Archive for June, 2022
SYNOPSIS: While the all-including WAVE-FIELD is the “mother” of “condensations” such as ourselves and other material forms, the representation scheme of our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE has oriented one-sidedly to the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE which is unfortunate because the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE within the WAVE-FIELD realm is PRIMARY and actually INCLUDES the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE in the sense that the WAVE-FIELD includes the CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE FIELD. The LOGIC of this TOPOLOGICAL RELATION is termed QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING medium.
The result of our WESTERN CULTURE having ‘built this unnatural PRIMACY of the MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE into our language architecture’ is OBSCURANTISM. An example of OBSCURANTISM is the THIN SKULL RULE in WESTERN CULTURE LAW which assigns FULL AND SOLE AUTHORSHIP of the breaking of the skull, to MALE ASSERTING ACTION and thus to the asserting male. The REALITY is, however, that it is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ‘give’ of the skull that ‘has the predominating ‘say’ in determining the extent of the damage and THIS IS OBSCURED by our WESTERN CULTURE habit of ATTRIBUTING FULL AND SOLE AUTHORSHIP to the MALE ASSERTING ACTION.
This PSYCHOLOGICAL ERROR is because WESTERN CULTURE employs in its language architectures, as the archetype structure for action and development, the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ACTION given by the combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR (e.g. “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, and PRODUCING products” … in contrast to indigenous aboriginal languages which capture the full WAVE-FIELD; i.e. BOTH FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE AND MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE, an ANDROGYNOUS combination which can be expressed by the phrase “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.
The TROUBLESOME RESULT (discussed in the following text of this essay) is that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is OBSCURANTIST, by dropping out the most essential aspect of WAVE-FIELD dynamics, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate, and retaining only the MALE ASSERTING conjugate. This equates to SUBSTITUTING the simpler BINARY LOGIC for the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC as the basic logic for constructing representations of reality. The RESULT, as pointed out by both Nietzsche and Bohm, is psychological FRAGMENTATION impacting the users of this language. That is, QUANTUM LOGIC identifies FIGURE and GROUND distinction through CONDENSATIONS within the FLUID WAVE-FIELD so that FIGURE and GROUND are ONE, while BINARY LOGIC identifies FIGURE and GROUND distinction through MATTER in EMPTY SPACE so that FIGURE and GROUND are TWO.
In order to visualize this difference between QUANTUM (BOTH/AND) LOGIC and BINARY (EITHER/OR) LOGIC we can imagine a PERSON first as a HOLOGIRAM where the CONDENSATION of energy presents the image as the BOTH/AND relation (BOTH CONDENSATION OF FIELD AND FIELD), ... and then we can imagine a PERSON as a MATERIAL BODY in a VOID where the MATTER and VOID presents the image as the EITHER MATTER/OR VOID relation. Indigenous aboriginal languages are designed to support the QUANTUM LOGIC relation (e.g. THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) while Common Average European languages are designed to support the BINARY LOGIC relation ( e.g. The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services, as if within an empty space)..
WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, insofar are we rely on our LANGUAGE-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS, are putting ourselves into a popularized ARTIFICIAL SUBSTITUTE REALITY infected with LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM that has believing that we are living in BINARY LOGIC pseudo-world featuring MALE-ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS while our psyches are haunted by the DEA ABSCONDITA, the ghost of the missing FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE aka the all-including WAVE-FIELD.
This SUBSTITUTE REALITY has been stripped of its NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT spiritual essence, and refurbished with HOLLOW IDOLS, inspiring Nietzsche’s title; Twilight of the Idols, or, How to Philosophize with a Hammer (Götzen-Dämmerung, oder, Wie man mit dem Hammer philosophiert). Just IMAGINE our improved vision of reality if we smashed the IDOL of the MALE ASSERTING TOWN that is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING and could again see the ANDROGYNOUS TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE that is TOWNING.
* * *
QUANTUM LOGIC SCHOLIUM: Language is simpler when it is REDUCED from the QUANTUM LOGIC of sense-experience reality to the intellectual abstraction of BINARY LOGIC, however the price paid for the SIMPLIFICATION is “OBSCURANTISM”.
And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion
In other words, it is SIMPLER to use OBSCURANTISM to fashion linguistic representations of sense-experience reality in the one-sided (binary logic based) terms of MALE ASSERTING, by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING. Instead of capturing the all-including, all-pervading WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC which includes the CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using language that REDUCES THE QUANTUM LOGIC sense-experience affirmed reality to the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION of ABSOLUTE MATTER in ABSOLUTE EMPTY-INFINITE SPACE as in Copernicus’ ‘THE EARTH TURNS ROUND’ which is SIMPLER than the QUANTUM LOGIC capture; ‘THERE IS EARTHING IN THE TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD’.
Likewise, we have the ‘Thin Skull Rule’ which we have devised because IT IS SIMPLER TO IGNORE the variable FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE that co-determines, with the MALE-ASSERTING action, the unfolding TRANSFORMATION in the holographic WAVE-FIELD. THAT IS, there is a general pattern of WESTERN CULTURE language-based SIMPLIFYING REDUCTION FROM QUANTUM LOGIC TO BINARY LOGIC by way of DROPPING OUT the FEMALE CONJUGATE from our LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATIONS, which amounts to language-based OBSCURANTISM. Further examples of this pervasive WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM include how we use language to ACCEPT the SIMPLIFIED ASSERTION that the careless smoker “AUTHORS” the forest fire without ACKNOWLEDGING the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING of the forest that has been ‘conditioned’ by its inclusion in the desiccating hot summer atmosphere, and without which the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ACTION of the discarding of the cigarette (i.e. which could have been into a sopping wet rain-forest); i.e. this same act, would not have “AUTHORED” anything of the kind, this situation SCREAMING OUT TO US that this ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTIVE AUTHORING ACTION is the OBSCURANTIST RESULT of our DROPPING OUT of the real, actual, sense-experience affirmed FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.
The same phenomena of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED OBSCURANTISM is found in the case of the skier who, so we say, ‘AUTHORS THE AVALANCHE’ by skiing across a freshly snow-loaded mountain slope which, as in the THIN SKULL RULE has the FEMALE POWER OF ACCOMMODATION, which is perfectly natural in the WAVE-FIELD world we all share inclusion in. WHAT is NOT NATURAL is the BINARY LOGIC “SIMPLIFYING” ABSTRACTION wherein we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS use language to SIMPLIFY and REDUCE the NATURAL QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC to the ABSTRACT SIMPLIFYING TERMS OF BINARY LOGIC where we LINGUISTICALLY BREAK OUT THE MALE ASSERTING ASPECT of QUANTUM LOGIC as if it existed ON ITS OWN, DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (of the snow-loaded slope) and simply IGNORING it in an act of LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM.
We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have thus developed a general pattern of fashioning an OBSCURANTIST “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” based on the linguistic REDUCTION of the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING—MALE ASSERTING “CONIUNCTIO OPPOSITORUM” aka THE WAVE-FIELD REALITY, … by way of the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE CONJUGATE, so as to, as COPERNICUS SAYS and as is evident in the THIN SKULL RULE, “SIMPLIFY” the language-based REPRESENTATION of our actual SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD. In other words, we OBSCURE by way of SUBSTITUTING BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION for QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY.
Our deploying of this LANGUAGE-based SIMPLIFICATION of SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY; i.e. our USING this ILLUSION of A BINARY LOGIC MATERIAL OBJECTS IN EMPTY SPACE “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” has given BEING a foundational role in our ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’.
“Nothing indeed has exercised a more simple power of persuasion hitherto than the error of Being, as it was formulated by the Eleatics for instance: in its favour are every word and every sentence that we utter! –Nietzsche
The employing of BEING as a SUBSTITUTE for QUANTUM LOGIC CONDENSATIONS IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, and the use of BEING in LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATIONS of REALITY, is the source of WESTERN PSYCHOLOGICAL and PHYSICAL FRAGMENTATION.
* * * END OF QUANTUM LOGIC SCHOLIUM * * *
My philosophical investigation findings come out to THIS; …. Our WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European Language Architecture (Benjamin Whorf’s designation) has a built-in OBSCURANTISM which REMOVES the FEMALE CONJUGATE of our WAVE-FIELD experience in its method of LANGUAGE CAPTURE/REPRESENTATION of our sense experience.
The ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ exemplifies what is a more general practice that we have ‘built in’ to our CAE Language architecture. What we do with language is to acknowledge the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE and DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and in so doing we OBSCURE the WAVE-FIELD nature of our sense-experience. In the case of the THIN SKULL RULE, we “PRETEND” that the full damage from a blow to the skull is coming from the MALE-ASSERTING BLOW and we simply DROP OUT any acknowledgement of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING or GIVING IN of the SKULL. We do the same in the case of the tossing of a cigarette butt that we claim AUTHORS the FOREST FIRE without mentioning (i.e. DROPPING OUT AND OBSCURING) the reality of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT hot and dry weather conditioned ACCOMMODATING QUALITY of the environment-conditioned FOREST) and thus formulate LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION that captures this unfolding reality in one-sided MALE-ASSERTING terms.
THUS, OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION OF REALITY DEPARTS FROM OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE INFORMED UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY because our sense experience informs us of the long hot and dry summer which is TRANSFORMING THE CONTAINING SPACE in which we and the forest are included, so that a LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION based one-sidedly on the MALE-ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE is INADEQUATE for explaining WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON IN A SENSE-EXPERIENCE context and if we go ahead and use ONLY THE MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE and say that the person discarding the cigarette butt AUTHORED THE FOREST FIRE, we will be guilty of OBSCURANTISM by not mentioning THE OBVIOUS, the stuff we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are in the habit of DROPPING OUT from our LANGUAGE-based REPRESENTATIONS; i.e. the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE that ALWAYS comes together with the MALE-ASSERTING CONJGUATE in the WAVE-FIELD world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion therein.
WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE REPRESENTATIONS ARE DESIGNED TO DROP OUT THE FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE!!! THE ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ is a clear example wherein full and sole authoring credit is given to the MALE-ASSERTING AGENT and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING, which is PRIMARY, is IGNORED.
(Note that in the wave-field understanding the ‘whorl in the flow’ is EMBODIED in the flow as requires QUANTUM LOGIC (where figure and ground are only ONE) rather than BINARY LOGIC where (where figure and ground are TWO).
SYNOPSIS: DIFFERENT LANGUAGES DROP US INTO DIFFERENT ‘REALITIES’. This has been Benjamin Whorf’s hypothesis and it is also the implication in the philosophical investigations of Nietzsche and Bohm. This essay is aimed at explaining how it is that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have become trapped in a language-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY that is FRAGMENTATION based which is SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA inducing, on the scale of our WESTERN CULTURE social collective. This essay points to how the philosophical investigations of Nietzsche and Bohm show that what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS continue to understand to be ‘reality’ by way of linguistic construction is NOT in accord with our sense-experience reality, but is an INTELLECTUAL SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is the source of FRAGMENTATION, not only in our social dynamic, but also in our individual psyches.
When I say ‘our’, I am am intending ‘WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS; we who are users of the Common Average European languages. These languages are the source of psychological FRAGMENTATION by promoting ‘belief’ in such abstractions as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, which form the basis of an UNREAL intellectual BEING-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY which ‘squats’ and occupies our psychological awareness and in the process OBSCURES our sense-experience informed INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM. By elevating to primary reality status, representations in such terms as ‘the Town is growing’, which is abstract BINARY LOGIC language-based simplification of the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC ‘there is Towning in the transforming Landscape’, we construct and enter into a simplified SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION (all one-sided male-asserting abstractions) serve up a pseudo-REAL FRAGMENTATION, that “TAKES OVER” from our sense-experience awareness of INCLUSION IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka ‘the WAVE-FIELD’ aka ‘the Tao’.
This essay points out how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, because of our simple BINARY LOGIC based language architecture, are using language that PUTS US INTO and IS KEEPING US IN a “BINARY LOGIC BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY” wherein one-sided “MALE-ASSERTING” abstractions of “LOCALLY AUTHORED” GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, “TAKE OVER FROM” and “SUBSTITUTE FOR” the sense-experience grounded awareness of INCLUSION IN RELATIONAL TRANSFORMATION as constituted by the WAVE-FIELD. The result of this language-based ‘REDUCTION’ of our sense-experience affirmed inclusion in TRANSFORMATION whereby we SPEAK in terms of living within a FRAGMENTED, BEING-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY where, for example, TOWNS are treated as if they are BEING-based local explicit material entities, notionally with their own powers of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods and services, “TAKE OVER” as the dominant ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’, OBSCURING our sense-experience affirmed reality of inclusion in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD aka ‘the Tao’.
Our WESTERN CULTURE values and belief system which accepts the abstraction of “LOCAL AUTHORING’ as with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, serves to FURTHER SUPPORT the language-based construction of a FRAGMENTED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which reduces ‘TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ to abstract BEING-BASED TOWNS, notionally with “THEIR OWN” (GRAMMAR-GIVEN) powers of AUTHORING “GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods and services”. Such language-based representations of a FRAGMENTED, BEING-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY have, through INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based language, TAKEN OVER as our OPERATIVE REALITY, OBSCURING the sense-experience affirmed reality of inclusion within the WAVE-FIELD, aka the transforming relational continuum.
This essay is a reminder of how WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are trapping ourselves within a SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on the NAMING instantiated abstraction of BEING, whether ‘HUMAN BEINGS’, TOWN-BEINGS or NATION-BEINGS, giving rise to a FRAGMENTED pseudo-world of LOCAL, EXPLICIT ‘THINGS-THAT-BE’ which we animate with GRAMMAR, seemingly overcoming, with the abstraction of “BEING” the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT nature of WAVE-FIELD reality. Modern physics as well as indigenous aboriginal cultures employ language architecture that does NOT attempt EXPLICIT REPRESENTATION but orients to relations that preserve the fluid essence of WAVE-FIELD reality, In the example; ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, we see that there is NO RESORTING to any dependence on the abstraction of BEING, an abstraction that is introducing so much FRAGMENTATION based confusion within our WESTERN CULTURE social dynamic by OBSCURING our inclusion within the all-including WAVE-FIELD. BEING-based OBSCURANTISM now characterizes our WESTERN CULTURE language-animated OPERATIVE REALITY and its rising PSYCHO-SOCIAL FRAGMENTATION.
FOOTNOTE: QUANTUM LOGIC ‘heals’ the insulating empty space gap in BINARY LOGIC, between material beings, by acknowledging the natural primacy of the WAVE-FIELD which reduces ‘BEINGS’ to ‘CONDENSATIONS’, establishing the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ‘FIELD’ container as having natural precedence over the CONDENSATION based CONTENT. This is not merely a BINARY LOGIC position swap between leader and follower since the ‘FIELD’ does not simply ‘CONTAIN’ but ‘INCLUDES’ the CONDENSATION, bringing forth the QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BOTH/AND’ relation and thus doing more than a simple BINARY LOGIC inverting of ‘which prevails over which’. The ‘LESS SIMPLE’ nature of the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation exposes the shortfall in the BINARY LOGIC based concept of ‘BEING’ and elaborates on Nietzsche’s critique of the concept of ‘BEING’. ‘BEING’ is OBSCURANTIST in that it introduces simple BINARY LOGIC into representations of WAVE-FIELD phenomena where LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC is required.
QUANTUM LOGIC ‘HEALS’ the insulating empty space gap in BINARY LOGIC, between material ‘BEINGS’. Acknowledging the natural primacy of the WAVE-FIELD reduces ‘BEINGS’ to ‘CONDENSATIONS’, establishing the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ‘FIELD’ CONTAINER as having natural precedence over the CONDENSATION based CONTENT that is construed as ‘INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEING in WESTERN CULTURE language representations.
* * *
This note is a short summary of philosophical investigation findings in regard to FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE psycho-physical intercourse.
These investigations reveal that while our sense-experience reality is WAVE-FIELD aware, our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE formulates representations by BREAKING THE WAVE-FIELD experience DOWN into FEMALE (nonlocal and implicit) and MALE (local and explicit) CONJUGATES and then DISCARDING THE FEMALE CONJUGATE so that our WESTERN CULTURE “COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE” (Whorf’s classification) employs the one-sided MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE of the WAVE-FIELD ‘on its own’ (i.e. the local and explicit conjugate only, ignoring the nonlocal and implicit female conjugate). This produces language-based REPRESENTATIONS of the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING type such as “the TOWN is GROWING”
Again (for emphasis), this one-sided MALE-ASSERTING representation DROPS OUT the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE (the nonlocal implicit female conjugate). The SHORTFALL in our Common Average European language representations inspired David Bohm’s effort to develop a ‘Rheomode’ language’ which kept the full FEMALE-MALE WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE INTACT; … a language development that Bohm later discovered had already been achieved by indigenous aboriginal cultures in their language development, yielding a language capable of the full FEMALE-MALE WAVE-FIELD composite as in the example; “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.
NOTE THAT the ANDROGYNOUS topology of the WAVE-FIELD is found in basic dynamical structures in nature such as INHALING (female accommodating) and EXHALING (male-asserting). This most basic natural dynamic seems to give way in the WESTERN CULTURE to the KNOW-IT-ALL ‘BLOWHARD’ who reaches a point where further learning ceases and the one-sided flow of ‘hot air’ dominates.
A man’s wisdom is to know that all ends are momentary, that the best end must be superseded by a better. But there is a mischievous tendency in him to transfer his thought from the life to the ends, to quit his agency and rest in his acts: the tools run away with the workman, the human with the divine. – Emerson.
The key point in this note is that the ANDROGYNOUS relation in nature IS THE WAVE-FIELD REALITY, which WESTERN CULTURE reduces to the MALE-ASSERTING ONLY, CASTING OUT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE.
Our Common Average European language architecture, while DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, incorporates the ABSTRACTIONS of BEING (from NAMING) and LOCAL AUTHORING (from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR), which support FRAGMENTATION in the architectural foundation as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING’. Such representations contrast with the flow-based Rheomode, the indigenous aboriginal languages and the language architecture variants used by Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, all of which employ the full FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE WAVE-FIELD representations as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.
As Vygotsky (‘Thought and Language’) has shown, in contradicting the view of Piaget, the spontaneous/implicit and the deliberate/explicit are conjugate aspects of ONE (WAVE-FIELD) system. Piaget’s view follows the general WESTERN CULTURE VIEW which considers the LOCAL and EXPLICIT representation to be sufficient. This has become the ‘operative attitude’ in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE AND THOUGHT DYNAMICS and it is the SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION and mistaken belief in the concepts of BEING and LOCAL AUTHORING.
In other words, the UNITY of BOTH the SPONTANEOUS/IMPLICIT (FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE) AND the SCIENTIFIC/EXPLICIT (MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE) in a seamless ANDROGYNOUS UNION is the basic WAVE-FIELD nature of reality and it is only our LANGUAGE based attempt at REPRESENTATION wherein we “RESORT TO” the SPLITTING into the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and the MALE ASSERTING. Bohm’s ‘Rheomode’ and the indigenous aboriginal languages ACKNOWLEDGE the ANDROGYNOUS UNION of FEMALE AND MALE in WAVE-FIELD reality and Bohm’s WARNING on FRAGMENTATION points IMPLICITLY to PIAGET’S MISTAKE, the mistake incorporated in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IN GENERAL, of the DROP-OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE in our WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European language architecture.
Our WESTERN CULTURE PENCHANT for the SIMPLE and EXPLICIT has contributed to our persisting use of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which REDUCES WAVE-FIELD reality to a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING FRAGMENTATION based “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are problematically employing as our OPERATIVE REALITY. THIS IS THE SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION
FRAGMENTATION IS NOW VERY WIDESPREAD, NOT ONLY THROUGHOUT SOCIETY, BUT ALSO IN EACH INDIVIDUAL – David Bohm
* * *