POSTSCRIPT TO: UNDERSTANDING How DIFFERENTIATION and INTEGRATION figure in WESTERN CULTURE “FRAGMENTATION”

 

 

IF WE START FROM THE LAST NOTE, … THE KEY PREMISE CAN BE FOUND IN THE DISCUSSION OF THE ‘THIN SKULL RULE’.  EVEN THOUGH WE KNOW FULL WELL THAT THE MALE ASSERTING PUNCH IS INSUFFICIENT TO EXPLAIN THE COLLAPSING OF THE THIN SKULL, … since this ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ACTION IS INNATELY TOO SIMPLE and IN BASIC CONTRADICTION TO THE WAVE-FIELD understanding of reality THE FEMALE_ACCOMMODATING—MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE understanding aka the  Yin/Yang understanding, …  which is embraced not only by INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS BUT ALSO AFFIRMED BY MODERN PHYSICS.

 

I AM SIMPLY AFFIRMING, and HAVE SAID NOTHING HERE TO CONTRADICT, ..  THE GREAT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE ON THIS TOPIC AS AFFIRMED BY BUDDHISTS AND BY BOHM and NIETZSCHE and SCHROEDINGER and WITTGENSTEIN AND OTHERS, …

 

SO THE SCRUTINIZING OF THIS NOTE NEED NOT GO BACK TO REVIEWING THOSE QUANTUM LOGIC UNDERSTANDINGS, the SCRUTINY NEEDS TO GO TO WHY WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS CONTINUE TO EMPLOY BINARY LOGIC BASED LANGUAGE TO CONSTRUCT REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY WHEN WE KNOW THAT OUR SENSE EXPERIENCE REALITY CONFORMS WITH QUANTUM LOGIC WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE.

 

WHY?  THE ANSWER IS CLEAR.  IN SYSTEMS TERMS, “WE ARE LOCKED IN BY HIGH SWITCHING COSTS”.   DO WE WANT TO FACE UP TO THE “COST” IN “SOCIAL RE-ADJUSTMENT TERMS” IN OUR BINARY LOGIC INFUSED SOCIAL RELATIONAL COMMON PRACTICES, OF “UPGRADING” FROM “BINARY LOGIC” TO “QUANTUM LOGIC” AS IS CALLED FOR IN THE “UPGRADE” FROM “NEWTONIAN BINARY LOGIC BASED REPRESENTATIONS OF REALITY WHICH ARE OF A MECHANISTIC (ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY ) “SUBSTITUTE REALITY”?

 

ANSWER: The SWITCHING COSTS ARE HUGE AND  INCLUDE;

 

-1- REVAMPING THE WESTERN JUSTICE SYSTEM.  MODERN PHYSICS CONFIRMS THAT THE INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM ‘MAKES SENSE’ IN THAT IT IS BASED ON THE UNDERSTANDING THAT WE LIVE IN A RELATIONAL WORLD WHEREIN THERE IS NO SUCH THING, … AS THERE IS ASSUMED TO BE IN WESTERN JUSTICE, …  AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” as is supported in WESTERN CULTURE GENERALLY and which is ABSTRACTION coming from the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE; i.e. from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which IMPUTES “LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments” and which is used to construct a LOCAL AUTHORING BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, while all the while, our SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY is informing us we share inclusion in a transforming relational continuum (aka the WAVE-FIELD) wherein the dynamics are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational).  IN OTHER WORDS, “LOCAL AUTHORING” IS A SCAM!  IT IS THE PRODUCT OF THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR.

 

This PARTICULAR ERROR, ‘the DOUBLE ERROR’, RADICALLY REVISES WESTERN CULTURE CONCEPTS OF JUSTICE, MEDICINE and COMMERCE, and thus the FOUNDATIONAL STRUCTURE OF WESTERN CULTURE ADMINISTRATION SYSTEMS, all of which are HEAVILY SHAPED by the influence of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which IMPUTES “LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments”

(more…)