BINARY LOGIC’S DOUBLE WHAMMY OF FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

 

THERE IS A LANGUAGE-BASED SOURCE of WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYSFUNCTION and it is B I N A R Y  L O G I C  which HIDES WITHIN IT, THE DOUBLE WHAMMY of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

Not only do we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS FRAGMENT ‘REALITY’ by buildling into our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE the UNREAL (ABSTRACT) EITHER/OR SPLIT of MATTER and SPACE, we COMPOUND this FRAGMENTATION with LINGUISTIC OBSCURANTISM of the ‘Thin Skull Rule’ where we ARCHITECT LANGUAGE to FALSELY give FULL and SOLE AUTHORING CREDIT for ACTION and DEVELOPMENT to a purported MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE and “NO AUTHORING CREDIT AT ALL to the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE.

When a person is punched in the head, there is an ambiguous combining of the female accommodating ‘giving in’ of the skull together with the male assertive ‘forcing’ of the punch that establishes the unfolding development. Here we see in action, in our THOUGHT and LANGUAGE, the COMBINATION of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING, a combination that is EVER-PRESENT because THE WORLD WE SHARE INCLUSION IN, IS A WAVE-FIELD according to our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, our REALITY-SIMPLIFYING BINARY LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE NOTWITHSTANDING.  Here we encounter a MISMATCH due to the FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM infused into our LANGUAGE in our efforts to SIMPLIFY our LINGISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF OUR COMPLEX SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

While the WAVE-FIELD is a CONTINUUM, our LANGUAGE FRAGMENTS IT WITH BINARY LOGIC into MATTER and SPACE.

While the WAVE-FIELD is ANDROGYNOUS and embodies BOTH a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING together with a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, our WESTERN CULTURE SCHEME OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION “NOT ONLY” DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING FLUIDITY (here comes the FRAGMENTATION) BUT ALSO PUTS IN ITS PLACE AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT WHICH IS OBSCURANTISM since the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SEAMLESSLY OBSCURES ALL EVIDENCE of the CONTINUING SENSE-EXPERIENCE EXISTENCE of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE; i.e. the WAVE-FIELD NATURE OF REALITY IS “NOT GOING AWAY” just because the WORDS FOR SYMBOLIZING the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE ARE “GOING AWAY”.

 

“FRAGMENTATION” and “OBSCURANTISM” are reatures within the CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of LINGUISTIC PSEUDO-REALITY  “BUT ALSO”.  Our SENSES continue to bring us the full, unfragmented, unobscured EXPERIENCE regardless of our INTELLECTUAL GAME-PLAYING on the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING FRONT wherein we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are dabbling in “FRAGMENTATION” and “OBSCURANTISM” so as to “SIMPLIFY THE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION OF REALITY” thus PUTTING OUR SIMPIFIED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION OF REALITY “AT ODDS” WITH OUR “SENSE-EXPERIENCING OF REALITY” by INFUSING “FRAGMENTATION” and “OBSCURANTISM” into the “SIMPLIFED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION OF REALITY”, for example when we say things like “THERE ARE MANY PEOPLE IN THE TOWN” (FRAGMENTATION) when thereality is the transforming relatoinal continuum where “THERE IS PEOPLING IN THE TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”

The PEOPLING IN THE TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is all according to our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION THEREIN, while the FRAGMENTATION into a notional MULTIPLICITY OF ‘INDEPENDENT HUMAN BEINGS’ is ABSTRACT LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION OF REALITY WHICH IS SIMPLIFIED INFERENCE MEANT TO SERVE AS A SIGNALLING SYSTEM TO SHARE SYMBOLS that can put people on MORE OR LESS THE SAME PAGE for the purpose of coordination within the transforming relational continuum.  If, thanks to our simplifying language, a group of us believe we are working together to ‘CONSTRUCT A TOWN’, this is BALONEY but it is USEFUL BALONEY with respect to being a SILLY ABSTRACT CONCEPTUALIZATION that nevertheless helps us “COORDINATE ACTIONS” which are, MEANWHILE, NOT TO DO WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF A TOWN (that is pure ABSTRACTION) but to continuing variations within the context of our CO-INCLUSION in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.   When we ‘put it to language’ we get USEFUL BALONEY such as ‘WE ARE EXPANDING THE TOWN BY ADDING MORE NEW STREETS AND NEW AVENUES and shifting the signs that say “ENTERING PLEASANTVILLE” and “LEAVING PELEASANTVILLE” in keeping with the GROWTH of PLEASANTVILLE.

OF COURSE, “GROWTH” is ABSTRACTION that, once we UTTER IT within our ABSTRACT WORD COCKTAILS, we have INFUSED FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM in our PSYCHE, the FRAGMENTATION associated with the GROWTH of the TOWN notionally WITHIN an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT, and OBSCURANTISM of FAILING TO MENTION THE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS, a reality that exposes the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY NONSENSE imputed by the word “GROWTH”.  Because the world of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE is a WAVE-FIELD WORLD; i.e. a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka an ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, WE CANNOT (without losing our PSYCHOLOGICAL GROUNDING in sense-experience reality) DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

That is, IN SPITE OF A LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION THAT INCLUDES the ABSTRACT NOTION OF ‘GROWTH’ as in ‘the CHILD IS GROWING’ or ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’, our sense-experience DOESN’T BUY THE PURPORTED VALIDITY OF THIS WORD-CONCEPT ‘GROWTH’ because our SENSE-EXPERIENCE informsus that there can be NO GROWTH of the TOWN or the CHILD without CONJUGATE SHRINKING of the CONTAINING LANDSCAPE, and in fact this GROWING and CONJUGATE SHRINKING are NOT TWO LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS but, as our PRE-LINGUAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE INFORMS US, ONE THING which we can call TRANSFORMATION, or more appropriately, ‘THE TRANSFORMING’ since it is going on EVERYWHERE AT THE SAME TIME which is the nature of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD in which WE and ALL MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS so that FIGURES and GROUND are ONLY ONE and so LINGUISTIC FRAGMENTATION INTO IS NOT REAL; i.e. NOT SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE and it is OBSCURANTIST because so long as we have it in our minds the BINARY LOGIC FRAGMENTATION of ‘the TOWN THAT IS GROWING’, we CANNOT, AT THE SAME TIME, COMPREHEND THE LESS SIMPLE SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED QUANTUM (BOTH/AND) LOGIC REALITY WHEREIN “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” .

LET’S FACE IT, … WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE SOME MAJOR ISSUES WITH THE SIGNIFICANT ‘DISCONNECT’ BETWEEN our LINGUISTIC BINARY LOGIC BASED CONCEPTUALIZATIONS and our SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY.  For example, in the former we have the more simple BINARY LOGIC ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ (as if within an absolute empty and infinite space) in the latter, which is meant to be addressing the same thing, we have the LESS SIMPLE “There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” wherein EVERYTHING IS IN AN UNBOUNDED FLOWING CONTINUUM so that relational forms are APPEARANCES within the all-including TRANSFORMING.   It is only WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING THAT conjures up the APPEARANCE of LOCAL, EXPLICIT material forms as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, that being INTELLECTUAL LINGUAGE BASED ABSTRACTION, is CONCEPTUALIZING that is BEYOND THE NATURAL LIMITS OF SENSE-EXPERIENGE INFORMED DEVELOPMENTS.

For example, ‘The GROWTH OF A TOWN’ is LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is BEYOND THE NATURAL LIMITS OF SENSE-EXPERIENCE INFORMED DEVELOPMENTS since THERE IS NO ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ‘GROWING’ ON ITS OWN, there can only be GROWING within the conjugate relation with SHRINKING, these two conjugates being a simple way of conveying the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD within which MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS (the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC RELATION).

BINARY LOGIC IS ABSTRACTION BASED LOGIC WHEREIN THE PROPOSITIONS ARE ALWAYS, NECESSARILY, “INCOMPLETE”.

QUANTUM LOGIC, which requires a LESS SIMPLE, more NUANCED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING as can capture BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM “AVOIDS” THE PROBLEMS of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM (i.e. ‘fragmentation’ as in splitting OUT ‘MAPS’ (fragment based conceptualizations) of SO-CALLED ‘TOWNS’ (the IMAGINARY ENVELOPE of gathering-scattering resonance features) which are LOCAL and EXPLICIT and are SUBSTITUTED for the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT gathering-scattering patterns.  By NAMING the standing form resonance features they are imputedly given LOGAL INDEPENDENT BEING status and by inventing GRAMMAR, it is possible to develop a system of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING which now has a STABLE (LOCAL, EXPLICIT, PERSISTING) BASE and all is thanks to the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR where the LOCAL AUTHORING AGENCY is shifted, notionally, from the CLUSTERING which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT to the PERSISTING LOCAL ENVELOPE which gives the APPEARANCE of a LOCAL THING that GROWS and SHRINKS and SHIFTS, which we are calling ‘the CLUSTER’, and are pretending that is a LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF with ITS OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.

 

USING THIS “DOUBLE ERROR” of NAMING and GRAMMAR, which we PASTE LIKE LABELS over resonance features, we DEVELOP LANGUAGE that GIVES INDEPENDENT LIFE (notionally) TO LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORMS which are, in our sense-experience reality, RESONANCE FEATURES “OF THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT RELATIONAL CONTINUUM'”; i.e. EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX HERE and there is only THE APPEARANCE of LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORMS based on RESONANCE PHENOMENA.

This is how LANGUAGE IS CREATED that SUBSTITUTES for the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT RESONANCE FEATURES, BASED ON ‘APPEARANCES”; i.e. RESONANCES WITHIN THE FLOW-CONTINUUM THAT APPEAR TO BE what we now think of as “LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL ENTITIES. notionally with “THEIR OWN” GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.

 

This is an ABSTRACT LANGUAGE-BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION, A ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ that “could have been” a USEFUL TOOL, were it not for what has been happening;

A man’s wisdom is to know that all ends are momentary, that the best end must be superseded by a better. But there is a mischievous tendency in him to transfer his thought from the life to the ends, to quit his agency and rest in his acts: the tools run away with the workman, the human with the divine.  —Ralph Waldo Emerson

While there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and that TOWN as it is in any particular moment is continually being superseded by something new, perhaps better, but certainly different, and just as there is TOWNING in the TRANFORMING LANDSCAPE, so also is there HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, … and it would be a good idea to do like the indigenous aboriginals and continually remind ourselves that we are a strand in the overall transforming web-of-life thus a product of our unique situationally inclusion therein, but the TOOL OF LANGUAGE lets us TALK OF OURSELVES as if we were INDEPENDENT BEINGS notionally with actions and developments deriving from INTERNAL ‘ORGANS’ such as ‘LUNGS’ and “HEART’ and ‘CIRCULATION SYSTEM’ and other MACHINES-OPERATING-IN-EMPTY-SPACE LIKE ANALOGIES which have become stubbornly persisting LANGUAGE-SUPPORTED DELUSIONS.  It is from this LANGUAGE BASED DELUSION that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS construct our FRAGMENTED, OBSCURANTIST LINGUISTIC PSEUDO-REALITY wherein we are IN DENIAL of our natural fully-integrated presenece as CONDENSATIONS of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

The FRAGMENTATION comes with the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and the OBSCURANTISM comes with the ‘COVER-UP’ of hiding the REMOVAL of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE by imposing the notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

We can this COMBINATION of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM occurring in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING as associates with the RESONANCE features of the GATHERING and SCATTERING of ANTS stimulated by a DROP OF HONEY.  This RESONANCE phenomenon is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (purely relational and not deliberately planned and executed) but our WESTERN CULTURE TENDENCY perhaps because of having some experience with DELIBERATE ORGANIZING.  The SIMPLICITY of some LANGUAGE PATTERNS relative to others, or perhaps it is EGO, invites to use language to CONCEPTUALIZE what is going on with the CLUSTERING in terms of the FORMATION OF A CLUSTER.  This world CLUSTER is, in this example, out of the BLUE and seems to associate the opportunity to impose the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR which then enables us to form such abstractions as ‘the CLUSTER IS GROWING’.  I say ‘abstractions’ since we have nothing coming from our sense-experience that suggests that what we are referring to as ‘the CLUSTER’ is some kind of SENTIENT BEING that has CONSCIOUSNESS OF ITS OWN and is deciding to GROW ITSELF as in ‘the CLUSTER IS GROWING’ (and shifting towards the stream, or DISTRIBUTING THE HONEY, all of these language constructs implying an INTELLIGENCE within THE CLUSTER that is directing its GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of FORMS and MOVEMENTS.

 

HAVING TAKEN THE INTELLIGENCE OUT OF THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT (WAVE-FIELD), we have instead resituated ‘the SEAT OF CONSCIOUSNESS, INTELLIGENCE AND BEHAVIOURAL INTENT within the RESONANCE FEATURE although this can only be based on APPEARANCE and our own VOYEUR IMAGININGS.

This shift of the INTELLIGENCE from THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD to particular LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORMS separated by UNINTELLIGENT EMPTY SPACE is a WESTERN CULTURE REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING CHOICE which is FRAGMENTATIVE and OBSCURANTIST.  It is FRAGMENTATIVE in that, as with the example of ants in a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) clustering phenomenon, we inject into our LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING, the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to ‘CREATE’ (in our language-stimulated psyche) the ABSTRACTION of a LOCAL AUTHOR with its own POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.  Now we have ‘the CLUSTER’ which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and notionally the seat of INTELLIGENT BEHAVIOUR in what is now “A CLUSTER”, a notional “LOCAL THING-ITSELF’, notionally with ITS OWN INTERNAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.

QUESTIONS:

Whatver happened to the RESONANCE FEATURE within the ALL-INCLUDING NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM?

If we check over our shoulder, we see that the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, TAOIST/BUDDHIST AND ADVAITA VEDANTA CULTURES STILL HAVE THIS UNDERSTANDING OF THE PRESENCE OF A NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT ALL-PERVADING CONSCIOUSNESS WHICH IS LOCALLY POPULATED WITH MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS WHICH ARE “NOT” INDEPENDENT OF THE NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT, ALL-PERVADING WAVE-FIELD OR ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM OR ‘FIELD OF CONSCIOIUSNESS’.

In this MODERN PHYSICS consistent understanding of NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT FIELD OF CONSCIOUSNESS, while there is CLUSTERING “THAT BELONGS TO THE NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT ENERGY-FLOW FIELD”, there are NO INDEPENDENT CLUSTERS notionally with their own LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT, THAT BEING an artefact of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.

The POLITICS that come with these two different models or reality, the QUANTUM LOGIC MODEL understanding that all things are related as with material condensations of an all-including WAVE-FIELD and the other understanding that all things are INDEPENDENT FRAGMENTS isolated by being in an infinite empty space and OBSCURANTIST in that THEY PRETEND TO BE THE MASTERS OF THEIR OWN ACTIONS, as they would have to be if the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD REALLY WAS AN EMPTY SPACE, which it clearly is NOT.  And in admitting that the HUMANINGS IN THE TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD are ‘STRANDS IN AN INTEGRATED WEB-OF-LIFE’, as acknowledged by the Systems Sciences in the terms that we are living “…in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence…” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences

This cannot be interpreted in terms of a need to become SUPER-CONSCIOUS of ALL OUR RELATIONS, because THAT IS WHO WE ARE and we don’t have to consciously think about it so that we can GET IN STEP WITH EVERYTHING, … it implies, that, if we can can ‘get in touch with it’, our ‘self’ ALREADY IS “ONE WITH EVERYTHING”

In Taoism, attaining a state of emptiness is viewed as a state of stillness and placidity which is the “mirror of the universe” and the “pure mind”.  The Tao Te Ching claims that emptiness is related to the “Tao, the Great Principle , the Creator and Sustainer of everything in the universe”. 

So, ONCE WE IMPOSE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING, we WITHDRAW SUPPORT from the understanding that CONSCIOUS INTELLIGENCE IS INNATE IN THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.

Clearly, there is an understanding waiting for us wherein we are HUMANINGS in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM wherein everyone is related, including those in HAMAS  and those in the Kibbutz

in which case the remedy for violent relational dissonance is restoring relational harmony.  The BINARY LOGIC of PURIFICATION by way of ELIMINATING the BAD DEVILISH BEINGS and become submissive to the GOOD ANGELIC BEINGS doesn’t work, … not BECAUSE there is an ENDLESS SUPPLY OF EVIL BEINGS but because there are no such things as BEINGS, there are only relational forms in the transforming relational continuum and when relations become violent, it is the RELATIONS that are the problem we must work on and this problem is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as are the relational influences in the WAVE-FIELD.

When we find ourselves focusing on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, it’s time to recall the reality that CLUSTERS are only ‘APPEARANCES’.  If we see ‘the CLUSTER GROWING’, whether it is the HAMAS cluster or the IRGUN cluster, it is only “APPEARANCE” while the reality is the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

 * * * 

 

 

 

While David Bohm has done a great job EXPOSING THE FRAGMENTATION that is built into WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE and  summarizes THE DAMAGE BEING DONE BY FRAGMENTATION in the two paragraphs cited here from “Wholeness and the Implicate Order’, and while Bohm explains how FRAGMENTATION derives from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, Bohm does not mention that there is an inter-relating DOUBLE-DOUBLE ERROR in WESTERN CULTURE “BINARY LOGIC” .

 

The FIRST of the DOUBLE ERRORS is FRAGMENTATION (by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which (1a) uses NAMING to impute BEING, and (2a) uses GRAMMAR of imply powers of LOCAL AUTHORING, and the SECOND of the DOUBLE ERRORS being OBSCURANTISM (by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of (1b) DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, and (2b) SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT for the DROPPED OUT FEMALE CONJUGATE.

While I have made plenty of mention in my notes, of the ERROR of FRAGMENTATION, as was so well documented by Bohm, I spent less time on the ERROR of OBSCURANTISM, but BINARY LOGIC INCLUDES BOTH OF THESE ERRORS while QUANTUM LOGIC INCLUDES NEITHER.  For example;

EXAMPLE of FRAGMENTATION: Fragmentation comes with the abstraction of LOCAL AUTHORING as in the TOWNS are GROWING.  In this LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING, each TOWN is a new centre of growth which means that there are many disconnected TOWNS (or COUNTRIES etc.) and this FRAGMENATION derives from the use of the abstraction of NAMING.  By contrast, in a VERB based language such as the indigenous aboriginal languages and the language usage in Zen Buddhism etc, we could have said ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein everyhing is included in a relational flux aka TRANSFORMATION.

 

EXAMPLE of FRAGMENTATION.

 

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

 

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

 

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.

 

* * *

OK, Bohm describes FRAGMENTATION without mentioning BINARY LOGIC and why should he?  We commonly use BINARY LOGIC in our language based conceptualizing of things, in this case FRAGMENTATION which is the home ground of BINARY LOGIC usage, but I NEED TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN “SIMPLE” BINARY LOGIC and “LESS SIMPLE” QUANTUM LOGIC not only because I want to directly discuss their difference, but of the problem of OBSCURANTISM which I am trying to explain because of its significance in regard to how our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE CONCEPTUALIZING “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.  For example, Goedel’s Theorem tells us that ALL SYSTEMS OF BINARY LOGIC are INCOMPLETE which gives us an EXPOSURE TO CONFUSION since come of our LOGIC “IS MORE COMPLETE THAN OTHERS’ and yet we give both the STAMP OF APPROVAL OF BEING ‘TRUE’ even when we may be studying the same phenomenon so that TWO LOGICIANS may be ARGUING over the QUALITY of their RESPECTIVE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS, BOTH of which are TRUE but one of which is MORE SIMPLE than that other.

This can lead to confusion since our INTUITION may inform us that even though two logical propositions are TRUE, one may seem ‘more complete’.

First True BINARY LOGIC Proposition: ‘the TOWN is GROWING’.

Second True BINARY LOGIC Proposition: ‘the TOWN is GROWING and the WILDERNESS is SHRINKING’.

QUANTUM LOGIC LESS SIMPLE PROPOSITION: there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

There is a weakness in that our everyday WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE employs a BINARY LOGIC structure because it is SIMPLER than QUANTUM LOGIC, but the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC is exposed to both FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM;

 

 

 

The Judaic/Christian/Islamic BINARY LOGIC FIASCO

 

JEWS, CHRISTIANS and MUSLIMS have a LANGUAGE supported tendency to ‘be coming from’ a COMMON ‘REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING PRACTICE’ which is BINARY LOGIC BASED. 

 

The BINARY LOGIC based REALITY with its BELIEF in a world constituted by MATERIAL FORMS in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE has been BUILT INTO the differing languages used by these groups, and that is where there is overall consistency in their BINARY LOGIC based REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION, … which is very different from the QUANTUM LOGIC based REALITY of indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists, Advaita Vedanta adherents, … and, … MODERN PHYSICS.

 

The QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY is based on ‘mitakuye oyasin’, … everything is related, in the manner of CONDENSATIONS in the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD aka TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  This is where QUANTUM LOGIC ‘comes from’; i.e. it ‘comes from’ the BOTH/AND RELATION of material CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD and the WAVE-FIELD, … which is analogous to the WHORLING in the FLOWING of a transforming watercourse.  Note that the WHORLING and the FLOWING are one and the same; i.e. we could not get a fishing net and LIFT OUT THE WHORLING because the WHORLING is how the FLOWING is APPEARING which means it is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (RELATIONAL), so the next time we fall into the trap of using ‘the WHORL in a NAMING and GRAMMAR DOUBLE ERROR COMBINATION such as ‘the WHORLING is MOVING ACROSS THE TURBULENT RIVER FLOW, … WE NEED TO CORRECT THIS ‘DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’ because the WHORLING is the “APPEARANCE” OF THE FLOWING.

 

In other words, “THE WHORLING” is NOT SOMETHING WE COULD GATHER UP IN A FISHING NET, because it is simply how FLOWING is APPEARING.   Thus, we are wrong if we LOCAL THING-IT-ITSELF BEING with LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT to ‘the WHORLING’.  As MODERN PHYSICS has affirmed and as was already the understanding built into indigenous aboriginal linguistic conceptualization and understanding, THE WHORLING AND THE FLOWING ARE ONLY ONE AND NOT TWO.

 

IN GENERAL THE WORLD OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE IS QUANTUM LOGIC BASED AND NOT BINARY LOGIC BASED, as understood in MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoists/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY.

(more…)