An inclusional worldview
ted lumley
to come
Posts by ted lumley
PREFACE NOTES on Martine’s Integral Adventure
0December 10, 2022
by ted lumley
in APN
PREFACE: I am adding a few follow-up “NOTES on Martine’s Integral Adventure as background to try to get around THE LIMITATIONS OF LANGUAGE, because in this case, the “STORY” is about the SHIFT from this general type of language I am right now using, which is a DIFFERENTIATION based language (as all the European language are) where we fragment things as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which “DIFFERENTIATES OUT” a notional “BEING-BASED THING-IN-ITSELF” called ‘THE TOWN”, … to an INTEGRATION based language that speaks in terms of “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, as is the architecture of Indigenous aboriginal languages, which gives a foundational role to INTEGRATIVE CONTEXT as in ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.
In the INTEGRATION based language architecture of the indigenous aboriginals, we LET GO OF THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT because this DIFFERENTIATION based FRAGMENTING approach to constructing REPRESENTATIONS of our sense-experience reality is TOO LIMITING and involves DROPOUT of information essential to the INTEGRATING of BOTH CONTENT (MALE-ASSERTING) and CONTAINER (FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING). For example, INTEGRATION captures the relations between the male asserting “TOWNING” which is conjoined with the female-accommodating “VALLEY”. This is the QUANTUM LOGIC view where, as stones are pulled from valley, DEEPENING the valley, the TOWN as a collective of STONE CONSTRUCTIONS is RISING UP, so that what is REALLY going on is the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE which is the ANDROGYNOUS union of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING deepening of the valley and the MALE ASSERTING growth of the TOWNING.
NOTA BENE: Languages such as English and the Common Average European family of languages (Whorf’s classification) employ DIFFERENTIATION to SELECT THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE; i.e. the “GROWING TOWN” and simply IGNORE the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING VALLEY HOLE produced by the extraction of materials, and this IGNORING or “IGNORANCE” sets up a SUBSTITUTE REALITY where GROWTH (and NOT “TRANSFORMATION”) is the language based pseudo-reality. This is just “our” WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE DESIGN, which appeals because of ITS GREATER SIMPLICITY thanks to the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE CONJUGATE of INTEGRATION (the common valley in which the towns are included) from our ANDROGYNOUS (INTEGRATING wave-trough-valley-DIFFERENTING wave-peak-town) co-comprising WAVE-FIELD REALITY, means that what our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is dealing with (only the MALE aspect) is NO LONGER CONSISTENT WITH OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY but is now the basis for a SIMPLIFIED, ONE-SIDED, MALE-ASSERTING ONLY ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ which nevertheless ‘WORKS’ for communications purposes since all of the users of this language are MAKING THE SAME MISTAKE in dropping out the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE
Since everyone is using the ‘short-cut’ involved in saying ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which drops out the reality that the building materials for the town are extracted from the VALLEY so that what is REALLY going on as affirmed by our SENSE-EXPERIENCE as opposed to our language-based abstract constructions, is TRANFORMATION.
My point about THIS ENGLISH LANGUAGE I AM USING is that in our customary (standard) use of this type of language, WE DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE to SIMPLIFY our task of constructing language based representations, and even though we are right now DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, which makes our language based representations VERY UN-REALISTIC, this still ‘works’ for the COMMUNICATING and SHARING of what is now a DUMBED DOWN MALE-ASSERTING ONLY (SUBSTITUTE-) REALITY REPRESENTATION where can speak of the ‘GROWTH OF THE TOWN’ without mentioning the conjugate SHRINKAGE of the VALLEY due to the extraction of materials employed in the construction of the TOWN (i.e. there is a material balance here which is ignored because we quietly assume we are lining in a FLAT SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT rather than in the space on surface of SPHERE). I am not suggesting that we do this CONSCIOUSLY, but I am suggesting that this is the implication of our DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and SPEAKING AS IF WE WERE LIVING IN A FLAT SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT where there is no FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE so that WE DO NOT HAVE TO ACCOUNT FOR THE REALITY THAT OUR EXTRACTION OF MATERIALS IS ACTUALLY TRANSFORMING THE SPHERICAL PLENUM (aka the WAVE-FIELD) WE ARE INCLUDED IN.
SUFFICE IT TO SAY that the language we are now using, i.e. this WESTERN CULTURE brand of language with its one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY reality-constructing architecture, is DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, the price we pay for putting our intellectually constructed SUBSTITUTE REALITY into the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY”. EXAMPLE, we now use language like ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, a one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY BINARY LOGIC PROPOSITION based on INTELLECTUAL DIFFERENTATION that separates the TOWNING from the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, … UNLIKE the indigenous aboriginal and Modern physics flow-based languages which fashion the equivalent of ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which retains the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and thus supports FULL ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING-MALE ASSERTING ‘WAVE-FIELD’ REALITY.
This longish PREFACE will be SOON FORGOTTEN as we continue reading because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are now PSYCHOLOGICALLY HABITUATED TO THE DROP OUT, IN LANGUAGE of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE which means that we are ‘used to’ working within the LANGUAGE-STIMULATED MENTAL IMAGERY that associates with a LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION based SUBSTITUTE REALITY where we believe that WE CAN SEE THE TOWN GROWING, even though this is NOT REAL but a language-stimulated abstraction obtained by DIFFERENTIATING OUT THE FIGURE FROM THE GROUND, the TOWNING from the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and setting it down, notionally, in an absolute empty and infinite space where we can INSPECT IT AS IF IT EXISTS A SEPARATE LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING based THING-IN-ITSELF, that we could extract from its innate inclusion in the transforming relational continuum, in the manner we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS can pick up a grasshopper, ignoring our and ‘its’ inclusion in the transforming relational continuum, and using DIFFERENTIATION as it we pull off its legs and wings to develop a mechanical understanding of that which, in reality, is like us, a CONDENSATION of the all-including transforming relational continuum aka WAVE-FIELD, understandable in terms of INTEGRATION, which is an understanding we BYPASS by employing DIFFERENTIATION, as we do with the grasshopper, first extracting the material form from its INTEGRATION within the overall ‘ecosystem’ or WAVE-FIELD, and then ‘getting to know it’ by breaking it down into a collection of material components as if it were a LOCAL, INDEPENDENT MACHINE, rather than a CONDENSATION of the ALL_INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.
WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is something we have ARCHITECTED on this abstract basis of BINARY LOGIC based DIFFERENTIATION, whereas INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE is consistent with Modern physics is acknowledging the need for an INTEGRATION based language which gives understanding in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms of CONDENSATIONS in the all-including WAVE-FIELD.
Now that we have discussed HOW SCREWED UP A DIFFERENTIATION BASED LANGUAGE IS, we can proceed with our DIFFERENTIATING LANGUAGE based ESSAY, because circumstances have put me and any potential readership, into this mode using a DUMBED-DOWN and PROBLEMATIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE for our communications.
One might ask me how I am, or if I am, going to avoid the booby-traps in this language I am using which DUMPS DOWN the communication to UNREALISTIC one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY constructions.
My answer is that this language IS CAPABLE of POINTING TO ITS OWN SHORTCOMINGS as in the sentence; ‘This language I am right now using has us saying stuff like ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING’ which is all one-sided MALE ASSERTING ACTION based when the task of using language to represent experiences from our sense-experience reality, needs be using language such as ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which incorporates both FEMALE ACCOMMODATING in conjugate relation with MALE ASSERTING as in the WAVE-FIELD nature of our sense-experience reality.
THERE, I WAS ABLE TO USE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO CONVEY THE LESS SIMPLE BUT MORE COMPLETE QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE-EXPERIENCE CONSISTENT REPRESENTATION OF ‘REALITY’ (I am keeping ‘reality’ in quotes because, as Korzybski might have said, “The linguistic representation is not the sense-experience reality).
SO, WHAT DOES THIS SAY ABOUT THE SHORTFALLS OF OUR ENGLISH LANGUAGE VIS A VIS CONSTRUCTING REPRESENTATIONS OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY?
If we reflect on it for a moment, we will see that the BIG WRENCH IN THE WORKS is our WESTERN CULTURE use, in our language based constructions of a go-by SUBSTITUTE REALITY, of the abstract concept of BEING that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ‘CREATE’ with ‘NAMING’. NAMING invents LOCAL INDEPENDENT “BEING” THINGS_IN-THEMSELVES that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS USE TO LINGUISTICALLY ‘FRAGMENT’ REALITY by ‘DIFFERENTIATING’ and thus ‘SEPARATING OUT’ relational forms in the transforming relational continuum
and from there, inventing our own constructions of reality on the abstract based of animating the NAMING INSTANTIATED BEING-THINGS that we have used language based DIFFERENTIATION to ‘NOTIONALLY SPLIT OUT’ of the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD, and USE THESE LINGUISTIC ABSTRACTION BASED “INDEPENDENT BEINGS”, re-animating them with GRAMMAR in LANGUAGE, to construct a BEING-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY REPRESENTATION.
SUCCESS! WE HAVE USED OUR FRAGMENTION BASED LANGUAGE; i.e. our DIFFERENTIATION BASED LANGUAGE, to CONSTRUCT GRAMMAR ANIMATED FRAGMENT BASED REPRESENTATIONS AS BEHAVIOUR GUIDING ‘GO-BYS’. The DOWNSIDE is that in the real world of our sense-experience, all material forms are CONDENSATIONS of an all-including WAVE-FIELD in which case COORDINATION of the apparent FRAGMENTS is assured because THEY ARE NOT, IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, ‘FRAGMENT’ but are instead ‘CONDENSATIONS’ of the all-including WAVE-FIELD aka the transforming relational continuum.
DANGER! Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, by its IMPUTING OF ‘BEING’ to relational forms in the flow, is creating a FRAGMENTED ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY” featuring notional INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BODIES in ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE (GOODBYE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD). THE CONNECTING SUBSTANCE OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD IS THUS REMOVES FROM OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE AND WE ARE LEFT WITH AN ASSORTMENT OF NAMING-INSTANTIATED ‘BEING’ BASED ABSTRACTIONS WHOSE MOVEMENTS AND INTERACTIONS “WE MUST INVENT” USING THE ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ COMBINATION OF ‘NAMING AND GRAMMAR’ SO AS TO CONSTRUCT A USABLE BINARY LOGIC (MATTER AND EMPTY SPACE BASED) SUBSTITUTE REALITY, FOR LINGUISTIC SHARING PURPOSES. Of course, what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have as our language based sharing capability, is a capability for sharing BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITIES, which we have built from DIFFERENTIATING OUT the relational forms in the transforming relational continuum.
So, let’s take another look at the SHORTFALL in our ENGLISH LANGUAGE. It seems as if THE SHORTFALL IS NOT INTRINSIC IN THE LANGUAGE PER SE, but is coming from how we use the language, as in our assigning a foundational role to words imputing BEING.
“Nothing indeed has exercised a more simple power of persuasion hitherto than the error of Being, as it was formulated by the Eleatics for instance: in its favour are every word and every sentence that we utter!—Even the opponents of the Eleatics succumbed to the seductive powers of their concept of Being. Among others there was Democritus in his discovery of the atom. “Reason” in language!—oh what a deceptive old witch it has been! I fear we shall never be rid of God, so long as we still believe in grammar.”
The problem, as Nietzsche points out is BEING-based REASONING. The introducing of BEING in language is intrinsically FRAGMENTING. It introduces BINARY LOGIC via the ABSTRACTIONS of MATTER and SPACE and over-rides the innate fluidity of the all-including WAVE-FIELD dynamic that is foundational in “NATURE ”
So the problem is not our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES PER SE, but HOW WE USE OUR LANGUAGE and more specifically, our problem is our use of language to REASON’ which gives a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE to the abstraction of BEING which sets up the BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION of “EITHER” is “OR” is not’ which is TOO SIMPLE to adequately capture the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND structure of the transforming relational continuum wherein MATERIAL FORMS CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD so that the CONDENSATIONS are BOTH THEMSELVES AND AT THE SAME TIME THE WAVE-FIELD THEY ARE INCLUDED IN.
It is clear that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE … DROPS OUT A LOT, … by its BUILT-IN BINARY LOGIC FOUNDATION using the abstract concept of BEING which lets us FRAGMENT REALITY in our LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION SCHEME, by equipping ourselves with what is really the tool of DIFFERENTIATION which lets us, notionally, EXTRACT from the transforming relational continuum, a dynamic that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as everything is in flux, a selection of FIGURES seen NOT AS WHORLS IN FLOW but at as LOCAL BEINGS thanks to the powers of LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION where we extract ‘the TOWN that is GROWING’ from our starting sense-experience impression that there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.
While there is some REDUNDANCY in these above words, the point that is intended is that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is based on DIFFERENTIATION which DROPS OUT the relational connections that are retained in an INTEGRATION based language architecture. DIFFERENTIATION brings with it the BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION of MATERIAL BEINGS, the ‘existence’ of which are determined by the simple “EITHER” is “OR” is not ‘reasoning’ test.
Once we have invented BEINGS by DIFFERENTIATING the relational continuum, and are using BEINGS in a foundational role in architecting our language based representation scheme, GRAMMAR is needed to construct a SYNTHETIC MATERIAL REALITY based on the actions and developments of the invented BEINGS. This DIFFERENTIATION based DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based construction of a LOCAL AUTHORING a based LINGUISTIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY, while it supports interpersonal communications, does so at the price of POPULARIZING synthetic SUBSTITUTE REALITIES that are FRAGMENTATION BASED. As Bohm points out, this is NOT ONLY serving up language-based FRAGMENTED VIEWS of the WORLD, it is FRAGMENTING our understanding of OURSELVES bringing on, as a WESTERN CULTURE INBUILT EXPOSURE, SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA.
BOTTOM LINE: We live in a world of pervasive INTEGRATION characteristic of the transforming relational continuum (WAVE-FIELD) while we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS put together language based SUBSTITUTE REALITY representations making it APPEAR as if we were living in a DIFFERENTIATED world of INDEPENDENT MATERIAL OBJECTS IN EMPTY SPACE.
Martine experienced what it is like to come to the understanding, through her ‘systems sciences’ investigations, of arriving at an understanding that cannot simply be shared as “A NEW PIECE OF UNDERSTANDING” that the recipient can ADD to their COLLECTION OF SUCH UNDERSTANDINGS, but in order to be able to assimilate this NEW UNDERSTANDING, must (A) construct a new and more comprehensive QUANTUM LOGIC CAPABLE STORAGE FACILITY, and (B) REVISE one’s ENTIRE EXISTING BINARY LOGIC based INVENTORY OF UNDERSTANDINGS to the new (QUANTUM LOGIC) STANDARD. As individuals, we CAN do this, but it involves giving up whatever STATUS we may have as LIVING EXPERTS in the DUMBED DOWN WORLD OF BINARY LOGIC-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, meaning, EXPERTS that enjoy WESTERN CULTURE recognition and rewarding for EXPERT STATUS, and as a result, our COLLECTIVE UNDERSTANDING progresses, as Max Planck suggested, “with the death of EXPERTS”.
WESTERN CULTURE EXPERTS are predominantly BINARY LOGIC ADEPT EXPERTS who have the ability to consistently come up with the BEST ANSWERS, … ALBEIT WITHIN THE NARROW CONTEXT of Goedel’s Theorem, of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite systems of BINARY LOGIC. The farmer who manages to cultivate more crops and produce more output than his peers is part of a system that REWARDS and RECOGNIZES on the basis of MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, … BUT THIS BINARY LOGIC ASSESSMENT is BLIND to the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING SHRINKAGE OF WILDERNESS and thus BLIND to the QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY of INCLUSION in an ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM AKA “WAVE-FIELD”. Our COLLECTIVE UNDERSTANDING in a QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE will thus progress with the death of BINARY LOGIC EXPERTS.
* * * end-of-preface * * *
Martine’s Integral Adventure
0December 8, 2022
by ted lumley
in APN
Preface: This essay highlights important but popularly-overlooked findings in regard to how different LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES can help to either CONVEY or CONCEAL relational understandings of a ‘systems science’ and Modern physics nature, with an upfront acknowledgement of the contribution of Martine Dodds-Taljaard. These understandings elucidate on the troubling dysfunctions of modern era social dynamics which arise from LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION and INTEGRATION, that impact psychological and physical ‘balance and well-being’ in a CULTURE-specific manner.
* * *
Introduction:
Martine Dodds-Taljaard (“June 20, 1947- 2001) is an exceptionally clear-thinking ‘systems thinker’ who was never confused by the WESTERN CULTURE penchant for that popular deviousness of ‘analytical thinking‘ that FRAGMENTS complexity born of global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence (characteristic of Wave-Field reality), as if ‘analysis’ were a pathway to understanding such complexity. But by chopping out a mechanistic skeleton of reality with the reductionist tool of pre-modern physics ‘analytical science’, we DISCARD, in the DIFFERENTIATING process, ‘the INTEGRATING baby as if it were the dirty bath water’, or in other words, we toss out the relational WAVE-FIELD magic of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “INTEGRATION” as if it were secondary to linguistically-imposed LOCAL AND EXPLICIT ‘DIFFERENTIATION; … as if the TOWNING in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT transforming landscape could be ANALYTICALLY extracted and reconceived of in terms of a LOCAL and EXPLICIT “BEING” based development.’ RE-INSTATING the INTEGRAL to its natural PRIMACY over the DIFFERENTIATED is an upstream battle in our WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC CRIPPLED mindsets.
“I am not surreptitious or devious – I am very straightforward, which is probably why I am often blackballed.” –Martine
However, being straightforward with those who are promoting a worldview in the abstract terms of DECLARATIONS of INDEPENDENCE and other intellectual abstraction based forms of FRAGMENTATION, ‘will not fly’ in the systems sciences mode of comprehension, an INTEGRATIVE mode of comprehension that is often reviled in our WESTERN CULTURE social collectives where the trend is to progressive fragmentation (eg. LGBTQ) sold on the basis of ‘suboptimization’, a modern-day WESTERN CULTURE ‘psychologically confused pursuit’ that Martine critiques citing systems science pioneer Kenneth Boulding, ‘the Name of the Devil if Suboptimization’.
The ERROR of A NAMING-based Declaration of Independence, backed up by a SECOND ERROR of GRAMMAR constitutes a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based IMPRESSION of LOCAL AUTHORING, critiqued by Nietzsche (Martine’s philosopher of choice) as the synthetic source of THE ERRONEOUS IMPRESSION OF LOCAL AUTHORING.
Declarations of Independence may achieve the desired popular intellectual conceptualizing without any support whatsoever from physical sense-experiencing, yet once the abstract notion of LOCAL BEING is established in the INTELLECT as a launching pad for GRAMMAR GIVING LOCAL AUTHORING, we have the building materials for constructing SUBSTITUTE REALITIES that let us choose an arbitrary starting location, thus FRAGMENTING the WAVE-FIELD CONTINUUM of our sense-experience.
While our sense-experience affirms our inclusion “in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence”, or in other words an INTEGRAL world, our language-stimulated intellect opens the door to BINARY LOGIC based DIFFERENTIATION or in other words ‘FRAGMENTATION’, by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR wherein, for example, the LOCAL TOWN EITHER EXISTS OR DOES NOT EXIST.
Once we choose the simple “DOES EXIST” option, this satisfies our BINARY LOGIC based linguistic reality constructing scheme, thus SHUTTING OUT and OBSCURING the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC understanding option wherein THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.
THIS SHUTTING OUT of the QUANTUM LOGIC option amounts to OBSCURANTISM, where we GO FORWARD with our language construction based on the over-simplistic (and fragmentary) BINARY LOGIC based impression of the LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING of ‘the TOWN’. The point is that once BINARY LOGIC based language gets first dibs on REPRESENTATION, the BEING-based status of ‘the TOWN’ is CONCRETIZED, SHUTTING OUT the very possibility of the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding option that is in terms of TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which acknowledges our living “in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence”.
The BEING-based status of ‘the TOWN’, on the other hand, sets up the FRAGMENTATION-SUPPORTING linguistic abstraction of LOCAL BEING-based AUTHORING as in; ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, and PRODUCING goods. This linguistic DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR construction supports a PSYCHOLOGICALLY MISTAKEN IMPRESSION of the possibility of LOCAL-BEING based SUB-OPTIMIZATION’.
“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionist scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard (International Society of Systems Sciences)
The following essay is congruent with the work of my friend, Martine, whose pioneering systems sciences work, although it currently remains an ‘outlier’ in a world obsessed with language-based fragmentation, is sorely needed to resolve the problematic persistence of intellectual-abstraction based fragmentation in WESTERN CULTURE thinking and social relating.
* * * * * * * * * *
THE BIG LIE: The Linguistic Fabrication of BEING
0December 4, 2022
by ted lumley
in APN
The BIG LIE is a phenomenon which has been exploited by politicians. It is written about by Hitler in Mein Kampf. If the lie is small, the man on the street will call us out on it. But when the lie is huge, and coming with the backing of ‘authorities’, as we have seen recently with Donald Trump and the BIG LIE that ‘the election was fraudulent’ and that ‘Trump was really the winner’, many people will believe ‘the big lie’.
There are BIG LIES that divide the world, and the one that has caught my attention is the BIG LIE OF “BEING” of the WESTERN CULTURE that I have grown up in. How can BEING co-exist with a fluid world?
“In the writing of Heraclitus, to a larger degree than ever before, the images do not impose their burden of concreteness but are entirely subservient to the achievement of clarity and precision”
“Heraclitus had declared ‘being’ a perpetual ‘becoming’ and had correlated the two concepts with his ‘hidden attunement.’ Now Parmenides declared the two to be mutually exclusive, and only ‘being’ to be real.” — ‘The Intellectual Adventure of Ancient Man’, — ‘Henri Frankfort, H. A. Frankfort, John A. Wilson, Thorkild Jacobsen, and William A. Irwin.
The SOURCE of the BEING based world is DIFFERENTIATION as in the BINARY LOGIC SPLIT between the MATERIAL PARTICLE and EMPTY SPACE, and from THIS MOST ELEMENTAL BEING, a language architecture follows which is based on DIFFERENTIATION out the LOCAL and EXPLICIT where, in the end, everything can be understood in the context similar to that of the Russian doll, the Matryoshka, where the larger forms are built up from smaller forms so that in order to understand what might be termed the MACRO-REALITY, we can break it down into a parts-wise MICRO-REALITY. This BEING based worldview is a BINARY LOGIC worldview based on MALE ASSERTING ACTION of MATERIAL BEING-based STRUCTURES MOVING AND INTERACTING in EMPTY SPACE..
By contrast, the SOURCE of the BECOMING-based world is INTEGRATION rather than DIFFERENTIATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) as in the formation of clouds which are ACCUMULATIONS arising from the INTEGRATION of CONDENSATIONS of the energy-charged PLENUM they are included in. This INTEGRATION-BASED SHAPE-SHIFTING COMPRISED BY FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ACTION gives rise to FORMINGS WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING PLENUM. These FORMINGS within the TRANSFORMING as relate with QUANTUM LOGIC (the BOTH/AND logic of the including medium.
NOTA BENE! The language-based world of INTEGRATION where local forms are INCLUSIONS in the all-including energy-charge PLENUM so that ALL ARE RELATED, may be ambiguously captured in language by REDUCING their QUANTUM LOGIC FIGURE-INCLUDED-IN-GROUND relation with LANGUAGE that Re-presents them as “FORMS” within an EMPTY CONTAINING SPACE, creating a language-based SIMLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, a SUBSTITUTE REALITY that can be extended and adapted and maintained on the basis of the BINARY LOGIC architecture of MUTUALLY EXCLUDING material objects and empty space.
Linguistic OBSCURANTISM in Western Culture Language Architecture
0November 30, 2022
by ted lumley
in APN
AUTHOR’S SUMMARY of; LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM in Western Culture Language Architecture
We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have ‘engineered’ the Common Average European language architecture to BREAK DOWN and SIMPLIFY our language capture of WAVE-FIELD REALITY by BREAKING OUT the MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE ON ITS OWN, and at the same time simply DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE so as to construct a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on ONE-SIDED, BINARY LOGIC based MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, as for example ‘the TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’ which implies BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR SPLITTING of the TOWN out of the LANDSCAPE and implying only MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS without any FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.
While this one-sided MALE ASSERTING is all that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are putting into our language based representations, our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is of inclusion in the ANDROGYNOUS (FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING — MALE-ASSERTING) WAVE-FIELD, setting up a CONFLICT between our LANGUAGE-INFORMED INTELLECT and our SENSE-EXPERIENCE INFORMED AWARENESS, and this is the source of rising FRAGMENTATION within our psyche and in our actions as WESTERN CULTURE ADHERING individuals and social collectives.
This LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE is “NOT” SUFFERED by indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents. These groups have acknowledged the natural fit of QUANTUM LOGIC with sense-experience reality and the over-simplicity of BINARY LOGIC. QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the including medium which captures the physical relational structure of reality wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED WAVE-FIELD PLENUM. WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is OBSCURANTIST in that it employs a language architecture that “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE of the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD. Since the FEMALE CONJUGATE is the INTEGRATING CONTAINER for MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, this OBSCURANTISM is leading to increasing FRAGMENTATION in BOTH the PSYCHE and SOCIAL DYNAMICS of WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS (as noted by Bohm).
This short essay describes the basics of this WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM wherein the all-including QUANTUM LOGIC (wherein material forms are condensations of the ) WAVE-FIELD FLOW is OBSCURED by LANGUAGE based SUBSTITUTION of notional INDEPENDENT MATERIAL FRAGMENTS notionally with ‘their own’ GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS and INTERACTIONS, as if situated within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE. This BINARY LOGIC OBSCURANTIST SUBSTITUTE REALITY is now our WESTERN CULTURE OPERATIVE REALITY which is leading to rising FRAGMENTATION in both WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHOLOGICAL and PHYSICAL REALMS.
* * *
LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM is a WESTERN CULTURE DYSFUNCTION coming from ERRORS in our “Common Average European” Language Architectures. The Nietzsche-labelled ‘DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’ which sets up a notional LOCAL AUTHOR’ gives us the sense of a one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY world dynamic.
The WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE of WAVE-FIELD REALITY, can be seen, for example, where we reduce the QUANTUM LOGIC “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, where TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is given as the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING receptacle for the MALE ASSERTING TOWNING, … to the BINARY LOGIC ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products which has DROPPED OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING LANDSCAPE and reduces the impression of the transforming landscape to the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING REPRESENTATION OF THE TOWN THAT IS GROWING, … as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE’.
This DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR construction is LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM and it is BUILT IN to WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and thus it is built in to our common :LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION, or better, “LINGUISTIC MIS-REPRESENTATION” of REALITY. To be clear, it is IMPOSSIBLE, in the spherical space of our sense-experience, for a TOWN to “GROW” without a SIMULTANEOUS SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS that the GROWING TOWN is ‘pushing into’. This CONJUGATE RELATION of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING with MALE ASSERTING is basic to the WAVE-FIELD world of our sense-experience and there are problems where we reduce this ANDROGYNOUS reality to a one-sided MALE-ASSERTING substitute reality..
Meanwhile, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is ‘infected’ by LINGUISTIC OBSCURATISM wherein there is a DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE so that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS end up constructing a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is ONE-SIDEDLY MALE-ASSERTING, as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE (Euclidean) SPACE.
Language is Delivering IMPRESSIONS and NOT REPRESENTATIONS of REALITY
0November 26, 2022
by ted lumley
in APN
LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION supports Purification which is BINARY (either/or) LOGIC based (e.g. the TOWN is GROWING), which is one-sided MALE ASSERTING as if in EMPTY SPACE.
LINGUISTIC INTEGRATION gives rise to Coherence which is QUANTUM (both/and) LOGIC based (e.g. there is TOWNING in the transforming landscape) which is …”BOTH” … FEMALE ACCOMMODATING (with respect to “an OPENING in the transforming landscape” that accommodates a filling in with TOWNING) … “AND” MALE ASSERTING (with respect to “the TOWNING”).
The understanding here is, instead of one’s language IMPOSING an INTELLECTUAL REPRESENTATION of REALITY, our language is instead CAPTURING a sensory IMPRESSION of REALITY so there is no need to DEBATE and use BINARY LOGIC to determine WHO HAS THE BEST IMPRESSION as with WHO HAS THE BEST REPRESENTATION, but to instead gather the IMPRESSIONS together in the LEARNING CIRCLE to use INTEGRATION to extract the coherencies from the confluence of relations of multiple IMPRESSIONS.
The point is that IMPRESSION is first of all about the psycho-sensual receptivity of the OBSERVER and how the OBSERVER is inductively influenced by his/her OBSERVING while REPRESENTATION is the OBSERVER’S INTELLECTUAL IMPOSING of ‘BEING’ based structure’. The “INTELLECTUAL IMPOSING of MATERIAL EVIDENCE” is exposed to DROP OUT as in the ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ where REPRESENTATION is limited to MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS as if occurring in an EMPTY SPACE. But in WAVE-FIELD reality, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate is important so that the COLLAPSING of the EGG-SHELL SKULL cannot be fully and solely attributed to MALE ASSERTING ACTION. Likewise, the farmer’s bumper crop cannot be fully and solely attributed to the farmer’s MALE ASSERTING ACTION simply because WESTERN CULTURE DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE (e.g. accommodating soil and weather) in its LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATION.
The sense IMPRESSION, because it includes the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, while it is LESS SIMPLE than the MALE ASSERTING ACTION CONJUGATE on its own, is MORE COMPLETE and exposes the INCOMPLETENESS of ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATIONS of REALITY, an INCOMPLETENESS that we are WARNED ABOUT by Goedel’s Theorem (of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite logical propositions).
* * *
We have all heard of Heraclitus’ “EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX” and Modern Physics’ POPULAR FORMULATION supports this with its CONCEPTUALIZING of an ALL-INCUDING WAVE-FIELD, … but WAIT A MINUTE, … this notion that MATERIAL THINGS are CONSTANTLY TRANSFORMING and that we can use PROBABILITY to capture their transitioning from MATTER to ENERGY … WAS CONTESTED by Schroedinger and others on THE FOLLOWING BASIS;
WHICH IS IT? “FLUX IS EVERYTHING” or “EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX”?
Once we OPEN THE DOOR to EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, as the mainstream of MODERN PHYSICS has done (although NOT Schroedinger, Bohm and others in the PHILOSOPHICAL camp such as Wittgenstein and Nietzsche), we are giving a FOUNDATION ROLE to MATERIAL BEING and saying that there is such a thing as MATERIAL BEING but such MATERIAL BEINGS (particles or whatever) ARE IN CONSTANT FLUX. This is one of those self-contradictory propositions like ‘the PRARODOX OF THE ARROW’ of ZENO’ which shows the IMPOSSIBILITY of this simultaneous duality of stillness of LOCAL EXPLICIT BEING and FLUID MOVEMENT.
It MAKES MORE SENSE to go with ‘FLUX IS EVERYTHING’ than to go with ‘EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX’.
In other words, we need to accept that MATERIAL THINGS are ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ as Schroedinger consistently maintained to the day of his departure, in which case we have to DROP the ‘THINGS’ in ‘EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX’ and go with ‘FLUX IS EVERYTHING’.
What I am saying is that the WAVE-FIELD is PRIMARY and we have to let go of WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY. In other words, it is NOT in the REALM of PHYSICS that we can tie down this WAVE-MATTER DUALITY but in the REALM of LANGUAGE since FLUX IS EVERYTHING and there is no room for CONFUSED THINKING in terms that EVERY”THING” IS IN FLUX. The “THING” ABSTRACTION HAS TO GO as in “FLUX IS EVERYTHING” so that our understanding can be “grounded” in WAVE-FIELD FLUIDITY wherein MATERIAL THINGS are APPEARANCES (schaumkommen).
* * *
WESTERN CULTURE’s Unnatural Inverting of INTEGRATION and DIFFERENTIATION
0November 17, 2022
by ted lumley
in APN
There is dysfunction built into WESTERN CULTURE social dynamics, which David Bohm describes as FRAGMENTATION. But where does this FRAGMENTATION ‘come from’?
A ‘first order’ answer to this question is that FRAGMENTATION comes from LANGUAGE, from our DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE so that our LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATIONS of Reality are in ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING TERMS while the FEMALE CONJUGATE, which is naturally deserving of PRIMARY STATUS, is “DROPPED OUT” by way of the SUBSTITUTING of ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE.
So, instead of WAVE-FIELD conjugate relation wherein FEMALE ACCOMMODATING induces conjugate MALE ASSERTING, we have, IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATIONS of ‘REALITY’, the ONE-SIDED, MECHANISTIC MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS ON THEIR OWN. This one-sided MALE ASSERTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY is the COMMON LANGUAGE-based ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’ in WESTERN CULTURE.
EXAMPLE: Where we have the CONIUNCTIO of FEMALE-ACOMMODATING and MALE-ASSERTING as in where ‘THERE IS TOWNING (male-asserting) IN THE (female-accommodating) TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ , our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC SIMPLIFICATION SERVES UP THE FOLLOWING ‘REDUCTION’ … The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products”.
This kind of language embodies DIFFERENTIATION, as it ‘differentiates out’ the ‘TOWN’, using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development (i.e. ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services’.
This DIFFERENTIATION based (BINARY LOGIC based) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is very familiar to ENGLISH LANGUAGE users and Common Average European language users, but the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL language users, and the Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta language users employ INTEGRATION based (QUANTUM LOGIC based) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE as exemplified by ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (or transforming relational continuum)’. In this case, we understand TOWNING as an INTEGRAL FEATURE WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE WHEREIN EVERYTHING IS IN CONTINUING FLUX.
NOTA BENE! There is a NATURAL PRECEDENCE in the use of INTEGRATION based language and DIFFERENTIATION based language in the PSYCHOLOGY of THOUGHT AND LANGUAGE as explained by Vygotsky in “THOUGHT and LANGUAGE”;. That is, as we take everything in that is going on around us in the particular situation we find ourselves in, our outside-inward thinking is in INTEGRATING mode, bringing everything into connective confluence to extract the coherencies, … but in our RESPONDING to our situation, our thinking is now DIFFERENTIATING as we develop different courses of action and make our selection.
In ‘Thought and Language’, Lev Vygotsky points out that ‘spontaneous concept formation’ induced by the situation we find ourselves in, and ‘scientific concept formation’ which we can think of as our corresponding intention driven response that is inductively actualized by the unfolding situation, are a single system; i.e. a situational-intentional nonduality. We might compare this with a Dionysian-Apollonian nonduality
PROBLEM!: PIAGET has had a strong influence on WESTERN CULTURE views on thought and learning which relate to the DIFFERENCE between the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL and WESTERN CULTURE understanding, where the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL comprehension puts INTEGRATION into natural precedence over DIFFERENTIATION whereas PIAGET (and we can look to his views as characterizing the prevailing WESTERN CULTURE views), ignores the NATURAL CONJUGATE RELATION between THOUGHT and LANGUAGE.
UNDERSTANDING How DIFFERENTIATION and INTEGRATION figure in WESTERN CULTURE “FRAGMENTATION”
0November 12, 2022
by ted lumley
in APN
POSTSCRIPT TO: UNDERSTANDING How DIFFERENTIATION and INTEGRATION figure in WESTERN CULTURE “FRAGMENTATION”
IF WE START FROM THE LAST NOTE, … THE KEY PREMISE CAN BE FOUND IN THE DISCUSSION OF THE ‘THIN SKULL RULE’. EVEN THOUGH WE KNOW FULL WELL THAT THE MALE ASSERTING PUNCH IS INSUFFICIENT TO EXPLAIN THE COLLAPSING OF THE THIN SKULL, … since this ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ACTION IS INNATELY TOO SIMPLE and IN BASIC CONTRADICTION TO THE WAVE-FIELD understanding of reality THE FEMALE_ACCOMMODATING—MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE understanding aka the Yin/Yang understanding, … which is embraced not only by INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS BUT ALSO AFFIRMED BY MODERN PHYSICS.
I AM SIMPLY AFFIRMING, and HAVE SAID NOTHING HERE TO CONTRADICT, .. THE GREAT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ON THIS TOPIC AS AFFIRMED BY BUDDHISTS AND BY BOHM and NIETZSCHE and SCHROEDINGER and WITTGENSTEIN AND OTHERS, …
SO THE SCRUTINIZING OF THIS NOTE NEED NOT GO BACK TO REVIEWING THOSE QUANTUM LOGIC UNDERSTANDINGS, the SCRUTINY NEEDS TO GO TO WHY WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS CONTINUE TO EMPLOY BINARY LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE TO CONSTRUCT REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY WHEN WE KNOW THAT OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE REALITY CONFORMS WITH QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE.
WHY? THE ANSWER IS CLEAR. IN SYSTEMS TERMS, “WE ARE LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS”. DO WE WANT TO FACE UP TO THE “COST” IN “SOCIAL RE-ADJUSTMENT TERMS” IN OUR BINARY LOGIC INFUSED SOCIAL RELATIONAL COMMON PRACTICES, OF “UPGRADING” FROM “BINARY LOGIC” TO “QUANTUM LOGIC” AS IS CALLED FOR IN THE “UPGRADE” FROM “NEWTONIAN BINARY LOGIC BASED REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY WHICH ARE OF A MECHANISTIC (ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY ) “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”?
ANSWER: The SWITCHING COSTS ARE HUGE AND INCLUDE;
-1- REVAMPING THE WESTERN JUSTICE SYSTEM. MODERN PHYSICS CONFIRMS THAT THE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM ‘MAKES SENSE’ IN THAT IT IS BASED ON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT WE LIVE IN A RELATIONAL WORLD WHEREIN THERE IS NO SUCH THING, … AS THERE IS ASSUMED TO BE IN WESTERN JUSTICE, … AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” as is supported in WESTERN CULTURE GENERALLY and which is ABSTRACTION coming from the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE; i.e. from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which IMPUTES “LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments” and which is used to construct a LOCAL AUTHORING BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, while all the while, our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is informing us we share inclusion in a transforming relational continuum (aka the WAVE-FIELD) wherein the dynamics are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational). IN OTHER WORDS, “LOCAL AUTHORING” IS A SCAM! IT IS THE PRODUCT OF THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR.
This PARTICULAR ERROR, ‘the DOUBLE ERROR’, RADICALLY REVISES WESTERN CULTURE CONCEPTS OF JUSTICE, MEDICINE and COMMERCE, and thus the FOUNDATIONAL STRUCTURE OF WESTERN CULTURE ADMINISTRATION SYSTEMS, all of which are HEAVILY SHAPED by the influence of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which IMPUTES “LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments”
The Western Culture SLEEPWALKER CONFEDERACY
0November 5, 2022
by ted lumley
in APN
Why refer to WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS as a SLEEPWALKER CONFEDERACY?
The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is a language architecture designed to put the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE TO SLEEP, leaving only the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE ‘AWAKE’.
It is a SLEEPWALKER CONFEDERACY in the sense that millions of people have adopted a common language architecture wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE has been “PUT TO SLEEP” so that only the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE IS ‘AWAKE’.
This has been achieved with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is used to invent the ABSTRACT NOTION of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’.
In this BINARY LOGIC based Mode of REPRESENTATION wherein the FIRST ERROR is the NAMING that imputes BEING and the SECOND ERROR is the GRAMMAR that conflates the FIRST ERROR by bestowing LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS on the NAMING-instantiated BEING.
As we know from Modern physics and as has been the understanding of Indigenous Aboriginal cultures Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedant, we are included in an ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD REALITY and WAVE-FIELDS are constituted by FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE RELATIONS as where the ACCOMMODATING OPENING or SHRINKING of the VALLEY LANDSCAPE and the CONJUGATE ASSERTING ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENTS and PRODUCTION together are the agents of TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE.
In the SPHERICAL SPACE we live in, as with waves in the ocean, when a hole or depression opens up this ‘valley’ is balanced out the rising of a hill or mountain. THESE MOVEMENTS ONLY APPEAR TO BE TWO POLAR OPPOSITE ACTION, but in the land on the surface of a sphere, there can be NO subducting and opening of a hole or valley without a conjugate uplifting and protruding of a mound or mountain since this motion is relative.
A BRIEF PERSONAL COMMENT on … THE FALL FROM GRACE: in the light of QUANTUM LOGIC versus BINARY LOGIC
0November 4, 2022
by ted lumley
in APN
HERE IS A BRIEF PERSONAL COMMENT ON MY CONTINUING RESEARCH:
What I am trying to share is something I normally try to back up with analysis and this increases the number of words I use.
Here’s the basic problem that make my messages lengthy. The problem that is screwing up our social dynamic is coming from our Common Average European language architecture so in order to share this, I have to (a) invent a more competent language, and (b) bring the people I am trying to share ideas with up to speed in the new, LESS SIMPLE language.
That is what my posts are all about, which makes them long and perhaps appearing as NOT TO THE POINT, and that is relevant because the needed shift for communications that attempt the bridge between the popular BINARY LOGIC based language constructions which we commonly use and the QUANTUM LOGIC based language constructions which the indigenous aboriginals commonly use and which are needed for Modern physics competent exchanges, is a shift out of any/all dependency on BEING-based or BINARY LOGIC based concepts, to communications that are purely relationally based. This can be illustrated with examples which compare the BINARY LOGIC representation ‘the Town is growing’… with the QUANTUM LOGIC representation ‘There is Towning in the transforming landscape’.
We can see that in the expression ‘there is Towning in the transforming landscape’, everything is relational (nonlocal and implicit) and there is nothing in the statement that is LOCAL and EXPLICIT because the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, is like the WHORLING in the FLOWING wherein FIGURE and GROUND are one. That is the very definition of QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING MEDIUM; i.e. the MEDIUM AS A FLUID CONTAINER in which the CONTENTS are made of the CONTAINER as with whorling in the flowing. That is what QUANTUM LOGIC is all about and QUANTUM LOGIC comes from Modern physics’ capture of the structure of the world; i.e. we live in a world where we can distinguish between MATERIAL forms (which are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD) and the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD (the PLENUM); i.e. the WAVE-FIELD with its locally pinched up CONDENSATIONS aka MATERIAL FORMS and these CONDENSATIONS are like WHORLINGS IN THE FLOWING; i.e. the WHORLING FIGURE and FLOWING GROUND are ONE.
Western Culture Linguistic Obscurantism: Wave-Field Denial
0November 3, 2022
by ted lumley
in APN
We live in a WAVE-FIELD world wherein we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have devised a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that DUMBS DOWN our REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY to ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS. This IS A SIMPLIFIED “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” that supports coordinating the actions of its user base, by way of their common orienting to the SUBSTITUTE REALITY. It is possible to coordinate actions on the basis of the TOWN that one is CONSTRUCTING (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS) or on the basis of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE that one is included in (INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS). Note that the FORMER COORDINATION APPROACH rides roughshod over the LATTER COORDINATION APPROACH.
A FURTHER ISSUE is that this WESTERN CULTURE SIMPLIFIED, LANGUAGE BASED SUBSITITUTE REALITY REPRESENTATION “OBSCURES” rather than simply OMITS the LESS-SIMPLE aspects of our sense-experience reality, such as the QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD so that FIGURE (CONDENSATION) and GROUND (WAVE-FIELD) “ARE ONE”, rather than “TWO” as in our “STANDARD” WESTERN CULTURE SUBSTITUTE REALITY REPRESENTATION. SO, every time we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR construct with its LOCAL AUTHOR CONNOTATION, we are WRONG and furthermore, we are in the process FRAGMENTING REALITY by creating more LOCAL AUTHOR FRAGMENTS, who are in our REPRESENTATION SCHEME “NOT RELATED” because they are insulated from one another by the ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE we are notionally putting them into and giving them a BINARY LOGIC based INDEPENDENT EXISTENCE STATUS (EITHER I exist OR I don’t exist) which is too simple to support our QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of an ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD in which MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS.
The WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM is put into play with BINARY LOGIC which is TOO SIMPLE to deal with QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC there the MATERIAL FIGURE is a CONDENSATION of the ALL-INCLUDING (WAVE-FIELD) GROUND. What we are seeing with the movement of figures is actually the TRANSFORMATION of the WAVE-FIELD, pointing to the relevancy of QUANTUM LOGIC discourse wherein the FIGURE is a CONDENSATION OF THE WAVE-FIELD GROUND.
The insistence on a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE supporting the EXISTENCE of INDEPENDENT MATERIAL FORMS (such as we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS claim for ourselves) signals widespread deception by way of LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM that supports WAVE-FIELD DENIAL. This is RAMPANT in WESTERN CULTURE wherein we have elevated the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGUATE of the WAVE-FIELD INTO THE LEAD POSITION NATURALLY OCCUPIED BY THE UNDIVIDED WAVE-FIELD.
The RESULT IS WAVE-FIELD DENIAL, secured by LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM in which we PROMOTE A SUBSTITUTE REALITY OF MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT ENSCONCED IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.
* * * * * *
We live in a WAVE-FIELD WORLD that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is OBSCURING.
The SUBSTITUTING OF BINARY LOGIC FOR QUANTUM LOGIC IS THE METHOD BY WHICH OBSCURTISM IS SECURED.
The Thin-Skull Rule is just one example that exposes a general pattern of OBSCURANTISM wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE is DROPPED OUT of WESTERN CULTURE language based representation.
The Thin Skull Rule reduces the reality of our inclusion in an all-including WAVE-FIELD dynamic by SUBSTITUTING the abstract notion of an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the all-including WAVE-FIELD. This DROP-OUT is LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM that FALSELY elevates the MALE-ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE to an overall SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTING STATUS. When we say that ‘the FORCE OF THE PUNCH SHATTERED THE RECIPIENT’S SKULL, we make no mention of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, the innate presence of which is basic to the REALITY of our inclusion in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, as is captured in indigenous aboriginal languages and as is acknowledged in Modern physics.
Most Recent Comments