We have built BINARY LOGIC into our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE yet our SENSE-EXPERIENCE is QUANTUM LOGIC based.  While we use BINARY LOGIC to impute a MUTUAL EXCLUSIVE relationship between MATTER and SPACE, our Modern physics understanding of reality, as well as the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL and Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta understanding of reality is QUANTUM LOGIC BASED where there is a BOTH/AND relation between the WAVE-FIELD and CONDENSATIONS of the WAVE-FIELD.    What we SEE and capture in language is;  (A) MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS IN the all-including NON-VISIBLE WAVE-FIELD which manifest a QUANTUM LOGIC relation,… and (B), MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES in a NON-VISIBLE because notionally ABSOLUTE EMPTY, SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT which have a BINARY LOGIC relation with EMPTY SPACE.

While the WAVE-FIELD is the PRIMARY AUTHORING AGENCY in (A),  in (B), the secondary CONDENSATIONS within the WAVE-FIELD are GRAMMATICALLY GIVEN the PRIMARY AUTHORING AGENCY.  The (B) understanding is a seriously flawed OBSCURANTIST view which continues to infuse dysfunction into the WESTERN CULTURE social dynamic.  It is OBSCURANTIST in that it attributes all action to MALE ASSERTING, having SUBSTITUTED “EMPTY SPACE” for the PRIMARY AUTHORING AGENCY of the WAVE-FIELD, thus UNNATURALLY RE-CASTING the SECONDARY CONDENSATIONS (such as ‘humans’) as PRIMARY AUTHORS (prompting Nietzsche’s GOD is DEAD, we have killed him RANT.)

While sense-experience and indigenous aboriginals and Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta and Modern physics support the (A) understanding, the popular WESTERN CULTURE support goes to the (B) understanding which is OBSCURANTIST in that it NULLS OUT the FEMALE NONLOCAL-IMPLICIT WAVE-FIELD conjugate and presents the MALE-ASSERTING AGENTS IN EMPTY SPACE as if that OBSCURANTIST VIEW were ‘reality’. How this happens and some of the consequences are the subject of this note.

  * * *

 

 

 

 

WE ALL KNOW, BUT FEW SPEAK ABOUT IT THAT ‘SUBOPTIMIZATION’ IS UNREAL ABSTRACTION.  In other words, the notion of COMPETITION, since it is based on SUBOPTIMIZATION (e.g. the claim that a powerful NATION makes that their ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION OUTDO THE ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of ANOTHER NATION), … IS UNREAL.

In is UNREAL because there is NO SUCH THING as LOCAL EXPLICIT INDEPENDENT HINGS (NATIONS, HUMANS, CORPORATIONS) WITH THEIR OWN POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION. That is a BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION whereas the reality is the QUANTUM LOGIC reality of NATIONING, HUMANING and CORPORATIONING in the transforming relational continuum wherein EVERYTHING IS IN CONTINUAL FLUX, hence the ‘ING’ suffix on the NAMES that imply LOCAL EXPLICIT THING-IN-ITSELF BEING, which softens the BEING into BECOMING as appropriate to the WAVE-FIELD reality..

Note that in order to USE THIS Common Average European language to talk about the shortfalls of BINARY LOGIC (the EITHER/OR LOGIC of the EXCLUDED medium; e.g. MATTER in EMPTY SPACE) vis a vis QUANTUM LOGIC (the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING medium; e.g. CONDENSATIONS of the electromagnetic WAVE-FIELD within the WAVE-FIELD, we must keep in mind that this CAE language is NOT DESIGNED for delivering QUANTUM LOGIC representations; e.g. I can easily use this language to craft representations in MALE-ASSERTING TERMS which are LOCAL and EXPLICIT such as “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.

But it is not as easy to craft representations in FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING TERMS which are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, and if fact, it is necessary to go all the way to TRANSFORMATION which is the CONJUGATE RELATION  of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING and MALE ASSERTING.  So on the one hand we can speak in the MALE ASSERTING terms of ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which is BINARY LOGIC based  as if the TOWN is INDEPENDENT of the CONTAINING SPACE it is included in where FIGURE and GROUND are TWO, … and on other hand we can speak in terms of “‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which is QUANTUM LOGIC based as if the TOWNING is INCLUDED in the CONTAINING WAVE-FIELD where FIGURE and GROUND are ONE

 

The different in understanding coming from BINARY LOGIC and QUANTUM LOGIC can be confusing and it crops up all of the time in our language based exchanges.  For example, COMPETITION is a BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION as discussed here;

 

If TWO OR MORE NATIONS “COMPETE” IN THE GROWTH OF LAND-CLEARING and CULTIVATING (and agricultural, mining, logging etc. production), …… WHO IS KEEPING TRACK of the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS?   The initial proposition assumes BINARY LOGIC while the question assumes QUANTUM LOGIC and while QUANTUM LOGIC is he LOGIC affirmed by our sense-experience, BINARY LOGIC is something we commonly use in our REASONING, but BINARY LOGIC is OBSCURANTIST because it cannot deal with QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relations which pervade nature.

 

As soon as one acknowledges that THERE IS A CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE OF WILDERNESS, the previous LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION as in the BINARY LOGIC ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING terms of LOCAL GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION, … this “MAKES NO SENSE”…because the GROWTH of a cultivated area is a one-sided MALE-ASSERTING CONCEPT that could only happen in a FLAT EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT which is BINARY LOGIC (EITHER SOMETHING OR NOTHING) based.  Since we are included within a SPHERICAL SPACE of FINITE extent (the surface of the earth), the GROWTH of cultivated land IS ALWAYS accompanied by a CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE of WILDERNESS (uncultivated) LAND.

 

In the real SPHERICAL SPACE of our sense experience of inclusion therein, there is ALWAYS a FEMALE-MALE CONJUGATE relation in such matters, … THAT MEANWHILE, WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS “DROP OUT” OF OUR LANGUAGE-BASED REPRESENTATIONS, which results in OBSCURANTISM.

 

OBSCURANTISM: the practice of deliberately preventing the facts or full details of something from becoming known.

 

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, IN OUR “NORMAL” MODE OF BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE CONSTRUCTION OF REPRESENTATIONS OF “REALITY”, ARE OBSCURANTIST.

(more…)