“Die Philosophie ist ein Kampf gegen die Verhexung  unsres Verstandes durch die Mittel unserer Sprache” (Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of our language.)” – Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations

 

AUTHOR’S PREFACE:

This article reviews how LANGUAGE is the ROOT SOURCE of FRAGMENTATION in the dynamics of our Common Average European language speaking social collective, a dysfunction that has spread through the world with the spread of English and other European languages.  This FRAGMENTATION is NOT a pervasive problem in those indigenous aboriginal social collectives that have retained their indigenous languages as their first language.

A language-based representation of our sense-experience reality requires a language architecture with a QUANTUM LOGIC foundation.  BINARY LOGIC is insufficient (it is innately SIMPLER than QUANTUM LOGIC).

Where BINARY LOGIC splits FIGURE and GROUND (matter and space) into TWO so that we see the material FIGURE as moving through the EMPTY GROUND (space),…

QUANTUM LOGIC comprehends FIGURE and GROUND as ONE so that we understand the FIGURE (matter) as being a CONDENSATION of the electromagnetic WAVE-FIELD (ground).  The empty space was part of the BINARY LOGIC simplifying abstraction which is not needed in the QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD.

Our COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN language architecture tends to DISTORT REALITY by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE CONJUGATE of the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD dynamic and substituting an ABSOLUTE, EMPTY and INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE. The loss of the FEMALE CONJUGATE leads to one-sided MALE-ASSERTIVE REPRESENTATIONS which are source of FRAGMENTATION.

* * *      * * *      * * *

 

 

 

What Benjamin Whorf classifies as the Common Average European (CAE) Languages contain within them the seeds of FRAGMENTATION, and this note is written to ELUCIDATE on how this occurs.

The LANGUAGE-based FRAGMENTATION problem, which David Bohm points out is not constrained to FRAGMENTING ‘what goes on out there’ in the dynamics of the social collective, but also ‘what goes on IN HERE’ and can be the source of SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA.

AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS LANGUAGE-BASED FRAGMENTATION IS BINARY LOGIC.

Since we are right now using that particular form of language (CAE) that we could say is INFECTED with this PITFALL that we may or may not FALL INTO, it is a bit tricky to explain WITH this CAE language because the nature of the FRAGMENTATION problem is that important information is DROPPED OUT because of our desire for SIMPLIFICATION in our language-based REPRESENTATION.

This SIMPLIFICATION is NOT FOUND in indigenous aboriginal language or in FLOW-BASED (relational) languages, which is why David Bohm suggested that we CAE language users needed to switch to A NEW LANGUAGE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE such as the flow-based design he called Rheomode.  Meanwhile, he discovered that the indigenous aboriginal languages ALREADY EMPLOYED THE FLOW-BASED (NON-FRAGMENTING) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.

My goal in this note is to TAKE THE READER DIRECTLY TO THE ROOT SOURCE OF THE FRAGMENTATION TRAP WHICH IS OUR USE OF WHAT NIETZSCHE HAS LABELLED “THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR” which INFUSES FRAGMENTATION into our rhetoric with the imputing of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development.

WARNING: This language architecture I am right now using employs this DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR but I am going to try to do a work-around in my manner of expressing things.

(more…)