INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL TRANSFORMATIONISM (NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) VS. WESTERN CULTURE CONSTRUCTIVISM (LOCAL and EXPLICIT)

 

Like Bohm, Nietzsche and Schroedinger, One can follow (and I have followed) the path of psycho-philosophical investigation that informs us that different varieties of language (linguistic conceptualization) are giving us different understandings of REALITY which in turn give rise to what we know and refer to as differing CULTURES.    ‘Language and Culture Are Frameworks Through Which Humans Experience, Communicate and Understand Reality’ (Vygotsky, 1968)

 

The following aphorisms point to TWO CHOICES of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which “PUT US INSIDE OF TWO DIFFERENT REALITIES”.

 

“To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose”….’There is a tide in the affairs of men”.   The former is from the Bible (Ecclesiastes 3:1-8) and the latter is from Shakepeare’s ‘Julius Caesar’.

 If we AGREE with this proposition, we thus agree that we can NEVER CLAIM PERSONAL AUTHORSHIP OF ANYTHING due the fact that, stated in WAVE-FIELD terms the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is ALWAYS, to SOME EXTENT ONE WAY OR THE OTHER, EXPANDED or DIMINISHED by the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONDITIONS it is SITUATIONALLY INCLUDED IN.  As FARMERS, FARMER ‘A’, may bring to harvest a BUMPER CROP and be celebrated for his skills and strong effort, and perhaps, his generosity and benevolent charity to ‘less productive’ members of the local community, while FARMER ‘B’ who skills and labors were equivalent to, or greater than FARMER ‘A’s, experienced crop failure due to hailstorms and flooding.

While our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME HAS US USING SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC TO STATE IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS, FARMER “A” PRODUCED A BUMPER CROP, while FARMER “B” FAILED TO PRODUCE ANYTHING OF SUBSTANCE, and to CLAIM THESE PROPOSITIONS TO BE THE HONEST TRUTH.  However, as Goedel’s Theorem affirms, ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS (though they may be provably TRUE) are INCOMPLETE.  In this example, what was NEVER MENTIONED was the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the ambient dynamics which are CONJUGATE to the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING actions of the FARMER, BOTH of which are CONTRIBUTORS to the UNFOLDING REALITY.

In other words, WESTERN CULTURE employs a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which is SOLELY MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING BASED, WHICH ‘DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE” which is INHERENT in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD in which WE and our PROJECTS are INCLUDED.  Farmer “A” found his crop-cultivating actions to be in harmonious relation with the ambient dynamics while Farmer “B” found his crop-cultivating actions to be in dissonant relation with the ambient dynamics, which is to remind ourselves of the Goedel’s Theorem INCOMPLETENESS of all FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS, and they are INCOMPLETE because “BINARY LOGIC” PROPOSITIONS consist ONLY of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING activity which comes by DROPPING OUT the natural WAVE-FIELD FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate.

Aphorisms such as ‘to everything there is a season’ EXPOSE AS “TOO SIMPLE” the common WESTERN CULTURE ONE SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY linguistic conceptualizing scheme based on the abstraction of MATERIAL BODIES moving about in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which portray human dynamics in BINARY LOGIC terms of EITHER ‘in motion’ OR ‘at rest’, FAILING TO ACKNOWLEDGE the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein MATTER is a CONDENSATION of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM such that MATERIAL FORMS are, as with WHORLINGS in FLOWING, “BOTH” themselves “AND” the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (WAVE-FIELD) they are CONDENSATIONS IN, WHERE “EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX” and where EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) by way of BEING CONDENSATIONS of the ONE, ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

As David Bohm points out;

 

“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm

(more…)