PREFACE:  Nature’s dynamic, as understood in Modern physics and in indigenous aboriginal culture, has a WAVE-like CONJUGATE make-up with both FEMALE accommodating and MALE asserting components.  However, WESTERN CULTURE language architecture REDUCES this CONJUGATE REALITY to a SIMPLER one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE SUBSTITUTE REALITY with the help of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  While the capture of natural WAVE-FIELD (Female-Male-conjugate) phenomena is accommodated in the flow-based languages of indigenous aboriginal and Modern physics (Quantum Logic), WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European languages (Whorf’s classification) ARTIFICIALLY REDUCE language-based REALITY REPRESENTATIONS to a ONE-SIDED, MALE-ASSERTIVE AUTHORING BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY REPRESENTATION.  As Nietzsche has pointed out, by giving a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE IN LANGUAGE to the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR we establish the ABSTRACTION of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.

While this DOUBLE ERROR REDUCTION SIMPLIFIES language based representation of reality …. BY INTRODUCING A SIMPLIFIED MALE-ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY (e.g. a prime example is ‘the EARTH TURNS ROUND’ which splits apart MATTER and SPACE), there are side-effects of confusion from the DROP-OUT of the FEMALE aspect which can include schizophrenia and paranoia, as has been pointed out by David Bohm.   Obvious examples of the DROP OUT of the FEMALE (accommodating) aspect include the ‘Thin Skull Rule in WESTERN LAW which holds a person fully responsible for AUTHORING of injury as if it derived from the MALE ASSERTIVE ACTION, ignoring the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate.  Another example is the imputing of AUTHORSHIP of a forest fire to a person who has discarded a cigarette butt, which under most circumstances would have no significant effect, such effect being driven by the FEMALE conjugate to a far greater degree than by the MALE ‘trigger’.’

While the reduction to the MALE ASSERTIVE conjugate DOES SIMPLIFY language based representation of REALITY, … what is being REPRESENTED is NO LONGER “REALITY” but is instead manufacturing a MALE ASPECT ONLY “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”   The UTILITY of this WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE REDUCTION of REALITY to the MALE-ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY comes from its enabling the construction of reality representations that are LOCAL and EXPLICIT, since it is the FEMALE CONJUGATE reality aspect that opens up into the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  For e example, it is simpler to speak of ‘the AVALANCHE’ as a MALE ASSERTIVE pile of rocks crashing down the mountain and destroying the TOWN than to included a description of the OPENING OF A HOLE in the LANDSCAPE which then draws the description into the overall TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE which is the combination of both the FEMALE OPENING and the MALE ASSERTING.  WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE incorporates this REDUCTION TO THE MALE CONJUGATE in order to SIMPLIFY language based representation by selectively EXTRACTING a LOCAL, EXPLICIT FRAGMENT in the manner of a photographic SNAPSHOT which is NOT ONLY no longer ‘included’ in the transforming relational continuum but which, with the aid of GRAMMAR, can become the LOCAL STUB or CENTERPIECE for constructing a new language based SUBSTITUTE REALITY in which case we LET GO OF the natural platform of the transforming relational continuum, and replace it with an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.

This SUBSTITUTE REALITY, by its substitution of an ABSOLUTE SPACE REFERENCE FRAME, serves up an artificial INDEPENDENCE from the transforming relational continuum so that our language-triggered psychological perception displays only the local fragment and ITS GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT, … dissolving the memory of inclusion in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  This DISENCUMBERING FRAGMENTING greatly SIMPLIFIES constructing language based representation of, for example, TOWNING AS AS INTRINSICALLY INCLUDED WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, however, we are then obliged to come up with our own means of ANIMATING this FRAGMENT we are SYNTHETICALLY LIBERATING within our new SUBSTITUTE REALITY that sports a new ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.  The LOCAL FIGURE is now INDEPENDENT and SEPARATE FROM THE GROUND so that we can use language and grammar to manage the GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION as if LOCALLY AUTHORED by the liberated figure; i.e. “THE TOWN” in the EMPTY EUCLIDEAN SPACE, formerly understood as (and remains in indigenous aboriginal languages as in Modern physics as) “the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.”.

This WESTERN CULTURE language architecture, which reduces relational forms in the flow with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to ‘make them out to be’ LOCAL AUTHORS of actions and development within a new SUBSTITUTE REALITY, while it greatly SIMPLIFIES language based representation of REALITY —CORRECTION — What is going on is not the development of a SIMPLIFIED REPRESENTATION but the introduction of a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY wherein ‘the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ has been synthetically CHOPPED OUT of the transforming relational continuum and RE-INVENTED as a LOCAL, INDEPENDENTLY EXISTING THING-IN-iTSELF with its own GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS of AUTHORING actions and development.  The EMPTY SPACE we have installed this ABSTRACT new TOWN in is lacking the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING qualities that come with the TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM which means that we must now present the MALE as being the FULL AND SOLE LOCAL AUTHOR OF ITS OWN ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.   This is why, in this WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, we have come up with the THIN-SKULL RULE in LAW that establishes the one-sided MALE AUTHOR of the injury,  and the identification of the careless smoker as the one-sided MALE AUTHOR of the forest fire.

Note that these problems are arising from our project of FRAGMENTING REALITY so that we can capture it in our DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based language architecture and thus be able to share and discuss representations of reality from experiences or potential experiences of the past present or as may develop in the future.  This language-capturing, rather than ‘capturing a fragment of ineffable-because-nonlocal-and-implicit reality’, is INVENTING a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which is LOCAL AND EXPLICIT which is, in WAVE-FIELD terms, a reduction of he MALE-FEMALE CONJUGATE WAVE-FIELD, to the MALE COMPONENT ONLY since this is where the SIMPLIFICATION comes from since the MALE aspect is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and thus EFFABLE while the FEMALE aspect is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.  As Lao Tzu suggests; “Know the male.
But keep the role of the female.”

IN THIS PREFACE, the problem is being raised that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have developed and are using a language architecture that avoids the direct attempt to capture explicit representations of reality (IMPOSSIBLE since everything is in flux) and instead orients to the inventing of a SUBSTITUTE REALITY that CAN BE REPRESENTED in LOCAL and EXPLICIT terms; e.g.  the AVALANCHE instead of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  The AVALANCHE is a LOCAL CONCEPT that involves movement of rocks relative to a fixed reference frame which is in effect a SUBSTITUTE REALITY which REPLACES the sense-experience reality of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum.  While the AVALANCHE appears to be ‘out in front of us’, TRANSFORMATION is ALL-INCLUDING and CANNOT therefore be captured by language-based propositions that serve up VOYEUR viewable pictures to be understood as FRAGMENTS of reality.  While the TRANSFORMING CONTINUUM includes “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, our habit is to use language to fabricate a SUBSTITUTE REALITY that features ‘the TOWN’ that we use GRAMMAR to equip with its own (notional) POWERS OF AUTHORING actions and development. It’s not that this SUBSTITUTE REALITY representation is not a potentially valuable tool, the problem is as Emerson has put it; ‘the TOOL has been running away with the workman, the human with the divine”  We DO NOT LIVE IN THAT SUBSTITUTE REALITY, WE LIVE IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, but we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE MISTAKENLY EMPLOYING THE SIMPLIFIED MALE-CONJUGATE ONLY “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”; i.e. this language TOOL consisting of NAMING instantiated ‘local things in themselves’ with GRAMMAR-given powers of AUTHORING actions and development’, AS OUR “OPERATIVE REALITY”.  This is our WESTERN CULTURE CRAZY-MAKER!

ANTHROPOGENIC GLOBAL WARMING is exemplary of this aberrant practice of imputing LOCAL AUTHORSHIP by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.  As inclusions in the transforming relational continuum, relational forms-in-the-flow including us ANTHROPOIDS are innately without LOCAL AUTHORING POWER, our contributions to the world dynamic coming through the web of relations that ‘are us’, a ‘web of relations’ as associates with condensations within the electromagnetic field as understood with QUANTUM LOGIC rather than BINARY LOGIC.  Thus “things” are NOT the source of relations as would imply a BINARY LOGIC containing space separate from the things contained, but relations are the source of things as in QUANTUM LOGIC.

 

* * *   …. end of PREFACE …

 

 

Our Interpreting of COVID 19 as an ATTACKING PATHOGEN follows the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED CONSTRAINT of expressing EVERYTHING in MALE-ASSERTIVE TERMS, avoiding like the plague, the FEMALE aspect.

 

For example, WESTERN JUSTICE convicts people of AUTHORING the forest fire by carelessly discarding a cigarette butt, as if this act is the CAUSE of the fire, a proposition that is ALL MALE and NO FEMALE; i.e. fails to take into consideration the FEMALE RESPONSE or RECEPTIVENESS to the ‘MALE’ HOT POKER assertion which in the rainy season gets ZERO response.  In other words, the condition of the forest as the recipient of the spark is the major influence as to what manifests.

 

This IGNORING of the FEMALE CONJUGATE is characteristic of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.  Instead of TRANSFORMATION as where the contours of the valley SEDUCTIVELY GATHER runoff waters into creeks, streams and then the powerful river, we CREDIT THE MALE RIVER with CARVING OUT THE CANYON when it was the FEMALE VALLEY itching to get her bottom scratched that was the REAL source of the dynamic.

 

So, it is evident that TRANSFORMATION involves FEMALE and MALE conjugates.  Without the inductive gathering organization of the FEMALE VALLEY which harnesses and directs the gravitational field, there would be no MALE ASSERTIVE RIVER, carving out canyons.  TRANSFORMATION entails both FEMALE and MALE conjugates, … HOWEVER, WHILE EASTERN LANGUAGES CAPTURE THIS IN THEIR FLOW-BASED LANGUAGES, WESTERN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES REDUCE THE NATURAL FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE DYNAMIC OF TRANSFORMATION TO ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTIVE ACTION SUCH AS “GROWTH”, ”DEVELOPMENT” AND “PRODUCTION”.

(more…)