An inclusional worldview
Archive for July, 2023
HOW WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is FRAGMENTING REALITY
0July 19, 2023
by ted lumley
in APN
OVERVIEW: Western Culture Language Architecture incorporates a SIMPLICITY that distinguishes it from the LESS SIMPLE LANGUAGE of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal languages, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta languages. Instead of the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC foundations in the LANGUAGES of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, WESTERN CULTURE employs a SIMPLER LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE based on BINARY LOGIC, which, in terms of WAVE-FIELD structure, DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and EMPLOY “ONLY” the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE. For example, where Modern physics and indigenous aboriginals employ ANDROGYNOUS language structures such as ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which includes “BOTH” the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING (‘TOWNING’) “AND” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (‘in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’) .
Note that ‘TOWNING’ is a relational dynamic which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) rather than an abstract LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘THING-IN-ITSELF’ called ‘the TOWN’ as in standard WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVEOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.
NOTE ALSO that ‘TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is a QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND expression where the TOWNING and the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE are ONE THING and there is ONLY THE APPEARANCE OF TWO THINGS. As in turbulent flow, there is WHORLING in the FLOWING and it is NOT POSSIBLE to use a dip-net to scoop out the WHORLING form the FLOWING and store it in a separate TANK because the WHORLING is the APPEARANCE of the FLOWING, and is NOT a separate thing, IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT WESTERN CULTURE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGES, BECAUSE THEY GIVE A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO BINARY “EITHER/OR” LOGIC rather than QUANTUM “BOTH/AND” LOGIC, serve up a conceptualization that SPLITS APART INTO TWO SEPARATE FRAGMENTS, “THE WHORL” and “THE FLOW”, as if the “WHORL” were a separate development within the flow that is capable of INDEPENDENT MOVEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT.
THIS IS “NOT” THE CASE in the world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, but LANGUAGE can ‘DO WHAT WE WANT’ and in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATION, the COMBINATION that Nietzsche calls ‘the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR’ is used to CONCEPTUALLY LIBERATE the FORMING-in-the-FLOWING from this natural QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION and RE-CAST it in the BINARY LOGIC terms of ‘THE FORM that is MOVING THROUGH the FLOW’, in effect using LANGUAGE (the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR) to RE-RENDER the QUANTUM LOGIC FORMING IN THE FLOWING in the BINARY LOGIC terms of the ‘FORM IN THE FLOW’, whereby we are using language to CONVERT the FORMING IN THE FLOWING into the simpler BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION of the ‘FORM’ that is ‘MOVING THROUGH’ the ‘FLOW”.
This REVISION of the LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY, which REDUCES the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM BOTH/AND relation of the FORMING in the FLOWING to the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC FORM IN THE FLOW, synthetically LIBERATING the FORM and re-animating it AS IF IN ITS OWN RIGHT, by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR is the general pattern of WESTERN CULTURE language based CONCEPTUALIZATION, so that instead of understanding REALITY as a QUANTUM LOGIC FLUID DYNAMIC wherein the FIGURES in the FLOWING are APPEARANCES (in the manner of quantum logic BOTH/AND relation of WHORLINGS IN THE FLOWING, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute “REAL BEING’ to the NAMING-instantiated relational forming in the flowing, and CONFLATING this “FIRST ERROR” with the “SECOND ERROR” of GRAMMAR that imputes to “THE FIRST ERROR (the NAMING-instantiated-BEING”, … “ITS OWN” POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT. This gives is the means of ABSTRACT CONCEPTUALIZING using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is in terms of ABSTRACT LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES AND WHAT THEY DO.
This BINARY LOGIC based DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR PSEUDO-REALITY which imputes LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development by means of NAMING-instantiated LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES is the SIMPLE basis of WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing of QUOTE/UNQUOTE “REALITY”. This WESTERN CULTURE conceptualizing based on SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC rather than being based on LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and ‘runs’ with ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE, so for example, ones speaks in terms of THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN, WITHOUT MENTIONING THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS. This is CONFUSING BECAUSE of the GOEDEL’s THEOREM understanding that ALL FINITE SYSTEMS OF LOGIC ARE INCOMPLETE in which case we can speak in terms of LOGICAL TRUTHS (the TOWN is GROWING) which are AT THE SAME TIME “INCOMPLETE” (there is mention of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS).
Because WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS tend to formulate action and development efforts on a BINARY LOGIC TRUTH BASIS; e.g. “IF WE DOUBLE THE AREA OF CROP CULTIVATING, WE CAN DOUBLE OUR PRODUCTION”, this understanding which is based ONE-SIDEDLY on MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING while we CLASSIFY this as TRUTH, is INCOMPLETE and is therefore UNREAL since it fails to acknowledge the REALITY of the CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE of WILDERNESS LANDS that are an outcome that is in INNATE ASSOCIATION with THE GROWTH OF CULTIVATED CROPLAND, therefore our LOGICAL PROPOSITION in terms of the perceived DOUBLING of CROPLANDS generating a DOUBLING OF PRODUCTION, while TRUE, is INCOMPLETE since it DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which is EVER-PRESENT in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC we share inclusion in; i.e. in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, is commonly MISINTERPRETED as an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT deemed a NON-PARTICIPANT in material dynamics.
* * *
The DOUBLE WHAMMY of BINARY LOGIC and INCOMPLETENESS IN LANGUAGE
0July 15, 2023
by ted lumley
in APN
INTRODUCTION: This essay, entitled; “The DOUBLE WHAMMY of BINARY LOGIC and INCOMPLETENESS IN LANGUAGE” explores the manner in which WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE simplifies and abbreviates conceptual constructions to the point that the conceptualization of the ‘common language ground’ (serving as a ‘COMMON REALITY’) that enables group communications is no longer consistent with our sense-experience affirmed REALITY, but employs an intellectual conceptual SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on BINARY LOGIC and ‘TRUE’ but ‘INCOMPLETE’ LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS. For example, whereas INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL languages and Modern physics fashion language that speaks in QUANTUM LOGIC terms such as ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’, … WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTIONS support the MORE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based expression; the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services.
NOTE:
QUANTUM LOGIC is based on BOTH/AND logic as with WHORLING in the FLOWING where the WHORLING and the FLOWING are ONE.
BINARY LOGIC is based on the EITHER/OR logic where the WHORLING is understood to be separate from, and MOVING THROUGH the FLOWING.
Modern physics and indigenous aboriginals have the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding that HUMANINGS are included in the TRANSFORMING relational continuum, while WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have the BINARY LOGIC understanding that HUMANS are independent beings that author their own actions and behaviours while moving about within a separate and independent passive containing space.
While this here LINGUISTIC communication is in MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING terms (i.e. in terms of ‘what things do’) which is BINARY LOGIC based, this communication is INCOMPLETE in that it is DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, unlike indigenous aboriginal language (and Modern physics) where BOTH MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AND FEMALE ACCOMMMODATING/ENABLING are included as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ where we have a QUANTUM LOGIC proposition that incorporates BOTH MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as in ‘TOWNING’ and also FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING as in ‘IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.
THE FIRST ‘WHAMMY” of The DOUBLE WHAMMY of BINARY LOGIC and INCOMPLETENESS IN LANGUAGE can thus be seen as the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE which REDUCES QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC to BINARY EITHER/OR LANGUAGE. In the WAVE-FIELD structure of nature’s dynamic, we have “BOTH” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING “AND” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugates, as in the actual sense-experience affirmed physical reality on inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD.
GIVEN THAT the purpose of LANGUAGE is to come up with signal-based messaging with the capability of sharing conceptualizations of sense-experience affirmable dynamics, we must be ‘on guard’, in this case, for a DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which is the INTEGRATING agency in language based conceptual constructions. The effect of DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE is to impute FULL AND SOLE AUTHORING CAPABILITY to the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC, which gives rise to ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ (MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY) WITHOUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING AS ‘IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’)
WHY WOULD WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS JUST DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE IN OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, since it is INNATELY INCLUDED IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY?
Why Western Culture Adherents Need a NEW LANGUAGE!
0July 9, 2023
by ted lumley
in APN
WE LIVE IN A WAVE-FIELD.
WE AND ALL MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD.
WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE MAKING A HUGE MISTAKE BY BASING OUR LANGUAGE ON MATERIAL FORMS.
THE NOTION OF MATERIAL FORMS MOVING ABOUT AND INTERACTING IN EMPTY SPACE IS BINARY LOGIC BASED ABSTRACTION.
MODERN PHYSICS AND INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTAT ADHERENTS USE QUANTUM LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE aka VERB-BASED LANGUAGE WHEREIN EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, CONSISTENT WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.
AN EXAMPLE OF QUANTUM LOGIC VERSUS BINARY LOGIC IS… ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ (THIS QUANTUM LOGIC EXPRESSION IMPLIES A ‘BOTH/AND’ RELATION SINCE ‘TOWNING’ IS A FEATURE WITHIN THE ‘TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’), … VERSUS ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING AND PRODUCING GOODS’ (THIS BINARY LOGIC EXPRESSION IMPLIES AN ‘EITHER/OR’ RELATION SINCE THE ‘TOWN’ IS AN ‘INDEPENDENT’ THING-IN-ITSELF WHICH RELATES TO ITS SURROUNDINGS BY WAY OF ‘INPUTS AND OUTPUTS’ RATHER THAN QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND’ RELATIONS.
THE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY IS FRAGMENTATIVE AND USES ‘DIFFERENTIATION’ IN AN UNNATURAL PRECEDENCE OVER ‘INTEGRATION’, HENCE ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ IN PLACE OF ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ WHERE THE FIGURE AND GROUND RELATION IS UNDERSTOOD AS A QUANTUM ‘BOTH/AND’ LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM. THE INCLUDING MEDIUM AKA THE ‘GROUND’ IS THE WAVE-FIELD, THE INCLUDED FIGURE AKA THE ‘FIGURE’ IS A CONDENSATION OF THE WAVE-FIELD/GROUND AS CONSTITUTES THE QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BOTH/AND’ RELATION.
THAT IS, THE QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION IS A BOTH/AND RELATION WHEREIN THE INCLUDING MEDIUM AND THE INCLUDED ‘FIGURE’ ARE ‘SEPARATE’ ONLY IN APPEARANCE, BUT NOT IN SUBSTANCE, IN THE MANNER THAT A WHORLING IN A FLOWING APPEARS TO BE TWO THINGS; I.E. A FIGURE AND A GROUND AS IN OUR INTELLECTUAL “EITHER/OR” BINARY LOGIC BASED UNDERSTANDING, BUT IN OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE UNDERSTANDING, THE FIGURE IS INCLUDED IN THE GROUND AS IN THE QUANTUM LOGIC ‘BOTH/AND’ RELATION. (more…)
Most Recent Comments