ted lumley

ted lumley

to come

Posts by ted lumley

PULLING THINGS TOGETHER

0

 

WHERE THIS NOTE IS GOING!   This NOTE is tying together and making new ‘sense’ out of several ESTABLISHED WESTERN CULTURE  ‘problem’ understandings related to CULTURE, THOUGHT and LANGUAGE.

 

THE PROPOSITION HERE IS that We live in a WAVE-FIELD WORLD and while INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL languages (and Modern physics) employ a WAVE-FIELD ARCHITECTURE, … our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES employ a “SIMPLIFIED” ARCHITECTURE which is just the REAL (“MALE ASSERTING”) COMPONENT of the WAVE-FIELD, which SIMPLY DROPS OUT THE IMAGINARY “FEMALE ACCOMMODATING” CONJUGATE.   I am using ‘REAL’ and ‘IMAGINARY’ from the mathematical vocabulary describing the TWO COMPLEMENTARY aspects of the WAVE-FIELD dynamic, sometimes referred to as PEAK and TROUGH, the MALE ASSERTING ‘PEAK’ being LOCAL and EXPLICIT while the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING ‘TROUGH’ is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

 

Please in mind that WE, OURSELVES ARE “INCLUDED” IN THE WAVE-FIELD WORLD AS IS THE FINDING OF MODERN PHYSICS AND AS HAS BEEN THE BELIEF OF INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURES, TAOISM/BUDDHISM AND ADVAITA VEDANTA, a BELIEF that has been incorporated in their respective LANGUAGES or USE OF LANGUAGE.

 

NOTA BENE:  WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES “DUMB DOWN”, in their mode of LANGUAGE-STIMULATED INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUALIZING, the WAVE-FIELD BY EXTRACTIONG ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE (LOCAL, EXPLICIT “PEAK”) AND DROPPING OUT THE CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING (NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT “TROUGH”.

 

What to look for in this write-up, which is bringing different ways of UNDERSTANDING the same thing (our “EXPERIENCING” of being included in the all-including WAVE-FIELD) which have been ‘sitting there’ waiting to be brought into CONNECTIVE CONFLUENCE so that the COHERENCIES that deepen our understanding may be ‘harvested’.

 

While there is a choice of different terminologies to use here BECAUSE DIFFERENT INTEREST GROUPS HAVE BEEN INVESTIGATING THE SAME (WAVE-FIELD REALITY PHENOMENON) USING THEIR PARTICULAR DISCIPLINARY APPROACHES AND VOCABULARIES, this gives rise our having access to basically THE SAME or very SIMILAR FINDINGS expressed using DIFFERENT VOCABULARIES or DISCIPLINARY JARGONS.  In my writing I have been using for Peak and Trough, ‘MALE ASSERTING’ and ‘FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING for terminology in WAVE-FIELD PHYSICS would the “REAL” and “IMAGINARY” COMPOENTS of the “COMPLEX SIGNAL”.   In UNDERSTANDING WAVE PHENOMENA, the important thing to keep in mind is that the ‘PEAK’ and ‘TROUGH’ are NOT TWO SPEARATE THINGS but are CONJUGATE ASPECTS of ONE THING; i.e. the WAVE-DYNAMIC.

 

Ok, now I am going to tie together the PSYCHOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS of LEV VYGOTSKY with MODERN PHYSICS because they point to the same WAVE-FIELD structure, and since the WAVE-FIELD is BASIC to REALITY (we share inclusion within the all-including WAVE-FIELD). ;

 

Lev Vygotsky was a Russian psychologist, pedagogue and playwright. He is often referred to as the “father of cultural-historical psychology” and his work had a profound impact on child development and education.

(more…)

The Importance of Understanding that GROWTH is a FICTION

0

 

Since the term “GROWTH” depends on the abstract concept of a THING-IN-ITSELF capable of enlarging in its own right, as if isolatable in an absolute empty space, there is NO SUCH THING AS “GROWTH” in the real world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.  There is ONLY “TRANSFORMATION”..

 

* * * 

I would encourage anyone NOT FAMILIAR with the MATHEMATICAL DESCRIPTION of WAVES to review the very basics, and would argue that THIS MAKES SENSE BECAUSE WE LIVE IN A WAVE-FIELD WORLD.  That is the finding of Modern physics and it agrees with the understanding of the structure of reality as understood by INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.

 

I tell you why I am saying this because, if you are like myself and have been ‘born and raised’ speaking one of the Common Average European Languages such as ENGLISH, then you, like myself, have bee CONDITIONED to think in terms of REALITY A SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO REALITY which is BINARY LOGIC BASED, and I can describe this fairly easily but that doesn’t stop us from continuing to have a knee-jerk reflex of THINKING in terms of a BINARY LOGIC BASED SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO-REALITY.

 

In order to AVOID the use of a SIMPLIFYING BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE based PSEUDO-REALITY CONCEPTUALIZTION, and be able to have LANGUAGE-based exchanges that are capable of QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, we have to change our language architecture and speak language that has the LESS SIMPLE capabilities of the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.

 

Our Common Average European LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS TOO SIMPLE to capture WAVE-FIELD CONCEPTUALIZATION because it “DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE”, reducing (simplifying) our WAVE-FIELD based SENSE-EXPERIENCE to one-sided MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT (e.g. ‘The TOWN IS GROWING’) whereas the LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE we need for CONCEPTUALIZING the WAVE-FIELD REALITY we are included in must employ the conjugate WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE which is the ANDROGYNOUS  FEMALE ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE RELATION; e.g. ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’

 

This is QUANTUM LOGIC structure, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.   QUANTUM LOGIC captures the relationship that associates with our understanding of SPACE as an ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka the WAVE-FIELD) within which ‘material forms’ are CONDENSATIONS.  That is QUANTUM LOGIC and in order to speak and write in a manner consistent with the actual physical structure of REALITY, we need to us QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE which I have highlighted with BOLD ITALIC AND YELLOW BACKGROUND like this; i.e. ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’

 

We can see that the relational structure here is one in which FIGURE and GROUND are ONE; i.e. the TOWNING is INCLUDED IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which is the QUANTUM LOGIC relation.

(more…)

A REVIEW of the ROLE of LANGUAGE in understanding “WHAT IS REALITY?”

0

 

We know that there is merit to Heraclitus’ aphorismOne can’t step into the same river twice because it is not the same river and not the same person stepping into it”

 

This is affirming, or at least suggesting, that we live in a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

 

We also know the Zen story of the farmer’s son who broke his leg (bad news) while training a wild horse and was, as a result, passed over by the Warlord conscripting all able-bodied young men to go to battle, wherein, as it turned out, they all got slaughtered. Thus, breaking his leg turned out to be ‘good’ and not ‘bad’.

 

This INTERPLAY between CONTENT and CONTEXT, where the meaning-giving of CONTENT can be OVER-RIDDEN by the meaning-giving of CONTEXT is fundamental to our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum.

 

Thus, it is evident the world we live in is ambiguous, … but what is the nature of this ambiguity?   How about the case of the THIN SKULL RULE in WESTERN JUSTICE where we evidently choose to SIMPLIFY THE REALITY and can’t be bothered to take into account the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING that gives over-riding meaning to the MALE ASSERTING ACTION    The EGG-SHELL SKULL “makes the AUTHOR OF THE BLOW TO THE HEAD look POWERFUL” and because of our simple WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, which is ONE-SIDEDLY MALE ASSERTING ONLY BASED, we capture such events with statements like “the BLOW TO THE HEAD SHATTERED THE RECIPIENT’S SKULL”.

 

This is like saying “the rainfall rivulets joined together forming streams which joined together forming a raging river that scoured out a canyon”,  which is all MALE ASSERTING and which OMITS MENTION of THE FEMALE VALLEY that organized the collection of the little male rivulets, pulling them all together to form the RAGING RIVER and without the organizing influence of the FEMALE VALLEY (which, by the way, is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) the RAGING RIVER IN ALL ITS LOCAL AND EXPLICIT MIGHT, WOULD NEVER HAVE COME INTO EXISTENCE.

 

There we (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS WITH OUR TOO SIMPLE LANGUAGE) GO AGAIN!  DROPPING OUT THE MOST ESSENTIAL PART OF THE REALITY which is the FEMALE CONTAINER.  REMEMBER what BOHM said; ‘SPACE IS NOT EMPTY, IT IS FULL’   ,

 

“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm

 

Evidently, our LANGUAGE is giving SHORT SHRIFT TO THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, the PLENUM in which the material forms are CONDENSATIONS akin to clouds in the atmosphere.  Simply because the CONDENSATIONS are visible and the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM is NOT visible, .. we have our language give a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE to the MATERIAL FORMS aka the CONDENSATIONS!  NO! NO! NO!, the primary reality is the energy-charged PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD and the visible CONDENSATIONS are SECONDARY.

In other words, in the INTERPLAY between CONTENT and CONTEXT, the meaning-giving of CONTENT can be OVER-RIDDEN by the meaning-giving of CONTEXT as is fundamental to our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum.

 

CONTENT is the LOCAL AND EXPLICIT while CONTEXT is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and the LATTER (CONTEXT) INCLUDES and prevails over the FORMER (CONTENT).

(more…)

Relational Coherency (integration) versus Binary Logic (differentiation)

0

Relational Coherency Avoids “the Incompleteness of Finite Binary Logic Systems” (Goedel’s Theorem)

 

Relational Coherency can inform us in a more comprehensive (integration) way than Binary Logic Either/Or progressions culminating in explicit closure (differentiation).

 

Relational coherency is the method of the indigenous aboriginal Learning Circle where the ‘talking stick is passed’ and all participants have the opportunity to share their experience-based knowledge by ‘speaking from the heart’.  Participants may thus benefit from the understandings that emerge from the relational confluence of the rich mixture of personal experiences.  The LOGIC implied in this relational coherency approach is QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING medium which DOES NOT APPLY BINARY LOGIC BASED DIFFERENTIATION TO REDUCE RELATIONAL FORMS IN THE FLOW to a notional INDEPENDENT ELEMENTS BASED DATA SET, setting the stage for discrimination between superior and inferior elements so as to isolate the SUPERIOR elements.  In QUANTUM LOGIC, the understanding of any included form is inextricably bound up in an understanding of the all-including PLENUM since the included forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

 

In the relational coherency approach to optimizing understanding (rather than the ‘refining’ or distilling out of that which is ‘most relevant’) offers us an INARTICULABLE UNDERSTANDING that is RELATIONAL COHERENCE based, which ‘takes form in the web-of-relations’ connecting the diversity of experiences being shared.

 

The relational coherency approach to understanding differs fundamentally from the BINARY LOGIC based ‘purification’ or ‘distillation’ approach where a multiplicity of (pre-processed) INTERPRETATIONS (thoughts from the interpreting intellect rather than raw feelings from the heart) are sifted through, two at a time, selecting in each binary comparison, the superior of the two, so that an overall ‘winning candidate for what is TRULY REALITY’ is ultimately selected.  This BINARY LOGIC based filtering of a multiplicity of intellectually pre-conditioned contenders for ‘REALITY’ is used to select the REALITY contender ‘that is MOST TRUE’.

 

But here we run into the limitation inherent in using BINARY LOGIC; a limitation that is given in Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite systems of Binary Logic.  For example, if we stablish as TRUE that ‘the TOWN is growing’, this says nothing about the REALITY that there is a CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS.  Thus, ESTABLISHING THE TRUTH, as in confirming the BINARY LOGIC proposition ‘the TOWN is growing’ is limited by the Goedel’s Theorem ‘Incompleteness of all finite systems of binary logic’.  THE MESSAGE IS THAT ‘ESTABLISHING LOGICAL TRUTH’ has no traction on “ESTABLISHING THAT WHICH IS REAL” due to the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite binary logic-based systems of propositions.

 

Here we spot an intrinsic difference between ‘the relational coherency approach to REALITY’ and ‘the binary logic approach to TRUTH’, since as Goedel’s Theorem warns, all finite systems of binary logic are innately INCOMPLETE, setting up conflict between TRUTH and REALITY since statements regarding the GROWTH of the TOWN may be TRUE, like all BINARY LOGIC TRUTHS, they are INCOMPLETE and REALITY may be far LESS SIMPLE than the SIMPLE LOGIC TRUTH such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’; i.e. as Sherlock Holmes might have said to WATSON, … WATSON, you idiot, can you not see that the REALITY is that the WILDERNESS IS SHRINKING and the LANDSCAPE IS TRANSFORMING and that LOGICAL TRUTH is always INCOMPLETE, but this WESTERN CULTURE habit where LOGICAL TRUTH is seized upon and used as the OPERATIVE REALITY, dysfunction arises that has become the downfall of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-GUIDED SOCIAL DYNAMICS.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC in an important way; i.e. QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the including medium, addresses the INTEGRAL NATURE of our sense-experience of inclusion in the all-including WAVE-FIELD aka the transforming relational continuum aka the Tao.

 

BINARY LOGIC is SIMPLER than QUANTUM LOGIC.  Whereas the material form is, in less simple QUANTUM LOGIC, an included feature in the all-including energy-charged PLENUM (e.g. We may think in terms of a WHORLING in the FLOWING where the WHORLING “IS” the “FLOWING”), BINARY LOGIC simplifies ‘this mental picture’ by capturing ‘the WHORL’ as a separate and independent ‘thing-in-itself’ notionally with ‘its own (grammar-given) POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.

  (more…)

IT IS HERE, The ‘EUREKA’ UNFOLDING!

0

 

IT IS HERE! The ‘EUREKA’ INSIGHT has ARRIVED!  The missing piece in a jigsaw puzzle has been located and fitted into place so that the GESTALT is taking over from the SUM OF THE PARTS.

I will share with you my path to this discovery and why we are more prone to missing it than finding it!  This insight is coming on the heels of the opening of my awareness to the ERROR of DIFFERENTIATION, which we introduce into LANGUAGE by assigning DIFFERENT NAMES to DIFFERENT RELATIONAL FORMS

As T.S. Eliot, an early student of the Vedic QUANTUM LOGIC MINDSET implies in his poetic writing, the richness of INTEGRATION is in no way limited to ‘the sum of the parts’ as DIFFERENTIATION would suggest.  T. S. Eliot writes in Little Gidding, for example; “Not known, because not looked for, But heard, half-heard , in the stillness Between two waves of the sea.”

The reality we live in is the WAVE-FIELD reality which is THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which can’t be captured in LANGAUGE.  As Lao Tzu observes; ‘the Tao that can be told is not the true Tao’.

Ok, here is the path of this discovery.  There is a CLUE in my critique of Bohm’s manner of explaining FRAGMENTATION, and I frequently quote him, most often without making any critique.  Bohm says the following, and please note the phrase underlined which is where THE PROBLEM can be detected as I will explain;;

(more…)

Why Modern Physics and Indigenous aboriginal “Quantum  Logic REALITY’ is not ACCEPTABLE to WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS

0

 

 

WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are a confident lot, pushing forward in the manner of their predecessors like an enthusiastic swarm of LEMMINGS even while experiencing the rising FRAGMENTATION and dysfunction (mass shootings etc.) that are characterizing the ‘playing out’ of WESTERN CULTURE’s continuing development.

 

Studies of ‘WHY this is’ point to LANGUAGE and our reliance on LANGUAGE based CONSTRUCTIONS OF ‘REALITY’ which, thanks to electronic networking now DOMINATE over sense-experience in WESTERN CULTURE intellectually-calculated design of social actions and developments.

 

At the bottom of this continuing dysfunction is BINARY LOGIC which is a very NEAT TRAP that DIVIDES people into two opposing groups and keeps them SQUABBLING IN ETERNAL DISAGREMENT and thus prevents THEM (which is of course the collective ‘US’) from moving beyond the MESMERIZING OPINION that there is a CORRECT LANGUAGE-BASED CAPTURE OF REALITY rather than just PERSECTIVES.

 

Schroedinger and others have pointed out that as individuals, we have OUR OWN PERSPECTIVES because we are INCLUDED, in a unique situational way, in REALITY.  Meanwhile, we attempt to use LANGUAGE to CAPTURE a GENERALIZATION of REALITY by way of OUR OWN PERSPECTVE and NAIL IT DOWN EXPLICITLY with LANGUAGE.   This is the WESTERN CULTURE CONDITIONED INDIVIDUAL MINDSET, although, contrastingly, the Indigenous aboriginal approach to understanding reality is to assemble a LEARNING CIRCLE and to bring MULTIPLE PERSPECTIVES INTO CONNECTIVE CONFLUENCE SO AS TO EXTRACT A “REALITY” BASED ON THE RELATIONAL COHERENCIES, which will in general be BEYOND CAPTURE IN LANGUAGE, but nevertheless cognitively capturable through LEARNING CIRCLES.

 

Nietzsche tried to promote this concept of harvesting the coherencies in the ‘connections’ of multiple perspectives within WESTERN CULTURE but we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are too heavily invested in a PURIFICATIONIST (filtering out only ‘the best’ content) APPROACH TO UNDERSTANDING REALITY, which is really just a joke since it degenerates into what has been captured in WESTERN CULTURE by LaFontaine’s tongue-in-cheek aphorism; ‘La raison du plus fort est toujours la meilleur’ (the reasoning of the strongest is always the best’.   And as Nietzsche pointes out;

 

There is only a perspectival seeing, only a perspectival ‘knowing’; the more affects we are able to put into words about a thing, the more eyes, various eyes we are able to use for the same thing, the more complete will be our ‘concept’ of the thing, our ‘objectivity’.– Nietzsche

 

Modern physics has affirmed what indigenous aboriginals have understood and tried to deal with by way of ‘Learning Circles’.  There is a major challenge in trying to architect LANGUAGE that can deal with OUR INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao.

(more…)

Reality as the Interplay Between the Sensual and the Symbolic

0

 

INTRODUCTION: Our AWARENESS of our ability, like the honey bee, to ‘unawarely pick things up’ in our traveling from place to place (or from our inclusion in a transforming relational continuum) and redistribute them, opens up our understanding of ‘self’ to understand the ‘self’ as something more than a local independent ‘being’.  Like a microbial assemblage within a cloud of microbial diversity wherein the clusterings defined as ‘humanings’ are just one of many such ‘resonance forms’, we are coming closer to an understanding of ourselves in the Modern physics sense of CONDENSATIONS in the all-including WAVE-FIELD.  This resonance-feature conceptualizing that is suggestive of ‘oneness with everything’ is coming from the WAVE-FIELD side of understanding things, which provides us with a LOCAL IDENTITY by way of the BOTH/AND relation of QUANTUM LOGIC.  Like the WHORLING in the all-including FLOWING, we are both INCLUDED in the FLOW while having an unique individuality by the manner of our WHORLING in the FLOWING.

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS did NOT architect our language to accommodate such a BEYOND BINARY LOGIC understanding as where we are HUMANINGS in the INCLUDING FLOWING of the WAVE-FIELD. This is the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC relation wherein we are ONE-WITH EVERYTHING, but like the whorling in the flowing, putting our own spin on things.  WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS INSTEAD, have ARCHITECTED OUR LANGUAGE to give ourselves an artificial INDEPENDENCE FROM THE WORLD WE LIVE IN, attributing to ourselves a kind of DIVINITY OF OUR OWN as LOCAL, EXPLICIT and INDEPENDENT CREATORS of actions and developments, … this coming from our language architecture as we designed it.  Instead of ONE-WITH-EVERYTHING, we have designed our language so as to portray ourselves as INDEPENDENT BEINGS, fully equipped by grammar with OUR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are embracing vision of reality based on DIFFERENTIATION rather than a vision of reality based on INTEGRATION and thus what we interpret is the INDEPENDENT MATERIAL FORM in the EMPTINESS rather than the CONDENSATION in the all-including PLENUM.  In other words, our visualizing seeks out the BINARY LOGIC DERIVATIVE rather than opening up to the QUANTUM LOGIC INTEGRAL, … “the TOWN GROWING” rather than “the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, the MALE ASSERTING without the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING. 

 * * * end of introduction * * * 

 

 

As we fly from country to country, we serve as a transport for a great variety of microbes, and so we similar to bees that perform as unwitting cross-pollinators that are contributors to the way the world works.  One must therefore ‘think again’ when it comes to models of life that feature ‘humans’ and ‘bees’ and other MACRO-FORMS that we, for our convenience of reference and speech, attach names to, to give them SYMBOLIC STATUS so that we can have a LANGUAGE that ‘works’ at the SYMBOL level.

Since We now have the understanding of the ‘human’ as a ‘microbial assemblage’;

“We humans are mostly microbes, over 100 trillion of them. Microbes outnumber our human cells ten to one. The majority live in our gut, particularly in the large intestine … The microbiome was not generally recognized to exist until the late 1990s.” — https://depts.washington.edu/ceeh/downloads/FF_Microbiome.pdf

Well, that pretty much exposes our long time SHORT CUTTING habit where we use LANGUAGE to general a collection of SYMBOLS that SIMPLIFY our REALITY REPRESENTATIONS.   Shhh!  Don’t mention how we humanings, that is, we microbiomes, leave a trail of microbes wherever we go, picking up an odd mix of new microbes as we visit new locales, so that when we use our high level symbol based language to say “Jack and Jill ran up the hill” we are constructing a symbolic meta-world that constitutes a HUGE DEPARTURE from our sense-experience as a microbial assemblage or some even finer understanding such as when we drop down to the WAVE-FIELD level where there are no longer any ‘material things’ only the WAVE-FIELD as the all-including plenum.

Of course, we know that fluids have whorlings and this whorlings can get viscous and turn to stone, so to-speak;

“Big whorls have little whorls,
Which feed on their velocity;
And little whorls have lesser whorls,
And so on to viscosity.”
—L. F. Richardson

So, our understanding goes deeper than the LANGUAGE based symbolic representations that we are using for everyday standard use SYMBOL BASED PSEUDO-REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS.

(more…)

REVIEW of MY LIFE… SOME REFLECTIONS…

0

 

There exists an INSIDER REVIEW OF OUR LIFE as well as a REVIEW of OUR ROLE-PLAY LIFE and these are very different in a manner that reminds me of what Argyris called DOUBLE LOOP LEARNING;

 

Double-loop learning is an educational concept and process that involves teaching people to think more deeply about their own assumptions and beliefs. It was created by Chris Argyris, a leading organizational trainer, in the mid-1980’s, and developed over the next decade into an effective tool. Double-loop learning is different than single-loop learning which involves changing methods and improving efficiency to obtain established objectives (i.e., “doing things right”). Double-loop learning concerns changing the objectives themselves (i.e., “doing the right things”).

 

In the REVIEW of MY LIFE, … what comes to my mind is how this splits into two different perspectives; i.e. for example, there is the perspective of Colonel Paul Tibbets Jr., the pilot of the Enola Gay that dropped the A-bomb on Hiroshima which associates with our situation with the intellectually shaped dynamics of the societal matrix that we uniquely work ourselves into, … and, …  there is the other situation as assessed by our sense-experience which simply assess our situation within the continually unfolding world dynamic based on emotions without the intellectual social structure framing.

 

I was never a draft-dodger because I was not a citizen of a country that employed the draft in my era, but like everyone, I was continually aware of the DIVERGENCE between (A) the envelope of outside societal behaviour shaping ‘pressures’ or ‘tendencies’ to ‘do the right things’ and my own internal desires or inspirations, which is not exactly the split that Argyris is talking about, the latter being further described with the following analogy;

 

Single-loop and double-loop learning are readily understood using the analogy of a household thermostat. Single-loop learning is about achieving a given temperature–like a thermostat set to 68 degrees that turns up the heat whenever the temperature drops below 68 (the objective). Double-loop learning involves changing the setting on the thermostat (i.e., changing the objective of the system). Double-loop learning calls for changing the objective itself. Indeed, double-loop learning is not only about changing the objective, but involves questioning the assumptions about that objective, the ways of discovering and inventing new alternatives, objectives, and perceptions, as well as ways of approaching problems.

 

Is this not simply the reversal of the ‘banishing of the Female WAVE-FIELD-conjugate, a banishing that left us with a one-sided MALE ASSERTING ACTION dynamic, unguided by the now missing (banished from WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE) female accommodating WAVE-FIELD conjugate?  The aggressive male-asserting conjugate is much admired within WESTERN CULTURE social collectives but as Lao Tzu advises, ‘Know the male but go with the accommodating female’.   We credit the punch with the shattering of the skull, even when it is the female accommodating of the eggshell skull that secures the collapse commonly credited to the male punch.  Perhaps this shift from ‘doing things right’ (the proud male way) to ‘doing the right things’ (the sensitive female accommodating) signals the homecoming of the DEA ABSCONDITA.

 

 

In seeing value in Argyris’ comments one does not have to be talking about ‘intellectually” changing the objective or “intellectually” questioning the assumptions about that objective, … what I am talking about is INTUITION of the type that has been transforming ‘who I am’, NOT by slowly morphing me from someone who has been ‘trying to do things right’ to someone who is trying to ‘do the right things’, but to someone who is coming to grips with the understanding that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING, so no need to fuss over whether I am ‘doing things right’ or ‘doing the right things’, both of which are male asserting pseudo-real abstractions, but to instead ‘let go of’ the local and explicit of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ and pick up on the ‘nonlocal and implicit’ of female accommodating that beckons conjugate male-asserting movements that transform the matrix of relations we are bound up in.  Male asserting movement induced to satisfy a nonlocal and implicit ‘growing female deficit’ appears to be making the latter the victim of linguistic obscurantism..

AFTER ALL, the concept of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ is a MYTH put together by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as Nietzsche pointed out. Life is relational and we are included in it.  As Schroedinger says, SUBJECT AND OBJECT ARE ONLY ONE, as was also pointed out by Ernst Mach.

 

The science of psychology is auxiliary to physics.  The two mutually support one another, and it is only when they are united that a complete science is formed.  From our standpoint, the antithesis of subject and object, in the ordinary sense, does not exist.” — Ernst Mach. ‘The Analysis of Sensations and the Relation of the Physical to the Psychical,

WHY IS THIS SO DIFFICULT for us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS TO PICK UP ON?

 

BECAUSE, as WITTGENSTEIN TELLS US, OUR LANGUAGE KEEPS REPEATING THE WRONG STUFF TO US, OVER and OVER AGAIN

 

A picture held us captive. And we could not get outside it, for it lay in our language and language seemed to repeat it to us inexorably. –-Wittgenstein

 

So, all of these quotes highlighted in bold italic are pointing to the reality that our sense-experience of being in the world has a ‘compound’ structure to it, consisting of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT of material world, and NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT of the …. what shall I call it, … ‘spiritual world’?  … or should I use the term ‘imaginary’ as in the complex mathematical structure where the ‘whole’ is composed of the ‘real’ and ‘imaginary’ components?.

 

Ernst Mach is calling it the ‘physical’ and ‘psychological’ and that makes sense to me, but there is more nuance to it than the simple labels suggest because, while the physical is LOCAL and EXPLICIT (concrete), the PSYCHOLOGICAL is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) and the questions arise as to which of these has precedence and how we are to combine them.

 

The ‘more nuance’ can be seen when we use language to capture just the MALE ASSERTING conjugate as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, … and we know from our sense-experience that this ALSO MEANS that the WILDERNESS is doing the FEMALE OPENING UP TO ACCOMMODATE THE MALE ASSERTING so why architect a LANGUAGE that DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE?

 

GUESS WHAT!   THIS DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE FROM OUR LANGUAGE ….. AT THE SAME TIME, ‘OPENS UP AN EMPTY SPACE’ AS THE NON-PARTICIPATING STAGE FOR PRESENTING MALE ASSERTING AS IF IN ITS OWN LOCAL AUTHORING RIGHT.

(more…)

TIME TO GET HONEST: It’s time to ACKNOWLEDGE that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’

0

 

We, ourselves, and all things are INCLUSIONS in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD which is a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM that is IMPOSSIBLE TO ‘REPRESENT’ with LANGUAGE.  Not only Lau Tzu is on record as reminding us that ‘the Tao that can be told is not the true Tao’, Modern physics has likewise pointed out that we live in an all-including WAVE-FIELD in which material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD.

As has been pointed out, the WESTERN CULTURE language architecture, because it is designed for DIFFERENTIATION, where we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to IMPUTE LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING to CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD, and pretend that the all-including WAVE-FIELD, because it is not accessible to our visual sensing, DOES NOT EXIST or in other words, that what exists is ONLY MATERIAL BEINGS that purportedly move about and interact within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.  This is an unreal, unsupported by sense-experience and unsupported by Modern physics ILLUSION that, as Benjamin Whorf shows, COMES FROM OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE wherein we DUMB DOWN the INTEGRAL, ALL-PERVADING WAVE-FIELD with its material CONDENSATIONS, a reality with a QUANTUM “BOTH/AND” LOGIC structure (the condensations are at the same time the containing wave-field there are included in, so that there is no such thing as MOTION (which implies things with persisting ‘being’), but instead only TRANSFORMATION which is purely relational.

A LANGUAGE based on DIFFERENTIATION is a MISTAKE since it FRAGMENTS not only ‘what we are seeing out there’, but ‘what we are thinking in here’.  WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE “IS SUCH A MISTAKE” as pointed out by Nietzsche in that our WESTERN CULTURE language habit is to give a foundational role to LOCAL AUTHORING in spite of the fact that there is no such thing as LOCAL AUTHORING within the real world of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  Thus THE WORLD OF WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE (not to be confused with the WORLD OF DIRECT SENSE-EXPERIENCE that does NOT have to depend on DUMBED DOWN reductions from sense-experience to intellectual linguistic construction. But we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have become habituated (mesmerized? addicted?) to employing the DUMBED DOWN “LOCAL AUTHORING’ based linguistic constructions of a simplified SUBSTITUTE REALITY as our OPERATIVE REALITY, making believe that LOCAL AUTHORING is legitimate … hence the writing of this note entitled   “TIME TO GET HONEST: It’s time to ACKNOWLEDGE that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ .

There’s no problem convincing indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING because that’s where they have been ‘coming from’, and who could have stopped the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL-ORGANIZATIONAL BEHEMOTH from IMPOSING and ENFORCING at least feigned public belief in such LOCAL AUTHORING abstractions as WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-ENDOWING POWER (of both INENTING INDEPENDENT BEING by way of DECLARATIONS of INDEPENDENCE and imputing LOCAL AUTHORIN POWERS to the INDEPENDENT BEINGS. Anyone who tries to state the obvious and expose the WESTERN CULTURE EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES, it likely to re-learn that same lesson that Giordano Bruno learned when he was burned at the stake back in 1600, for the HERESY of relativity and his comment that ‘The majority has no monopoly on determining TRUTH’.  Of course, a more experience based wisdom was that cited by Lafontaine; ‘La raison du plus fort est toujours la meilleure’ (‘the reasoning/truth of the most powerful is always the best’.)

The WESTERN CULTURE MAJORITY has decided that ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ is something ‘real’ and not simply a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR MALE ASSERTION as when we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ while DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE ‘the WILDERNESS is SHRINKING’.  So, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, in spite of protests and mocking even, of the indigenous aboriginals and Taoists etc. have in fact supported the language-based promoting of a ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” in which “LOCAL AUTHORING”  is a MAJOR PLAYER, leading to pervasive FRAGMENTATION, not only in terms of DECLARATIONS OF NATIONAL AND HUMAN-BEING INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE but in the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-CONDITIONED PSYCHES that play along with such unfounded abstraction.

“LOCAL AUTHORING” is a WESTERN CULTURE “MYTH” and “CRAZY-MAKER” but it has become the OPERATIVE TRUTH of the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT SOCIAL COLLECTIVE which is currently THE MOST POWERFUL and as the indigenous aboriginal cultures have seen, protest by way of laughing, mocking or resisting this WESTERN CULTURE “EMPEROR’S NEW CLOTHES” fiasco has not succeeded in ‘bringing it down’ because the abstraction of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ is, as systems science would described it, ‘LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS’.

Foremost among these HIGH SWITCHING COSTS is the cost of the loss of INFLATED EGO of those claiming to be the ‘LOCAL AUTHORS’ of amazing achievements, ignoring the SENSE-EXPERIENCE affirmed QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of our inclusion as CONDENSATIONS within the all-including NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ENERGY PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the GREAT HARMONY of the indigenous aboriginals aka the Tao of Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.  There is NO LOCAL AUTHORING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM. 

The WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR ABSTRACTION of the LOCAL AUTHOR (notionally) transfers the power that is innate in the transforming WAVE-FIELD that manifests THROUGH CONDENSATIONS (which are innately included and never ‘separate out’ as would reduce the QUANTUM LOGIC FIGURE-AND-GROUND-ARE-ONE RELATION to a BINARY LOGIC FIGURE-AND-GROUND-ARE-TWO relation).  LOCAL AUTHORING is an artifact of LINGUISTIC ARCHITECTURE REDUCTION from “BOTH/AND” QUANTUM LOGIC to “EITHER/OR” BINARY LOGIC; e.g. from the HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD to the ‘HUMAN’ in the ABSOLUTE INFINITE EMPTINESS of ABSTRACT EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY.

* * *

 

 

The choice of the ‘TIME TO GET HONEST’ title is to point out the need to OVERTLY DISTINGUISH between BINARY LOGIC which is ABSTRACTION that is responsible for the ABSTRACT notion of LOCAL AUTHORING, on the one hand, and QUANTUM LOGIC which is THE WAY OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION IN NATURE’S TRANSFORMATION based WORKINGS.  QUANTUM LOGIC captures the reality of our being CONDENSATIONS in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD aka TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

(more…)

The NITTY GRITTY of WESTERN CULTURE FRAGMENTATION

0

FORWARD:  Linguistic Obscurantism is the pathway wherein WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS use BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE to construct a SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein MECHANISTIC CREATION and DESTRUCTION is SUBSTITUTED for QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION.

We Western Culture Adherents, when we are in talking mode, are now PSYCHOLOGICALLY living in LANGUAGE-based SIMPLIFED SUBSTITUTE REALITY even as our sense-experience reality is based on awareness of inclusion in TRANSFORMATION, a physically affirmable reality acknowledged by the indigenous aboriginal, Taoists/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta LANGUAGE GROUPS as well as by Modern Physics.   Developing from this SPLIT between intellectual-linguistic and sensory experience realities is the MAJOR GAP between the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-SUPPORTED SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY and our INTUITIVE SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY wherein the SIMPLIFIED INTELLECTUAL-LINGUISTIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY is seen through the LINGUISTIC-LENSES of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based abstraction of “LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS” while the actual sense-experience affirmed REALITY comes in the form of ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION (the transforming relational continuum) which includes HUMANINGS-in-the-TRANSFORMING UNUUM.   We understand this in the sense of QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the including medium as in the all-including WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION.

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE uses a REDUCTION technique to SIMPLIFY/REDUCE the ANDROGYNOUS (QUANTUM LOGIC) dynamic of WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION to one-sided (BINARY LOGIC) MALE ASSERTING LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF based ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT (thanks to the ‘double error’ of naming and grammar), thus reducing WAVE-FIELD NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT QUANTUM LOGIC TRANSFORMATION wherein MATERIAL FORMS are BOTH distinguishable-forms-with-distinguishable behaviours while they are at the same time inclusions in the transforming relational continuum also known as the WAVE-FIELD. 

The sense-experience affirmed ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD REALITY which manifests as all-including TRANSFORMATION is thus REPLACED, by way of this REDUCTION, to a LANGUAGE based SUBSTITUTE REALITY using the WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European Language Architecture, that DROPS OUT the FEMALE CONJUGATE of the WAVE-FIELD dynamic, creating an abstract one-sided MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT ONLY ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ that serves as the WESTERN CULTURE “OPERATIVE REALITY”. 

This LANGUAGE based scheme develops a SUBSTITUTE for the ‘real’ world dynamic of the all-including WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION “BY DROPPING OUT” THE FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, creating a LANGUAGE-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY where action and development is attributed FULLY and SOLELY to MALE-ASSERTING AGENCY, as for example, in the ‘THIN SKULL RULE’.

It is this DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, which is the PRIMARY INFLUENCE in TRANSFORMATION that reduces language based constructions to, in mathematical terms, the REAL component of the COMPLEX SIGNAL which gives the APPEARANCE that the MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT is the FULL and SOLE REALITY AUTHORING SOURCE, hence the ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ and many more linguistic DROPOUTS of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

Since the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE is DROPPED OUT in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, the result is FRAGMENATATION since all actions are captured in language as MALE ASSERTING actions which is the ‘REAL’ component in the ‘REAL’ + ‘IMAGINARY’ WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE.  The WESTERN CULTURE  LANGUAGE-based DROP OUT turns the tables by erroneously PROMOTING the material condensations, which are secondary APPREARANCES, to PRIMARY REALITY STATUS within the SUBSTITUTE REALITY, while DROPPING OUT of the REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING ENTIRELY, the ‘IMAGINARY’ component which is the all-including WAVE-FIELD within which material forms are ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN” (APPEARANCE).

While the CONDENSATIONS give VISIBILITY to the dynamic of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD, the VISIBLE aspect is the secondary CONDENSATION, and since it is the REAL component of the COMPLEX REAL + IMAGINARY (MALE ASSERTING + FEMALE ACCOMMODATING) WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE, we have the situation within the language based construction where that which is REAL and VISIBLE CONDENSATIONS are, in sense-experience reality, secondary APPEARANCE while the IMAGINARY and NON-VISIBLE (FEMALE ACCOMMODATING) TRANSFORMING WAVEFIELD WHICH INCLUDES THE CONDENSATIONS is the PRIMARY sense-experience reality.  For example, when we are driving in the flow of freeway traffic, our movements are inductively shaped by the opening of relational channels.  RATHER THAN OPENINGS CREATED BY MATERIAL FORMS MOVING APART TO EXPOSE A SUBSTRATE OF ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE THAT ACCOMMODATES THE ACTION-AUTHORING DYNAMICS OF ‘MATERIAL FORMS’, THE RELATIONAL OPENINGS ARE A FEATURE OF THE OVERALL TRANSFORMING OF THE WAVE-FIELD WHEREIN MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD.

THERE IS A PSYCHOLOGICAL-VISUAL INVERSION HERE WHERE WE MISTAKENLY CREDIT THE MATERIAL FORMS AS THE ACTION AUTHORING SOURCE AND ASSUME AN EMPTY PASSIVE CONTAINING SPACE.  THIS BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION IS A SIMPLIFICATION OF REALITY THAT DROPS OUT THE FEMALE AUTHORING AGENCY BY SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE MEPTY SPACE FOR ENERGY-CHARGED FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ‘WAVE-FIELD’.  SO, IN REALITY WHAT LOOKS LIKE ‘EMPTINESS’ IS THE FULLNESS OF THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.   WHAT APPEARS TO BE MATERIAL BEINGS WITH THEIR OWN SOURCE OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT, ARE INSTEAD, CONDENSATION OF AND IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, WHICH REQUIRES THE LESS SIMPLE (THAN BINARY LOGIC) QUANTUM LOGIC TREATMENT IN LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION..

THUS, THE VISIBLE QUANTUM LOGIC MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS ARE ONLY SPOTS IN A NOT-DIRECTLY VISIBLE WAVE-FIELD PLENUM. THIS CONFLICTS WITH THE BINARY LOGIC UNDERSTANDING, BUILT INTO WESTERN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, WHERE THE MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS ARE JUDGED TO BE REAL, ABSOLUTE MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES SITUATIED WITHIN AN ABSOUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE THUS LEFT OURSELVES WITH A LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE THAT PROMOTES THE SECONDARY WAVE-FIELD CONDENSATIONS TO PRIMARY REALITY STATUS WHILE DISMISSING THE PRIMARY WAVE-FIELD REALITY AS AN ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS OF INFINITE EXTENT, PROMOTING THE CONDENSATIONS TO PRIMARY REALITY STATUS BY ANOINTING THEM WITH ABSOLUTE FIXED, INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEING STATUS AND GRAMMAR GIVEN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION of goods and services.

In this modeling of reality, the MALE-ASSERTING PUNCH “APPEARS” to prevail GENERALLY and have its way because of its visible material form, but as Lao Tzu points out, the greater reality with the clay vessel or the wheel is the HOLE in the middle.  The concave valley hole organizes the rainfall runoff and trickles by inductively pulling them together into streams and streams into the mighty RAGING RIVER which is then acclaimed for its MALE ASSERTING POWER of PLOUGHING THE CANYON FURROW, the natural primacy of the FEMALE INDUCTIVE INFLUENCE being lost in the LINGUISTIC WORD-SHUFFLE..

YES, it is possible to architect LANGUAGE that will support the construction of a MATERIAL BEING (MALE ASSERTING) SUBSTITUTE REALITY as has been done in WESTERN CULTURE as constituted by one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS (dropping out the FEMALE CONJUGATE) and to use this LANGUAGE BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY as the OPERATIVE REALITY for organizing what we linguistically connote to be male asserting actions and developments; i.e. the MALE without the FEMALE, the REAL without the IMAGINARY, CONSTRUCTION and DESTRUCTION without TRANSFORMATION. 

This DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (the substituting of empty space) is the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE DESIGN.  While this LANGUAGE supports the construction of SIMPLIFIED SUBTITUTE REALITY, its constructions are seriously ‘at odds’ with SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY due to the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

IT IS ALSO POSSIBLE to architect LANGUAGE that will support our sense-experience of inclusion in ANDROGYNOUS TRANSFORMATION which has a QUANTUM LOGIC structure wherein female-accommodating and male asserting are in conjugate union, an understanding that is in contradiction to the OBSCURANTISM built into the ‘Thin Skull Rule’ which instead DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD and gives a foundational role to the MALE ASSERTING conjugate on its own.  The Modern physics, Indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta ANDROGYNOUS, QUANTUM LOGIC language architecture, with its exemplars such as Rheomode and Algonquin,  is manifest in constructions such as ‘there is HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, capturing the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation.  This is a LANGUAGE BASED ‘REALITY’ that involves the sending of COMPLEX (real + imaginary conjugate or MALE-ASSERTING + FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate SIGNALS that conform with SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD.

The WESTERN CULTURE orientation to one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS (dropping out the FEMALE CONJUGATE) and to use this LANGUAGE BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY as the OPERATIVE REALITY is the continuing source of FRAGMENTATION in both a PSYCHOLOGICAL and SOCIAL-RELATIONAL context.

 

* * *

 

 

 

 

 

We Live in a WAVE-FIELD and this works fine but if we want to TALK ABOUT IT, this requires a COMPLEX LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE in the sense that it has both a REAL and IMAGINARY component.

 

Indigenous aboriginals HAVE such a LANGUAGE while WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have a SIMPLIFIED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE where the simplification is the REDUCTION of the needed COMPLEX LANGUAGE to just the REAL component, which we get by DROPPING OFF the IMAGINARY component.  Here’s an example;

 

The indigenous aboriginal language is COMPLEX; e.g. the COMPLEX language construction is; “There is HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM” which means that there is HUMANING in the WAVE-FIELD in the sense that the material forms we call HUMANS are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.   This relationship where the HUMANING is BOTH ITSELF AND at the same time a CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD is the QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION.  It is like the WHORLING in the FLOWING of a whirlpool in a stream where what we are actually seeing is the TRANSFORMING FLOW of the stream since the WHORLING is INCLUDED in the FLOWING.  This QUANTUM LOGIC relation is general in nature and is supported by Modern physics which is where the term QUANTUM LOGIC comes from which is referring to this BOTH/AND relation where the WHORLING is “BOTH” its WHORLING SELF “AND” its FLOWING self.   This is to say that THERE ARE NOT “TWO THINGS HERE”.  THE WHORLING is NOT INDEPENDENT OF THE FLOWING, the WHORLING IS A FEATURE OF THE FLOWING.  THIS IS WHAT QUANTUM LOGIC MEANS and it is the PHYSICAL REALITY.  WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IMPOSES BINARY LOGIC BASED SIMPLIFICATION that ABSTRACTLY SPLITS APART “WHORLING'” and “FLOWING”.

 

Thus, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS use a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that SIMPLIFIES and describes this QUANTUM LOGIC reality with BINARY LOGIC whereby we change our articulation of the WHORLING IN THE FLOWING wherein we re-capture WHORLING-as-an-action, as a THING, by substituting the noun ‘WHORL’ and then we use (as Nietzsche has pointed out) the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING (WHORL) and GRAMMAR (the WHORL is growing, developing and producing a disturbance), so that as far as our LANGUAGE usage goes, instead of there only being ONE DYNAMIC (WHORLING IN THE FLOWING) we put together the DOUBLE ERROR construct so that we are speaking as if there are TWO SEPARATE THINGS; i.e. the WHORL and the FLOW and we are saying that THE WHORL IS “A DISTURBANCE” THAT IS MOVING “THROUGH THE FLOW” which is SEPARATE from the FLOW.

 

OK, I switched from HUMANING to WHORLING because I thought it might be easier to get the point across (without getting ‘personal’) but the procedure whereby we use language to reduce FLOW-based QUANTUM LOGIC to THING-based BINARY LOGIC applies generally and ONLY THE FORMER (QUANTUM LOGIC STRUCTURE) IS SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE and that is ‘THERE IS WHORLING IN THE FLOWING’ which is the QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization since that is the ACTUAL PHYSICAL RELATIONSHIP where there is WHORLING IN THE FLOWING or HUMANING IN THE FLOWING.  The FLOWING is the WAVE-FIELD so MODERN PHYSICS is telling us that we live in an all-including WAVE-FIELD or in other words, an ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which there are CONDENSATION based features (that WE RE-CAST with LANGUAGE and GRAMMAR as INDEPENDENT MATERIAL FORMS) that are so common and familiar to all of us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, BUT ONLY BY WAY OF LANGUAGE BASED CONSTRUCTIONS because there are no such things as ‘INDEPENDENT MATERIAL FORMS’ in the real world of sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum, there are only CONDENSATIONS that are intrinsically INTEGRAL to the all-including WAVE-FIELD and only APPEAR ‘to have a ‘life of their own’ (as WHORLS and HUMANS ‘on their own’ in ’empty space’ instead of WHORLINGS and HUMANINGS in the TRANSFORMING PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

 

But when it comes to USING LANGUAGE to TALK ABOUT THESE MATERIAL FORMS, the indigenous aboriginal language and Modern physics languages, like Bohm’s ‘Rheomode’ flow-based language, make use of the QUANTUM LOGIC based language which is COMPLEX (has real and imaginary components) which captures the BOTH/AND relationship where the WHORLING is, at the same time, the FLOWING which is the QUANTUM LOGIC relation.   This relation requires the COMPLEX language of WAVE-FIELD dynamics which means LANGUAGE that is implying BOTH a REAL and an IMAGINARY COMPONENT.

 

OK, ‘IMAGINARY’ is an unfortunate choice of labels for what might instead be called “the-FEMALE (accommodating trough) conjugate-that-goes-together-with-the-MALE (pushing out peak).   So, I will use the terms MALE-ASSERTING conjugate for the ‘REAL’ wave component and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate for the ‘IMAGINARY’ wave component.

 

I am using this alternative vocabulary just to SIMPLIFY the language-based presentation.  I am NOT changing the Physics.

(more…)

ted lumley's RSS Feed
Go to Top