Archive for October, 2022
GUIDE TO A COMPOSITE OF RECENT SUMMARY POSTS0
A COMPOSITE of RECENT SUMMARY POSTS can be found here
The PRIMARY FINDING of my philosophical researching is that while we are inclusions within a WAVE-FIELD CONTINUUM, our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is REDUCTIONIST and we set about to TRYING to explain ourselves by breaking things down into the LCOAL AND EXPLICIT even though the UNDERSTANDING that we seek to share is WAVE-FIELD based which means it is RELATIONAL, NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT. This problem is like trying to share an awareness of the LANDSCAPE by way of describing the TOWNS and other LOCAL FEATURES. This is the REDUCTIONIST approach which starts by DIFFERENTIATING THINGS and FOLLOWING UP with INTEGRATION.
IT DOESN’T WORK, NOT EVEN IN MATHEMATICS where we end up having to refer to a CONSTANT OF INTEGRATION in which we package all the bits that FELL OUT in the process of DIFFERENTIATION in one AMORPHOUS CONSTANT.
In a LANDSCAPE ‘pock-marked’ with TOWNS, if one describes the TOWNS, their GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of products as in the REDUCTIONIST approach, we find ourselves UNABLE TO PUT HUMPTY DUMPTY back together again and we are left with a multiplicity of MAPS of the TOWNS and these MAPS are FLATSPACE things based on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT which is what our common MAPPING approach delivers, a FLAT-SPACE REDUCTION of a spherical space reality. In the SPHERICAL SPACE of our sense-experience of inclusion therein, EVERYTHING IS RELATED and while RELATIONS can communicate the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as is the make-up of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM of our sense experience of inclusion therein, … we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have adopted as our standard, a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that REDUCES the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD REALITY to a MULTIPLICITY OF FRAGMENTS which are LOCAL and EXPLICIT.
COMPOSITE OF RECENT ‘SUMMARY’ POSTS0
From: firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com>
Sent: October 29, 2022 1:32 PM
Subject: SIMPLE SUMMARY of The COMMON THREAD IN THIS LONG CHAIN OF MESSAGES: OUR WESTERN CULTURE SCREW-UP IN A NUTSHELL
MAKE NO MISTAKE: OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE IS OUR MAJOR SCREW-UP BECAUSE IT REDUCES THE REPRESENTATOIN OF THE WAVE-FIELD NATURE OF REALITY BY SPLITTING APART THE FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING AND MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJGUATES AND DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE CONJUGATE SO THAT OUR LANGUAGE DOES NOT ‘CAPTURE’ REPRESENTATIONS OF SENSE-EXPERIENCE RELIATY, BUT INSTEAD FABRICATES A SUBSTITUTE REALITY BASED ON THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE ONLY. THIS PUTS OUR LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS “AT ODDS WITH” OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE. AS BOHM OBSERVES, THIS IS THE SOURCE OF SCHIZOPHRENIA AND PARANOIA IN WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS.
The world of WESTERN CULTURE language representations is CONSISTENT for all the users of our REALITY-DISTORTING LANGUAGE REPRESENTATIONS which means this language WORKS as a SUBSTITUTE-REALITY BASED COORDINATING TOOL for its users. Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED CONSTRUCTIONS OF A SIMPLIFIED (MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE ONLY) SUBSTITUTE REALITY, while a GROSS DISTORTION of sense-experience reality, are THE SAME FOR ALL LANGUAGE USERS thus the SIMPLIFIED (DISTORTED) SUBSTITUTE REALITY implied by the language, EVEN THOUGH IT IS “AT ODDS WITH” our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, PROVIDES A “CONSISTENT” REFERENCE FOR THE USER BASE OF WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS.
How Whorf’s Hypothesis Uncloaks Quantum Logic Reality0
We live in an ANDROGYNOUS QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD reality that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based representations reduce to a one-sided BINARY LOGIC, MALE-ASSERTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY, as described herein;
The hypothesis of linguistic relativity, also known as the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis is a principle suggesting that the structure of a language affects its speakers’ worldview or cognition, and thus people’s perceptions are relative to their spoken language. – https://www.britannica.com/science/Whorfian-hypothesis
LINGUISTIC RELATIVITY is behind the fact that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are stuck in a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY due to our language having ‘dumbed down’ our representation of QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD REALITY by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and constructing MALE ASSERTING ONLY representations of a BINARY LOGIC, MECHANISTIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY. For example, instead of the fluid-dynamical, quantum logical ‘TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, we use language to reduce this reality to the mechanistic, binary logical ‘the TOWN (as if in its own ‘independent’ right) that is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’. This simplified, fragmented, one-sided, MALE-ASSERTING ONLY LINGUISTIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY has become our WESTERN-CULTURE “OPERATIVE REALITY”. As systems scientists have noted; this is “inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence.
* * *
Of the logos [aka the Tao, the Wave-field], which is as I describe it, people always prove to be uncomprehending both before they have heard it and once they have heard it. For, although all things happen according to the logos, people are like those of no experience, even when they do experience such words and deeds as I explain when I distinguish each thing according to its phusis (nature / constitution) and declare how it is; but others are as ignorant of what they do when awake as they are forgetful of what they do when asleep.
Those who hear and do not understand are like the deaf. Of them the proverb says: “Present, they are absent.”
The reason why we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ‘do not get it’ even ‘after hearing it and seemingly understanding it’ can draw on the experience of Heraclitus and his 500 B.C. era contemporaries in this same respect;
How WAVE-FIELD goes MISSING in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE0
FORWARD: WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European LANGUAGE has become a powerful force in the world because of its SIMPLICITY. It is SIMPLE because of its DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, leaving only imagery that associates with MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.
“Upon this gifted age, in its dark hour,
Rains from the sky a meteoric shower
Of facts…they lie unquestioned, uncombined.
Wisdom enough to leech us of our ill
Is daily spun; but there exists no loom
To weave it into fabric…”
Edna St Vincent Millay, From Huntsman, What Quarry? (1939)
SIMPLICITY is achieved by the SUBSTITUTING of the SIMPLER MALE-ASSERTING “EITHER IS OR IS NOT” DIFFERENTIATING/EXCLUDING ‘BINARY LOGIC’ in place of the LESS SIMPLE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING “BOTH MAYBE WILL AND MAYBE WILL NOT ” INTEGRATING/BALANCING ‘QUANTUM LOGIC’. QUANTUM LOGIC RESONANCE is a form of BALANCE that does not involve a BINARY DEADBOLT OPEN AND CLOSED DETERMINATION. CHOOSING BETWEEN THESE FORMS OF BALANCE IS CHOOSING BETWEEN THE WAYS OF EAST AND WEST and the full force of the difference may easily be missed.
“Plato clearly distinguished between Heraclitus’ SIMULTANEOUS unity and plurality of the cosmos and Empedocles’ SEPARATE PERIODS of Love and Strife. At the same time, they are mentioned together as both alike in believing in the unity and plurality of the cosmos; and Aristotle’s coupling of the two might conceivably have been motivated by the Platonic comparison, the important distinction between them being overlooked.” – Kirk, Raven et al, The Presocratic Philosophers
WHY NOT HOLD ON TO THE QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND TENSIONS OF THE OPPOSITES AND RIDE THE RESONANCE THROUGH THE TUNNEL OF TRANSFORMATION RATHER THAN FOMENTING A HARD-ASSED BINARY DEADBOLT SPLIT?
Instead of designing our language architecture to capture the QUANTUM LOGIC of the non-visible WAVE-FIELD (electromagnetic field) in a meaningful conjugate relation with the visible CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD, we have designed a language that conveys a simplified SUBSTITUTE REALITY consisting of a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE populated locally by ABSOLUTE INDEPENDENT BEING BASED MATERIAL FORMS. This BINARY LOGIC based linguistic representation scheme, while it does simplify our language-based representation of reality, does so by constructing language-based representations of a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which ‘throws out’ the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE. The popularity of this WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED SIMPLIFICATION has led to a “LOCK-IN-BY-HIGH-SWITCHING-COSTS’, so that in spite of its continuing infusing of dysfunction into our social-relational dynamic, our path to extricating ourselves from this predicament remains unclear and continues to be a work in progress.
* * *
Linguistic determinism (popularly known as the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis), argues that INDIVIDUALS EXPERIENCE THE WORLD BASED ON THE STRUCTURE OF THE LANGUAGE THEY HABITUALLY USE.
If we say ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ can we still ‘see’ the same thing as indigenous aboriginals ‘see’ when they say ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’?
My philosophical investigations say NO! Once we narrow our focus to ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’, our thinking is in BINARY LOGIC based mode where ‘the TOWN’ is seen and understood as a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF that is INDEPENDENT of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM IT IS INCLUDED IN.
If, on the other hand, we are users of an indigenous aboriginal language where we are saying ‘There is TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, this language construction is conveying QUANTUM LOGIC rather than BINARY LOGIC.
CONVERSELY, the BINARY LOGIC formulation of ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, and PRODUCING goods’ infers the LOCAL BEING of ‘the TOWN’ and conflates this with the inference that this LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING called ‘the TOWN’ has ‘its own’ GRAMMAR-given POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments. Nietzsche refers to this construction as the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, pointing out that what it does is suggest that the NAMING instantiated THING-IN-ITSELF possesses ITS OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT. Once we COMMIT to saying THE TOWN IS GROWING, we enter into a BINARY LOGIC “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” where all of our language-based FOREGROUND FIGURES such as the TOWN or the PERSON or the TREE are NOTIONALLY (by way of language and grammar stimulated intellectual abstraction) STRIPPED OUT OF THEIR INNATE INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and RESITUATED WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.
The RELATIVITY of BEING0
My philosophical/sensual investigative experience informs me that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are NOT SENSITIVE to the extent to which LANGUAGE can DISTORT and over-ride our sense-experience informed conceptualizing of reality, and in particular induce us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS to translate our sense-experience into LANGUAGE that SIMPLIFIES representation of our sense-experience by the injection of BEING. The abstraction of BEING allows us to FRAGMENT our language-based representations of reality by INJECTING a notional LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING base as in the construction of MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, implicitly SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT from the actual, sense-experiencing of our inclusion in the all-including WAVE-FIELD, which is captured within indigenous aboriginal LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES as also in Modern physics, with FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING—MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE REPRESENTATION such as ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which is entirely fluid and has no dependency on BEING based abstraction.
WESTERN CULTURE EXPRESSION IN ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING TERMS: “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING’” (LOCAL AUTHORING OF EXPLICIT ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT).
INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL AND MODERN PHYSICS (androgynous) WAVE-FIELD REPRESENTATION: “There is TOWNING in the transforming LANDSCAPE” (NONLOCAL AUTHORING of IMPLICIT RELATIONAL DYNAMICS).
Note that the TOWN in the FOREST cannot GROW without DEFORESTATION, or in other words, in reality, the MALE-ASSERTING ACTION is only realized in conjugate relation with FEMALE ACCOMMODATING. This is the message of Modern physics and it is an understanding that is incorporated in indigenous aboriginal language architecture, but NOT in WESTERN CULTURE language architecture, which employs one-sided male asserting only abstractions such as GROWTH, hence this ‘reminder’ that the TOWN in the FOREST cannot GROW without some DEFORESTATION
NOTA BENE: Within a EUCLIDEAN SPACE assumption (i.e. a FLAT SPACE assumption), our language talk of the GROWTH of the TOWN in the FOREST employs “GROWTH” in the sense of one-sided MALE ASSERTING and does not SPEAK OF the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the FOREST, but in the REALITY of our inclusion in SPHERICAL SPACE, the GROWTH of the TOWN is inextricably tied to a CONJUGATE DEFORESTATION and DEFORESTATION IS AN IMPORTANT PHYSICAL REALITY. In fact it is the OPENING in the FOREST that is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE that, TOGETHER WITH THE MALE ASSERTING “GROWTH” CONJUGATE, constitutes that actual sense-experience affirmable dynamic of T R A N S F O R M A T I O N.
WESTERN Language-Brewed INSANITY0
Understanding reality in terms of WAVE-FIELD reminds us that (a) Our real life sense-experience is of inclusion in the all-including WAVE-FIELD which has an ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING—MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE STRUCTURE; and (b) Our WESTERN CULTURE has developed a language that not only SCREWS UP this understanding by SPLITTING the FEMALE-accommodating and MALE asserting conjugates INTO SEPARATE PIECES, but by retaining and making PRIMARY the MALE asserting conjugate while TOSSING OUT the truly primary FEMALE accommodating conjugate. This is a DOUBLE WHAMMY of misunderstanding since the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE is UNREAL SCHAUMKOMMEN (appearance).
* * *
This essay, WESTERN Language-Brewed INSANITY reviews how WESTERN LANGUAGE has been based on BINARY LOGIC, a TOO SIMPLE LOGIC in that it SIMPLIFIES language-based REPRESENTATIONS of REALITY, and in a particularly devious way; i.e. by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE CONJUGATE in the representation of our FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE WAVE-FIELD REALITY. This has been identified by Nietzsche in his pointing out of the commonly used DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which captures representations of reality in the SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC TERMS of MATERIAL FORMS that ACT and INTERACT within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.
Not only Modern physics but also indigenous aboriginal languages, along with Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita ‘adaptions to language’ comprehend the ANDROGYNOUS, FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE nature of our WAVE-FIELD reality, as we understand from our sense experience of inclusion within it; i.e. we understand that mountains erode, shrinking and filling in valleys and the ancients like Lao Tzu have reminded us that the FEMALE influence, e.g. the accommodating influence of the VALLEY plays the lead in this ‘conjugal dance’ with MALE ASSERTING providing the supporting complement. This relational is LESS SIMPLE than the BINARY LOGIC relationship that has been given a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE. This reduction of the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD REALITY, in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, to a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING SIMPLIFICATION as given by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR is a CRAZY-MAKER and the reason for the title of this essay, WESTERN Language-Brewed INSANITY.
Because we have architected language to simplify it by dropping out the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJGUATE and thus REMOVE the WAVE-FIELD NATURE from our Common Average European language based representations, we are in effect constructing a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which as now become our standard WESTERN CULTURE “OPERATIVE REALITY” based on the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR whereby reality is reduced to MALE ASSERTING actions and developments; e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ instead of the full ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE, as used in indigenous aboriginal languages and as required for consistency with Modern physic, “there is TOWNING in the transforming landscape”.
The CRAZY-MAKER is that we have SIMPLIFIED our language architecture by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE CONJUGATE which the BODY of the WAVE-FIELD, and what we have ‘left in’ is the SECONDARY, DEPENDENT MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE, along with the FEMALE CONJUGATE SUBSTITUTION which is ABSOLUTE, INFINITE ‘EMPTY SPACE’. This PROMOTES the MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE to THE LEAD ROLE ON ITS OWN. But in the real sense-experience affirmed WAVE-FIELD reality, what we have DROPPED OUT is the PRIMARY REALITY and what KEPT IN AND PROMOTED TO PRIMARY was the SECONDARY and INCOMPLETE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE so that instead of saying ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which is the ANDROGYNOUS package, we construct representations of a SUBSTITUTE REALITY featuring the MALE ASSERTING CONJGUATE WITHOUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE; i.e. ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING goods and services.’
This brand of language which employs a BINARY LOGIC based DIMINISHMENT to a MALE ASSERTING ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY, DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, and is thus at odds with the physical reality wherein there is TOWNING (male-asserting) in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (female accommodating), the DROP OUT giving the MISTAKEN IMPRESSION that “WHAT WE ARE CONSTRUCTING” with our MALE ASSERTING ACTION, is “REAL”. But WHAT IS REAL is the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM WHICH IS ALL-INCLUDING AND IN WHICH WE ARE INCLUDED and this is what we are experiencing but which we cannot see through VOYEUR VISION as we monitor ‘our own constructions’.
Indigenous aboriginal languages support the Modern physics and sense-experience affirmed understanding that we are included in the all-including, transforming relational continuum also known as the WAVE-FIELD which includes NOT ONLY THE TOWN THAT IS GROWING, DEVELOPING AND PRODUCING goods, but includes it NOT AS A MALE ASSERTING WITHIN AN EMPTY SPACE but in the ANDROGYNOUS context of TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.
The MALE ASSERTING REPRESENTATION ON ITS OWN is NOT SIMPLY INCOMPLETE. THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD INCLUDES WITHIN IT THE MALE ASSERTING MATERIAL CONDENSATION as a DERIVATIVE FORM or APPARITION which Schroedinger calls Schaumkommen. WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, KEEPS THE SCHAUMKOMMEN AND PROMOTES IT AS A SUBSTITUTE PRIMARY REALITY while DROPPING OUT the INVISIBLE BODY OF THE WAVE-FIELD which is the SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED FULL-BLOWN REALITY from whence the lesser MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS FORM.
Our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD informs us well beyond our visual-intellectual reductions to language wherein we capture one-sided MALE ASSERTING substitute reality dynamics such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, an INCOMPLETE logical proposition based simplification that says NOT A WORD about the conjugate SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS and by such radical DROP-OUT, BLINDS US to the reality of the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION that we are included in.
WE ARE NOT LOST (we do not NEED to be lost). We have our sense-experience which it is essential for us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS to restore to its natural PRIMACY over our language based intellectual reductions which in the case of our Common Average European languages, are giving us a FRAGMENTED SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on the BINARY LOGIC DROP-OUT of the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and the SUBSTITUTING of ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT..
* * * * * *
WESTERN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE INVERTS THE NATURAL ORDER OF THINGS by putting the LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL DYNAMICS of NAMING-INSTANTIATED FORMS into an unnatural primacy over NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FLUID DYNAMICS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.
The ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD of our sense-experience is a QUANTUM LOGIC mélange of TRANSPARENT ELECTRO-MAGNETIC FIELD and VISIBLE and TANGIBLE CONDENSATIONS.
WESTERN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE delivers REPRESENTATIONS in words and grammar that form the basis for building REPRESENTATIONS, … NOT OF REALITY (‘the word is not the thing as Korzybski observes) but of an INTELELCTUALLY MANIPULABLE SUBSTITUTE REALITY.
DOES CLUSTERING PRODUCE CLUSTERS?0
FORWARD: We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have engineered a trickiness within our language which REDUCES RESONANCE FEATURES to BEING based OBJECTS, as with CLUSTERING which we reduce to ‘the CLUSTER’ and then we follow up with GRAMMAR to impute to the CLUSTER “ITS OWN AUTHORING POWERS” which ‘WALLPAPERS OVER” its real identity as a RESONANCE FEATURE that is NOT AN “IT” but is a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT relational feature and therefore DOES NOT HAVE “ITS OWN POWER” OF LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT. The CLUSTER is nevertheless, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION, endowed by NAMING with BEING and EQUIPPED by GRAMMAR with its OWN notional POWERS OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.
This LANGUAGE-SUPPORTED BEING based FRAGMENTION OF REALITY used in the construction of a BEING-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY lets us enjoy the FALSE GLORY AND/OR SHAME of LOCAL AUTHORING, and removes us from our INNOCENCE of being included in the transforming relational continuum, without an encounter with snakes and partaking of forbidden fruit.
“They were upright and correct without knowing that to be so was righteous. They loved one another without knowing that to do so was benevolence. They were sincere without knowing that to do so was loyalty. They kept their promises without knowing that to do so was to be in good faith. They helped one another without thought of giving or receiving gifts. Thus their actions left no trace and we have no records of their affairs” – Chuang Tzu
Can we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS break the habit of giving our one-sided MALE ASSERTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY UNNATURAL PRECEDENCE over our ANDROGYNOUS sense-experience of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD? Can we find the words to flip from ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ to ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’?
* * *
MODERN PHYSICS IS IN AGREEMENT WITH INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY BUT NOT IN AGREEMENT WITH WESTERN CULTURE… HERE’S WHY
PROFOUND DIFFERENCES IN UNDERSTANDING can come from basic assumptions, and that is the case in the EAST-WEST SPLIT in LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATION of “REALITY”
The word is not the thing and language based representation of reality are NOT REALITY but our language based conceptualizations of reality shape our individual and collective behaviours.
The difference between EAST and WEST can be illustrated by the difference between the VERB ‘CLUSTERING’ and the NOUN ‘CLUSTER’ (e.g. as in the case of ‘ants’ or in general).
WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have embraced a language architecture that SIMPLIFIES capture of CLUSTERING (a verb), … which is a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT dynamic, to ‘the CLUSTER’ which is a LOCAL and EXPLICIT THING-BASED dynamic.
CLUSTERING is NOT simply the work of the participants in “A CLUSTER”, CLUSTERING occurs within a relational complex as when a drop of honey from a bee-hive INDUCES the CLUSTERING of ants. In this case, an understanding of CLUSTERING involves developments in the HABITAT involve the relations between the INHABITANTS and the HABITAT and one way of understanding this is in terms of TRANSFORMATION in which case we consider the INHABITANT-HABITAT system be ONE SYSTEM.
LANGUAGE makes an important difference to our thinking and understanding here because in those languages which give a foundational role to NAMES (NOUNS), one the NAME ‘CLUSTER’ in injected into the REPRESENTATION, we shift away from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT structure of CLUSTERING within the transforming landscape to LOCAL and EXPLICIT “CLUSTER” as if it exists IN ITS OWN BEING-BASED RIGHT, in which case we are forced to invent a GRAMMAR to describe WHAT WE SEE or rather to CONSTRUCT A SUBSTITUTE REALITY BASED ON LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEINGS aka ‘ANTS’ and in our mind’s eye as we pronounce such words as ‘THE CLUSTER IS GROWING LARGER AND IS SHIFTING TOWARDS THE WATER”S EDGE’.
Most Recent Comments