ted lumley

In our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY of inclusion as CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD, we are in a QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION where material forms such are ourselves, being CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD, are BOTH DISTINGUISHABLE FORMS and at the same time INCLUDED IN THE OVERALL TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.  “DIFFERENTIATION” is a mathematical abstracting technique wherein, for example, we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR to LINGUISTICALLY SEPARATE the (inherently inseparable) WHORLINGS FROM THE FLOWING (e.g. the HURRICANINGS from the ATMOSPHERING).

Since the reality is the WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE wherein the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING and the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING are in reality only the ONE DYNAMIC of TRANSFORMATION, WE ARE MISTAKEN in our WESTERN CULTURE use of LANGUAGE to NOTIONALLY SPLIT THE TWO APART and DISCARD the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, leaving only the MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE as if moving and interacting within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE (the passive substitute for the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE).

What I am describing here is not some real physical phenomenon but the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-based MATHEMATICAL-INTELLECTUAL OPERATION OF DIFFERENTIATION.  We may DIFFERENTIATE a MAN and a WOMAN in a LANGUAGE stimulated INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUAL OPERATION but BECAUSE WE SHARE INCLUSION AS CONDENSATIONS IN THE ONE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DIFFERENTIATE ONE THING FROM ANOTHER other than by APPEARANCE.

When we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’, the SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is that ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which is capturing TRANSFORMATION and NOT GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION.   TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is the only REAL (sense-experience-affirmable) dynamic and it is INTEGRATION based (the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is ‘opening up’ and ACCOMMODATING  the TOWNING as in the QUANTUM LOGIC relation).  BUT the words ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ “BRING TO MIND” (bring into  intellectual conceptualization) the imagery of a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF (i.e. ‘the TOWN’) which is experiencing DIFFERENTIATION based GROWTH.  In other words, the DIFFERENTIATION based SCENARIO wherein ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’.

TRANSFORMATION of the LANDSCAPE is “REAL” (sense-experience affirmable) but DIFFERENTIATION based GROWTH as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING is UNREAL ABSTRACTION.   For example, there cannot be GROWTH OF A TOWN without SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS in which case what is really going on is TRANSFORMATION.

Within the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, EVERYTHING IS INTEGRALLY RELATED and DIFFERENTIATION as where we speak about GROWTH as in the example, ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ is only APPEARANCE as captured with LANGUAGE that imposes the notion of DIFFERENTIATION.

DIFFERENTIATION can ONLY be APPEARANCE in the real sense-experience affirmed WAVE-FIELD WORLD wherein EVERYTHING IS INTEGRALLY RELATED (mitakuye oyasin).  Because WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE employs DIFFERENTIATION as LANGUAGE-stimulated INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUALIZATION even where INTEGRATION is the sense-experience affirmed FOUNDATIONAL REALITY, a schism is set up between LANGUAGE based PSEUDO-REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION and our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION in the all-including WAVE-FIELD.

For example, the DIFFERENTIATION of TWO TOWNS wherein we may describe the AREA and POPULATION of EACH TOWN CREATES the PROFILES of TWO DIFFERENT THINGS (the TWO TOWNS), describing their activities as SEPARATE and INDEPENDENT but our SENSE-EXPERIENCE reality is that we live within a COMMON CONTINUUM wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED.  In this case, it is only the NAMING and GRAMMAR that sets up the divided notion that EACH TOWN possesses the POWER of LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS and this is CONFUSING, and within that CONFUSION we have the FALSE notion of DIFFERENTIATION whereby we use LANGUAGE and GRAMMAR to impute the SEPARATE and INDEPENDENT IDENTITY of DIFFERENT TOWNS, both of which ‘are GROWING’, but that is just TALK.

There are no SEPARATE and INDEPENDENT “DIFFERENT TOWNS” in our ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD WORLD.  So, here we must concede that ‘everything is related’ (mitakuye oyasin) and that the NOTION of DIFFERENT TOWNS is LANGUAGE-STIMULATED INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION.  There are only DIFFERENCES IN APPEARANCE; i.e. ‘everything is related’ in that we and all things share inclusion in the all-including TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

There is a MAJOR ERROR in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY that brings with it FRAGMENTATION.  FRAGMENTATION is INVOKED and PERPETUATED BY WESTERN CULTURE SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE where DIFFERENTIATED APPEARANCE is CONFUSED for SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY; e.g. where the GROWTH OF THE TOWN is a LANGUAGE based DUMBED DOWN reduction of the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE.  There is no such thing as GROWTH in the TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD; GROWTH is PSYCHOLOGICAL ILLUSION stimulated by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.

The thing to keep in mind here is that the only SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE REALITY is that of our inclusion in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, and while we can and do SPEAK IN TERMS OF ‘THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN’, there is NO SUCH THING without the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS in which case what is going on here is that we share inclusion in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ‘has a problem’ here but NOT MODERN PHYSICS and NOT indigenous aboriginal languages and NOT Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, because it is ONLY WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that EMPLOYS the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE on its own (i.e. ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services) as if that constituted ‘REALITY’, without mentioning the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ANABLING OPENING (SHRINKING) OF THE WILDERENESS.

* * *

MODERN PHYSICS understands the world as a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD, consistent with the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta Worldview.  This world is a QUANTUM LOGIC world that differs intrinsically from the BINARY LOGIC world of DIFFERENTIATED MATTER and EMPTY SPACE

The QUANTUM LOGIC worldview is where material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD, as in Nietzsche’s following description;

Nietzsche’s “Dionysian world” the will to power and the eternal recurrence [from the notebooks, 1885]

And do you know what “the world” is to me? Shall I show it to you in my mirror? This world: a monster of energy, without beginning, without end, a firm, iron magnitude of force that does not grow bigger or smaller, that does not expend itself but only transforms itself; as a whole, of unalterable size, a household without expenses or losses, but likewise without increase or income; enclosed by “nothingness” as by a boundary; not something blurry or wasted, not something endlessly extended, but set in a definite space as a definite force, and not a space that might be “empty” here or there, but rather as force throughout, as a play of forces and waves of forces, at the same time one and many, increasing here and at the same time decreasing there; a sea of forces flowing and rushing together, eternally changing, eternally flooding back, with tremendous years of recurrence, with an ebb and a flood of its forms; out of the simplest forms striving toward the most complex, out of the stillest, most rigid, coldest forms toward the hottest, most turbulent, most self-contradictory, and then again returning home to the simple out of this abundance, out of the play of contradictions back to the joy of concord, still affirming itself in this uniformity of its courses and its years, blessing itself as that which must return eternally, as a becoming that knows no satiety, no disgust, no weariness: this, my Dionysian world of the eternally self-creating, the eternally self-destroying, this mystery world of the twofold voluptuous delight, my “beyond good and evil,” without goal, unless the joy of the circle is itself a goal; without will, unless a ring feels good will toward itself—do you want a name for this world? A solution for all its riddles? A light for you, too, you best-concealed, strongest, most intrepid, most midnightly men? —This world is the will to power—and nothing besides! And you yourselves are also this will to power—and nothing besides! (The Will to Power §1067)

Nietzsche is clearly REMOVING the common WESTERN CULTURE FOUNDATION given to LOCAL MATERIAL BEING, as also in his critique of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which sets up, in LANGUAGE-BASED ABSTRACTION, the concept of LOCAL AUTHORING;

“Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”; -but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting.  If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.” – To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” — Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

NO MORE LOCAL AUTHORING based on BINARY LOGIC (“EITHER” is “OR” is not), ONLY TRANSFORMATION based on QUANTUM LOGIC (“BOTH” is “AND” is not), as in MODERN PHYSICS and the all-including TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD medium wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

  (more…)

My philosophical investigations have found themselves to have much in common with those of Nietzsche and Bohm and also Vygotsky who to me deserves special mention for the CLARITY of his SUM-UP of architecture of THOUGHT and LANGUAGE, not simply ‘as in common practice’, but with respect to our early natural development where its WAVE-FIELD structure is evident.  Vygotsky in the following few sentences, not only captures the WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE of our THOUGHT AND LANGUAGE system but how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ‘screw up’ by DROPPING OUT (of the model of what is going on) the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and acknowledging ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE.

The great problem of FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE UNDERSTANDING is rooted in our SIMPLIFYING (dumbing-down) of LINGUISTIC COMMUNICATIONS by the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and thus constructing a BINARY LOGIC MATTER-and-SPACE based PSEUDO-REALITY that ‘works’ as a simplistic communications interface  even as it DROPS OUT the capability of full-blown WAVE-FIELD conceptualization.  While the full WAVE-FIELD CAPABLE Language of indigenous aboriginals communicates the equivalent of ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ (which is QUANTUM LOGIC based wherein there is capture of BOTH the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate AND the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, … we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, following a habitual to our culture strategy described by Piaget, are teaching our children to DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate and ‘going with’ ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, hence ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’  … which invokes the LOCAL AUTHORING ABSTRACTION (at the expense of DROPPING OUT acknowledgement of the all including WAVE-FIELD dynamic).

GOODBYE QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD COMPREHENSION IN LANGUAGE, HELLO REDUCED BINARY LOGIC MATERIAL WORLD VIEW!

The following INSIGHTFUL CRITIQUE by Vygotsky captures this HUMONGOUS DROP-OUT in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that REMOVES THE WAVE-FIELD CONCEPTUALIZING capability.

“Though fundamentally different in nature, the development of scientific and spontaneous concepts represent two sides of the same concept formation:

. . .

“Our disagreement with Piaget centers on one point only, but an important point. He assumes that development and instruction are entirely separate, incommensurate processes, that the function of instruction is merely to introduce adult ways of thinking, which conflict with the child’s own and eventually supplant them. Such a supposition stems from the old psychological tradition of separating the structural from the functional aspects of development.” –Vygotsky

Whether we use the terms ‘REAL’ component and ‘IMAGINARY’ component in speaking of WAVE-FIELD reality, or whether we use ‘MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING’ for ‘REAL’ and ‘FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING’, we are speaking of the same ‘ANDROGYNOUS’ WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE of reality which WE CAN LOOK AT as LOCAL and EXPLICIT (see that town over there and how it is growing).  This is the CROW’S EYE, BINARY LOGIC STARING MODE of the DIFFERENTIATED VOYEUR OBSERVER.

We also have the option of the INCLUDED OBSERVER where we are SWIMMING the all-including WAVE-FIELD REALITY acknowledging that we are CONDSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD and the INTEGRATED QUANTUM LOGIC relation (where the observer is INCLUDED in that which he is observing).

The former (DIFFERENTIATING) view serves up LOCAL and EXPLICIT structure as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ while in the latter (INTEGRATING) view serves up the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT view as in ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

Vygotsky terms the LOCAL and EXPLICIT view the ‘SCIENTIFIC VIEW’ and the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT view the ‘SPONTANEOUS VIEW’, and points out that (as in a WAVE-FIELD reality) scientific and spontaneous concepts represent two sides of the same concept formation:

NO-ONE DECREED THAT IN COMING UP WITH ‘LANGUAGE’ AS A MEANS OF SHARING OUR COMPLEX SENSE-EXPERIENCE OF INCLUSION IN THE WAVE-FIELD, THAT WE HAD TO ‘SIMPLIFY SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY’ IN ORDER TO SIMPLIFY LANGUAGE BASED REPORTING ON OUR ‘SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY’, … AND WHILE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS AND ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS went forward in their LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE with the full un-simplified QUANTUM LOGIC FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate (no fragmentation needed here)

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have been in the habit, perhaps since the era of Parmenides (500 BCE) of using a WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate WHICH SERVES AS THE NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT ‘INTEGRATING VESSEL’ THAT BRINGS RELATIONAL MEANING (“CONTEXT”) TO THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT “DIFFERENTIATED FRAGMENTS” (“CONTENT”).

(more…)

INTRODUCTION:

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS need to get out of our BINARY LOGIC FIXATION and move into the QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY, but something is clearly HOLDING US BACK!  WHAT IS IT!

My sense is that WHAT IS HOLDING US BACK is “TRUTH”.

We have become DEPENDENT on our WESTERN CULTURE LOGICAL TRUTH which gives us a sense of SECURITY and SOLID FOUNDATION on the TRUTH that we can rely on.

UNFORTUNATELY, “LOGICAL TRUTH” is not the same thing as “REALITY”.  As Goedel’s Theorem proves, BINARY LOGIC TRUTH is INNATELY INCOMPLETE so that a SIMPLE LOGICAL TRUTH can be overtaken by a LESS SIMPLE LOGICAL TRUTH.

Modern physics has reaffirmed what the indigenous aboriginal peoples, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents have long held, that QUANTUM LOGIC gives us a LESS SIMPLE LOGICAL TRUTH than BINARY LOGIC which is based on BOTH/AND rather than EITHER/OR, so for example, the BOTH/AND QUANTUM LOGIC TRUTH of ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is a “LESS SIMPLE TRUTH” than “The TOWN is GROWING”.  The LESS SIMPLE TRUTH does not “MAKE THE SIMPLE TRUTH WRONG”.  MEANWHILE, SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is beyond the reach of LANGUAGE-based LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS THAT CAPTURE LOGICAL TRUTHS.  “The Tao that can be told is not the true Tao” –Lao Tzu.

Our WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT global social collective HAS A PROBLEM.  We are unable to, or are unwilling to UPDATE our old SIMPLE (BINARY LOGIC) TRUTHS with new LESS-SIMPLE (QUANTUM LOGIC) TRUTHS.  People resist even LISTENING to the arguments showing the superiority of the new LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC TRUTHS.  WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS commonly say; ‘READ MY LIPS!  I NEVER GOT WHERE I AM TODAY NOT KNOWING WHAT THE TRUTH IS”.

That’s the trouble with LOGICAL TRUTH, it can be TRUE but INCOMPLETE, so that where one man insists that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ can prove this to be TRUE.  Likewise, the man who insists that ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, which is a LESS SIMPLE TRUTH, can likewise prove this to be TRUE.  As far as REALITY GOES, that is far beyond the reach of LOGICAL TRUTHS as Lao Tzu points out.  So we are STUCK WITH TRUTHS that may range from SIMPLE to LESS SIMPLE and we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are now living in an era where Modern physics has confirmed that the LESS SIMPLE LOGICAL TRUTHS captured in indigenous aboriginal LANGUAGES are more informative re our sense-experience reality than our WESTERN CULTURE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE captured LOGICAL TRUTHS.

The example given above is a case in point; i.e. the QUANTUM LOGIC “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” is LESS SIMPLE than the BINARY LOGIC “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”:

WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are digging in their heels and are resisting even listening to someone’s purported NEW TRUTH because it seems to infer that their TRUTHS, such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ are NO LONGER TRUE and they react against that think that such a claim is BULLSHIT because “they know for sure that THEIR TOWN IS GROWING”.  But that is NOT THE POINT.  The point is not that the established TRUTHS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ are “WRONG”, the point is that TRUTHS can be SIMPLE and LESS SIMPLE and the BINARY LOGIC TRUTH ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ is a SIMPLER TRUTH than the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC TRUTH ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.   

This essay reviews the common misunderstanding, in WESTERN CULTURE, of the INCOMPLETENESS of LOGICAL TRUTH.

 * * *

This essay provides a SHORTLIST from the WESTERN CULTURE PATTERN of LANGUAGE-BASED LOGICAL SCREW-UPS I HAVE REVIEWED, which have been pointed out by various philosophical Investigators such as Nietzsche, Bohm, Schroedinger, Wittgenstein, Vygotsky and more.

This list of WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC LOGICAL SCREW-UPS POINTS TO ‘ONE PLACE’ that I will try to capture as succinctly and clearly as I can, as follows;

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE that we are using to construct a SHAREABLE CONCEPTUALIZATION that passes for REALITY is BINARY LOGIC based, and thus falls prey to that general exposure of BINARY logic given by Goedel’s Theorem; i.e. “All FINITE BINARY LOGIC PROPOSITIONS ARE INCOMPLETE”.  This means that our BINARY LOGIC PROPOSITIONS can be TRUE but with weaker or stronger grounding in REALITY and therefore that there may be other SYSTEMS of LOGIC, such as QUANTUM LOGIC that are also TRUE but are LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC, and this is what I have been finding in my work and it is the source of the difference in LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of REALITY since WESTERN CULTURE REALITY is commonly based on BINARY LOGIC while INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL REALITY is commonly based on QUANTUM LOGIC.

A simple example comparing the two is as follows;

QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY:   “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.  This QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY has an ANDROGYNOUS (FEMALE ACCOMMODATING—MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE STRUCTURE) as can be understood from the example sentence.  QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY is the WAVE-FIELD REALITY of INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS, ADVAITA VEDANTA and MODERN PHYSICS.

BINARY LOGIC REALITY :  “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”.  This BINARY LOGIC REALITY has a one sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY STRUCTURE which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (as can be seen from he example sentence). BINARY LOGIC REALITY is the MECHANISTIC REALITY of MATERIAL FORMS INTERACTING IN EMPTY SPACE OF WESTERN CULTURE

(more…)

Since the term “GROWTH” depends on the abstract concept of a THING-IN-ITSELF capable of enlarging in its own right, as if isolatable in an absolute empty space, there is NO SUCH THING AS “GROWTH” in the real world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.  There is ONLY “TRANSFORMATION”..

* * * 

I would encourage anyone NOT FAMILIAR with the MATHEMATICAL DESCRIPTION of WAVES to review the very basics, and would argue that THIS MAKES SENSE BECAUSE WE LIVE IN A WAVE-FIELD WORLD.  That is the finding of Modern physics and it agrees with the understanding of the structure of reality as understood by INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.

I tell you why I am saying this because, if you are like myself and have been ‘born and raised’ speaking one of the Common Average European Languages such as ENGLISH, then you, like myself, have bee CONDITIONED to think in terms of REALITY A SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO REALITY which is BINARY LOGIC BASED, and I can describe this fairly easily but that doesn’t stop us from continuing to have a knee-jerk reflex of THINKING in terms of a BINARY LOGIC BASED SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO-REALITY.

In order to AVOID the use of a SIMPLIFYING BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE based PSEUDO-REALITY CONCEPTUALIZTION, and be able to have LANGUAGE-based exchanges that are capable of QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, we have to change our language architecture and speak language that has the LESS SIMPLE capabilities of the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.

Our Common Average European LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS TOO SIMPLE to capture WAVE-FIELD CONCEPTUALIZATION because it “DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE”, reducing (simplifying) our WAVE-FIELD based SENSE-EXPERIENCE to one-sided MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT (e.g. ‘The TOWN IS GROWING’) whereas the LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE we need for CONCEPTUALIZING the WAVE-FIELD REALITY we are included in must employ the conjugate WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE which is the ANDROGYNOUS  FEMALE ACCOMMODATING — MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE RELATION; e.g. ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’

This is QUANTUM LOGIC structure, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.   QUANTUM LOGIC captures the relationship that associates with our understanding of SPACE as an ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka the WAVE-FIELD) within which ‘material forms’ are CONDENSATIONS.  That is QUANTUM LOGIC and in order to speak and write in a manner consistent with the actual physical structure of REALITY, we need to us QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE which I have highlighted with BOLD ITALIC AND YELLOW BACKGROUND like this; i.e. ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’

We can see that the relational structure here is one in which FIGURE and GROUND are ONE; i.e. the TOWNING is INCLUDED IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which is the QUANTUM LOGIC relation.

(more…)