OVERVIEW:

The world we live in; i.e. the world of our sense-experience of inclusion in a transforming relational continuum, is knowable only by inference since we cannot ‘get outside of it’ to capture an understanding of it as an independently existing world.  This means that what we SEE OUT THERE as LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES as we speak of in such terms at THE TOWN that is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products is only a SUBSTITUTE REALITY or SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE for the INEFFABLE WAVE-FIELD REALITY WE AND EVERYTHING IS INCLUDED IN.  Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE FRAGMENTS the transforming relational continuum of our sense-experience of inclusion therein, reducing and simplifying the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE to LOCAL, EXPLICIT FRAGMENTS such as ‘the TOWN’ which we give a life of its own to with GRAMMAR as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products, as if we are an external observer enjoying a voyeur view on which we can overlay a MEASURING GRID of the WORLD we are observing AS IF FROM THE OUTSIDE.  If we can see it from the outside, it is not the reality we are included in, but is instead a SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which WE ARE MISSING.  We must there be careful with our use of language based representations because if they are voyeur views, they are not view of REALITY since REALITY is something we are included in.

In this context, we may remind ourselves of Nietzsche’s point about the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR whereby we establish a language based description of a NAMING-instantiated notional LOCAL THING IN ITSELF (a BEING) such as ‘the TOWN’ and we conflate this with the second error of GRAMMAR to impute LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT to the FIRST ERROR of the NAMING-INSTANTIATING of a notional THING-IN-ITSELF.

This language-based REPESENTATION is NOT of REALITY but of a LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY where the THING in our FOCAL POINT, we are using GRAMMAR to equip with POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.

NOTA BENE:  THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” (i.e. as in ‘the TOWN that does its own GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING) in our real-life sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao.  The LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta DOES NOT EMPLOY THE ABSTRACT NOTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING IN THEIR LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS.  E.g. their languages fashion representations in terms of “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX as in TRANSFORMATION as Heraclitus maintained was the actual sense-experience affirmed REALITY and in a reality wherein everything is in flux, there are no LOCAL AUTHORS of ANYTHING.

While it is CORRECT to say, in keeping with the all-including transforming WAVE-FIELD, that ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, it is INCORRECT to say ‘the TOWN is GROWING, or DEVELOPING or PRODUCING something’… which imputes the POWER OF LOCAL AUTHORING to the TOWN as within the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR language structure.  This is INCORRECT and it brings forth REPRESENTATIONS that purport to be REPRESENTATONS OF REALITY when they are actually REPRESENTATIONS of an ABSTRACT SUBSTITUTE REALITY, the SUBSTITUTE REALITY OF A BINARY LOGIC based LOCAL TOWN THAT IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING THINGS, as if it were INDEPENDENT of the SPACE it is included in.  And by our language based construction of such SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE, we SHUT OUT FROM  OUR MENTAL ACCESS, the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY of TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT REMAIN UNDER THE PSYCHOLOGICAL INFLUENCE OF OUR BINARY LOGIC based SUBTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS that, as Bohm is saying, is the source of SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA as in the COVID 19 PATHOGEN ATTACK (there are no PATHOGENS in QUANTUM REALITY, only IMBALANCES).  PATHOGENS are BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION that DO NOT EXIST in our relational world where there is relational BALANCE and IMBALANCE but NO LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORING AGENTS and thus no LOCAL, EXPLICIT GOOD and EVIL AUTHORING AGENTS.  We can be CHANNELS or LIGHTNING RODS through which RELATIONAL DISSONANCE can ‘surface’ but THERE ARE NO LOCAL AUTHORS of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, GOOD, BAD or INDIFFERENT.  WE ALL SHARE INCLUSION IN A WAVE-FIELD world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …”  The FRAGMENTED SUBSTITUTE REALITY COMMISSIONED BY LINGUISTIC DOUBLE ERRORS OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR IS, as SCHROEDINGER OFFERS, ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ (APPEARANCES).

* * * 

We might ask ourselves, Why do we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS choose to THINK and SPEAK in terms of CONTINENTAL DRIFT (where the continents are understood as LOCAL and EXPLICIT MALE ASSERTING objects) .. rather than SEAFLOOR SPREADING (where the ocean basins are understood as NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ACCOMMODATING holes).

We find, if we reflect on this, that SEAFLOOR SPREADING implies CIRCULATION since if we focus on the SPREADING, there must be new material being extruded from the interior of the Earth sphere to fill in behind the spreading which involves older material subducting.  Because the surface area of the sphere of the Earth remains the same size, there must be a SUBDUCTION ZONE here older material on the surface SINKS INTO THE BODY of the Earth to ‘make way’ for the OUTWELLING extrusion of material that adds material on top of the pre-existing surface.   What we are comparing here in CONTINENTAL DRIFT (which concerns “LOCAL, EXPLICIT” CONTINENTS) vis a vis SEAFLOOR SPREADING which is comprised of EXTRUSION and SUBDUCTION are understandings with DIFFERING DIMENSIONALITY since the CONTINENTAL DRIFT is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and SUPERFICIAL while SEAFLOOR SPREADING IS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and TRANSFORMATIVE (everything is in flux, as was the observation of Heraclitus and as is supported by Modern physics with its WAVE-FIELD understanding of reality wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD).

HOW DOES LANGUAGE DEAL WITH THESE DIFFERENT UNDERSTANDINGS?

ANSWER:  “DIFFERENTLY” (i.e. different language architectures have been developed which different groups of people have embraced which deliver differing views of ‘reality’.  The power of different languages to put us (psychologically) into different “realities” is the finding of Benjamin Whorf, and it has been controversial because many of us prefer to understand that there is only ONE reality and it is the reality that our social group ‘lives in’.  Thus for the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT the very different reality understood by indigenous aboriginals can be ignored because, “as everyone knows” (so say the WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS), we are all INDEPENDENT HUMAN BEINGS who live on a spherical planet which moves about within a collection of planets, stars and material bodies within a vast and ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT.

(more…)

PREAMBLE: The language-and-grammar-built notion of MALE-ASSERTING actions and developments transpiring within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE is playing a foundational role in WESTERN CULTURE conceptualizing of ‘reality’.  This abstract BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY is being used within our WESTERN CULTURE language scheme to coordinate actions and understandings; i.e. this BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY is being used as our WESTERN CULTURE OPERATIVE REALITY.   This “SIMPLISTIC” BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY now serves as our WESTERN CULTURE OPERATIVE REALITY which differs substantially from the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC based reality of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta comprehends TOWNING and TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE  AS ONE (where the MATERIAL INHABITANT FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD HABITAT).  

The SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC understanding is of a SUBSTITUTE REALITY where TOWN and COUNTRYSIDE are psycho-LOGICALLY (using BINARY LOGIC) divided into TWO SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT ONTOLOGICAL REALMS; the separate realms of  (a) A LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THING-IN-ITSELF, and (b), AN IMPLIED EMPTY and INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.  The latter over-simplistic BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY has been and continues to be used as the WESTERN CULTURE “standard operative reality”, the consequence of which is rising dysfunction due to the GAP between the intellectual abstraction of the BINARY “EITHER/OR” LOGIC based substitute reality and the SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the QUANTUM “BOTH/AND” LOGIC (where the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD are BOTH distinct relational forms in the flow AND are the flow, … as with the QUANTUM LOGIC whorl and flow relation in fluid turbulence.)

* * *

My philosophical investigations into how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS seem to be screwing up have steadily converged on the following understanding; i.e. that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE USAGE is BINARY LOGIC based which is THE SCREW UP.  Modern physics gives us a QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of reality.  QUANTUM LOGIC is basically about BALANCE and IMBALANCE; i.e. it is the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.  Here we can think in terms of TOWNING as a developing within the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  There, … I have just described the QUANTUM LOGIC relation which is between the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and the TOWNING within the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

Notice that there is a separate REFERENCE FRAME when we picture a TOWN GROWING within a MAP GRID so that we can watch the TOWN GROW as if it were a THING-IN-ITSELF getting larger, and we can measure it relative to the fixed MAP GRID.  However, in the space on the surface of a sphere, as the area of a development grows, there is a conjugate shrinking of the ‘wilderness area’ so that what is going on overall is TRANSFORMATION and there is only GROWTH with respect to an abstract ABSOLUTE REFERENCE FRAME which is intellectual abstraction and not sense-experience affirmable.

In other words, GROWTH could only happen within an ABSOLUTE SPACE and in the space on the surface of a sphere, GROWING (MALE ASSERTING) is only found in CONJUGATE RELATION with SHRINKING (FEMALE ACCOMMODATING).

WITHOUT THE MEASURING GRID we see only TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE where the TOWNING is NOT A SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT THING but a relational FEATURE within the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

So, we can imagine two groups of people where;

-1- ONE GROUP decides to FOCUS their observations on the TOWN that is growing within the ABSOLUTE MEASURING GRID

-2- ANOTHER GROUP decides to FOCUS their observations on the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE where the TOWNING BELONGS TO THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and is a FEATURE WITHIN the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  Here, there is no dependence on ABSOLUTE SPACE with ABSOLUTE REFERENCE GRIDS.

It would be a MISTAKE in example 2, to say ‘the TOWNING is GROWING because ‘the TOWNING’ is NOT an independent THING-IN-ITSELF with its own powers of GROWING, the TOWNING is a relational feature inextricably included within the ONE-NESS of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  That FIGURE-and-GROUND “ONE-NESS” is “QUANTUM LOGIC”.

The common WESTERN CULTURE MISTAKE is that we condition ourselves to think in language-based MALE ASSERTING terms even though, in our sense-experience reality, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING always takes PRECEDENCE.  If we are a race-car driver and our movements an the track are recorded by a paint sprayer installed on one of the wheels so as to leave a continuing trajectory traced out on the pavement so that we can review the trajectory when the cars have all departed, the interpretation of the trajectory in terms of our MALE-ASSERTIVE AUTHORING ACTIONS would be meaningless because our steering and movement has been inductively shaped by the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING OPENINGS in the relational traffic configuration and our MALE ASSERTING actions and developments are SECONDARY to the inductive influence of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING opening that is the PRIMARY SHAPER OF OUR ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.

Why even invoke the abstraction of a “REFERENCE FRAME” (since motion is relative as in ‘transformation’, why pretend movements are absolute by referring them to an absolute reference frame?  The imposing of the reference frame is what reduces relative movement to “NOTIONALLY ” ABSOLUTE MOTION (i.e. the reference frame is itself moving and if the reference frame is thought to be INFINITE in extent, we are thus INVENTING a BINARY LOGIC based on the distinction between the LOCAL and EXPLICIT FIGURE and the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.  With QUANTUM LOGIC, the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD INCLUDES EVERYTHING, including the LOCAL and EXPLICIT “CONDENSATIONS” which are not SEPARATE from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD but INCLUDED WITHIN IT.  Thus the LOCAL and EXPLICIT aspect is, as Schroedinger points out, SCHAUMKOMMENT (APPEARANCE).  WELCOME TO THE HOLOGRAPHIC UNIVERSE!.

“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm

In FACT, we might ask whether there is any such thing as MALE-ASSERTING ACTION other than as a grammatical abstraction.

THAT IS, … it is NOT THE SAME THING to understand our movement relative to the openings in the relational matrix of participants, as understanding our movement relative to an absolute reference frame or ‘coordinate system’.  In the first case, there are only relations as in QUANTUM LOGIC and there is no BINARY LOGIC based SPLIT between BEING and EMPTY SPACE.

Here we come up against the question of the “REALITY” of the notion of MALE ASSERTING ACTION since it seems to depend on the PERSISTING IDENTITY OF THE MALE ASSERTING AGENT and the PERSISTING IDENTITY OF THE FIELD OF OPERATIONS the MALE ASSERTING AGENT IS ENGAGING WITH, raising questions of the type “One can’t step into the same river twice because it is not the same river and not the same person stepping into it.  The short summary is; we are inclusions in transformation.

That is, here we come up against the question; WHEN is it appropriate to speak of our actions as MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS as if our actions are transpiring within an absolute empty space so that we can claim total ownership of ‘our own’ actions?

ANSWER:  NEVER!.   There is no such thing as INDEPENDENT MATERIAL OBJECTS IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE (i.e; that is BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION) and our sense-experience affirms our quantum logic inclusion as CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD aka the transforming relational continuum.

(more…)

OVERVIEW: We live in the all-including WAVE-FIELD.  We are INCLUSIONS (CONDENSATIONS) within the WAVE-FIELD.  The WAVE-FIELD embodies the conjugate relation of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING FIELD and MALE-ASSERTING MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS such that the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING FIELD INCLUDES THE MALE ASSERTING CONDENSATION, in a QUANTUM LOGIC “BOTH/AND” sense.  In WESTERN CULTURE, OBSCURANTIST abstraction has been popularized which falsely “PROMOTES” the NOTION of MALE-ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS AUTHORED by MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS, putting these SECONDARY CONDENSATIONS INTO PRIMARY REALITY CONSTITUTING STATUS supported by the use of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute the existence of LOCAL BEINGS with LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING actions and developments. By ELEVATING IN STATUS, THE WAVE-FIELD CONDENSINGS (dynamic forms within the TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD) to ABSOLUTE PERSISTING BEING STATUS WITH ‘NAMING’, and using GRAMMAR to equip these notional MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES with notional LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS, the familiar WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY IS CREATED with its BINARY LOGIC MATTER and EMPTY SPACE ARCHITECTURE.  REALITY REPRESENTATIONS based on this unnatural elevating of CONDENSATIONS (‘whorls’ in the continuing transformation) of the WAVE-FIELD to PRIMARY FIXED, EXPLICIT, PERSISTING MATERIAL CONTENT STATUS (by reducing the WAVE-FIELD to a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT) establishes an abstract BINARY LOGIC MATTER-and-SPACE SUBSTITUTE REALITY, the deployment of which as the OPERATIVE REALITY of WESTERN CULTURE is OBSCURANTISM, the simplicity of which shuts out the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC sense-experience affirmed reality. It is SIMPLER to use the BINARY LOGIC CONSTRUCTS such as the TOWN is GROWING, than to use the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC CONSTRUCTS such as ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.  The result has been the predominating use in WESTERN CULTURE of the MORE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC that has in turn led to OBSCURANTISM on an epidemic scale and to “LOCK-IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS”.

* * *

WHY DO WE STICK WITH BINARY LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE THAT IS DRIVING US (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS) CRAZY?

In systems science terms, WE ARE “LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS”, … a common example the ‘entrapment’ is where we buy a MICROSOFT P.C. but then discover that an APPLE is far better, but by that time we have added perhaps DEVELOPED applications that are custom-fitted to our MICROSOFT PERSONAL COMPUTER, so that while we can afford to purchase an APPLIE, … the cost of migrating all our applications is many times the cost of acquiring the APPLE, and these are COSTS THAT DO NOT ARISE if we STAY WITH WHAT WE ALREADY HAVE.

What we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have is a LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION OF THE WORLD that is a ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING based REPRESENTATION which DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, as where we in our BINARY LOGIC based Common Average European ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING languages say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, … instead of as the indigenous aboriginal in their QUANTUM LOGIC based languages say; ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ (in their TWO-SIDED conjugate relation including “BOTH” FEMALE ACCOMMODATING “AND” MALE ASSERTING).

NOTICE THAT in the LATTER, QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND language based representations, the MALE ALE ASSERTING is NO LONGER LOCAL AND EXPLICIT as it was in our WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based linguistic representation, so in our imagination, the QUANTUM LOGIC version lets see the TOWNING and the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE as being in a DANCE TOGETHER where the MALE-ASSERTING TOWNING is continually adapting to the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE IT IS AN INCLUDED PARTICIPANT IN.  In other words, these two things are REALLY ONLY ONE but have the APPEARANCE of TWO, so that it is possible to custom tailor our language based representation to treat the ONE as TWO so that instead of saying THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, we can say ‘the TOWN is GROWING as if it were INDEPENDENT of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and was instead situated within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, … so as to make sure that we treated the CONTAINER as a PASSIVE, NON-PARTICIPANT in the actions and development of the CONTENT.

By DIVORCING the CONTENT from the CONTAINER, we inherit what the Presocratics called ‘the BURDEN OF CONCRETENESS’ because NOW WE HAVE TO COME UP WITH WORDS TO CRAFT A REPRESENTATION WHERE “WE” MANAGE THE REPRESENTATION OF ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT, something that the Indigenous aboriginals don’t have to deal with in their language since they never adopted the ploy of DIVORCING THE CONTENT FROM THE CONTAINER as is the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-based-REPRESENTATION approach.

‘Toto, I’ve a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore!’

(more…)

SYNOPSIS: While the all-including WAVE-FIELD is the “mother” of “condensations” such as ourselves and other material forms, the representation scheme of our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE has oriented one-sidedly to the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE which is unfortunate because the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE within the WAVE-FIELD realm is PRIMARY and actually INCLUDES the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE in the sense that the WAVE-FIELD includes the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE FIELD.  The LOGIC of this TOPOLOGICAL RELATION is termed QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING medium.

The result of our WESTERN CULTURE having ‘built this unnatural PRIMACY of the MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE into our language architecture’ is OBSCURANTISM.  An example of OBSCURANTISM is the THIN SKULL RULE in WESTERN CULTURE LAW which assigns FULL AND SOLE AUTHORSHIP of the breaking of the skull, to MALE ASSERTING ACTION and thus to the asserting male.  The REALITY is, however, that it is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ‘give’ of the skull that ‘has the predominating ‘say’ in determining the extent of the damage and THIS IS OBSCURED by our WESTERN CULTURE habit of ATTRIBUTING FULL AND SOLE AUTHORSHIP to the MALE ASSERTING ACTION.

This PSYCHOLOGICAL ERROR is because WESTERN CULTURE employs in its language architectures, as the archetype structure for action and development, the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ACTION given by the combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR (e.g. “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, and PRODUCING products” … in contrast to indigenous aboriginal languages which capture the full WAVE-FIELD; i.e. BOTH FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE AND MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE, an ANDROGYNOUS combination which can be expressed by the phrase “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.

The TROUBLESOME RESULT (discussed in the following text of this essay) is that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is OBSCURANTIST, by dropping out the most essential aspect of WAVE-FIELD dynamics, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate, and retaining only the MALE ASSERTING conjugate.   This equates to SUBSTITUTING the simpler BINARY LOGIC for the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC as the basic logic for constructing representations of reality.   The RESULT, as pointed out by both Nietzsche and Bohm, is psychological FRAGMENTATION impacting the users of this language. That is, QUANTUM LOGIC identifies FIGURE and GROUND distinction through CONDENSATIONS within the FLUID WAVE-FIELD so that FIGURE and GROUND are ONE, while BINARY LOGIC identifies FIGURE and GROUND distinction through MATTER in EMPTY SPACE so that FIGURE and GROUND are TWO.

In order to visualize this difference between QUANTUM (BOTH/AND) LOGIC and BINARY (EITHER/OR) LOGIC we can imagine a PERSON first as a HOLOGIRAM where the CONDENSATION of energy presents the image as the BOTH/AND relation (BOTH CONDENSATION OF FIELD AND FIELD), ... and then we can imagine a PERSON as a MATERIAL BODY in a VOID where the MATTER and VOID presents the image as the EITHER MATTER/OR VOID relation.  Indigenous aboriginal languages are designed to support the QUANTUM LOGIC relation (e.g. THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) while Common Average European languages are designed to support the BINARY LOGIC relation ( e.g. The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services, as if within an empty space)..

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, insofar are we rely on our LANGUAGE-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS, are putting ourselves into a popularized ARTIFICIAL SUBSTITUTE REALITY infected with LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM that has believing that we are living in BINARY LOGIC pseudo-world featuring MALE-ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS while our psyches are haunted by the DEA ABSCONDITA, the ghost of the missing FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE aka the all-including WAVE-FIELD.

This SUBSTITUTE REALITY has been stripped of its NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT spiritual essence, and refurbished with HOLLOW IDOLS, inspiring Nietzsche’s title; Twilight of the Idols, or, How to Philosophize with a Hammer (Götzen-Dämmerung, oder, Wie man mit dem Hammer philosophiert).  Just IMAGINE our improved vision of reality if we smashed the IDOL of the MALE ASSERTING TOWN that is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING and could again see the ANDROGYNOUS TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE that is TOWNING.

* * *

QUANTUM LOGIC SCHOLIUM:  Language is simpler when it is REDUCED from the QUANTUM LOGIC of sense-experience reality to the intellectual abstraction of BINARY LOGIC, however the price paid for the SIMPLIFICATION is “OBSCURANTISM”.

And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion

In other words, it is SIMPLER to use OBSCURANTISM to fashion linguistic representations of sense-experience reality in the one-sided (binary logic based) terms of MALE ASSERTING, by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING.  Instead of capturing the all-including, all-pervading WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC which includes the CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using language that REDUCES THE QUANTUM LOGIC sense-experience affirmed reality to the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION of ABSOLUTE MATTER in ABSOLUTE EMPTY-INFINITE SPACE as in Copernicus’ ‘THE EARTH TURNS ROUND’ which is SIMPLER than the QUANTUM LOGIC capture; ‘THERE IS EARTHING IN THE TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD’.

Likewise, we have the ‘Thin Skull Rule’ which we have devised because IT IS SIMPLER TO IGNORE the variable FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE that co-determines, with the MALE-ASSERTING action, the unfolding TRANSFORMATION in the holographic WAVE-FIELD.  THAT IS, there is a general pattern of WESTERN CULTURE language-based SIMPLIFYING REDUCTION FROM QUANTUM LOGIC TO BINARY LOGIC by way of DROPPING OUT the FEMALE CONJUGATE from our LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATIONS, which amounts to language-based OBSCURANTISM.  Further examples of this pervasive WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM include how we use language to ACCEPT the SIMPLIFIED ASSERTION that the careless smoker “AUTHORS” the forest fire without ACKNOWLEDGING the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING of the forest that has been ‘conditioned’ by its inclusion in the desiccating hot summer atmosphere, and without which the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ACTION of the discarding of the cigarette (i.e. which could have been into a sopping wet rain-forest); i.e. this same act, would not have “AUTHORED” anything of the kind, this situation SCREAMING OUT TO US that this ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTIVE AUTHORING ACTION is the OBSCURANTIST RESULT of our DROPPING OUT of the real, actual, sense-experience affirmed FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

The same phenomena of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED OBSCURANTISM is found in the case of the skier who, so we say, ‘AUTHORS THE AVALANCHE’ by skiing across a freshly snow-loaded mountain slope which, as in the THIN SKULL RULE has the FEMALE POWER OF ACCOMMODATION, which is perfectly natural in the WAVE-FIELD world we all share inclusion in.  WHAT is NOT NATURAL is the BINARY LOGIC “SIMPLIFYING” ABSTRACTION wherein we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS use language to SIMPLIFY and REDUCE the NATURAL QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC to the ABSTRACT SIMPLIFYING TERMS OF BINARY LOGIC where we LINGUISTICALLY BREAK OUT THE MALE ASSERTING ASPECT of QUANTUM LOGIC as if it existed ON ITS OWN, DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (of the snow-loaded slope) and simply IGNORING it in an act of LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM.

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have thus developed a general pattern of fashioning an OBSCURANTIST “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” based on the linguistic REDUCTION of the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING—MALE ASSERTING “CONIUNCTIO OPPOSITORUM” aka THE WAVE-FIELD REALITY, …  by way of the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE CONJUGATE, so as to, as COPERNICUS SAYS and as is evident in the THIN SKULL RULE, “SIMPLIFY” the language-based REPRESENTATION of our actual SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD.  In other words, we OBSCURE by way of SUBSTITUTING BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION for QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY.

Our deploying of this LANGUAGE-based SIMPLIFICATION of SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY; i.e. our USING this ILLUSION of A BINARY LOGIC MATERIAL OBJECTS IN EMPTY SPACE “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” has given BEING a foundational role in our ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’.

“Nothing indeed has exercised a more simple power of persuasion hitherto than the error of Being, as it was formulated by the Eleatics for instance: in its favour are every word and every sentence that we utter! –Nietzsche

The employing of BEING as a SUBSTITUTE for QUANTUM LOGIC CONDENSATIONS IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, and the use of BEING in LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATIONS of REALITY, is the source of WESTERN PSYCHOLOGICAL and PHYSICAL FRAGMENTATION.

* * * END OF QUANTUM LOGIC SCHOLIUM * * *

My philosophical investigation findings come out to THIS; …. Our WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European Language Architecture (Benjamin Whorf’s designation) has a built-in OBSCURANTISM which REMOVES the FEMALE CONJUGATE of our WAVE-FIELD experience in its method of LANGUAGE CAPTURE/REPRESENTATION of our sense experience.

The ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ exemplifies what is a more general practice that we have ‘built in’ to our CAE Language architecture.  What we do with language is to acknowledge the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE and DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and in so doing we OBSCURE the WAVE-FIELD nature of our sense-experience.   In the case of the THIN SKULL RULE, we “PRETEND” that the full damage from a blow to the skull is coming from the MALE-ASSERTING BLOW and we simply DROP OUT any acknowledgement of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING or GIVING IN of the SKULL. We do the same in the case of the tossing of a cigarette butt that we claim AUTHORS the FOREST FIRE without mentioning (i.e. DROPPING OUT AND OBSCURING) the reality of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT hot and dry weather conditioned ACCOMMODATING QUALITY of the environment-conditioned FOREST) and thus formulate LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION that captures this unfolding reality in one-sided MALE-ASSERTING terms.

THUS, OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION OF REALITY DEPARTS FROM OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE INFORMED UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY because our sense experience informs us of the long hot and dry summer which is TRANSFORMING THE CONTAINING SPACE in which we and the forest are included, so that a LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION based one-sidedly on the MALE-ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE is INADEQUATE for explaining WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON IN A SENSE-EXPERIENCE context and if we go ahead and use ONLY THE MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE and say that the person discarding the cigarette butt AUTHORED THE FOREST FIRE, we will be guilty of OBSCURANTISM by not mentioning THE OBVIOUS, the stuff we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are in the habit of DROPPING OUT from our LANGUAGE-based REPRESENTATIONS; i.e. the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE that ALWAYS comes together with the MALE-ASSERTING CONJGUATE in the WAVE-FIELD world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion therein.

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE REPRESENTATIONS ARE DESIGNED TO DROP OUT THE FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE!!!  THE ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ is a clear example wherein full and sole authoring credit is given to the MALE-ASSERTING AGENT and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING, which is PRIMARY, is IGNORED.

(Note that in the wave-field understanding the ‘whorl in the flow’ is EMBODIED in the flow as requires QUANTUM LOGIC (where figure and ground are only ONE) rather than BINARY LOGIC where (where figure and ground are TWO).

(more…)