Archive for January, 2024

How Sorcery Persists in the WESTERN CULTURE World View

0

AUTHOR’S PREFACE:

The term “SORCERY” commonly refers to Magic (supernatural), the application of beliefs, rituals or actions  employed to subdue or manipulate natural or supernatural beings and sorces. —Wikipedia” 

In my philosophical investigations, as in those of others such as Nietzsche, Bohm and Schroedinger, it is EVIDENT that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is used to INCORRECTLY impute LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS (i.e. SOURCING POWERS) to figuratively manipulate things so that they are seemingly given life and existence by way of the common ritual of NAMING, along with POWERS of LOCAL SOURCING (unreal) with the “magic” of GRAMMAR.   The NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT influences of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD are thus re-cast in the form of material BEINGS, notionally endowed with their own POWERS of LOCALLY SOURCING actions and developments.

For example, while the reality is that there is“TOWNING within the fully fluid context of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX”,  in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, in place of acknowledging the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT nature of dynamics, we make the COMMON ERROR of imputing “LOCAL SOURCING” as in the construction of  “the TOWN IS GROWING”, though this LOCAL SOURCING of GROWTH is UNREAL and it falls into the category of ‘human manipulating of natural beings and forces”.

 

The GROWTH OF THE TOWN is IMPOSSIBLE WITHOUT CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS in which case, THERE IS NO LOCAL SOURCING as in “GROWTH” of something LOCAL and EXPLICIT but TRANSFORMATION that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

 

In reality, there are “humanings in the transforming relational continuum aka the energy-charged PLENUM” and there are NO SUCH THINGS as HUMANS that are BEINGS with POWERS OF LOCALLY SOURCING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.  That ERRONEOUS (but common in WESTERN CULTURE) impression is coming from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.

 

In other words, we (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS) are commonly using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to contrive the impression of LOCAL AUTHORING, and this LOCAL SOURCING has the credentials of SORCERY in that where we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’‘, we are implying LOCAL SOURCING  of this action and development which is NOT REAL but simply the impression gleaned from our use of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.  WHAT IS REAL is that …’there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ and there is NO LOCAL SOURCING involved since ‘The TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, being included within the overall TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’;.

 

That is, the notion of LOCAL SOURCING derives from the WESTERN CULTURE practice of SIMPLIFYING our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING which we have made DIFFICULT (complicated) upfront by imputing a BINARY LOGIC, MATERIAL BEING-IN-EMPTY-SPACE based FOUNDATION in place of the actual QUANTUM LOGIC ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM with its MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS.

 

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ a BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING in our rhetoric; i.e. a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, that reduces (notionally) the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.

 

In MODERN PHYSICS as also in indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, THERE IS NO “CONJURING UP”, with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, of LOCAL POWERS OF SOURCING actions and developments as there is in the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIOATIONS of WESTERN CULTURE, and instead, EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, as is the nature of the all-including WAVE-FIELD world we live in where material forms are CONDENSINGS in which case THERE IS NO LOCAL SOURCING as is FOUNDATIONAL in COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.

 

THE WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, in this manner, gives a foundational role to the application of “beliefs and actions employed to manipulate natural beings and forces” by using propositions such as “The TOWN IS GROWING” which, by DROPPING OUT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of WILDERNESS, impute LOCAL SOURCING POWERS that DO NOT EXIST, to the TOWN.

 

However which way we DRESS THIS ACTION UP IN WORDS, it is EVIDENT that SOMETHING that LOOKS, SMELLS and TASTES like “SORCERY” lurks within what LINGUACIST BENJAMIN WHORF classifies as COMMON, AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE.  As Bohm points out, this IMPUTING of LOCAL SOURCING POWERS to notional NAMING-INSTANTIATED THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES with GRAMMAR is the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANISM; i.e. the FRAGMENTATION of using NAMING to IMPUTE INDEPENDENT BEING to NAMING-instantiated TOWNS and the OBSCURANTISM of DROPPING OUT OF OUR MENTAL  ACKNOWLEDGING, the SHRINKING WILDERNESS that is CONJUGATE to the “APPEARANCE” and “GROWING” of “TOWNS”. 

 

The CONJUGATE RELATION of SHRINKING WILDERNESS and GROWING TOWN is NOT a ‘SIMPLE CONJUGATE RELATION’ as involves the MECHANICS of TWO SEPARATE THINGS, CLINKING into a CONJUGATE RELATION LIKE TWO RAILWAY CARS HOOKING UP TOGETHER, but a COMPLEX AFFILIATION with REAL and IMAGINARY components  where the RESIDENTS OF THE GROWING TOWN are not only AWARE of the INNATE RELATIONAL GATHERING-SCATTERING NATURE of what is better understood in the DYNAMIC TERMS OF ‘TOWNING’ since the developing MATERIAL STRUCTURE is like the ‘the CLUSTER”  or dynamic GATHERING-SCATTERING CLUSTERING of ants induced by some ATTRACTOR such as a DROP OF HONEY or TRADING CENTER. The IMPRESSION of A PERSISTING BEING or LOCAL, EXPLICIT ‘ENVELOPE’ or ‘CLUSTER’ does not OVER-RIDE the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT NATURE of the overall TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE within which the RESONANT RELATIONAL FORM is an “APPEARANCE” within the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

 

Here we see the BINARY LOGIC —QUANTUM LOGIC LINGISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING DIFFERENCE that underlies the expression “EAST is EAST and WEST is WEST and NEVER the TWAIN SHALL MEET” (Rudyard Kipling). 

 

While the “WEST” employs LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that uses SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC such as the PROPOSITION “THE TOWN IS GROWING”, … without acknowledging the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate”  (i.e. here, there is PERSISTING BEING in the form of a LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL OBJECT (the TOWN) where the LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL OBJECT IS THE ONLY THING “MOVING” or “CHANGING”), … the “EAST” employs LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC based as with the PROPOSITION “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”  (i.e. here, EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, where theTOWNING is INCLUDED IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.

By the “WEST” , I am referring to the WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING approach, and by the “EAST”, I am referring to the QUANTUM LOGIC, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING approach.

ACHTUNG! … NOTA BENE!…

It is imortant to keep in mind the intrinsic difference between simple BINARY LOGIC in that it “IS NOT CAPABLE” of QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION while QUANTUM LOGIC “IS CAPABLE” of QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.  This has already been mentioned but it is tricky because it concerns the difference in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES associated with BINARY LOGIC versus QUANTUM LOGIC; i.e. this example was already given but I am repeating it because it is KEY to understanding how we are using LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that can either DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate or INCLUDE IT.

THE WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, in this manner, gives a foundational role to the application of “beliefs and actions employed to manipulate natural beings and forces” by using propositions such as “The TOWN IS GROWING” which, by DROPPING OUT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of WILDERNESS, impute LOCAL SOURCING POWERS that DO NOT EXIST, to the TOWN.

Consider the relationship between ‘the TOWN’ and ‘the WILDERNESS’ first of all in a FLAT SPACE WORLD, and then again ini a SPHERICAL SPACE WORLD (the spherical space equates to the WAVE-FIELD).

In the FLAT SPACE, the TOWN can GROW in a one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING manner WITHOUT THERE BEING ANY FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE because that only arises in a SPHERICAL SPACE or WAVE-FIELD.  Thus we are perfectly correct in using the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING when the TOWN grows on a FLAT PLANE.  CONVERSELY, by USING BINARY LOGIC, WE IMPOSE THE SIMPLE FLAT SPACE CONDITION ON OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS AND THAT IS A MISTAKE BECAUSE WE LIVE IN A WAVE-FIELD WORLD WHICH REQUIRED WAVE-FIELD CAPABLE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION such as in Bohm’s Rheomode language, and in the indigenous aboriginal languages, the Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta use of language (as in the flow-based examples of Zen guru Alan Watts).

When we consider the relationship between ‘the TOWN’ and ‘the WILDERNESS’ in the CURVED SPACE WORLD aka the WAVE-FIELD WORLD, this must included “BOTH” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE AND the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, … in their TOGETHER STATE as a “CONIUNCTIO OPPOSITORUM”, they are INVISIBLE.  The material CONDENSATIONS are what we can SEE, yet the WAVE-FIELD is the PRIMARY PHENOMENON.  This is why BEING-based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING DOES NOT WORK (leads to FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM) and why we need a FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME such as the indigenous aboriginal languages.

 

We could alternatively say, putting on our LANGUAGE ARCHITECT’S HAT, that the LAST THING we need is a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME THAT GIVES A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO “MATERIAL BEING” since what we have been thinking of as “MATERIAL BEINGS” are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD such as “TOWNINGS IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.  By giving “BEING” PRIMARY STATUS as with ‘the TOWN’, we DEMOTE that which is PRIMARY; i.e. the WAVE-FIELD, to exactly NOTHING (absolute empty infinite space), while ELEVATING ‘APPEARANCES’ to PRIMARY REALITY STATUS. 

 

Thus, while we are SENSE-EXPERIENCING INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING, TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, which includes the SHRINKING WILDERNESS together with our growing selves and the growing MATERIAL ‘TOWN’ we say we are constructing, WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, thanks to our BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING CHOICE are DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and EMPLOYING A LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that is constrained to MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, hence we use language to report on ‘the TOWN GROWING’ FULL STOP (as if in an absolute empty and infinite space), as if that were ‘REALITY’.

 

LIKEWISE, NETANYAHU is reporting on ‘HAMAS ATTACKING’ FULL STOP, …as if that cherry-picked one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate linguistic conceptualization constituted ‘REALITY’.

LANGUAGE is DRIVING US NUTS!  Or, as Wittgenstein puts it;

 

Die Philosophie ist ein Kampf gegen die Verhexung  unsres Verstandes durch die Mittel unserer Sprache”

(Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of our language.)”

– Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations

 

WESTERN CULTURE POLITICIANS seem too preoccupied with their BINARY LOGIC game play to have time for philosophy.

 

END OF AUTHOR’S PREFACE:

 

(more…)

Where the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT WORLD (GLOBAL SOCIAL DYNAMIC) IS HEADED.

0

 

Bohm, Nietzsche and others have MADE THIS PREDICTION but VERY FEW IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE ARE PAYING ATTENTION because IN ORDER TO SEE where we are headed, we need to shift from BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING, and at the present time, OUR WESTERN CULTURE WAY OF CONCEIVING OF REALITY is BINARY LOGIC based which is TOO SIMPLE to convey the REAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE affirmed QUANTUM LOGIC dynamic that we share inclusion in.

 

WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS common construct LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of “REALITY” a PSEUDO-REALITY which is BINARY LOGIC based as where we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ …. WITHOUT MENTIONING THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS.

 

What this DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS …. DOES TO OUR PSYCHE, IS THAT IT HAS US THINKING AND UNDERSTANDING IN TERMS OF “REALITY” A PSEUDO-REALITY which is SIMPLER than the “REAL REALITY” of our “SENSE-EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION IN THE WAVE-FIELD” and it is SIMPLER in the respect that in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, we are DROPPING OUT all mention of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and “PRETENDING” that “REALITY” can be LINGUISTICALLY CONCEPTUALIZED in the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING TERMS of NAMING and GRAMMAR; e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’.

 

This kind of LINGUISTIC CONCETUALIZING, … SUBSTITUTES a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “INTELLECTUAL” “LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION” for the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC (transformation) of our actual SENSE-EXPERIENCE (of inclusion therein).

 

The WORLD OF OUR PHYSICAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE is very different from the WORLD OF OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS.  For example, we speak about the GROWTH of the TOWN or the growth of the HUMAN BEING as if GROWTH were something REAL in a SENSE-EXPERIENCE VERIFIABLE CONTEXT, but THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “GROWTH’ outside of BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, since EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX (as is the nature of the all-including energy-charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD).

 

THIS REAL-WORLD (sense-experience affirmed) FLOW aka TRANSFORMATION is ANDROGYNOUS meaning that IT IS NOT SUFFICIENT to PORTRAY REALITY in the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING terms of ‘the TOWN is GROWING.  This ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWING OF CULTIVATED LAND is IMPOSSIBLE in its own right and must be in conjugate relatiol with the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS.

(more…)

Go to Top