AUTHOR’S PREFACE: 

 

The NORMAL WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT is NOT going to get the DEEPER MESSAGE in this note (without a special effort) because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have been psychologically conditioned to believe in an ABSTRACT PSEUDO-REALITY featuring the INDEPENDENT NATION.  THERE ARE NO ‘INDEPENDENT NATIONS’ in THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao.   The REJECTION of the EXISTENCE OF THE INDEPENDENT NATION is NECESSARY for one to be ABLE TO SEE/UNDERSTAND the REAL REALITY of our inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD and the Tao.  The point is the MODERN CULTURAL CONDITIONING that would have us believe in the INDEPENDENT NATION, while the EGO can’t let go ot it, is ABSTRACTION based on the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which IMPLIES (A) the EXISTENCE OF THE LOCAL NATION and (B) ITS OWN GRAMMAR-GIVEN LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT. The concept of the INDEPENDENT NATION, embellished by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, has us THINKING (WRONGLY) in terms of the INDEPENDENT NATION with its OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.

 

The ISSUE concerning RUSSIA’s rejection of the INDEPENDENT NATION status of the UKRAINE, HAS ROOTS WHICH GO MUCH DEEPER AND QUESTION THE LEGITIMACY OF THE VERY CONCEPT OF “THE INDEPENDENT NATION”.  If

If WE CONFINE OUR INQUIRY TO THE QUESTION OF THE LEGITIMACY OF THE UKRAINE’S CLAIM TO SOVEREIGN NATION STATUS, THERE WE SHALL BE MISSING THE NEEDED INQUIRY THAT WILL EXPOSE THE ILLEGITIMACY OF THE CONCEPT OF THE SOVEREIGN STATE..

* * *

It is common for readers to ACCEPT THE NOTION OF THE INDEPENDENT NATION as if it were REALITY (which it is NOT) which leads to social FRAGMENTATION through belief in the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which implies LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development (e.g. on the part of the so-called “INDEPENDENT NATION”).

The concept of the ‘INDEPENDENT NATION’ is DELUSION which has nevertheless come to play A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in our GLOBAL APPROACH to CONCEPTUALIZING “REALITY”, or more aptly, ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’.  Our GLOBALLY POPULAR ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’ is this DOUBLE ERROR based SUBSTITUTE REALITY featuring INDEPENDENT NATIONS as LOCAL ACTION and DEVELOPMENT AUTHORING AGENTS.   However, our sense-experience reality is of our inclusion in ONE transforming relational continuum wherein THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN ‘INDEPENDENT NATION’.   Modern physics and systems sciences have pointed this out but the HABIT of constructing SUBSTITUTE REALITIES incorporating the ABSTRACTION of INDEPENDENT NATIONS continues to infuse the ERRONEOUS notion of “INDEPENDENT NATIONS” into the MODERN PSYCHE, inducing ARTIFICIAL FRAGMENTATION and UNNECESSARY CONFLICT.

 

The UNCRITICAL acceptance of the CONCEPT of the INDEPENDENT NATION succeeds because of the popularity of the EGO inflation deriving from the ERRONEOUS sense of LOCAL AUTHORING implied by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that comes bundled in with that ABSTRACTION of the INDEPENDENT NATION.

 

The QUESTION IS “NOT” … “DOES THE UKRAINE QUALIFY AS A LEGITIMATE “INDEPENDENT NATION”?.  THE QUESTION IS INSTEAD: HOW HAVE WE BEEN HOODWINKED INTO ACCEPTING THE UNREAL ABSTRACTION OF “THE INDEPENDENT NATION”, being as how we live “in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence?

 

A fixed lattice-work of INDEPENDENT NATION grid-cells may be laid over the global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence so that new developments may be labelled according to their grid-cell of emergence.   The fact remains that while those grid cells signify INDEPENDENT NATIONS, this does not mean that developments that emerge through them derive from them’ since we live ”in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence.”.  In KORZYBSKI’s terms; ‘the map is not the territory”

 

 

* * * end-of-author’s-preface * * *

 

 

 

NATIONALISM, the now GLOBAL game of PRETENDING the “INDEPENDENCE” of “NATIONS” stems from the ABSTRACTION of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as Nietzsche has pointed out.

 

If we choose to OVERLOOK THE SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA in our modern GLOBAL CULTURE that, as Bohm and Nietzsche both point out, is the source of FRAGMENTATION that is both PSYCHOLOGICAL and PHYSICAL and NATIONALISM is part of it.

 

The battle over the STATUS of the UKRAINE stems from the ABSTRACT PROMOTION OF FRAGMENTATION by way of NATIONALISM.

 

There is no such thing as an INDEPENDENT NATION.  The FRAGMENTATION into NATIONS is not grounded in our sense-experience, it is ABSTRACTION that is popularized ONLY by groups of people coming together and AGREEING TO SUPPORT THE UNREAL ABSTRACTION OF NAMING-BASED INDEPENDENT NATIONS.  This is a crazy intellectual abstraction based idea that breeds WARS.

 

Sentient forms in nature do not participate in this ABSTRACT CREATION OF IMAGINARY “INDEPENDENT NATIONS” or “INDPENDENT BEINGS” of any type.  Indigenous aboriginals DO NOT PARTICIPATE in the ABSTRTACT CREATION OF IMAGINARY “INDEPENDENT FRAGMENTS” of SPACE that are DEFINED by IMAGINARY BOUNDARY LINES.   This inventing of INDEPENDENT STATES FRAGMENTS THE PSYCHE and from there it FRAGMENTS the social collective.

 

FRAGMENTATION is ILLUSION.  We live within a transforming relational continuum where FRAGMENTATION DOES NOT EXIST other than in the LANGUAGE STIMULATED ABSTRACTIONS OF THE PSYCHE.    HERE’s HOW THIS FRAGMENTATION HAPPENS,

 

-1-A social collective invents a name such as UKRAINE and associates it with a GEOMETRIC (imaginary line based) CLOSED FIGURE superimposed on a MAP based REPRESENTATION of the EARTH.   This FRAGMENTING of the SURFACE AREA of he earth is PURELY AND SOLELY IMAGINARY IN ITS FOUNDATIONAL ASPECT and the GEOMETRIC AREAL FORMS are simply DECLARED TO EXIST and this is BACKUP UP by FORCE OF ARMS of the SUPPORTERS who are DEFINING the AREA and DECLARING IT TO BE SOMETHING that REALLY EXISTS.

 

-2- The EXISTENCE of these FRAGMENTED land areas is something that is INVENTED BY INTELLECTUAL DECLARATION and is sustained by FORCE by the SUPPORTERS who organizing POLICING INFRASTRUCTURE to SECURE the IMAGINARY FRAGMENTATION that they have INTELLECTUALLY INVENTED.  There is NO OTHER BASIS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF INDEPENDENT FRAGMENTS than INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION, but once many people SWEAR OATHS OF ALLEGIEANCE to COMMIT THEIR LIVES TO THE DEFENCE OF THE EXISTENCE OF THE IMAGINARY “INDEPENDENT FRAGMENTS”, we have the system that is now in place that we refer to as NATIONALISM.   It is established by BUTE FORCE as we know from the wars between European COLONIZERS who have been imposing this system around the globe and indigenous peoples who have never agreed to put such INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACT FRAGMENTATION into an unnatural precedence over sense-experience of inclusion in A SENSE EXPERIENCE REALITY OF INCLUSION IN A WORLD CHARACTERIZED BY GLOBAL INTERCONNECTEDNESS AND MUTUAL INTERDEPENDENCE.

 

-3- The problem of the UKRAINE begins with the problem of INTELLECTUAL FRAGMNTING of our sense-experience of INCLUSION IN A WORLD CHARACTERIZED BY GLOBAL INTERCONNECTION AND MUTUAL INTERDEPENDENCE as is the fining of ‘systems scientists’ and as is the finding of indigenous aboriginals and ANYONE who opts for the NATURAL understanding of the world wherein our sense-experience is kept in a natural precedence over our intellectual abstraction.  As David Bohm and Nietzsche have pointed out, LANGUAGE of a certain type has given us the habit of construction SUBSTITUTE REALITIES based on BINARY LOGIC.  This SUBSTITUTE REALITIES FEATURE the SPLITTING APART of FIGURE and GROUND using BINARY LOGIC  by way of the DOUBLE ERROR (Nietzsche) of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  Once we popularize language usage such as POLAND is GROWING in POPULATION and is continuing to advance in its DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods and services, this “DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR” inserts into the INTELLECT, the MISTAKEN CONCEPT OF “LOCAL AUTHORING” of actions and development.  Thus the language based popular usage of POLAND does this and that or ‘the UKRAINE does this and that’ builds a matrix of related propositions that impute support for the LOCAL EXISTENCE and LOCAL AUTHORING POWER of the IMAGINED ENTITY associated with the NAME in the DOUBLE ERROR combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR; e.g. “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services” is a DOUBLE ERROR based SUBSTITUTE REALITY that takes shape IN THE INTELLECTUALIZING MIND even though the world of our sense-experience continues to be one of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum.

 

-4- The UKRAINE DOES NOT EXIST.   The notion of its LOCAL EXISTENCE of a NATION derives from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR and THE NATION takes on a notional LOCAL EXISTENCE by popular usage of this NAMING and GRAMMAR based (DOUBLE ERROR BASED) construction of an INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION BASED SUBSITUTE REALITY.  In other words, the NATION OF POLAND (or etc.) ONLY EXISTS IN THE LANGUAGE-STIMULTATED  INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTING MIND.   This technique of INVENTING NATIONS with notional LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS  using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR is unique to the COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES (which includes the RUSSIAN language) and DOES NOT INCLUDE indigenous aboriginals whose language is FLOW BASED and does NOT give itself up to the trickery of FRAGMENTATION by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  For example, Bohm’s RHEOMODE language was designed to AVOID FRAGMENTATION and the indigenous aboriginal languages also have this design, thus, for example, one would say the equivalent of THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, where WE, with our Common Average European LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE would say ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services, IMPLYING LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS, which, as already noted, the systems scientists have exposed as DELUSION since our sense-experience affirms OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE REALITY OF INCLUSION IN A WORLD CHARACTERIZED BY GLOBAL INTERCONNECTEDNESS AND MUTUAL INTERDEPENDENCE.

(more…)