DEAR READER,

 

My philosophical investigations have led me to comparisons of our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which is BEING based… with indigenous aboriginal LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES which are FLOW-BASED, and which are arguably more REALISTIC because we are living in a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM wherein everything is in flux, INCLUDING OURSELVES.   Once one GETS INTO THIS kind of investigation, understanding can pop out which shed light on things that were previously ‘in the shadows’, by virtue of how our particular culture focuses on some things and not on others.  For example, we may be more interested in the fetching of oysters than in the access enabling or inhibiting influence of the tides so that our linguistic conceptualizations DO NOT EVEN MENTION the OVER-RIDING INFLUENCE of the transforming ambiance we share inclusion in (solar irradiance, atmospheric conditions, tides etc.) making it APPEAR (from our linguistic conceptualizing) that our REALITY is ALL ABOUT US and OUR ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENTS, ESCAPADES and ACHIEVEMENTS, … all of which is MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and “WITHOUT MENTION OF THE OVER-RIDING INFLUENCE of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING AMBIENT CONDITIONS THAT WE ARE INCLUDED IN such as ‘the tide in the affairs of men’, … or in other words, the reality that ‘to everything there is a season’, … which point to real influences that are often NOT INCLUDED in our WESTERN CULTURE system of linguistic conceptualization because it is BEING based (we construct impressions of reality based on notional ‘material BEING things and their actions and interactions) which is a one-sided male asserting/actualizing construction that is missing the female accommodating/enabling conjugate.  The example just given points to how we commonly talk about the collecting of oysters WITHOUT MENTIONING OUR “BEING AT THE MERCY OF THE TIDES” and having to stand-by for two weeks prior to ‘doing our gathering of oysters’.   By NOT MENTIONING that we humans were like puppets on Natures strings (at the mercy of the tides) and by using simple male asserting/actualizing propositions (we collected oysters) while DROPPING OUT the female accommodating/enabling conjugate (… subject to the dynamics of nature opening up accommodating/enabling conditions to FACILITATE our male asserting/actualizing actions), we promote the MISTAKEN IMPRESSION that we are the LOCAL AUTHORS of our own actions and developments. 

 

THIS IS A WESTERN CULTURE “HABIT” of giving “MISTAKEN IMPRESSIONS” that we have “BUILT INTO OUR WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME using (as Nietzsche has pointed out) THE “DOUBLE ERROR” OF “NAMING AND GRAMMAR” which gives us the capability of INJECTING INTO OUR DISCOURSE, WHERE WE CHOOSE TO DO IT, … THE NOTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.    INSTEAD OF CAPTURING THE REALITY THAT ‘NATURES’S DYNAMICS (THE CHANGING TIDES) OPENED UP OPPORTUNITIES for us, for GATHERING OYSTERS, an INVITATION THAT PULLS US INTO ACTION FOLLOWING WHICH PEOPLE WITH “BEING” BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES “CAPTURE” in the ONE-SIDED (EGO-INFLATING) MISTAKEN TERMS OF OUR LOCAL AUTHORING (NOT TRUE) OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS wherein, so we say, WE COLLECTED OYSTERS.

 

The FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING OPPORTUNIZING ASPECT IS DROPPED OUT OF OUR WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION OF WHAT GOES ON, MAKING IT SEEM AS IF WHAT HAPPENED HERE WAS THE RESULT OF A MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING INITIATIVE. MEANWHILE, the “TEASE” that NATURE was giving by “PULLING UP HER SKIRT TO EXPOSE HER GOODS” is NOT EVEN MENTIONED in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, making it “SOUND” as if OUR MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is the AUTHORING SOURCE of our OYSTER ACQUISITION.  This IMPOSES A PASSIVITY ON NATURE and a ONE-SIDED ACTION CAPABILITY to MAN, … the MAN who is NOT TALKING ABOUT HIS HAVING TO WAIT  ON NATURE UNTIL SHE WAS READY FOR THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTION.  Nature is innately ANDROGYNOUS and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE is, under natural circumstances, ALWAYS THE INSPIRATION that sets the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE in action.   NOTA BENE!  THESE CONJUGATES DO NOT EXIST SEPARATELY, they only occur in NATURE in their ANDROGYNOUS (CONJUGATE) FORM.  We know that INSPIRATION FILLS THE HEART while EGO SWELLS THE HEAD, so that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are MESSING THINGS UP when we ‘let EGO get split out of its ANDROGYNOUS conjugate relation with INSPIRATION’.   In indigenous aboriginal cultures, this DYSFUNCTIONAL SPLIT is what happens in WESTERN CULTURE THOUGHT AND LANGUAGE.  The SEPARATING OUT AND BANISHING OF THE FEMALE CONJUGATE is what happens in WESTERN CULTURE with the reduction of the CONJUGATE (which is not made of two separate parts) into two separate parts, accompanied by the DISCARDING OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate.   AI describes this ERROR as the source of EGO INFLATION and ANTHROPOCENTRISM as follows;

 

“Denying the implicit container as the “mother” cuts the psychological anchor to the whole. Without the grounding reality of a living, inclusive medium, the explicit ego inflates to fill the existential void. It claims primary authorship over its existence, leading to anthropocentrism and hyper-individualism.”   (i.e. a Donald Trump profile)

  (more…)