HOW LANGUAGE SHAPES OUR “REALITY”
0
Sharing this investigation is a tough one. It is like ripping up and replacing the scaffolding that one is at the same time working on. That’s how I feel as I use WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES to TEAR THEM DOWN while at the same time INTRODUCING MORE COMPETENT QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES. This is next to, but not quite as difficult as, BITING ONE’S OWN NOSE.
I’m not sure that I can successfully share in advance, in our standard BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC rhetoric, the different meaning that comes with QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC rhetoric, which is where I am going to. But I can share a view of the CHALLENGE involved. If I am successful you will come out of this brief two paragraph attempt to explain BINARY UNDERSTANDING relative to QUANTUM understanding, the difference pointing to how the indigenous aboriginals linguistic conceptualizing scheme serves up a sense of reality … versus how the WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing scheme impacts our WESTERN CULTURE sense of reality.
ARE YOU READY? HERE IT COMES!
When the rapist murderer returns from his escapade into the heart of the native community, the social collective, aware of what has happened, is gathered together to probe HOW THE COMMUNITY COULD HAVE ALLOWED TENSIONS IN THE SOCIAL-RELATIONAL WEB TO BUILD TO THE POINT THAT THIS VIOLENT TENSION-DRIVEN ACTION RESULTED. In indigenous aboriginal culture, as in MODERN PHYSICS, it is always the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT that is the source of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT so that there is NO POSSIBILITY of understanding and resolving the SOURCE of the VIOLENCE on the basis of the SIMPLE LOCAL and EXPLICIT PERPETRATOR-VICTIM MODEL when the origin is instead NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT so that the remedial action is to RESOLVE the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT (relational) TENSIONS in the social matrix that VENT through the individual ‘holding the smoking gun’ BUT IN NO WAY ORIGINATE from within that person.
The indigeous aboriginal community undestands that the person holding the smoking gun is the VENT for the release of TENSIONS that have been allowed to develop within the relational social matrix aka community, THEREFORE the needed REMEDY is by way of convening a HEALING CIRCLE to resolve those tensions and NOT to MIS-IDENTIFY the LOCAL, EXPLICIT “holder of the smoking gun” as the SOURCE of the violence when he/she is merely the CONDUIT for VENTING TENSIONS that develop and build within the relational matrix of community.
This is the QUANTUM LOGIC view. QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM which can be described by comparison to a WHORLING IN THE FLOWING of a stream or tidal current. There are WHORLINGS is the RELATIONAL SOCIAL DYNAMIC akin to the WHORLINGS we call HURRICANES, which are LOCAL, EXPLICIT “VENTS” for energy that is of a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT origin. Similarly, there is no point in seeking to ELIMINATE the LOCAL, EXPLICIT VENT of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) buildups of energy, nowever, that is exactly what WESTERN CULTURE PURIFICATIONIST JUSTICE does, based on the notion that the AUTHOR of VIOLENCE is an INDEPENDENT BEING, notionally with ITS OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS as it moves about and interacts in a NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE, and which MUST BE ELIMINATED if identified as the LOCAL AUTHOR of VIOLENT ACTIONS.
In the indigenous aboriginal understanding, which is affirmed also by MODERN PHYSICS, the SOURCING ENERGY is always NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) and there are no such things as BEINGS that can be given a BINARY LOGIC “BEING” based classification of EITHER good OR bad. In the indigenous aboriginal understanding EVERYTHING IS RELATED (the world is a relational web-of-life world that can be described as a WAVE-FIELD wherein CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD manifest as MATERIAL FORMS which are NOT separate and independent (NOT LOCAL and EXPLICIT) but CONDENSATIONS included in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD.
In the relational world view of the WAVE-FIELD, there are NO BEINGS which can be EITHER good OR bad but there are, as Heraclitus pointed out, RELATIONAL periods of LOVE and STRIFE as given by QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC which, being relational rather than BEING based, manifest as RESONANCE and DISSONANCE (there are no BINARY LOGIC LOCAL and EXPLICIT BEINGS that are EITHER good OR bad).
* * * * *
CONTINUING … HOW LANGUAGE SHAPES OUR “REALITY y.
To share an example of the difference in BINARY and QUANTUM LOGIC as it impacts within our WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing, … suppose we want to go from speaking in BINARY LOGIC terms such as the LOCAL and EXPLICIT “THE TOWN IS GROWING”, where we can speak in the LOCAL and EXPLICIT terms of the additions of streets and avenues and the construction of City Hall, police and fire stations and sports arenas, … to instead speaking in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT transforming of the VIRGIN LANDSCAPE wherein the WILDERNESS is SHRINKING in conjugate relation to the GROWTH of the TOWN.
NOTA BENE: When we begin with the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein we visualize the GROWING of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT TOWN, we see that the TOWNING is INCLUDED in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE as understood with the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.
BUT WESTERN CULTURE is NOT in the habit of PLAYING WITH A FULL DECK when it comes to LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING; i.e. there is a strong tendency to DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conceptualizing component and describe things in one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING terms such as THE TOWN IS GROWING… WITHOUT MENTIONING… the conjugate SHRINKING of WILDERNESS which TOGETHER with the GROWING of the TOWN imparts the understanding of the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE.
As WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, we have all seen and heard the LAND DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS which give short shrift to the CONJUGATE REDUCTION of WILDERNESS, and generally IGNORE the associated NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATION of the OVERALL LANDSCAPE.
This leads to PROBLEMS ON THE SCALE OF WESTERN CULTURE which are addressed in the TWO FOLLOWING NOTES which PIVOT from the current U.S. Election activity and associated thinking.
Here goes;
* * * * * * * * *
The world we live in is naturally caring on the ‘ground level’ and by this I mean WITHIN NATURAL FAMILIIES and friendly groups of people.
THEN THERE ARE THE ‘GOVERNING SYSTEMS’ and here things differ between WESTERN CULTURES and indigenous aboriginals.
MODERN PHYSICS agrees with indigenous aboriginal that everything is related (mitakuye oyasin) because material forms are condensations of the all-including energy-charged plenum (wave-field) in which material forms are condensations. This means that everything is related because all material forms are condensations of the all-including wave-field. This has been shown to be the case, .. BUT WAIT A MINUTE! OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE HAS BEEN BUILT WITH A BINARY LOGIC FOUNDATION where we impute INDEPENDENT BEING TO MATERIAL FORMS THAT WE ARE NOW SAYING “ARE ALL RELATED”, as just mentioned.
BINARY LOGIC is “A TOO SIMPLE ABSTRACTION” that is used to imply the INDEPENDENCE of relational forms in the transforming relational continuum (the overall energy-charged plenum populated by condensations). These relational forms ARE INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT as is the nature of condensations of the all-including wave-field in the wave-field, in the same sense that WHORLINGS in fluid FLOWING are INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT.
As individuals, we may FEEL this interconnection and interdependence, and if we were indigenous aboriginals, we would have a society and culture that ‘tries to behave’ according to this understanding, although people do quarrel. But at the bottom of it, the traditions of HEALING CIRCLES acknowledge that ALL THINGS ARE RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) in which case, indigenous aboriginals DO NOT ASSUME THAT THE PERSON WHO DOES THE STEALING, MURDERING and RAPING is the SOURCE of this violence, but instead assumes, that what is going on is RELATIONAL DISSONANCE that develops within the WEB-OF-LIFE aka the INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT relational matrix of ‘condensations’, aka people (two-leggeds) and other material condensation forms (four-leggeds, winged and crawly ones.
Our overall well-being depends on our respect and support for harmony and balance in this overall relational (interconnected and interdependent) reality, as is built into the customs of the indigenous aboriginals, and while there may be outbursts of relational dissonance which may be very violent and lethal, … the basic belief persists that ‘mitakuye oyasin’ … ‘we are all related’ so that the basic remedy is the RESTORING of relational resonance (resolving of relational dissonance) … AND NOT AS IN WESTERN CULTURE where the belief is in INDEPENDENT BEINGS, to ELIMINATE the BAD BEINGS SO THAT SOCIETY; I.E. THE COLLECTION OF INDEPENDENT BEINGS, WILL ACHIEVE PEACE through PURIFICATION where the traget to aim for is to retain ONLY GOOD BEINGS.
This BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACT GOAL is just that; INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION, and it is CRAZY to build a social dynamic on this BEING-based purificationist premise, but it is COMMON in WESTERN CULTURE because it has been the BELIEF propagated, together with less abstract, more sense-experience accordant things, by the three ABRAHAMIC RELIGIONS of JUDAISM, CHRISTIANITY and ISLAM. This is not a DEMONIZING of these religions because this review is coming from the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of MODERN PHYSICS and indigenous aboriginals which is RELATIONAL, where WE ARE ALL RELATED (Interconnected and interdependent as with condensations in the all-including energy-charged plenum aka wave-field) so that the orientation is to cultivating releational resonance rather than pursuing PURIFICATION as where where people are understood as a collection of INDEPENDENT BEINGS that may be EITHER good OR bad.
SO, THE CHALLENGE IS TO RESTORE RELATIONAL BALANCE AND HARMONY WHERE THERE ARE DEVELOPMENTS OF IMBALANCE AND RELATIONAL DISSONANCE; I.E. THE QUANTUM LOGIC ORIENTATION IS ALL ABOUT ‘RELATIONS’ as in MITAKUJYE OYASIN (“ALL MY RELATIONS” or “WE ARE ALL RELATED”).
WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC OBSCURING OF THE WAVE-FIELD NATURE OF REALITY
0FORWARD/OVERVIEW to: The Tricky Linguistics of Wave-Field PEAK and TROUGH
This STORY, TOLD DIRECTLY, is that we live in a WAVE-FIELD world which means that our LANGUAGE, in order to convey our ACTUAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE must be capable of conveying ANDROGYNOUS dynamics, wherein the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING agency and the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING recipient ARE ONLY ONE. This is describing the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the MALE ASSERTING is INCLUDED IN the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING, as in TRANSFORMATION.
ACHTUNG! NOTA BENE! WHERE WHESTERN CULTURE IS GOING WRONG in developing a LANGUAG HABIT (linguistic conceptualizing habit) which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate (i.e. the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM) by substituting ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE and KEEPING ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, as is the now popular WESTERN CULTURE language usage, which is equivalent to INVENTING A NEW ABSTRACT PSEUDO-REALITY based ON BINARY LOGIC wherin the PRIMARY physical phenomen;i.e. the WAVE-FIELD, is OBSCURED while in its place there remains ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate as if operating NOT AS A CONDENSATION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM but as a NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE, INDEPENDENT MATERIAL THING-IN-ITSELF moving and developing WITHIN A NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.
PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING PARAGRAPH CAREFULLY because what I have learned in my philosophical explorations into how we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are “SCREWING UP OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING”, is that while our sense-experience is of our living in a QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC world wherein material forms BOTH THEMSELVES AND AT THE SAME TIME, THEIR CONTAINING MEDIUM (e.g. consider a WHORLING in a FLOWING. In this sitation, ‘THE WHORLING IS THE FLOWING’; i.e. it is part of the APPEARANCE of flowing and THE WHORLING is “NOT” a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF, but only an ‘APPEARANCE’. That applies generally so that, for example, while there is HUMANING and TOWNING and FORESTING in the WAVE-FIELD (aka the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM), there are no LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES as are referred to as HUMANS, TOWNS and FORESTS, notionally with THEIR OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS such as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods.
This understanding of reality as an all-including energy-charged plenum bearing within it material condensations is the understanding of MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.
In this reality (Modern physics and Eastern/indigenous aboriginal reality), LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is FLOW-BASED and FLOW is QUANTUM LOGIC
wer have to describe the fact that the WAVE-FIELD energy is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and is PRIMARY while the LOCAL and EXPLICIT energy is APPEARANCE. We may give credit to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT for actions and development but that is only APPEARANCE (Scheumkommen) and real credit for actions and developmment is coming from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.
The LOCAL and EXPLICIT statement; “the men are constructing a village in the countryside ” makes NO MENTION of the REALITY of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS in which case the CONSTRUCTION OF THE VILLAGE “IS NOT REALITY” but is only APPEARANCE and if we ‘add back in’ the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS, we get the LESS SIMPLIFIED UNDERSTAND OF REALITY as the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE that includes “BOTH” the CONSTRUCTION of the VILLAGE “AND” the conjugate schrinking of WILDERNESS.
While the FLOW-BASED linguages of indigenous aboriginals and MODERN PHYSICS serves up LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which includes, in a TWO-IN-ONE sense, “BOTH” the GROWTH of the VILLAGE “AND” the onjugate SHRINKING of WILDERNESS which, taken together, are the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are in the habit of using a simplified form of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION that employ only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate and DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, substituting in its place, ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.
* * * * * * *
What I want to emphasize, because it tends to get LOST IN THE SHUFFLE, is that we cannot TRUST LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that treats WAVE-PEAK and WAVE-TROUGH as TWO SEPARATE THINGS which is what BINARY LOGIC allows us to do, and then we say that the WAVE-PEAK is PUSHING (asserting) and the WAVE-TROUGH is PULLING (accommodating) and after we do this, WESTERN CULTURE EGOTISTS will affirm that the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate “IS DOING ALL THE WORK” and we may as well DROP OUT MENTION of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate and simplify our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING by employ ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.
This is what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE NOW DOING, but as Nietzsche has pointed out, this is achieved with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR. This gives us a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING capability that supports FRAGMENTATION because ONCE ONE GETS RID OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, which BRINGS TO BEAR the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD ASPECT, we have unleashed a DUMBED DOWN LANGUAGE that is capable of producing FRAGMENTED perspectives which are LOCAL and EXPLICIT, as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINTITE SPACE.
The KEY THING HERE IS THAT THE GRAND SCREW-UP IN WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS is coming from the WESTERN CULTURE ABSTRACT, LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING where we (A) SPLIT UP the WAVE-FIELD into TWO SEPARATE PARTS; e.g. the PEAK and the TROUGH. This is NONSENSE because while the PEAK appears to be LOCAL and EXPLICIT, the TROUGH is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is NOT STAND-ALONE CONTENT but is CONTENT that must be INFORMED BY NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT RELATIONAL CONTEXT.
The DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, as pointed out by Nietzsche, is a recipe FRAGMENTATION in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING. We may say that the WAVE-PEAKS keep bashing the stranded boat against the reocks but it is the WAVE-TROUGH that keeps sucking it back in and setting it up from another WAVE-PEAK bashing.
WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are IMPRESSED by the WAVE-PEAK, the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and are employing LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING wherein we credit THE WAVE-PEAK with CRASHING INTO THE CROCKS as if it were legitimate to understanding such phenomena in one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALING ONLY TERMS; i.e. in LOCAL and EXPLICIT TERMS without taking into consideration the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT influence of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE. Linguistic conceptualization-wise, it is far simpler to STICK TO the LOCAL and EXPLICIT as if there was NO NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT INFLUENCE, thus while vionce in an indigenous aboriginal culture manifests, the entire community comes together in a HEALING CIRCLE sine the ASSUMPTION IS that the violence derives from the INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT social relational matrix in which case the INDIVDUAL HOLDING THE SMOKING GUN is the CONDUIT BUT VIOLENT ENERGY RELEASE but NOT THE SOURCE.
WESTERN CULTURE, by using LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING TO (A) EMPLOY NAMING to IDENTIFY A LOCAL AUTHOR and (B) EMPLOY GRAMMAR ‘ARM’ the NAMING-INSTANTIATED NOTIONAL ‘AUTHOR’, imputes a LOCAL AUTHORING SOURCE for everything. This LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that imputes LOCAL AUTHORING of events, must first EXPLAIN AWAY that everything is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT in nature (Which makes sense when we understand we are living in a relational matrix wherein EVERYTHING is INTERCONNECTED and INTERDEPENDENT.
show nietzsche quote on DOUBLE ERROR HERE.
& & & & 7
For those peoples or tribes whose languages ackowledge that we are living in a WAVE-FIELD, as indigenous aboriginals IN EFFECT acknowledge with their understandIng expressed by MITAKUYE OYASIN (everything is related) which is the QUANTUM LOGIC relation; i.e. the BOTH/AND logic of the including medium where SPACE is NOT EMPTY, IT IS FULL; i.e. it is the all-including WAVE-FIELD wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD. These CONDENSATIONS are, at the same time, BOTH themselves, material condensations AND, at the same time, the ENERGY-CHARGED-MEDIUM (aka WAVE-FIELD) they are included in. This QUANTUM LOGIC relation is exemplified by the WHORLING in the FLOWING in a stream or in the atmosphere; i.e. the WHORLING “APPEARS to be an INDEPENDENT THING but that is just APPEARANCE or as Schroedinger says ‘Schaumkommen’.
As Heraclitus said, and as reaffirmed by indigenous aboriginals, and by Nietzsche and Bohm, EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX. This is how it is when one lives in a WAVE-FIELD reality as we all do.
NOW COMES LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, and as Nietzsche pointed out, in our WESTERN CULTURE, EGO has progressively pushed the notion that HUMANS are INDEPENDENT BEING, notionally with their own POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, hence WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS identify individuals are LOCAL AUTHORS of particular material actions, development and production.
POST-SHAKESPEAREAN WESTERN CULTURE
The TRICKY LINGUISTICS of Wave-Field PEAK and TROUGH
The “WAVE-PEAK” is treated of in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING as a LOCAL and EXPLICIT “BEING” based influence. This is Schaumkommen (Appearance), that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE and THINKING “PORTRAYS” in a BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC sense as if THE “WAVE-PEAK” (there is no such thing in sense-experience reality as a “WAVE-PEAK” since WAVES DO NOT SPLIT into a PEAK and a TROUGH; i.e. the PEAK and TROUGH form is only ‘APPEARANCE’‘.
In using ‘APPEARANCE’ as the basis for LINGUISTIC DISCUSSION of WAVE-FIELD dynamics, we speak of a ‘WAVE’ as having BOTH a PEAK and a TROUGH and in WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing, we speak of a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENCY that is fully and solely responsible for LOCAL and EXPLICIT actions and development; e.g. ‘The waves crashed into the beached boat and demolished it.’ Though, in sense-experience affirmed actuality, the WAVE-TROUGH repetitively pulled the boat partly off the rocks before the WAVE-PEAK returned to hammer it into and onto the rocks, our standard WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing mentions ONLY the WAVE-PEAK action which is the BINARY LOGIC “LOCAL, EXPLICIT” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-PEAK ACTION.
The “WAVE-TROUGH” is something NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, which is A PURELY RELATIONAL influence that is without its own BEING, which, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE and THINKING is PORTRAYED in a SECONDARY LIGHT, as if it were the PASSIVE INTERVAL BETWEEN TWO ACTIVE PEAKS; i.e. as if the PEAKS were LOCAL, EXPLICIT, “INDEPENDENT” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENTS, while the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING TROUGHS WERE SECONDARY NON-CONTRIBUTING ‘FILLERS-IN’ like the SPANDREL in Cathedral architecture.
THE HUMONGOUS ERROR of WESTERN CULTURE is the DESIGNING of LANGUAGE that FALSELY PROMOTES THE “LOCAL AND EXPLICIT WAVE-PEAK TO PRIMARY ACTION SOURCING AGENT WHILE DROPPING OUT THE ACTUAL PRIMARY ACTION SOURCING AGENT; i.e THE “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-TROUGH.
The SPLITTING OUT of the WAVE-PEAK and setting it up ON ITS OWN, requires the ABSTRACT NULLING OUT of its WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, the WAVE-TROUGH, which is in reality, the PRIMARY AGENCY since the WAVE-FIELD is innately NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT while its LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING “DUMB-DOWN” to “LOCAL and EXPLICIT” is “APPEARANCE” based; i.e. THERE IS NOTHING LOCAL AND EXPLICIT ABOUT WAVE-FIELD PHENOMENA.
The terms NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT DESCRIBE THE BASIC NATURE OF THE WAVE-FIELD and the fact that WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS LIMIT OUR FOCUS to certain aspects of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) and use LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is supported by what Nietzsche has pointed out is a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, to come up with a reduction to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT does not mean that such SIMPLIFYING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING (e.g. BINARY LOGIC MATERIAL BEINGS IN EMPTY SPACE) is in accord with the QUANTUM LOGIC world of our SENSE EXPERIENCE (e.g. QUANTUM LOGIC CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM AKA WAVE-FIELD).
THE “LOCAL and EXPLICIT” PEAKS together with THE “NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT” TROUGH comprise the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC. The perceived MULTIPLICITY of LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘INDEPENDENT’ PEAKS are only APPEARANCE but have been given FOUNDATIONAL STATUS in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING practice, SHUTTING OUT the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TROUGH which is a LESS SIMPLE FOUNDATION WHEREIN ALL MATERIAL THINGS ARE RELATED BY VIRTUE OF ALL MATERIAL THINGS BEING CONDENSATIONS OF THE ONE, ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM AKA WAVE-FIELD.
TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE
INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL TRANSFORMATIONISM (NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) VS. WESTERN CULTURE CONSTRUCTIVISM (LOCAL and EXPLICIT)
0
INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL TRANSFORMATIONISM (NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) VS. WESTERN CULTURE CONSTRUCTIVISM (LOCAL and EXPLICIT)
Like Bohm, Nietzsche and Schroedinger, One can follow (and I have followed) the path of psycho-philosophical investigation that informs us that different varieties of language (linguistic conceptualization) are giving us different understandings of REALITY which in turn give rise to what we know and refer to as differing CULTURES. ‘Language and Culture Are Frameworks Through Which Humans Experience, Communicate and Understand Reality’ (Vygotsky, 1968)
The following aphorisms point to TWO CHOICES of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which “PUT US INSIDE OF TWO DIFFERENT REALITIES”.
“To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose”….’There is a tide in the affairs of men”. The former is from the Bible (Ecclesiastes 3:1-8) and the latter is from Shakepeare’s ‘Julius Caesar’.
If we AGREE with this proposition, we thus agree that we can NEVER CLAIM PERSONAL AUTHORSHIP OF ANYTHING due the fact that, stated in WAVE-FIELD terms the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is ALWAYS, to SOME EXTENT ONE WAY OR THE OTHER, EXPANDED or DIMINISHED by the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONDITIONS it is SITUATIONALLY INCLUDED IN. As FARMERS, FARMER ‘A’, may bring to harvest a BUMPER CROP and be celebrated for his skills and strong effort, and perhaps, his generosity and benevolent charity to ‘less productive’ members of the local community, while FARMER ‘B’ who skills and labors were equivalent to, or greater than FARMER ‘A’s, experienced crop failure due to hailstorms and flooding.
While our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME HAS US USING SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC TO STATE IN NO UNCERTAIN TERMS, FARMER “A” PRODUCED A BUMPER CROP, while FARMER “B” FAILED TO PRODUCE ANYTHING OF SUBSTANCE, and to CLAIM THESE PROPOSITIONS TO BE THE HONEST TRUTH. However, as Goedel’s Theorem affirms, ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS (though they may be provably TRUE) are INCOMPLETE. In this example, what was NEVER MENTIONED was the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the ambient dynamics which are CONJUGATE to the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING actions of the FARMER, BOTH of which are CONTRIBUTORS to the UNFOLDING REALITY.
In other words, WESTERN CULTURE employs a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which is SOLELY MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING BASED, WHICH ‘DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE” which is INHERENT in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD in which WE and our PROJECTS are INCLUDED. Farmer “A” found his crop-cultivating actions to be in harmonious relation with the ambient dynamics while Farmer “B” found his crop-cultivating actions to be in dissonant relation with the ambient dynamics, which is to remind ourselves of the Goedel’s Theorem INCOMPLETENESS of all FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS, and they are INCOMPLETE because “BINARY LOGIC” PROPOSITIONS consist ONLY of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING activity which comes by DROPPING OUT the natural WAVE-FIELD FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate.
Aphorisms such as ‘to everything there is a season’ EXPOSE AS “TOO SIMPLE” the common WESTERN CULTURE ONE SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY linguistic conceptualizing scheme based on the abstraction of MATERIAL BODIES moving about in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which portray human dynamics in BINARY LOGIC terms of EITHER ‘in motion’ OR ‘at rest’, FAILING TO ACKNOWLEDGE the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein MATTER is a CONDENSATION of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM such that MATERIAL FORMS are, as with WHORLINGS in FLOWING, “BOTH” themselves “AND” the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (WAVE-FIELD) they are CONDENSATIONS IN, WHERE “EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX” and where EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) by way of BEING CONDENSATIONS of the ONE, ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.
As David Bohm points out;
“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm
The WESTERN CULTURE Hijacking of Quantum Logic by Binary Logic
0
“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm
What this means is that“WE ARE ALL RELATED” (mitakuye oyasin) as with the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM where material “CONDENSATIONS -OF-THE-MEDIUM”, like WHORLINGS in the FLOWING, while having a DISTINGUISHING APPEARANCE, are INCLUDED FEATURES OF THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.
The indigenous aboriginal culture understands this QUANTUM LOGIC pattern in NATURE wherein ALL THINGS ARE RELATED, where there is no such thing as LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, as is basic in the BINARY LOGIC based linguistic conceptualizings of WESTERN CULTURE. In the aboriginal culture, the violent act is understood as having been cultivated in the relational social matrix so that the violent PERSON is seen as the CONDUIT through whom the tensions brewed in the social collective are vented. RESTORATIVE JUSTICE by means of the HEALING CIRCLE is the natural response to outbursts of violence rather than scapegoating the CONDUIT through which community-brewed tensions are vented.
BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC IS TOO SIMPLE A BASE FOR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC REALITY IN THAT BINARY LOGIC REQUIRES EMPTY SPACE AS ‘INSULATOR’ TO SUPPORT THE ABSTRACTION OF SEPARATE OBJECTS which WESTERN CULTURE makes out to be the LOCAL AUTHORS of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS (using the device of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR). This is in marked contrast to the QUANTUM PHYSICS and indigenous aboriginal ‘relational web-of-life’ understanding of actions and developments being of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational origin) and only LOCAL and EXPLICIT in APPEARANCE in the manner that SOLAR IRRADIANCE FIELDS which are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT are the primary source of LOCAL and EXPLICIT high pressure and low pressure circulations in the oceans and atmosphere,’
WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing, in spite of our sense-experience affirming that everything is in flux, employs the ‘DOUBLE ERROR” combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘push’ to the high pressure and FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ‘pull’ to the low pressure, thus providing a pseudo-explanation of these CONJUGATE WAVE-FIELD COMPONENTS in LOCAL, EXPLICIT terms. This tactic may be popularly affirmed by the ‘petitio principii of ‘does this low pressure suck?’ … and… ‘does this high pressure push’? The petitio pincipii error akin to Nietzsche’s example of ‘lightning flashes’ where the lightning IS THE flashing. Likewise, the low pressure IS THE sucking and the high pressure IS THE pushing. Meanwhile, the DOUBLE ERROR construct WRONGLY implies LOCAL AUTHORING which is a a work-around for the problem faced by linguistic conceptualizing challenge associated with capturing the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.
BINARY LOGIC itself is a simplifying ‘ruse’ that when applied to explain the WAVE-FIELD phenomena DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate which makes it incapable of capturing the QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD relation which is comprised of the conjugate relation of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING together with FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING. BINARY LOGIC’S “EITHER/OR” linguistic conceptualization CAN ONLY ‘HANDLE’ the LOCAL and EXPLICIT such as “IS THE TOWN GROWING?”. There is a problem here in that whether the reality and/or the answer is EITHER yes OR no, … this makes no mention of the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS and thus no mention of the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE. This suggests that the question “IS THE TOWN GROWING” is NOT about our sense-experience reality since what is going on according to our sense-experience reality is that ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.
Some may ARGUE that the simple BINARY LOGIC proposition (IS THE TOWN GROWING) and response is adequate but to an indigenous aboriginal who is likely to be sensitive to, and accustomed to speaking in the flow-based language terms, it is important NOT TO CONCEAL the reality that there is CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS together with GROWING OF THE TOWN. The CONSTRUCTION OF THE TOWN PART is only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate and this is standard in WESTERN CULTURE to DROP OUT mention of the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and this has been called the DEA ABSCONDITA (GODDESS IN HIDING) because the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate is the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM while the material CONDENSATION such as ‘the TOWN that is GROWING’ … IS NOT SOMETHING REAL, … IT IS ONLY APPEARANCE as is the case with all CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD. What is REAL is the CONTINUALLY TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.
BINARY LOGIC is something we apply to “THE TOWN” as in “THE TOWN IS EITHER LARGER THIS SUMMER THAN LAST SUMMER, or NOT”. SUCH A QUESTION DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE SO THAT IN USING BINARY LOGIC, WE ARE NOT ‘PLAYING WITH A FULL DECK’. We have the issue of the DEA ABSCONDITA (GODDESS IN HIDING).
WORSE THAN THIS! BY DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE we are DROPPING OUT THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD and PRETENDING THAT THE MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD, WHICH ARE ‘APPEARANCE’ only (THE WAVE-FIELD IS NON-VISIBLE) ARE THE OPERATIVE REALITY.
The “TOWN that is GROWING “is a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that suggests the presence of a LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF, notionall with ITS OWN POWERS of AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT. That is the WESTERN CULTURE view. In the indigenous aboriginal view as also the QUANTUM LOGIC view, what is going on is that we all share inclusion in the transforming relational continuum and in this case there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein everyting is in flux and there are no LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES such as ‘TOWNS’ that ‘GROW’ and ‘DEVELOP’ and ‘PRODUCE GOODS’; these are the products of DIFFERENTIATING the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).
The NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT provides CONTEXT for the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONTENT, but there is a problem here when BINARY LOGIC is employed since BINARY LOGIC is ONLY CAPABLE OF ADDRESSING THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT as in MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES SITUATED IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which means OUT OF THE CONTEXT OF THE CONJUGATE RELATION WITH THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE
THUS, THE POINT IS THAT BINARY LOGIC ACTS AS A FILTER THAT REMOVES LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING’S ACCESS TO THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE WHICH MEANS THAT BINARY LOGIC REMOVES ACCESS TO WAVE-FIELD BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION (BINARY LOGIC GIVES ACCESS ONLY TO MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING).
BECAUSE LINGUISTIC DISCOURSE CONSTRAINED BY BINARY LOGIC “DROPS OUT” THE CONTEXTUAL INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, THERE WILL BE DROP OUT OF THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT which is the CONTEXTUAL CONTAINER that ENRICHES understanding of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘CONTENT”.
AS WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, WE HAVE ACCESS TO SENSE-EXPERIENCE GROUNDING IN OUR UNDERSTANDING, but for those of us who place UNBALANCED DEPENDENCE on BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, there is NO SUPPORTING CONTEXTUAL GROUNDING and the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, which, on its own (without CONTEXTUAL ENRICHMENT from the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT), sources FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM in WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS.
* * *AUTHOR’S NOTE: The way I think of the above is that BINARY LOGIC, by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE that comes with QUANTUM LOGIC, brings in, instead, an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE which gives a FREE TICKET to MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DOMINANCE which means that linguistic conceptualizing (expressibility of thought and language) is LIMITED to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (what the TOWN is doing) while the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (transforming landscape influence) is DISABLED, but it is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE that enriches the understanding constrained by the limited reach of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT that is generated by the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate.* * *
* * * * * * * * *
The WESTERN CULTURE Hijacking of Quantum Logic by Binary Logic is the reason why we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are NOT on the ‘same page’ as indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, all of whom are, as David Point pointed out, in accord with QUANTUM PHYSICS.
WESTERN CULTURE is in serious trouble that is manifesting in FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTIST DROP-OUT built into our linguistic conceptualizing scheme. The FRAGMENTATION is coming from the use of NAMING to invent LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING/S and the OBSCURANTISM is coming from the use of GRAMMAR to impute one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING agency (e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’) which DROPS OUT the WAVE-FIELD conjugate of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING as in ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX as is the basic nature of the WAVE-FIELD. WESTERN CULTURE’s use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCTING GOODS’ is linguistic conceptualizing that implies the EXISTENCE of a MATERIAL BEING (‘the TOWN’) that has its own powers of GROWING).
The REALITY affirmed by our sense-experience is that ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ … where everything is in flux. There can be no ‘TOWN THAT IS GROWING’ without a CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, with both of these conjugates being aspects of the ONGOING, and ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is otherwise known the WAVE-FIELD. The MATERIAL FIGURE or “TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” is in a “QUANTUM BOTH/AND RELATION” where “THE TOWNING” is a CONDENSATION of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is “BOTH” its “LOCAL, EXPLICIT SELF”, … “AND”, … at the same time, the ALL-INCLUDING, NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD. This QUANTUM LOGIC “BOTH”/”AND” RELATION describes a relation such as a WHORLING in a FLOWING where there in only ONE dynamic entitity, the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD BUT THERE IS THE APPEARANCE of TWO; i.e. the WHORLING and the FLOWING which is just ONE since WHORLING is part of the APPEARANCE of FLOWING and we cannot ‘scoop out a WHORLING’ in a net and put it in a separate ‘holding tank’ because “IT” (the WHORLING) is APPEARANCE and is NOT a THING THAT EXISTS.
I am proceeding ‘carefully’ here as I compose my linguistic conceptualizations because what I am sharing here is a TRICKY MATTER that requires from us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS an OPEN MIND (so as not to be ‘held captive’ by our WESTERN CULTURE common linguistic conceptualizations that are erroneous but which we HABITUALLY employ on a routine basis in spite of their being ‘infected’ with errors.
The KEY POINT is that while our sense-experience is of INCLUSION IN THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is a WAVE-FIELD dynamic that requires QUANTUM LOGIC expression, our intellectual modeling and our simple BEING-based linguistic conceptualizations are SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based while QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS SIMPLE and requires a less simple lingiustic conceptualizing scheme. In particular, in the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of MODERN PHYSICS, which accords with the indigenous aboriginal linguistic conceptualizing scheme, EVERYTHING IS RELATED in the manner of CONDENSATIONS of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in the PLENUM wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX. This is why researchers such as Zen scholar Alan Watts recommends that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “DROP” our BEING-BASED LANGUAGE and adopt a FLOW-BASED (relational) LANGUAGE.
Moving Beyond Our Western Culture BINARY LOGIC World View
0
MOVING BEYOND OUR WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC WORLD VIEW
IS THERE A “NOBLE SAVAGE” IN US ALL THAT OUR BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE HAS REMOVED?
FIRST, …PRESENTATION OF EXPLANATORY TIPS FOR THE WESTERN CULTURE READER OF THIS ARTICLE:
If the reader is a WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT like myself, there is an important TIP that is helpful if brought to mind, to fully comprehend this message, which involves LIFTING our cognitive AWARENESS (as in the Erich Jantsch AWARENESS levels classification) from the lower levels (2 and 3) to level 1, … all of which is explained in this article, but which it may be helpful to briefly review UPFRONT.
Our WESTERN CULTURE AWARENESS is generally operating at the lower awaremess levels which are BOTH BINARY LOGIC based as with the CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL viewpoints. Examples of BINARY LOGIC are the “EITHER” innocent “OR” guilty determinations of the WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE SYSTEM, and the EITHER my ENTITLEMENT OR not my ENTITLEMENT, wherein an individual “EITHER” owns “OR does not own, certain rights and privileges.
INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL AWARENESS which is QUANTUM LOGIC BASED accepts this LESS SIMPLE “BOTH/AND” relation as with WHORLING in FLOWING where WHORLING is PART OF THE APPEARANCE of FLOWING and THERE IS NO ACTUAL LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THING-IN-ITSELF “WHORL”.
WESTERN CULTURE, ‘armed with’ NAMING and GRAMMAR based “LOCAL AUTHORING AGENTS” such as “WHORLS”, commonly CONSTRUCTS BINARY LOGIC BASED PSEUDO-REALITIES based on NAMING-INSTANTIATED, LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEINGS” (such as WHORLS), notionally with GRAMMAR-given powers of LOCAL AUTHORING.
So, at the SIMPLEST AWARENESS LEVELS we support the CONSERVATIVE (AWARENESS LEVEL3) MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING dynamic as in ‘the HURRICANE is STIRRING UP the ATMOSPHERE’, while at the next LESS SIMPLE AWARENESS LEVEL we support the LIBERAL (AWARENESS LEVEL 2) FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING dynamic as in ‘the ATMOSPHERE is STIRRING UP the HURRICANE’. AWARENESS LEVELS 3 and 2, the lower two levels, cultive POLARIZED OPPOSITION, which is RESOLVED in AWARENESS LEVEL 1, however while AWARENESS LEVELS 3 and 2 are accessible with BINARY LOGIC, LEVEL 1 AWARENESS is QUANTUM LOGIC based.
QUANTUM LOGIC vis-à-vis BINARY LOGIC
INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL JUSTICE is NON-BINARY in that there is NO ASSUMPTION that the person HOLDING THE SMOKING GUN is the LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHOR of a “CRIME” whether JACK THE RIPPER or DONALD TRUMP and this has NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SEVERITY OF THE ACTIONS AND EVENTS IN QUESTION, but rather to do with the precedence of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT. In MODERN PHYSICS also in INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL JUSTICE, emergent events are understood as being of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT origin, in which case the response to emergent VIOLENCE or SYSFUNCTION is the forming of a HEALING CIRCLE because the understanding is that when an INDIVIDUAL GOES BALLISTIC, the SOURCE is not in the INDIVIDUAL but in the web-of-relations in which the individual is a SINGLE STRAND. Indigenous aboriginal justice does NOT, therefore. seek REMEDIATION by ELIMINATING or INCARCERATING the ‘individual SMOKING GUN’ who is the CONDUIT for VENTING tensions cultivated within the relational matrix of society. The indigenous aboriginal JUSTICE convokes a HEALING CIRCLE in order to resolve the TENSIONS in the relational social matrix which source the VIOLENT VENTING that manifests through the ‘IDENTIFIED PATIENT’ or the ‘MINER’S CANARY’. This indigenous aboriginal understanding of TORT is that it belongs to the social relational collective and merely VENTS through an individual.
In the indigenous aboriginal and QUANTUM PHYSICS view, the LOGIC employed is QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM rather than simple BINARY LOGIC, the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM (i.e. the presumed EMPTY SPACE MEDIUM which constrains the AUTHORING of actions to the MATERIAL OCCUPANTS of the notional EMPTY SPACE). OUR OWN SENSE-EXPERIENCE INTUITION informs us, nevertheless, the WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE notion of INNOCENT UNLESS PROVEN GUILTY is a SMOKE-SCREEN for a DYSFUNCTIONAL ‘NORMALITY’; i.e. “What we call ‘normal’ (in our WESTERN CULTURE) is a product of repression, denial, splitting, projection, introjection and other forms of destructive action on experience.” — R.D. Laing
In other words, dysfunction within the dynamics of the social collective which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) is the source of LOCAL, EXPLICIT aberrant actions and developments, so that the REMEDY is to heal the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT tensions in the social relational matrix, which is what the HEALING CIRCLE is designed for. To MIS-IDENTIFY as the SOURCE, the LOCAL, EXPLICIT ‘VENTING AGENT’ through which tensions in the social relational matrix find manifest expression, is to absolve the social collective while SCAPE-GOATING the one holding the smoking gun. WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC JUSTICE MISINTERPRETS the LOCAL, EXPLICIT VENTING AGENT as the AUTHORING SOURCE when the reality is that the SOURCING is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) arising from tensions generated within the social relational matrix of community, in which case REMEDIATION is achievable through the QUANTUM LOGIC means of restoring balance by resolving relational tensions, rather than by BINARY LOGIC means of ELIMINATING or INCARCERATING the SMOKING GUN, WRONGLY IDENTIFIED as the AUTHORING SOURCE while only the VENT through which the build up of relational tension find expression.
The problem being stirred up by TRUMP is coming from the DYSFUNCTION that is inherent in the use of BINARY LOGIC based reasoning which can be split into CONFLICTING VARIANTS which are CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL, both of which are OVER-SIMPLIFIED and IN ERROR, being seeming alternative ways of explaining LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development, the CONVERVATIVES believing that the INDIVIDUAL is the ROOT SOURCE of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments and the LIBERALS believing that the SOCIAL COLLECTIVE is the ROOT SOURCE of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments. Whereas, indigenous aboriginals and QUANTUM LOGIC is affirming that THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING of EXPLICIT results, there is only TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC based). For example, there is TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, but THERE IS NO ‘TOWN’ THAT IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING things as if ‘in its own local authoring right, as in a BINARY LOGIC based PROPOSITION.
* * *
HITLER WAS RIGHT! (about one thing)
0
WESTERN CULTURE PEOPLE FALL FOR THE BIG LIES, and it is SO OBVIOUS that the WESTERN CULTURE ESTABLISHMENT, the whole matrix of TOP-DOWN ADMINISTRATIONS, is FALLING FOR THE LIE of “LOCAL AUTHORING” which comes from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR. HEY! LOCAL AUTHORING IS THE “BIG LIE” THAT IS THE ACCEPTED FOUNDATION OF WESTERN CULTURE.
No matter that Chief Seattle and the whole population of indigenous aboriginals tried to get us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS to WAKE UP from our MESMERIZATION by, as Nietzsche also pointed out was a LIE, the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based BELIEF IN ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’ that has been ENDORSED by the ABRAHAMIC RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS of Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING. IT IS A HUMONGOUS LIE that IS (MIS-) SHAPING WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMICS.AS IN THE BINARY LOGIC BASED SPLITTING OF PEOPLE INTO THE OPPOSITE CATEGORIES OF ‘GOOD’ and ‘EVIL’ based on the “DOUBLE ERROR” of NAMING and GRAMMAR that is the SOURCE of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.
This BIG LIE of “THE LOCAL AUTHOR” is ENFORCED in WESTERN CULTURE by a BINARY LOGIC based system of REWARDS and PUNISHMENTS which REWARDS the “PERCEIVED” AUTHORS OF “GOOD” actions and developments and PUNISHES the “PERCEIVED” AUTHORS of “BAD” actions and developments as part of a PURIFICATIONIST PROGRAM aimed at ensuring that GOOD prevails over BAD in ‘WESTERN CULTURE SOCIETY”.
THIS BIG LIE, where one is taught from childhood to BELIEVE that WE ARE “INDEPENDENT BEINGS” WITH OUR OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, a HUMONGOUS LIE which OBLIGES A FOLLOW-UP LIE whereby we notionally IMAGINE OURSELVES to be SITUATED WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, which means that that the ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS of the INDEPENDENT BEINGS that move about and interact within that space CAN ONLY BE ATTRIBUTED TO THE INDEPENDENT BEINGS.
HEY, NONE OF THIS FUZZINESS of the indigenous aboriginal cultures IS ALLOWED in our WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizings), where the belief is that ‘EVERYTHING is RELATED’ as is also supported by Modern Physics where all material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ONE, All-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD. NOT EVEN THE ‘SYSTEMS SCIENCE’ that has SUPPORTED the indigenous aboriginal understanding that WE SHARE INCLUSION in a world characterized by global interconnectedness an mutual interdependence … has been unable to ‘gain access to the microphone’ so that public transmissions continue to be DOMINATED by supporters of the BIG LIE of LOCAL AUTHORING.
ON AND ON GOES THE BIG LIE OF LOCAL AUTHORING, IMPERVIOUS TO THE CONTINUING DEBUNKING EFFORTS, which continue to BOUNCE OFF THE “BIG LIE”, LOCKED IN AS IT IS BY ‘HIGH SWITCHING COSTS’ including the WESTERN CULTURE LOCAL AUTHORING BASED SYSTEM OF REWARDS AND PUNISHMENTS, that put those who are MOST REWARDED as PROTECTORS of the WESTERN CULTURE “BIG LIE” of LOCAL AUTHORING and its COHORT, the ‘INDEPENDENT BEING’, which is a BINARY LOGIC based SOURCING AGENT that has been BUILT INTO the FOUNDATIONS of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE via DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LOCAL AUTHORING.
SO, HITLER WAS RIGHT! (about one thing), … that PEOPLE FALL FOR THE “BIG LIE” and what could be a MORE HUMONGOUS LIE than the the one being probagated in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC DISCOURSE every time w we speak in terms of the LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, as when we make statements like ‘the TOWN is GROWING’! NO! NO! NO!, … that is a HUMONGOUS LIE. What is actually going on does not involve a BEING thing (the TOWN) that is its own LOCAL AUTHORING source of GROWING, … what is actually going on is the BEING-LESS RELATIONAL TRANSFORMING OF THE ALL-INCLUDING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD, as in the indigenous aboriginal and SYTEMS SCIENCE understanding that WE SHARE INCLUSION in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence.
The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE GAME
0
The purported INDEPENDENCE of NATIONS is BULLSHIT, but recall the history of such POLITICAL CORRECTNESS PRESSURES as in the case of Giordano Bruno’s rebuke that ‘the Majority has no monopoly on the Truth’, in 1600, on being taken to be burned at the stake for the HERESY OF RELATIVITY, in the Campo dei Fiori near the Vatican in Rome.
DO I BELIEVE IN THE INDEPENDENCE OF THE UNITED STATES or any of the other “DECLARED TO BE INDEPENDENT NATIONS”?,… NO WAY! AM I GOING TO GET ON A SOAPBOX IN TIMES SQUARE WITH A BULLHORN and GO ON A RANT ABOUT THE INSANITY OF BELIEVING THAT PEOPLE AND NATIONS ARE INDEPENDENT?
As far as I can see, the descendants of the VATICAN “burning at the stake” VICE SQUAD have been ‘reborn’ in an ecumenical wink wink, nod nod, ‘know what I mean’ volunteer vigilante clean-up group aka WESTERN CULTURE SOCIETY.
Re The BULLSHIT GAME we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “FORCE EACH OTHER (AND OUR CHILDREN) TO PLAY” WITH LANGUAGE
Here we go, … Ronald Laing, Jules Henry, Ernest Becker and David Bohm are being OPEN AND HONEST about WESTERN CULTURE, which is, to put it mildly, RARE in our common WESTERN CULTURE discourse.
A POCKET REFERENCE to WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC SCREW-UPS
0
INTRODUCTION (the POCKET REFERENCE follows the INTRODUCTION)
PART ONE: THE PROBLEM OF LANGUAGE-SOURCED BEHAVIOURAL (ABERRANT-) ‘NORMALITY’
Almost no-one is going to carry around with them reminders such as David Bohm’s, as to how our common WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing is SCREWING up our UNDERSTANDING of REALITY (the reality of our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum). Meanwhile, many philosophical investigators have come to the same conclusion; i.e. that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES, including ENGLISH are screwing up our understanding of reality. Wittgenstein, for example, observes;
Die Philosophie ist ein Kampf gegen die Verhexung unsres Verstandes durch die Mittel unserer Sprache” (Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of our language.)” – Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations
On the same tack, Psychiatrist R.D. Laing has written at length about how WESTERN CULTURE and its language is DRIVING US CRAZY;
What we call ‘normal’ is a product of repression, denial, splitting, projection, introjection and other forms of destructive action on experience.” — R.D. Laing
This is ALSO what Bohm is talking about in his treatise on FRAGMENTATION. What Bohm is describing is a WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC wherein the conditions considered NORMAL are growing INCREASINGLY TOXIC. This was also the finding of psychiatrist Laing in “The Divided Self”, and also the finding of anthropologist Jules Henry in “Culture Against Man”, and also the finding of Ernest Becker expressed in ‘the “Denial of Death”. This ‘screw-up’ is tied to our WESTERN CULTURE and what Benjamin Whorf classifies as Common Average European Language. All of these psychiatrists, and anthropologists have homed in on the fact that WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE PROBLEMS STEMMING FROM THE ARCHITECTURE OF OUR LANGUAGE. SHARING WHAT THESE PROBLEMS IN OUR LANGUAGE ARE, BY MEANS OF THE VERY SAME LANGUAGE THAT HAS THE PROBLEMS, IS TRICKY, LIKE TRYING TO BITE YOUR OWN NOSE. CLARIFYING what is going on here is the aim of this, “A POCKET REFERENCE to WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC SCREW-UPS”. If we were speaking Ojibwa, or any of the flow-based languages, we would NOT be having this problem that Laing and the others are drawing to our attention. Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE PROBLEM is coming from our building our language on the basis of BEING rather than on the basis of RELATIONS.
EXAMPLE of the TYPE OF PROBLEM that our BEING based language generates for us. We know from our sense-experience that there is a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING aspect to our reality which means that LANGUAGE that employs ONLY MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING propositions is MISSING SOMETHING (sometimes termed the DEA ABSCONDITA, “THE GODDESS IN HIDING”). From the point of view of one who studies the MODERN PHYSICS WAVE-FIELD based structure of this world of our sense-experience, THIS MAKES SENSE because our Euroepan languages, such as this ENGLISH I am now using, DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate. For example, in WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE, the damage done by a skull-fracturing punch to someone’s head is considered to be FULLY and SOLELY AUTHORED by the thrower of the punch. This ignores the ever-present FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE wherein the skull may an EGG-SHELL skull whose FRACTURING is due to BOTH the force of the “MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING” conjugate AND TO the “FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING” of a fragile ‘eggshell skull’.
Here’s HOW WESTERN CULTURE is CULTIVATING DEEPENING DYSFUNCTION
0
OVERVIEW: The challenge of sharing our complex experience of living in a transforming relational continuum also known as “The Tao that cannot be told” (Lao Tzu), has led to the development of “LANGUAGE”, more appropriately termed “LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING” to avoid the confusion that comes with the assumption that LANGUAGE is directly reporting on our sense-experience reality… IT IS NOT! Language or “LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING” comes with the issue noted by Korzybski that ‘the word is not the thing’ which is further complicated since as MODERN PHYSICS informs us, we share inclusion in a WAVE-FIELD wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD. This ambiguous matter/field relation gives rise to the need for QUANTUM LOGIC in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING. QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of THE INCLUDING MEDIUM which takes into account the interconnected and interdependent (relational) nature of material forms as CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD. The cultures of EAST and WEST can be distinguished by the EAST’s use of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is QUANTUM LOGIC or FLOW-BASED (relational) as contrasts with the WEST’s use of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that is BINARY LOGIC or BEING-based. This essay serves a ROSETTA STONE role in reviewing how the WEST’s adoption of a BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme is the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM that is NOT PRESENT in the QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme of the“EAST” (indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, as well as QUANTUM PHYSICS).
* * *
FORWARD: WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE comes with the potential for psychological confusion because it incorporatates a TOO SIMPLE, LOGICALLY INCOMPLETE “BEING-BASED linguistic conceptualizing scheme that Nietzsche has termed ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR. This ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ gives us the impression of MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “LOCAL AUTHORING” without acknowledging the real-world conjugate of FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING. Only in an imaginary abstract flat space of infinite extent would the one-sided “male-asserting/actualizing” pseudo-dynamics of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION be possible. In the sense-experience affirmed, all-including, continually transforming wave-field, the “male asserting/actualizing” of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION is only found in conjugate relation with the “female-accommodating/enabling’ dynamics of SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION, co-constituting together the all-including wave-field dynamic of TRANSFORMATION.
While philosophers such as Mircea Eliade (Mephistopheles et l’Androgyne) and systems theorists such as Kenneth Boulding have pointed to the confusion in WESTERN CULTURE associated with how our linguistic conceptualizing handles “THE TWO AND THE ONE” (the English title of the aforementioned book by Eliade). The standard BEING-based languages of Western culture are simple BINARY LOGIC based while the languages of indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta, in accord with MODERN PHYSICS, employ a less simple but more comprehensive QUANTUM LOGIC FLOW-based linguistic conceptualizing scheme. The BEING based linguistic conceptualizing is dependent on an abstract ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE as an ‘operating theatre’ for dynamics that are imagined in the simple BINARY LOGIC terms of the movements and interactions of independent material bodies as if within an empty infinite space. The FLOW based linguistic conceptualizing is dependent on RELATIONS as describe a NON-BEING-DEPENDENT transforming wave-field comprised of the QUANTUM LOGIC combination of wave-field and material forms that are condensations of the wave-field where the field and the condensations of the field manifest in a BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM (QUANTUM LOGIC) relation.
The QUANTUM LOGIC understanding requires a linguistic conceptualizing scheme that captures the BOTH/AND relation between “BOTH” material forms (condensations of the all-including energy-charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD) … “AND” the energy charged PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD. This QUANTUM LOGIC has an ANDROGYNOUS structure in that its “BOTH/AND’ capability acknowledges the ANDROGYNOUS (conjugate) combination of the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING dynamic and the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING dynamic. This means that GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION “DO NOT EXIST ON THEIR OWN” but are only found in conjugate relation with their”female-accommodating/enabling” “counterpart” dynamics of SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION, the combination, rather than a mechanical sum-of-the-parts, being found in the sense-experience affirmed all-including wave-field dynamic of TRANSFORMATION.
WE KNOW THAT we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ a linguistic conceptualizing scheme that FLATLY “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and ‘goes with’ ONLY the MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, hence we speak in terms of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION as if these dynamics WERE REAL when they are ABSTRACTIONS that are MISSING their FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugates of SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION which together with GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION co-constitute TRANSFORMATION.
Our sense-experience affirms that we are immersed in an all-including WAVE-FIELD based TRANSFORMATION, while our WESTERN CULTURE employs the tactic of using the simplified BINARY LOGIC based MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING pseudo-realities of GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, which are only half the story. But, as Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS, our propositions involving GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION can be “TRUE” without being “REAL” due to their INCOMPLETENESS wherein, as mentioned, they DROP OUT (or fail to acknowledge) the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugates of SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION, and it is only when we use LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING in a manner that would have us understand these MALE and FEMALE conjugates in their ANDROGYNOUS UNION of TRANSFORMATION that our LANGUAGE-INFORMED UNDERSTANDING has a chance of ‘matching up with’ our SENSE-EXPERIENCE UNDERSTANDING.
As it is, in WESTERN CULTURE, we have engineered ECONOMIES based ONE-SIDEDLY on THE UNREAL, ABSTRACTIONS OF GROWTH/DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, the TRUTH of which is convincing, without alerting us to the Goedel’s Theorem INCOMPLETENESS of such ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS, which, TRUE though they may be, are nevertheless INCOMPLETE and thus fail in their linguistic conceptualizing, to inform us on REALITY, that REALITY being an all-including TRANSFORMATION which incorporates the conjugates of SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION together with GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION.
Our WESTERN CULTURE USE OF BINARY LOGIC and the simplified abstract “LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS” that such simple logic supports, distinguishes us from CULTURES USING QUANTUM LOGIC such as INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURES, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VENDANT ADHERENTS and the small minority of QUANTUM PHYSICISTS who have ‘switched teams’ (from the BINARY LOGIC, abstract being-based pseudo-reality-grounded team to the QUANTUM LOGIC sense-experience-grounded team). While some fractions of the aforementioned QUANTUM LOGIC user-groups have ‘converted’ to the BINARY LOGIC based understandings that are built into WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizing, there continue to be holdouts; i.e. those who have managed to sustain their FLOW-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING practice.
This lengthy FORWARD is ‘made lengthy’ beause it is written in ENGLISH and ENGLISH is one of the “Common Average European” languages, in linguist Benjamin Whorf’s categorization, that suffers from BINARY LOGIC based DUMBING DOWN by way of the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate. That is, languages such as ENGLISH give a foundational role to BINARY LOGIC by way of simple LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, which Goedel’s Theorem “WARNS US” is “INCOMPLETE”, and we can easily see what is INCOMPLETE about it; i.e. it DOES NOT MENTION THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS and thus OBSCURES in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, the LESS SIMPLE reality of TRANSFORMATION which comes to us with the conjugate combination of “BOTH” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as with GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION … “AND” … FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING” as with SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION.
As Whorf points out, we would have no problem with our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING if we were using a QUANTUM LOGIC capable language like HOPI, but our use of ENGLISH with its BINARY LOGIC, BEING-based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING “IS” a problem. As Zen philosopher Alan Watts suggested, we users of English could avoid the BINARY LOGIC based DUMBING DOWN (from QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC) by avoiding the use of NOUNS signifying BEING and instead using only VERBS as support understanding in RELATIONAL (QUANTUM LOGIC) terms.
THIS HASN’T HAPPENED AND IS UNLIKELY TO HAPPEN SOON because we have secured with PRIDE the foundational status of NAMES/NOUNS with, as Nietzsche points out, the associated DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that supports the abstraction of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments which is solidly entrenched in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING and is the basis for WESTERN CULTURE’S BEING based PURIFICATIONIST systems of REWARDS for GOOD BEINGS and PUNISHMENTS for BAD BEINGS. This BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme is in radical contrast to the ‘mitakuye oyasin’ (we are all related) QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM understanding of indigenous aboriginal cultures. The QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC linguistic conceptualizing approach is reaffirmed by MODERN PHYSICS, wherein our INCLUSION in the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD is LINGUISTICALLY ACKNOWLEDGED as in flow-based linguistic conceptualizations such as ‘THERE IS TOWNING AND HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” where material forms are understood as CONDENSATIONS of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX.
The DYSFUNCTION that is intensifying in our WESTERN CULTURE social dynamic is shaped by linguistic conceptualizing that is DUMBED DOWN from needed less-simple QUANTUM LOGIC, WAVE-FIELD competent linguistic conceptualizing, to simple BINARY LOGIC MECHANICS (material-objects-banging-about-in-empty-space linguistic conceptualizing). This simplistic BINARY LOGIC conceptualizing DROPS OUT acknowledgement of the conjugate SHRINKING, DEGENERATION and CONSUMPTION that work together with GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION in the TRANSFORMING of the RELATIONAL CONTINUUM of our sense-experience.
In spite of the WARNINGS of Nietzsche, Bohm, Schroedinger and others as to how our WESTERN CULTURE over-simplistic LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is the source of rising FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM, we continue to move forward down a path of intensifying BINARY LOGIC fuelled DYSFUNCTION, punctuated with MASS SHOOTINGS and MILITARY CONFLICTS that, instead of having a QUANTUM LOGIC orientation to resolving RELATIONAL IMBALANCE, have a BINARY LOGIC orientation to BEING-BASED PURIFICATIONISM.
* * *
The SHORTFALL in BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING which we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS PERSIST IN USING, is CLEARLY IDENTIFIED by Nietzsche, in his following two comments that ‘set the stage’ for the need to UPGRADE to QUANTUM LOGIC BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING which is FLOW-BASED (NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT) and is NOT DEPENDENT on (LOCAL, EXPLICIT) MATERIAL BEINGS and, DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based “LOCAL AUTHORING”. In Nietzsche’s following two comments, he rejects the notion of BOTH “BEING” and “BEING-based LOCAL AUTHORING”.
In its origin language belongs in the age of the most rudimentary form of psychology. We enter a realm of crude fetishism when we summon before consciousness the basic presuppositions of the metaphysics of language, in plain talk, the presuppositions of reason. Everywhere it sees a doer and doing; it believes in will as the cause; it believes in the ego, in the ego as being, in the ego as substance, and it projects this faith in the ego-substance upon all things — only thereby does it first create the concept of “thing.” Everywhere “being” is projected by thought, pushed underneath, as the cause; the concept of being follows, and is a derivative of, the concept of ego. In the beginning there is that great calamity of an error that the will is something which is effective, that will is a faculty. Today we know that it is only a word.” – Nietzsche, ‘Twilight of the Idols’
Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531
Note that Nietzsche is CRITIQUING both the use of NAMING to impute BEING (e.g. “lightning”) as the SUPPORT STUB for CONTRIVING BEING-based AUTHORING; … Everywhere “being” is projected by thought, pushed underneath, as the cause …
Nietzsche’s exposing of this major SHORTFALL in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING (an engineered-in dependency on BINARY LOGIC based BEING and its GRAMMAR based cohort “LOCAL AUTHORING”). which conflicts with the WAVE-FIELD view of reality wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED AS CONDENSATIONS WITHIN AN ALL-INCLUIDING FLUX. Nietzsche agrees with Heraclitus’ that “EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX” and holds a QUANTUM LOGIC-like view of the world as ‘ENERGY-CHARGED-PLENUM’; “And do you know what “the world” is to me? Shall I show it to you in my mirror? This world: a monster of energy, without beginning, without end, a firm, iron magnitude of force that does not grow bigger or smaller, that does not expend itself but only transforms itself “ —Nietzsche, “The Will to Power”
Thus, Nietzsche makes an important critique of the WESTERN CULTURE “BEING-BASED” linguistic conceptualizing scheme. Today, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS continue to give BEING a foundational role in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme in spite of its REJECTION BY Heraclitus, and as is also evident, by Nietzsche and MODERN PHYSICS.
* * * * *
Here’s HOW WESTERN CULTURE is CULTIVATING DEEPENING DYSFUNCTION
By ‘Deepening Dysfunction’, I am referring to unfolding events such as HAMAS’ INSANE MASSACRE of Israelis and Netanyahu’s “INSANE” RESPONSE.
CHERCHEZ LA FEMME
0CHERCHEZ LA FEMME
ABOUT THE TITLE: ….We live in a WAVE-FIELD WORLD, the PRIMARY SUBSTANCE of which is the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, which, like the Electromagnetic Field, is NOT DIRECTLY VISIBLE but IMPLIED by what APPEARS to be OPEN SPACE “BETWEEN” the MATERIAL FORMS which are CONDENSATIONS of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.
[[NOTA BENE: Here’s where the SPLIT comes in where “EAST IS EAST and WEST IS WEST AND NEVER THE TWAIN SHALL MEET”, since the “EAST” which includes indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents understanding of reality where EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) while the WEST’s understanding that ALL MATERIAL FORMS ARE INDEPENDENT and move about within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT.]]
What is going on here is that the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM and its TRANSFORMING is the BASIC REALITY and the MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS are SECONDARY ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ (APPEARANCES) as Schroedinger terms them (they are like WHORLINGS in FLUID FLOWING; i.e. visible features of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FLOWING that appear to possess LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘MATERIAL BEING’ which is NOT TRUE).
Not only can we NOT IGNORE the TRANSPARENT BODY OF THE WAVE-FIELD and cast it as EMPTINESS in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, our sense-experience compels us to understand the TRANSPARENT WAVE-FIELD as the PRIMARY REALITY. This means that we must RESIST the tendency to, for example, conceive of the man leaving the town for the countryside since “it is no long the same town”, …and, “the man is no longer the same man”, and the “countryside is no longer the same countryside” since “everything is in the flux of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.
What is going on here is that while material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME INVERTS OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY, and in the process, SYNTHETICALLY and MISTAKENLY PROMOTES the SECONDARY MATERIAL FORMS which are CONDENSATIONS of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM to PRIMARY (PSEUDO-REALITY) STATUS in the guise of INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEINGS situated within, and moving about and interacting in, … A NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE..
YET, in the understanding coming from our PRE-LINGUAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, wherein all material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, “EVERYTHING IS RELATED” (mitakuye oyasin). However, after we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ the tool of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, which in our case is BINARY LOGIC BASED, we come up with an INTELLECTUAL LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION wherein material forms are NO LONGER “SEEN/UNDERSTOOD” as RELATED. This SPLITTING APART of the MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS IN THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM comes about where BINARY LOGIC is used to DIFFERENTIATE the multiple, innately related CONDENSATIONS OF THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, using LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to “pop them out” as if they were INDEPENDENT MATERIAL ENTITIES moving about and interacting within a NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT.
What happened to the “EVERYTHING IS RELATED” SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED reality wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including, all-connecting ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM?
The INTEGRATED REALITY of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM that includes MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS, … IS FRAGMENTED BY LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION USING WHAT NIETZSCHE CALLS “THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR”, as where NAMING is used to impute LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING, a FIRST ERROR that is CONFLATED with a SECOND ERROR of GRAMMAR that imputes to the NAMING-INSTANTIATED MATERIAL BEINGS, THEIR OWN GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.
In the SENSE-EXPERIENCE SUPPORTED REALITY WHEREIN MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS OF THE ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM WHEREIN EVERYTHING IS IN TRANSFORMATIVE FLUX, … “ONE CAN’T STEP INTO THE SAME RIVER TWICE because it is NOT THE SAME RIVER and NOT the SAME MAN STEPPING INTO IT. In other words, ALL MATERIAL THINGS are CONDENSATIONS in the ONE, ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is undergoing CONTINUING TRANSFORMATION as is the nature of the WAVE-FIELD.
The FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM which is rife in the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC derives from the MISTAKEN INTELLECTUAL, BINARY LOGIC REDUCTION to LOCAL, EXPLICIT INDEPENDENT BEING-BASED PARTS, of what our sense-experience is informing us NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT (relational) MATERIAL FORMINGS in the TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD. This FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM is the product of WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION. It supports UNREAL SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS THAT HAVE BECOME the POPULAR WESTERN CULTURE OPERATIVE. Thus, while people support the GROWTH OF THE TOWN, … there is NO MENTION OF THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, an OBFUSCATION that is leading to increasing unintended FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.
* * * * * *
In order to understand MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING behaviors, one needs to understand the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ambiance in which the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is transpiring in. In other words, in order to understand what is ‘going on’, … CHERCHEZ LA FEMME.
This applies in MODERN PHYSICS because WE LIVE IN A WAVE-FIELD WORLD where there is NOT ONLY a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “PUSH” but also, in conjugate relation, a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING “PULL”. This ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD REALITY is something that is ACKOWLEDGED in indigenous aboriginal, LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES but NOT in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES, and this is the reason for the title CHERCHEZ LA FEMME, because although the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING INFLUENCE is the PRIMARY INFLUENCE that is shaping our WORLD DYNAMIC, our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS are DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING conjugate, making it LOOK LIKE (in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING) the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “PUSH” is “ALL THERE IS”.
In WESTERN JUSTICE, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the EGGSHELL SKULL that collapses in association with the blow from a FEEBLE PUNCH, is IGNORED because in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, because it is BINARY LOGIC based, all we have in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME to explain the shattering of the EGGSHELL SKULL is the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “PUSH” of the PUNCH whereas, by contrast, in INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING WHICH IS FLOW-BASED, the OPERATIVE LOGIC is QUANTUM LOGIC which is LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC.
QUANTUM LOGIC is the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM wherein MATERIAL FORMS are understood as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD whereby CHERCHEZ LA FEMME makes total sense because in this QUANTUM LOGIC mode of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM is “PRIMARY” while the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is “SCHAUMKOMMEN” (Schroedinger) aka “APPEARANCE”.
CHERCHEZ LA FEMME (look for the NONLOCAL FEMALE INFLUENCE) is NOT ONLY ABOUT the dynamics associated with MALE-FEMALE RELATIONSHIPS in our HUMAN SOCIAL DYNAMICS, but this is CHARACTERISTIC of our WAVE-FIELD REALITY in GENERAL. In the WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, we employ ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE and simply DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD, SUBSTITUTING IN ITS PLACE “ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE” so that all our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME has to ‘take care of’ is the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate; For example, we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which is the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate “WITHOUT MENTIONING” the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS so that there is NO WAY, in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUJISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, TO CONVEY the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC which is the basis of TRANSFORMATION.
TRANSFORMATION is what is going on where the GROWTH OF THE TOWN associates with the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS within the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.
WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE “SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS” and IN ITS PLACE SUBSTITUTES ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE so as to simplify the task of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, as if the only thing that is happening is that the TOWN is GROWING… FULL STOP…
CHERCHEZ LA FEMME! … because while we can use LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING to do ALL THE SIMPLIFYING WE WANT, .. it so happens that we OPEN UP AN INCREASING GAP BETWEEN our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING and our SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY, so that, for example by our FAILING TO MENTION THE “MISSING FEMALE” i.e. the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING “OPENING UP” to enable the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWTH OF THE TOWN, we truly do LET LOOSE the DEA ABSCONDITA, the missing FEMALE (goddess) and it is the FEMALE conjugate that is PRIMARY in WAVE-FIELD physics while the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENT is Schaumkommen (APPEARANCE) in which case what our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME IS DOING IS CONSTRUCTING A PSEUDO-REALITY BASED SOLELY ON MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as in this example where we speak in the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING terms of ‘the TOWN GROWING’ without mentioning the REAL, SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED “CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS” and leaving the FALSE IMPRESSION that ALL WE NEED TO ACKNOWLEDGE IN OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALZING IS THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.
THIS IS A BIG MISTAKE AND THIS IS WHAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE DOING AND THIS IS WHERE THE FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM in our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC IS COMING FROM and CONTINUES TO SCREW US UP (the latest is the BINARY LOGIC SPLIT between ISRAELIS and PALESTINIANS and then again between RUSSIANS and UKRAINIANS) where there is no sign of acknowledgement that NAMING-INSTANTIATED “BEING” IS INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION and that WE and EVERYTHING are RELATEED as in the indigenous aboriginal aphorism MITAKUYE OYASIN, which is supported by the Modern physics understanding wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the all including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.
The BIG MISTAKE is in the BANISHING by way of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE which is made easy because “SHE” is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as is the nature of the ‘WAVE-FIELD’ which is the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY PLENUM wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS.
The SIMPLEST (but not the most trouble-free) MEANS of devising A LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME given this physical reality wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the energy-charged PLENUM is to SUBSTITUTE EMPTY SPACE for the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which case there can be a focus on the MATERIAL FORMS and THEIR MOVEMENTS relative so a FIXED REFERENCE FRAME so that EACH MATERIAL FORM can be seen as HAVING ITS OWN MOVEMENT and DEVELOPMENT, … the alternative that honors the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM forcing the development of MUCH LESS SIMPLE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION SCHEME wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (to honor the understanding that material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD.
OK, so we have wrestled that one to the ground, and it is clear that when we adopt the SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME where we only have to address the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate as if this action was transpiring in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, we are ALL SET to speak in such terms as ‘the TOWN IS GROWING (it is now in an absolute empty space that simplifies our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING by letting us DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.
PROBLEM! The CHERCHEZ LA FEMME PROBLEM, … the female seductive instigator of actions and development is INVISIBLE (it is the WAVE-FIELD which we are dropping out all mention of by substituting absolute empty space for it in our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME and going SOLELY with LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALZING THAT IS IN “ONE-SIDED” terms of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING MATERIAL FORMS, notionally operating within an absolute empty space of infinite extent.
YES, IT IS TRUE THAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS IN OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME ARE GIVING FULL AND SOLE CREDIT FOR ‘REALITY’ TO THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and BACKFILLING THE HOLE WITH ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.
By DROPPING OUT the ENERGY-ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS and SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE for the PLANEUM and TRANSFERRING ALL MOTIVE AUTHORING to the SECONDARY ‘CONDENSATION’, thus promoting the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENT to PRIMARY AUTHORING AGENCY, so that we NO LONGER HAVE ACTUALIZING CAPABILITY THAT IS FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLIN, PUTTING OURSELVES IN THE SITUATION WHEREIN OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING IS ‘MORE SIMPLE’ but ‘LESS TRUE’, … and now for the COMPLAINTS of this WESTERN CULTURE “DUMBED DOWN” LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.
* * * * * * * * * *
THE COMPLAINTS DEPARTMENT HAS RECEIVED THE FOLLOWING COMPLAINTS IN REGARD TO THE DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE
CHERCHEZ LA FEMME COMPLAINT # 1 coming from Johannes Kepler who acknowledges both the convenience of the simplification (dropping out the female accommodating/enabling conjugate), and also the SCREWING UP when we OVERLOOK the consequences of having made it.
As regards the academies, they are established in order to regulate the studies of the pupils and are concerned not to have the program of teaching change very often: in such places, because it is a question of the progress of the students, it frequently happens that the things which have to be chosen are not those which are most true but those which are most easy. And by that division in things which makes different people form different judgements, it so happens that certain people are in error contrary to their own opinion.” – Johannes Kepler, ‘Harmonies of the World’
While Kepler went to great pains to capture the HARMONIES OF THE WORLD in planetary motion in his master work by that name (Harmonies of the World), he was bothered by the common habit of DUMBING down, in the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, the harmonic complexity in nature’s dynamics. Kepler did not limit the movements of the planets to that of MATERIAL BODIES in EMPTY SPACE as in a BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION but allowed for FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING co-authoring influence. In the excerpt, he is making note of how the movement of the ferry is not pure MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING MOTION but is tapping into the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING “AETHER” (the energy-charged PLENUM).
On broader rivers they [Ferrymen] make the skiffs go in circles, send them hither and thither, and play a thousand tricks, without touching the bottom or the banks, but by the use of the oar alone, directing the unified and most simple flow of the river to their own ends. In very much the same manner, the power moving out into the world through the species is a kind of rapid torrent, which sweeps along all the planets, as well as, perhaps, the entire aethereal air, from west to east.” – Kepler, Astronomia Nova, 1609
This COMPLAINT #1 is essentially saying that our WESTERN CULTURE habit of reducing our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS to a SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC basis, while it makes for simple LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, is DROPPING OUT RELEVANT UNDERSTANDING with the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ENABLING influence.
* * * * * * * *
CHERCHEZ LA FEMME COMPLAINT NUMBER #2 coming from Jill Astbury in ‘the Making of Women’s Madness’. The FEMME that I am writing about is the FEMALE that goes missing in our WESTERN CULTURE mode of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALZING, which assigns ALL AUTHORING OF DEVELOPMENTS to the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and DROPPING OUT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING INFLUENCE. In this example the FEMALE INFLUENCE OF A TOXIC CONTAINING ENVIRONMENT which
Jill Astbury raises questions in regard to the LOCAL AUTHORING assumption in ‘Crazy for You: The Making of Women’s Madness’ in her inquiry into the World Health Organization study showing that women have twice the incidence of ‘affective disorders’ (depression, bipolar disorder etc.) as men.
Astbury makes the point that psychological stress can manifest in an individual experiencing the stress of being in a group of differing others whose sensitivities may be lower and where the group may be cultivating an environment which is highly stressful so that a sensitive minority may manifest problems which are then assumed to be coming from defectiveness rather than sensitivity of a subset of the group. Research into ‘psychological illness’ will pull the patient out and study the patient and not the group, which thus will be ‘missing the point’ since the stress may be a ‘group based’ phenomenon involving a toxic environment;
“The research stemming from this viewpoint had a systemic blindness. It could literally not see what it was doing, as the normative quality of its own presuppositions had made them invisible.” – Jill Astbury
In other words, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS and our MEDICAL and PSYCHIATRIC mainstream services TEND to constrain their investigations of “ILLNESS IN THE PATIENT” to investigating the PATIENT to find out WHAT’S WRONG WITH HER, as in the case of a MENTAL BREAKDOWN without considering the MINER’S CANARY effect where what shows up as ILLNESS in the individual is being induced by the TOXIC FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ENVIRONMENT so the ABNORMAL MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT of the SENSITIVE INDIVIDUAL are SECONDARY (the crazy male asserting/actualizing behaviours of the miner’s canary are secondary and are brought on by the TOXIC ENVIRONMENT .
* * * * * * * * * *
CHERCHEZ LA FEMME COMPLAINT NUMBER #3 The TWIN BROTHER FARMERS who are highly respected in their community for their PRODUCTION of grains and vegetables become divided by one of the brothers being the consistent earner of large income and winner of prizes for his consistent superior production while the other brother, in spite of his equal skill and equal effort, experiences a succession of crop failures from hail storms and local flooding and loses his farm to the mortgage company that forecloses due to his inability to keep up the payments. As the Folk song goes, “There but for fortune, go you or I”.
* * *
IN THESE THREE “CHERCHEZ LA FEMME” COMPLAINTS, the pattern is established that in our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, we can CHOOSE between BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING where we use the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR in the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION that imputes LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS as in crediting the RICH FARMING BROTHER with being THE AUTHOR OF HIS OWN SUCCESS. Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of all FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS tells us that while such propositions may be TRUE, they are inevitably INCOMPLETE, and Modern physics informs us that part of that INCOMPLETENESS is coming from our dropping out mention of the ever-present influence of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM in which material forms are CONDENSATIONS, and as in the indigenous and Modern physics understandings of how different LANGUAGES relate to SENSE-EXPERIENCE reality.
IN SIMPLE TERMS, we cannot (in reality) reduce LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC DYNAMICS which are ANDROGYNOUS, involving, as primary, the ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT, ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka WAVE-FIELD) in which the LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS are included, … to a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO-REALITY. But WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “CAN” and “DO” use LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION that imposes this SIMPLIFYING REDUCTION so , as Kepler points out, it frequently happens that the things which have to be chosen are not those which are most true but those which are most easy. And by that division in things which makes different people form different judgements, it so happens that certain people are in error contrary to their own opinion.”
CHERCHEZ LA FEMME SUM-UP :
The MISSING FEMALE is the MISSING “ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE” as in the example where we speak of the GROWTH of the TOWN, and there may be a lot of PRIDE here and going into detail of all of the NEW DEVELOPMENTS, … DROPPING OUT ALL MENTION OF THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS WHICH IS PART OF THE UNFOLDING REALITY. WHEN WE ‘CHERCHEZ LA FEMME’, we discover that, sure enough, the ENVELOPING WILDERNESS LANDS and the DIVERSITY WITHIN THEM is undergoing SHRINKING in conjugate relation to the GROWING of the TOWN, in which case, what is happening here is NOT the GROWING OF THE TOWN but, INSTEAD, the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE which included “BOTH” the GROWING of the TOWN “AND” the conjugate SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS, or in other words, TRANSFORMATION of the overall LANDSCAPE.
All three of these examples, and there are countless more, point the FACT that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is COMMONLY DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, MAKING IT APPEAR AS IF THERE IS A MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC (e.g. the TOWN IS GROWING) AND THAT IS “ALL THERE IS”, and that reduced representation is due to the fact that ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS ARE INCOMPLETE as Goedel’s Theorem asserts.
LET’S FACE IT, THIS IS A PROBLEM WITH OUR WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALZING ARCHITECTURE that OTHERS, such as the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS DO NOT HAVE because in using a FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE wherein EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX as in a WAVE-FIELD where MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS in the TRANSFORMING FLOW in the manner of WHORLINGS in the FLOWING of river or tidal water. The WHORLINGS are INCLUSIONS IN THE FLOWING in the manner of STRANDS in an ALL-INCLUDING WEB-OF-LIFE. In other words, there is no way to SEPARATE the WHORLING from the FLOWING because the WHORLING IS PART OF THE APPEARANCE OF FLOWING SO THAT THE ONLY PHYSICAL PHENOMENON IS THE FLOWING AND THE TREATING of the WHORLING with LINTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUALIZING THAT USES THE DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR to impute LOCAL BEING with LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT is INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION that serves as COMMUNICATIONS TOOL where all that matters is that the participants in the language group are willing to accept the SAME BOGUS MOCKUP AS THE COMMON REFERENCE that gives MEANING to the SHARED MEANING WORDS the members of the GROUP are USING. That SHARED MEANING DOES NOT HAVE TO BE GROUNDED IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, THE LANGUAGE could be BUILT FROM A FAIRY TALE which is close to what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have done in the architecting of our language with this DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING OF LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.
For example, the WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of the ISRAELI – PALESTINIAN CONFLICT in terms of TWO INDEPENDENT GROUPS ATTACKING ONE ANOTHER as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE as is the formulation of our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING has NO BASIS IN REALITY, but we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are WORKING WITH LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS of a SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC nature where we say things like THEY DID IT which implies LOCAL AUTHORING (i.e. “THEY DID IT” is exemplary of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR). First we use the NAME ‘THEY’ to impute LOCAL, INDEPENDENT BEING, and we conflate this with the VERB “TO DO” so as to construct the impression of LOCAL AUTHORING involving only TWO INDEPENDENT BEING things as if in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE, which is an important condition dictated by our imputing of INDEPENDENCE to the TWO BEINGS, … which are NO WAY TWO INDEPENDENT BEINGS in MODERN PHYSICS and/or indigenous aboriginal cultures, where they too are STRANDS IN THE ONE WEB-OF-LIFE aka CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin).
In the more realistic understanding wherein we are all strands in the ONE WEB-OF-LIFE aka CONDENSATIONS IN THE ALL INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, the AUTHORING of actions is NOT NEARLY SO SIMPLE (i.e. that PSEUDO-SIMPLICITY OF PURPORTED “LOCAL AUTHORING” COMES FROM WESTERN CULTURE EGO fuelled by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR).
In Indigenous aboriginal cultures, the HEALING CIRCLE demonstrates the understanding that emergent events are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) in origin and there is NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING of EXPLICIT ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT. We all share inclusion within a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM and where there are ERUPTIONS OF MURDEROUS VIOLENCE, THOSE HOLDING THE SMOKING GUNS ARE THE CONDUITS THROUGH WHOM THE BUILDUP OF TENSIONS IN THE SOCIAL RELATIONAL WEB, (which have gathered energy from strands in the web connecting both sides of the polarized matrix) FIND VENTING. The notion of the VIOLENCE HAVING LOCAL ORIGINATION FROM A SQUAD OF INDEPENDENT EVIL BEINGS, means that the REMEDY is NOT, as would ‘make sense’, to convene HEALING CIRCLES to reconcile and subsume tensions that have been building in the relational social matrix, … BUT orienting instead to the ELIMINATING of the SQUAD of INDEPENDENT EVIL BEINGS, so as to PURIFY THE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE.
HOW CRAZY IS THAT? — In the understanding of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, IT IS TOTALLY INSANE.
IT IS INSANE because WE ARE ALL RELATED (MITAKUYE OYASIN within the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein material forms such as ourselves are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka WAVE-FIELD).
-2- QUANTUM LOGIC INCLUSION OF MAN-IN-EARTH (CONDENSATION OF WAVE-FIELD IN WAVE-FIELD): This we know, the earth does not belong to man, man belongs to the earth. This we know. All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected. Whatever befalls the earth, befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”— “Chief Seattle”
___
-1- BINARY LOGIC SPLIT OF MAN AND EARTH (MATERIAL BEING IN EMPTY SPACE): Genesis 1:28 And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth.
IT IS ONE THING TO OVERCOMING DISSONANCE AND IMBALANCE THROUGH RESTORING AND SUSTAINING BALANCE AND HARMONY IN THE RELATIONAL WEB, IN THE WAKE OF EMERGENT VIOLENT DISSONANCE, … and quite another to SEEK OUT AND ELIMINATE “EVIL INDEPENDENT BEINGS” as ISRAELIS SEEK TO ELIMINATE HAMAS AND VICE VERSA.
IN THIS CHERCHEZ LA FEMME SUM-UP, AN IMPORTANT POINT OF NOTE IS THE FOLLOWING:
CHERCHEZ LA FEMME SUM-UP
While QUANTUM PHYSICS and Bohm and Schroedinger, and indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents give a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in their LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME TO QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM (which is the LOGIC of BALANCE and IMBALANCE), WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS give a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in their LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME to BINARY LOGIC, the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM (i.e. absolute empty and infinite space medium).
THE MAJOR DIFFERENCE between these two LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEMES is that IN THE WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, there is TOTAL EXCLUSION OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/INCLUDING CONJUGATE (i.e. the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED-PLENUM) THAT IS THE MAINSTAY OF THE QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME Of MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.
So, in the WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC ‘excluded medium’ LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, INSTEAD OF THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM as the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING MOTHER OF MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS, there is AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT wherein everything that is NOT EMPTINESS is ACCORDED MATERIAL-based BEING thus forming a BINARY LOGIC (EITHER something OR nothing) based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME.
ll these things being considered, it seems probable to me, that God in the Beginning form’d matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable Particles, of such Sizes and Figures, and with such other Properties, and in such Proportion to Space, as most conduced to the end for which he form’d them; and these primitive Particles being Solids, are incomparably harder than any porous Bodies compounded of them; even so very hard as never to wear or break in pieces: no ordinary Power being able to divide what God himself made one in the first Creation.” –Isaac Newton, Opticks: or, A Treatise of the Reflexions, Refractions, Inflexions and Colours of Light
This sets forth a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING (in empty space) LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which supports ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY AS WITH LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS such as THE TOWN IS GROWING. In this case, there is no FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE as there is in the indigenous aboriginal and MODERN PHYSICS LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME, where one employs QUANTUM LOGIC as in “THERE IS TOWNING (male asserting/actualizing) IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (female accommodating/enabling)”
POINTS OF NOTE:
-1- WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION which gives a foundational tole to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT as in in ABSOLUTE EMPTY and INFINITE SPACE.
-2- Indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta employ less simple QUANTUM LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION which gives a foundational role to the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the PLENUM in a QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC RELATION
-3- The THREE “CHERCHEZ LA FEMME COMPLAINTS all showed physical situations which could NOT BE CAPTURED IN SIMPLE ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING TERMS. This was because there was a need, in all three cased, to acknowledge the role of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM as was IMPLIED but not directly mentioned in the case studies being pointed to. For example, Jill Astbury NATURALLY ASSUMED THE REAL POSSIBILITY OF A TOXIC ENVIRONMENT could alter the behaviour of the person or canary within it. To make the assumption that aberrant behaviour is being authored fully and solely by the ‘independent human being’ that is displaying it, means that he patient can be taken into a clinic and her ‘individual workings’ analyzed to come up with an explanation for her anomalous behaviour. This limited view is the BINARY LOGIC view where the patient is deemed INDEPENDENT of the environment she is situated in. CHERCHEZ LA FEMME is a reminder that there is always, in our sense experience of inclusion in the energy-charged PLENUM, a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING wave-field conjugate that comes together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate.
For example, if the GROWTH OF AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT CONTINUES FOR A LONG TIME, the quality of the crops may decline and pollination by bees etc. may become problematic because while the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION “GROWTH OF DEVELOPMENT” does not capture it, there is also CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS and the bees and nutrients and other influences that are in decline as a result will be contributing to overall TRANSFORMATION as the WILDERNESS DIVERSITY SHRINKS in conjugate relation to the GROWTH of CULTIVATED CROPLANDS, in which case, it is UNREAL to speak in terms of the GROWTH of the CROPLANDS since there is no mention of the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS LANDS.
This ERROR is NOT MADE by indigenous aborignals due to their QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE where they speak in terms of ‘there is CROP-CULTIVATING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which includes FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING (the transforming landscape which is the receptacle for the male asserting/actualizing CROP-CULTIVATING)
To DROP OUT MENTION of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and go SOLELY with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘WE ARE GROWING THE CROPLANDS’ is to give the impression that the GROWTH OF CROPLANDS IS “SOMETHING REAL” and in fact SOMETHING GOOD. However, the GROWTH of CROPLANDS may be OUT OF BALANCE in the sense that what is UNMENTIONED is the SHRINKING OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WILDERNESS LANDS which is part of the REALITY of what is going on, and which figures in the changing BALANCE by way of SHRINKING WILDERNESS DIVERSITY and GROWING of CULTIVATED MONO-CULTURE.
WE WESTERN CUILTURE ADHERENTS, by using BOGUS TERMS such as GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, … all of which are one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY conjugates are at the same time DROPPING OUT of the LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS which, together with the MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “GROWTH”, “DEVELOPMENT” and “PRODUCTION” is referring to the TRANSFORMING OF THE LANDSCAPE that is what our SENSE-EXPERIENCE IS INFORMING US, without dependency on our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING METHOD OF CHOICE.
NOT MODERN PHYSICS, NOT INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, NOT TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and NOT ADVAITA VEDATA FALL INTO THE TRAP OF DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJGUATE in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, however, that is the MISTAKE of WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING as with ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’, .. which differs basically (radically) from the MODERN PHYSICS and INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, TAOIST/BUDDHIST AND ADVAITA VEDANTA QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME which RETAINS the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING conjugate and thus retains a WAVE-FIELD CONCEPTUALIZATION CAPABILITY.
* * * * * * * * *
THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING IS the ‘MOTHER OF’ MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.. The MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING is “APPEARANCE”, “SCHAUMKOMMEN”. The FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING VALLEY, brings together rain rivulets into streams and streams into mighty rivers which SO WE SAY, CHURN OUT MASSIVE CANYONS, OR IT THE OTHER WAY ROUND? DO THE VALLEYS ORGANIZE THE RAINFALL GIVE IT ITS SCULPTING POWERS? When RAIN is falling onto the CONVEX out flanks of the mountain, the RAIN SCATTERS rather than GATHERS, so it appears as if the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT VALLEY possesses the primary authoring power and the power we attribute to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT RAGING RIVER is only APPEARANCE since the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (the WAVE-FIELD) seems to be the AUTHORING SOURCE.
The BOTTOM LINE IS, … CHERCHEZ LA FEMME!
* * * * *
FOOTNOTE re the NON-UNIVERSALITY OF BINARY LOGIC.
“At the core of our spiritual beings we make no artificial distinction between the sacred and the profane. Unlike Western culture, we have not suffered through that artificial separation”
According to Tomoko Masuzawa, any cosmology without a sacred–profane binary was rendered invisible by the field of religious studies, privileging Christianity at the expense of non-Christian systems because the binary was supposed to be “universal”, –Wikipedia
Most Recent Comments