Aboriginal Physics Newsletter

INTRODUCTION:

Western Culture, by using a form of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING that DROPS OUT the natural FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and employs ONLY the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE as if within an EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT (the OBSCURANTIST SUBSTITUTE for the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka “WAVE-FIELD”, because it FRAGMENTS our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION of REALITY (inducing schizophrenia) and OBSCURES the primary authoring agency which is the energy-charged plenum (inducing paranoia due the shortfall of LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING in ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY TERMS).

If the MURDERER is NOT the FULL and SOLE AUTHOR OF THE KILLER ACT but is caught up in relational dissonance wherein tensions that have developed within the relational matrix of community FIND EXPRESSION THROUGH AND INDIVIDUAL who is then labelled ‘the LOCAL AUTHOR’ of the KILLER ACT, we not ony have the situation wherein what we mislabel as ‘the LOGIC AUTHOR is instead a CONDUIT for the expressing of pent-up relational tensions THAT “BELONG TO” the full relational matrix.

As with the phenomenon of the MINER’S CANARY and the IDENTIFIED PATIENT SYNDROME, there are CONDUITS that release RELATIONAL TENSIONAL BUILDUPS that ‘BELONG TO’ the full NONLOCAL relational matrix of community that MERELY FIND LOCAL, EXPLICIT EXPRESSION through the sensitive MINER’S CANARIES and the IDENTIFIED PATIENTS but whose ORIGIN IS, in our sense-experience reality, NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT.   As POGO SAYS, WE HAVE FOUND THE ENEMY AND HE IS US, but such an ENLIGHTENED view is UNCOMMON in WESTERN CULTURE where the JUDICIAL PRACTICE IS TO CONSIDER “EVERYONE INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY” where there is no equivalent ‘MITAKUYE OYASIN’ (we are all related) understanding and thus no HEALING CIRCLE brand of RESTORATIVE JUSTICE, the BINARY LOGIC VERSION OF JUSTICE  (the CHOICE of WESTERN CUSTICE) being PURIFICATIONISM, the ELIMINATING OF EVIL DOING BEINGS so that GOOD DOING BEINGS may prevail.

The WESTERN CULTURE CHOICE OF REALITY IN TERMS OF LOCAL, EXPLICIT AUTHORING OF ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, which prevades LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, because it DROPS OUT THE PRIMARY FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE creates SPOOKS sincein the general case of relational interactons, such situations as where a PUNCH engages with a recipient’s skull and the skull shatters and given that the skull was EGGSHELL THIN, it is OVER-SIMPLISTIC to ATTRIBUTE THE SHATTERING OF THE SKULL FULLY AND SOLELY TO THE FORCE OF THE PUNCH, but this is the standard approach in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING and this OBSUCURANTISM (the dropping out, in LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALYZING, of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate).

(more…)

PREAMBLE:  LOCAL AUTHORING is WESTERN CULTURE MYTH that comes from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR as Nietzsche pointed out, and it is SECURED BY ‘PRIDE’.   For example the PRIDE of BELONGING to something or of SOMETHING BELONGING to ONE-SELF (e.g. one’s child) is characteristic of WESTERN CULTURE noun-based inguistic conceptualizing.

Noun-based language: a language, such as English, that relies on nouns (people, places, or things) to convey meaning. Verb-based language: languages, such as Dee- ni’ and other Indigenous languages, rely on verbs (actions) to convey meaning.

In indigenous aboriginal verb-based languages, there are only RELATIONAL DYNAMICS as if in an all-including transforming relational continuum or ‘wave-field’ wherein there is NO LOCAL AUTHORING of ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT and thus NO PRIDE in the sense of INDEPENDENT AUTHORING or OWNERSHIP of actions or developments, since unfolding developments in a relational continuum derive from ‘all my relations’ (mitakuye oyasin).

David Bohm notes that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES support NOUN based CONCEPTUALIZATION which is FRAGMENTATIVE (and OBSCURATIVE).

What is needed, Bohm argued in his book Wholeness and the Implicate Order, is a new sort of language, one based on processes and activity, transformation and change, rather than on the interactions of stable objects. Bohm called this hypothetical language the “rheomode.” It is based primarily on verbs and on grammatical structures deriving from verbs. Such a language, Bohm argued, is perfectly adapted to a reality of enfolding and unfolding matter and thought.

David Bohm had not known when he wrote of that concept that such a language is not just a physicist’s hypothesis. It actually exists. The language of the Algonquin peoples was developed by the ancestors specifically to deal with subtle matters of reality, society, thought, and spirituality.

A few months before his death, Bohm met with a number of Algonkian speakers and was struck by the perfect bridge between their language and worldview and his own exploratory philosophy. What to Bohm had been major breakthroughs in human thought — quantum theory, relativity, his implicate order and rheomode – were part of the everyday life and speech of the Blackfoot, Mic Maq, Cree and Ojibwaj.” – F. David Peat, ‘Blackfoot Physics’

There is NO SENSE OF “LOCAL AUTHORING”, in either MODERN PHYSICS or in indigenous aboriginal langauge-based conceptualization, nor in Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.  In what we call ‘OUR OWN ACTIONS or the ACTIONS of ‘OUR COUNTRY’, … EVENTS are NOT, in sense-experience reality, LOCAL and EXPLICIT as we present them with the DOUBLE ERROR combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  In fact, THEY ARE NOT EVEN ‘EVENTS’ but are relational BOILINGS UP within the unbounded web of relations that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).  What is LOCAL and EXPLICIT are the INTELLECTUAL REDUCTIVE FRAGMENTATIVE ABSTRACTIONS of DUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LANGUAGE while what is affirmed in NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT sense-experience grounded FLOW-BASED LANGUAGE is the all-including WEB of RELATIONS aka the all-including WAVE-FIELD in which PEOPLE are CONDENSATIONS.

IN WESTERN CULTURE, HOWEVER, the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR gives foundational grounding to “PRIDE” and the EGO-INFLATING that comes with PRIDE OF ACHIEVEMENT or PRIDE OF POSSESSION, the ‘FULFILMENT of an operation or task’.  As is evident, LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES such as those employed in WESTERN CULTURE that develop concepts such as ‘the COMPLETION OF A TASK’ imply, erroneously, both FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.  The highway signs that say, on their flip sides, ENTERING THE TOWN OF PLEASANTVILLE and LEAVING THE TOWN OF PLEASANTVILLE leave the ‘reader’ with the impression that there exists (as long as sufficient influential people feign belief in it) is a LOCAL, EXPLICIT thing-in-itself.

This ‘announcement’ called ‘the TOWN of PLEASANTVILLE’ which is intellectual abstraction that the four-leggeds and winged and crawling ones do not have to deal with; i.e. they do not have to deal with the psychological FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM that NOUN-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING BRINGS WITH IT (i.e. the PRICE of using a SIMPLIFYING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME that uses INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTIONS that DROP OUT MENTION of the basic RELATIONAL nature of the world of our sense-experience of inclusion therein).  This is a huge pice that is paid for by submission to FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM.

FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM are the RESULT of our WESTERN CULTURE USE of SENSE-EXPERIENCE-SIMPLIFYING LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  For example, while our sense-experience is of “INCLUSION IN THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD’, … as sense-experience affirmed reality which “IS CAPTURED” in indigenous aboriginall FLOW-BASED LANGUAGES which are capable of sharing the equivalent of “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”  (which is the FULL sense-experience affirming androgynous wave-field reality).

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES that employ BEING-based CONCEPTUALIZATION schemes REDUCE the QUANTUM LOGIC relation associated with material CONDENSATIONS of the all-including fluid WAVE-FIELD, and SUBSTITUTE the SIMPLER BINARY LOGIC relation associated with ABSOLUTE MATERIAL OBJECTS notionally moving about and interacting within an ABSTRACT ABSOLUTE, EMPTY and INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.

This change in the INFORMING of our physical actions, SHIFTING from our sense-experience of INCLUSION in NATURE’S QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD PLENUM WITH ITS MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS, over to an INFORMING by INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based BINARY LOGIC SIMPLIFICATION which ENGINEERS LINGUISTIC SIMPLIFICATION BY DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, SUBSTITUTING ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE ENTENT.

THE “PSYCHOLOGICAL COST” of this WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC DROP-DOWN from QUANTUM LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION to BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION is FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM, neither of which occur in indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedantat where the relational nature of our sense experience of inclusion in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM (aka WAVE-FIELD) is captured in our language-based CONCEPTUALIZATION, hence, … ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ (wherein everything is in flux) this more complete QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION being employed instead of the WESTERN CULTURE SIMPLIFIED OBJECT-BASED LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, ‘‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.

To assess the DIFFERENT PERSONAL EMOTIONAL IMPACTS of these different LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES, consider the  huge difference in emotional impact of  the QUANTUM LOGIC “THERE IS HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM” as is the understanding of MODERN PHYSICS wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD, … AS COMPARED WITH ,…. the emotional impact of the BINARY LOGIC “The HUMAN COMMUNITY IS GROWING , DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services””.

It is evident that in the latter BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR is in play which implies LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments, whereas in the former QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, there is one overall dynamic that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and is referred to as TRANSFORMATION.

Belief in the BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION of LOCAL AUTHORING gives rise to the BINARY LOGIC emotions of EITHER PRIDE OR SHAME depending on the BINARY LOGIC intellectual assessments of the LOCAL AUTHORING as being EITHER GOOD OR BAD, HELPFUL OR HARMFUL, ENRICHING OR IMPOVERISHING.

BELIEF in the QUANTUM LOGIC sense-experience affirmed assessment of relational BALANCE/RESONANCE and IMBALANCE/DISSONANCE wherein there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, it is clear that there is no way to UNDERSTAND (in a sense-experience affirmable way) TOWNING out of the context of its QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND INCLUSION of the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM it is INCLUDED IN, in which case the QUANTUM LOGIC relation can be seen as LESS SIMPLE but MORE COMPLETE than the BINARY LOGIC relation since the BINARY LOGIC relation is too simple to capture the less simple GESTALT as the WILDERNESS SHRINKS in conjugate relation to the GROWTH of the TOWN.   NOT MUCH TOWN AND LOTS OF WILDERNESS has a ‘different aesthetic feel to it’ as an overall ‘package’ (GESTALT) than A LOT OF TOWN and a small remnant of WILDERNESS.

As Goedel’s Theorem WARNS US, all finite systems of logic propositions are INCOMPLETE, and in this case, we can say for sure that IT IS TRUE THAT THE TOWN IS GROWING, but it is INCOMPLETE in the sense that there is NOTHING in the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY abstraction of GROWTH that informs us of the SENSE-EXPERIENCE GROUNDED impact of TRANSFORMATION where we INCLUDE the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate, these two conjugates COMPRISING THE ONE ANDROGYNOUS DYNAMIC OF TRANSFORMATION (where the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ‘wilderness is shrinking’ and the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ‘growing of the development’ are two faces of a single coinage.  This QUANTUM LOGIC relation is the way things go in a spherical space of finite extent, as contrasts with the BINARY LOGIC relation which is the way things go in a flat space of infinite extent.

THERE ARE HIDDEN ERRORS IN OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS such as in the DUMBING DOWN from less simple QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM, … to simple BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM (EMPTY SPACE MEDIUM).

There is a LOT tied up in this lingistic sleight of hand, including the REDUCTION FROM LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC TO SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC, by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which imputes JUMP-START MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as in in EMPTY SPACE, thanks to the OBSCURANIST DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, as in the SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY of the OPENING UP AS IN ‘SHRINKING’ OF THE WILDERNESS in conjugate relation with the GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT of the TOWN.

YES, OUR “LOGICAL PROPOSITION” that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ is “TRUE” but at the same time, “IT IS INCOMPLETE” in that it fails to acknowledge that is ALSO TRUE that the WILDERNESS IS SHRINKING in which case we are being DECEPTIVE when we employ LOGICAL TRUTHS such as ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ since such truthful logical propositions fail to report on the SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS.

THIS GOEDEL’S THEOREM AFFIRMED DECEPTIVENESS IN COMMON LOGIC SHOCKED THE HELL OUT OF MATHEMATICIANS in the 1930’s when GOEDEL PROVED IT, but the message didn’t get out to the masses and stop us all from putting so much FAITH IN, and the DESIGN OF PLANS AND ACTIONS based on LOCAL PROPOSITIONS that always have this INCOMPLETENESS EXPOSURE.  These INCOMPLETENESSES in our LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS are the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM IN WESTERN CULTURE and Bohm writes about FRAGMENTATION but not so much about OBSCURANTISM, although they are both coming from the same source of the INCOMPLETENESS of BINARY LOGIC.

OBSCURANTISM IS, well, MORE OBSCURE than FRAGMENTATION even though it is coming from the same source, the SUBSTITUTING of SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONCEPTUALIZATION [the TOWN is GROWING] for LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC based  ANDROGYNOUS CONCEPTUALIZATION [there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE]… is OBSCURED by the fact that the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING PROPOSITION is the VISIBLE, TANGIBLE because LOCAL, EXPLICIT component of complex WAVE-FIELD reality even though THE LOCAL, EXPLICIT IS ONLY ‘APPEARANCE’ or ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ because the real body of WAVE-FIELD DYNAMICS is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  In order to architect language based conceptualizing in this case, the language must avoid all dependence on the absolute, local, explicit material, and thus must employ NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT (relations) IN THE FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in the linguistic conceptualizing.  For example there is HUMANING in the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM, … which brings us full circle back around to how WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING is SCREWING UP OUR PSYCHE.

There is a CIRCULAR ECONOMY in WESTERN CULTURE that REWARDS those that SUPPORT LINGUIST CONCEPTUALIZATIONS that while BOGUS like SELF-PROCLAIMED BINARY LOGIC based INDEPENDENT NATIONS that attain notional LOCAL, EXPLICIT FRAGMENTED EXISTENCE.

INDEPENDENT NATIONS are ABSTRACTIONS supported by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which implies the ‘existence’ of a LOCAL THING (e.g. the ‘Independent ‘Nation State’).

These abstractions, which overtly conflict with the world of our sense-experience wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED, PERSIST as we have an EMOTIONAL ATTACHMENT TO THEM.   While life is MORE THAN POSSESSIONS, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have developed a powerful emotion associated with the PRIDE of POSSESSION.

PRIDE associated with the LOCAL, EXPLICIT and TANGIBLE (e.g. material possessions), …  ‘SWELLS THE HEAD’, …while INSPIRATION coming from the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT and INTANGIBLE ‘FILLS the HEART’.

Recall that indigenous aboriginal mocked the WESTERN CULTURE for its LANGUAGE BASED FRAGMENTING OF REALITY, a FRAGMENTATION that FRAGMENTED HUMANINGS IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM out into a VAST UNBOUNDED EMPTINESS call SPACE.

In our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES, we notice the strong ties arising between PRIDE and the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LOCAL AUTHORING ABSTRACTION and how DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE have set up a FRAGMENTED GRID upon which the COLLECTION of SWOLLEN EGOS have been giving themselves their own separate LAUNCHING PADS to STRUT THEIR STUFF, a blatant FRAGMENTATIVE/OBSCURANTIST “INTELLECTUAL-LINGUISTIC” denial of our sense-experience affirmed global interconnectedness and interdependence wherein;

This we know, the earth does not belong to man, man belongs to the earth. This we know. All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected. Whatever befalls the earth, befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”— “Chief Seattle”

There is sufficient evidence here, then some, to establish that the reality we share oursense experience of inclusion in, which is the same reality AND FOR for MODERN PHYSICISTS like Bohm, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta, and others like some of the Systems Sciences investigators, the LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATIONS are the same; i.e. they are QUANTUM LOGIC based while the DOMINATING MINORITY of people, due to the GLOBALLY DOMINANT EUROPEAN LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING STANDARD, A BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZING STANDARD.

This BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE STANDARD is the source of FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM, as is written about in this essay.   THIS FRAGMENTATION AND OBSCURATION IS NOT PRESENT IN THE REALITY SHAPING CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE, nor in the REALITY-SHAPING CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of MODERN PHYSICS, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, as elaborated on in by David Bohm and F. David Peat, AS WELL AS BY “CHIEF SEATTLE” in the above note.

NOW, AS WE WATCH THE FRAGMENTATION OF OUR WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES INTO MORE AND MORE SUB-CATEGORIES LIKE JEWS, CHRISTIANS AND MUSLIMS WHICH BREAK DOWN INTO THEIR SUBCATEGORIES, WHAT DO WE SEE GOIG ON?  THE INTELLECTUAL RENOUNCING OF WHAT OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE IS INFORMING US, “The earth does not belong to man, man belongs to the earth. This we know. All things are connected like the blood which unites one family. All things are connected. Whatever befalls the earth, befalls the sons of the earth. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.”— OR, IN OTHER WORDS,, THE WORDS OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE; 

“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionist scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

Suboptimization is where there is DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE of some thing or group together with policies and programs that aim to IMPROVE the health and overall ‘well-being’ of the NATION or GROP that has been ‘DECLARED INDEPENDENT’.  We know one thing for sure, if Modern physics, Systems sciences, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta are on target with their understanding that we live in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence”  then we can expect, in our operative world dynamic, FRAGMENTATION and OBSCURANTISM because that is what our WESTERN CULTURE use of our BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, as our OPERATIVE REALITY, is GOING TO DO TO US; i.e. “IS DOING TO US”.

We have FRAGMENTATION because almost all of our WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are operating as if the reality we are living in is the BINARY LOGIC based pseudo-reality of our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS.  We have OBSCURANTISM because even though the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE of the all-including WAVE-FIELD REALITY is overtly mainifesting; e.g. the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS that is conjugate with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWTH of the TOWN, … WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS SPEAK OF THE GROWTH OF THE TOWN as if that were REALITY.

It may be ABSTRACT BINARY LOGIC BASED INTELLECTUAL REALITY WHERE WE GET AWAY WITH DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE because we are forgetting Goedel’s Theorem which warns us that all finite LOGIC PROPOSITIONS such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ are “INCOMPLETE”, and the DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS, which we are DROPPING OUT, is NO SMALL DEAL, because only if we acknowledge BOTH IN CONJUGATE CONTEXT do we understand that what is going on IS ‘NOT GROWTH” of this and ‘NOT SHRINKING’ of that,but OVERALL TRANSFORMING that is ALL-INCLUDING, EVERYWHERE AT THE SAME TIME as is the nature of the ENERGY-CHARGED-PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

From the notion of LOCAL AUTHORING there is consistency with DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE, and all of this is PUT DOWN by the Systems Sciences that use the term ‘the Name of the Devil is Suboptimization.

PRIDE is an intoxicating high that often associates with the FALSE notion of LOCAL AUTHORING which is a WESTERN CULTURE EXPOSURE that comes by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.   The foundations for this DELUSION are put in place by DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE which gives synthetic legitimacy to those making the declaration.

Declarations of Independence GO HAND-IN-HAND with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that sets up the ABSTRACTION of ‘LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS’ where there is NO SUCH THING since we live in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence, aka the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD”

The DECLARATION of INDEPENDENCE is a formal announcement of the intention to use THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR that imputes LOCAL AUTHORING, the new NAME DISTINGUISHING YET ANOTHER FRAGMENT, THE NEW LOCAL AUTHOR, INCREASING THE FRAGMENTATION and concretizing the deal with new NATIONAL ANTHEMS where an oath is worn (but only by the two-leggeds since that is the price of residency status, since people began buying and selling pieces of the PLENUM and where military presence was the only inhibitor to a claim-staking gold rush.  Once established, the colonizing armies who were playing musical chairs with the properties traditionally inhabited by long-time ‘local residents’ recast themselves as anti-theft police, the police forces having pulled the plug on the musical chair game, the timing for the freeze having been chosen by the currently most successful and most powerful of the colonizers (‘La raison du plus fort est toujor la meilleure’)

Since this was originally intended to be a PREAMBLE, I will stop it here and now, on the day that the Israeli’s under Netanyahu are in the middle of the throes of BINARY LOGIC based conflict where the usual POLARIZATION is manifesting which has been built into Judaic-Christian-Islamic BINARY LOGIC based linguistic conceptualization, even as the QUANTUM LOGIC linguistic conceptualizing of indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta in the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC terms of balance/imbalance and/or resonance/dissonance.  In this QUANTUM LOGIC understanding, there are no endless see-saw reversals of the BINARY OPTIONS of GOOD and EVIL in LOCAL, EXPLICIT FORM based on the presumption of LOCAL AUTHORING by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, which by the way, is playing the foundational role in the concept of PRIDE which has been the mainstay of FRAGMENTATION into notionally ‘INDEPENDENT FRAGMENTS’.

The DROPPING OUT, in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION of the conceptualizing capability of INSPIRATION which is FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING, is what has left us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS with a SIMPLE one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conceptualizing scheme, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE having turned the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE INTO A PUMPKIN of ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

* * * 

We live in a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, a WAVE-FIELD dynamic which is ANDROGYNOUS, having BOTH FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING … AS WELL AS … MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING influences.   For example, THE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING GROWING OF THE TOWN … is, at the same time, … THE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS.

These TWO developmental approaches are co-contributors to TRANSFORMATION as when there is a SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS … IN CONJUGATE RELATION… with the GROWING of DELIBERATELY DEVELOPED TOWNS..

Transformation can bring with it an overall change in GESTALT.  For example, for those animals whose survival depends on finding shelter from their predators, their security may take a sudden DROP if conditions change so that there are no more ‘hollow logs’ to protect small animals ‘of prey’ from their predators, or no more vesicular rocks that povide hiding places for insects to protect them from larger animals such as bears.

The point I want to explore is our differing INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL (and Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta) VERSUS WESTERN CULTURE assumptions about CONSCIOUSNESS and how it impacts our LANGUAGE based REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING.

For example, for indigenous aboriginals and also MODERN PHYSICS, CONSCIOUSNESS is a property of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD while in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING, CONSCIOUSNESS IS SOMETHING ‘LOCAL’  THAT SUPPORTS THE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING DYNAMICS OF ‘THE INTELLECTUALIZING BRAIN’.

It is possible, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS OF ‘REALITY’, to DIVIDE ‘the CREATION’ up into the CONSCIOUS (e.g. HUMANS) and UNCONSCIOUS (e.g. ROCKS), however, in indigenous aboriginal cultures as in MODERN PHYSICS, the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD is a FIELD OF CONSCIOUSNESS.

“For most of human history, the word ‘consciousness’ was generally taken to indicate not the sort of individual awareness to which the word now refers, but rather a universal entity variously named Atman, Brahman, Allah, Jehovah, God, the Unmoved Mover (Aristotle), Absolute Spirit (Hegel), or any number of other names according to who was writing about it.” — Dr. Susan Pockett, University of Auckland

(more…)

This is a spell-corrected version of the note by this title previously sent to a distribution list.  I am spell-correcting it and am herewith archiving it on my Aboriginal Physics Newsletter website because I feel it manages to capture the subtle issues associated with understanding the differences between QUANTUM LOGIC and BINARY LOGIC more clearly, perhaps, than usual.  For example while BINARY LOGIC is simple and captures only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC, QUANTUM LOGIC is LESS simple and captures, AS WELL, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate, where these TWO CONJUGATES correspond to the REAL and IMAGINARY components of the WAVE-FIELD dynamic.

Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE is dropping out the IMAGINARY COMPONENT of the COMPLEX WAVE-FIELD dynamic.  In other words, SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC is only capable of expressing MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING dynamics such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ while the LESS SIMPLE combination of MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate and FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate is capable of capturing THE FULL COMPLEX (real plus imaginary) WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC as in ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ wherein everything is in flux and there is no EMPTY SPACE CONTAINER since the ANDROGYNOUS combination captures the CONDENSATION within the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD in the QUANTUM LOGIC relation wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE (where the CONDENSATION [figure] is a feature of the ENERGY-CHARGED-PLENUM [ground].

This is really the key point of this essay, that we are included in the all-including transforming relational continuum aka ‘the wave-field’ which has a COMPLEX (real plus imaginary structure).  By this I mean that the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate corresponds to the REAL component which is tangible and visible but only in the sense of a CONDENSATION in the all-including WAVE-FIELD which is ITSELF NONLOCAL and NON-VISIBLE as is the nature of wave-fields.  The CONDENSATION is ONLY APPEARANCE  because while the WAVE-FIELD is in continuing flux of a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) nature, the CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD appears LOCAL and EXPLICIT and while it APPEARS “REAL”, it is only “REAL” in the sense of being a LOCAL, EXPLICIT ‘APPEARANCE’ as with a CLOUD which is a CONDENSATION of an ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.  MATERIAL FORMS such as HUMANINGS understood as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD are part of the overall, all-including ENERGY CHARGED PLENUM aka TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, which exemplifies the QUANTUM LOGIC relation, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM where the CONDENSATION is both a LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORM and at the same time, the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

BINARY LOGIC IS “TOO SIMPLE” to capture the COMPLEX WAVE-FIELD basis of reality, but WHAT BINARY LOGIC CAN DO, is CAPTURE the ‘REAL COMPONENT’ of the COMPLEX (REAL + IMAGINARY or LOCAL-EXPLICIT + NONLOCAL-IMPLICIT) WAVE-FIELD structure.  WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE has been based on LINGUAFYING the REAL, LOCAL, EXPLICIT CONJUGATE of the WAVE-FIELD and simply DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE because it is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) and requires, for its linguistic sharing, LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE, the BOTH/AND LOGIC based LANGUAGE of the INCLUDING MEDIUM, as where one says, ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.  This language is COMPLEX in the sense that the TOWNING is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and is in an innate conjugate relationship with the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS opted for LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which DROPS OUT THE NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, leaving ABSOLUTE EMPTY, INFINITE SPACE to ‘work with’ the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE which serves as the LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL ENTITY designated by NAMING and given notional LOCAL AUTHORING POWER with GRAMMAR.  This SIMPLIFIED ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL DYNAMIC IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY PSEUDO-REALITY is WESTERN CULTURE ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’.  It is a PSEUDO-REALITY that is REDUCED to the DYNAMICS of MATERIAL OBJECTS THAT WE PURPORT TO MOVE ABOUT and INTERACT as if in ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL languages and Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta language, have the same COMPLEX (real + imaginary, or LOCAL/EXPLICIT + NONLOCAL/IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE.  In THIS INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL COMPLEX, WAVE-FIELD CAPABLE (REAL + IMAGINARY) LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING where we can speak in terms of TOWNING (local, explicit) in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (nonlocal, implicit), not as TWO SEPARATE THINGS but as ONE COMPLEX RELATIONAL STRUCTURE wherein the LOCAL, EXPLICIT TOWNING is INCLUDED IN THE NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

The above INTRODUCTION to this SPELL-CORRECTED VERSION of the previous note summarizes the structures of the TWO DIFFERENT LANGUAGE BASED REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATIONS; i.e. the MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING ARCHITECTURE and the WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC REALITY CONCEPTUALING ARCHITECTURE.

The original essay, now spell corrected and augmented to clarify key passages, follows;

* * *

(more…)

PREFACE:   We live in a WAVE-FIELD world that requires a COMPLEX (real + imaginary) LANGUAGE STRUCTURE as employed in Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal languages, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.

In our ENGLISH LANGUAGE (and in the Common Average European family of languages) we give credit for ACTION-AUTHORED RESULTS to MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING as if the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE DID NOT EXIST, but it DOES EXIST which means that a language architecture that constrains conceptualizatoin to one-sided MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, as is the nature of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, will produce CONCEPTUALIZATIONS that are INCOMPLETE in that they DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING as is the case in  ‘To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose’.  This aphorism is reminding us of the WAVE-FIELD NATURE of our sense-experience reality, wherein we cannot attribute action and development simply to MALE ASSERTING as we have engineered into our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE and GRAMMAR based CONCEPTUALIZING, but we must, as Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents do, acknowledge the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE. 

But in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING, we give BINARY LOGIC a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in which case, we speak only in the one-sided terms of the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING development without acknowledging the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONTRIBUTION which can vary just as well as the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENCY can vary.  The aphorism ‘To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose’ reminds us, in effect, of the QUANTUM LOGIC structure of reality which is OBSCURED in BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING.  We say that ‘the BLOW EITHER shatters the sea-creature’s shell OR DOES NOT, without acknowledging that the shell may be newly formed and fragile or old and hard as rock, so that our WESTERN CULTURE HABIT of LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING that is ONE-SIDEDLY MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, FALSELY gives FULL and SOLE CREDIT for the RESULTS of ACTION to the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING without acknowledging an ever-present role of CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING.

As a result, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is SIMPLER than indigenous aboriginal language in the same way that Newtonian physics is simpler than Quantum physics.  While WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is grounded in the abstraction of LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEING BASED MECHANICS,  indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta languages are  grounded in NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT FLOW-BASED TRANSFORMATION.  While the Newtonian language has a BINARY “EITHER/OR” LOGIC base coming from the assumption that reality is comprised of material objects that are ‘separate from’ and ‘moving about in’ an all-including ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT, … the indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta language usage are in accord with Modern physics in being based on the QUANTUM “BOTH/AND” LOGIC based coming from the assumption of an all-including FLUID PLENUM within which the FORMS which comprise the world dynamic are RELATIONAL FORMS which are inegral to the all-including flow aka the WAVE-FIELD or ‘the Tao’, akin to ‘whorlings in the all-including flowing’.

The QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE based worldview of Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta cultures is is LESS SIMPLE than the BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE based worldview of WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS in the same way that the concept of KAIROS differs from the concept of CHRONOS.  CHRONOS is the TIME of the LOCAL, EXPLICIT, EGO, while KAIROS is the TIME of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT SOUL.  In terms of MODERN PHYSICS, CHRONOS is the “REAL” component of the complex WAVE-FIELD while KAIROS is the “IMAGINARY” component of the complex WAVE-FIELD; i.e.

KAIROS = the understanding of the world and who we are are and what we are doing in the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC based sense of reality wherein we are included in something greater than ourselves so that our understanding of who we are and what we are doing comprehends that we are ‘going with the flow’ whether we like it or not so that our construction is of a simplified substitute world wherein we portray ourselves as the LOCAL AUTHORS of our actions and developments, as if in a TIME-BASED progression. KAIROS is our awareness of inclusion in something beyond our control which can open up and close down opportunity in which case our personal achievements are NOT based ONE-SIDEDLY on our MALE-ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, but depend on the TIDES IN THE AFFAIRS OF MAN that, taken at the flood, can lead on to fortune; i.e. the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD that is in CONJUGATE RELATION with MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS can OPEN UP and ACCOMMODATE/ENABLE our MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS AND GREATLY AMPLIFY/EMBELLISH THEM.

CHRONOS = the understanding of the world and who we are and what we are doing in the SIMPLE, BINARY LOGIC based sense of a LANGUAGE-based pseudo-reality wherein we portray ourselves as the LOCAL AUTHORS of our own ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS, as if we are ABSOLUTELY EXISTING material forms within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE where our actions and development unfold in TEMPORAL SEQUENCE (CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER), this SIMPLIFIED INTELLECTUAL CHRONOS view arising from BINARY LOGIC based LINGUISTIC FRAGMENTATION of REALITY.  Note that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ is a CHRONOS view wherein things are seen as changing PROGRESSIVELY’over TIME’.  This is a VOYEUR VIEW wherein SUBJECT and OBJECT are understood as TWO.  In reality we are included in TRANSFORMATION wherein as Shroedinger expounds,“SUBJECT and OBJECT ARE ONLY ONE!”.

The phrase “To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose”  expresses that which in Modern physics would be termed the COMPLEX (REAL and IMAGINARY) WAVE-FIELD components of reality, the SEASON referring to our sense-experience of being included in a world wherein “There is a tide in the affairs of men, Which taken at the flood, leads on to fortune. Omitted, all the voyage of their life is bound in shallows and in miseries. On such a full sea are we now afloat. And we must take the current when it serves, or lose our ventures”.   — Shakespeare, Julius Caesar.

In simple terms, WE ARE INCLUDED IN SOMETHING GREATER THAN OURSELVES SO THAT WE ARE NOT THE SIMPLE MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AUTHORS OF “OUR OWN” LOCAL EXPLICIT ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, but, as in the manner of drivers in the FLOW of freeway traffic, our movements are relative to the opening of co-created corridors of opportunity, the continuing transforming of which we are included contributors within, but not in ‘control of’.  This is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE in our WAVE-FIELD REALITY.

But we can, if we choose (as is the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE SUPPORTED HABIT), to think of ourselves in the CHRONOS based terms of ‘independent beings with our own self-sourced powers of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development’ in which case we IGNORE our REAL KAIROS based ROLE as PARTICIPANTS IN THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, … a participation in that which is greater than ourselves by way of our being included in the all-including TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which is influenced by (all of) our relative actions and developments.  To the extent that WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ LANGUAGE-constrained THINKING that is in the BINARY LOGIC based terms of INDEPENDENT BEINGS that move about and interact in a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY, INFINITE SPACE, as in a CHRONOS based dynamic, we become prisoners of a BINARY LOGIC based way of being in the world that is the source of FRAGMENTATION, as Bohm is pointing out.

So, this PREFACE has been included as a reminder of our being included in the all-including TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD, an inclusion that is OBSCURED when we employ our TOO-SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE which is fully capable of constructing ‘pseudo-realities’ based on material forms and their actions and interactions as if in absolute empty and infinite space, … a linguistic conceptualizing approach that is OBSCURANTIST in that once we employ LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS based on SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC actions and developments, the communication need has been filled and there is no longer any ‘OPENING’ to bring into play LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION such as;‘To everything there is a season and a time to every purpose’.

That is, once we say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ wherein we make no mention of the conjugate SHRINKING of WILDERNESS, our one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY SIMPLIFICATION, which implies ‘WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE’ which provides a non-participating ‘container’ for the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALZING ONLY ACTION and DEVELOPMENT, the understanding is COMPLETE albeit in an INCOMPLETE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC SENSE (in the sense of Goedel’s Theorem of INCOMPLETENESS of all finite systems of BINARY LOGIC)..

Once we accept the BINARY LOGIC PROPOSITION (recall Goedel’s Theorem that all finite logical propositions are INCOMPLETE) that ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’, OUR REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION IS AN ESTABLISHED ‘TAKE-AWAY’, … been there, know that’, … which in the same fell swoop SHUTS OUT (OBSCURES) the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC proposition, ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

“TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” is exemplary of the QUANTUM LOGIC dynamic which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT or in other words ‘RELATIONAL’ (the basic nature of TRANSFORMATION).

Here we can see that in order to architect language to deliver an understanding of reality that is NOT subject to BINARY LOGIC based OBSCURANTISM that DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE as supports ‘the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, we need a LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING scheme that has a BOTH/AND QUANTUM LOGIC capability wherein the material form is a CONDENSATION of the all-including ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM.  This QUANTUM LOGIC relation is captured in the words ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

BUT IN THE EVENT THAT LANGUAGE BASED EXPRESSION STARTS OFF WITH the SIMPLE CONCEPTUALIZATION; ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, we have IMPLICITLY INJECTED the ABSTRACTION of an ABOLUTE EMPTY CONTAINING SPACE.  The words ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ comprise, as Nietzsche pointed out, ‘the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR’ that invents the abstraction of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development.   BUT THERE IS NO “LOCAL AUTHORING” in the REAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE WORLD OF THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM since TRANSFORMATION is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).

Our SENSE-EXPERIENCE does NOT support the SIMPLE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ with its implied LOCAL POWER OF AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, but our INTELLECT is fully capable of such BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACT CONCEPTUALIZATION and also our EMPLOYING of such ABSTRACT CONCEPTUALIZATION as our INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based OPERATIVE REALITY.   Thus, for example, we proceed with the notion that we are GROWING our TOWNS and our AGRICULTURAL and INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS …. WITHOUT ACKNOWLEDGING AT THE SAME TIME, THE CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, in which case what is actually going on is TRANSFORMATION and there is NO SUCH THING IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY (but only in INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION based PSEUDO-REALITY) AS “THE GROWTH OF TOWNS AND THE GROWTH of AGRICULTURAL and INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENTS”, such words EMBODYING THE OBSCURANTISM of DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE that is the IMAGINARY component of the COMPLEX REAL + IMAGINARY WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC.

NOTA BENE:   The NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE IS THE FOUNDATIONAL REALITY WHILE THE LOCAL and EXPLICIT ‘MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS’ are SECONDARY ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ (APPEARANCE), as Bohm, Schroedinger and other Modern Physics interpreters have pointed out.  This is why the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ , which is the KAIROS (to everything there is a season) qualitative INCLUSIONAL understanding, is the first order understanding of reality while the simple CHRONOS (tempus fugit, the linear ‘passage of time’) is the quantitative understanding as in linear duration; ‘we do not have much time left in our lives’.

CHRONOS is the ONE-SIDED (MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING) realm of ‘what things do’ as in ‘done over time’ or CHRONOLOGICALLY as in GROWTH and DEVELOPMENT which is BINARY LOGIC based (were a ‘thing-in-itself’ is EITHER ounger and smaller OR older and larger) which says NOTHING about qualitative or androgynous change.  If we use simple TIME as chronological development, we are using only the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DEVELOPMENT and DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, these two together supporting the LESS SIMPLE dynamic of TRANSFORMATION, which lies beyon reach of GROWTH which is a one-sided dynamic as if transpiring in EMPTY SPACE. KAIROS brings to bear then sense of ‘opportune timing’ which is no longer ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.

To say “the seed sprouts”, is a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING BINARY LOGIC TRUTH which implies ‘in an absolute empty and infinite space which is implies a CHRONOLOGICAL framing giving a LINEAR SEQUENCE of DEVELOPMENTAL EVENTS.   However, our QUALITATIVE sense-experience is our feeling of being included in the arrival of the WARMTH of SPRING and this INCLUSIONAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE is beyond articulation in the SIMPLE TERMS of WHAT THINGS DO or HOW THINGS CHANGE which is all that BINARY LOGIC is capable of.   CONCEPTUALIZATION that involves SENSE-EXPERIENCING OF INCLUSION entails LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC expression such as WITHIN THE SOLAR IRRADIATED INCUBATOR OF THE WARMING SOIL, the seed’s built-in understanding that ‘to everything there is a season and a time to every purpose was invoked so that the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING influence and the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING dynamic unfolded in CONJUGATE SYMBIOTIC RELATION, the OPPORTUNE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONTAINING CONDITION inducing conjugate expression of OPPORTUNE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.  Here we can see the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND RELATION where there is JUST ONE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM within which, a WHORLING or CONDENSATION giving the APPEARANCE of TWO when, in fact, there is only ONE; i.e. the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

ONLY IF WE FOCUS SINGLE-MINDEDLY ON THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE (as if it were floating in absolute empty and infinite space) do we CONTRIVE the LINGUISTIC DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR BINARY LOGIC “LOCAL AUTHOR” based CONCEPTUALIZING of QUOTE/UNQUOTE “REALITY” .

ONCE we start speaking (using LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATION) wherein actions and results develop in a forward in time fashion, as if in an EMPTY SPACE (so that there is no ANDROGYNOUS relation) and employ ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING terms such as GROWTH, we OBSCURE the LESS SIMPLE (YET MORE TRUE) REALITY of ANDROGYNOUS TRANSFORMATION.  While the SIMPLE abstraction of GROWTH goes together with CHRONOS, the LESS SIMPLE concept of TRANSFORMATION goes together with KAIROS.   OVER TIME, so we say, the Colorado River ‘carved out’ the GRAND CANYON, but this PROMOTION of the MALE ASSERTING as the AUTHORING SOURCE, DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING DYNAMIC wherein it was the opening of the valley that seduced the coming together of male rivulets into streams and streams into a “RAGING RIVER” which we then say is the MALE ASSERTING AUTHOR of the CARVING OUT of the GRAND CANYON.  This is a MISTAKE since it is the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING VALLEY that inductively shaped the development of the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING RIVER.   In other words, it is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT that is the mother of the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, as also in the relation between KAIROS and CHRONOS.   

One term — chronos— expresses the fundamental conception of time in measure, the quantity of duration, the length of periodicity, the age of an object or artifact, and the rate of acceleration as applied to identifiable bodies, whether on the surface of the earth or in the firmament beyond.  The questions relevant to this conception of time are; ‘How fast?’, ‘How frequent?’, ‘How old’?’ and the answers to these questions can be given, in principle at least, in cardinal numbers or in terms of limits that approach these numbers.  The other term —kairos— points to a qualitative character of time, to the special position an event or action occupies in a series, to a season when something appropriately happens that cannot happen at any time, but only at ‘that time’, in a time that marks an opportunity which may not recur.  The question especially relevant to kairos time is ‘when?’, ‘At what time?’  ‘Kairos’, or ‘the right time’, as the term is often translated, involves ordinality or the conception of a special temporal position, …  such that what happens benefits from being launched within a propitious, opportune moment for decision and action.

At the end of the day, one can see that QUANTUM LOGIC, like KAIROS, offers a LESS SIMPLE understanding of reality than the more simple BINARY LOGIC. which, like the more simple CHRONOS, offers us ONLY A SIMPLE LINEAR PROGRESSIVE CONCEPTUALIZING OF CHANGE as with GROWTH where the LESS SIMPLE ALTERNATIVE is TRANSFORMATION which takes us from CHRONOS to KAIROS.

We know how CONSTRUCTION ‘works’; i.e. we assume that there is an imaginary thing-in-itself such as a TOWN which is floating around in psychological empty space , naked and without any landscape to situate itself within, so that BUILDERS are given PLANS of the TOWN as if it will be possible to construct the TOWN and sit it down on top of the LANDSCAPE so that we do not have to admit to the true (sense-experience affirmed) reality wherein the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is the PRIMARY REALITY and thus there is no such thing as the CONSTRUCTION of a TOWN, but there is instead, “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, and this “TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” is an ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING that we ourselves are included in.

So, while CHRONOS goes with SIMPLE GROWTH and BINARY LOGIC, KAIROS goes with LESS SIMPLE TRANSFORMATION and QUANTUM LOGIC.

“TO EVERY THING THERE IS A SEASON AND A TIME TO EVERY PURPOSE” affirms that it is only NATURAL to accept that WE ARE NOT INDEPENDENT BEINGS IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE as our BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE HABIT leads us to believe and which has as ASSERTING DIRECTLY OUT OF OUR NOTIONAL LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS, but given that we are INCLUSIONS in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, it ‘makes sense’ for us to let our actions be shaped by the potentials for us to cultivate resonance in our relations within the world we share inclusion.

RECALL that Chronos is the time of the LOCAL, EXPLICIT Ego while Kairos is the time of the NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT Soul. While CHRONOS “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE KAIROS EMBODIES IT.  That is, CHRONOS and KAIROS are related in the same manner as the REAL and IMAGINARY components of the COMPLEX WAVE-FIELD.   

* * * * * * END OF PREFACE * * * * * * * 

How a ‘death in the family’ is transformation (quantum both/and logic) rather than a ‘loss’ (binary either/or logic) in accord with modern physics and indigenous aboriginal, Buddhist/Taoist and Advaita Vedanta understanding.

This understanding that the world dynamic is that of our inclusion in an all-including transforming relational continuum is consistent with Modern physics and indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.

The indigenous aboriginal aphorism ‘mitakuye oyasin’ (everything is related) captures the Modern physics understanding of reality as an all-including, continually transforming, ENERGY-CHARGE-PLENUM (David Bohm), otherwise known as the WAVE-FIELD in which material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD, so that we, ourselves, as CONDENSATIONS of the ONE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD are QUANTUM LOGIC features that GATHER and SCATTER within the WAVE-FIELD, rather than ABSOLUTE MATERIAL BEINGS that move around and interact within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which is the BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have built into our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.

Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING, because it is BINARY LOGIC based, acknowledges ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE so that we speak, for example, in terms such as ‘the TOWN is growing’ (male asserting/actualizing only) without acknowledging the conjugate ‘shrinking of WILDERNESS’ (female accommodating/enabling conjugate).

In the WESTERN CULTURE over-simplistic BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZING of ‘REALITY’ that we have given the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, we speak in the BINARY LOGIC terms of BIRTH and DEATH, rather than in the Modern physics consistent QUANTUM LOGIC terms of CONDENSATION and ASSIMILATION wherein there are relational features that GATHER and SCATTER in the all-including fluid continuum (the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka WAVE-FIELD).

The QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY is the REALITY as we know it from our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion therein as affirmed in our Modern physics understanding where, as Bohm (coming from modern physics) , ‘systems scientists’, and others are emphasizing;

“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.”  — David Bohm

We live “in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

“Imagine there’s no countries It isn’t hard to do” —John Lennon, ‘IMAGINE’

(more…)