We live in a WAVE-FIELD WORLD wherein FEMALE ACCOMMODATING-ENABLING opens the way for MALE ASSERTING-ACTUALIZING, and this conjugate combination manifests in our sense-experience as TRANSFORMATION.  HOWEVER< OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, by SUBSTITUTING an ABSTRACT ABSOLUTE EMPTY INFINITE SPACE FOR THE FEMALE WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE , creates CONCEPTUALIZATIONS which DUMB DOWN TRANSFORMATION, which is inherently NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (relational) to LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION , and this WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, in this manner, synthetically LIBERATES MATERIAL FORMS, “LINGUISTICALLY DIFFERENTIATING THEM OUT OF THE TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM”, USING ‘NAMING’ to SET THEM UP ON THEIR OWN” within a notional ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE PSEUDO “CONTAINING SPACE”, enabling these NOW LIBERATED LOCAL, EXPLICIT THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES with notional GRAMMAR-GIVEN POWERS OF LOCAL AUTHORING OF ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT to ‘star’ in PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC “REALITY” CONCEPTUALIZAITON SCHEME.

This just-described ABSTRACT WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE based ARCHITECTING SCHEME is a PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC DEVICE for REDUCING ANDROGYNOUS TRANSFORMATION as is continually transpiring in the all-including WAVE-FIELD, … a REDUCTION that is by way of ‘PSYCHO-LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION’, to one-sided (GRAMMAR-GIVEN) MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING  in the form of LOCAL, EXPLICIT “ACTIONS”, “DEVELOPMENTS” and “PRODUCTION” as if within an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE CONTAINING SPACE. 

This LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION in the form of a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, once it occupies the mind, at the same time “OBSCURES” the less-simple WAVE-FIELD REALITY due to our preoccupation with using LANGUAGE TO IMPLANT INTO THE PSYCHE a notional ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING, SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE REALITY. 

This INTELLECTUAL TOOL of CONSTRUCTING “DUMBED DOWN” LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATIONS is a WESTERN CULTURE psychological preoccupation that FORCES us to DROP OUT OUR COGNITIVE GRASP OF THE FULL WAVE-FIELD nature of our sense-experience of inclusion in the transforming relational continuum (aka our inclusion in the WAVE-FIELD).   THAT IS, WE DROP OUT OUR COGNITIVE GRASP OF WAVE-FIELD DYNAMICS by DROPPING OUT OF OUR LANGUAGE, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.  This DROPPING OUT leaves in its wake, a “DUMBED DOWN” ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING-ONLY ‘DIFFERENTIATING’ mechanism whose DIFFENTIATED LINGUISTIC  CONCEPTUALIZATIONS are hijacking the FOUNDATIONAL ROLE in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE-BASED “OPERATIVE REALITY” CONCEPTUALIZATION.

INSTEAD OF QUANTUM LOGIC TRANSFORMATION consistent with our SENSE-EXPERIENCE of INCLUSION in an ALL-INCLUDING, INNATELY INTEGRATED, TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL (WAVE-FIELD CONTINUUM), WE WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS EMPLOY A LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE based on BINARY LOGIC DIFFERENTIATION.  Thus, while our sense-experience is of inclusion in an all-including relational transformation, our WESTERN CULTURE linguistic conceptualizations has us ‘speaking’ in terms of DIFFERENTIATED FRAGMENTS,  Thus, for example, while our sense-experience informs us of our INTEGRATED living within a TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE uses DIFFERENTIATION to present LANGUAGE BASED FRAGMENTATION featuring INDEPENDENT LOCAL EXPLICIT BEINGS that live in INDEPENDENT LOCAL EXPLICIT TOWNS in INDEPENDENT LOCAL  EXPLICIT NATIONS. While the WESTERN CULTURE DIFFERENTIATION SCHEME  supports a COMMON VOCABULARY using terms implying MATERIAL BEINGS IN EMPTY SPACE such as TOWNS, and HUMANS etc., it lacks the capabilities of other INTEGRATION based languages such as indigenous aboriginal languages, wherein one speaks in terms that incorporate INNATE INTEGRATION; e.g. “there is TOWNING and HUMANING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, which supports understanding in the QUANTUM LOGIC sense of CONDENSATIONS in the all-including WAVE-FIELD where INTEGRATION is INNATE, where DIFFERENTIATION “MAKES NO SENSE” since “EVERYTHING IS RELATED” (mitakuye oyasin).

 * * * 

There is an exposure (like a crippling virus introduced into the innocent youthful WESTERN CULTURE mind) in ‘school based learning’ in that, as trusting children, we may assimilate many understandings, and use them in shaping everyday behaviours that are innately ERRONEOUS (dysfunctional).   An EVEN GREATER EXPOSURE is where we are taught to use a TOO SIMPLE LANGUAGE whereby we are conveying an unrealistically SIMPLIFIED understanding which we are nevertheless OPERATIONALIZING as if the SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO-REALITIES conveyed by the TOO-SIMPLE LINGUISTIC REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION were qualified for service as THE OPERATIVE REALITY.   We fall into this trap when we use BINARY LOGIC based language that DIFFERENTIATES rather than using QUANTUM LOGIC that INTEGRATES, is the focus of this essay.

This is the current plight of WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE USERS as has been pointed out by Nietzsche and Bohm wherein the popular WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE employs a BINARY LOGIC ARCHITECTURE which supports INTELLECTUAL CONCEPTUALIZATION in the form of a SIMPLIFIED DIFFERENTIATION BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY which MISINFORMS US and induces in us BEHAVIOURS that are responding to what we think is ‘REALITY’ which is NOT OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, but is instead, an INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACT LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION-based PSEUDO-REALITY CONSTRUCTION that we have grown COMFORTABLE with because ‘ALMOST EVERYONE IS TRUSTING IN IT AND USING IT AS THE OPERATIVE REALITY.

So, for example, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS use LANGUAGE that DUMBS DOWN ‘TRANSFORMATION’ to GROWTH.  In our society, almost everyone is using language constructs made with the simplified BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE system where one says things like ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.   When statements like this are articulated, as they are in WESTERN CULTURE LANGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, our IMAGINATION kicks in and we can ‘see’ in our ‘mind’s eye’, the PICTURE of a notional THING-IN-ITSELF suggested by this NAME, ‘THE TOWN’ and we can further ‘see’ in our ‘mind’s eye’, the PICTURE of a notional EMPTY SURROUNDING, CONTAINING SPACE which we use to accommodate the GRAMMAR given abstraction of the GROWTH of the TOWN.  In other words, we may think of a large grassy field as the CONTAINER for the GROWING TOWN, anything will do, really, like a blank page on a sketch pad, the sketch pad of our PSCYCHE as we stimulate IMAGINATION with the words ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services’.

The MENTAL PICTURE HERE is what Nietzsche describes as the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR where we USE ‘NAMING’ to CREATE a NOTIONAL LOCAL THING-IN-ITSELF and conflate this with GRAMMAR to engineer, with our NAMING and GRAMMAR, a PSEUDO-REALITY based on a NAMING-instantiated LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL THING-IN-ISELF that we use GRAMMAR to impute to it, its own LANGUAGE-based (PSEUDO) POWERS OF GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT and PRODUCTION of goods and services.  This has a BINARY LOGIC STRUCTURE wherein we imagine the NAMING-instantiated ‘TOWN’ as something INNATELY SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT of the ‘TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ that we are using language to craft as an EMPTY, PASSIVE CONTAINER to give the ACTIVE MATERIAL ENTITY, “THE TOWN”,  A PASSIVE CONTAINING SPACE, in which we can IMAGINE ‘THE TOWN GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING products and services in’.

The PASSIVITY (ABSOLUTE EMPTINESS BASED PASSIVITY) of what in ‘real life sense-experience’ would be the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE that comes together with the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE becomes the DEA ABSCONDITA as far are our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTING SCHEME is concerned, because our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ACHITECTING SCHEME SIMPLY “DROPS OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE’ and substitutes an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

Once we, as children, learn to speak this one-sided MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY (SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONSTRUCTING) LANGUAGE, the reality we are ‘talking about’ is no longer consistent with our ‘sense-experience reality’.

“Toto, I’ve a feeling we’re not in Kansas any more’!”

The WAVE-FIELD that our SENSE-EXPERIENCE is continually informing us of our inclusion in, … is nothing like the ONE-SIDED MALE-ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING LINGUISTIC CONSTRUCTION that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have become accustomed to THINKING OF AND TALKING ABOUT as THE REAL WORLD, and here I shall DROP OUT the extension “OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE’ but this one-sided MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY LANGUAGE BASED ABSTRACT SUBSTITUTE REALITY CONCEPTUALIZATION is “NOTHING LIKE “OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY”.   For one thing, there is no such thing as “A TOWN THAT IS GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services”, there is only, in our real-life SENSE-EXPERIENCING, “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE” which is describing the QUANTUM LOGIC (BOTH/AND) WAVE-FIELD) STRUCTURE wherein MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD.   Note that THERE IS NO “EMPTY SPACE” in this language-based picture because MATERIAL FORMS are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED WAVE-FIELD, and this ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED WAVE-FIELD AKA ‘THE PLENUM’ ‘TAKES OVER’ FROM WHAT, IN WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE BASED REALITY ARCHIECTURE, CONTINUES TO BE CAST AS “ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT”, … A NOTIONAL (LANGUISTIC ABSTRACTION BASED) ‘EMPTY CONTAINER’ DESIGNED TO SET UP A CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME FEATURING AN EMPTY CONTAINING SPACE WHEREIN ‘INDEPENDENT MATERIAL ENTITIES’ MOVE ABOUT AND INTERACTION WITHOUT ANY INVOLVEMENT OF THE ‘CONTAINER’, AS CREATES THE SIMPLIFICATION WE KNOW AS ‘BINARY LOGIC’, A SIMPLIFICATION AS FAR AS LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING GOES, WHICH ‘WORKS’ BY CONSTRUCTING A ‘SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO-REALITY’ BASED ON INDEPENDENT MATERIAL FORMS IN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

This abstract pseudo-reality construction is what merits the response “Toto, I’ve a feeling we’re not in Kansas any more’!”

But, as infants learning the WESTERN CULTURE SYSTEM OF LANGUAGE, we not only do not have an independent means of ‘checking out the integrity of the language architecture which is being loaded into us’ (picture the geese being used as vehicles for producing ‘foie gras’ where the input is ratcheted into us, bypassing our natural mechanisms for assessment and discriminating acceptance or rejection.   We WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are PRIMED with our BINARY LOGIC UNDERSTANDING of (what is in fact a SIMPLIFIED SUBSTITUTE) QUOTE/UNQUOTE “REALITY”.

ONCE the FOIE GRAS APPARATUS HAS US PRIMED WITH WESTERN CULTURE BINARY LOGIC FOUNDATIONAL THINKING, it becomes a case of “If one’s only tool is a (BINARY LOGIC) hammer, everything looks like a nail), … thus, for example, the TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (this is the QUANTUM LOGIC expression of such WAVE-FIELD PHENOMENA), in the ‘foie gras’ conditioned WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENT mind with its ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE, is going to LINGUISTICALLY DUMB DOWN the WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE, to the SIMPLIFIED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY SUBSTITUTE REALITY.

YES, THIS SIMPLIFIED COMMUNICATING SCHEME ‘WORKS’ as far are putting the LANGUAGE USER GROUP ‘ON THE SAME PAGE’, but just what kind of ‘SAME PAGE’ is that?   As just pointed out, it is a SIMPLIFIED PSEUDO-REALITY PAGE which DUMBS DOWN the WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE STRUCTURE by DROPPING OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE and PRETENDING THAT THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE “IS ALL THERE IS” and in place of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE, all that remains is an ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE, which the language-trained PSYCHE has to ‘get used to’ by reminding the PSYCHE to say ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ which DROPS OUT THE CONJUGATE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING ‘SHRINKING OF THE WILDERNESS’, to exploit the SIMPLIFICATION that comes with such DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

While our SENSE-EXPERIENCE continues to inform us in a full WAVE-FIELD manner, our INTELLECTUAL LANGUAGE-BASED BANTER is constructing SUBSTITUTE REALITIES wherein there is NO SIGN OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJGUATE.  DID YOU SEE HOW THAT EGG-SHELL SKULL RESPONDED TO THE PUNCH, as if it was WAITING TO ACCOMMODATE and ENABLE the PUNCH by ALMOST ANTICIPATORY CRUMBLING INTO FRAGMENTS however FEEBLE the FORCE OF THE PUNCH?  REGARDLESS, LET’S NOT FORGET that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have agreed to ARCHITECT OUR LANGUAGE so as to LIMIT ACTIONS to ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ACTIONS as if the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE DID NOT EXIST, which makes LANGUAGE much SIMPLER, … of course, at the same time reducing the LANGUAGE CAPTURE from that of capturing WAVE-FIELD phenomena to capturing only MATERIAL BEING based LOCAL ACTIONS WITH LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION or INTELLECTUAL LANGUAGE-STIMULATED CONCEPTUALIZATIONS wherein we DROP OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE.

NOTA BENE: By continually using the SIMPLIFIED BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE we progressively CONSTRUCT and DEVELOP a notional LOCAL EXPLICIT ‘PRESENCE’ such as ‘THE TOWN’ and we load it up with LOCAL, EXPLICIT MATERIAL FORMS that we can recover with LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION which we come to know and use in our language so that we can come to understand ‘the TOWN’ by way of DIFFERENTIATION of ITS LOCAL EXPLICIT MATERIAL PARTS.   This is NOT the same WORLD as the world of MODERN PHYSICS, INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, TAOISTS/BUDDHISTS and ADVAITA VEDANTA ADHERENTS which is an INTEGRATION based world which DOES NOT BREAK DOWN, by way of DIFFERENTIATION, INTO LOCAL EXPLICIT PARTS but which we come to know and use language to depict in RELATIONAL TERMS that support INTEGRATION as with ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.   

 

To understand the world by way of QUANTUM BOTH/AND LOGIC wherein we understand TOWNING as a DYNAMIC RELATIONAL INCLUSION “WITHIN” the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM serves up a VERY DIFFERENT WORLD than the one we put together with BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE which uses DIFFERENTIATION to establish SEPEARATE IDENTITIES for notional LOCAL, EXPLICIT, INDEPENDENT FIGURES that move about and interact within a notional ABSOLUTE, EMPTY and INFINITE ‘CONTAINING SPACE’.

 

* * * THE KEY POINT I WISH TO MAKE HERE IS “NOT ONLY” DO WE HAVE TWO VERY DIFFERENT LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE SCHEMES FOR CONVEYING ‘REALITY’, THE ‘MODERN PHYSICS’ and INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL SCHEME WHICH IS INTEGRATION BASED (e.g. ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’), … AND ANOTHER ‘NEWTONIAN’ SCHEME WHICH IS, … DIFFERENTIATION BASED, we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have, over time, constructed a COMPREHENSIVE BINARY LOGIC BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION which is now FAMILIAR TO THE MANY USERS OF THE LANGUAGE.  BECAUSE OUR WESTERN CULTURL ANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE IS ‘DIFFERENTIATION’ based, we “KNOW” THIS WESTERN CULTURE VERSION OF ‘REALITY’ by understanding it as being comprised by NUMEROUS LOCAL, EXPLICIT INDEPENDENT MATERIAL COMPONENTS such as TOWNS, and BUILDINGS and STREETS and AVENUES, which work together to convey the TOWN by way of the ASSEMBLING of these DIFFERENTIATION based FRAGMENTS.

BUT DIFFERENTIATION IS NOT THE ONLY WAY OF ‘KNOWING’ THE PLACE, there is also, and this accords with Modern physics, Indigenous aboriginal culture, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta, “INTEGRATION” which is the WAVE-FIELD way of understanding.

NOTICE THAT the DIFFERENTIATION approach employs FRAGMENTATION of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM in which case the DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE STARTS OFF BY BREAKING THINGS DOWN INTO LOCAL, EXPLICIT, INDEPENDENT, SEPARATE PARTS, provoking critiques (within the story-telling-context) such as the following by CHARLES DICKENS;

 

How does this LANGUAGE GAME work where we mention the name of ONE MAN as the BUILDER of the HOUSING PROJECT? How does this fit in with the overall transforming relational continuum wherein there is the gathering and scattering of a diversity of participants, which is a very NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT dynamic, the dynamic of the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM?  Here is where RELATIONAL CONTEXT is most surely in primacy over the LOCAL CONTENT, as far as our real-life sense-experience would have it, … but our ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is DEFINITELY NOT A FAN of the WAVE-FIELD UNDERSTANDING OF REALITY.  OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE SYSTEM HAS THIS BUILT IN SIMPLIFYING DROP OUT OF THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE.

This is what Charles Dickens is pointing out in ‘Hard Times’ in the sequence where ‘Sissy Jupe’s romantic relational CONTEXTUAL understanding of a horse is ‘put down’ by her teacher Thomas Gradgrind who insists on grounding all understanding in ‘being’-based ‘factual CONTENT’ as is the way of WESTERN CULTURE mainstream ‘science’ (prior to Modern physics);

“Now, what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else, and root out everything else. You can only form the minds of reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of any service to them. This is the principle on which I bring up my own children, and this is the principle on which I bring up these children. Stick to Facts, sir!”

‘Bitzer,’ said Thomas Gradgrind. ‘Your definition of a horse.’

‘Quadruped. Graminivorous. Forty teeth, namely twenty-four grinders, four eye-teeth, and twelve incisive. Sheds coat in the spring; in marshy countries, sheds hoofs, too. Hoofs hard, but requiring to be shod with iron. Age known by marks in mouth.’ Thus (and much more) Bitzer.

— Charles Dickens, ‘Hard Times’

 

What we are ‘looking at here’ is a critique of the popular WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC OPERATION of DIFFERENTIATION which leads to FRAGMENTATION.

NOTE THAT OUR CHOICE OF DIFFERENTIATION removes the OPTION of INTEGRATION since once we say that ‘the TOWN IS GROWING’ (this is DIFFERENTIATION), we are applying the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR which imputes the POWER of LOCAL AUTHORING of actions and developments to the NAMING instantiated SUBJECT which FRAGMENTS our CONCEPTUALIZATION of ‘REALITY’.  The LANGUAGE;  ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, because it is a BINARY LOGIC CONSTRUCTION, is SIMPLER than the corresponding QUANTUM LOGIC CONSTRUCTION; ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ (because the BINARY LOGIC version LIMITS the CONCEPTUALIZATION to a ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE and DROPS OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE).   By CONTRAST, were we to go with QUANTUM LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, we would capture the full ANDROGYNOUS WAVE-FIELD STRUCTURE consisting of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING IN CONJUGATE RELATION WITH THE MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC. 

The POINT that NEEDS TO ‘COME THROUGH’ HERE is that in these LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE VARIANTS (the one-sided BINARY LOGIC MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY) LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZATION, … vis a vis the ANDROGYNOUS QUANTUM LOGIC FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING — MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING DYNAMIC, is also known in mathematics in terms of the “REAL” and “IMAGINARY” COMPONENTS of the COMPLEX SIGNAL (the WAVE-FIELD).

WHAT “CHARLES DICKENS” is, in effect, ‘COMPLAINING ABOUT’ in his mocking of the teaching approach of Thomas Gradgrind, is the SHUTTING DOWN of LANGUAGE BASED WAVE-FIELD CONCEPTUALIZATION by way of DROPPING OUT of the LANGUAGE STREAM, the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, a TREND that was BUILDING in DICKENS’ ERA.

 

WHAT IS GOING ON HERE IS, in the WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTING TREND, the DROPPING OUT of the PRIMARY ROLE OF ‘INTEGRATION” as the basis of LANGUAGE and the DUMBING DOWN OF THE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE BASE, TO DIFFERENTIATION, so that INSTEAD OF THE INTEGRATION based FOUNDATION of ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, THE WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE SHIFTS TO A DIFFERENTIATION based CONCEPTUALIZATION MODE which employs the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR; e.g. ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which is ‘backed up’ with DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE where we specify (NAME) BUILIDINGS, STREETS, AVENUES, PARKS, FREEWAYS, CHURCHES,  putting together a NAMING and GRAMMAR based NARRATIVE which is DIFFERENTIATION based.

THERE IS NO WAY THAT A LANGUAGE BASED ON ‘DIFFERENTIATION’ CAN CAPTURE ‘the TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM’ aka the WAVE-FIELD, but what a DIFFERENTIATION based LANGUAGE CAN DO is SCREW THINGS UP by way of IMPOSING DIFFERENTIATION based FRAGMENTATION, as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING goods and services).  WHAT HAPPENS HERE IS THAT WE DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE THAT SUPPORTS INTEGRATION, and without INTEGRATION, we don’t have LANGUAGE capable of TRANSFORMATION as in ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE.    WITHOUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE AND PROCEEDING WITH ONLY THE ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING CONJUGATE, we are DUMBING DOWN the WAVE-FIELD to a SIMPLE CONCEPTUALIZATION IN TERMS OF THE ACTIONS AND INTERACTIONS of notional LOCAL, EXPLICIT, MATERIAL THINGS-IN-THEMSELVES, AS IF IN AN ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE.

WHERE ARE WE TODAY?

As Ivan Illich pointed out in Silence is a Commons, … the coming of the LOUDSPEAKER followed by the massive roll-out of electronic communications networking has OBSCURED our access to an ordinary people based social network of sense-experience sharing, and has us thinking (believing) that the popular language based substitute reality constructions are viable candidates for directing our social-relational actions.

THIS IS A MISTAKE!  THE REALITY WE POPULARLY TALK ABOUT AS ‘REALITY’ IS “NOT REALITY”, as is pointed out in the -8- “LIES MY TEACHER TOLD ME” posted further on in this essay.

Bohm points out in his discussion on FRAGMENTATION that our WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION based FRAGMENTATION is the source of progressive SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA in our society.

We INTUITIVELY know that we are using BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE that gives the psychological impression of DIFFERENTIATION where we speak about the GROWTH of TOWNS without mentioning the conjugate SHRINKING OF WILDERNESS, the latter acknowledging the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING of the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE that makes possible the MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING “GROWTH OF THE TOWNS”.

WHAT IS HARD FOR US WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS TO COMPREHEND is that we have used a TOO SIMPLE LANGUAGE to construct a TOO-SIMPLE LANGUAGE-based WORLDVIEW which is FRAGMENTED and otherwise DISTORTED, but we continue to use the same DUMBED DOWN BINARY LOGIC LANGUAGE that continues to support the FRAGMENTED SUBSTITUTE REALITY that we are continuing to use as our OPERATIVE REALITY.

This focus on BINARY LOGIC is an example of WESTERN CULTURE THOUGHT and LANGUAGE and it is not the ONLY possible LANGUAGE BASED CONCEPTUALIZING SCHEME.  As has been pointed out, Modern physics, along with indigenous aboriginal cultures, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents MAKE USE OF A DIFFERENT FORM OF LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZATION which is QUANTUM LOGIC based and thus WAVE-FIELD compliant.

 

 * * * This is the end of the ‘PREAMBLE’ to REMEMBERING “The Lies my Teacher Taught me”? * * * 

 

(more…)