An inclusional worldview
Archive for November, 2024
How we get FOOLED by the Cuckoo’s Egg of BINARY LOGIC
0November 25, 2024
by ted lumley
in APN
How we get FOOLED by the Cuckoo’s Egg of BINARY LOGIC
WE NEED QUANTUM LOGIC!
QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC
QUANTUM LOGIC is where we say “There is HUMANING in the transforming continuum” (where everything is in flux and humanings are included flow-features)
BINARY LOGIC is where we say “Yesterday, I saw three HUMANS walking down the street” (where Humans are BEING based CONTENT situated in a separate CONTAINER).
QUANTUM LOGIC is “BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM” where “HUMANINGS are BOTH FEATURES in the FLOWING MEDIUM like WHORLINGS in FLOWING, and, are at the same time, the FLOWING MEDIUM”
* * *
BINARY LOGIC is “EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM” where “HUMANS” are INDEPENDENT beings in empty space that we know by their material components.
“Now, what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else. You can only form the minds of reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of any service to them. This is the principle on which I bring up my own children, and this is the principle on which I bring up these children. Stick to the Facts, sir!”
‘Bitzer,’ said Thomas Gradgrind. ‘Your definition of a horse.’
‘Quadruped. Graminivorous. Forty teeth, namely twenty-four grinders, four eye-teeth, and twelve incisive. Sheds coat in the spring; in marshy countries, sheds hoofs, too. Hoofs hard, but requiring to be shod with iron. Age known by marks in mouth.’ Thus (and much more) Bitzer.
— Charles Dickens, ‘Hard Times’
QUANTUM LOGIC is relational and WITHOUT DEPENDENCY ON ‘THINGS’, and we use it to come to understand things PURELY by way of relations. Geoffrey Chew is a QUANTUM PHYSICS researcher and he describes ‘bootstrapping’ (building understanding up solely from relations), like this.
[Geoffrey Chew]: “when you formulate a question, you have to have some basic concepts that you are accepting in order to formulate the question. But in the bootstrap approach, where the whole system represents a network of relationships without any firm foundation, the description of subject can be begun at a great variety of different places. There isn’t any clear starting point. And the way our theory has developed in the last few years, we quite typically don’t know what questions to ask. We use consistency as the guide, and each increase in the consistency suggests something that is incomplete, but it rarely takes the form of a well-defined question. We are going beyond the whole question-and-answer framework’.
BINARY LOGIC IS USED TO UNDERSTAND THINGS IN TERMS OF INDEPENDENT “MATERIAL BEINGS” EXPLAINABLE BY THEIR LOCAL, EXPLICIT COMPONENTS.
QUANTUM LOGIC IS USED TO UNDERSTAND THINGS PURELY IN TERMS OF RELATIONS WITHOUT ANY FOUNDATIONAL DEPENDENCY ON “BEING”
INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES ARE QUANTUM LOGIC BASED (RELATIONS BASED); e.g. “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”. (or, “THERE IS HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM”
WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES ARE BINARY LOGIC BASED (BEING BASED); e.g. “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING GOODS”, (or, “THE HUMAN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING GOODS”
* * * * * *
We can see from this comparison that WHILE WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES BUILD IN DEPENDENCY ON ‘BEING’ (“THINGS THAT ARE SAID TO MATERIALLY EXIST”) and “WHAT THINGS DO”, indigenous aboriginal languages are RELATIONAL and without dependency on the ABSTRACTION of NAMING-INSTANTIATED “BEING” (e.g. instead using relational inference such as ‘dances with wolves’).
501 WORDS that explain how WE ARE ON A BUSTRIP TO HELL
0November 12, 2024
by ted lumley
in APN
The REALITY is that the indigenous aboriginals are right, we are strands in an interconnecting, interdependent WEB-OF-LIFE which means that RESTORATIVE JUSTICE is right because the person locally manifesting violent or destructive behaviour is NOT the AUTHOR of such violent VENTING but the strand-in-the-web-CONDUIT that is a CHANNEL for discharging what has been building in the relational web. Because there is no LOCAL AUTHOR of violent actions, indigenous aboriginal Justice is Restorative.
The Abrahamic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam all share BINARY LOGIC based views of the world as a collection of INDEPENDENT BEINGS with ‘our own’ powers of AUTHORING actions and developments in which case the LOCAL AUTHOR of VIOLENCE is seen as the FULLY AND SOLELY RESPONSIBLE AUTHOR of the VIOLENCE, and IS NOT SEEN, as in indigenous aboriginal culture wherein ‘mitakuye oyasin’ (everything is related) applies, as the CONDUIT or VENT for the releasing of tensions that develop and build within the social-relational matrix. So, the indigenous aboriginal culture responds to outbreaks of violence (rape, murder, theft) with HEALING CIRCLES since the roots of the problem are seen as deriving from ‘tensions in the relational web’ and are simply finding a venting outlet through an individual strand-in-the-web.
BECAUSE social collectives influenced by Judaism, Christianity and Islam are dominant in GLOBAL social administration, the popular interpretation of the source of rising conflict is that it has a LOCAL, EXPLICIT SOURCE; e.g. as in the Hamas – Israeli conflict. In psychologists’ terms in dealing with strife in families, where there is strife, the one who is identified as the AUTHOR has been labelled ‘the identified patient’ since the whole social-relational matrix is dysfunctional but it is typical that there will be one ‘holding the smoking gun’ who will be identified as the LOCAL, EXPLICIT “INDEPENDENT BEING’ that is the AUTHOR of the violence. Meanwhile, in the indigenous aboriginal ‘web-of-life’ understanding, THE TENSIONED WEB is the AUTHOR and it is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, and this understanding accords with the QUANTUM LOGIC model wherein material CONDENSATIONS (people) are secondary, in terms of authoring source, to the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.
So, in WESTERN CULTURE, while the nonlocal relational web is the AUTHOR of the VIOLENCE, the STRAND IN THE WEB that becomes the VENT for collective tensions, is MISTAKENLY IDENTIFIED AS THE AUTHOR.
In the indigenous aboriginal culture, as in Modern physics, EVERYTHING IS RELATED, thus the ATTACKING STRANDS and the ATTACKED STRANDS are part of the same WEB.
This is why we are ON A BUSTRIP TO HELL, since our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE, which is in a global leadership position, is committed to the eliminating of what are perceived as noxious independent beings and factions, which are in fact violent strands in the one, all-including web, that have become violent through the inequities and insensitivities, largely of those strands that are convinced not only of their own ‘independence’ but of their own superiority and innocence.
* * *
FOOTNOTE: Since WEB-BASED AUTHORING of actions and development is NONLOCALLY INSPIRED, the approach of social collectives that attempts to MANAGE dynamics in a manner that assumes LOCAL AUTHORING of actions, is doomed to failure (such an approach ‘has its ladder up the wrong wall’). The indigenous aboriginal ‘HEALING CIRCLE’ which encourages “SPEAKING FROM THE HEART” rather than “FROM THE HEAD”, prevents the INTELLECT from inappropriate domination in attempting to resolve NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT issues that are beyond the LOCAL and EXPLICIT analytics of the INTELLECT; e.g. no amount of interrogation of the ‘Identified Patient’ (a strand in the web) will deliver understanding of the web dynamic.
We can think of a web in terms of (A) a LOCAL, EXPLICIT thing with arms like a starfish, or, (A’) a NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT NON-THING constituted by many implicit arms (‘all my relations”) where LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING-based ‘thingness is APPEARANCE’.
Most Recent Comments