PREFACE: The ARCHITECTURE of LANGUAGE has been shaped by THREE different ways of CONCEIVING of REALITY which range from SIMPLE through LESS SIMPLE to LEAST SIMPLE which could be called ‘DIFFERENTIATION, INTEGRATION and TRANSFORMATION.  EXAMPLES;

DIFFERENTIATION: ‘the HURRICANE is (male, assertively) STIRRING UP the ATMOSPHERE’,

INTEGRATION: ‘The ATMOSPHERE is (female, inductively) STIRRING UP the HURRICANE’ and,

TRANSFORMATION: ‘SOLAR IRRADIANCE is INDUCING HURRICANING IN THE ATMOSPHERING’.

These three REALITY options have made their way into LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which in turn has spawned division into CULTURAL VARIANTS.  The simplest options of DIFFERENTIATION and INTEGRATION support mindsets with POLAR OPPOSITE views we term CONSERVATISM and LIBERALISM.  The Conservative belief is that the world works by way of independent things that ‘assertively stir things up’ in a male-asserting forceful manner.  The Liberal belief is that the world works by way of independent things ‘inductively stirring things up’ in a female-inductive seductive manner.  While we can well picture the POLARIZING FRAGMENTATION of a social collective on the basis of the Conservative – Liberal SPLIT in understanding reality, this leaves out the people of the indigenous aboriginal culture, who encounter STRIFE in a less simple (than binary logic) manner; i.e. in a QUANTUM ‘BOTH/AND’ LOGIC of the INCLUDING medium manner.  In a weather metaphor, we can see all THREE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE REALITY PORTRAYING SCHEMES in relational context.

The DIFFERENTIATION scheme corresponds to the HURRICANE which is like a WILD MALE, BREAKING things up into pieces and scattering the pieces.  The INTEGRATION scheme is like the ATMOSPHERE which is a SEDUCTIVE FEMALE who is gathering up and integrating the pieces so the ATMOSPHERE is FEMALE INDUCTIVE and SUCKS or PULLS while the HURRICANE is MALE ASSERTING and BLOWS or PUSHES and these mental models are used as organizing ‘go-bys’ for social collectives, and BOTH seem to have their ‘relative merits’ which sets up interminable polarizing arguments since ‘Conservatives put PUSHING or ENFORCING in first priority while Liberals put PULLING or ENCOURAGING in first priority.   The THIRD and LEAST SIMPLE OPTION takes things to a HIGHER DIMENSION, the metaphor for which is SOLAR IRRADIANCE, the influence-giving LOGIC pervading the all-including energy-charged PLENUM which INCLUDES BOTH ATMOSPHERE GATHERING AND HURRICANE SCATTERING and if we ‘position our viewing selves’ within this all-including SOLAR IRRADIANCE WAVE-FIELD, we are no longer constrained to the BINARY LOGIC options of the Conservative PUSHING (hurricane stirring up the atmosphere) or Liberal PULLING (atmosphere stirring up the hurricane).  In Modern physics, this third level of logical understanding is termed ‘the including third’ (e.g. see ‘Stéphane Lupasco et le tiers inclus. De la physique quantique à l’ontologie’, by Basarab Nicolescu).

The “INCLUDING THIRD” is the WAVE-FIELD within which material forms are CONDENSATIONS as gives rise to QUANTUM LOGIC, the BOTH/AND logic of the INCLUDING medium.  In this QUANTUM LOGIC understanding of reality, which, by the way, is the indigenous aboriginal traditional understanding wherein ‘everything is related’  (mitakuye oyasin) by way of all things being CONDENSATIONS within an all-including WAVE-FIELD aka ‘the GREAT MYSTERY’.

So, LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES OF ALL THREE TYPES EXIST and have their respective FOLLOWINGS although the WESTERN CULTURE is currently DOMINANT in the world and because it has chosen a BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, it is now in the throes of a POLARIZING FRAGMENTATION wherein roughly half of the WESTERN CULTURE FOLLOWER GROUP embraces the CONSERVATIVE reality understanding where ‘reality works by male pushing’ and the other half embraces the LIBERAL reality understanding where ‘reality works by female pulling’.   WITHOUT some kind of PSYCHOLOGICAL JOLT to get the polarized opposing mindsets UP to the less simple level of the including third where the logic is BOTH/AND rather than EITHER/OR, we remain STUCK with an interminable BINARY LOGIC based STANDOFF of Conservative versus Liberal.

(The STANDOFF is interminable because the reality is less simple than can be explained by EITHER the Conservative view where the HURRICANE  [individual] assertively stirs up the ATMOSPHERE [crowd] OR the Liberal view where the ATMOSPHERE [crowd] inductively stirs up the HURRICANE [individual] in that the less simple reality is that the SOLAR IRRADIANT WAVE-FIELD [ambient tension] is IMMANENT in the TRANSFORMING PLENUM that includes BOTH male asserting AND female accommodating POLAR AGENCIES.)

An IMPORTANT LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “ANCHOR” that is BLOCKING our embrace of the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM lies in the LESS SIMPLE structure of DIFFERENTIATION which plays a foundational role in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE as compared to INTEGRATION which plays a foundational role in INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL ‘BOTH/AND’ language induced thinking.  That is, the language-based use of DIFFERENTIATION imposes BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC as in ‘that is EITHER part of the TOWN OR part of the LANDSCAPE’ while the language-based use of INTEGRATION imposes QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC as in ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

Our use of DIFFERENT LANGUAGES based on different ARCHITECTURES thus CONDITIONS the THINKING PATTERNS of our PSYCHE and it is, in WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES, the influence of DIFFERENTIATION by way of BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC that is satisfying, in a manner akin to planting a simple Cuckoo’s egg in another less simple bird’s nest, a slot that is in need of a LESS SIMPLE fulfilment. In other words, the influence of INTEGRATION is ONE LEVEL LESS SIMPLE in a similar sense to the TOO SIMPLE DIFFERENTIATION based question of whether the HURRICANE assertively stirs up the ATMOSPHERE or whether the ATMOSPHERE inductively stirs up the HURRICANE; i.e. by OPENING OUR MIND to the less simple level of the SOLAR IRRADIANCE FIELD, we upgrade from DIFFERENTIATION to INTEGRATION and thus from EITHER/OR BINARY LOGIC to BOTH/AND QUANTUM LOGIC.  We are in VOYEUR viewing mode when we split our options into whether the HURRICANE assertively forces changes in the ATMOSPHERE or whether the ATMOSPHERE inductively pulls forth HURRICANES.   The VOYEUR IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE EVENTS HE IS IMPOSING JUDGEMENT ON.

In shifting to the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC, the COMPREHENDING MIND IS NO LONGER A VOYEUR BUT IS ‘the included third’ and is thus ONE-WITH-EVERYTHING which is described as follows in the terms of understanding in ADVAITA VEDANTA as shared by Schroedinger, who points out that this thinking in terms where GOD or ‘the GREAT MYSTERY’ is the whole non-visible all-including WAVE-FIELD PLENUM.  The following two quotes from Gnostic and Vedic belief both point to the transcendent “LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM’ as also in Modern physics, wherein material forms are secondary as in QUANTUM LOGIC (the all-including WAVE-FIELD is primary while material forms [condensations] are secondary) rather than primary as they are in the BINARY LOGIC based duality of ABSOLUTE MATERIAL BEING in ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS.

 

“Again when Jesus saw infants being nursed by their mothers he said, “These infants being suckled are like those entering the Kingdom.” And the disciples asked, “Shall we, then, as little children, enter the Kingdom?” He answered them, “When you make two one, and when you make the inside the outside and the outside the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the male and female one and the same…then you will enter (the Kingdom).” 

… Jesus said, “What you look forward to has already come, but you do not recognize it…the Kingdom of the Father is spread out on the earth, but men do not see it.”  The Gnostic Gospel of Thomas

 * * * 

… In Christian terminology to say: ‘Hence I am God Almighty’ sounds both blasphemous and lunatic. But please disregard these connotations for the moment and consider whether the above inference is not the closest a biologist can get to proving God and immortality at one stroke.

In itself, the insight is not new. The earliest records to my knowledge date back some 2,500 years or more. From the early great Upanishads the recognition ATHMAN = BRAHMAN (the personal self equals the omnipresent, all-comprehending eternal self) was in Indian thought considered, far from being blasphemous, to represent the quintessence of deepest insight into the happenings of the world. The striving of all the scholars of Vedanta was, after having learnt to pronounce with their lips, really to assimilate in their minds this grandest of all thoughts.

Again, the mystics of many centuries, independently, yet in perfect harmony with each other (somewhat like the particles in an ideal gas) have described, each of them, the unique experience of his or her life in terms that can be condensed in the phrase: DEUS FACTUS SUM (I have become God).

To Western ideology the thought has remained a stranger.  – Erwin Schroedinger, ‘What is LIfe’, ‘Epilogue: On Determinism and Free Will’

 

So, what I have tried to do in this preface is to point out that we have available to us, THREE OPTIONAL FORMS of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE for reality construction and that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are HUNG UP in a polarizing debate over whether the Conservative (simplest) level is better than the Liberal (next less simple) level or vice versa.  This ongoing polarizing debate is a distraction that blocks accepting the naturally more comprehensive (least simple) third level of reality supported by the LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM which RESOLVES the POLARIZING DIFFERENCES coming from BINARY LOGIC wherein BOTH the Conservative and Liberal factions consider themselves to be made up of INDEPENDENT BEINGS with their own POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING, and differ over whether the local authoring is by way of pushing (male asserting) or by pulling (female accommodating).  There is NO SOLUTION to this Conservative – Liberal polarizing issue since THERE ARE NO INDEPENDENT BEINGS that move about and interact within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE of INFINITE EXTENT, an imaginary realm wherein the unresolvable POLAR Conservative-Liberal CONFLICT and FRAGMENTATION originates.

Instead of empty space populated by absolute material beings, there is a QUANTUM LOGIC all-including WAVE-FIELD with CONDENSATIONS that have no INDEPENDENT BEING, thus the understanding of reality in terms of the all-including WAVE-FIELD PLENUM in which material forms are condensations is a QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC REALITY that HAS NO EXPOSURE TO THE SIMPLISTIC BINARY LOGIC based CONSERVATIVE VERSUS LIBERAL POLARIZING disagreement.  There is no polarizing disagreement since QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS are innately LESS SIMPLE than BINARY LOGIC LINGUISTIC REALITY CONSTRUCTIONS in the sense that the INTEGRATION based QUANTUM LOGIC UNDERSTANDING  of the ONE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD in which material forms are CONDENSATIONS, is LESS SIMPLE than the DIFFERENTIATION based BINARY LOGIC UNDERSTANDING of the TWO PART MATTER and EMPTY SPACE ONTOLOGY which leads to ambiguity over whether MALE MATERIAL BEINGS assertively fill FEMALE EMPTY HOLES or whether FEMALE EMPTY HOLES induce filling by MALE ASSERTING BEINGS. In the QUANTUM LOGIC world of Modern physics reality, there are no FRAGMENTATIVE BINARY LOGIC based ambiguities as in a choice of POLAR OPPOSITES, there is only BALANCE and IMBALANCE.

END OF PREFACE: 

 

Modern physics has shown that the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE ‘makes sense’ in a way which WESTERN CULTURE (Common Average European) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE ‘does not make sense’.  While the former is based on INTEGRATION, the latter is based on DIFFERENTIATION, and as Modern physics has shown, we live in a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM (aka WAVE-FIELD) wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED (mitakuye oyasin) which requires LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE based on INTEGRATION and is beyond comprehension by way of LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE based on DIFFERENTION.

That is, the WAVE-FIELD world has a BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING medium ARCHITECTURE wherein there is continual FORMING and RE-FORMING by way of INTEGRATION as in the case of the MICROBIOME wherein CONDENSATIONS in the energy-charged PLENUM aggregate in the manner of FOG patches that become a more extensive and general OVERCAST.

INTEGRATION is “THE FUNDAMENTAL PROCESS” in the WAVE-FIELD dynamic.

DIFFERENTIATION is only an ‘APPEARANCE” imposed by the discriminating powers of the OBSERVER.

That is, we DO KNOW from Modern physics and IT HAS BEEN LONG UNDERSTOOD by INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL CULTURES, TAOISM/BUDDHISM and ADVAITA VEDANTA that EVERYTHING IS RELATED (‘mitakuye oyasin’) and Modern physics has RE-AFFIRMED this UNIFIED understanding of the COSMOS by establishing the existence of an all-including WAVE-FIELD within which there are MATERIAL FORMS that are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

The INTEGRATED understanding of reality is in terms of the UNUM of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM as is the understanding of the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS in which the multiplicity of material forms are CONDENSATIONS within an all-including UNUM has been REAFFIRMED by Modern physics.   In order to SHARE this understanding within a system of symbols, this requires a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE based on INTEGRATION.  The understanding in terms of an OVERALL ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD which includes material forms which are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD is CONSISTENT with our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION in this ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka ‘the WAVE-FIELD’.  In this WAVE-FIELD reality, there is no way to understand ‘FORMS’ as anything other than CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD whose development and relational dynamics (relational dynamics are all there is in this overall UNUM) are inextricably bound up in the overall development of the INNATELY INTEGRAL TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD aka the Tao.

There is also the DIFFERENTIATED understanding of reality deriving from a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which REDUCES the CONDENSATIONS in the WAVE-FIELD to LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING-based FORMS and which REDUCES the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM of the WAVE-FIELD to a notional ABSOLUTE, INFINITE EMPTY SPACE, or in other words, a NON-PARTICIPATING CONTAINER that SIMPLIFIES LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE so that the SIMPLIFIED LANGUAGE need address only the MATERIAL FORMS and their movements and interactions as if they were “DIFFERENTIATED OUT” as INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEINGS with THEIR OWN ACTIONS AND INTERACTIONS operating in an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE PASSIVE (UN-INVOLVED) SPACE.

Note that there are no SEPARATE or INDEPENDENT ‘MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES’ in the INTEGRATED WAVE-FIELD reality, there is only the APPEARANCE of INDEPENDENT THINGS, an APPEARANCE THAT DOES NOT BELONG TO WAVE FIELD PHENOMENA BUT TO THE OBSERVER’S OBSERVATIONAL EXPERIENCE which only takes on a tangible form by his LANGUAGE-BASED REPORTING and thus by his REPORTING METHOD OF CHOICE which could be one of many SIGNALLING SCHEME OPTIONS, but one in which both HE (TRANSMITTER) and those who is SIGNALLING TO (RECEIVERS) are familiar with.

The ARCHITECTURE of a SIGNALLING SCHEME does NOT determine the NATURE of the forms being reported on by way of the SIGNALLING SCHEME.  For example, the ENGLISH LANGUAGE signaling scheme gives a foundational role to the DOUBLE ERROR combination of NAMING and GRAMMAR which conveys the notion of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.  In our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD, there is NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and development, however, this DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based signaling scheme as employed in the Common Average European family of languages is immensely popular on a global basis IN SPITE OF THE FRAGMENTATION problem that comes with DIFFERENTIATION based language architecture.

This is the “HUMPTY DUMPTY fell off the wall” problem where, for example, after one SPLITS OUT (DIFFERENTIATES) ‘the HUMAN’ from the transforming relational continuum and proceeds to use language to explain “IT” in terms of its component (DIFFERENTIATED) “PARTS” and ‘WHAT THESE PARTS DO” (e.g. heart, lungs, brain), WE HAVE LOST TOUCH WITH THE ‘INTEGRATION’ based understanding wherein “HUMANING” is a CONDENSATION of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD which means that THERE IS NO WAY TO UNDERSTAND “WHAT A HUMANING IN THE TRANFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM” “IS” “OUT OF THE CONTEXT OF ITS QUANTUM LOGIC INCLUSION AS A CONDENSATION IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

DIFFERENTIATION SIMPLIFIES by using BINARY LOGIC based CHOPPING OFF of relational interdependencies (this is EITHER part of the HUMAN OR NOT) while INTEGRATION in the QUANTUM LOGIC relation of CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD in the WAVE-FIELD acknowledges the INTERDEPENDENCY that comes with NATURE understood in the WAVE-FIELD sense where there are HUMANINGS IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD in which case an ANTELOPING and an EAGLEING are included in the SAME WEB-OF-LIFE (the same WAVE-FIELD) as the HUMANING, so that INTEGRATION is INNATE in nature while DIFFERENTIATION is LANGUAGE-based SIMPLIFICATION.  

This understanding that the world of our sense-experience of inclusion therein is INTEGRATION based, is NOT OVER-RULED by the fact that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have opted for a SIMPLIFIED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE based on DIFFERENTIATION which serves up BINARY LOGIC based FRAGMENTS, for the purpose of simplifying language-based reporting on the dynamics of the integral continuum of our sense-experience reality wherein EVERYTHING IS RELATED in a QUANTUM LOGIC manner as CONDENSATIONS within the all-including WAVE-FIELD.

 

THE COMPLEXITY WE OBSERVE IN THE WORLD IS NOT EXPLAINABLE IN DIFFERENTIATION BASED TERMS BECAUSE THIS COMPLEXITY IS INTEGRATION BASED WHICH MEANS THAT THERE ARE NO SENSIBLE ANSWERS TO REDUCTIONIST INQUIRY.

 

The WAVE-FIELD reality wherein there are HUMANINGS in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka the WAVE-FIELD does not lend it self to DIFFERENTIATION based understanding since there is NO WAY TO UNDERSTAND A HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM by studying what we impute to be an ‘IT”, a LOCAL, INDEPENDENTLY-EXISTING THING-IN-ITSELF as is implied NOT BY SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, but by the SIMPLIFICATION WE HAVE IMPOSED IN OUR ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN OF THE LANGUAGE WE ARE USING.  THAT IS, OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS DESIGNED TO SIMPLIFY LANGUAGE by ‘DROPPING OUT’ the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE of the ANDROGYNOUS COMBINATION of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING AND MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE NONDUALITY as is the nature of WAVE-FIELD REALITY.

 DIFFERENTIATION IS A LANGUAGE-ARCHITECTURE-DESIGN TACTIC USED TO SIMPLIFY LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE so as to BYPASS the complexity that is immanent in WAVE-FIELD REALITY which manifests as in sense-experience as a continually INTEGRATING, all-including TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka an all-including WAVE-FIELD..

 

LANGUAGE can be understood by way of INTEGRATION or by way of DIFFERENTIATION, and lets not forget that in contemplating this question, we are coming from a social collective that has become to accustomed to using a DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, that to switch our thinking (THOUGHT and LANGUAGE are tied together) to an INTEGRATION based LANGUAGE such as are used by INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, Taoists/Buddhists, Advaita Vedanta adherents and Modern physics (rheomode) we have to let go our habit of using BINARY LOGIC based thinking and switch to QUANTUM LOGIC thinking.  That is;

INTEGRATION-UNDERSTANDING is triggered by QUANTUM LOGIC language. (There is HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING)

DIFFERENTIATION-UNDERSTANDING is triggered by BINARY LOGIC language. (HUMANS move and interact in EMPTY SPACE).

Only in the DIFFERENTIATION-UNDERSTANDING case do we need EVOLUTION THEORY to explain ‘HOW HUMANS CAME TO BE’ since in the INTEGRATION-UNDERSTANDING there is NO SUCH THING AS ‘BEING’ or ‘BEINGS’ as everything is in flux in an innately interdependent way by sharing inclusion within the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD.

Nietzsche’s ‘ANTI-DARWINISM’ is exemplary of his QUANTUM LOGIC based understanding, wherein everything is included within a transforming whole, and thus there is NO NEED to come up with complicated stories WHICH ARE NECESSITATED by the INITIAL MISTAKEN CHOICE OF ‘DIFFERENTIATION’ as the JUDGEMENT IMPOSING VISUALIZING TOOL which gives forth a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE based on DIFFERENTIATION based BINARY LOGIC LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES IN EMPTY SPACE rather than INTEGRATION based QUANTUM LOGIC NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT CONDENSATIONS in the ENERGY-CHARGED WAVE-FIELD PLENUM aka TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

And do you know what “the world” is to me? Shall I show it to you in my mirror? This world: a monster of energy, without beginning, without end; a firm, iron magnitude of force that does not grow bigger or smaller, that does not expend itself but only transforms itself; as a whole, of unalterable size, a household without expenses or losses, but likewise without increase or income …” –Nietzsche, ‘The Will to Power’, 1067

There is no need for a THEORY OF EVOLUTION of the DIVERSITY OF LIVING FORMS, and there is no need to ponder how LIFE came to be on the THIRD ROCK OUT FROM THE SUN that we are calling ‘the EARTH’ because all of this FRAGMENTATION is coming from WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE rather than from the physical world.

The DIFFERENTIATION based FRAGMENTATION into MINERALS, ANIMALS and VEGETABLES is an artefact of LANGUAGE BASED ON DIFFERENTIATION.  In the Indigenous aboriginal languages, because they are based on INTEGRATION rather than DIFFERENTATION, there is no need for a THEORY OF EVOLUTION that explains the DIVERSITY of independent forms because those forms ARE NOT INDEPENDENT but are instead included features within the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM or in other words, CONDENSATIONS within the WAVE-FIELD, the ALL-INCLUDING CONTINUUM wherein the identifiable FORMINGS have a QUANTUM LOGIC relation with the WAVE-FIELD CONTINUUM or as in Nietzsche’s terms a A TRANSFORMING WHOLE.

WITHOUT our imposing of DIFFERENTIATION, there is no need for an EVOLUTIONARY THEORY to explain HOW the different “forms of life” “CAME TO BE” because THERE ARE NO SUCH THINGS AS “BEINGS’, there are only relational features within a CONTINUAL BECOMING, an overall INTEGRATION.  In other words, the DIFFERENTIATION is not coming from NATURE, the DIFFERENTIATION is coming from WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which uses WORDS as PSYCHOLOGIC TRIGGERS to, for example, SPLIT OUT the HUMANINGS in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM and RE-CONSTITUTE THEM as INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEINGS in a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

This is case of LANGUAGE and its PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPRESSION TRIGGERING using DIFFERENTIATION to simplify and overcome the complexities of the INTEGRATED transforming relational continuum wherein, for example, there is no way to extricate HUMANINGS in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM from the all-including WEB-OF-LIFE aka TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.  In other words, the WESTERN CULTURE practice of using LANGUAGE, nor only to DIFFERENTIATE OUT HUMANINGS-in-the-TRANSFORMING-CONTINUUM and RE-PRESENT THEM as notional LOCAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES with GRAMMAR-given POWERS of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.

It is on this BOGUS BASIS of DIFFERENTIATION that WESTERN CULTURE has been constructing ARTIFICIAL REALITIES which are seen as EMPTY SPACES populated by INDEPENDENT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES purportedly with THEIR OWN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments.

While this COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN language architecture appears to ‘work well’ and, perhaps because of its simplicity, has become a global ‘backup default’.  But as we know, there can be a huge gap between language based signaling of sense-experiences and the actual sense-experiences so that the EXPERIENCE-GROUNDED MEANING or UNDERSTANDING taken from the language signaling may be far more complex than the SIGNALS which trigger such meaning and it is up to the RECEIVER to FILL IN THE BLANKS or to GET INTO THE HEAD OF THE TRANSMITTER of LANGUAGE-based messaging.

Often, this is NOT the case and there is an imperfect association between the transmitted SIGNAL in the language burst and the receiver’s interpretation/translation which may lead to communications error;

An example of the potential for confusion here comes to mind in the story where two females in a convertible pass a male driver who is going in the opposite direction and yell out to him PIG! Taken aback, he quickly responds BITCH!   That is just before he crashes into a large pig that has got through the fencing and is in the middle of the highway.

What can GO WRONG in this manner differs depending on whether the signaling scheme is INTEGRATION or DIFFERENTIATION based. These are BOTH methods of information sharing and while INTEGRATION is QUANTUM LOGIC based, DIFFERENTIATION is BINARY LOGIC based.  For example, we can share understanding using a web of relations which MAKES NO ASSUMPTION OF ANY LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING BASED THING-IN-ITSELF as plays a foundational role in DIFFERENTIATION as where we develop an understanding of an ‘organism’ by dissecting it so as to understand it it in an INSIDE-OUTWARD mechanical operation based sense.  INTEGRATION, on the other hand, employs outside-inward informational inference which Modern physics researchers Geoffrey Chew and John Wheeler describe inter of the ‘Surprise version of the Game of Twenty Questions’.  The point here is that in the WAVE-FIELD reality where there are no LOCAL EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES, forms develop in a purely relational manner; i.e.

“A constructively interfering matrix of propositions can infer something which lies innately beyond them.  The ‘surprise version of the game of Twenty Questions of modern physics (Geoffrey Chew and John Wheeler) makes this case.   Understanding can lie in bringing a multiplicity of interfering propositions into connective confluence and extracting the coherency that develops in the confluence as the take-away understanding (as also in holography).”

THIS DESCRIBES AN INTEGRATION BASED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is NOT DEPENDENT ON, and DOES NOT PRESUPPOSE…  THE EXISTENCE OF ANY LOCAL, EXPLICIT THING, thus keeping the door open to understanding that of a REALITY that is PURELY RELATIONAL such as is the case within a TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM.

In this INTEGRATION based understanding of reality, the CONTAINER and CONTENT are DUAL ASPECTS of ONE REALITY and this COMPLEX RELATION points to the WAVE-FIELD ARCHITECTURE with its FEMALE ACCOMMODATING —MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE STRUCTURE, these two conjugates being referred to in mathematics as the REAL and IMAGINARY components of the COMPLEX SIGNAL.

The WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE DESIGN can be seen, in its orientation to DIFFERENTIATION rather than INTEGRATION as the DROPPING OUT of the IMAGINARY component of the COMPLEX WAVE-SIGNAL, so that we have a LANGUAGE that has been DUMBED DOWN to SIGNALLING that employs only the MALE ASSERTING ASPECT where, for example, we speak in such terms as ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods’ where we go into all kinds of detail which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and concerning the MALE ASSERTING ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT almost as if all of this was taking place within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT since there is NO MENTION of the PARTICIPATION of a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate.

DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE thus captures ONLY A SIMPLIFIED rendering of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD of our sense-experience of inclusion therein, in the (simplified) ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING TERMS ONLY as corresponds to the DROPPING OUT of the IMAGINARY COMPONENT and retaining only the REAL COMPONENT of the WAVE-FIELD COMPLEX SIGNAL.

SUMMARY:  WE LIVE AS CONDENSATIONS WITHIN THE ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM AKA THE ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM AKA THE WAVE-FIELD AKA THE TAO which implies a QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation wherein FIGURE and GROUND are only one since the FIGURE is a CONDENSATION of the GROUND.

However, our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE uses a simplified rendering scheme for REALITY based on DIFFERENTIATION rather than INTEGRATION (the MODERN PHYSICS and INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL) option for renderings of reality).

The DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE SCHEME of WESTERN CULTURE performs the equivalent of the reduction of WAVE-FIELD reality to the REAL component only, or in other words to the MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE of ANDROGYNOUS (FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING and MALE-ASSERTING CONJUGATE RELATION).

This ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING ONLY WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is the source of the MALE-ASSERTING ONE-SIDEDNESS in our language-supported CONCEPTUALIZING of dynamics as gives rise to DIFFERENTIATION in place of INTEGRATION, and thus to (BINARY LOGIC) expressions like ‘the HUMAN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING actions and developments’ as contrasted with the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL and MODERN PHYSICS INTEGRATION conveying language architecture which gives LESS SIMPLE (QUANTUM LOGIC) expressions like ‘There is HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ where the understanding is that the HUMANING is an INTRINSIC ASPECT of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’.

The WESTERN CULTURE DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE essential to the INTEGRATION based understanding of ‘HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’ is one way of DEFINING the operative WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE representation of reality which is DIFFERENTIATION based, which is equivalent to the DROPPING OUT of the “IMAGINARY COMPONENT’ of the COMPLEX SIGNAL.

The INTEGRATION based language is thus LESS SIMPLE than the DIFFERENTIATION based language in the respect that the former is “COMPLEX” in that it includes BOTH real AND imaginary component, or in other words, BOTH male-asserting AND female-accommodating physical conjugates.

The downside of WESTERN CULTURE having employed the SIMPLIFIED DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE which DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and constructs linguistic realities with the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE has been the source of FRAGMENTATION in the WESTERN CULTURE MIND and in the WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL DYNAMIC, as pointed out by Bohm;

1 FRAGMENTATION AND WHOLENESS (from Wholeness and the Implicate Order by David Bohm)

The title of this chapter is ‘Fragmentation and wholeness’. It is especially important to consider this question today, for fragmentation is now very widespread, not only throughout society, but also in each individual; and this is leading to a kind of general confusion of the mind, which creates an endless series of problems and interferes with our clarity of perception so seriously as to prevent us from being able to solve most of them.

Thus art, science, technology, and human work in general, are divided up into specialities, each considered to be separate in essence from the others. Becoming dissatisfied with this state of affairs, men have set up further interdisciplinary subjects, which were intended to unite these specialities, but these new subjects have ultimately served mainly to add further separate fragments. Then, society as a whole has developed in such a way that it is broken up into separate nations and different religious, political, economic, racial groups, etc. Man’s natural environment has correspondingly been seen as an aggregate of separately existent parts, to be exploited by different groups of people. Similarly, each individual human being has been fragmented into a large number of separate and conflicting compartments, according to his different desires, aims, ambitions, loyalties, psychological characteristics, etc., to such an extent that it is generally accepted that some degree of neurosis is inevitable, while many individuals going beyond the ‘normal’ limits of fragmentation are classified as paranoid, schizoid, psychotic, etc.”

 

* * * 

To REPEAT the crux of the above described findings, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE has an architecture which corresponds to the DROPPING OUT of the IMAGINARY component (the FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE) of the REAL (male-asserting) plus IMAGINARY (female accommodating) component of the COMPLEX SIGNAL which describes WAVE-FIELD phenomena that are INTEGRATION and QUANTUM LOGIC based.  WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, due to the DROPPING OUT of the IMAGINARY (female accommodating) component give SIMPLIFIED signal which is SIMPLIFIED by reduction of the ANDROGYNOUS or COMPLEX REAL-plus-IMAGINARY WAVE-FIELD signal to ONE-SIDED REAL component only terms..

Note that this REDUCTION of the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD to ONE-SIDED REAL SIGNAL ONLY TERMS (MALE ASSERTING ACTION ONLY TERMS) is only happening within our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE so that while our language informed THOUGHT and our language informed ACTIONS are impacted, our direct sense experience continues to understand ‘reality’ on a full ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD basis wherein, for example, we understand that there are HUMANINGS IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, even though our own language is “telling us different”; i.e. that HUMANS are INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BEINGS that are moving about and interacting within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

The evident CONFLICT between WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based SUBSTITUTE REALITY which has been DUMBED DOWN to one-sided MALE ASSERTING ONLY ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS and our WESTERN CULTURE SENSE-EXPERIENCE which remains the full-blown COMPLEX (real plus imaginary) sense-experience, so that while we speak in the terms that ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services’, our sense-experience is informing us in the LESS SIMPLE TERMS that ‘there is TOWNING (HUMANING) in the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’.

NOTA BENE: The QUANTUM LOGIC understanding associates with overall TRANSFORMING in which case there is NO PLACE for DARWINIAN EVOLUTION THEORY since there is NO PLACE FOR DIFFERENTIATION.  DIFFERENTIATION implies that THERE IS A THING that is UNDERGOING PROGRESS CHANGE. THIS IS A ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ACTION and DEVELOPMENT.

DIFFERENTIATION is the REAL COMPONENT of the COMPLEX DYNAMIC of TRANSFORMATION wherein there is a CONJUGATE IMAGINARY COMPONENT.  We can understanding this in the example that the AVALANCHE is a DIFFERENTIATION of the MOUNTAIN but this doesn’t speak to how the IMAGINARY ‘GESTALT’ of the MOUNTAIN now has a HOLE in it. As Heraclitus said, A man can’t step into the same river twice for he is not the same man and the river is not the same river.

TRANSFORMATION is ANDROGYNOUS in that the MALE ASSERTING action of the AVALANCHE has a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE; i.e. the OPENING OF A HOLE IN THE MOUNTAIN, the combination of the MALE ASSERTING AVALANCHE and the FEMALE OPENING OF A HOLE together constituting TRANSFORMATION of the OVERALL GESTALT.

The IMPORTANT POINT here is that DIFFERENTIATION only deals in the MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE which crops up in mathematics in that in the operation of INTEGRATION, we have to add back a CONSTANT because there is a loss of essential GESTALT DETAIL in the DIFFERENTIATION action.

It is as if we have the full pile of rubble from and AVALANCHE and we have access to the MOUNTAIN WITH THE HOLE IN IT from the AVALANCHE and we are charged with putting the RUBBLE back into the HOLE to restore the MOUNTAIN to its ORIGINAL CONDITION.  But the original GESTALT involves relations involving the overall LANDSCAPE where, for example, the reflection of the sun from a shiny surface of one of the original rock faces illuminated a certain point on a nearby mountain at the time of the summer solstice.  SO, the point is that DIFFERENTIATION is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and this is SIMPLER than TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT since DIFFERENTIATION only DEFINES THE MALE CHANGE without capture of the FEMALE CHANGE.

In the same sense, the GROWTH of the TOWN is just the REAL COMPONENT of what is going on which does not tell the story of how many animal paths were disrupted or snake trails or eagle nesting grounds forced to relocate, which changed the surrounding landscape, thus to speak of the GROWTH of the TOWN is to make the mistake of ignoring GOEDEL’S THEOREM of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite LOGICAL PROPOSITIONS since the reality is that what is that the overall GESTALT is changing which means that the dynamic underway is TRANSFORMATION and NOT GROWTH.

The concept of DIFFERENTIATION is the basis of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and it is a MISTAKE because it is a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY BINARY LOGIC construction that addresses the LOCAL and EXPLICIT and ignores the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMING GESTALT.

The concept of DIFFERENTIATION is just the starting point for language-based signaling that keys to the notional existence of THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES which, so we say, undergo evolutionary development.  In the WAVE-FIELD understanding (i.e. the Modern physic understanding) while there are THINGS which are CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD, these CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD are APPEARANCES and NOT MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES that can be understood by DIFFERENTIATING them down into their own local parts and components.

WE cannot make sense out of LOCAL, EXPLICIT FRAGMENTS of “DIFFERENTIATION” in a WAVE-FIELD world wherein everything is connected within a relational flux.  Understanding the AVALANCHE is understanding DIFFERENTIATION which orients to LOCAL EXPLICIT changes but in order to understand the reality of TRANSFORMATION, we must acknowledge the INTEGRATION of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (also called the IMAGINARY COMPONENT) with the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (also called the REAL COMPONENT) and thus understand the INTEGRAL GESTALT which is the ANDROGYNOUS or COMPLEX (REAL + IMAGINARY) reality constituting the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.

* * *

 

FOOTNOTE:

In the comparison of DIFFERENTIATION and INTEGRATION, we run into the fact that INTEGRATION is LESS SIMPLE than DIFFERENTIATION and that is coming from the fact that INTEGRATION is COMPLEX while DIFFERENTIATION reduces ANDROGYNOUS COMPLEXITY to the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING component.   Instead of the ANDROGYNOUS conceptualizing of ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which is an INTEGRATION based QUANTUM LOGIC proposition as employed by Indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS employ declarations such as ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’ which is a DIFFERENTIATION based BINARY LOGIC proposition.

As mentioned in the earlier discussion, INTEGRATION as in ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ incorporates both REAL and IMAGINARY components while DIFFERENTIATION incorporates only the REAL component which is inadequate for conveying WAVE-FIELD realities.  In other words, Indigenous aboriginal language architecture supports COMPLEX WAVE-FIELD level signaling while WESTERN CULTURE language architecture DROPS out the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING conjugate and limits signaling to the REAL component only.

The popularity of REAL-component-only languages such as the Common Average European languages appears to derive from it’s SIMPLICITY and its attribution of actions and development FULL AND SOLELY to a MALE ASSERTING AUTHORING AGENCY without the complication of addressing FEMALE ACCOMMODATING induction.  As in the THIN SKULL RULE this means that simplicity can be and is being engineered into CAE languages such as English by the OBSCURANTISM of DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD conjugate, allowing us to speak in the plain terms of ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ without mention of the FEMALE CONJUGATE of the ‘SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS’.  This is equivalent to saying that our standard WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE architecture is a FLAT-SPACE architecture while language like Bohm’s Rheomode and the Indigenous aboriginal languages are CURVED SPACE architectures which incorporate complex conjugate signaling structure.

The SIMPLER WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE architecture has the FRAGMENTATION ISSUE as Bohm notes, which is continuing to build and which no doubt figures in such phenomena as the rise in mass shootings.

 * * *