Archive for October, 2024

TRUST is the ENABLER of WESTERN CULTURE OBSCURANTISM and FRAGMENTATION

0

AUTHOR’S GUIDE to Reading this TWO-PART ESSAY

This ESSAY takes us through THE FOLLOWING POINT made by Nietzsche which is largely IGNORED in our standard WESTERN CULTURE interpreting of written material.

Although all concepts are metaphors invented by humans (created by common agreement to facilitate ease of communication), writes Nietzsche, human beings forget this fact after inventing them, and come to believe that they are “true” and do correspond to reality.

For example, we say ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’, and in so doing we emphasize ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate aspect AND DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate ‘SHRINKING of WILDERNESS’, in which case ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ does NOT refer to REALITY because the REALITY OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE is that the LANDSCAPE is TRANSFORMING which is the conjugate combination of PEAK (the TOWN is GROWING) and TROUGH (the WILDERNESS IS SHRINKING) which are dual aspects of the one WAVE-FIELD phenomenon.

[**NOTA BENE”  If we put on our LANGUAGE ARCHITECT HATS, we can see that had we chosen, as indigenous aboriginals did chose, as well as Modern physics, to give a foundational role to FLOW instead of to BEING, we would have retained in combined form the CONTAINER (SPACE) and CONTENT (MATTER).  If we had followed that path, as the indigenous aboriginals did, our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME would instead have avoided the BINARY LOGIC SPLIT into MATTER and SPACE and our understanding would be that EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX in which case what had appeared as EMPTY SPACE was instead an ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM and what had appeared as LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL objects was, INSTEAD, like WHORLINGS in FLOWING, ‘APPEARANCE’ since the WHORLING is BOTH itself and the FLOWING it is included in which means that the foundational structure of reality is a QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM based foundational structure.]

Had we taken that QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC-OF-THE-INCLUDING-MEDIUM linguistic conceptualizing approach, our linguistic conceptualizings would be more like “in the flowing, transforming PLENUM (the containing wave-field), there are WHORLINGS or CONDENSATIONS”, meaning that what APPEAR to be material forms (the whorlings) in the FLOWING PLENUM are instead the APPEARANCE of the PLENUM.  Thus the understanding is, for example, that “THERE ARE HUMANINGS and other CONDENSATIONS IN THE (nonvisible, nonlocal, implicit) PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD and EVERYTHING IS RELATED since all visible forms are CONDENSATION of the all-including energy-charged PLENUM, …

“I, you, he, she, we.  In the garden of mystic lovers, these are not true distinctions.” ― Mawlana Jalal-al-Din Rumi

The Modern physics undestanding is that material forms are condensations of the all-including energy-charged PLENUM.  That is, “in the FLOWING, TRANSFORMING PLENUM (the CONTAINING WAVE-FIELD), we and all things are WHORLINGS or CONDENSATIONS (CONTENTS) which are INTERRELATED and INTERDEPENDENT as is the understanding in a FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, and it is only when one uses a BEING and GRAMMAR (double error) based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME as we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS DO, that the simplifying metaphors we are obliged to use in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING (when we assume a foundational role for BEING) make use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR structure; e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’.

What Nietzsche is saying is that the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION— “THE TOWN IS GROWING” — is a SIMPLIFYING METAPHOR that ALLUDES TO a LESS SIMPLE sense-experience REALITY, that of our INCLUSION in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM wherein the WILDERNESS IS SHRINKING TOGETHER WITH THE TOWN GROWING; i.e. there are NOT TWO THINGS but ONLY ONE;i.e. the TRANSFORMING landscape within which there is TOWNING.

So Nietzsche’s point is that we come to think of PROPOSITIONS such as ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ not only as TRUE, which does apply but is limited by being INCOMPLETE as affirmed by Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of ALL FINITE PROPOSITIONS OF LOGIC.  Here we can see that the LOGICAL TRUTH must not be mistaken for REALITY as is a COMMON ERROR in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  “The TOWN is GROWING” is only APPEARANCE or in Schreodinger’s language “Schaumkommen”, and IS NOT “REALITY” (REALITY includes conjugate SHRINKING of WILDERNESS).

The REALITY is as captured in indigenous aboriginal flow-based languages and in Bohm’s Modern physics Rheomode language; i.e. the REALITY is that EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX which captures the understanding that what is going on is TRANSFORMATION while the expression “the TOWN is GROWING” is a METAPHOR (“a figure of speech in which an expression is used to refer to something that it does not literally denote in order to suggest a similarity”)

This example, ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, embodies an error, as is common in WESTERN CULTURE use of METAPHORS in INGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING. The ERROR is that the REALITY, which is NOT that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ but instead that ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, has both a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING aspect (there is TOWNING), and a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING aspect (… “IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”) which exposes the “INCOMPLETENESS” of ALL (finite) LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS such as ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ which is INCOMPLETE in stating that ‘the TOWN is GROWING” since if the TOWN is GROWING, the WILDERNESS must be CONJUGATELY SHRINKING, unless the TOWN were situated in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE wherein TOWNS are seen as LOCAL and EXPLICIT and INDEPENDENT as the notional EMPTY SPACE HAS US IMAGINE THINGS WITHIN IT.  THIS ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “ONLY” LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING wherein “THE TOWN IS GROWING” which is MISSING its conjugate FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, is NOT REAL.

… all concepts are metaphors invented by humans (created by common agreement to facilitate ease of communication) …  human beings forget this fact after inventing them, and come to believe that they are “true” and do correspond to reality.

“THE TOWN IS GROWING” does NOT correspond with reality since we are living in a world wherein everything is in flux and where all things are related (mitakuye oyasin) here there are no ‘BEINGS’ as are needed to support the imputing of GROWTH where there is only, in sense-experience reality, TRANSFORMATION in which case it takes the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS for there to be a GROWING OF THE TOWN.

(more…)

ACKNOWLEDGING OUR INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD

0

 

AUTHOR’S INTRODUCTION TO THIS ESSAY:—ACKNOWLEDGING OUR INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD

It is VERY CHALLENGING, because of the limitations of this BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE (LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING) SCHEME I am using, to convey the QUANTUM LOGIC ideas I am sharing. This is because  QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTS TRANSCEND BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTS in the manner that “PURELY RELATIONAL WHORLINGS IN FLOWING” are less simple than “INDEPENDENT BEINGS IN EMPTY SPACE”. In the case of  “WHORLINGS IN FLOWING”, we must, instead of having an understanding wherein we can split things apart and focus on “THEM”  as if “THEY”  are “INDEPENDENT”, … “ACKNOWLEDGE that “THERE ARE ONLY “RELATIONS” AND THERE ARE NO “THINGS” (i.e. there are only “condensations of and in the flowing energy-charged wave-field wherein everything is related” as expressed by “mitakuye oyasin”)  This purely FLOW-BASED RELATIONAL REALITY or in other words, THIS QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein THE WHORLINGS “ARE” THE FLOWING recalls Heraclitus’ “EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX”  which anticipated the Modern Physics understanding of our inclusion in THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD  wherein “everything is in flux”, including condensations.

We know that we can understand the world in a relational manner that TRANSCENDS our standard way of speaking of REALITY in terms of the dynamics of INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEING-THINGS such as HUMANS and NATIONS N FAS IF SUCH SEPARATE THINGS REALLY EXISTED rather than being SIMPLIFYING ABSTRACTIONS designed by GROUPS OF INTELLECTUAL TWO-LEGGEDS who have invented them as part of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES, some of which are SEPARATE, INDEPENDENT FRAGMENT BASED, … while we continue to sing with passion, songs in praise of our NATURAL INTERCONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE  such as “WE ARE THE WORLD”  and “IMAGINE”  (e.g. “imagine there’s no (fragmenting) countries, its isnt’ hard to do”).

We sing with honesty and heartfelt fervor because we long for a solution to the persisting FRAGMENTATION and violence in the world and we hunger for the relational resonances we know we are capable of co-cultivating in our informal apolitical relations. DID WE REALLY NEED THE HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have developed in conjunction with DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE of NATIONS and HUMAN-BEINGS that ABSTRACTLY DIVIDE US AND PUT US IN “SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST” COMPETITION WITH ONE ANOTHER? 

Many of our TWO-LEGGED brothers and sisters (e.g. indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents) have opted for very different LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES which PRESERVE the natural FLUIDITY, INTERCONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE of our sense-experience of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD WORLD, as affirmed by the indigenous aboriginal aphorism “MITAKUYE OYASIN”, … “EVERYTHING IS RELATED”.

SURE, things can go wrong and things have been going wrong in the TWO-LEGGEDS’ development of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION-based communications schemes, which have retained MORE or LESS GROUNDING in sense-experience.  That is, the FLOW-BASED schemes are MORE GROUNDED in sense-experience than the BEING-BASED schemes which are MORE GROUNDED IN INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION.  For example, in the FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, one may say THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which employs the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM; i.e. THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is a FLOWING PLENUM within which the TOWNING is an included FLOW-FEATURE whereby EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.   In the BEING-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is FRAGMENTED by a BINARY LOGIC SPLIT into TWO INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS, ‘THE TOWN’ as a LOCAL, EXPLICIT, INDEPENDENT THING-IN-ITSELF and the LANDSCAPE as a SEPARATE and INDEPENDENT CONTAINING SPACE.

While there is this choice of FLOW-based and BEING-based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES, each have their own strong-points and weak points, and while the WESTERN CULTURE has opted for BEING-based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, it has been pointed out by MODERN PHYSICS that FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is more consistent with sense-experience than BEING-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, the latter being the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

The FRAGMENTATION is a straight forward understanding since the imposing of BEING on relational forms is clearly going to FRAGMENT the PSYCHOLOGICAL TAKE-AWAYS from this type of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  For example, in the process of OBJECTIFYING the “TOWN” in SPLITTING IT OUT OF THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, it has been necessary to INVENT an “IMAGINARY” ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE CONTAINER to support such THING-IN-ITSELF CONCEPTUALIZING.  This is obviously a recipe for FRAGMENTATION and not quite so obviously a recipe for OBSCURANTISM. That is, while we have GRAMMAR to re-animate the now INDEPENDENT TOWN and give it the capabilities of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods, … this is all MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING capability .  WHAT HAPPENED TO THE “CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS”?

In order to MAKE ROOM for the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AS IF IN ITS OWN RIGHT (i.e. as if were situated within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE), there must be a DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate. This is achieved by the SUBSTITUTING of ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the MISSING FEMALE (the DEA ABSCONDITA (GODDESS IN HIDING).

Here we can see that we are PAYING A HEAVY PRICE in this BINARY LOGIC based SIMPLIFYING (DUMBING DOWN) of our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING since in order to speak in SIMPLER TERMS of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AS IF ON ITS OWN, we have to arrange for the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING which is the ALL-INCLUDING NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT energy-charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD… TO “GO MISSING” so that the “LOCAL AND EXPLICIT” CONDENSATION aka the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, can STRUT ITS STUFF AS IF AN ‘INDEPENDENT BEING’ without sharing performance credits with the “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT” FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate.

MEANWHILE, this INDEPENDENT BEING is “APPEARANCE” only, just as the GROWING TOWN is exposed as only “APPEARANCE” when we fill in what we have blanked out; i.e. the conjugate SHRINKING of WILDERNESS, which, when re-joined with the GROWING TOWN (there were never split apart except in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING) reaffirms the sense-experience reality of the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

In our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, we put the onus on BEING for the AUTHORING of actions and development, since the ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE has NO POWERS OF AUTHORSHIP. Ok, we wanted to SIMPLIFY our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME by promoting the secondary CONDENSATIONS of and in the WAVE-FIELD to PRIMARY STATUS as LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING THINGS living in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, so we FORCED OURSELVES to RELOCATE the PRIMARY ANIMATING INFLUENCE from the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM since were SUBSTITUTING for it, ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE, and weirdly enough, we resituated the AUTHORING ENERGY SOURCE into one of its own AUTHORED creations, the MATERIAL CONDENSATION. This is OBSCURANTISM since it notionally relocates AUTHORING AGENCY FROM the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (which we are simply DROPPING OUT) to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONDENSATIONS of the NO-LONGER-EXISTING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM. Those CONDENSATIONS, while APPEARING LOCAL and EXPLICIT, actually OWED THEIR EXISTENCE TO THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUN in which they are CONDENSATIONS, so the SUBSTITUTING of the ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM “PULLED THE RUG OUT FROM UNDER THE FEET of the CONDENSATIONS; i.e. “CONDENSATIONS OF WHAT?  … EMPTY SPACE?”

The DROPPING OUT, in the BEING based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, of any/all “ACKNOWLEDGEMENT” of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate CRIPPLES our conceptualizing of dynamics by constraining the dynamic to one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING  and here’s the KICKER, … THE DROPPED OUT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate is the source of influence which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT  (coming from the containing energy-charged PLENUM).  The RETAINED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate is the source of influence which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT (coming from the male asserting/actualizing).

WAIT A MINUTE!  The WAVE-FIELD DOES NOT ACTUALLY SPLIT APART INTO MALE and FEMALE COMPONENTS, that is only APPEARANCE since these “TWO” are really only TWO APPEARANCE BASED ASPECTS of the ONE WAVE-FIELD, … so those words that seem to treat the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING as TWO SEPARATE agencies are MISLEADING, and that is what is cropping up with the DEA ABSCONDITA (Goddess in hiding) because while we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have designed a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, … THIS CAN’T BE DONE IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, it can only be done in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS which can be CONFUSING because we are using these LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS AS OUR “OPERATIVE REALITY”.

Social relational dynamics are being shaped by our choice of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES, the major difference being FLOW-BASED QUANTUM LOGIC based) and BEING-BASED (BINARY LOGIC based) SCHEMES  The indigenous aboriginal organizing approach is FLOW-BASED and supports the understanding that ‘WE ARE ALL RELATED’ (mitakuye oyasin) which is a QUANTUM LOGIC based understanding (that we are all strands in the one-web aka condensations in the one energy-charged plenum) and lies beyond the simplicity of our WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based model wherein we see ourselves as INDEPENDENT BEINGS with OUR OWN POWERS of AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.

This has led to the development of a corresponding JUSTICE system which is NOT RESTORATIVE (resolving dissonances within the INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT RELATIONAL WEB), … but PURIFICATIONIST (eliminating those LOCAL INDEPENDENT BEINGS notionally equipped with THEIR OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING BAD ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.   The HUGE DISCONNECT between these two understanding of the basic physics of social dynamics is a REALITY that complicates my task of sharing the DIFFERENCES that arise in QUANTUM LOGIC thinking and acting relative to BINARY LOGIC thinking and acting.   For example, understanding reality using QUANTUM LOGIC opens our minds to the world as a relational matrix of INTERCONNNECTIONS and INTERDEPENDENCIES; a WEB-OF-LIFE that is understood in MODERN PHYSICS, in terms of CONDENSATIONS of an all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD wherein the FLUID PLENUM is PRIMARY and the CONDENSATIONS are only APPEARANCE (Schaumkommen) in the same sense as WHORLINGS in FLOWING where the FLOWING (wave-field) is PRIMARY and the WHORLINGS (condensations) are “APPEARANCE”.

Distinguishing terms such as BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC and QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC and others, are clearly needed.  In any case, if you put yourself in my shoes and contemplate the task of writing on the topic ACKNOWLEDGING OUR INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, you may get a sense of the challenge of putting into writing what it would take to switch one’s LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of REALITY from a MATERIAL basis to a WAVE-FIELD basis as has been done by Bohm and Schroedinger and others, which involves a profound shift in understanding that has induced many to shift from either atheism, Judaism, Christianity or Islam which are all strongly BINARY LOGIC oriented, to Taoism and Advaita Vedanta which are strongly QUANTUM LOGIC oriented.

What most of us don’t think of because of the way we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are educated from birth which is highly BINARY LOGIC grounded, is the more informative (in a sense-experience affirming context) QUANTUM LOGIC way of understanding the world as compared to the BINARY LOGIC alternative.  This very basic shift in one’s worldview that comes with upgrading from SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC to LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC is the message of David Bohm and Krishna Murti and Schroedinger and many others including myself.  It is a psychological shift and not simply an updating of our intellectual knowledge banks.

QUANTUM LOGIC is the logic on indigenous aboriginals which is advocated in this familiar phrase;

“Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.  —Chief Seattle”

(more…)

THE TRICKY BIT IN: UNDERSTANDING THE DIVISIVE VIEWS OF HOW THE WORLD WORKS

0

AUTHOR’S PREFACE:  

 

I am including this AUTHOR’S PREFACE to explain that there is a PROBLEM IN COMMUNICATING USING OUR WESTERN CULTURE STANDARD LANGUAGE since in its STANDARD USAGE MODE, it DROPS OUT the most basic component of WAVE-FIELD expression which is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT component which in mathematics is called the IMAGINARY component which is needed together with the LOCAL and EXPLICIT component.  For example, the expression; “To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose” implies that the individual is included in something greater than himself, in which case IF we are instead speaking in LOCAL, EXPLICIT terms such as ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’, which is in terms of WHAT THINGS DO, we are at a LOWER LEVEL of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING than the previous phrase which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

 

In VERB-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING as used in indigenous aboriginal cultures and MODERN PHYSICS that captures a physical reality where everything is in flux (as with CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD) where we may say “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, we have a WAVE-FIELD structure wherein there is the COMBINATION of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ‘CONTAINER” and LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONTENT which are also referred to as IMAGINARY and REAL components in WAVE-FIELED mathematics.  While indigenous aboriginal languages and other flow-based languages (e.g. Bohm’s Rheomode language) have this ANDROGYNOUS conceptualizing capability where there is a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate (THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) together with a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate (THE TOWNING THAT IS “INCLUDED IN” THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE). These two comprise a QUANTUM LOGIC RELATION.  QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM, and it plays a foundational role in indigenous aboriginal languages and DIFFERS from the SIMPLER BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC which SPLITS APART the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, and in the process CONCRETIZING “TOWNING” by SUBSTITUTING the BEING based “TOWN” as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for “the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.

 

This WESTERN CULTURE REDUCTION of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING from LESS-SIMPLE QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC to SIMPLE BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC, an example of which is where we start with “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, and end up with a new, BEING-based PSEUDO-REALITY such as “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING AND PRODUCING goods”.   While we started with a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (the WAVE-FIELD), the reduction from QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC, by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate, left us with ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate which conveys “BEING-BASED LOCAL AUTHORING” which Nietzsche calls “THE DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR”.  This DOUBLE ERROR is the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM in our ongoing WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHOLOGICAL and SOCIAL DYNAMICS.

 

SO, THE WESTERN CULTURE DROPPING OUT of our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, aka the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, A DROPPING OUT which is sometimes referred to as the DEA ABSCONDITA (the GODDESS IN HIDING), … TOGETHER WITH AN ASSOCIATED SUBSTITUTING OF AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, CREATES A ‘PLAYING FIELD’ for “BEING-BASED LOCAL AUTHORING” (the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR).  THERE IS NO SUCH THING as “BEING-BASED LOCAL AUTHORING”; i.e. we live in a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD, however, the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR BASED CONCEPT OF “LOCAL AUTHORING”  does GREAT THINGS FOR THE EGO so it has been a KEEPER in MODERN WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES even though it is FUNDAMENTALLY AT ODDS with the understanding that WE ARE INCLUDED IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD as implied in “To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose”.

 

The EGO-INFLATING LOCAL AUTHORING POWER that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS lay claim to by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, which garners essential support from the SUBSTITUTING of ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD, is CONTRADICTED by “To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose” SINCE this CONTRADICTS the notion that we are INDEPENDENT BEINGS with LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS who are situated within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE which we are giving a foundational role to in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, as where we say ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ and/or ‘the HUMAN IS GROWING’. 

This type of DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR construction is a WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING STANDARD which leads to DOUBLE ERRORS of NAMING and GRAMMAR that are the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM by DROPPING OUT the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD CONTAINER and promoting the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONTENT, as seen in constructs such as “HAMAS slaughtered 1200 Israelis”, which is TRUE, in the sense of Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS, but it is NOT REALITY in the same sense that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ is also TRUE in the Goedel’s Theorem sense of TRUE but INCOMPLETE since there is NO MENTION of the SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS which is conjugate to the GROWING OF THE TOWN.  In the indigenous aboriginal culture, there is no DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that implies LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development from which follows FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.  The flow-based language supported understanding is that “everything is related” (mitakuye oyasin) in which case, AUTHORING is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT which rules out PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE and supports RESTORATIVE JUSTICE.  This understanding is supported by MODERN PHYSICS.

“HAMAS slaughtered 1200 Israelis” as a LOGICAL PROPOSITION is INCOMPLETE and is an example of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that implies LOCAL AUTHORING which contradicts the understanding of ‘mitakuye oyasin’ (everything is related) “Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.” reaffirming that ‘everything is related’ in which case the required response to VIOLENCE cannot be the isolating and ELIMINATING of the perceived LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHOR since there are no LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORS in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT WEB-OF-LIFE which means that JUSTICE must be RESTORATIVE rather than PURIFICATIONIST.

Whatever LOGICAL PROPOSITION we formulate, because it is a one-sided male-asserting/actualizing proposition that is missing the female accommodating/including conjugate that is part of any real sense-experience in the all-including WAVE-FIELD, it is INCOMPLETE.  THE PROBLEM in using “TRUE BUT INCOMPLETE” LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS such as “THE TOWN IS GROWING” is that they capture only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD conjugate but DROP OUT or FAIL TO INCLUDE THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate which is, in this example, the SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS.  While the LANGUAGE I AM RIGHT NOW USING IS ‘SPEAKING” in terms of TWO THINGS; i.e. the TOWN THAT IS GROWING and the WILDERNESS THAT IS SHRINKING, that SPLITTING APART is coming from my use of BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC which is SIMPLER than QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC.

 

The MOMENT WE THINK OF STRIFE, such as in OUTBREAKS OF VIOLENCE, we may understand STRIFE in terms of RELATIONAL DISSONANCE which is in QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING TERMS (wherein ‘we are all related’ as with strands in a web).  In this case, “Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.” where there is no such thing as a LOCAL AUTHOR of violence, where the violence is instead of a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT source which requires a RESTORATIVE JUSTICE (i.e. subsuming dissonance in the web by co-cultivating resonance), ..OR, … we may understand STRIFE in the BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING terms of INDEPENDENT BEINGS IN POLARIZED CONFLICT, SOME perceived as GOOD and SOME perceived as BAD, engaging with one another as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE PLAYING FIELD, an understanding that leads to PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE (i.e. seeking the elimination of BAD INDEPENDENT BEINGS which is a recipe for mutual annihilation in the event that the combatants, rather than being INDEPENDENT, are INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT as in the ‘web-of-life’ ).

 * * * * * * * END OF AUTHOR’S PREFACE  * * * * * * * * * * * 

 

 

 

ERRORS IN “THE TRICKY BIT IN: UNDERSTANDING THE DIVISIVE VIEWS OF HOW THE WORLD WORKS”

THERE ARE TWO ERRORS (that I wish to correct) in the ESSAY i.e. there are two places where I say “ interconnected and interrelated” which is REDUNDANT where I intended to say “interconnected and interdependent”

 This is the actual case and the important difference is that interconnected and interdependent” means influences APPEARING to derive from a particular strand in the web are of a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) nature.  This is a key understanding of the WAVE-FIELD structure which is beyond the scope of being expressed in simple BINARY LOGIC terms wherein, if we were investigating the origin of emergent dynamics, we would assess the contribution of each involved independent element assuming the independent contribution of independent elements.    In the case of a relational web, it is like a web made from attaching elastic bands together to form a large web, anchoring it to the ceiling and hanging weights to the lower bands, then setting things in motion, and a strange motion it will be, that will be continually shifting and involving different strands with different energies and motions.  It is the sort of example given to illustrate the unpredictability of nonlinear dynamics.

 

What I am saying with this example, is that when we have a system containing multiple components that are making joint contributions (as in strands in the web), it is like we are in a BUMPER CAR GAME at the amusement park where at some point, there is a violent collision and we stop to take stock of what happened.  What we know is that there is a serious collision wherein there is a “perpetrator” and a “victim” (and imagine this happening on a crowded freeway where a dog had suddenly darted across the freeway setting everyone to swerving, braking and accelerating and the whole crazy flow goes on for several miles in the traffic ‘line-up’ possibly without there being any collisions.  But if there is a collision, the easy part is to identify a local, explicit perpetrator and victim but as in the case of many strands in the web, it would be INCOMPLETE to consider only the TWO CARS INVOLVED (allowing the reduction to simple binary logic) and to hold the so-called perpetrator RESPONSIBLE for the damage to the “victim”.  Now, I am NOT DENYING that there is a quote/unquote VICTIM who really did get injured and I am NOT DENYING that there is a PERPETRATOR, but here is where GOEDEL’S THEOREM comes in once again which says that ALL FINITE PROPOSITIONS OF LOGIC ARE INCOMPLETE because while THE  PROPOSITION IS VERIFIABLY TRUE that there is a PERPETRATOR that is responsible for CRASHING INTO AND CREATING A “VICTIM”, that LOGIC is INCOMPLETE in that it is only THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT expression of an event that has a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ASPECT.

 For example, if we were involved in such an incident and were labelled the PERPETRATOR in the BINARY LOGIC PERPETRATOR-VICTIM  DESCRIPTION, we would want to point out that WE WERE PUSHED FROM BEHIND WHICH WAS THE CAUSE OF THE COLLISION.  But the PROSECUTOR could establish the TRUTH (supported by eye-witnesses) that MY CAR had CRASHED INTO the VICTIM’S CAR, making me the PERPETRATOR of the resulting DAMAGE and INJURIES.  The FRUSTRATION I would be feeling as I protested this over-simplistic analysis would be intensified by having to answer questions from the PROSECUTION wherein I could not avoid acknowledging that IT WAS TRUE THAT MY CAR HAD CRASHED INTO THE VICTIM’S CAR.  My frustration would be coming from the fact that THAT TRUTH WAS INCOMPLETE, making NO MENTION of being pushed from behind by…? a whole line-up of cars, the drivers of which were in some cases having their foot on the brakes and in other cases having their foot on the accelerator.

THE THIS IS WHERE GOEDEL’S THEOREM OF THE INCOMPLETENESS OF ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS GIVES US AN IMPORTANT INSIGHT … BUT WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE IS BINARY (EITHER/OR) LOGIC based FOR THE VERY REASON THAT BINARY LOGIC PROVIDES IRON-GATED JUDGEMENTS OF “EITHER” GUILTY “OR” INNOCENT of charges prepared in the form of LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS, … LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS THAT ARE “INNATELY INCOMPLETE”, WHICH ARE FOR THAT REASON, NEVER USED IN AN INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL JUSTICE which is RESTORATIVE rather than PUNITIVE.

 

That is, Indigenous aboriginal JUSTICE , as formulated in language that is less simple (than BINARY LOGIC) QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC  of the INCLUDING MEDIUM based (wherein everything is INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT) and for this reason is RESTORATIVE JUSTICE because emergent outcomes DO NOT HAVE A LOCAL, EXPLICIT SOURCE since everything is INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT, where, when one strand in the web ‘BECOMES VIOLENT’ , it is impossible to determine a LOCAL and EXPLICIT SOURCE of the VIOLENCE since the INTERCONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE of the strands in the web give rise to dynamics that are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).  This is why, when there is a VIOLENT INCIDENT, the response is the HEALING CIRCLE where the community comes together to resolve hidden tensions in the social relational web, that MANIFEST THROUGH A PARTICULAR STRAND IN THE WEB BUT WHICH ARE NOT “SOURCED” BY THAT STRAND.   A RESTORATIVE JUSTICE based approach follows from this understanding, as constrasts with WESTERN CULTURE PUNITIVE JUSTICE which follows from the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION of COMMUNITY as a COLLECTION OF INDEPENDENT BEINGS that move about and interact in a NON-CONNECTING, INFINITE EMPTY SPACE.

The indigenous aboriginal “STRANDS IN THE WEB” understanding is supported by MODERN PHYSICS since the same INTERCONNECTING and INTERDEPENDENT relations apply to MATERIAL FORMS that are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD .  Because of the INTERCONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE of the CONDENSATIONS of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka the strands in the web), the ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT of the ‘LOCAL CONDENSATION’ (aka local strand in the web) CANNOT BE ATTRIBUTED TO THE ‘LOCAL CONDENSATION’ (aka local strand in the web) due to the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT NATURE OF EVENTS (i.e. the person “holding the smoking gun” is the strand in the relational web that is VENTING the tensions in the web AND NOT THE LOCAL AUTHOR OF THE VIOLENT ACTIONS which are VENTING THROUGH HIM, the origins of which are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) as in a web of interconnecting, interdependent elastic strands where a particular LOCAL EXPLICIT strand may LOAD tensions FROM other LOCAL, EXPLICIT strands or  UNLOAD tensions onto other LOCAL, EXPLICIT strands so that a PARTICULAR LOCAL, EXPLICIT STRAND THAT IS SEEN AS THE AUTHOR OF VIOLENT ACTIONS IS NOT THE “LOCAL, EXPLICIT SOURCE” OF THE VIOLENCE BUT THE LOCAL VENT FOR THE UNLOADING OF TENSIONS WHICH ARE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT(RELATIONAL) IN ORIGIN.

This understanding of overall INTERCONNECTEDNESS and INTERDEPENDENCE is what is affirmed in the indigenous aboriginal expression MITAKUYE OYASIN (everything is related), and this structure of reality is equally affirmed by MODERN PHYSICS wherein all material forms (Their “INDEPENDENCE” as if in an empty space is “APPEARANCE” aka “SCHAUMKOMMEN”), though they may APPEAR INDEPENDENT, by virtue of their being CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, ARE INTERCONNECTED AND INTERDEPENDENT.  

 

GIVEN THAT one’s model of reality is this LESS SIMPLE but sense-experience affirmed model which acknowledges the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT AUTHORING of what transpires, it would not make sense to prosecute the person ‘holding the smoking gun’ (the alleged perpetrator) as in the BINARY LOGIC based PERPETRATOR-VICTIM LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.   YES, IT IS TRUE that CAR 17 was the PERPETRATOR that crashed into CAR 51 driven by the VICTIM, but as Goedel’s Theorem says, that is an INCOMPLETE TRUTH as is the nature of all finite LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS.

 

To say that HAMAS is the perpetrator and Israelis are the victim is TRUE, but it is an INCOMPLETE TRUTH because it is only the BINARY LOGIC based LOCAL and EXPLICIT capturing of what went on, which is included within a QUANTUM LOGIC NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT unfolding which is MORE REALISTIC and WITHIN WHICH the TRUE-but-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC CONSTRUCTION is INCLUDED.

 

The less simple but more realistic understanding calls for RESTORATIVE JUSTICE, which is what indigenous aboriginal cultures have developed while the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC “LESS REALISTIC but MORE CONCISE AND DEFINITIVE” PUNITIVE JUSTICE is what WESTERN CULTURE has chosen to go with and there is a CLEAR REASON for this which has been ‘seen through’ by Nietzsche and it is EGO.   In order to be LOGICALLY CONSISTENT, those who make use of the SIMPLE CONCEPT OF LOCAL AUTHORING that comes with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, which as we have seen IS LOGICALLY TRUE; i.e. THE LOCAL AUTHOR of the CAR CRASH is the identified PERPETRATOR, but while it is TRUE, it is INCOMPLETE.

 

BUT CONSIDER THE MAN WITH THE BIG EGO, or the STATE with the BIG EGO, … WHY NOT GO WITH THE LOGICAL TRUTH of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, as WE BUILT THE TOWN, which is PROVABLY TRUE?  But at the same TIME, it is INCOMPLETE because it DROPS OUT THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT which covers the reality of the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE.

 

Here we can see HOW IT CAN BE that indigenous aboriginals have developed RESTORATIVE JUSTICE because the concept of LOCAL AUTHORING (of the perpetrator), while TRUE is INCOMPLETE because it is only dealing with the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, e.g. where CAR 17  CRASHES INTO CAR 51 but here we are only looking at STRANDS IN A COMPLEX WEB OF RELATIONS as develop in the BUMPER CAR GAME.  As we know from being in a BUMPER CAR WE ARE DOING SO MUCH BUMPING OF OTHERS AND AT THE SAME TIME GETTING SO MUCH BUMPING FROM OTHERS that the REAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE SHAPE OF OUR TRAJECTORY IS CERTAINLY NOT ‘OURS ALONE’ and as a matter of fact, it is likely to be LESS OURS than the MANY OTHERS, and IMPOSSIBLE to SOLVE FOR, in which case, in a comparable real life situation, it may be WISER to FOCUS ON RESTORING HARMONY than to try to IDENTIFY IN QUANTITATIVE TERMS, THE AUTHORS OF DISSONANCE.

 

* * * * * *

WESTERN CULTURE PERSISTS IN USING THE CONCEPT OF LOCAL AUTHORING IN SPITE OF THE FACT THAT WHILE IT IS TRUE, IT IS NOT CAPTURING REALITY, BUT IT IS GREAT FOR THE EGO BECAUSE IT IS POSSIBLE TO USE INCOMPLETE TRUTH TO LAY CLAIMS TO ACHIEVEMENTS VIA LOCAL AUTHORING THAT ARE TRUE BUT NOT REAL.  For example, the claim that WE CONSTRUCTED A TOWN may be TRUE but it will be INCOMPLETE because we do not mention the SHRINKING OF and DAMAGE to the WILDERNESS.

 

WESTERN CULTURE IS A CULTURE THAT HAS ASSIMILATED WITHIN OUR REWARDS AND PUNISHMENTS SYSTEMS, THE USE OF BINARY LOGIC based TRUTHS which can be PROVEN TRUE but which are UNREAL and which support the construction of a PSEUDO-REALITY that is UNREAL, such as where THE TOWN IS GROWING … FULL STOP… which as Bohm points out is FRAGMENTATIVE and OBSCURANTIST and which Nietzsche points out is “A DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR”;


Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

 

This supports claims of LOCAL AUTHORING that INFLATE THE EGO;

 

Nietzsche is pointing to basic issues with LANGUAGE, including how our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME CAN BE USED TO “INFLATE THE EGO”;

 

In its origin language belongs in the age of the most rudimentary form of psychology. We enter a realm of crude fetishism when we summon before consciousness the basic presuppositions of the metaphysics of language, in plain talk, the presuppositions of reason. Everywhere it sees a doer and doing; it believes in will as the cause; it believes in the ego, in the ego as being, in the ego as substance, and it projects this faith in the ego-substance upon all things — only thereby does it first create the concept of “thing.” Everywhere “being” is projected by thought, pushed underneath, as the cause; the concept of being follows, and is a derivative of, the concept of ego. In the beginning there is that great calamity of an error that the will is something which is effective, that will is a faculty. Today we know that it is only a word.” – Nietzsche, ‘Twilight of the Idols’

 

 

* * * * * END OF “ERRORS IN “THE TRICKY BIT IN: UNDERSTANDING THE DIVISIVE VIEWS OF HOW THE WORLD WORKS” * * * *

 

 

THE TRICKY BIT IN: UNDERSTANDING THE DIVISIVE VIEWS OF HOW THE WORLD WORKS.

The Tricky bit for a WESTERN CULTURE RAISED READER is in getting past CAPTIVITY by BINARY LOGIC thinking so that we can EVEN “TRY OUT” THINKING IN A QUANTUM LOGIC MANNER.   TEST YOURSELF on whether you can put yourself in the shoes of an indigenous aboriginal person that understands the world as a world wherein everything is interconnected and interdependent wherein we are STRANDS in the all-including WEB of life.

(more…)

Go to Top