OVERVIEW: We live in the all-including WAVE-FIELD.  We are INCLUSIONS (CONDENSATIONS) within the WAVE-FIELD.  The WAVE-FIELD embodies the conjugate relation of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING FIELD and MALE-ASSERTING MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS such that the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING FIELD INCLUDES THE MALE ASSERTING CONDENSATION, in a QUANTUM LOGIC “BOTH/AND” sense.  In WESTERN CULTURE, OBSCURANTIST abstraction has been popularized which falsely “PROMOTES” the NOTION of MALE-ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS AUTHORED by MATERIAL CONDENSATIONS, putting these SECONDARY CONDENSATIONS INTO PRIMARY REALITY CONSTITUTING STATUS supported by the use of NAMING and GRAMMAR to impute the existence of LOCAL BEINGS with LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING actions and developments. By ELEVATING IN STATUS, THE WAVE-FIELD CONDENSINGS (dynamic forms within the TRANSFORMING WAVE-FIELD) to ABSOLUTE PERSISTING BEING STATUS WITH ‘NAMING’, and using GRAMMAR to equip these notional MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES with notional LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS, the familiar WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-based SUBSTITUTE REALITY IS CREATED with its BINARY LOGIC MATTER and EMPTY SPACE ARCHITECTURE.  REALITY REPRESENTATIONS based on this unnatural elevating of CONDENSATIONS (‘whorls’ in the continuing transformation) of the WAVE-FIELD to PRIMARY FIXED, EXPLICIT, PERSISTING MATERIAL CONTENT STATUS (by reducing the WAVE-FIELD to a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT) establishes an abstract BINARY LOGIC MATTER-and-SPACE SUBSTITUTE REALITY, the deployment of which as the OPERATIVE REALITY of WESTERN CULTURE is OBSCURANTISM, the simplicity of which shuts out the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC sense-experience affirmed reality. It is SIMPLER to use the BINARY LOGIC CONSTRUCTS such as the TOWN is GROWING, than to use the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC CONSTRUCTS such as ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.  The result has been the predominating use in WESTERN CULTURE of the MORE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC that has in turn led to OBSCURANTISM on an epidemic scale and to “LOCK-IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS”.

* * *

 

WHY DO WE STICK WITH BINARY LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE THAT IS DRIVING US (WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS) CRAZY?

 

In systems science terms, WE ARE “LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS”, … a common example the ‘entrapment’ is where we buy a MICROSOFT P.C. but then discover that an APPLE is far better, but by that time we have added perhaps DEVELOPED applications that are custom-fitted to our MICROSOFT PERSONAL COMPUTER, so that while we can afford to purchase an APPLIE, … the cost of migrating all our applications is many times the cost of acquiring the APPLE, and these are COSTS THAT DO NOT ARISE if we STAY WITH WHAT WE ALREADY HAVE.

 

What we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have is a LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION OF THE WORLD that is a ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING based REPRESENTATION which DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, as where we in our BINARY LOGIC based Common Average European ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING languages say ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, … instead of as the indigenous aboriginal in their QUANTUM LOGIC based languages say; ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ (in their TWO-SIDED conjugate relation including “BOTH” FEMALE ACCOMMODATING “AND” MALE ASSERTING).

 

NOTICE THAT in the LATTER, QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND language based representations, the MALE ALE ASSERTING is NO LONGER LOCAL AND EXPLICIT as it was in our WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC based linguistic representation, so in our imagination, the QUANTUM LOGIC version lets see the TOWNING and the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE as being in a DANCE TOGETHER where the MALE-ASSERTING TOWNING is continually adapting to the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE IT IS AN INCLUDED PARTICIPANT IN.  In other words, these two things are REALLY ONLY ONE but have the APPEARANCE of TWO, so that it is possible to custom tailor our language based representation to treat the ONE as TWO so that instead of saying THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, we can say ‘the TOWN is GROWING as if it were INDEPENDENT of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and was instead situated within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, … so as to make sure that we treated the CONTAINER as a PASSIVE, NON-PARTICIPANT in the actions and development of the CONTENT.

 

By DIVORCING the CONTENT from the CONTAINER, we inherit what the Presocratics called ‘the BURDEN OF CONCRETENESS’ because NOW WE HAVE TO COME UP WITH WORDS TO CRAFT A REPRESENTATION WHERE “WE” MANAGE THE REPRESENTATION OF ACTION AND DEVELOPMENT, something that the Indigenous aboriginals don’t have to deal with in their language since they never adopted the ploy of DIVORCING THE CONTENT FROM THE CONTAINER as is the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-based-REPRESENTATION approach.

 

‘Toto, I’ve a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore!’

(more…)