FORWARD: The impact of using language based on QUANTUM LOGIC versus BINARY LOGIC 

‘QUANTUM LOGIC’ is the logic associated with our understanding that we and all things are ‘condensations’ within an all-pervading electromagnetic WAVE-FIELD.  Quantum logic is thus BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein MATERIAL FORMS as CONTENT and the CONTAINER (the containing) WAVE-FIELD are ONE. ‘BINARY LOGIC’ is the EITHER/OR logic of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM associated with the understanding that all material objects are INDEPENDENT THINGS that move about and interact within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.

From this description we can see that QUANTUM LOGIC gives us an IMPRESSION of reality in the GESTALT terms of an all-including transforming relational continuum aka ‘the WAVE-FIELD’ while BINARY LOGIC gives a REPRESENTATION of reality in the FRAGMENTED terms of INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BODIES which move about and interact within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT. While QUANTUM LOGIC is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, BINARY LOGIC is LOCAL and EXPLICIT.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC has a FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING—MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE STRUCTURE since the WAVE-FIELD has the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CAPACITY of INCLUDING the MALE ASSERTING CONDENSATIONS in a FIGURE and GROUND as ONE manner (e.g. similar to a local, explicit WHORLING within the nonlocal, implicit FLOWING, where FIGURE and GROUND are CONJUGATE ASPECTS of ONE FLUID DYNAMIC aka the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD.

(An example of QUANTUM LOGIC is ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, where FIGURE (TOWNING) and GROUND (TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) are “ONE” as in the BOTH/AND logic of the including medium)

 

BINARY LOGIC is MISSING the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE RELATION leaving only the ASSERTING MALE to do its work of representation ALONE in EMPTY SPACE, in a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING fashion where the ‘GROUND’  aka the ‘CONTAINING MEDIUM’ is ‘EXCLUDED’ (hence ‘the BINARY EITHER/OR Logic of the EXCLUDED medium) leaving only the MALE ASSERTING FIGURE to be perceived as the local, explicit ACTION and DEVELOPMENT AUTHORING AGENT.  This DROPOUT of the nonlocal, implicit female-accommodating energy-charged PLENUM aka ‘WAVE-FIELD’ is the source of fragmentation.

 

(An example of BINARY LOGIC is ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’ ,where FIGURE (the TOWN) and GROUND (EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT) are TWO as in the EITHER/OR logic of the excluded medium.)

QUANTUM LOGIC IS THE STANDARD LOGIC OF INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURE ADHERENTS WHILE BINARY LOGIC IS THE STANDARD LOGIC OF WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS and is embodied in a foundational manner in the Common Average European language architectures.  Thus, while the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS speak in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms that “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS speak in the BINARY LOGIC terms that ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products”.  While QUANTUM LOGIC evokes CONJUGATE FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING TRANSFORMATION as in the WAVE-FIELD dynamic, BINARY LOGIC evokes one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT and the EGO-based pride of the (mistaken) notion of LOCAL AUTHORING.

The expression ‘INSPIRATION fills the heart’ while EGO swells the head’,… describes the respective geometries of ‘the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT’ FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and the LOCAL and EXPLICIT MALE ASSERTING.   INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE has an ARCHITECTURE that incorporates both FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and MALE ASSERTING while WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE has an ARCHITECTURE that goes with ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING and substitutes ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE for FEMALE ACCOMMODATING, the latter playing the primary animating role in the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC.

* * * END OF FORWARD * * * 

 

Thought and Language are closely tied together, but HOW?  This is the subject explored by Lev Vygotsky (“father of Russian Psychology”) in ‘Thought and Language’

Our understanding  of the relationship is important to our understanding of our own sense-experience and why there is a major difference in how Indigenous aboriginal cultures understand “what they think of as ‘reality’” and how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS understand “what we think of as ‘reality’”.

NOTA BENE: what the indigenous aboriginal cultures “think of as ‘reality’” corresponds to the WAVE-FIELD structure of Modern physics while what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “think of as ‘reality’” corresponds to the REAL COMPONENT of the WAVE-FIELD (complex ‘real’ + imaginary) structure.

EXAMPLE:  the phrase “there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” exemplifies the WAVE-FIELD dynamic with its REAL plus IMAGINARY components; i.e. the TOWNING is the “real” component which is given foundational support by the “imaginary” component; i.e. ‘the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

(Language can express the ‘local and explicit’ in a relationship with the ‘nonlocal and ‘implicit’ as also with ‘realism’ and ‘impressionism’ which corresponds with WAVE-FIELD math with its ‘real’ and ‘imaginary’ components’.  Indigenous aboriginal language and Modern physics ‘Rheomode’ language use ‘local and explicit realism’ and ‘nonlocal and implicit impressionism’ in conjugate relation while WESTERN CULTURE language architecture SPLITS OUT AND USES ONLY ‘local and explicit realism’ ON ITS OWN, substituting ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE while DROPPING OUT the ‘nonlocal and implicit impressionism’. That is, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE SPLITS OUT AND USES ONLY ‘the TOWN is GROWING, …  substituting ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE as a ‘fill-in’ for DROPPING OUT ‘THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.)

In general discourse, we speak of these different forms of relation, also, in terms of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT and the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  By way of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT we get to REPRESENTATIONS of sense-experience reality and by way of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT we get to IMPRESSIONS of sense-experience reality.

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, Taoists/Buddhists and Modern physics combine these as in the mathematical description of the WAVE-FIELD with its ‘REAL’ and ‘IMAGINARY’ components which correspond to our different modes of thought and language which we refer to as REALISM and IMPRESSIONISM; i.e. the REALISM corresponds to what is REPRESENTABLE (the ‘real component in wave-field maths) while the IMPRESSIONISM (imaginary component in wave-field maths)

(more…)