SYNOPSIS

This note is a short summary of philosophical investigation findings in regard to FRAGMENTATION in WESTERN CULTURE psycho-physical intercourse.

These investigations reveal that while our sense-experience reality is WAVE-FIELD aware, our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE formulates representations by BREAKING THE WAVE-FIELD experience DOWN into FEMALE (nonlocal and implicit) and MALE (local and explicit) CONJUGATES and then DISCARDING THE FEMALE CONJUGATE so that our WESTERN CULTURE “COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE” (Whorf’s classification) employs the one-sided MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE of the WAVE-FIELD ‘on its own’ (i.e. the local and explicit conjugate only, ignoring the nonlocal and implicit female conjugate). This produces language-based REPRESENTATIONS of the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING type such as “the TOWN is GROWING”

Again (for emphasis), this one-sided MALE-ASSERTING representation DROPS OUT the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE (the nonlocal implicit female conjugate).  The SHORTFALL in our Common Average European language representations inspired David Bohm’s effort to develop a ‘Rheomode’ language’ which kept the full FEMALE-MALE WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE INTACT; … a language development that Bohm later discovered had already been achieved by indigenous aboriginal cultures in their language development, yielding a language capable of the full FEMALE-MALE WAVE-FIELD composite as in the example; “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.

NOTE THAT the ANDROGYNOUS topology of the WAVE-FIELD is found in basic dynamical structures in nature such as INHALING (female accommodating) and EXHALING (male-asserting).  This most basic natural dynamic seems to give way in the WESTERN CULTURE to the KNOW-IT-ALL ‘BLOWHARD’ who reaches a point where further learning ceases and the one-sided flow of ‘hot air’ dominates.

A man’s wisdom is to know that all ends are momentary, that the best end must be superseded by a better. But there is a mischievous tendency in him to transfer his thought from the life to the ends, to quit his agency and rest in his acts: the tools run away with the workman, the human with the divine.  – Emerson.

The key point in this note is that the ANDROGYNOUS relation in nature IS THE WAVE-FIELD REALITY, which WESTERN CULTURE reduces to the MALE-ASSERTING ONLY, CASTING OUT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE.

Our Common Average European language architecture, while DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, incorporates the ABSTRACTIONS of BEING (from NAMING) and LOCAL AUTHORING (from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR), which support FRAGMENTATION in the architectural foundation as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING’.  Such representations contrast with the flow-based Rheomode, the indigenous aboriginal languages and the language architecture variants used by Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, all of which employ the full FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE WAVE-FIELD representations as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

As Vygotsky (‘Thought and Language’) has shown, in contradicting the view of Piaget, the spontaneous/implicit and the deliberate/explicit are conjugate aspects of ONE (WAVE-FIELD) system.  Piaget’s view follows the general WESTERN CULTURE VIEW which considers the LOCAL and EXPLICIT representation to be sufficient.  This has become the ‘operative attitude’ in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE AND THOUGHT DYNAMICS and it is the SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION and mistaken belief in the concepts of BEING and LOCAL AUTHORING.

In other words, the UNITY of BOTH the SPONTANEOUS/IMPLICIT (FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE) AND the SCIENTIFIC/EXPLICIT (MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE) in a seamless ANDROGYNOUS UNION is the basic WAVE-FIELD nature of reality and it is only our LANGUAGE based attempt at REPRESENTATION wherein we “RESORT TO” the SPLITTING into the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and the MALE ASSERTING.  Bohm’s ‘Rheomode’ and the indigenous aboriginal languages ACKNOWLEDGE the ANDROGYNOUS UNION of FEMALE AND MALE in WAVE-FIELD reality and Bohm’s WARNING on FRAGMENTATION points IMPLICITLY to PIAGET’S MISTAKE, the mistake incorporated in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IN GENERAL, of the DROP-OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE in our WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European language architecture.

Our WESTERN CULTURE PENCHANT for the SIMPLE and EXPLICIT has contributed to our persisting use of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which REDUCES WAVE-FIELD reality to a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING FRAGMENTATION based “SUBSTITUTE REALITY” which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are problematically employing as our OPERATIVE REALITY.  THIS IS THE SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION

FRAGMENTATION IS NOW VERY WIDESPREAD, NOT ONLY THROUGHOUT SOCIETY, BUT ALSO IN EACH INDIVIDUAL  – David Bohm

* * *

(more…)