Archive for December, 2022
The BIG LIE built into WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE0
DIFFERENTIATION is one of TWO COMMON “PROCESSING TECHNIQUES” (the other is INTEGRATION) that we CAN USE in reducing our sense-experiencing to LANGUAGE based representation.
DIFFERENTIATION is the WESTERN CULTURE “PREFERRED” reduction method for linguistic capture of our sense-experience.
INTEGRATION is the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL and Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta reduction method for linguistic capture of our sense-experience.
DIFFERENTIATION EXAMPLE: The Human is growing.
INTEGRATION EXAMPLE: There is humaning in the TRANSFORMING landscape.
THE BIG LIE in the TITLE of this essay refers to our use of the SIMPLE (either/or) concept of DIFFERENTIATION instead of the LESS SIMPLE (both/and) concept of INTEGRATION as the FOUNDATION of our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE and THOUGHT.
THE SIMPLIFICATION that lies in the concept of DIFFERENTIATION comes from the DUMBING DOWN of the concept of INTEGRATION to the SIMPLER concept of DIFFERENTIATION by way of the REMOVAL of the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE so that we use our THUS-SIMPLIFIED LANGUAGE to conjure up a one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY; e.g. The TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is an ANDROGYNOUS CONCEPTUALIZATION that, by REMOVING the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE of the ‘TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ sets up ‘the TOWN’ as a notionally INDEPENDENT THING-IN-ITSELF to which we equip (notionally, with language) the GRAMMAR-given POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods and services.
What was initially INTEGRATION by way of the ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE-ACCOMODATING — MALE ASSERTING ‘coniunctio-oppositorum’ within the transforming relational continuum becomes, by the BIG LIE , the LOCAL MALE -ASSERTING AUTHOR OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT that stands on its own in an intellectually contrived ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which language has substituted for the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE. Note the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as Nietzsche calls it that makes possible the SIMPLIFYING REDUCTION of the FEMALE -ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC to the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING-ONLY LOCAL AUTHOR based ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT.
What we do with language when we DIFFERENTIATE is that we use NAMING as the first part of an intellectual scheme to FRAGMENT the reality continuum of our sense experience so that we can extract a LOCAL, EXPLICIT picture of what is in reality an unfragmented, transforming continuum.
In our sense-experience reality, everything is in flux within the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD. While this is our sense-experience ‘reality’, it is NOT capturable in language. As Lao Tzu observes; ‘the Tao that can be told is not the true Tao’.
‘The Tao’ is a name for the ‘transforming relational continuum’ which is the unbounded, all-including space-time, which is impossible to capture in a finite language stream.
A CHOICE OF TWO POSSIBLE ‘WORK-AROUNDS for the INEFFABLE nature of sense-experience have presented themselves; i.e.
“DIFFERENTIATION” and “INTEGRATION”
Our sense-experience is of our inclusion in ‘the “PLENUM”, an all-including energy-charged CONTAINING MEDIUM, otherwise known as the WAVE-FIELD wherein there is a continuing emerging and subducting of relational forms as in a boiling liquid.
As ‘language architects’ whose goal is to design a system of word-based representations of this world of our sense-experience which is in continuing flux (i.e. it is a transforming relational continuum), we have DESCRIPTIVE TRACTION of TWO TYPES; i.e. there is the CONTAINING FLUID from which the FLOW-FORMS are continually emerging which is NONLOGAL and IMPLICIT because it is a flowing continuum wherein relational descriptions are all that is possible. In this case, our language design would be constrained to language terms referring to relational movement, so that we would be limited to capturing in language continually changing relational patterns in the flux such as “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” where we preserve the reality wherein everything is in flux in which case FIGURE and GROUND are ONLY ONE which is consistent with the understanding that reality is the transforming relational continuum wherein there are RELATIONAL FORMINGS (condensations of the plenum) THAT ARE CONTINUALLY ‘GATHERING AND SCATTERING’, AS IN HERACLITUS.
There is the LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE option of INTEGRATION wherein we speak in such terms as “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, which gives the impression of an ANDROGYNOUS CONTAINER-CONTENT DYNAMIC wherein “EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX” but which succeeds in conveying BOTH the asserting developing of an item of CONTENT in conjugate relation with the accommodating opening of the CONTAINER.
This INTEGRATION BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE OPTION has been the choice of INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENS.
THERE IS ALSO THE DIFFERENTIATION BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE OPTION which entails the REDUCTION OF THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT ontology of flowing forms, to the LOCAL AND EXPLICIT “BEING-BASED-EXISTENCE” OF MATERIAL OBJECTS WITH GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.
IT IS THIS DIFFERENTIATION BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE WITH ITS GRAMMAR-ANIMATED-BEING-BASED ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS THAT HAS BEEN ADOPTED AS OUR WESTERN CULTURE PREFERRED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE. INSTEAD OF THE FLUID (NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT) ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, WE NOW HAVE THE RIGID (LOCAL AND EXPLICIT) ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING AND PRODUCING products).
“EAST IS EAST AND WEST IS WEST AND NEVER THE TWAIN SHALL MEET” —Kipling
It’s Christmas Eve in the year 2022 (on some calendars). It’s a time to hearken back to another era wherein the spiritual and the physical were ‘more in balance’, when the see-sawing of ‘Inspiration that fills the heart’ played the lead and the ‘Ego that swells the head’ remained in a supporting role.
We know that ‘something happened’ and the Balance flipped which makes things difficult because Inspiration is the Female opening that can inspire Male asserting, and without which, the Male asserting becomes ‘Mechanical’ and Uninspiring ‘work’.
Some say that the Western Culture shift in emphasis from Female inductive Inspiration that fills the heart to Male asserting Ego-that-swells-the-head is coming from the influence of Language Architecture so that we are ‘talking ourselves into’ understanding the world we live in as if it were a big machine, based solely on Male-asserting actions and developments, as if the spiritual pull of the Female ‘Inspiration that fills the heart’ did NOT even exist, just because we Western Culture Adherents have dropped it out of our language architecture.
Could language really be the Grinch that is stealing the soul of Western culture social collectives?
I have over time (and through philosophical investigations) become more conscious of the differences in languages and how languages such as English do Drop Out the Female Wave-Field conjugate which is that aspect of language that associates with ‘Inspiration that fills the heart’. So that in re-printing the indigenous aboriginal story of ‘My Father and the Lima Beans’ (see below), there is a revival of awareness of how language does indeed have the power to DROP OUT the inspirational element and deliver purely mechanistic impressions of ‘reality’ (i.e. not ‘really reality’ but a dumbed down Substitute Reality).
There is also a reminder here of how indigenous aboriginal languages RETAIN the spiritual, or Female accommodating impression by capturing impressions in the integrative form ‘there is Towning in the transforming landscape’ rather than fragmenting things down to ‘the Town that is Growing, Developing and Producing things’
Is SPIRITUALITY being lost here? In the story ‘My Father and the Lima Beans’, we are informed of the realness and importance of Inspiration that fills the heart’ as may come from music, even though our usual assessment of individuals is in terms of material actions and development that we see them as being the authors of and which our Western culture encourages us to constrain our value assessments to (and thus to stay out of the fuzzy-wuzzy realm of spiritual nurturance.
My philosophical researches inform me that this spiritual channel for energizing positive actions is a real physical influence even though it is nonlocal and implicit as is the nature of the Wave-Field. This is a point in favour of theories such as those of Modern physics where it is understood that material forms such as ourselves are Condensations of the all-including Wave-Field.
The ancient ‘vibes’ or ‘resonances’ we seem to feel at Christmas and New Years, that fall into the category of ‘Inspiration that fills the heart’ may be a physical reality as would ‘make sense’ if the world is an all-including Wave-Field and we ‘humanings in the transforming continuum’ are Condensations of the Wave-field as Modern physics would have it.
For a long while, we Western Culture Adherents have supported our scientific leadership that told us that the world was made up of a vast or infinite vacuum that was locally populated by tangible material objects or ‘things-in-themselves’, often with their own powers of authoring growth, development and the production of more things, and we have built this into our language architecture, the language we are continuing to use in the present for constructing our representations of reality. So we are continuing to use the BINARY LOGIC geometry of mutually exclusive Matter and Empty space as a way to craft representations of reality a simplified Substitute (linguistic representation-based) Reality that we are employing as a tool for sharing impressions of our sense-experience.
Christmas and the Solstice is that special time where we give ourselves the ‘space’ to let go of our Binary Logic constructions of reality wherein we think of ourselves in the Binary Logic terms of material beings with powers of authoring actions and developments within an absolute empty and infinite spatial vacuum, … and instead, imagine that we could be Condensations of an all-including energy-charged Plenum, an all-including Wave-Field where all of the Condensations are related, so that we are connected with the stars above since everything belongs to the one, all-including Wave-field.
Christmas and the Solstice seems to be a time for opening ourselves up to such understanding of our inclusion, an overall inclusion, in a Wave-Field Unum or in other words a Spiritual Unum that is both the source and container of the myriad material Condensations such as ourselves, who never break totally free of one another because we are all Condensations in the one all-including Wave-Field.
The old cold and fragmenting intellectual abstraction of ‘independent being’ floating about like material fragments in a vacuum, while it has been fully and thoroughly discredited, remains embedded in our language because it is not just an idea that we articulate using language, we have infused our Binary Logic assumptions of the matter and empty space constitution of reality into the foundational architecture of language, for example with the Double Error of NAMING and GRAMMAR that we use to imply LOCAL AUTHORING which we have given a FOUNDATIONAL role to in our Western Culture Language Architecture. But the abstract notion of a ‘local author’ is a linguistic BINARY LOGIC based abstraction that can make NO CLAIM of being of use as a representation in any way, shape or form, of a transforming relational continuum aka WAVE-FIELD.
So, the Christmas and Solstice celebrations are the occasion that we as a social collective have set aside to let go of our pretending that our ‘independent being status’ is the full and straight story, even though we keep repeating it over and over again, having built this ‘independent being’ status into our Western Culture language architecture.
Deck the halls with boughs of holly
‘Tis the season to be jolly
Don we now our gay apparel
Fa-la-la, la-la-la, la-la-la
Troll the ancient Yule-tide carol
‘Yule’ from the Old Norse jōl, the name of the Pagan winter feast lasting 12 days, a name later applied to Christmas.
The recurrence of ‘seasons’ marked by days of festive celebration are a ritual that acknowledges not only that we are included in something greater than ourselves but that ‘that something greater’ has an all-including Wave-Field (seasonal) nature to it.
Wave-fields are of an Androgynous nature which gives rise to both Female Accommodating Inspiration that fills the heart’ and Male Asserting ‘Ego that swells the head’ and there is one thing we may have noticed about our Western Culture language architecture which is that it is SUBSTITUTING empty space for the Female Accommodating Wave-field conjugate which leads to language constructions featuring one-sided Male-Asserting actions as the FULL (SUBSTITUTE) REALITY.
So, what happens within a Culture that DUMBS DOWN the language-based representation of reality to a one-sided Male-Asserting only abstraction? What ‘Happens’ has been labelled ‘Suboptimization’ where we attempt to optimize the Male-Asserting conjugate without attending to the Female-Accommodating conjugate, thus for example, the GROWTH of TOWNS in size and number may be approached in a one-sided Male-Asserting manner ignoring the reality that, sense-experience-wise, we really do live in a Wave-Field which is of an Androgynous Female-Accommodating —Male-Asserting nature/
And, … just because our Western Culture LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE allows us to FRAGMENT our Language-based REPRESENTATION of REALITY by DROPPING OUT the Female Accommodating Conjugate … THIS DOES NOT MEAN THAT SUCH DROP OUT IS REALLY POSSIBLE. In fact, the SIMPLIFYING DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE is only possible within the SUBSTITUTE REALITY of intellectually-stimulated imagination-contrived language-based REPRESENTATION. As a result, we put our simplified intellectual understanding into direct conflict with our far less-simple sense-experience. Just because we can make language based representations of sense-experience reality that are SIMPLER than sense-experience reality does not mean we have to use them as our ‘operative reality’ and thus act in error by directing our actions according to our simplified language, rather than by our less simple sense-experiencing.
“As regards the academies, they are established in order to regulate the studies of the pupils and are concerned not to have the program of teaching change very often: in such places, because it is a question of the progress of the students, it frequently happens that the things which have to be chosen are not those which are most true but those which are most easy. And by that division in things which makes different people form different judgements, it so happens that certain people are in error contrary to their own opinion.” – Johannes Kepler, ‘Harmonies of the World’
Sometimes, we need a break from the intellectual confusion, … then it’s time to, …
Deck the halls with boughs of holly
‘Tis the season to be jolly
It’s Christmas Eve in the year 2022 (on some calendars) and it’s a time to hearken back to another era wherein the spiritual and the physical were ‘more in balance’, before the ‘Inspiration that fills the heart’ was hijacked and held hostage by the ‘Ego that swells the head’ … which happens when simple Binary logic substitutes for less simple Quantum logic.
* * *
From BALANCE (Quantum Logic) to DIFFERENTIATION (Binary Logic) AND BACK.0
The DUMBING DOWN from linguistic understanding based on BALANCE to linguistic understanding based on DIFFERENTATION is what occurs in the passage from INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL and MODERN PHYSICS linguistic understanding to to WESTERN CULTURE COMMON AVERATE EUROPEAN linguistic understanding.
The inserting of the adjective ‘linguistic’ is to distinguish the very different (reduced) type of understanding that comes from intellectual contemplation of ‘words and grammar’ in a language stream, from our sense-experience grounded way of knowing and understanding from physical involvement. That we all understand this difference manifests in the fact that we distinguish between giving our female children ‘sex education’ rather than ‘sex experience’.
While THOUGHT and LANGUAGE are understood in our WESTERN CULTURE educated social collective (as comes from the influence of Piaget) is that they are two separate schemes, however, consistent with QUANTUM LOGIC, the relationship between Thought and Language deriving from the psychological investigations of Lev Vygotsky as captured in ‘Thought and Language’ is as follows;
In ‘Thought and Language’, Lev Vygotsky points out that ‘spontaneous concept formation’ induced by the situation we find ourselves in, and ‘scientific concept formation’ which we can think of as our corresponding intention driven response that is inductively actualized by the unfolding situation, are a single system; i.e. a situational-intentional nonduality.
This is, in fact, an expression of QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM which manifests in our WAVE-FIELD world wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD.
SUMMARY of my PHILOSOPHICAL INVESTIGATION FINDINGS from 1996 to 20220
I could NOW SUM UP my philosophical investigations from 1996 to 2022; i.e. the last 26 years in the following 8 propositions.
-1- LANGUAGE IS THE PROBLEM, and in particular it is a WESTERN CULTURE PROBLEM IN THAT, FOR STARTERS, WESTERN CULTURE LANUAGES ‘DUMB DOWN’ ‘BALANCE’ TO ‘DIFFERENCE’ For example, to speak of the GROWTH of CULTIVATED LAND is to change the BALANCE of WILDERNESS DIVERSITY LANDS and CULTIVATED LANDS which is TRANSFORMATIVE. DIFFERENCE and DIFFERENTIATION which SIMPLIFY language based representations are the ROOT SOURCE of how WESTERN CULTURE (oversimplified) LANGUAGE is SCREWING UP the PSYCHE OF THE WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE (Hey, Bohm has already made this clear)
-2- LANGUAGE is something we use to CONSTRUCT an INTELLECTUAL REPRESENTATION of REALITY (and our WESTERN CULTURE REALITY is SCREWED UP)
-3- WE all have our SENSE-EXPERIENCE which ‘speaks the truth’ prior to our putting words to it and things may work better when we DON’T.
-4- LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES can be either DIFFERENTIATION based (our screw-up) or INTEGRATION based (the indigenous aboriginal’s wise choice). INTEGRATION is LESS SIMPLE than DIFFERENTIATION because WHEN WE CONNECT THINGS TOGETHER LIKE the GROWTH of CROPLANDS and the SHRINKAGE OF WILDERNESS the spherical space influence of BALANCE manifests.
-5- DIFFERENTIATION based language REDUCES the WAVE-FIELD to the MALE-ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, TOSSES OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and SUBSTITUTES AN EMPTY SPACE
-6- Modern physics language and INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES EMPLOY INTEGRATION as in the FULL WAVE-FIELD; i.e. the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and the MALE ASSERTING CONIUNCTIO OPPOSITORUM wherein BALANCE comes into play. ‘BALANCE’ is A SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY which impacts the overall GESTALT of the transforming relational continuum as implied by the Yin/Yang symbol.
DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE: ‘The Town is growing, developing and producing products’. This is one-sided MALE ASSERTING as if in EMPTY SPACE (no FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE) is given a foundational role in (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT Languages (Common Average European languages) which embodies the BINARY LOGIC relation.
INTEGRATION based LANGUAGE: ‘There is Towning in the Transforming landscape’ This is an ANDROGYNOUS CONJUGATE of FEMALE accommodating landscape and MALE asserting Towning.’ (INDIGENOUS Aboriginal and Modern physics ‘Reheomode’ (Bohm) aka WAVE-FIELD mode language which embodies THE QUANTUM LOGIC relation..
-7- INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURES and Buddhism/Taoism and Advaita Vedanta employ language architectures wherein the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGAT) is in a PRIMACY over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT as in ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’. This is the QUANTUM LOGIC structure wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING (transforming landscape) and the MALE ASSERTING (the emergent TOWNING) are ONE ANDROGYNOUS (WAVE-FIELD) dynamic. In other words MATERIAL figure and WAVE-FIELD ground are ONE. FIGURE and GROUND are ONE because the MATERIAL FIGURE is a CONDENSATION of the all-including WAVE-FIELD GROUND. INTEGRATION is in a natural primacy over DIFFERENTIATION due to the all-including WAVE-FIELD. It is important to get this right in LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL languages, and Modern physics WAVE-FIELD based (ANDROGYNOUS) languages DO get it right, … BUT NOT WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is DIFFERENTIATION based.
-8- WESTERN CULTURE MEDICINE, JUSTICE and COMMERCE are all LANGUAGE-based CULTURAL PROTOCOLS that are screwed up by the choice of DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE which is, in other words, BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE which gives a foundational role to the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to INVENT LOCAL AUTHORING, as pointed out by Nietzsche. THERE IS NO LOCAL AUTHORING IN MODERN PHYSICS interpretations of reality because there is an ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD wherein EVERYTHING is in FLUX. WESTERN MEDICINE, JUSTICE and COMMERCE give the DOUBLE ERROR based (grammatical) abstraction of LOCAL AUTHORING a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE which is a SCREW-UP (Nietzsche mocks this by pointing out that GRAMMAR is being given GOD-like LOCAL CREATION POWERS within WESTERN CULTURE LANGUISTIC REPRESENTATIONS).
Our Western Culture RETURN from DIFFERENTIATING to BALANCING0
SUMMARY: Indigenous aboriginal language architecture is based on INTEGRATION while WESTERN CULTURE language architecture is based on DIFFERENTIATION. The FRAGMENTATIVE nature of DIFFERENTIATION is responsible for DROP-OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE in the representational capability of the language architecture. What this DROP-OUT does is to reduce the REPRESENTATIONS of LANGUAGES such as ENGLISH and the Common Average European Languages (Whorf’s classification) to ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ACTION and DEVELOPMENT-ONLY REPRESENTATION capability which REDUCES the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPT of BALANCE to the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC CONCEPT OF DIFFERENCE. This ESSAY describes the CULTURE-SHIFTING IMPACT of ‘DUMBING DOWN’ QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC.
* * *
BELIEVE IT OR NOT, OUR WESTERN CULTURE IS SUBSTITUTING DIFFERENCE FOR BALANCE.
DIFFERENCE is the BINARY LOGIC REDUCTION OF QUANTUM LOGIC BALANCE.
INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LINGUISTIC UNDERSTANDING IS BASED ON “BALANCE” (QUANTUM LOGIC) WHEREAS WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC UNDERSTANDING IS BASED ON “DIFFERENCE” (BINARY LOGIC)
BALANCE and DIFFERENCE offer us TWO APPROACHES to language design based on QUANTUM LOGIC and BINARY LOGIC.
The RELATIONSHIP between the CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD and the WAVE-FIELD is one of BALANCE, not DIFFERENCE.
NOTA BENE: ‘BALANCE’ IS ‘LESS SIMPLE’ THAN ‘DIFFERENCE’ AND ‘BALANCE’ IS SENSUAL WHILE ‘DIFFERENCE’ IS INTELLECTUAL.
An example of QUANTUM LOGIC (BALANCE) approach to language is where we capture a picture in terms of; ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’. Here we CAN see a FIGURE (an item of CONTENT) in a RESONATING or BALANCING BASED INTEGRATION with its CONTAINING GROUND (CONTAINER) wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE. Alternatively, we CAN see FIGURE and GROUND as TWO which is the BINARY LOGIC (DIFFERENTIATION) based approach to language capture.
BOTH QUANTUM LOGIC “BALANCING BASED INTEGRATION” and BINARY LOGIC “DIFFERENTIATION” offer themselves as VIABLE FOUNDATIONS FOR A LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and these TWO ARCHITECTURES are what DISTINGUISHES the languages of INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS (along with Buddhists/Taoists and Advaita Vedanta adherents), … and , … THE WEST (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT LANGUAGE USERS).
THESE DIFFERING LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES PUT US, PSYCHOLOGICALLY, INTO TWO DIFFERENT LANGUAGE-BASED “REALITY ARCHITECTURES”, the ONE employing QUANTUM BALANCING BASED INTEGRATION, where we fashion such linguistic representations as the QUANTUM LOGIC ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ , and the other being where we fashion linguistic representations using BINARY LOGIC; ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’.
* * * * * * * * * *
The WESTERN ERROR of Putting DIFFERENTIATION before INTEGRATION in LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE0
PREFACE: DIFFERENTIATION is a simple BINARY LOGIC concept that, when used in problem-solving, is like the implanting of the Cuckoo’s egg that infuses a TOO-SIMPLE nest-occupying that substitutes for the LESS-SIMPLE arrangement which is the natural, rightful occupier. This is a metaphor for our WESTERN CULTURE habit of using too-simple BINARY LOGIC based linguistic representations to convey complex aspects of our less-simple sense-experience phenomena that require QUANTUM LOGIC representation. The more we become habituated with using simple BINARY LOGIC NEED-FILLERS where QUANTUM LOGIC RESOLVING is needed, the more we simply SILENCE the DEMAND the unsatisfied demand for resolving the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC PROBLEMS.
For example, the problem of IMBALANCE is a QUANTUM LOGIC problem which may be over-simplistically perceived as a BANARY LOGIC problem; for example, the problem of a RICH and POOR IMBALANCE that manifests as a proliferation of RE-BALANCING AGENTS that in BINARY LOGIC terms are THIEVES or PATHOGENS since the greater simplicity of BINARY LOGIC limits representation to “EITHER” correct behaviour “OR” incorrect behaviour, whereas BALANCE and IMBALANCE are understandings coming from QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING medium.
While BINARY LOGIC is capable of informing us in EITHER/OR terms of whether we are INCREASING the area of cultivated land, say from 300 acres to 5000 acres, we would need the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC to inform us on the changing BALANCE of cultivated (monoculture) land to wilderness diversity land. On a sphere with a surface area of 5100 acres, the one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY BINARY LOGIC measure of GROWTH of cultivated land, while ACCURATE and TRUE, is TOO SIMPLE to capture the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING medium. The BINARY LOGIC based GROWTH implies that the GROWTH is relative to an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE where there is only the sense of MALE ASSERTING ‘GROWTH’ and NO sense of a CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING which is an OPEN BUT LIMITING SPACE as in the area on the surface of a sphere.
The BINARY LOGIC based language concept of GROWTH of a DIFFERENTIATED BEING is SIMPLE in that it is based on the assumption that the DIFFERENTIATED BEING resides in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT while the corresponding QUANTUM LOGIC based assumption involves the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where we now bring into “play” (i.e. into psychological comprehension) the awareness of BALANCE as in the progressive FILLING UP BY MALE ASSERTING GROWTH of a FINITE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING SPACE.
Thus, our linguistic representation in one-sided RATIO-NAL terms of GROWTH is TOO SIMPLE (it is in effect assuming an absolute infinite empty containing space) because there is an evident need for a LESS SIMPLE linguistic representation, seeing that the CROPLANDS are in a SPHERICAL SPACE so that the sense-experience reality comprehends the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS AREA in CONJUGATE RELATION to the GROWING of the CULTIVATED AREA. Thus the requirement for a less simple QUANTUM LOGIC relation this capable of conveying BALANCE in the sense of the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING medium as represented graphically with the Yin/Yang symbol which implies that in a spherical space, as it fills with one MALE-ASSERTING thing, there is a conjugate shrinking of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING openness. For example in the spherical space on the surface of a sphere, as more of the surface area is cultivated or industrialized, there is a simultaneous, conjugate SHRINKAGE of WILDERNESS DIVERSITY.
Because of the SPHERICAL FINITE SPACE limitation (which doesn’t come into play with ‘GROWTH’ since GROWTH assumes ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING SELF-REFERENCING ‘RATIO’ WITHIN an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE), we have, in the finite spherical space, BOTH the MALE ASSERTING GROWTH in a RELATIONSHIP with a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE within a FINITE INCLUDING MEDIUM. This “IS” the configuration captured in the Yin/Yang symbol where the circle conveys the finite space of the sphere and the darker fill implies the FEMALE while the brighter fill implies the MALE.
In BINARY LOGIC we have the SIMPLE EITHER/OR choice of OPPOSITES (black and white, right and wrong) while in QUANTUM LOGIC we have the LESS SIMPLE BOTH/AND choice of BALANCE and IMBALANCE. While the European colonizer tends to think in the BINARY LOGIC terms of the desirable GROWTH of CROPLANDS as if in a FLAT PLANE of INFINITE EXTENT, the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL tends to think in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms of the desirable BALANCE of WILDERNESS and CULTIVATED CROPLANDS within a SPHERICAL SPACE of FINITE EXTENT.
DIFFERENTIATION is a LANGUAGE base qualifier that employs BINARY LOGIC to FRAGMENT the language-based representation of our sense-experience reality (of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum) so as to SEPARATE OUT a relational feature in the flow, such as the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, setting it up as a notional LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF (‘BEING’); i.e. ‘the TOWN’ whereupon GRAMMAR can be used in a LANGUAGE based representation scheme to impute LOCAL AUTHORING POWER as captured in the SIMPLE expression ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services (this exemplifies the ‘Cuckoo’s egg’ SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY injection which LOCKS OUT the needed LESS SIMPLE NON-LOCAL and IMPLICIT QUANTUM LOGIC sense-experience consistent linguistic representation; e.g. ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.
While DIFFERENTIATION and its COHORT, BINARY LOGIC, are given a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in WESTERN CULTURE language based REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS, INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURES, by contrast, employ the LESS SIMPLE but QUANTUM LOGIC based INTEGRATION in the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in LANGUAGE.
The INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL QUANTUM LOGIC expression, ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ captures the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM relationship where the TOWNING is NOT “A LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF’ but a relational resonance feature within the transforming relational continuum, which does not SEPARATE from the all-including transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD. This LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC REPRESENTION in terms of TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE serves a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE system and does not suffer the fate of being LOCKED OUT as in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE schemes, in a Cuckoo’s Egg like caper, by the MORE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based language architecture.
* * *
EXAMPLE of the LOCK-OUT of QUANTUM LOGIC language construction by BINARY LOGIC language construction.
A RICH AND POOR IMBALANCE (QUANTUM LOGIC) that is inducing the PROLIFERATION of REBALANCERS, MISLABELLED as PATHOGENS, that is inducing the PROLIFERATION of REBLANCERS (misidentified as pathogens), may be temporarily subdued by ANTI-PATHOGEN remedies (such as removal by police) but because the IMBALANCE persists, NEW REBALANCER VARIANTS will continue to EMERGE pending resolution of the DEEPER, QUANTUM LOGIC ISSUE OF IMBALANCE. WESTERN CULTURE MEDICINE, JUSTICE and COMMERCE is MESMERIZED by the popular Cuckoo’s egg like SUBSTITUTING of TOO SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based ATTACKING PATHOGEN INTERPRETATIONS of LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC IMBALANCE phenomena where the REMEDY is the QUANTUM LOGIC RESTORING of BALANCE rather than the BINARY LOGIC ELIMINATION OF PATHOGENS.
THE WESTERN CULTURE hang-up on BINARY LOGIC misinterpretation of relational IMBALANCE as ‘the attack of pathogens’ leads WESTERN MEDICINE into attempts to eliminate PATHOGENS without addressing IMBALANCE. While ANTI-PATHOGEN remedies (such as removal of pathogens by police or other anti-pathogen means) may show temporary remission of symptoms, because the root issue is imbalance, NEW REBALANCER VARIANTS will continue to emerge until the deeper, QUANTUM LOGIC issue of IMBALANCE is resolved, and while the misguided ANTI-PATHOGEN response, may deliver temporary respite, its action of eliminating the REBALANCERS will be paving the way for the emergence of NEW VARIANTS of QUANTUM LOGIC REBALANCERS mistaken for BINARY LOGIC PATHOGENS.
There is a congruency between the SIMPLE and LESS SIMPLE relationship of BINARY LOGIC and QUANTUM LOGIC and the relationship between DIFFERENTIATION (FIGURE and GROUND are TWO) and INTEGRATION (FIGURE and GROUND are ONE)
* * * end of preface * * *
PREFACE NOTES on Martine’s Integral Adventure0
PREFACE: I am adding a few follow-up “NOTES on Martine’s Integral Adventure as background to try to get around THE LIMITATIONS OF LANGUAGE, because in this case, the “STORY” is about the SHIFT from this general type of language I am right now using, which is a DIFFERENTIATION based language (as all the European language are) where we fragment things as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which “DIFFERENTIATES OUT” a notional “BEING-BASED THING-IN-ITSELF” called ‘THE TOWN”, … to an INTEGRATION based language that speaks in terms of “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, as is the architecture of Indigenous aboriginal languages, which gives a foundational role to INTEGRATIVE CONTEXT as in ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.
In the INTEGRATION based language architecture of the indigenous aboriginals, we LET GO OF THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT because this DIFFERENTIATION based FRAGMENTING approach to constructing REPRESENTATIONS of our sense-experience reality is TOO LIMITING and involves DROPOUT of information essential to the INTEGRATING of BOTH CONTENT (MALE-ASSERTING) and CONTAINER (FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING). For example, INTEGRATION captures the relations between the male asserting “TOWNING” which is conjoined with the female-accommodating “VALLEY”. This is the QUANTUM LOGIC view where, as stones are pulled from valley, DEEPENING the valley, the TOWN as a collective of STONE CONSTRUCTIONS is RISING UP, so that what is REALLY going on is the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE which is the ANDROGYNOUS union of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING deepening of the valley and the MALE ASSERTING growth of the TOWNING.
NOTA BENE: Languages such as English and the Common Average European family of languages (Whorf’s classification) employ DIFFERENTIATION to SELECT THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE; i.e. the “GROWING TOWN” and simply IGNORE the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING VALLEY HOLE produced by the extraction of materials, and this IGNORING or “IGNORANCE” sets up a SUBSTITUTE REALITY where GROWTH (and NOT “TRANSFORMATION”) is the language based pseudo-reality. This is just “our” WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE DESIGN, which appeals because of ITS GREATER SIMPLICITY thanks to the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE CONJUGATE of INTEGRATION (the common valley in which the towns are included) from our ANDROGYNOUS (INTEGRATING wave-trough-valley-DIFFERENTING wave-peak-town) co-comprising WAVE-FIELD REALITY, means that what our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is dealing with (only the MALE aspect) is NO LONGER CONSISTENT WITH OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY but is now the basis for a SIMPLIFIED, ONE-SIDED, MALE-ASSERTING ONLY ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ which nevertheless ‘WORKS’ for communications purposes since all of the users of this language are MAKING THE SAME MISTAKE in dropping out the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE
Since everyone is using the ‘short-cut’ involved in saying ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which drops out the reality that the building materials for the town are extracted from the VALLEY so that what is REALLY going on as affirmed by our SENSE-EXPERIENCE as opposed to our language-based abstract constructions, is TRANFORMATION.
My point about THIS ENGLISH LANGUAGE I AM USING is that in our customary (standard) use of this type of language, WE DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE to SIMPLIFY our task of constructing language based representations, and even though we are right now DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, which makes our language based representations VERY UN-REALISTIC, this still ‘works’ for the COMMUNICATING and SHARING of what is now a DUMBED DOWN MALE-ASSERTING ONLY (SUBSTITUTE-) REALITY REPRESENTATION where can speak of the ‘GROWTH OF THE TOWN’ without mentioning the conjugate SHRINKAGE of the VALLEY due to the extraction of materials employed in the construction of the TOWN (i.e. there is a material balance here which is ignored because we quietly assume we are lining in a FLAT SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT rather than in the space on surface of SPHERE). I am not suggesting that we do this CONSCIOUSLY, but I am suggesting that this is the implication of our DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and SPEAKING AS IF WE WERE LIVING IN A FLAT SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT where there is no FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE so that WE DO NOT HAVE TO ACCOUNT FOR THE REALITY THAT OUR EXTRACTION OF MATERIALS IS ACTUALLY TRANSFORMING THE SPHERICAL PLENUM (aka the WAVE-FIELD) WE ARE INCLUDED IN.
SUFFICE IT TO SAY that the language we are now using, i.e. this WESTERN CULTURE brand of language with its one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY reality-constructing architecture, is DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, the price we pay for putting our intellectually constructed SUBSTITUTE REALITY into the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY”. EXAMPLE, we now use language like ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, a one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY BINARY LOGIC PROPOSITION based on INTELLECTUAL DIFFERENTATION that separates the TOWNING from the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, … UNLIKE the indigenous aboriginal and Modern physics flow-based languages which fashion the equivalent of ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which retains the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and thus supports FULL ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING-MALE ASSERTING ‘WAVE-FIELD’ REALITY.
This longish PREFACE will be SOON FORGOTTEN as we continue reading because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are now PSYCHOLOGICALLY HABITUATED TO THE DROP OUT, IN LANGUAGE of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE which means that we are ‘used to’ working within the LANGUAGE-STIMULATED MENTAL IMAGERY that associates with a LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION based SUBSTITUTE REALITY where we believe that WE CAN SEE THE TOWN GROWING, even though this is NOT REAL but a language-stimulated abstraction obtained by DIFFERENTIATING OUT THE FIGURE FROM THE GROUND, the TOWNING from the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and setting it down, notionally, in an absolute empty and infinite space where we can INSPECT IT AS IF IT EXISTS A SEPARATE LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING based THING-IN-ITSELF, that we could extract from its innate inclusion in the transforming relational continuum, in the manner we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS can pick up a grasshopper, ignoring our and ‘its’ inclusion in the transforming relational continuum, and using DIFFERENTIATION as it we pull off its legs and wings to develop a mechanical understanding of that which, in reality, is like us, a CONDENSATION of the all-including transforming relational continuum aka WAVE-FIELD, understandable in terms of INTEGRATION, which is an understanding we BYPASS by employing DIFFERENTIATION, as we do with the grasshopper, first extracting the material form from its INTEGRATION within the overall ‘ecosystem’ or WAVE-FIELD, and then ‘getting to know it’ by breaking it down into a collection of material components as if it were a LOCAL, INDEPENDENT MACHINE, rather than a CONDENSATION of the ALL_INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.
WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is something we have ARCHITECTED on this abstract basis of BINARY LOGIC based DIFFERENTIATION, whereas INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE is consistent with Modern physics is acknowledging the need for an INTEGRATION based language which gives understanding in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms of CONDENSATIONS in the all-including WAVE-FIELD.
Now that we have discussed HOW SCREWED UP A DIFFERENTIATION BASED LANGUAGE IS, we can proceed with our DIFFERENTIATING LANGUAGE based ESSAY, because circumstances have put me and any potential readership, into this mode using a DUMBED-DOWN and PROBLEMATIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE for our communications.
One might ask me how I am, or if I am, going to avoid the booby-traps in this language I am using which DUMPS DOWN the communication to UNREALISTIC one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY constructions.
My answer is that this language IS CAPABLE of POINTING TO ITS OWN SHORTCOMINGS as in the sentence; ‘This language I am right now using has us saying stuff like ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING’ which is all one-sided MALE ASSERTING ACTION based when the task of using language to represent experiences from our sense-experience reality, needs be using language such as ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which incorporates both FEMALE ACCOMMODATING in conjugate relation with MALE ASSERTING as in the WAVE-FIELD nature of our sense-experience reality.
THERE, I WAS ABLE TO USE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO CONVEY THE LESS SIMPLE BUT MORE COMPLETE QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE-EXPERIENCE CONSISTENT REPRESENTATION OF ‘REALITY’ (I am keeping ‘reality’ in quotes because, as Korzybski might have said, “The linguistic representation is not the sense-experience reality).
SO, WHAT DOES THIS SAY ABOUT THE SHORTFALLS OF OUR ENGLISH LANGUAGE VIS A VIS CONSTRUCTING REPRESENTATIONS OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY?
If we reflect on it for a moment, we will see that the BIG WRENCH IN THE WORKS is our WESTERN CULTURE use, in our language based constructions of a go-by SUBSTITUTE REALITY, of the abstract concept of BEING that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ‘CREATE’ with ‘NAMING’. NAMING invents LOCAL INDEPENDENT “BEING” THINGS_IN-THEMSELVES that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS USE TO LINGUISTICALLY ‘FRAGMENT’ REALITY by ‘DIFFERENTIATING’ and thus ‘SEPARATING OUT’ relational forms in the transforming relational continuum
and from there, inventing our own constructions of reality on the abstract based of animating the NAMING INSTANTIATED BEING-THINGS that we have used language based DIFFERENTIATION to ‘NOTIONALLY SPLIT OUT’ of the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD, and USE THESE LINGUISTIC ABSTRACTION BASED “INDEPENDENT BEINGS”, re-animating them with GRAMMAR in LANGUAGE, to construct a BEING-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY REPRESENTATION.
SUCCESS! WE HAVE USED OUR FRAGMENTION BASED LANGUAGE; i.e. our DIFFERENTIATION BASED LANGUAGE, to CONSTRUCT GRAMMAR ANIMATED FRAGMENT BASED REPRESENTATIONS AS BEHAVIOUR GUIDING ‘GO-BYS’. The DOWNSIDE is that in the real world of our sense-experience, all material forms are CONDENSATIONS of an all-including WAVE-FIELD in which case COORDINATION of the apparent FRAGMENTS is assured because THEY ARE NOT, IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, ‘FRAGMENT’ but are instead ‘CONDENSATIONS’ of the all-including WAVE-FIELD aka the transforming relational continuum.
DANGER! Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, by its IMPUTING OF ‘BEING’ to relational forms in the flow, is creating a FRAGMENTED ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY” featuring notional INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BODIES in ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE (GOODBYE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD). THE CONNECTING SUBSTANCE OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD IS THUS REMOVES FROM OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE AND WE ARE LEFT WITH AN ASSORTMENT OF NAMING-INSTANTIATED ‘BEING’ BASED ABSTRACTIONS WHOSE MOVEMENTS AND INTERACTIONS “WE MUST INVENT” USING THE ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ COMBINATION OF ‘NAMING AND GRAMMAR’ SO AS TO CONSTRUCT A USABLE BINARY LOGIC (MATTER AND EMPTY SPACE BASED) SUBSTITUTE REALITY, FOR LINGUISTIC SHARING PURPOSES. Of course, what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have as our language based sharing capability, is a capability for sharing BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITIES, which we have built from DIFFERENTIATING OUT the relational forms in the transforming relational continuum.
So, let’s take another look at the SHORTFALL in our ENGLISH LANGUAGE. It seems as if THE SHORTFALL IS NOT INTRINSIC IN THE LANGUAGE PER SE, but is coming from how we use the language, as in our assigning a foundational role to words imputing BEING.
“Nothing indeed has exercised a more simple power of persuasion hitherto than the error of Being, as it was formulated by the Eleatics for instance: in its favour are every word and every sentence that we utter!—Even the opponents of the Eleatics succumbed to the seductive powers of their concept of Being. Among others there was Democritus in his discovery of the atom. “Reason” in language!—oh what a deceptive old witch it has been! I fear we shall never be rid of God, so long as we still believe in grammar.”
The problem, as Nietzsche points out is BEING-based REASONING. The introducing of BEING in language is intrinsically FRAGMENTING. It introduces BINARY LOGIC via the ABSTRACTIONS of MATTER and SPACE and over-rides the innate fluidity of the all-including WAVE-FIELD dynamic that is foundational in “NATURE ”
So the problem is not our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES PER SE, but HOW WE USE OUR LANGUAGE and more specifically, our problem is our use of language to REASON’ which gives a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE to the abstraction of BEING which sets up the BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION of “EITHER” is “OR” is not’ which is TOO SIMPLE to adequately capture the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND structure of the transforming relational continuum wherein MATERIAL FORMS CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD so that the CONDENSATIONS are BOTH THEMSELVES AND AT THE SAME TIME THE WAVE-FIELD THEY ARE INCLUDED IN.
It is clear that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE … DROPS OUT A LOT, … by its BUILT-IN BINARY LOGIC FOUNDATION using the abstract concept of BEING which lets us FRAGMENT REALITY in our LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION SCHEME, by equipping ourselves with what is really the tool of DIFFERENTIATION which lets us, notionally, EXTRACT from the transforming relational continuum, a dynamic that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as everything is in flux, a selection of FIGURES seen NOT AS WHORLS IN FLOW but at as LOCAL BEINGS thanks to the powers of LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION where we extract ‘the TOWN that is GROWING’ from our starting sense-experience impression that there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.
While there is some REDUNDANCY in these above words, the point that is intended is that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is based on DIFFERENTIATION which DROPS OUT the relational connections that are retained in an INTEGRATION based language architecture. DIFFERENTIATION brings with it the BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION of MATERIAL BEINGS, the ‘existence’ of which are determined by the simple “EITHER” is “OR” is not ‘reasoning’ test.
Once we have invented BEINGS by DIFFERENTIATING the relational continuum, and are using BEINGS in a foundational role in architecting our language based representation scheme, GRAMMAR is needed to construct a SYNTHETIC MATERIAL REALITY based on the actions and developments of the invented BEINGS. This DIFFERENTIATION based DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based construction of a LOCAL AUTHORING a based LINGUISTIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY, while it supports interpersonal communications, does so at the price of POPULARIZING synthetic SUBSTITUTE REALITIES that are FRAGMENTATION BASED. As Bohm points out, this is NOT ONLY serving up language-based FRAGMENTED VIEWS of the WORLD, it is FRAGMENTING our understanding of OURSELVES bringing on, as a WESTERN CULTURE INBUILT EXPOSURE, SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA.
BOTTOM LINE: We live in a world of pervasive INTEGRATION characteristic of the transforming relational continuum (WAVE-FIELD) while we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS put together language based SUBSTITUTE REALITY representations making it APPEAR as if we were living in a DIFFERENTIATED world of INDEPENDENT MATERIAL OBJECTS IN EMPTY SPACE.
Martine experienced what it is like to come to the understanding, through her ‘systems sciences’ investigations, of arriving at an understanding that cannot simply be shared as “A NEW PIECE OF UNDERSTANDING” that the recipient can ADD to their COLLECTION OF SUCH UNDERSTANDINGS, but in order to be able to assimilate this NEW UNDERSTANDING, must (A) construct a new and more comprehensive QUANTUM LOGIC CAPABLE STORAGE FACILITY, and (B) REVISE one’s ENTIRE EXISTING BINARY LOGIC based INVENTORY OF UNDERSTANDINGS to the new (QUANTUM LOGIC) STANDARD. As individuals, we CAN do this, but it involves giving up whatever STATUS we may have as LIVING EXPERTS in the DUMBED DOWN WORLD OF BINARY LOGIC-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, meaning, EXPERTS that enjoy WESTERN CULTURE recognition and rewarding for EXPERT STATUS, and as a result, our COLLECTIVE UNDERSTANDING progresses, as Max Planck suggested, “with the death of EXPERTS”.
WESTERN CULTURE EXPERTS are predominantly BINARY LOGIC ADEPT EXPERTS who have the ability to consistently come up with the BEST ANSWERS, … ALBEIT WITHIN THE NARROW CONTEXT of Goedel’s Theorem, of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite systems of BINARY LOGIC. The farmer who manages to cultivate more crops and produce more output than his peers is part of a system that REWARDS and RECOGNIZES on the basis of MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, … BUT THIS BINARY LOGIC ASSESSMENT is BLIND to the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING SHRINKAGE OF WILDERNESS and thus BLIND to the QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY of INCLUSION in an ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM AKA “WAVE-FIELD”. Our COLLECTIVE UNDERSTANDING in a QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE will thus progress with the death of BINARY LOGIC EXPERTS.
* * * end-of-preface * * *
Martine’s Integral Adventure0
Preface: This essay highlights important but popularly-overlooked findings in regard to how different LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES can help to either CONVEY or CONCEAL relational understandings of a ‘systems science’ and Modern physics nature, with an upfront acknowledgement of the contribution of Martine Dodds-Taljaard. These understandings elucidate on the troubling dysfunctions of modern era social dynamics which arise from LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION and INTEGRATION, that impact psychological and physical ‘balance and well-being’ in a CULTURE-specific manner.
* * *
Martine Dodds-Taljaard (“June 20, 1947- 2001) is an exceptionally clear-thinking ‘systems thinker’ who was never confused by the WESTERN CULTURE penchant for that popular deviousness of ‘analytical thinking‘ that FRAGMENTS complexity born of global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence (characteristic of Wave-Field reality), as if ‘analysis’ were a pathway to understanding such complexity. But by chopping out a mechanistic skeleton of reality with the reductionist tool of pre-modern physics ‘analytical science’, we DISCARD, in the DIFFERENTIATING process, ‘the INTEGRATING baby as if it were the dirty bath water’, or in other words, we toss out the relational WAVE-FIELD magic of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “INTEGRATION” as if it were secondary to linguistically-imposed LOCAL AND EXPLICIT ‘DIFFERENTIATION; … as if the TOWNING in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT transforming landscape could be ANALYTICALLY extracted and reconceived of in terms of a LOCAL and EXPLICIT “BEING” based development.’ RE-INSTATING the INTEGRAL to its natural PRIMACY over the DIFFERENTIATED is an upstream battle in our WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC CRIPPLED mindsets.
“I am not surreptitious or devious – I am very straightforward, which is probably why I am often blackballed.” –Martine
However, being straightforward with those who are promoting a worldview in the abstract terms of DECLARATIONS of INDEPENDENCE and other intellectual abstraction based forms of FRAGMENTATION, ‘will not fly’ in the systems sciences mode of comprehension, an INTEGRATIVE mode of comprehension that is often reviled in our WESTERN CULTURE social collectives where the trend is to progressive fragmentation (eg. LGBTQ) sold on the basis of ‘suboptimization’, a modern-day WESTERN CULTURE ‘psychologically confused pursuit’ that Martine critiques citing systems science pioneer Kenneth Boulding, ‘the Name of the Devil if Suboptimization’.
The ERROR of A NAMING-based Declaration of Independence, backed up by a SECOND ERROR of GRAMMAR constitutes a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based IMPRESSION of LOCAL AUTHORING, critiqued by Nietzsche (Martine’s philosopher of choice) as the synthetic source of THE ERRONEOUS IMPRESSION OF LOCAL AUTHORING.
Declarations of Independence may achieve the desired popular intellectual conceptualizing without any support whatsoever from physical sense-experiencing, yet once the abstract notion of LOCAL BEING is established in the INTELLECT as a launching pad for GRAMMAR GIVING LOCAL AUTHORING, we have the building materials for constructing SUBSTITUTE REALITIES that let us choose an arbitrary starting location, thus FRAGMENTING the WAVE-FIELD CONTINUUM of our sense-experience.
While our sense-experience affirms our inclusion “in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence”, or in other words an INTEGRAL world, our language-stimulated intellect opens the door to BINARY LOGIC based DIFFERENTIATION or in other words ‘FRAGMENTATION’, by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR wherein, for example, the LOCAL TOWN EITHER EXISTS OR DOES NOT EXIST.
Once we choose the simple “DOES EXIST” option, this satisfies our BINARY LOGIC based linguistic reality constructing scheme, thus SHUTTING OUT and OBSCURING the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC understanding option wherein THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.
THIS SHUTTING OUT of the QUANTUM LOGIC option amounts to OBSCURANTISM, where we GO FORWARD with our language construction based on the over-simplistic (and fragmentary) BINARY LOGIC based impression of the LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING of ‘the TOWN’. The point is that once BINARY LOGIC based language gets first dibs on REPRESENTATION, the BEING-based status of ‘the TOWN’ is CONCRETIZED, SHUTTING OUT the very possibility of the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding option that is in terms of TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which acknowledges our living “in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence”.
The BEING-based status of ‘the TOWN’, on the other hand, sets up the FRAGMENTATION-SUPPORTING linguistic abstraction of LOCAL BEING-based AUTHORING as in; ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, and PRODUCING goods. This linguistic DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR construction supports a PSYCHOLOGICALLY MISTAKEN IMPRESSION of the possibility of LOCAL-BEING based SUB-OPTIMIZATION’.
“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionist scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard (International Society of Systems Sciences)
The following essay is congruent with the work of my friend, Martine, whose pioneering systems sciences work, although it currently remains an ‘outlier’ in a world obsessed with language-based fragmentation, is sorely needed to resolve the problematic persistence of intellectual-abstraction based fragmentation in WESTERN CULTURE thinking and social relating.
* * * * * * * * * *
THE BIG LIE: The Linguistic Fabrication of BEING0
The BIG LIE is a phenomenon which has been exploited by politicians. It is written about by Hitler in Mein Kampf. If the lie is small, the man on the street will call us out on it. But when the lie is huge, and coming with the backing of ‘authorities’, as we have seen recently with Donald Trump and the BIG LIE that ‘the election was fraudulent’ and that ‘Trump was really the winner’, many people will believe ‘the big lie’.
There are BIG LIES that divide the world, and the one that has caught my attention is the BIG LIE OF “BEING” of the WESTERN CULTURE that I have grown up in. How can BEING co-exist with a fluid world?
“In the writing of Heraclitus, to a larger degree than ever before, the images do not impose their burden of concreteness but are entirely subservient to the achievement of clarity and precision”
“Heraclitus had declared ‘being’ a perpetual ‘becoming’ and had correlated the two concepts with his ‘hidden attunement.’ Now Parmenides declared the two to be mutually exclusive, and only ‘being’ to be real.” — ‘The Intellectual Adventure of Ancient Man’, — ‘Henri Frankfort, H. A. Frankfort, John A. Wilson, Thorkild Jacobsen, and William A. Irwin.
The SOURCE of the BEING based world is DIFFERENTIATION as in the BINARY LOGIC SPLIT between the MATERIAL PARTICLE and EMPTY SPACE, and from THIS MOST ELEMENTAL BEING, a language architecture follows which is based on DIFFERENTIATION out the LOCAL and EXPLICIT where, in the end, everything can be understood in the context similar to that of the Russian doll, the Matryoshka, where the larger forms are built up from smaller forms so that in order to understand what might be termed the MACRO-REALITY, we can break it down into a parts-wise MICRO-REALITY. This BEING based worldview is a BINARY LOGIC worldview based on MALE ASSERTING ACTION of MATERIAL BEING-based STRUCTURES MOVING AND INTERACTING in EMPTY SPACE..
By contrast, the SOURCE of the BECOMING-based world is INTEGRATION rather than DIFFERENTIATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) as in the formation of clouds which are ACCUMULATIONS arising from the INTEGRATION of CONDENSATIONS of the energy-charged PLENUM they are included in. This INTEGRATION-BASED SHAPE-SHIFTING COMPRISED BY FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ACTION gives rise to FORMINGS WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING PLENUM. These FORMINGS within the TRANSFORMING as relate with QUANTUM LOGIC (the BOTH/AND logic of the including medium.
NOTA BENE! The language-based world of INTEGRATION where local forms are INCLUSIONS in the all-including energy-charge PLENUM so that ALL ARE RELATED, may be ambiguously captured in language by REDUCING their QUANTUM LOGIC FIGURE-INCLUDED-IN-GROUND relation with LANGUAGE that Re-presents them as “FORMS” within an EMPTY CONTAINING SPACE, creating a language-based SIMLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, a SUBSTITUTE REALITY that can be extended and adapted and maintained on the basis of the BINARY LOGIC architecture of MUTUALLY EXCLUDING material objects and empty space.
Most Recent Comments