Archive for June, 2024

“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm

What this means is that“WE ARE ALL RELATED” (mitakuye oyasin)  as with the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM where material “CONDENSATIONS -OF-THE-MEDIUM”, like WHORLINGS in the FLOWING, while having a DISTINGUISHING APPEARANCE, are INCLUDED FEATURES OF THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

The indigenous aboriginal culture understands this QUANTUM LOGIC pattern in NATURE wherein ALL THINGS ARE RELATED, where there is no such thing as LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, as is basic in the BINARY LOGIC based linguistic conceptualizings of WESTERN CULTURE.  In the aboriginal culture, the violent act is understood as having been cultivated in the relational social matrix so that the violent PERSON is seen as the CONDUIT through whom the tensions brewed in the social collective are vented.  RESTORATIVE JUSTICE by means of the HEALING CIRCLE is the natural response to outbursts of violence rather than scapegoating the CONDUIT through which community-brewed tensions are vented.

BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC IS TOO SIMPLE A BASE FOR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC REALITY IN THAT BINARY LOGIC REQUIRES EMPTY SPACE AS ‘INSULATOR’ TO SUPPORT THE ABSTRACTION OF SEPARATE OBJECTS which WESTERN CULTURE makes out to be the LOCAL AUTHORS of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS (using the device of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR).  This is in marked contrast to the QUANTUM PHYSICS and indigenous aboriginal ‘relational web-of-life’ understanding of actions and developments being of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational origin) and only LOCAL and EXPLICIT in APPEARANCE in the manner that SOLAR IRRADIANCE FIELDS which are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT are the primary source of LOCAL and EXPLICIT high pressure and low pressure circulations in the oceans and atmosphere,’

WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing, in spite of our sense-experience affirming that everything is in flux, employs the ‘DOUBLE ERROR” combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘push’ to the high pressure and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ‘pull’  to the low pressure, thus providing a pseudo-explanation of these CONJUGATE WAVE-FIELD COMPONENTS in LOCAL, EXPLICIT terms.   This tactic may be popularly affirmed by the ‘petitio principii of ‘does this low pressure suck?’ … and… ‘does this high pressure push’?   The petitio pincipii error akin to Nietzsche’s example of ‘lightning flashes’ where the lightning IS THE flashing.  Likewise, the low pressure IS THE sucking and the high pressure IS THE pushing.  Meanwhile, the DOUBLE  ERROR construct WRONGLY implies LOCAL AUTHORING which is a a work-around for the problem faced by linguistic conceptualizing challenge associated with capturing the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

BINARY LOGIC itself is a simplifying ‘ruse’ that when applied to explain the WAVE-FIELD phenomena DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate which makes it incapable of capturing the QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD relation which is comprised of the conjugate relation of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING together with FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING.   BINARY LOGIC’S “EITHER/OR” linguistic conceptualization CAN ONLY ‘HANDLE’ the LOCAL and EXPLICIT such as “IS THE TOWN GROWING?”.   There is a problem here in that whether the reality and/or the answer is EITHER yes OR no, … this makes no mention of the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS and thus no mention of the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE.  This suggests that the question “IS THE TOWN GROWING” is NOT about our sense-experience reality since what is going on according to our sense-experience reality is that ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

Some may ARGUE that the simple BINARY LOGIC proposition (IS THE TOWN GROWING) and response is adequate but to an indigenous aboriginal who is likely to be sensitive to, and accustomed to speaking in the flow-based language terms, it is important NOT TO CONCEAL the reality that there is CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS together with GROWING OF THE TOWN.   The CONSTRUCTION OF THE TOWN PART is only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate and this is standard in WESTERN CULTURE to DROP OUT mention of the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and this has been called the DEA ABSCONDITA (GODDESS IN HIDING) because the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate is the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM while the material CONDENSATION such as ‘the TOWN that is GROWING’ … IS NOT SOMETHING REAL, … IT IS ONLY APPEARANCE as is the case with all CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD.  What is REAL is the CONTINUALLY TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.

BINARY LOGIC is something we apply to “THE TOWN” as in “THE TOWN IS EITHER LARGER THIS SUMMER THAN LAST SUMMER, or NOT”.   SUCH A QUESTION DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE SO THAT IN USING BINARY LOGIC, WE ARE NOT ‘PLAYING WITH A FULL DECK’.  We have the issue of the DEA ABSCONDITA (GODDESS IN HIDING).

WORSE THAN THIS!  BY DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE we are DROPPING OUT THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD and PRETENDING THAT THE MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD, WHICH ARE ‘APPEARANCE’ only (THE WAVE-FIELD IS NON-VISIBLE) ARE THE OPERATIVE REALITY. 

The “TOWN that is GROWING “is a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that suggests the presence of a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF, notionall with ITS OWN POWERS of AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.  That is the WESTERN CULTURE view.   In the indigenous aboriginal view as also the QUANTUM LOGIC view, what is going on is that we all share inclusion in the transforming relational continuum and in this case there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein everyting is in flux and there are no LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES such as ‘TOWNS’ that ‘GROW’ and ‘DEVELOP’ and ‘PRODUCE GOODS’; these are the products of DIFFERENTIATING the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).

The NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT provides CONTEXT for the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONTENT, but there is a problem here when BINARY LOGIC is employed since BINARY LOGIC is ONLY CAPABLE OF ADDRESSING THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT as in MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES SITUATED IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which means OUT OF THE CONTEXT OF THE CONJUGATE RELATION WITH THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE

THUS, THE POINT IS THAT BINARY LOGIC ACTS AS A FILTER THAT REMOVES LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING’S ACCESS TO THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE WHICH MEANS THAT BINARY LOGIC REMOVES ACCESS TO WAVE-FIELD BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION (BINARY LOGIC GIVES ACCESS ONLY TO MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING). 

BECAUSE LINGUISTIC DISCOURSE CONSTRAINED BY BINARY LOGIC “DROPS OUT” THE CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, THERE WILL BE DROP OUT OF THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT which is the CONTEXTUAL CONTAINER that ENRICHES understanding of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘CONTENT”.

AS WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, WE HAVE ACCESS TO SENSE-EXPERIENCE GROUNDING IN OUR UNDERSTANDING, but for those of us who place UNBALANCED DEPENDENCE on BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, there is NO SUPPORTING CONTEXTUAL GROUNDING and the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, which, on its own (without CONTEXTUAL ENRICHMENT from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT), sources FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM in WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS. 

* * *AUTHOR’S NOTE:  The way I think of the above is that BINARY LOGIC, by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE that comes with QUANTUM LOGIC, brings in, instead, an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE which gives a FREE TICKET to MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DOMINANCE which means that linguistic conceptualizing (expressibility of thought and language) is LIMITED to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (what the TOWN is doing) while the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (transforming landscape influence) is DISABLED, but it is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE that enriches the understanding constrained by the limited reach of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT that is generated by the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate.* * *

* * * * * * * * *

The WESTERN CULTURE Hijacking of Quantum Logic by Binary Logic is the reason why we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are NOT on the ‘same page’ as indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, all of whom are, as David Point pointed out, in accord with QUANTUM PHYSICS.

WESTERN CULTURE is in serious trouble that is manifesting in FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTIST DROP-OUT built into our linguistic conceptualizing scheme.  The FRAGMENTATION is coming from the use of NAMING to invent LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING/S and the OBSCURANTISM is coming from the use of GRAMMAR to impute one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING agency (e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’) which DROPS OUT the WAVE-FIELD conjugate of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING as in ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX as is the basic nature of the WAVE-FIELD.  WESTERN CULTURE’s use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCTING GOODS’ is linguistic conceptualizing that implies the EXISTENCE of a MATERIAL BEING (‘the TOWN’) that has its own powers of GROWING).

The REALITY affirmed by our sense-experience is that ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ … where everything is in flux.   There can be no ‘TOWN THAT IS GROWING’ without a CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, with both of these conjugates being aspects of the ONGOING, and ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is otherwise known the WAVE-FIELD.   The MATERIAL FIGURE or “TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” is in a “QUANTUM BOTH/AND RELATION” where “THE TOWNING” is a CONDENSATION of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is “BOTH” its “LOCAL, EXPLICIT SELF”, … “AND”, … at the same time, the ALL-INCLUDING, NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD.   This QUANTUM LOGIC “BOTH”/”AND” RELATION describes a relation such as a WHORLING in a FLOWING where there in only ONE dynamic entitity, the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD BUT THERE IS THE APPEARANCE of TWO; i.e. the WHORLING and the FLOWING which is just ONE since WHORLING is part of the APPEARANCE of FLOWING and we cannot ‘scoop out a WHORLING’ in a net and put it in a separate ‘holding tank’ because “IT” (the WHORLING) is APPEARANCE and is NOT a THING THAT EXISTS.

I am proceeding ‘carefully’ here as I compose my linguistic conceptualizations because what I am sharing here is a TRICKY MATTER that requires from us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS an OPEN MIND (so as not to be ‘held captive’ by our WESTERN CULTURE common linguistic conceptualizations that are erroneous but which we HABITUALLY employ on a routine basis in spite of their being ‘infected’ with errors.

The KEY POINT is that while our sense-experience is of INCLUSION IN THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is a WAVE-FIELD dynamic that requires QUANTUM LOGIC expression, our intellectual modeling and our simple BEING-based linguistic conceptualizations are SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based while QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE and requires a less simple lingiustic conceptualizing scheme.   In particular, in the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of MODERN PHYSICS, which accords with the indigenous aboriginal linguistic conceptualizing scheme, EVERYTHING IS RELATED in the manner of CONDENSATIONS of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in the PLENUM wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.  This is why researchers such as Zen scholar Alan Watts recommends that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “DROP” our BEING-BASED LANGUAGE and adopt a FLOW-BASED (relational) LANGUAGE.

(more…)