OVERVIEW: Western Culture Language Architecture incorporates a SIMPLICITY that distinguishes it from the LESS SIMPLE LANGUAGE of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal languages, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta languages.  Instead of the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC foundations in the LANGUAGES of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, WESTERN CULTURE employs a SIMPLER LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE based on BINARY LOGIC, which, in terms of WAVE-FIELD structure, DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and EMPLOY “ONLY” the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE.  For example, where Modern physics and indigenous aboriginals employ ANDROGYNOUS language structures such as ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which includes “BOTH” the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING (‘TOWNING’) “AND” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (‘in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’) . 

Note that ‘TOWNING’ is a relational dynamic  which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) rather than an abstract LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘THING-IN-ITSELF’ called ‘the TOWN’ as in standard WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVEOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.

NOTE ALSO that ‘TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is a QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND expression where the TOWNING and the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE are ONE THING and there is ONLY THE APPEARANCE OF TWO THINGS.   As in turbulent flow, there is WHORLING in the FLOWING and it is NOT POSSIBLE to use a dip-net to scoop out the WHORLING form the FLOWING and store it in a separate TANK because the WHORLING is the APPEARANCE of the FLOWING, and is NOT a separate thing, IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT WESTERN CULTURE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGES, BECAUSE THEY GIVE A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO BINARY “EITHER/OR” LOGIC rather than QUANTUM “BOTH/AND” LOGIC, serve up a conceptualization that SPLITS APART INTO TWO SEPARATE FRAGMENTS, “THE WHORL” and “THE FLOW”, as if the “WHORL” were a separate development within the flow that is capable of INDEPENDENT MOVEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT.

THIS IS “NOT” THE CASE in the world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, but LANGUAGE can ‘DO WHAT WE WANT’ and in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATION, the COMBINATION that Nietzsche calls ‘the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR’ is used to CONCEPTUALLY LIBERATE the FORMING-in-the-FLOWING from this natural QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION and RE-CAST it in the BINARY LOGIC terms of ‘THE FORM that is MOVING THROUGH the FLOW’, in effect using LANGUAGE (the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR) to RE-RENDER the QUANTUM LOGIC FORMING IN THE FLOWING in the BINARY LOGIC terms of the ‘FORM IN THE FLOW’, whereby we are using language to CONVERT the FORMING IN THE FLOWING into the simpler BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION of the ‘FORM’ that is ‘MOVING THROUGH’ the ‘FLOW”.

This REVISION of the LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING OF REALITY, which REDUCES the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM BOTH/AND relation of the FORMING in the FLOWING to the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC FORM IN THE FLOW, synthetically LIBERATING the FORM and re-animating it AS IF IN ITS OWN RIGHT, by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR is the general pattern of WESTERN CULTURE language based CONCEPTUALIZATION, so that instead of understanding REALITY as a QUANTUM LOGIC FLUID DYNAMIC wherein the FIGURES in the FLOWING are APPEARANCES (in the manner of quantum logic BOTH/AND relation of WHORLINGS IN THE FLOWING, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute “REAL BEING’ to the NAMING-instantiated relational forming in the flowing, and CONFLATING this “FIRST ERROR” with the “SECOND ERROR” of GRAMMAR that imputes to “THE FIRST ERROR (the NAMING-instantiated-BEING”, … “ITS OWN” POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.  This gives is the means of ABSTRACT CONCEPTUALIZING using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is in terms of ABSTRACT LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES AND WHAT THEY DO.

This BINARY LOGIC based DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR PSEUDO-REALITY which imputes LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development by means of NAMING-instantiated LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES is the SIMPLE basis of WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing of QUOTE/UNQUOTE “REALITY”.  This WESTERN CULTURE conceptualizing based on SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC rather than being based on LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and ‘runs’ with ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE, so for example, ones speaks in terms of THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN, WITHOUT MENTIONING THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS.  This is CONFUSING BECAUSE of the GOEDEL’s THEOREM understanding that ALL FINITE SYSTEMS OF LOGIC ARE INCOMPLETE in which case we can speak in terms of LOGICAL TRUTHS (the TOWN is GROWING) which are AT THE SAME TIME “INCOMPLETE” (there is mention of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS).

Because WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS tend to formulate action and development efforts on a BINARY LOGIC TRUTH BASIS; e.g. “IF WE DOUBLE THE AREA OF CROP CULTIVATING, WE CAN DOUBLE OUR PRODUCTION”, this understanding which is based ONE-SIDEDLY on  MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING while we CLASSIFY this as TRUTH, is INCOMPLETE and is therefore UNREAL since it fails to acknowledge the REALITY of the CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE of WILDERNESS LANDS that are an outcome that is in INNATE ASSOCIATION with THE GROWTH OF CULTIVATED CROPLAND, therefore our LOGICAL PROPOSITION in terms of the perceived DOUBLING of CROPLANDS generating a DOUBLING OF PRODUCTION, while TRUE, is INCOMPLETE since it DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which is EVER-PRESENT in the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC we share inclusion in; i.e. in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, is commonly MISINTERPRETED as an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT deemed a NON-PARTICIPANT in material dynamics.

* * *

(more…)