COMPOSITE OF RECENT ‘SUMMARY’ POSTS

 

 

From: emiliano@goodshare.org <emiliano@goodshare.org>
Sent: October 29, 2022 1:32 PM
Subject: SIMPLE SUMMARY of The COMMON THREAD IN THIS LONG CHAIN OF MESSAGES: OUR WESTERN CULTURE SCREW-UP IN A NUTSHELL

 

MAKE NO MISTAKE:  OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE IS OUR MAJOR SCREW-UP BECAUSE IT REDUCES THE REPRESENTATOIN OF THE WAVE-FIELD NATURE OF REALITY BY SPLITTING APART THE FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING AND MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJGUATES AND DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE CONJUGATE SO THAT OUR LANGUAGE DOES NOT ‘CAPTURE’ REPRESENTATIONS OF SENSE-EXPERIENCE RELIATY, BUT INSTEAD FABRICATES A SUBSTITUTE REALITY BASED ON THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE ONLY.  THIS PUTS OUR LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS “AT ODDS WITH” OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE.  AS BOHM OBSERVES, THIS IS THE SOURCE OF SCHIZOPHRENIA AND PARANOIA IN WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS.

 

The world of WESTERN CULTURE language representations is CONSISTENT for all the users of our REALITY-DISTORTING LANGUAGE REPRESENTATIONS which means this language WORKS as a SUBSTITUTE-REALITY BASED COORDINATING TOOL for its users.  Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED CONSTRUCTIONS OF A SIMPLIFIED (MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE ONLY) SUBSTITUTE REALITY, while a GROSS DISTORTION of sense-experience reality, are THE SAME FOR ALL LANGUAGE USERS thus the SIMPLIFIED (DISTORTED) SUBSTITUTE REALITY implied by the language, EVEN THOUGH IT IS “AT ODDS WITH” our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, PROVIDES A “CONSISTENT” REFERENCE FOR THE USER BASE OF WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS.

Thus, everyone who speaks English is ON THE SAME PAGE while speaking in terms of the “the TOWN that is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods”, … because everyone in the LANGUAGE USER GROUP is ‘going along’ with the abstract notion of a MALE-ASSERTING ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY, … which IS IN CONTRADICTION with the sense-experience reality as captures in INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES and in the language of MODERN PHYSICS which acknowledges the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD NATURE of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY where on speaks in terms of “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.

 

If we pause to consider the difference between these two language based representations, we can imagine a large screen film display of TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE which shows the TOWN developing  WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE AS AN INTEGRAL (INSEPARABLE) FEATURE OF THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE illustrating the QUANTUM LOGIC “BOTH/AND” relationship; i.e. the TOWNING is BOTH a distinguishable FEATURE and AT THE SAME TIME, the GROUND IT IS MADE OF, this FIGURE and GROUND as ONE relation IS THE QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY which we capture in language with the words ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” and this is how it is done in the indigenous aboriginal language architecture; i.e. the representation is QUANTUM LOGIC based.

 

But in our WESTERN CULTURE VIEWING, and subsequent LANGUAGE CAPTURE, … there is a tendency for us to NOT SEE THE FOREST FOR THE TREES, or in other words, to DIFFERENTIATE the scene in the mathematical sense of DIFFERENTIATION where we DROP OUT the overall relational landscape continuum so as to FOCUS IN AND ‘ABSTRACT OUT’ what we may think of as the LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONTENT and as in MATHEMATICAL DIFFERENTIATION, if we WANT TO REVERSE BACK OUT OF OUR DIFFERENTIATION, by RE-INTEGRATION into the FULL CONTINUUM, all we have that remains of the NON-LOCAL and IMPLICIT character of the PRE-DIFFERENTIATED FULLBLOWN REALITY, is a CONSTANT which is like a note in the margin that preserves the DROPPED OUT DETAIL in one LUMP SUM.  The point is that ONCE WE DIFFERENTIATED so as to focus in the MALE-ASSERTING LOCAL AND EXPLICIT ASPECTS, we do so at the EXPENSE of DROPPING OUT the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE ASPECT.

 

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE has oriented to the LOCAL AND EXPLICIT aspect of WAVE-FIELD REALITY, DROPPING OUT the NONLOCAL and IMPLCIIT FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD PLENUM.   WHILE THIS SIMPLIFIES THE WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE SCHEME, the resultant ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING REPRESENTATION, as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING’, … has ABSTRACTLY REDUCED the reality of our sense-experience of inclusion therein, to a VOYEURIZABLE MALE-ASSERTING MATERIAL EFFIGY wherein we substitute a notional CONTAINER of ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS for the FEMALE LANDSCAPE CONTINUUM.  As far a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE GOES, this SIMPLIFIES the problem of REPRESENTATION because it DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and that has and continues to characterize our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.  Because this ARTIFICIALLY SPLITS US APART FROM THE REALITY WE ARE INCLUDED IN, as David Bohm points out, our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is the source of FRAGMENTATION which leads to SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA.

 

The INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURE, consistent with Modern physics, has developed a language architecture without the DIFFERENTATION that reduces the landscape to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.  This is a language that preserves the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT character of WAVE-FIELD reality wherein the MALE ASSERTING ACTION is rooted in the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD PLENUM.  THE MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT AS IN “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products”, … is NOT REALITY but a DERIVATIVE of REALITY.  REALITY is the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD and only by the ABSTRACTION of DIFFERENTIATION wherein WE USE DIFFERENCING TO EXTRACT THE MALE ASSERTING FEATURES FROM THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING GROUND, do we get the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE SYSTEM where the DIFFERENTIATED ARTIFACTS are PROMOTED TO PRIMARY REALITY STATUS  so that LANGUAGE-BASED REALITY is equated to the PRODUCT OF DIFFERENTIATION.

 

SO, INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE (consistent with Modern physics) DOES NOT USE DIFFERENTATION to REDUCE and SIMPLIFY SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY down to a DIFFERENTIATED SUBSTITUTE REALITY that DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.  For example, the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE employs the QUANTUM LOGIC expression “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” whereas the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE uses a DIFFERENTIATED SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE which is extracted from WAVE-FIELD REALITY by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING conjugate.  That is, by differentiating the LANDSCAPE-CONTINUUM which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, we can obtain the LOCAL and EXPLICIT DETAIL such as “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products”.

 

WHAT THIS REDUCTION DOES IS TO GIVE SYNTHETIC AUTHORING POWERS TO THE DIFFERENTIATED LOCAL AND EXPLICIT product of the DIFFERENTIATION, and when we put these FRAGMENTS TOGETHER, we can only do so MECHANICALLY because we have the HUMPTY DUMPTY FELL OFF THE WALL PROBLEM of having LOST the HOLISTIC SCHEME of things in the FRAGMENTATION.   WHILE THE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURE DID NOT FALL INTO THIS TRAP AND DEVELOPED LANGUAGE that RETAINS the INNATE FLUIDITY of WAVE-FIELD REALITY, WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS OPTED FOR A LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE BASED ON FRAGMENTING REALITY, AND THIS REMAINS A PERSISTING PROBLEM IN THAT OUR LANGUAGE BASED FRAGMENTED REALITY IS MESSING UP OUR WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHE.  As Bohm observes;

 

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

 

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

 

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc

 

This is the CURRENT STATE OF AFFAIRS in our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC; i.e.

 

THE FRAGMENTATION WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE BUILT INTO OUR LANGUAGE WITH THE DROP-OUT OF THE FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE IS DRIVING US NUTS!

 

THIS PROBLEM CAN BE EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF THE DROPPING OUT OF QUANTUM LOGIC AND THE SUBSTITUTING OF BINARY LOGIC.  THIS IS A MAJOR “DUMBING DOWN” OF OUR LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS.

 

ONCE WE HAVE ‘DUMBED REALITY DOWN’ TO ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING AND PRODUCING products”, WE HAVE TO LIVE WITH THE RESULT OF THIS DIFFERENTIATION WHICH CHOPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE TO SERVE UP THE DISCONNECTED FRAGMENTS; I.E. THETIDY AND CLEAN MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS “ON THEIR OWN”, THIS DIFFERENTIATED AND FRAGMENTED RESULT, IN ORDER TO PRESERVE THE NEWLY ACQUIRED INDEPENDENT BEING STATUS, HAVING TO MOVE INTO A CONTAINING SPACE THAT WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THIS FRAGMENTATION; I.E. A NEW ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE (PHEW!  THERE GOES THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONTAINER, MELTED DOWN LIKE THE WICKED WITCH OF THE WEST). HELLO AND WELCOME, EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT)

 

OF COURSE, WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS HAVE GIVEN UP THE MAZE OF CONNECTING RELATIONS THAT MAKES SENSE OF THINGS IN ORDER TO DO THIS LINGUISTIC FRAGMENTATION, SO HOW WOULD WE EVER PUT HUMPTY BACK TOGETHER AGAIN IF WE NEEDED A DEFRAGMENTED UNDERSTANDING.   THAT IS A GOOD QUESTION BECAUSE THE CONSTANT ‘C’ OF INTEGRATION DOES NOT OFFER US THE DETAILS WE WOULD NEED IN ORDER TO RECONSTITUTE A DEFRAGMENTED ORIGINAL REALITY.

 

OK, OUR LANGUAGE GIVES US THE TOWN AS A LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF AND A HISTORY OF ‘ITS DEVELOPMENT’, BUT WHAT WE WILL NEED IN ORDER TO RECOVER  THE SENSE-EXPERIENCE CONSISTENT REALITY, IS ALL THE INGREDIENTS THAT SUPPORT THE “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” WHICH IS GROUNDED IN THE NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT (RELATIONAL) WHICH IS THE BASIC NATURE OF WAVE-FIELD REALITY.

 

WE HAVE BURNED OUR BRIDGES WITH OUR WESTERN CULTURE MALE-ASSERTING FRAGMENTATION BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY.  HAVING DEVELOPED A DEPENDENCY ON THE DIFFERENTIATED FRAGMENT SUCH AS ‘THE TOWN’ SEEN AS A LOCAL, EXPLICIT, THING-IN-ITSELF WITH ITS OWN GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS SUCH AS GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT, … WE ARE SCREWED AS FAR AS RE-INTEGRATING THIS  FRAGMENT INTO THE FULLBLOWN RELATIONAL LANDSCAPE; I.E. THE FULLBLOWN WAVE-FIELD.  WE ARE IN A SIMILAR PLIGHT TO THE MAN IN THE SONG

 

When it gets too hot for comfort

And you can’t get ice cream cone

Tain’t no sins

To take off your skins

And dance around in your bones

 

DIFFERENTIATION removes the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ‘COVER’, but AT THE PRICE OF A LOSS OF ESSENTIAL INFORMATION.  No amount of DETAIL about the GROWTH OF THE TOWN will support the restoration of the REAL SITUATION wherein “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”

 

ALL OF THE PROUD TALK BY THE BRITISH or by the AMERICANS or by the RUSSIANS which employs the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR that supports the abstraction of ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING LOCAL AUTHORING is FRAGMENTATIVE ABSTRACTION based BULLSHIT since the reality is that we all share INCLUSION within the ONE, ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM AKA ‘WAVE-FIELD’.

 

This UNDERSTANDING is NOT NEW.  THIS NON-FRAGMENTED (INTEGRATED) understanding of reality IS THE CENTURIES OLD INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL UNDERSTANDING AND THE UNDERSTANDING OF TAOISM/BUDDHISM AND ADVAITA VEDANTA.

 

CONFUSION is introduced in the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based representation system due to the DROP OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE in that the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based system of REPRESENTATION “SIMPLIFIES REALITY” (or rather, “introduces a simplified SUBSTITUTE REALITY”) featuring the MALE ASSERTING WAVE-FIELD CONJGUATE ON ITS OWN, DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, … so that what appears to be EMPTY SPACE of SECONDARY IMPORTANCE in our language based discourse, is instead the WAVE-FIELD of PRIMARY IMPORTANCE so that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATIONS are reduced to MALE ASSERTING BONES without FEMALE ACCOMMODATING FLESH.

 

INSTEAD OF THE QUANTUM LOGIC “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” , when the flesh comes off and the bones only remain, we have the BINARY LOGIC “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products”, … where the TOWN is the remaining SKELETON when the ENVELOPING FLESH of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is PEELED AWAY to give this FRAGMENT based SKELETAL VIEW, the DIFFERENTITED VIEW OF THE PSEUDO-LOCAL AND EXPLICIT aka the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE-ON-ITS-OWN, WHICH IS NOT REAL AND FROM WHICH WE CAN NEVER RECOVER THE FULLBLOWN ANDROGYNOUS REALITY BECAUSE OUR LANGUAGE ‘FRAGMENTS’ REALITY AND TOSSES OUT THE RELATION FABRIC (THE WAVE-FIELD) THAT IS THE PRIMARY REALITY, LEAVING US WITH THE MESS OF FRAGMENTS WE HAVE CHOPPED OUT WITHOUT THE MEANS TO RESTORE THE WHOLENESS WE CHOPPED THEM OUT OF.

 

THIS IS THE PROBLEM THAT BOHM IS TALKING ABOUT IN HIS ABOVE-CITED COMMENT ON ‘FRAGMENTATION’.

 

DIFFERENTIATION AS IN MATHEMATICS IS WHAT IS HAPPENING IN OUR LANGUAGE BASED CONSTRUCTIONS AND WHEN WE DIFFERENTIATE A MOVING, TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, WE GET STATIC FRAGMENTS WHICH ARE THE ‘GHOSTS’ OF DEPARTED RELATIONAL FORMS WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  THESE ‘FORMS’ ARE ‘APPEARANCES’ THAT WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS USE LANGAUGE TO ‘HANG NAMES ON’ AND THEN EMPLOY GRAMMAR TO IMPUTE TO THESE NAMING-INSTANTIATED FRAGMENTS, ‘THEIR OWN (NOTIONAL) GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, LEADING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF A FRAGMENT BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY.  That is the WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY.

 

The INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE PRESERVES THE ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD NATURE OF REALITY WHICH IS QUANTUM LOGIC based whereby MATERIAL FORMS are understood as CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD, and there is no recourse needed to the abstractions of BINARY LOGIC as associate with MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE MATERIAL OBJECTS IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE.

 

* * *

 

THAT IS WHERE WE CURRENTLY ‘ARE” as Bohm has pointed out.  We are struggling with the mess that our language-based fragmentation of reality is producing.  So our STORY is in the course of continual unfolding.  And there is lots more to the story than mentioned in this brief report, including the role of EGO that comes with the mistaken belief that we are LOCAL AUTHORS OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.  WE ARE NOT!  THAT BOGUS IMPRESSION derives from the DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMAR which is NOT FOUND in relational languages such as the indigenous aboriginal language.  Then there is the belief in the BINARY of EITHER right OR wrong which is another contributor to SCHIZOPHRENIA as where we co-contribute to dissonance in the social dynamic so that as in a crowd dynamic, some poor soul gets pushed over the balcony rail and falls to their death, or some individual becomes the lightning rod for release of relational social collective tensional buildup and is designated by the social collective as the ‘identified patient’, the individual that ‘has the problem’ (hey, we who do not become lightning rod conduits for the release of tensions brewed up in the social collective are fee to wear our NORMAL badges, thanks to the WESTERN CULTURE ‘innocent until proven guilty’ rule which allows our overall social collective to preserve our innocent status indefinitely, provided we volunteer for jury duty so as to put the finger on some poor lightning rod who has become a conduit for the relateas of tensions brewing in the WESTERN CULTURE social collective.

 

* * *

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The COMMON THREAD IN THIS LONG CHAIN OF MESSAGES

 

 

The common thread in this long chain of messages is the search for the root of evident dysfunction in our WESTERN CULTURE which triggered awareness in me, the approximate start of which was my being asked practice writing my résumé in high school, and the advice to embellish it by cherry picking those events which made me ‘look good’.

 

This CHERRY PICKING is something that is made possible by Goedel’s Theorem of the INCOMPLETENESS of all FINITE LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS.   In other words, our LANGUAGE has a SIMPLE ARCHITECTURE that allows us to FRAGMENT our accounts of our sense-experience reality by constructing representations based on FINITE LOGIC PROPOSITIONS where we may say things like; “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products”.  NOTICE THAT that proposition is a DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMAR which implies LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development.

 

This imputing of LOCAL AUTHORING NEVER HAPPENS IN INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES NOR IN MODERN PHYSICS DESCRIPTIONS OF PHYSICAL PHENOMENA, NOR IN THE LINGUISTIC REPRESENTATIONS OF TAOISM/BUDDHISM and ADVAITA VEDANTA, … but “LOGIC AUTHORING” (by way of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR),  is COMMON in the REPRESENTATIONS of Common Average European language constructions.

 

NOTA BENE:   As Benjamin Whorf has shown;  The hypothesis of linguistic relativity, also known as the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis is a principle suggesting that the structure of a language affects its speakers’ worldview or cognition, and thus people’s perceptions are relative to their spoken language.

 

 

We divide into EAST and WEST on the basis of whether the reality we live in is best described by; A or B

 

A:  “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.  This has a QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND LOGIC OF THE INCLUDING MEDIUM representation where ‘The TOWNING’ is a relational feature within the transforming relational landscape’ which implies that FIGURE and GROUND are ONE since the FIGURE is INCLUDED IN THE GROUND like the WHORLING is included in the FLOWING of water in a stream.  The WHORLING is “NOT” a separate THING-IN-ITSELF that is the LOCAL AUTHOR of its own ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT, … the WHORLING is part of the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM AKA THE WAVE-FIELD.    Likewise, the TOWNING is part of the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM AKA THE WAVE-FIELD.

 

B: “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products”.   This is a BINARY LOGIC EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED MEDIUM representation where “The TOWN” is a LOCAL, EXPLICIT, MATERIAL BEING (THING-IN-ITSELF) which is INDEPENDENTLY EXISTING and be thought of as residing in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT (aka EUCLIDEAN SPACE). This TOWN that is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING “IS” A SEPARATE THING-IN-ITSELF that “IS” the LOCAL AUTHOR of its own ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT … THE TOWN IS THE TOWN IS THE TOWN and we understand “IT” as a “LOCAL AND EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF” such that we may put up SIGNS saying “ENTERING TOWN” and “LEAVING TOWN”, advising people that they can MOVE THROUGH this TOWN THING in the same sense as one can “MOVE THROUGH” FRANCE and GERMANY

 

The different between A and B is the difference between QUANTUM LOGIC and BINARY LOGIC.  If we are WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, we will be USING A LANGUAGE based on BINARY LOGIC which supports our believing in INDEPENDENT NATIONS and INDEPENDENT TOWNS, FIGURES which are INDEPENDENT of the GROUND they are situated on; e.g. the TOWN is INDEPENDENT of the LANDSCAPE it is INCLUDED IN, and may speak of THREE TOWNS in the same river valley, dotted along the long snaking river-bank, and our LANGUAGE finds it acceptable to speak of the GROWTH of these TOWNS  even as the SPACE BETWEEN THEM SHRINKS hand-in-hand with THEIR GROWTH, TRANSFORMING THE VALLEY from mostly WILDERNESS to mostly TOWNG.

 

Thanks to our use of BINARY LOGIC in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE REPRESENTATIONS, we can speak of the TOWNS GROWING without any mention of the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS so, … if we are living in this river valley, our SENSE-EXPERIENCE is informing us of something going on which is NOT CAPTURED IN OUR STATEMENTS ABOUT THE GROWTH OF THE TOWNS, which are TRUE STATEMENTS but as Goedel’s Theorem ‘warns us’, ALL FINITE (BINARY) LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS ARE INCOMPLETE.   SO while our LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS ABOUT THE GROWTH OF THE TOWNS ARE TRUE, they are INCOMPLETE in that WE HAVE NEGLECTED ACKNOWLEDGING THAT THERE IS A SHRINKAGE OF WILDERNESS CONJUGATE WITH THE GROWTH OF THE TOWNS.

 

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE GIVES FORTH QUANTUM LOGIC REPRESENTATIONS WHICH DO NOT SUFFER FROM THE INCOMPLETENESS that BINARY LOGIC REPRESENTATIONS DO!

 

We can see difference where we use QUANTUM LOGIC REPRESENTATION SUCH AS ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which captures the SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY THAT ‘EVERYTHING IS IN FLUX’ and there is no use of ABSOLUTE BEING as there is with language such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products’ which implies a NAMING-GIVEN LOCAL BEING with the GRAMMAR GIVEN LOCAL POWERS of GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products.  This abstract construction of the LOCAL AUTHORING DYNAMIC is a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR pointed out by Nietzsche with his example ‘Lightning flashes’, an imputing of LOCAL AUTHORING;

 

 

“Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.”  – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

 

But the ABSTRACTION of the LOCAL AUTHOR permeates WESTERN CULTURE DISCOURSE because of the ubiquitous use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, which distinguishes NOT ONLY WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE from INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURE LANGUAGE but WESTERN CULTURE REALITY from INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURE REALITY.

 

E.G.  WESTERN CULTURE JUSTICE IS BASED ON BINARY LOGIC AND  ACCEPTS LOCAL AUTHORING AS REALITY and has developed a system of REWARDING and PUNISHING on this LOCAL AUTHORING basis.

 

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL JUSTICE IS BASED ON QUANTUM LOGIC AND ACCEPTS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT AUTHORING and has developed a system of attenuating relational dissonance (understood as the problem) and amplifying relational resonance as the solution.  The HEALING CIRCLES are the QUANTUM LOGIC remedy for the outbreak of relational dissonance, whether the dissonance manifests as robbery, rape or murder.  There is NO ASSUMPTION OF LOCAL AUTHORING as in WESTERN CULTURE because LOCAL AUTHORING comes from WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE while INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE, for the same physical events, gives the understanding of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT relational dissonance deriving from TENSIONS in the community web of relations.

 

MODERN PHYSICS SUPPORTS THE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL INTERPRETATION OF ROBBERY, RAPE or MURDER as deriving from tensions and dissonance in the community web of relations since this IS SUPPORTED BY A QUANTUM LOGIC STRUCTURE and the BINARY LOGIC STRUCTURE of WESTERN JUSTICE is NOT SUPPORTED by Modern physics wherein ‘everything is related’  That is, BINARY LOGIC supports the WESTERN CULTURE notion of the INDEPENDENT BEING (created by NAMING) with LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS (created by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMIGN and GRAMMAR).   There is no such thing as LOCAL AUTHORING in the real world of our sense-experience, LOCAL AUTHORING is LANGUAGE BASED ABSTRACTION that is found in WESTERN CULTURE but NOT IN INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURE because of the differences in LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE employed by INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS and WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, as implied by Whorf’s principle;

 

NOTA BENE:   As Benjamin Whorf has shown;  The hypothesis of linguistic relativity, also known as the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis is a principle suggesting that the structure of a language affects its speakers’ worldview or cognition, and thus people’s perceptions are relative to their spoken language.

 

SIMPLY STATED, INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES support an understanding of AUTHORING of actions and developments based on the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (transforming relational continuum) such as THERE IS THIEVING, RAPING and MURDERING IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

 

NOTA BENE:  In the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding, the dynamics of THIEVING, RAPING and MURDERING are only LOCAL and EXPLICIT in their superficial LIGHTNING BOLT manifestation, but this is just APPEARANCE of the same type as a car-crash in a crowd of BUMPER CARS in the amusement park.  YES, when there is a collision that brings things to a local relative standstill, we can use BINARY LOGIC to identify “the perpetrator” and “the victim” but as we know from participating in such games, we are NOT the FULL AND SOLE AUTHORS of the collision because we are a CONDUIT for the expression of RELATIONAL TENSIONS AND INTERACTIONS that are continually brewing up and ‘living’ in the relational dynamic.   The LIGHTNING ROD or CONDUIT of relational tensions IS NOT THE LOCAL AUTHOR OF THE COLLISION and the use of language (the double error of naming and grammar) that is used to depict LOCAL AUTHORING of an action or development DROPS OUT acknowledging the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING OPENING OF CORRIDORS which the driver is sucked into so that LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION IN ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING TERMS which implies MALE ASSERTING LOCAL AUTHORING is OBSCURANTISM since it DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, and that DROP-OUT is coming from LANGUAGE; i.e. from the WESTERN CULTURE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE STRUCTURE which SYSTEMATICALLY DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE  as in the statement CAR 17 crashed into CAR 51, without mention of the BUMPER CAR DYNAMICS that were going on, making it IMPOSSIBLE to separate out the INFLUENCE OF FEMALE ACCOMMODATING OPENING OF CHANNELS and the INFLUENCE  of MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.

 

That NATURAL AMBIGUITY deriving from the ANDROGYNOUS nature of our WAVE-FIELD REALITY is UNNATURALLY REMOVED in the simplified architecture of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which keeps only the MALE ASSERTING and DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING as in the well-known case of the THIN SKULL RULE in WESTERN LAW which enforces the DROPPING OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE (the thin skull that easily collapses) and GIVES FULL AND SOLE ATTRIBUTION OF ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT TO THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE.

 

The COMMON THREAD IN THIS LONG CHAIN OF MESSAGES

 

is thus the following;

 

-1- WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE PUTS BINARY LOGIC (BEING) INTO A FOUNDATIONAL REALITY ROLE AND DROPS OUT QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD REALITY

 

-2- INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE PUTS QUANTUM LOGIC (WAVE-FIELD BALANCE) INTO A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE

 

-3- BINARY LOGIC IS THE SOURCE OF OBSCURANTISM as seen in the THIN SKULL RULE (the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE IS DROPPED OUT)

 

-4- WHORF’S PRINCIPLE explains how the MALE ASSERTING STRUCTURE of WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European LANGUAGES invokes the illusion of LOCAL AUTHORING (there is only TRANSFORMATION)

 

The hypothesis of linguistic relativity, also known as the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis is a principle suggesting that the structure of a language affects its speakers’ worldview or cognition, and thus people’s perceptions are relative to their spoken language. 

 

-5- As Bohm, F. David Peat (BLACKFOOT PHYSICS) have pointed out, indigenous aboriginal languages support QUANTUM LOGIC reality while COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGES support BINARY LOGIC.

 

* * *

 

From the above five points, we can see the basic shortfall in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and the problem is that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE reduces the real QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD world of our sense-experience to an ABSTRACT BINARY LOGIC based MECHANICAL WORLD where MALE ASSERTING RULES and where FEMALE ACCOMMODATING (as is needed to understand WAVE-FIELD REALITY) is DROPPED OUT and EMPTY SPACE is used to form a SUBSTITUTE REALITY featuring one-sided MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS

 

This BINARY LOGIC based world brings us the BINARY LOGIC “The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and producing products”, and REMOVES THE QUANTUM LOGIC “There is TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING”

 

As Bohm points out, our WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVE is suffering from FRAGMENTATION (which is coming from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which imputes LOCAL AUTHORING).

 

The WESTERN CULTURE PURSUIT OF GROWTH as in “THE GROWTH ECONOMY” is instead driving TRANSFORMATION which includes the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS LANDS as is captured in INDIGENOUS ABOIGINAL LANGUAGES but NOT IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE STANDARD AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGES WHICH SUPPORT THE ABSTRACTIONS OF GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION which are AT THE EXPENSE OF DROPPING OUT THE QUANTUM LOGIC AWARENESS OF TRANSFORMATION.

 

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are fuelling TRANSFORMATION while WHAT WE THINK WE ARE DOING IS PROMOTING GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION

 

THE GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION is NOT REAL but it is TRUE and the difference lies in the understanding of Goedel’s Theorem that all finite systems of logic are INCOMPLETE such that our logic that our GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION is advancing is TRUE but INCOMPLETE since we have not mentioned the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS and the two taken together reveal the overall UNFRAGMENTED BY LANGUAGE sense-experience reality of inclusion in the ALL-INCLUDING TRANFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

 

Currently, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are living “believe” we are living in a land where we are the LOCAL, INDEPENDENT AUTHORS OF GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION.  This is the BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITY we have been constructing which we have been employing as our OPERATIVE REALITY and this is putting us on a BUSTRIP TO HELL where we can expect a continually emergin dysfunction.

 

* * *

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LANGUAGE supports REPRESENTATIONS that constitute a RADICAL SIMPLIFICATION of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY.  As Korzybski says; ‘the WORD is NOT THE THING’, … but I have to take exception to that quote from Korzybski because in saying what he said, he gives credence to the EXISTENCE OF THINGS, and his theorizing further reinforces in our minds the legitimacy of the concept of THINGS by inventing CATEGORIES OF THINGS which he labels “THE CLASSES OF LIFE” i.e. ‘The PLANTS as the Chemistry-Binding CLASS OF LIFE, … the ANIMALS as the Space-Binding CLASS OF LIFE, … and HUMANITY as the Time-binding CLASS OF LIFE.

 

My problem with Korzybski’s work, which I think makes a great contribution TO GETTING OUT OF OUR ENTRAPMENT BY LITERAL BELIEF IN THE ‘REALITY’ OF WORD-BASED THINGS, is that his work AT THE SAME TIME, RE-ENTRENCHES US IN BELIEF IN ‘THE THING’ since in saying THE WORD IS NOT THE THING, he implies that THERE ARE THINGS, but that our LANGUAGE is not CAPABLE of CAPTURING THEIR ESSENCE.

 

PROBLEM!   THIS IS A BACK-HANDED AFFIRMATION OF THE EXISTENCE OF “THINGS”, which KORZYBSKI FURTHER AIDS AND ABETS BY HIS “CATEGORIZING OF THINGS” as PLANTS, ANIMALS and HUMANITY.

 

ALL OF THIS FURTHER ENTRENCHES US IN BELIEF IN A WORLD OF MATERIAL THINGS which is AT ODDS with the WAVE-FIELD conception of reality in which there are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD that NEVER MAKE IT TO INDEPENDENT THINGHOOD, but PERSIST as relational forms in the unending fluidity of the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD.

 

KORZYBSKI, by describing CATEGORIES OF THINGS, “CONCRETIZES” the notion of a world POPULATED WITH DIFFERENT THINGS, … which has been the continuing language-supported WORLDVIEW of WESTERN CULTURE, … which conflicts with the WORLDVIEW of EASTERN CULTURE and MODERN PHYSICS.  In the latter ‘modes of understanding’, REALITY IS THE CONTINUALLY TRANSFORMING (FLUID) WAVE-FIELD which is punctuated by RELATIONAL FORMINGS that are NOT LOCAL and are NOT EXPLICIT but as FLOW-FORMS persist as NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) phenomena, in the sense of WHORLS in WATERFLOW wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE and NOT TWO.

 

SO KORZYBSKI, with his CATEGORIES OF “THINGS” CONCRETIZES THESE NOTIONAL ‘THINGS’ by suggesting that their DIFFERING ATTRIBUTES are GROUNDS FOR UNDERSTAND THEM AS ‘DIFFERENT CLASSES OF THINGS’ and once we apply the concept of DIFFERENTIATION to purely fluid forms in the flow, we are in effect REIFYING the FORMINGS IN THE FLOWING by using LANGUAGE to give them a DIFFERENCE based EXISTENCE as with “THE CLASSES OF LIFE” i.e. ‘The PLANTS as the Chemistry-Binding CLASS OF LIFE, … the ANIMALS as the Space-Binding CLASS OF LIFE, … and HUMANITY as the Time-binding CLASS OF LIFE.  

 

DIFFERENTIATION OVER-RULES INTEGRATION AND SINCE THE INTEGRATING AGENCY IS THE COMMON INCLUSION IN THE WAVE-FIELD WHICH IS THE PRIMARY REALITY, DIFFERENTIATION “DROPS OUT” THE PRIMARY REALITY OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD and effectively RE-SITUATES THE DIFFERENTIATED ENTITIES WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which is the PRICE WE MUST PAY for this DIFFERENTIATION since DIFFERENTIATING makes use of a notional PERSISTING BEING of those FORMS being DIFFERENTIATED.

 

ONCE WE HAVE DONE THE DIFFERENTIATION and PRODUCED THE CATEGORIES OF THINGS, WE HAVE THE HUMPTY-DUMPTY PROBLEM OF BEING UNABLE TO PUT EVERYTHING BACK TOGETHER AGAIN BECAUSE WE ARE MISSING ESSENTIAL UNDERSTANDING THAT COMES WITH THE ONE-NESS OF THE WAVE-FIELD IN WHICH THE FORMS IN THE WAVE-FIELD ARE IN A ‘BOTH/AND’ RELATIONSHIP WITH THE WAVE-FIELD, MEANTING THAT THE FORMS ARE INSEPARABLE SINCE THE IDENTITY OF THE FLUID FORM IS TIED UP WITH THE IDENTITY OF THE FLUID MEDIUM AND THERE CAN BE NO ‘DIFFERENTIATING OUT’ A RELATIONAL FORMING-IN-THE-FLOWING WITHOUT A LOSS OF ESSENTIAL MEANING OF THAT RELATIONAL FORMING-IN-THE-FLOWING.   AND IF WE CREATE A REPRESENTATON BASED ON ALL OF THE DIFFERENTIABLE FORMS VIEWED AS A COLLECTION OF LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES (WHORLS THAT WE HAVE LIFTED OUT OF THE FLOW), THIS PRODCESS OF DIFFERENTIATING LEAVES US WITH A ‘HUMPTY-DUMPTY’ PROBLEM; I.E. WITH A COLLECTION OF SEPARATE THINGS, SUCH SEPARATENESS BEING THE EQUIVALENT OF THEIR BEING PUT ON DISPLAY WITHIN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE THAT DOES NOT INTERFERE WITH THEIR INDIVIDUAL THING-IN-ITSELF APPEARANCE BASED MEANING.

 

In Mathematics, we see this playing out in terms of the CONSTANT OF INTEGRATION which is an ADMISSION that when we try to RE-INTEGRATE that which we have DIFFERENTIATED, we are MISSING the relations between and among the DIFFERNTIATED PIECES, and the best we can do in mathematics is to MARK what is missing with the CONSTANT OF INTEGRATION which essentially makes the statement: There is something we removed in DIFFERENTIATION that we must put back in, in our process of  INTEGRATION but have lost the exotic and complex web of relations that we ‘took out’ in DIFFERENTIATING so the CONSTANT OF INTEGRATION is being used as a kind of MEMO TO FILE (here is the amorphous lump sum of the intricate relations we dropped out in our differentiating that signify what is requires to put HUMPTY DUMPTY back together again in the process of re-INTEGRATING what has been DIFFERENTIATED.

 

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE runs into this problem since it employs the TOOL of DIFFERENTIATION based FRAGMENTATION in its use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which essential uses language to FRAGMENT REALITY and recast PIECES of the sense-experience reality of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum, in terms of LOCAL FRAGMENTS and “THEIR” actions as presented using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR; e.g. note the consistent ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ABSTRACTION IN LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTS based on “DIFFERENTIATION” SUCH AS ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING AND PRODUCING goods’.

 

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, TAOIST/BUDDHIST AND ADVAITA VEDANTA LANGUAGE does not run into the problems associated with the TOOL of DIFFERENTIATION based FRAGMENTATON since there is no employment of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR , and the language employed corresponding ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING …’ is instead in FLOW-RETAINING FORM, .. ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.   In the latter INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL ETC language architecture THERE IS NO DIFFERENTIATION and this no problem with WHAT TO DO WITH THE CONSTANT OF INTEGRATION’, because in WESTERN CULTURE, the DIFFERENTIATED AND THUS FRAGMENTED RESULT IS EMPLOYED DIRECTLY AS THE OPERATING REALITY, a FRAGMENTING LANGUAGE based ‘OPERATING REALITY’ which is problematic.

 

NOTA BENE:  This following warning on FRAGMENTATION coming form our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is a CURRENT AND PERSISTING source of SOCIAL-RELATIONAL DYSFUNCTION!

 

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

 

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

 

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc

 

 

What is being claimed by Bohm is not the same as what is being claimed by Korzybski.   Korzybski is claiming that ‘the WORD IS NOT THE THING’ which gives backhanded support to the EXISTENCE OF THINGS.   Bohm is saying that THINGS DO NOT EXIST since things are the ARTEFACT of LANGUAGE and as Nietzsche pointed out, we use LANGUAGE in the form of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to imply LOCAL AUTHORING and it is this DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING and GRAMMAR instantiated LOCAL AUTHORING that is the source of FRAGMENTATION within our LANGUAGE-based REPRESENTATIONS which we then store in our psyche in our construction of linguistically articulable intellectual abstraction based representations of an OPERATIVE REALITY.   Whereas Korzybski points out that ‘the WORD is not the THING’, Korzybski leaves untouched the concept of the existence of THINGS and he further develops the notion of the EXISTENCE OF THINGS by creating CATEGORIES of THINGS; i.e. . “THE CLASSES OF LIFE” i.e. ‘The PLANTS as the Chemistry-Binding CLASS OF LIFE, … the ANIMALS as the Space-Binding CLASS OF LIFE, … and HUMANITY as the Time-binding CLASS OF LIFE.

 

BY CONTRAST, MODERN PHYSICS, BOHM, AND NIETZSCHE, employ a DEEPER EXCAVATION by REMOVING ALSO, the concepts of THINGS which KORZYBSKI has retained, doing away with only the meaning coming from WORDS that we use to PASTE LABELS on things and suggesting a kind of END-RUN to bypass NAMES yet nevertheless get to the MEANING OF THINGS such as by way of CATEGORIES.  Bohm and Nietzsche, on the other hand TAKE A DEEPER CUT and discredit the VERY NOTION OF THINGS, going all the way ‘down’ to the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD in which there are CONDENSATIONS which never make it to the status of THINGS but remain in Siamese twin like relationship with the overall transforming relational continuum wherein FIGURE and GROUND are ONE (where the FIGURE is a CONDENSATION of the WAVE-FIELD GROUND).

 

Korzybski’s , “THE CLASSES OF LIFE” i.e. ‘The PLANTS as the Chemistry-Binding CLASS OF LIFE, … the ANIMALS as the Space-Binding CLASS OF LIFE, … and HUMANITY as the Time-binding CLASS OF LIFE.   builds on the notion of “CATEGORIES OF LIFE” which GROUNDS the category based defining of things on the basis of THEIR ACTIONS (Chemistry-binding, Space-binding and Time-binding), which is essentially a FALLING BACK on WHAT THINGS DO for an understanding of things, rather than accepting WORD-NAMES as a cover for MATERIAL THINGS.  This does not go so far as Bohm and Nietzsche who reject the abstract concept of ‘the THING’ as in ‘CLASSES OF LIFE’ e.g. ‘the PLANTS, the ANIMALS and HUMANITY’.

 

* * *

 

My goal here is not simply to criticize Korzybski but to bring forth to the surface that fact that we have TWO LEVELS OF PROBLEMS WITH OUR WESTERN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE;

 

PROBLEM LEVEL ONE: KORZYBSKI:   WE ARE CONFUSING THE WORD FOR THE ‘THING’.  “Say whatever you choose about the object, and whatever you might say is not it.” Or, in other words: “Whatever you might say the object ‘is,’ well, it is not.” 

 

PROBLEM LEVEL TWO: Nietzsche and Bohm: THERE ARE NO LOCAL, EXPLICIT OBJECTS, there are only CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD. As Bohm says, SPACE IS NOT EMPTY (it is not an empty container for MATERIAL BEING THINGS), it is FULL.  Nietzsche points out that the AUTHORING ACTIONS of MATERIAL BEINGS is abstraction deriving from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.

 

“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm

 

 

Our judgement has us conclude that every change must have an author”;–but this conclusion is already mythology: it separates that which effects from the effecting. If I say “lightning flashes,” I have posited the flash once as an activity and a second time as a subject, and thus added to the event a being that is not one with the event but is rather fixed, “is” and does not “become.”–To regard an event as an “effecting,” and this as being, that is the double error, or interpretation, of which we are guilty.” – Nietzsche, ‘Will to Power’, 531

 

 

Korzybski’s issue with WORDS aims to BREAK THE BOND BETWEEN MATERIAL THINGS and the WORDS we use to describe MATERIAL THINGS but KORZYBSKI does not THROW OUT the abstract concept of the EXISTENCE of LOCAL OBJECTS, in fact, he reaffirms the existence of objects but points to the INABILITY OF LANGUAGE to capture WHAT AN OBJECT IS and proposes CATEGORIES as a means of doing an ‘end run’ around the INEFFABLE character of OBJECTS.  This is like raising a red-flag in regard to the difficulty associated with LANGUAGE CAPTURE of OBJECTS, which nevertheless accepts the EXISTENCE OF OBJECTS but claims them to be INEFFABLE.  Korzybski then proceeds to approach language based identification of them by way of collecting them into THREE CLASSES OF LIFE which is LESS PARTICULAR while retaining the basic concept of BEING but BLURRING it akin to the MODERN PHYSICS avoidance of the WAVE-NATURE of physical experience reality through the use of PROBABILITY THEORY that allows us to MATHEMATICALLY have our choice of PARTICLE and WAVE THEORY, … a sidestepping of acceptance of WAVE-FIELD understanding that led SCHROEDINGER to disassociate himself with the probability based interpretation of MODERN PHYSICS WAVE-FIELD THEORY.

 

The understanding that MATTER is a CONDENSATION OF THE WAVE-FIELD offers us a LESS SIMPLE LOGIC (less simple than BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC OF THE EXCLUDED MEDIUM; i.e. QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM (where we can picture the flowing WAVE-FIELD with a CONGEALED LUMP IN IT, the LUMPS appearing to be in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE but where that SPACE is instead, as Bohm’s above remark points out, the WAVE-FIELD PLENUM.

 

SUMMARY: of SIMPLE EXPLANATION of Why Whorf’s Hypothesis is IMPORTANT and how KORZYBSKI didn’t dig deep enough

 

Korzybski’s ‘THE WORD IS NOT THE THING’ is headed in the right direction but does not go as far as Bohm and Nietzsche, because KORZYBSKI retained the foundational role of ‘the THING’ or more specifically the LIVING THING as in his ‘THREE CLASSES OF LIFE’ (LIVING THINGS) which departs from Schroedinger’s ‘WHAT is LIFE’ which aligns with Bohm and Nietzsche’s understanding of ourselves as being inclusions within the transforming relational continuum.

 

“ … the insight is not new. The earliest records to my knowledge date back some 2,500 years or more. From the early great Upanishads the recognition ATHMAN = BRAHMAN (the personal self equals the omnipresent, all-comprehending eternal self) was in Indian thought considered, far from being blasphemous, to represent the quintessence of deepest insight into the happenings of the world. The striving of all the scholars of Vedanta was, after having learnt to pronounce with their lips, really to assimilate in their minds this grandest of all thoughts.

 

Again, the mystics of many centuries, independently, yet in perfect harmony with each other (somewhat like the particles in an ideal gas) have described, each of them, the unique experience of his or her life in terms that can be condensed in the phrase: DEUS FACTUS SUM (I have become God).

 

To Western ideology the thought has remained a stranger.

– Erwin Schroedinger, ‘What is LIfe’, ‘Epilogue: On Determinism and Free Will’

 

Whorf’s Hypothesis is that the particular language we use can shape one’s conception of reality so that the speakers of differing languages may have different understandings of reality.;

 

The hypothesis of linguistic relativity, also known as the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis is a principle suggesting that the structure of a language affects its speakers’ worldview or cognition, and thus people’s perceptions are relative to their spoken language. 

 

A particular example is indigenous aboriginal peoples whose language is relational (e.g. There is TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE) and WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS who use one of the COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN languages such as English based on OBJECTS notionally with their own GRAMMAR given POWERS OF AUTHORING actions and developments (e.g. the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products).   The latter infusing of LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS being a BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION characteristic of the behaviours of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE USERS in their differentiating of people into AUTHORS OF GOOD ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS and AUTHORS OF BAD ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, an abstract DIVISION which leads to PURIFICATIONISM as a SOCIAL ETHIC aimed at promoting the GROWTH of AUTHORING OF GOOD actions and developments and SHRINKING of AUTHORING of BAD actions and developments.

 

This OVER-SIMPLISTIC SOCIAL ETHIC is like the CUCKOO’S EGG that fills the slot intended for something LESS SIMPLE and hijacks the provisioning of nurturance associated with that slot with the LANGUAGE SYSTEM.  For example there is inbuilt support in language for the BINARY LOGIC based representations such as the TOWN is GROWING that MAKE IT WORK even though it has a ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING STRUCTURE  which is simpler than the QUANTUM LOGIC ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which has an ANDROGYNOUS (WAVE-FIELD CONSISTENT) STRUCTURE.

 

PSYCHOLOGICALLY, there is a major difference between whether one thinks of a TOWN or HUMAN as an INDEPENDENT MATERIAL AGENT WITH ITS OWN POWERS of AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, VERSUS   thinking of a TOWNING or HUMANING as A RELATIONAL FORM IN THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM as in Modern physics.  Such understanding of the LANGUAGE BASED DIFFERENCE explains many of the culture induced behavioural differences between INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS (along with Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanat adherents) versus WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS.

 

* * *

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As NATURAL ANIMALS, we are AWARE of the QUANTUM LOGIC nature of NATURE because we are RELATIONAL FORMS in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

 

Now, THAT is not just ‘me’ talking, that is the understanding that our physical and philosophical investigations have led us to, and what it does is to REAFFIRM our Modern physics understanding in terms of our inclusion in an ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD dynamic, which is where the QUANTUM LOGIC comes and where the BINRY LOGIC drops out since the latter is TOO SIMPLE while the former is LESS SIMPLE.

 

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have generated a PROBLEM that we are now disseminating with our STANDARD AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE REPRESENTATIONS of REALITY, in that we have given BINARY LOGIC based MATERIAL DYNAMICS the foundational role rather than QUANTUM LOGIC based RELATIONAL DYNAMICS.

 

QUANTUM LOGIC “BOTH/AND” LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM and the INCLUDING MEDIUM is the WAVE-FIELD which INCLUDES “CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVEE-FIELD” so that the MATERIAL FORMS we see that APPEAR to be INDEPENDENT are “NOT INDEPENDENT” because they are CONDENSATIONS of all-including WAVE-FIELD.

 

NOTA BENE:  This QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD universe is what our LANGUAGE should be capturing and that is WHAT IT IS CAPTURING in the indigenous aboriginal languages, BUT IT IS NOT WHAT OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE IS CAPTURING.  Our WESTERN CULTURE  LANGUAGE is REDUCING the QUANTUM LOGIC relational forms in the WAVE-FIELD (which are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT in the manner of clouding in the atmosphere) to BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION.  This is like USING LANGUAGE TO REDUCE a HOLOGRAM of a MATERIAL FORM TO THE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPT of a SOLID MATERIAL OBJECT IN EMPTY SPACE which is can be done by using NAMING to impute INDEPENDENT BEING to the SOLID MATERIAL OBJECT IN EMPTY SPACE and by using GRAMMAR to impute the POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments to the BEING.

 

This LANGUAGE-based DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, as Nietzsche calls it, IS THE FOUNDATIONAL BASIS of our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and it SPLITS APART THE ALL-INCLUDING  QUANTUM LOGIC REPRESENTATION of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT MATERIAL FORMS that are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-PERVADING WAVE-FIELD, and RE-PRESENTS THEM in the BINARY LOGIC terms of LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES notionally ENDOWED WITH POWERS OF LOCAL SOURCING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS which is a MECHANICALIZATION of reality, giving the PRIMARY AUTHORING ROLE to the FRAGMENTED SEPARATE PIECES CREATED BY NAMING and ANIMATED WITH GRAMMAR.

 

So, this is the story in regard to Why Whorf’s Hypothesis is IMPORTANT (i.e. How Uncloaking QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY IS IMPORTANT.)

 

The hypothesis of linguistic relativity, also known as the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis is a principle suggesting that the structure of a language affects its speakers’ worldview or cognition, and thus people’s perceptions are relative to their spoken language. 

 

ACHTUNG:  INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES DO NOT FRAGMENT WHILE WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES “DO FRAGMENT” e.g. we go from TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE of QUANTUM LOGIC to the MANY INDEPENDENT TOWNS IN THE ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE OF BINARY LOGIC.

 

These DIFFERENT languages put VERY DIFFERENT PERCEPTIONS OF REALITY into the MINDS OF THE RESPECTIVE USERS OF THESE DIFFERENT LANGUAGES, for example ‘TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE is NOT FRAGMENTATIVE while SEVERAL TOWN HAVE ‘SPRUNG UP’ in the VALLEY and THEY ARE ALL GROWING IN SIZE AND POPULATION

 

Now, HOW CAN WE SAY SUCH A THING without mentioning the CONJUGATE SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS?   Because by NOT MENTIONING the CONJGUATE SHRINKING of the WILDERNESS, we are giving the impression that the TOWNS are capable of GROWTH IN THEIR OWN RIGHT as if they are INDEPENDENT BEING BASED THINGS whose GROWTH IS COMING FROM THEM, “THE TOWNS” as if TOWN “ARE” LOCAL EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES rather than GATHERING-SCATTERING “CLUSTERINGS” which must be understood as INCLUSIONS in the broader ‘TRANSFORMING REALITY CONTINUUM’, … and “NOT” in the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR context as LOCAL ENTITIES with “THEIR OWN LOCAL PRODUCTS AND DEVELOPMENTS”.’

 

This LINGUISTIC DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR is the source of an abstract and overly SIMPLE LANGUAGE-BASED FRAGMENTATION which is DRIVING US WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS NUTS!

 

Our SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMED REALITY is constituted by LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC relations and is AND DOES NOT INVOLVE SIMPLE FRAGMENTATION, but does involve BALANCE as the “DISTINGUISHING ATTRIBUTE”.

 

In A FLUID SYSYTEM where MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING FLOW (WAVE-FIELD), there is no actual SPLITTING or FRAGMENTING, there is only TRANSFORMATION wherein the CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD NEVER ACTUALLY BECOME INDEPENDENT OF THE WAVE-FIELD but remain features WITHIN the WAVE-FIELD in a QUANTUM LOGIC rather than BINARY LOGIC relation.

 

If we stay with the WAVE-FIELD understanding of reality, we never DESCEND to a MATERIAL THING based representation of reality.  For example, WESTERN COMMON SCIENCE (Newtonian), by being a language-based representation based on notional MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES lead to questions and interpretations GROUNDED IN THAT TOO-SIMPLE CONTEXT of MATERIAL THINGS and THEIR DYNAMICS, and here we entering into one of those LANGUAGE-DEPENDENT WHORFIAN WORLDS where, in this case, we talk in the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR terms where we ask ourselves FRAGMENTATION based questions such as; ‘CAN AN OBJECT BE SUCKED INTO SPACE FROM THE EARTH’S ATMOSPHERE’ (as where an aircraft with pressurized cabin gets a break in its fuselage by some accident or explosion).  The answer GIVEN is “NO” and the explanation is that “there is no such thing as FEMALE ACCOMMODATING aka SUCKING” yet there seems to be NO PROBLEM on the part of MAINSTREAM SCIENCE in ASSERTING that the air is capable of PUSHING.  The following is an excerpt from a ‘popular science’ article’s discrediting of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING  action termed SUCKING, as in the case where we say someone got ‘sucked out’ of a jetliner which had developed a hole in its fuselage’.

 

https://www.forbes.com/sites/quora/2016/11/21/theres-no-suction-in-space-because-suction-is-an-illusion/?sh=4f69fc3d7236

 

“There is no such attractive force as “suction”.  There is, however, air in the plane.  Pressurized to the equivalent pressure of 8 or 9 thousand feet, the air is pressing out on the skin of the aircraft with a force of about 10 pounds per square inch.  When a hole opens in that skin, there is suddenly nothing pushing back. The air rushes out, but it is not pulled by the near vacuum outside, it is pushed by the air behind it.  The air is also pushing in all around you at 10 psi.

If, right before the breach, you had released your buckle and strolled forward to tell a flight attendant about the kid who barfed in the toilet, you’d have found yourself in a pickle.  When the hole opened up, the air between you and the tail, however, would still be pressing on you at 10 psi.  If you have a cross section of around 1,500 square inches, all that air is going to shove you toward the hole with a total force of 15,000 pounds.  Nice knowing you.

 

Here, once again, the example surfaces where we allow the concept of MALE ASSERTING PRESSURE as PUSHING THINGS AROUND without acknowledging any FEMALE ACCOMMODATING INDUCTIVE ROLE.  This is SO COMMON TO US WESTERN CULTURE COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE USERS that we have become BLIND to the LANGUAGE issues here, such as the issue where we have THROWN OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD conjugate and tacitly built in the one-sided expression in MALE-ASSERTING TERMS, THE CHARACTERISTIC STRUCTURE OF COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION.

 

English is one of those language that is used in such a fashion as to IGNORE the FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and to orient ONE-SIDEDLY to MALE ASSERTING REPRESENTATIONS as in the PRESSURE concept.

 

This BANNING of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING concepts like SUCKING is characteristic of languages such as English is found in examples such as ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ where we can say that the MALE ASSERTING PUNCH is the AUTHOR of the FRACTURED SKULL even if the reality is that the SKULL was an EGG-SHELL SKULL whose ACCOMMODATING action surpassed the MALE ASSERTING ACTION that is given all the AUTHORING CREDIT.  In the case of the LONG HOT SUMMER and the TINDER-DRY “RAIN” FOREST, the careless discarding of a cigarette butt, THE MALE-ASSERTING OF WHICH IN ITSELF WOULD IN ITSELF HAVE NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE  SOPPING WET RAINFOREST, is FALSELY CREDITED with AUTHORING the FOREST FIRE, when the FOREST is in a HIGHLY FEMALE ACCOMMODATING (TINDER DRY) CONDITION.

 

THIS IS A PHYSICAL REALITY; i.e. a WAVE-FIELD REALITY wherein the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and MALE ASSERTING are a CONJUGATE UNITY THAT CAN BE SPOKEN OF TOGETHER IN THE QUANTUM LOGIC TERMS OF ‘BALANCE’ AND ‘IMBALANCE’ WITHOUT HAVING TO FRAGMENT THE REPRESENTATION BINARY MALE-ASSERTING AND FEMALE ACCOMMODATING TERMS.  THE BALANCE AND IMBALANCE NONDUALITY is the NATURAL WAVE-FIELD MODE OF INFLUENCE, and the use of these BALANCE based terms in place of the FEMALE and MALE BIPOLAR TERMS makes a difference to our understanding of natural phenomena;

 

The hypothesis of linguistic relativity, also known as the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis is a principle suggesting that the structure of a language affects its speakers’ worldview or cognition, and thus people’s perceptions are relative to their spoken language. 

 

The AVOIDANCE of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING in the THIN SKULL RULE sets up MALE ASSERTING as the PRIMARY REALITY and this artificial LANGUAGE-based IMPUTING OF LOCAL AUTHORING is CHRONIC in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATION.

 

ACHTUNG!  NOTA BENE!  THE FOLLOWING IS TRICKY BUT HIGHLY RELEVANT TO RESOLVING LANGUAGE-ROOTED CONFUSION THAT IS RAMPANT IN WESTERN CULTURE.

 

First, we may ask ourselves, WHY is it our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE HABIT to be OK with LANGUAGE evoking the one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT but NOT OK with LANGUAGE evoking the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING ACTION and DEVELOPMENT.   For example, why does WESTERN JUSTICE have the THIN SKULL RULE where it is legitimate to say that the MALE ASSERTING PUNCH SHATTERED THE MAN’S SKULL without mentioning that the man’s SKULL was EGGSHELL THIN so that the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING OR ‘GIVING IN’ WAS THE PRIMARY DYNAMIC and the MALE ASSERTING was merely a TRIGGER and not THE AUTHOR of the ACTION and DEVELOPMENT.

 

WHAT IS GOING ON HERE is that while our sense-experience reality is of INCLUSION IN THE ANDROGYNYOUS WAVE-FIELD, our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is based, ONE-SIDEDLY, on the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is how we construct an impression of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.

 

LOCAL AUTHORING IS NOT SUPPORTED BY MODERN PHYSICS NOR IS IT SUPPORTED BY INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES NOR BY BOHM’S RHEOMODE MODERN PHYSICS COMPLIANT FLOW-based LANGUAGE.

 

WE LIVE WITHIN A TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM AKA THE WAVE-FIELD WHERE THERE IS NO “LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS”, there is only ANDROGYNOUS TRANSFORMATION.

 

ACHTUNG!  NOTA BENE!  WE HAVE A PROBLEM WHEN WE ARE USING LANGUAGE THAT IS “DUMBED DOWN” TO REPRESENTATION IN ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING TERMS such as THE ASSAILANT SMASHED THE MAN’S SKULL WITH HIS FIRST PUNCH.   THERE IS NOT A WHISPER OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE HERE BUT “WE ALL KNOW THAT THE “DAMAGE” IN SUCH CASES IS ALWAYS AN ANDROGYNOUS COMBINATION OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING OF THE RECIPIENT AND THE MALE ASSERTING ACTION which means that it is INCORRECT to attribute FULL AND SOLE AUTHORSHIP OF THE DEVELOPMENT (e.g. the SHATTERING OF THE SKULL) to the MALE ASSERTING AGENT.  To do this is to imply that LANGUAGE that REDUCES the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC to the SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY based on one-sided MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT delivers and acceptable LANGUAGE-based RENDERING of our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY and is not simply PIE-IN-THE-SKY ABSTRACTION, which in this case of ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS is the ACTUAL CASE.

 

CONSTRUCTION, GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION are all ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTIONS which Nietzsche points our come from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR; e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, … which DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING which is naturally part of the actual sense-experience affirmable dynamic and which “IS” captured in the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL ANDROGYNOUS LANGUAGE REPRESENTATION which is in terms of “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”

 

ALSO, ‘PRESSURE’, although it is a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT concept, is something we commonly treat of in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, as having a MALE ASSERTING GESTALT, as if IT IS ACTING ON SOME THING like a HUMAN THING and ENCLOSING IT AND SQUEEZING IT, as we can imagine OURSELVES being SQUEEZED like the story of the DEEP SEA DIVER at a great depth who is wearing a pressurized suit, that when it sprouts a leak, allows the extremely high deep sea pressure to invade the diving suit so that the diver’s entire body ends up a bloody pulpy mass pushed up into the last low pressure refuge of his metal helmet.

 

WE ARE MAKING  A MISTAKE TO THINK OF ‘PRESSURE’ IN A MALE ASSERTING LIGHT. PRESSURE CAN BE UNDERSTOOD AS ENERGY PER UNIT VOLUME AKA ENERGY DENSITY.  COMPARE

 

“There is no such attractive force as “suction”.  There is, however, air in the plane.  Pressurized to the equivalent pressure of 8 or 9 thousand feet, the air is pressing out on the skin of the aircraft with a force of about 10 pounds per square inch.  When a hole opens in that skin, there is suddenly nothing pushing back. The air rushes out, but it is not pulled by the near vacuum outside, it is pushed by the air behind it.  The air is also pushing in all around you at 10 psi.  [WARNING!  BINARY LOGIC OVER-SIMPLIFICATION DETECTED!]

 

If, right before the breach, you had released your buckle and strolled forward to tell a flight attendant about the kid who barfed in the toilet, you’d have found yourself in a pickle.  When the hole opened up, the air between you and the (airplane) tail, however, would still be pressing on you at 10 psi.  If you have a cross section of around 1,500 square inches, all that air is going to shove you toward the hole with a total force of 15,000 pounds.  Nice knowing you.

 

 

 

https://www.nature.com/articles/nphys4338

 

Pressure is the amount of force per unit area, and hence the pascal (Pa) — the SI unit of pressure — is 1 newton per square meter (N m−2). But pressure can also be expressed as the amount of energy per unit volume (J m−3), because the SI unit of energy, the joule (J), is defined as 1 newton meter.

 

The equivalence of pressure p and energy density provides an alternative measurement method. For an ideal gas, the relation p = (N/V)kBT holds (the ideal-gas law), where N is the number of particles occupying volume V, kB is the Boltzmann constant and T is the temperature. The number density N/V of a gas can be obtained via gas refractivity; the equation for pressure then becomes p ∝ (n − 1)kBT, where n is the refractive index of the gas.

 

Researchers realized that first-principles calculations of the refractive index of helium could be a new route to realizing the pascal. The NIST team worked with the University of Delaware to determine a high-quality theoretical value based on quantum-chemical calculations1. This way, any measurement of the refractive index of helium can be a primary measurement of pressure and the pascal need no longer be defined by a mercury manometer.

 

 

CONSIDER THAT “PRESSURE CAN BE EXPRESSED AS THE AMOUNT OF ENERGY PER UNIT VOLUME.”   This is NOT the same understanding as in the MALE ASSERTING UNDERSTANDING of PRESSURE, as in SHE PUT PRESSURE ON ME TO CONSTRUCT a HOUSE on the HILL.   In this case, ‘PRESSURE’ is a FORCE THAT LAUNCHES MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS of one type or another.

 

* * *

 

PRESSURE in the physical definition sense seem to be a property of the space we share inclusion in, in which case is something that can be used to force someone to move or act in a given manner, as

 

The air is also pushing in all around you at 10 psi.   THIS IS BINARY LOGIC BASED INTERPRETATION of PRESSURE.

 

After FIRST ESTABLISHING the LOCAL BEING BASED PRESENCE of “YOU”, we can speak of The air … pushing in all around you at 10 psi, … implying that THE AIR and YOU are TWO MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE MATERIAL THINGS IN THEMSELVES and the PUSHING AIR is a MALE ASSERTING AIR THING-IN-ITSELF WITH LOCAL POWERS OF ‘PUSHING’ (as in the DOUBLE ERROR construction which establishes the abstraction of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development).

 

In reality, there is only the all-including transforming relational continuum aka THE WAVE-FIELD in which what we are calling ‘air’ and ‘you’ are defined as being MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE BINARY LOGIC based BEING THINGS, as in FEMALE CONTAINER (air) and MALE CONTENT (you).

 

WHAT I AM SUGGESTING BY THIS ‘LINE OF DISCUSSION” is that “PRESSURE” is another word/concept that we are abusing in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATIONS, along with CONSTRUCTION, GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION because all of these terms are used to promote the notion of MALE ASSERTING meaning so that they are undermining, in LANGUAGE, the understanding of dynamics in the ANDROGYNOUS terms of WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION.  

 

* * *

 

OK, I KNOW THIS IS SUBTLE, BUT IT IS IMPORTANT FOR US TO WORK THROUGH IT BECAUSE IT IMPACTS OUR LANGUAGE-STIMULATED UNDERSTANDING OF “REALITY”

 

What I am getting at is this.  We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using LANGUAGE to GET RID OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE OF THE WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC, LEAVING ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE TO ‘MAKE REALITY SENSE WITH’.   MAKING SENSE OUT OF THE DYNAMICS OF THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE ON ITS OWN IS NOT POSSIBLE, … UNLESS, ONE CONSIDERS THE SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS THAT CAN BE CONSTRUCTED WITH THE ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE AS ‘SENSE-MAKING’; e.g. WE CAN CONSIDER THE LOGICAL PROPOSITION THAT ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING’ AS A SENSIBLE PROPOSITION WITHIN A SUBSTITUTE REALITY WHERE ‘GROWTH’ is MEANINGFUL, but THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS GROWTH IN A TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM WHERE ‘ALL MY RELATIONS’ is what is MEANINGFUL IS THE COINCIDENTIA OPPOSITORUM OF FEMALE ACCOMMODATION AS IN ‘SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS’ IN CONJUGATE RELATION WITH ‘GROWTH OF CONSTRUCTION, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION’, …. and when we put the SHRINKING OF NATURAL RESOURCES TOGETHER WITH THE GROWTH OF CONSTRUCTION, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, we get “TRANSFORMATION” which is what is actually going on, according to our sense-experience OF INCLUSION IN THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMATION.

 

SO, TO SPEAK OUTSIDE OF THE CONTEXT OF TRANSFORMATION, … OF THE GROWTH OF CONSTRUCTION, DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION; i.e. as if they were SOMETHING MALE-ASSERTING AND REAL, amounts to the use of LANGUAGE to “CREATE” a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY, an ABSTRACT PSEUDO-WORLD which is easily and freely constructed with this ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING LANGUAGE ABSTRACTION, that IS NOT SENSE-EXPERIENCE AFFIRMABLE.

 

On the other hand, the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE based REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY do not employ all this one-sided MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT, but are representations based on FLOW-BASED LANGUAGES which speak in terms an all-including transforming relational continuum, the GREAT HARMONY or etc. where QUANTUM LOGIC RULES, as where MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD or GREAT HARMONY.

 

* * *

 

SUMMARY:  OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED WORLD VIEW PUTS US INTO A SUBSTITUTE REALITY WHICH IS MALE-ASSERTING BASED AND IS MISSING THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.  THIS LANGUAGE-BASED ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING SUBSTITUTE REALITY GIVES US THE IMPRESSION THAT THE WORLD DERIVES FROM LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS AS SUPPORTED BY THE ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR.   BECAUSE THIS LOCAL AUTHORING IS ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING BASED, THERE IS NO NEED (WITHIN THE LANGUAGE-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS) TO MAKE MENTION OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE DYNAMICS WHICH ARE “PRIMARY” IN OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY AND THIS OMISSION IS ‘COVERED UP’ BY THE INSERTING OF A NOTIONAL ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OR INFINITE EXTENT, IN PLACE OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

 

THIS IS THE REASON FOR THE ‘THIN SKULL RULE’ AND ASSOCIATED ‘DROP OUTS’, IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION SCHEME, OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.  EVERYWHERE WE LOOK IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE DISCOURSE, WE ARE DOING AS WE DO WITH THE THIN SKULL RULE, TO SIMPLY “DROP OUT” (AS IN OBSCURANTISM) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE SO THAT THE MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT (THE PUNCH AND FRACTURED SKULL IN THE CASE OF THE THIN SKULL EVENT) IS CONSIDERED TO BE THE FULL AND SOLE “AUTHOR” OF THE ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT, AS IF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE “DID NOT EXIST”.  BUT THE REALITY IS, AS IS CAPTURED IN MODERN PHYSICS AND INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES, THAT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD IS THE FULL-BLOWN ‘PLENUM’ IN WHICH VISIBLE, TANGIBLE MATERIAL FORMS AND THEIR DYNAMICS ARE ‘SECONDARY APPEARANCES’ OR ‘SCHAUMKOMMEN’ (SCHROEDINGER).

 

IN ORDER TO HAVE LANGUAGE THAT CAPTURES THE FULL WAVE-FIELD REALITY, WE MUST HAVE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE THAT SUPPORTS FLOW AS PREVAILS IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM AND AS IN THE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTS OF THE TYPE ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ WHICH CONVEYS THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONTAINER TOGETHER IN CONJUGATE RELATION WITH THE MALE ASSERTING CONTENT. THIS IS THE FULL QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE AND IT HAS NOT, AS IN WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, BEEN “STRIPPED DOWN” TO ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY (BINARY LOGIC) REPRESENTATIONS, AS IN THE ‘LOCAL AND EXPLICIT MALE-ASSERTING ‘DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR’ CONSTRUCTIONS, BY THE ‘DROPPING OUT’ OF THE PRIMARY REALITY WHICH ‘GOES MISSING’ WITH THE DROP OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE AND THE SUBSTITUTING OF AN ABSTRACT ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

 

Our WESTERN CULTURE continuing support for this ABSTRACT ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTION is ‘SECURED’ and PERSISTS thanks to the customs and traditions BASED ON ITS ONE-SIDED LOCAL AUTHORING BELIEF such as REWARDING and RECOGNIZING individuals and groups on the basis of the perceived (NAMING-INSTANTIATED) INDEPENDENT BEINGS and their (GRAMMAR-INSTANTIATED) LOCAL AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS, of the TWO BINARY LOGIC OPPOSED TYPES (GOOD WORKS AND BAD WORKS) which are seen as meriting, respectively, REWARDS and PUNISHMENTS.

 

In Modern physics, and as also in the INDIGENOUS BORIGINAL CULTURE, there is an awareness of the FLOW-BASED nature of NATURE wherein GOOD and BAD which are BEING-based states, are understood, in stead, in the relational terms of RESONANCE and DISSONANCE such that the challenge of overcoming RELATIONAL DISSONANCE is by way of cultivating and restoring RELATIONAL RESONANCE.   This is UNLIKE the WESTERN CULTURE INTERPRETATION and RESPONSE, the INTERPRETATION OF THE ‘LOCAL AUTHORING of EVIL ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS which is seen to merit the ELIMINATION or DISABLING/INCARCERATION of the “AUTHORS” of EVIL ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.  This PURIFICATIONIST  APPROACH is UNLIKE the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL and Modern physics understanding which is in terms of RELATIONAL TRANSFORMATION and the move to subsume relational DISSONANCE with relational HARMONY without the WESTERN CULTURE WITCHHUNTS for LOCAL AUTHORS that can be BLAMED for the emergence of EVIL ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.   In reality, THERE ARE NO SUCH ‘AUTHORS’ of GOOD or EVIL WORKS.  Instead there are CONDUITS or LIGHTNING RODS through whom RELATIONAL TENSIONS in the social collective are DISCHARGED, … the CONDUIT for this RELATIONAL TENSIONAL DISCHARGE … NOT BEING SEEN AS THE “LOCAL, JUMPSTART” “AUTHOR” of the MURDER, RAPE or ROBBERY, but as the conduits for tensions arising in the social collective.

 

In the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL SOCIAL TENSION, it is UNDERSTOOD that the individual who appears to be the AUTHOR of an IMPRESSIVELY GOOD OR BAD EVENT can only EVER be a conduit instead of an AUTHOR because the AUTHOR status derives from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, … WHILE, BY CONTRAST, the CHANNELLING of DISSONANT and/or RESONANT actions is understood as developments which are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) in their origin.

 

These TWO WORLDS born of TWO LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES, the resonance-cultivating QUANTUM LOGIC world of NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT relational resonance of the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURES, versus the PURIFICATIONIST BINARY LOGIC world of LOCAL and EXPLICIT EITHER/OR JUDGEMENTS OF GOOD OR BAD, that DIVIDE the global social collective and may divide the individual psyche land/or group psyche as Bohm points out, are deserving of Kipling’s EAST/WEST BINARY dividing poem .

 

 

The Ballad of East and West by Rudyard Kipling; Oh, East is East, and West is West, and never the two shall meet, ; Till Earth and Sky stand presently at God’s great Judgment Seat;.

 

 

Of course, the resolving of BINARY LOGIC relational polarizing contention cannot be resolved at that same low level of BINARY LOGIC, there must be a HIGHER LEVEL of LOGIC and QUANTUM LOGIC IS THAT HIGHER LEVEL where EARTH and SKY are no longer TWO but ONE, the ONENESS wherein EARTH is understood as a CONDENSATION of the SKY.

 

* * *

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How Whorf’s Hypothesis Uncloaks Quantum Logic Reality

OCTOBER 25, 2022

I do not choose titles to scare off readers but to get something that describes the written topic that fits across the top of the page, … now that that’s done this title can be explained using SIMPLER and more FAMIILAR words that meanwhile must to put together in a greater number in order to share (in simple word) what the topic is.  There is a message here, and that message is that our STANDARD AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE is TOO SIMPLE for sharing the QUANTUM LOGIC subject matte that is needed to share Whorf’s Hypothesis, … and I mean here a REAL UNDERSTANDIN of WHORF’S HYPOTHESIS which the casual reader is NOT GETTING.

 

My meaning is this; … we live in a QUANTUM LOGIC reality but we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS use a BINARY LOGIC based language that DUMPS DOWN the QUANTUM LOGIC as in the following example;

 

QUANTUM LOGIC EXPRESSION:  There is HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  COMMENT:  this quantum logic based linguistic representation preserves the FLUID (WAVE-FIELD) nature of reality.

BINARY LOGIC EXPRESSION:  The HUMAN is CONSTRUCTING, GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING things:  this binary logic based linguistic representation synthesizes a material object based reality.

 

In the QUANTUM LOGIC EXPRESSION, … THERE IS HUMANING IN THE TRANFORMING WAVE-FIELD, the BOTH/AND relation of QUANTUM LOGIC is made manifest; e.g. as with ENERGY-BASED FORMS in a WAVE-FIELD, these forms inseparably included in the energy-field (the energy fill WAVE-FIELD) which means that EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) because ‘things’ are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD aka energy-loaded PLENUM.   One must therefore ‘get used to’ understanding HUMANINGS or TOWNINGS or any of the many types of FORMINGS, in terms of fluid forms within the all-including WAVE-FIELD.  In this case EVERYTHING IS RELATED and there is NOTHING that is either LOCAL or EXPLICIT and NOTHING therefore to be the base of any sort of “LOCAL AUTHORING”.   And recall that we are talking about REALITY here so Modern physics is saying that REALITY “IS” THIS TRANSFORMING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM which is INVISIBLE and ALL-PERVADING, so “SPACE” is ‘FIELD’ and it is “NO EMPTY VOID” locally populated by MATERIAL OBJECTS.  And when we accept that SPACE IS FIELD, what we were tossing out as worthless emptiness now becomes THE PRIMARY STUFF OF REALITY, THE FIELD, wherein the CONDENSATIONS of the FIELD are what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have been calling INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BODIES and making THEM out to be THE PRIMARY STUFF OF REALITY.

This has led to a MAJOR MIXUP as to WHAT IS THE PRIMARY AUTHOR OF REALITY because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have assumed it is the CONDENSATIONS (the purportedly “INDEPENDENT” MATERIAL OBJECTS) while Indigenous aboriginals and Modern physics have shown that PRIMARY AUTHOR OF REALITY is the WAVE-FIELD and “NOT” the CONDENSATIONS OF THE WAVE-FIELD.

Unfortunately, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have BUILT INTO OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE A CONFUSING ‘DOUBLE ERROR”; i.e. THE BINARY LOGIC BASED ASSUMPTION THAT THE “PRESUMED-INDEPENDENT MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS (THE FIRST ERROR OF NAMING-INSTANTIATED BEING) POSSESS (THE SECOND ERROR) GRAMMAR GIVEN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.  This was identified by Nietzsche as the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.

LOCAL AUTHORING INVOKED BY THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR IS THE BUS that is PUTTING OUR WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT SOCIAL COLLECTIVE ON A BUSTRIP TO HELL.

LOCAL AUTHORING INVOKED BY THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR IS “NOT” PART OF THE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.

The hypothesis of linguistic relativity, also known as the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis is a principle suggesting that the structure of a language affects its speakers’ worldview or cognition, and thus people’s perceptions are relative to their spoken language. 

 

WESTERN CULTURE PEOPLE’S PERCEPTIONS, COMING FROM BINARY LOGIC INFUSED LANGUAGE, ARE THAT AUTHORING IS LOCAL and EXPLICIT;  (THE TOWN/HUMAN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING, PRODUCING’

INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL PEOPLE’S PERCEPTIONS, COMING FROM QUANTUM LOGIC INFUSED LANGUAGE, ARE THAT AUTHORING IS NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT (relational)’ THERE IS TOWNING/HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

These very different LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE INFLUENCED PERCEPTIONS, lead to very different worldviews which lead to very different social relational support systems such as MEDICINE, JUSTICE and GOVERNANCE.

As we know, the BINARY LOGIC VIEWS of WESTERN CULTURE leads to ANTI-PATHOGEN strategies in MEDICINE, JUSTICE and GOVERNANCE while the QUANTUM LOGIC (BALANCE-orienting) VIEWS of INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURES leads to the CULTIVATING OF RELATIONAL RESONANCE in these fields which implies at the same time, the ATTENUATING of RELATIONAL DISSONANC.  Note the INDIGENOUS ABORIGNAL relational approach orients to the overall web-of-relations where the dynamics are understood as NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT rather than LOCAL and EXPLICIT so there is encouraging of relational resonance and the discouraging of relational dissonance, and where people are killed in battle, it is not the result of a BINARY LOGIC PURIFICATIONIST ETHIC, but the result of a QUANTUM LOGIC BALANCING ETHIC.

* * *

a language affects its speakers’ worldview or cognition, and thus people’s perceptions are relative to their spoken language. 

 

The WESTERN CULTURE and INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES are a case in point, where we can see how the WESTERN CULTURE language architecture orients to BINARY LOGIC based PURIFICATION while the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES orient to QUANTUM LOGIC based BALANCE.

* * *

 

Thus, we can see How Whorf’s Hypothesis Uncloaks Quantum Logic Reality

 

* * *