Archive for May, 2023

This ESSAY has TWO LEVELS OF PREFACE.   WHY TWO LEVELS OF PREFACE?

Die Philosophie ist ein Kampf gegen die Verhexung  unsres Verstandes durch die Mittel unserer Sprache” (Philosophy is a battle against the bewitchment of our intelligence by means of our language.)” – Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations

Language based on the LOCAL and EXPLICIT has a problem in that the world of our sense-experience, i.e. the all-including transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD is inherently NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (flowing) so that MATERIAL FORMS are APPEARANCES as associate with CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD.  This relation between CONDENSATIONS of WAVE-FIELD (material forms) and WAVE-FIELD is NOT a BINARY LOGIC relation; i.e. THERE ARE NOT TWO SEPARATE THINGS HERE, there is only the ONE THING; i.e. the WAVE-FIELD in which CONDENSATIONS manifest as MATERIAL FORMS and here there is a QUANTUM LOGIC relation where the LOGIC captures the understanding that the VISIBLE MATERIAL FORM is NOT INDEPENDENT of its ‘containing space’ as in the BINARY LOGIC relation, the REALITY being that THERE IS NO ‘CONTAINING SPACE’ populated by “INDEPENDENT” MATERIAL FORMS (as in the BINARY LOGIC understanding), there is only the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD within which MATERIAL FORMS ARE CONDENSATIONS, thus the physical reality of our inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD entails the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM.  In this case, because all material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the ONE WAVE-FIELD, ALL MATERIAL FORMS ARE RELATED as is acknowledged in Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, which is contrary to WESTERN CULTURE where material forms in the flow are imputed to have INDEPENDENT STATUS thanks to simple DECLARATIONS, which are backed up by military force, and which make no impression at all on on the four-leggeds and winged and slithering ones.

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS THEREFORE HAVE A PROBLEM COMING FROM OUR GIVING A FOUNDATIONAL ROLE, IN OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, TO BINARY LOGIC.  Once BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE is used to construct CONCEPTUALIZATIONS of the world of our sense-experience, THE SIMPLIFYING DEED IS DONE which involves the DROPPING OUT of essential information; i.e. the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE which is the INTEGRATING PLENUM, leaving behind as the SOLE MAKE-UP for our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE (absolute material entities as if in empty, infinite space).

The DROPPING OUT, in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate, which gives rise to ABSTRACT ONE SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING AGENTS that we endow with GRAMMAR-based POWERS of LOCAL, JUMPSTART AUTHORING of actions and developments (e.g. “THE TOWN IS GROWING”) that constitute our WESTERN CULTURE REALITY, which in this essay is referred to as REALITY NUMBER TWO, leaving the label REALITY NUMBER ONE for the full ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD REALITY which includes BOTH the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING conjugate AND the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate.

Discussing this, as in this essay, is challenged by the fact that this language I am using (English) like all the WESTERN Common Average European languages, has a BINARY LOGIC based ARCHITECTURE which is innately TOO SIMPLE to develop language-based QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS; e.g. to get to the full QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION, one needs to use language architecture akin to the MODERN PHYSICS and indigenous aboriginal language architecture which supports “REALITY NUMBER ONE” which one captures in saying the equivalent of “THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM”

This QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization captures the BOTH/AND relation of CONTENT and CONTAINER, in accord with the CONTENT being a CONDENSATION of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD CONTAINER).  This is in contrast to the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE STANDARD where one speaks in the BINARY LOGIC terms of “THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services) which conveys the EITHER/OR relation of CONTENT and CONTAINER, imputing MUTUAL EXCLUSIVITY.  This WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED INVERSION that puts DIFFERENTIATION into an UNNATURAL PRECEDENCE over INTEGRATION,’DEMOLISHES’ the natural MATERIAL-CONTENT-AS-CONDENSATION-INCLUDED-WITHIN-WAVE-FIELD-CONTAINER relationship wherein everything is naturally INTEGRATED since the material forms are CONDENDSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM aka WAVE-FIELD.  “INSTEAD”, the INTEGRATION IS “DENIED” or rather “OBSCURED” by the use of the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (Nietzsche) which uses GRAMMAR to equip MATERIAL FORMS WITH THEIR OWN ‘ON-BOARD’ NOTIONALLY ‘SELF-SOURCED’ POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT.  THIS “LOCAL AUTHORING” ABSTRACTION IS THE RECIPE FOR FRAGMENTATION WHICH HAS BEEN SALTED INTO WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES WITH THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR.

This PREFACE speaks to the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE based infusing of FRAGMENTATION which makes its way, thanks to language, into WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHES and from there into the PHYSICAL ACTIONS of WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES.  For example, the ENTIRELY UNREALISTIC (as affirmed by sense-experience) DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE of NAMING-INSTANTIATED ‘FRAGMENTS’ where such SYNTHETIC FRAGMENTATION is supported by the ASSOCIATED abstraction of the ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE that WESTERN CULTURE language sets up as a PLAYING FRIELD for the FRAGMENTATION based REALITY NUMBER TWO.

 * * * 

While the ‘standard preface’ is to give the reader a landscape or CONTEXT that gives a kind of GROUNDING of understanding of where the body of the discussion is ‘coming from’, THIS ESSAY HAS AN EXTRA LEVEL OF PREFACE to guide the reader in THE READER’S APPROACH to INTERPRETING the TEXT, and this is because, as is the basic point that this essay is trying to share, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS commonly use language to CONSTRUCT TWO DIFFERENT REALITIES which I am calling REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum logic reality) … AND… REALITY NUMBER TWO  (binary logic reality).  

These TWO LEVELS of REALITY are explained in the text so this PRE-AMBLE is just a GUIDE to this ‘something different’ than the normal straight-forward publication of an essay.  Since the thesis here is that WE ARE USING, IN AN ALTERNATING FASHION, TWO LEVELS OF REALITY IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUISTIC COMMUNICATIONS in a knee-jerk way where we have FORGOTTEN that we are even doing it. 

BUT NOW IT IS GIVING US PROBLEMS (problems of fragmentation in understanding which is troubling our social relations) and this is CONFUSING US “BECAUSE WE HAVE FORGOTTEN THAT, in our WESTERN CULTURE LANDGUAGE USAGE, WE ARE DOING THIS”.  And here, the “THIS” is referring to our WESTERN CULTURE habitual use of LANGUAGE WHEREIN WE MIX AND MATCH WITHOUT OVERT WARNING, “TWO DIFFERENT REALITIES, REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum logic reality) … AND… REALITY NUMBER TWO  (binary logic reality).  

For example, since we are living in a SPHERICAL SPACE which has a conjugate WAVE-FIELD structure where, for example, the MORE LAND WE CULTIVATE, the LESS WILDERNESS REMAINS so that it is TOO SIMPLE to use the standard BINARY LOGIC description where we use language that promotes the understanding that THERE IS SUCH A THING AS THE “GROWTH” of the area of cultivated land which corresponds, in BINARY LOGIC fashion, with a RELATIVE SHRINKING of WILDERNESS. THIS IS STANDARD FLAT-SPACE “THINKING” put into LANGUAGE and this FLAT-SPACE “THINKING” is the source of BINARY LOGIC.

What is REALLY GOING ON is understood by way of the GESTALT OF OVERALL TRANSFORMATION because THERE IS NO FLAT SPACE wherein the GROWTH of cultivated land implies a “RELATIVE” SHRINKING of WILDERNESS.  That is A TOO SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC BASED WAY OF THINKING THAT WE PUT INTO OUR LANGUAGE-BASED INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUALIZING based “REALITY NUMBER TWO” (binary logic EITHER/OR reality) that is “NOT SUPPORTED BY OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE”.  What “SENSE-EXPERIENCE DOES SUPPORT IS “REALITY NUMBER ONE” (quantum logic BOTH/AND reality).

The REALITY NUMBER ONE is LESS SIMPLE than the REALITY NUMBER TWO in the sense that REALITY NUMBER ONE is the GESTALT based REALITY wherein our UNDERSTANDING includes our (spherical space) SENSING of ‘BALANCE’ and SENSING of ‘CHANGES IN BALANCE’, as in changes in the relative areas of DEVELOPED LANDS and WILDERNESS LANDS.

If we lived in a FLAT PLANE of infinite extent, as our intellectualizing and lingualizing mind is in the habit of thinking, the relation between the area of CULTIVATED LAND and the area of WILDERNESS LAND is BINARY LOGIC based, meaning that that TWO ARE NOT RELATED so that we can MEASURE the AREA of EACH ONE and garner the RETIO based (‘rational’) understanding that comes from this, and in particular this BINARY LOGIC view equips us for talking about the GROWTH of CULTIVATED LAND and/or the SHRINKING of WILDERNESS LAND which is important to the WESTERN CULTURE economics of production.

NOTA BENE:  The changing GESTALT that associates with a relative DECREASE IN WILDERNESS associated with the INCREASE in CULTIVATED AREA within the FINITE space of the surface of a sphere invokes the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM of Modern physics.  We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS tend to HABITUALLY think in terms of FLAT SPACE which is UNREAL ABSTRACTION.  Here we think in the GEOMETRIC terms of a FLAT PLANE OF INFINITE EXTENT.  Unlike SPHERICAL SPACE which is FINITE with a GESTALT quality (it may be ‘mostly wilderness’ with ‘sparse development’ or it may be ‘mostly developed’ with ‘sparse wilderness’.

There is a REAL QUALITY of BALANCE associated with the CHANGING in the relative areas of WILDERNESS and DEVELOPMENT.  Our sense-perception has the capability of perceiving “GESTALT”, an ‘overall impression’ which includes BALANCE and which  GOES BEYOND (is “LESS SIMPLE THAN”) QUANTITATIVE MEASURE.  Our ability to perceive these LESS SIMPLE QUALITATIVE aspects of  “GESTALT” and “BALANCE” or “IMBALANCE” have a QUANTUM LOGIC FOUNDATION that GOES BEYOND THE SCOPE Of BINARY LOGIC.

We could say that BECAUSE GESTALT, BALANCE and IMBALANCE are NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT and deal directly with the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM, they belong in REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum logic reality), … WHICH IS “LESS SIMPLE THAN” (and lies beyond the reach of) … REALITY NUMBER TWO (binary logic reality).  

These CATEGORIES are nothing more or less than the missing labels on the DEA ABSCONDITA, the MISSING FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, which is supporting REALITY NUMBER TWO HAS DROPPED OUT, in going with the one-sided mechanistic MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE ALONE.

IN SHORT, the SPHERICAL SPACE OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE has the property of BALANCE or IMBALANCE and is thus LESS SIMPLE than SIMPLE FLAT SPACE (EUCLIDEAN SPACE) which, being FLAT and INFINITE, does not have the properties of GESTALT and BALANCE and IMBALANCE as available to our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION in the FINITE SPHERICAL SPACE OF WAVE-FIELD REALITY.

While GROWTH based CONCEPTUALIZING is supportable by LOCAL, EXPLICIT MEASUREMENT, there is a changing GESTALT which is QUALITIATIVE in a SPHERICAL SPACE which is WILDERNESS as it becomes INCREASINGLY DEVELOPED.  ‘GROWTH’, since it is CONSTRAINED to BINARY LOGIC, is innately SIMPLER than ‘QUALITATIVE SENSING.

However, in SPHERICAL SPACE THINGS ARE LESS SIMPLE and there arises the GESTALT associated with the BALANCE between WILDERNESS and CULTIVATED LAND.  This BALANCE is a REAL THING and it is QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND relation based as associates with GESTALT, an overall androgynous quality, which derives from LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC and which is not available to SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC.  We could say that BINARY LOGIC is FLAT-SPACE LOGIC where it makes sense to speak in terms of the GROWTH of cultivated land, but GROWTH is a TOO-SIMPLE ABSTRACTION when it comes to the language we need to speak about what is going on with the GESTALT of the ANDROGYNOUS SPHERE which changes with the changing BALANCE of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WILDERNESS LAND and MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CULTIVATED LAND.

Once we shift OUR FOCUS from these TWO THINGS to the ANDROGYNOUS GESTALT, the SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC based RATIO gives way to the LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC BALANCE

THE “TWO REALITIES” REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum logic reality), … WHICH IS “LESS SIMPLE THAN” (and lies beyond the reach of) … REALITY NUMBER TWO (binary logic reality) ARE SHOWING UP IN ASSOCIATION WITH OUR AMBIGUOUS USE OF LOCAL and EXPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING (REALITY NUMBER TWO), .. and NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING (REALITY NUMBER ONE).

For example, when we are using REALITY NUMBER TWO (binary logic reality) we focus on the CULTIVATED AREA in its own right and speak about ‘ITS GROWTH’, … but when we use REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum logic reality), we open our view to the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMATION which is LESS SIMPLE in the sense that BALANCE and IMBALANCE, a JANUS faced (quantum logic) coincidentia oppositorum which HAS NO DEPENDENCY ON LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL OBJECTS, and which becomes the PRIMARY REALITY aka REALITY NUMBER ONE.

In the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT conceptualization of GESTALT mode, we see the CHANGING BALANCE and understanding it in terms of what is REALLY GOING ON because the world of our sense-experience is of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD wherein there is no such thing as an EMPTY FLAT SPACE AREA (no more WAVE-FIELD wherein material things are condensations as in the quantum logic relation) wherein we can purportedly assess whether the CULTIVATED AREA is, this year, EITHER BIGGER OR SMALLER than last year (p.s. ‘don’t mention zee wilderness’).

SURE, WE CAN DO THIS “GROWTH” ASSESSMENT but this measure of GROWTH is a very SIMPLE (binary logic) CONCEPTUALIZATION which is based on intellectual abstraction, … while there is more to dynamics than GROWTH since the GESTALT based “BALANCE” of CULTIVATED LAND and WILDERNESS LAND is something innately LESS SIMPLE (it involves quantum logic which is LESS SIMPLE than binary logic).  Furthermore, it is our INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTING CAPABILITY and NOT our sense-experience THAT IS COMING UP WITH THE BINARY LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZATION.

The “BOTTOM LINE” here is that while our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE simplifies things for us by DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and using ONLY THE ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE in our LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, so that we can SIMPLIFY our CONCEPTUALIZING, such an approach REMOVES the quantum logic sense-experience qualities of GESTALT, BALANCE and IMBALANCE from our LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING CAPABILITY.  In mathematical terms, what we are doing with the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE is DROPPING OUT the ‘IMAGINARY COMPONENT’ of the COMPLEX REALITY and GOING SOLELY WITH THE ‘REAL COMPONENT’ so that we construct our language based conceptualizations  as if within a REALITY NUMBER TWO  (binary logic reality)  rather than constructing our language based conceptualizations within a REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum logic reality).

NOTA BENE:  REALITY NUMBER TWO “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and develops LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS based on BINARY LOGIC as with MATERIAL BEING BASED FORMS AS IF IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, these FORMS being GRAMMAR ENDOWED with notional LOCAL POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENTS.  THIS IS REALITY NUMBER TWO, and it is MISSING the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE which IS comprehended in REALITY NUMBER ONE which is endorsed by MODERN PHYSICS and which is the traditional reality of indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents.

WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are in the confusing situation wherein WE ARE USING, IN AN ALTERNATING FASHION, TWO LEVELS OF REALITY (one LESS SIMPLE and one MORE SIMPLE) IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUISTIC COMMUNICATIONS in a knee-jerk way where we have FORGOTTEN that we are even doing it. 

Kepler pointed this out as did Nietzsche and Bohm.  It started within WESTERN CULTURE SCIENCE which has an early tradition of wanting to construct SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO-REALITIES that have SIMPLER LANGUAGE REQUIREMENTS:

“As regards the academies, they are established in order to regulate the studies of the pupils and are concerned not to have the program of teaching change very often: in such places, because it is a question of the progress of the students, it frequently happens that the things which have to be chosen are not those which are most true but those which are most easy. And by that division in things which makes different people form different judgements, it so happens that certain people are in error contrary to their own opinion.” – Johannes Kepler, ‘Harmonies of the World’

Copernicus was on ‘this same tack’ of SIMPLIFYING the language based conceptualizing, keeping it BINARY LOGIC based rather than having to open the door to linguistic complexities (language capable of quantum logic BOTH/AND propositions).

And just as our Copernicus said to us : It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of astronomy are expressible in a much simpler language ; this one would say: It is more convenient to suppose the earth turns round, since thus the laws of mechanics are expressible in a much simpler language’. Henri Poincaré, ‘Science and Hypothesis’, Ch. VII Relative Motion and Absolute Motion

We may imagine ourselves living in the WESTERN CULTURE WORLD which has LOCKED INTO THE HABIT of using a SIMPLIFIED LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE with a BINARY LOGIC conceptualizing scheme as popularized by NEWTON in regard to PLANETS.

All these things being considered, it seems probable to me, that God in the Beginning form’d matter in solid, massy, hard, impenetrable, moveable Particles, of such Sizes and Figures, and with such other Properties, and in such Proportion to Space, as most conduced to the end for which he form’d them; and these primitive Particles being Solids, are incomparably harder than any porous Bodies compounded of them; even so very hard as never to wear or break in pieces: no ordinary Power being able to divide what God himself made one in the first Creation.”  –Isaac Newton, Opticks: or, A Treatise of the Reflexions, Refractions, Inflexions and Colours of Light

So, while indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta HAVE BEEN NATURALLY ON-BOARD THE REALITY NUMBER ONE, having incorporated it in their language architecture, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have incorporated in our LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, the NUMBER TWO REALITY.

To RESTATE the thesis stated earlier;

… The thesis here is that WE ARE USING, IN AN ALTERNATING FASHION, TWO LEVELS OF REALITY IN OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUISTIC COMMUNICATIONS in a knee-jerk way where we have FORGOTTEN that we are even doing it. 

BUT NOW IT IS INCREASINGLY GIVEN US PROBLEMS (problems of fragmentation in understanding which is troubling our social relations) and this is CONFUSING US “BECAUSE WE HAVE FORGOTTEN THAT, in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE USAGE, “WE” ARE DOING THIS”.  And here, the “THIS” is referring to our WESTERN CULTURE habitual use of LANGUAGE WHEREIN WE MIX AND MATCH WITHOUT OVERT WARNING, “TWO DIFFERENT REALITIES, REALITY NUMBER ONE (quantum reality) … AND… REALITY NUMBER TWO  (binary logic reality).  

While we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, AND ALSO INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS are INTUITIVELY UNDERSTANDING that the continuing GROWTH of CULTIVATING and INDUSTRIALIZING LAND implies the CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE of WILDERNESS LANDS thus TRANSFORMING THE OVERALL GESTALT of the continually transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD, .. our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, HAVING ‘DROPPED OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, “IS SPEAKING IN THE ONE-SIDED OBSCURANTIST TERMS OF MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING …. AS IF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (the primary wave-field agency) DID NOT EXIST.

In other words, as far as our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE goes, it is LEGITIMATE to construct one-sided male-asserting language propositions (i.e. BINARY LOGIC propositions) that speak of the GROWTH of CULTIVATED LAND without ANY MENTION, as would come with QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization, of the REALITY of the CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE OF WILDERNESS LANDS and thus in our WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC reporting mode, there is NO MENTION OF WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON which is TRANSFORMATION of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD THAT WE ALL SHARE INCLUSION IN.

AS FAR AS OUR WESTERN CULTURE (binary logic) LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION OF REALITY goes, we are in REALITY LEVEL TWO (binary logic reality) so that when we are using language to conceptualize *REALITY*, we see ourselves in the BINARY LOGIC, DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based terms of LOCAL AUTHORS of, for example, the GROWTH of CULTIVATED LAND, all of which is ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, wherein we have DROPPED OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE wherein the WILDERNESS is at the same time OPENING UP to ACCOMMODATE/ENABLE (shrinking so as to enable expanding of) the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING.

The WESTERN CULTURE abstract, linguistic DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE that has us WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS pushing forward in a one-sided (SO WE THINK, BECAUSE OF THE WAY WE TALK) MALE ASSERTING/DEVELOPMENT MODE, … AND ALL THE WHILE, WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON IS ANDROGYNOUS “TRANSFORMATION” and this is an ALL INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD TRANSFORMING THAT INCLUDES OURSELVES”.

While Modern physics, indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta adherents ARE ALREADY THERE WITH THIS UNDERSTANDING, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS,  … “WHETHER WE ARE UNDERSTANDING AND BELIEVING IN IT OR NOT” “IS NOT THE POINT” because we have ENGINEERED A LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE WHICH DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE AND DROPS US OUT OF “REALITY NUMBER ONE” down into the simpler, one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY “REALITY NUMBER TWO”.

INTUITIVELY, WE MAY UNDERSTAND THE WORLD IN THE FULL-BLOWN ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD TERMS as affirmed by MODERN PHYSICS and as embraced by indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta, so that when we plough up our field, we are conscious of the CONJUGATE LOSS OF WILDERNESS but there is nothing in our LANGUAGE SUPPORTED REALITY NUMBER TWO that makes mention of the LOSS OF WILDERNESS and the Goedel’s Theorem effect comes in here because whiel we may speak TRUTHFULLY about our GROWING THE SIZE OF OUR CULTIVATED LAND AREA, our statement is BOTH TRUE and INCOMPLETE (dropping out any acknowledgement of the CONJUGATE SHRINKAGE OF WILDERENSS AND THUS THE OVERALL GESTALT OF TRANSFORMATION OF THE LANDSCAPE).

SO, INTUITIVELY WE UNDERSTAND THAT WHAT IS GOING ON IS TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding termed REALITY NUMBER ONE, … but intellectually, in our BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE SUPPORTED CONCEPTUALIZATION MODE, WHAT IS GOING ON IS GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT.   Lao Tzu said something akin to ‘know the local and explicit but embrace the nonlocal and implicit).

 * * *   END OF FIRST LEVEL OF TWO-LEVEL PREFACE * * *

* * * BEGINNING OF PREFACE * * *

The LOCAL and EXPLICIT  … and … the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

Because we live in a WAVE-FIELD wherein everything is in flux, including ourselves; i.e. where we are relational forms in the transforming relational continuum, our VISUAL capability falls innately short of bringing us INCLUSIONAL AWARENESS.

Our visual capability, supported by our two eyes on one side of our head, has given us something our general sensory experience of inclusion in the world, which comes to us as relational understanding which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, brings us a VOYEUR view of world, and this VOYEUR  perspective comes with a SELF-OTHER SPLIT where, while in the VOYEUR MODE, we DROP OUT our sense-experience of INCLUSION in the world we are looking out at.

While the VISION based perspective is LIMITED to a kind of flashlight illumination of the ‘limited patch of reality’ that we can illuminate, that patch is a patch that we can come to know in very fine LOCAL and EXPLICIT detail, in contrast to our overall senses such as our sense of inertia where the accelerations associated with relative motion can bring to our cognitive awareness, an inertial guidance based awareness of our relative movements within a NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT all-including transforming relational continuum aka WAVE-FIELD.

WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, evidently having developed somewhat of an ‘anal-retentive’ tendency, have been SEDUCED by the LOCAL and EXPLICIT nature of our VOYEUR VISUALIZING capability, IN SPITE OF THIS LIMITED SCOPE, and we often DON’T BOTHER to INTEGRATE the LOCAL and EXPLICIT with the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, particularly in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE dialogues where we have fallen into the habit of saying things like ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ and stopping right there as if this FRAGMENT we are SPOTLIGHTING has sufficient ‘stand-alone’ meaning it itself (without mentioning the conjugate shrinking of the wilderness).

This has the effect, in our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, of elevating DIFFERENTIATION which amplifies the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, into an unnatural precedence over INTEGRATION, the latter acknowledging the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT, but WAIT A MINUTE, it is the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE that gives expanded or ‘grounded’ meaning to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT such as the ‘TOWN that is growing’.   The more we put first focus on understanding coming from DIFFERENTIATION that gives LOCAL, EXPLICIT CONTENT, the less that our understanding is INFORMED by the INTEGRATING CONTEXT of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

To say ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ is a QUANTUM LOGIC, NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT formulation UNLIKE ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’ which is a BINARY LOGIC LOCAL and EXPLICIT formulation.

LANGUAGE PRACTICE THAT PUTS LOCAL, EXPLICIT CONTENT INTO AN UNNATURAL PRECEDENCE OVER NONLOCAL, IMPLICIT CONTEXT IS DYSFUNCTIONAL AND IS THE SOURCE OF FRAGMENTATION.

To say that ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, because it DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE while RETAINING THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE ‘ON ITS OWN’, implicitly BACKFILLS the CONCEPTUALIZATION stimulated by this language with ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT, giving us a BINARY LOGIC based CONSTRUCTION wherein there is “EITHER” the TOWN “OR” nothing.  This BINARY LOGIC conceptualization is UNLIKE the QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization wherein ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which has the ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD FORM wherein there is a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING condensation within a FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD.

Our USE, in LANGUAGE, of the LOCAL-and-EXPLICIT and the NONLOCAL-and-IMPLICIT, gives us the means by which our language based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS can either be FULL-BLOWN ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD CONCEPTUALIZATIONS termed here “REALITY NUMBER ONE” or, by way of DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT) and employing ONLY the MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate (which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT), we serve up the simpler BINARY LOGIC BASED ‘”REALITY NUMBER TWO”.

If all of this writing sound UNNECESSARILY COMPLICATED, that may be a fair criticism but the fact remains that our choice of LESS SIMPLE and SIMPLE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURES opens the way to cat and mouse games which employ OBCURANTISM where needed.  If we want to support a social dynamic which celebrates the abstract BINARY LOGIC scheme known as ENTITLEMENT, then we will have to turn our backs on the QUANTUM LOGIC scheme known as BALANCE.

ENTITLEMENT belongs to REALITY NUMBER TWO while BALANCE belongs to REALITY NUMBER ONE.

ENTITLEMENT is supported by the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which implies LOCAL AUTHORING which, although ABSTRACTION, garners support for the concept of ENTITLEMENT.  This all stems from BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION (EITHER he is the AUTHOR OR he is NOT the AUTHOR).  In Modern physics as in QUANTUM LOGIC, we have the ANDROGYNOUS relation involving the CONJUGATION of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING and MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and when we claim that the PUNCH is fully and solely the AUTHOR of the shattered SKULL, using OBSCURANTISM to ‘DROP OUT’ the FEMALE ENABLING CONJUGATE, this puts us in “REALITY NUMBER TWO”.

In order to GET BACK INTO “REALITY NUMBER ONE” and rejoin Modern physics, indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents, from our domicile in “REALITY NUMBER TWO”, we would have to revoke the OBSCURANTISM of the ‘DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODAINT/ENABLING CONJUGATE’ and RESTORE our ACKNOWLEDGING of the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND RELATION which entails restoring the NATURAL PRIMACY of the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT (e.g. RESTORING the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE wherein everything is flux” into precedence over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT “the TOWN is is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”).

By REVISING OUR LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE from the BINARY LOGIC base to the QUANTUM LOGIC base which is what is being described here in terms of RESTORING the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT into natural primacy over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, we are shifting back from REALITY NUMBER TWO to REALITY NUMBER ONE, which is the solution to the many dysfunctions that are manifest in the TRANSFORMING relational continuum while we who share inclusion in it are LINGUISTICALLY MIS-CONCEPTUALYZING IT as REALITY NUMBER TWO rather than REALITY NUMBER ONE..

 * * * * * * * * *

 PARALLEL REALITIES: The GROWTH OF DYSFUNCTION in WESTERN CULTURE

This is an overview of the message shared in prior notes on the topic; The GROWTH OF DYSFUNCTION in WESTERN CULTURE.

We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are using BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION where indigenous aboriginals, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents are using QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZATIONS.

The relationship between less simple QUANTUM LOGIC and simple BINARY LOGIC can be shown using a QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE (indigenous aboriginal language, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta languages) ….  but is BEYOND THE REACH of simple BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE.  Since in WESTERN CULTURE, the simple BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE is the standard for language-based communications, and since it is too simple to carry and share QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualizations, a discussion of the differences in meaning-carrying capability, because it is difficult if not impossible using our Common Average European Language because of its simple, and thus limiting (BINARY LOGIC based) architecture.

For example, in the case of the PUNCH that “IS SAID TO” fracture the SKULL of the recipient, BINARY LOGIC REALITY ‘stops there’ with the one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALZING ACTION, whereas QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY comprehends the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of, for example, the EGG-SHELL thin SKULL.  While the WAVE-FIELD reality we share inclusion has this ANDROGYNOUS (conjugate female accommodating/enabling — male asserting/actualizing) nature, WESTERN CULTURE “COMMON AVERAGE EUROPEAN LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE” employs a SIMPLIFIED structure wherein the simplification comes from DROPPING OUT, in the language based conceptualizing, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE.

This LIMITING in the LANGUAGE-based CONCEPTUALIZING built into the Common Average European LANGUAGE architecture inhibit the communicating of COMPLEX WAVE-FIELD REALITY for experience-sharing purposes. That is, the ARCHITECTURE of language needed to convey the workings of WAVE-FIELD dynamics requires a QUANTUM LOGIC FOUNDATION whereas, the innately simpler BINARY LOGIC FOUNDATION is LIMITED IN ITS CONCEPTUALIZING CAPABILITY to the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING conjugate which “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD conjugate, reducing the WAVE-FIELD dynamic to the SIMPLER  ‘material objects in empty space’ BINARY LOGIC  dynamic.

It is IMPORTANT to understand the difference in REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING COMPLEXITY between simple BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is our WESTERN CULTURE STANDARD, and less simple QUANTUM LOGIC based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is the INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta language  architecture standard AND also the language architecture standard of MODERN PHYSICS.

REALITY NUMBER ONE; QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY:  The less simple QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE employs both the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALYING conjugate as in “THERE is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.  This ANDROGYNOUS relation is one where everything is in flux, or in other words, everything is related (mitakuye oyasin [everything is related].

REALITY NUMBER TWO: BINARY LOGIC REALITY; The simpler BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and GOES ONLY WITH the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE.   In WAVE-FIELD terms which have a COMPLEX REAL + IMAGINARY STRUCTURE, REALITY NUMBER TWO (BINARY LOGIC PSEUDO-REALITY) DROPS OUT THE “IMAGINARY COMPONENT” and develops with LANGUAGE, a simplified BINARY LOGIC based PSEUDO-REALITY which is a CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME based solely on REAL, LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL AGENTS, as if in ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF ININITE EXTENT as in “The TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”.

(more…)

INTRODUCTION: 

Understanding the EAST-WEST PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC SPLIT requires reflection on how it is that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have architected LANGUAGE on a VOYEUR VIEWER BASIS where we SEE THE TOWN GROWING.  It is this VOYEUR VIEW that has us using BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE.   If we are understanding ourselves as INCLUDED IN THE WORLD, our LANGUAGE STRUCTURE shifts and we use non-voyeur lead-off terms like ‘THERE IS”.  In the indigenous aboriginal language, ‘THERE IS” humaning and towning in the ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.  Sentences like this employ the QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM rather than BINARY EITHER/OR LOGIC as in ‘the VOYEUR VIEW OF “THE TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”.

When we use language that casts us as a VOYEUR of the world dynamic, we are PSYCHOLOGICALLY FRAGMENTING REALITY and TAKING OURSELVES OUT OF THE PLACE WE ARE OBSERVING.  This gives us the sense that our own local actions are not tied up within the transforming relational continuum and thus have no bearing on what is happening OUT THERE.  This is the FLAT-SPACE view where we dump our rubbish off the stern of the boat without imagining that we will be later ploughing into it ‘bow-first’.  One might say that language can give us the impression of living in a FLAT SPACE rather than in a SPHERICAL SPACE because in a SPHERICAL SPACE we have the sense of GESTALT wherein ‘everything is related’ as in WAVE-FIELD reality.

What is happening in the UKRAINE and RUSSIA, as seen through WESTERN CULTURE CONDITIONED ‘EYES’ is not seen asdirectly impacting ‘what is going on LOCALLY’, but in a GESTALT sense, as is supported by MODERN PHYSICS, we live within an all-including transforming relational continuum wherein SUBOPTIMIZATION IS IMPOSSIBLE.  Yet in WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENCY, SUBOPTIMIZATION is the PSYCHOLOGICALLY FRAGMENTING NORM wherein, because of the format of our LANGUAGE, it is POPULAR to actually BELIEVE that we can sub-optimize our own ‘NATION’ in spite of the GESTALT impression wherein ‘everything is related’ (mitakuye oyasin).  The sense of FRAGMENTATION is coming from the psycho-linguistic dynamics such as DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE which are supported by WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE with its DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR.

To WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, NOT ONLY DO ‘DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE’ that seem to ‘make sense’ and to support what seems to be a REALITY articulated by DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based ABSTRACTION, but are now ‘using that “REALITY”‘ as the WESTERN CULTURE POPULAR ‘OPERATIVE REALITY’, which is the source of GROWING FRAGMENTATION of WESTERN PSYCHICAL and PHYSICAL ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS. But as the SYSTEMS SCIENCES remind us, as well as MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, such FRAGMENTATION IS NOT REAL (i.e. does not have a SENSE-EXPERIENCE based foundation) and the motions of millions of WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS that affirm abstractions such as INDEPENDENT NATIONS do not MAKE SUCH INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTION ‘REAL’ but merely demonstrate that language-stimulated psychological abstraction is capable of cultivating physical systems of organizing that are ungrounded in sense-experience reality.  The psyche may be convinced of its ability to ‘walk through fire’ or to ‘suboptimize’ and construct a local independent nation that is superior to all other ‘independent nations’  and this ‘suboptimizing game’ may play out for a long while, as it has been playing out among WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS without ever checking out whether ‘DECLARATIONS OF INDEPENDENCE’ had any traction in sense-experience reality beyond the intellectual role-plays they stimulate (since we live in a WAVE-FIELD world wherein everything is related, the DECLARATIONS of INDEPENDENCE can only be a linguistic-intellectual abstraction that stands or falls on the commitment of supporters).

“The above aphorism (The Name of the Devil is Suboptimization’), attributed to Kenneth Boulding, points to the inherent weakness characterizing the mindset and socio‐economic, political, educational and managerial practices of Western Industrial society as it developed over the past 300 years. It has its basis in the analytic‐reductionist scientific paradigm, which, despite the remarkable technological applications it spawned, is inappropriate, conflict‐generating and dysfunctional in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence…”

 — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard  (International Society of Systems Sciences)

SUBOPTIMIZATION is an UNREAL (BINARY LOGIC based) source of psycho-physical FRAGMENTATION infecting WESTERN CULTURE SOCIAL COLLECTIVES, which is important in understanding THE EAST-WEST PSYCHOLOGICAL SPLIT .

* * * end of introduction * * * 

Our use of LANGUAGE ‘CONDITIONS’ the way we THINK about the world.  While we live within a WAVE-FIELD, what we loosely call ‘the WEST’ refers to a LANGUAGE GROUP that has DROPPED OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLLING WAVE_FIELD CONJUGATE from its (our) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE and is using a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING STRUCTURE..   So, for example, the basis WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC of TRANSFORMATION is, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, “FRAGMENTED” by the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and employing a LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which REDUCES REALITY (i.e. reduces language based conceptualization of reality) to the familiar ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY “SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY” where we way things like ‘the TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”.

This WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “DROPS OUT” the female accommodating/enabling WAVE-FIELD FIELD CONJUGATE and ‘goes with’ ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

THIS HAS MAJOR PROBLEMATIC CONSEQUENCES such as, to give one example, the CONSERVATIVE — LIBERAL POLARIZED OPPOSITION.  This coverservative – liberal SPLIT derives from DROPPING OUT, in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, of the FEMALE ACCOMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE which, in the real (beyond language) senes-experience world of inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD, which is comprised of “BOTH” FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE “AND” MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

This “BOTH” / “AND” CONJUGATE RELATION is basic to the WAVE-FIELD DYNAMIC, and it is captures in MODERN PHYSICS, and in indigenous aboriginal languages and in the language architectures of Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, BUT NOT IN WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, because WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE has opted to SIMPLIFY LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and going with a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “ONLY” CONCEPTUALIZATION.

SO, INSTEAD OF THE MODERN PHYSICS and indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta WAVE-FIELD supportive ANDROGYNOUS STRUCTURE in LANGUAGE, the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE “DROPS OUT” the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, leaving WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE WITH ONLY THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE, … hence the FULL WAVE-FIELD LANGUAGE ARTICULATION such as ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE goes ONLY WITH THE ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE of ‘THE TOWN IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services‘ which SAY NOTHING ABOUT THE CONJUGATE SHIRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE THAT IS INCLUDED IN MODERN PHYSICS, indigenous aboriginal, Taoist/Buddhist and Advaita Vedanta languages.

This LINGUISTIC DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE FROM WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES is the source of FRAGMENTATION IN WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE CONDITIONS PSYCHES AND BEHAVIOURS

This SIMPLIFYING, DIMINISHING REDUCTION of the WAVE-FIELD in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, WHICH REDUCES THE CONEPTUALIZATION TO ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY TERMS INFUSES FREAGMENTATION of VARIOUS TYPES into WESTERN CULTURE DISCOURSE and FROM THERE INTO WESTERN CULTURE PSYCHES AND BEHAVIOURS, as has been described By David Bohm under the heading FRAGMENTATION in his ‘Wholeness and the Implicate Order’.

One of the ways in which FRAGMENTATION MANIFESTS as a result of the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE IN LANGUAGE, is in the WESTERN CONSERVATIVE – LIBERAL SPLIT.  This FRAGMENTATION IS DUE TO THE “FIRST MISTAKE” where the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR “CONJURES UP” the notional SPLIT into TWO TYPES OF “LOCAL AUTHORING” (THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS LOCAL AUTHORING IN THE REAL WORLD OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD).

“LOCAL AUTHORING” is the synthetic artifact created with the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which is NOT ONLY A NON-EXISTING LANGUAGE BASED ABSTRACTION but an ABSTRACTION which is SPLIT into a MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING and FEMALE ACOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE FORM.   These TWO INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTIONS are the DEFINING BASIS of the terms of LOCAL AUTHORING termed CONSERVATIVE and LIBERAL where the former (CONSERVATIVE) is IMAGINED to be AUTHORING which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT and described as MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALLIZING actions and developments while the LIBERAL is IMAGINED to be AUTHORING which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as might develop within a social collective while it may MANIFEST through particular individual LIGHTNING RODS is understood as deriving from the social collective.

MEANWHILE, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING”, IT IS THE DOUBLE ERROR OF NAMING AND GRAMMAR as Nietzsche has pointed out, … but we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have the BLINDERS ON and are charging forward with the FALSE and FRAGMENTATIVE UNDERSTANDING that LOCAL AUTHORING is something REAL in a SENSE-EXPERIENCE CONTEXT.  LOCAL AUTHORING IS “NOT REALI”!  IT IS A DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING AND GRAMMAR.

CAN WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS OVERLOOK THE REALITY THAT THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “LOCAL AUTHORING” AND USE “LOCAL AUTHORING” AS THE BASIS FOR THE “CONSERVATIVE” – “LIBERAL” SCHISM?   “YES WE CAN AND WE DO, BECAUSE LANGUAGE IS LIKE THAT; I.E. WE CAN USE LANGUAGE TO CONSTRUCT WHAT WE SHALL “REALITY” AS WE SEE FIT AND IN THE CASE OF WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, we are using the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR to imply “LOCAL AUTHORING” of TWO TYPES, the CONSERVATIVE “LOCAL AUTHORING” which is LOCAL and EXPLICIT in the sense of ORIGINATING IN AN INDIVIDUAL and in terms of MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, … and the LIBIERAL “LOCAL AUTHORING” which is LOCAL and IMPLICIT and manifests through a LIGHTNING ROD who is NOT THE LOCAL ORIGINATING AUTHOR of the action but the CONDUIT to the relation dynamics that brew up within the social collective.

The CONSERVATIVE belief is that the INDIVIDUAL is the PRIMARY AUTHORING SOURCE of actions and development while the LIBEERAL belief is that the SOCIAL COLLECTIVE is the PRIMARY AUTHORING SOURCE which operates through INDIVIDUALS as CONDUITS.  This is why LIBERALS do NOT believe that the JUSTICE SYSTEM should work by simply ATTRIBUTING the INJURIOUS ACTIONS of an individual TO THE INDIVIDUAL; e.g.

“while representing 4.1 percent of the overall Canadian population, Indigenous adults accounted for almost 30 percent of total custodial admissions in 2016-2017 (Statistics Canada 2016a; Statistics Canada, 2017a

In other words, the LIBERAL view is that individuals can be CONDUITS for relational dissonance that brews up within the social collective, without being the LOCAL JUMPSTART AUTHOR of VIOLENT ACTIONS that “APPEAR” to “ORIGINATE” from him but where he is instead a CONDUIT for the release of tensions developing with the relational matrix of the social collective.

(more…)