OVERVIEW:

The world we live in; i.e. the world of our sense-experience of inclusion in a transforming relational continuum, is knowable only by inference since we cannot ‘get outside of it’ to capture an understanding of it as an independently existing world.  This means that what we SEE OUT THERE as LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES as we speak of in such terms at THE TOWN that is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products is only a SUBSTITUTE REALITY or SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE for the INEFFABLE WAVE-FIELD REALITY WE AND EVERYTHING IS INCLUDED IN.  Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE FRAGMENTS the transforming relational continuum of our sense-experience of inclusion therein, reducing and simplifying the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE to LOCAL, EXPLICIT FRAGMENTS such as ‘the TOWN’ which we give a life of its own to with GRAMMAR as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products, as if we are an external observer enjoying a voyeur view on which we can overlay a MEASURING GRID of the WORLD we are observing AS IF FROM THE OUTSIDE.  If we can see it from the outside, it is not the reality we are included in, but is instead a SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which WE ARE MISSING.  We must there be careful with our use of language based representations because if they are voyeur views, they are not view of REALITY since REALITY is something we are included in.

In this context, we may remind ourselves of Nietzsche’s point about the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR whereby we establish a language based description of a NAMING-instantiated notional LOCAL THING IN ITSELF (a BEING) such as ‘the TOWN’ and we conflate this with the second error of GRAMMAR to impute LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT to the FIRST ERROR of the NAMING-INSTANTIATING of a notional THING-IN-ITSELF.

This language-based REPESENTATION is NOT of REALITY but of a LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY where the THING in our FOCAL POINT, we are using GRAMMAR to equip with POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.

NOTA BENE:  THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” (i.e. as in ‘the TOWN that does its own GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING) in our real-life sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao.  The LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta DOES NOT EMPLOY THE ABSTRACT NOTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING IN THEIR LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS.  E.g. their languages fashion representations in terms of “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX as in TRANSFORMATION as Heraclitus maintained was the actual sense-experience affirmed REALITY and in a reality wherein everything is in flux, there are no LOCAL AUTHORS of ANYTHING.

While it is CORRECT to say, in keeping with the all-including transforming WAVE-FIELD, that ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, it is INCORRECT to say ‘the TOWN is GROWING, or DEVELOPING or PRODUCING something’… which imputes the POWER OF LOCAL AUTHORING to the TOWN as within the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR language structure.  This is INCORRECT and it brings forth REPRESENTATIONS that purport to be REPRESENTATONS OF REALITY when they are actually REPRESENTATIONS of an ABSTRACT SUBSTITUTE REALITY, the SUBSTITUTE REALITY OF A BINARY LOGIC based LOCAL TOWN THAT IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING THINGS, as if it were INDEPENDENT of the SPACE it is included in.  And by our language based construction of such SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE, we SHUT OUT FROM  OUR MENTAL ACCESS, the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY of TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT REMAIN UNDER THE PSYCHOLOGICAL INFLUENCE OF OUR BINARY LOGIC based SUBTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS that, as Bohm is saying, is the source of SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA as in the COVID 19 PATHOGEN ATTACK (there are no PATHOGENS in QUANTUM REALITY, only IMBALANCES).  PATHOGENS are BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION that DO NOT EXIST in our relational world where there is relational BALANCE and IMBALANCE but NO LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORING AGENTS and thus no LOCAL, EXPLICIT GOOD and EVIL AUTHORING AGENTS.  We can be CHANNELS or LIGHTNING RODS through which RELATIONAL DISSONANCE can ‘surface’ but THERE ARE NO LOCAL AUTHORS of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, GOOD, BAD or INDIFFERENT.  WE ALL SHARE INCLUSION IN A WAVE-FIELD world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …”  The FRAGMENTED SUBSTITUTE REALITY COMMISSIONED BY LINGUISTIC DOUBLE ERRORS OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR IS, as SCHROEDINGER OFFERS, ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ (APPEARANCES).

* * * 

 

 

We might ask ourselves, Why do we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS choose to THINK and SPEAK in terms of CONTINENTAL DRIFT (where the continents are understood as LOCAL and EXPLICIT MALE ASSERTING objects) .. rather than SEAFLOOR SPREADING (where the ocean basins are understood as NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ACCOMMODATING holes).

 

We find, if we reflect on this, that SEAFLOOR SPREADING implies CIRCULATION since if we focus on the SPREADING, there must be new material being extruded from the interior of the Earth sphere to fill in behind the spreading which involves older material subducting.  Because the surface area of the sphere of the Earth remains the same size, there must be a SUBDUCTION ZONE here older material on the surface SINKS INTO THE BODY of the Earth to ‘make way’ for the OUTWELLING extrusion of material that adds material on top of the pre-existing surface.   What we are comparing here in CONTINENTAL DRIFT (which concerns “LOCAL, EXPLICIT” CONTINENTS) vis a vis SEAFLOOR SPREADING which is comprised of EXTRUSION and SUBDUCTION are understandings with DIFFERING DIMENSIONALITY since the CONTINENTAL DRIFT is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and SUPERFICIAL while SEAFLOOR SPREADING IS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and TRANSFORMATIVE (everything is in flux, as was the observation of Heraclitus and as is supported by Modern physics with its WAVE-FIELD understanding of reality wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD).

 

HOW DOES LANGUAGE DEAL WITH THESE DIFFERENT UNDERSTANDINGS?

 

ANSWER:  “DIFFERENTLY” (i.e. different language architectures have been developed which different groups of people have embraced which deliver differing views of ‘reality’.  The power of different languages to put us (psychologically) into different “realities” is the finding of Benjamin Whorf, and it has been controversial because many of us prefer to understand that there is only ONE reality and it is the reality that our social group ‘lives in’.  Thus for the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT the very different reality understood by indigenous aboriginals can be ignored because, “as everyone knows” (so say the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS), we are all INDEPENDENT HUMAN BEINGS who live on a spherical planet which moves about within a collection of planets, stars and material bodies within a vast and ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.

(more…)