WHO IS IN CHARGE OF OVERSEEING THE CORRECTNESS OF THE LANGUAGE WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE USING?

 

WHOEVER IT IS, I HAVE A COMPLAINT: because WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ARE BEING STUCK WITH A “TOO-SIMPLE AND UNREALISTIC” BEING-BASED LANGUAGE WHILE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS AND MODERN PHYSICS USERS “LUCKED OUT” WITH THEIR POPULARIZED USE OF “LESS SIMPLE AND MORE REALISTIC” VERB-BASED LANGUAGE which addresses the fact that EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX (as Heraclitus correctly observed and Modern physics has affirmed)..

 

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, BECAUSE OF OUR TOO SIMPLE “BEING-BASED LANGUAGE” ARE CONFRONTED WITH THE ISSUE THAT HERACLITUS ADDRESSED BUT WHICH WESTERN CULTURE, BY FOLLOWING THE SIMPLIFIED “BEING-BASED LANGUAGE” DESIGN OF PARMENIDES, CONTINUES TO SCREW-UPON.  THE FACT IS THAT IT IS A SCREW-UP TO GIVE A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO “BEING” IN LANGUAGE DESIGN BECAUSE, FOR EXAMPLE, BY ASSIGNING THE “BEING-BASED” NAMES “MOUNTAIN AND VALLEY” to those familiar features, rather than going with VERBS such as MOUNTAINING and VALLEYING, WE OPEN THE DOOR TO STATEMENTS SUCH AS “THE AVALANCHE CRASHED DOWN THE SIDE OF THE MOUNTAIN AND CAME TO REST IN THE VALLEY BELOW”, … THUS OPENING THE CAN OF WORMS THAT “THE MOUNTAIN IS NO LONGER THE SAME MOUNTAIN AND THE VALLEY IS NO LONGER THE SAME VALLEY”.

 

We recognize in this, Heraclitus’ “EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX” observation; “No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it’s not the same river and he’s not the same man.”

 

EVERY TIME WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS USE INCOMPLETE-BECAUSE BEING-BASED LANGUAGE SUCH AS “THE AVALANCHE CRASHED DOWN THE MOUNTAINSIDE”, we are INTRODUCING THE CONFUSION that comes with GOEDEL’S THEOREM of the “INCOMPLETENESS OF ALL FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS”, … and the INCOMPLETENESS is that WHILE OUR POSITIVE (ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING) STATEMENT IS “TRUE”, it is as the same time “INCOMPLETE” because it is IMPOSSIBLE TO HAVE AN AVALANCHE CRASH DOWN THE MOUNTAINSIDE WITHOUT LEAVING A BIG HOLE  IN THE MOUNTAINSIDE SUCH THAT “THE MOUNTAIN IS NO LONGER THE SAME MOUNTAIN”.

 

BY USING A “BEING” BASED LANGUAGE IN A REALITY WHEREIN EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX, WE ARE INTRODUCING WHAT NIETZSCHE CALLS “THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR” which  SIMULATES “UNREAL LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT” in a world where our SENSE-EXPERIENCE IS INFORMING US THAT EVERYTHING IS INCONTINUING FLUX SO THAT IT IS A MISTAKE TO DESIGN OUR LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME WITH “THE BUILT-IN LOCAL AUTHORING FALSEHOOD”.   WE ARE LIVING WITHIN AN ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM WHEREIN “EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX” WHEREIN…. THERE IS NO “LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT”.

 

THAT WE LIVE WITHIN A TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM IS THE UNDERSTANDING OF MODEN PHYSICS and OF INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS AND ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS, …. BUT, FOR US WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS,…WE HAVE CHOSEN TO DEVELOP A LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME THAT SIMPLIFIES AND REDUCES OUR REAL SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY, … TO AN UNREAL INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION BASED PSEUDO-REALITY GROUNDED IN THE BINARY LOGIC BASED CONCEPT OF “BEING” THAT SUPPORTS THE BOGUS CONCEPT OF “LOCAL AUTHORING” WHICH WE USE TO CREATE A “FRAGMENTED, BEING-BASED PSEUDO-REALITY”, A BOGUS PSEUDO-REALITY THAT HAS “TAKEN OVER” AND IS NOW SHAPING WESTERN CULTURE IMPRESSIONS OF WHAT WE PURPORT TO BE “REALITY” WHICH IS “NOT REALITY” BUT A FRAGMENTATION BASED SUBSTITUTE PSEUDO-REALITY.

  (more…)