIZING CONFLICTS wherein there is no EXIT, not so long as the combatants stick to BINARY LOGIC (RIGHT OR WRONG) based reasoning. BINARY LOGIC continues to PREVAIL because it supports EGO-INFLATING through the notion of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments and WESTERN CULTURE POLITICAL LEADERS are hired and fired on the basis of the CONVINCINGNESS of their LOCAL AUTHORING PROMISES. Meanwhile, when we back in the days where there was BELIEF in old-time ‘androgynous’ tenets such as “TO EVERYTHING THERE IS A SEASON AND A TIME TO EVERY PURPOSE” which implied that we were included in something GREATER THAN OURSELVES so that we ought not to be continuously using political rhetoric making claims which are FULLY AND SOLELY in terms of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING achievement (GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION) with NO MENTION of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate of SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, AGING and DECLINE of earlier developments, and CONSUMPTION (e.g. of non-renewal resources and rare-earth minerals), and hence NO MENTION OF OUR INCLUSION IN TRANSFORMATION BY WAY OF INTERCONNECTION and INTERDEPENDENCE.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.