Archive for May 5, 2023
An EAST/WEST Understanding of How SENSE-EXPERIENCE Informs LANGUAGE and THOUGHT
0“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum, and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.” — David Bohm
We live “in a world characterized by global interconnectedness and mutual interdependence …” — György Jaros and Martine Dodds-Taljaard (International Society of Systems Sciences)
“Imagine there’s no countries It isn’t hard to do” , John Lennon, ‘IMAGINE’
* * *
The EARLIER TITLES used for this same subject matter such as “THE HUMONGOUS LIE OF ‘LOCAL AUTHORING’, and the title INTEGRATION and DIFFERENTIATION”, continue to ‘apply’, but in this current note, the ‘exploration’ delves deeper into the EAST/WEST split, hence the title An EAST/WEST Understanding of How SENSE-EXPERIENCE Informs LANGUAGE and THOUGHT
SIMPLY STATED: INDIGENOUS ABORIGINALS, Taoists/Buddhists and Advaita Vedanta adherents have opted for QUANTUM LOGIC based INTEGRATION in THOUGHT and LANGUAGE, CONSISTENT WITH SENSE-EXPERIENCE (wherein material forms are CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD which gives the BOTH/AND relation wherein the MATERIAL FORM is BOTH ITSELF and at the same time, the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD IT IS A CONDENSATION IN.
WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS, by having opted for BINARY LOGIC based DIFFERENTIATION in THOUGHT and LANGUAGE which is ‘EXPLICIT’ and FRAGMENTATIVE in an EITHER/OR sense, CONFLICTS with our QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE-EXPERIENCE as CONDENSATIONS in the all-including WAVE-FIELD; i.e. ‘CONDENSATIONS’ which are BOTH OURSELVES AND the WAVE-FIELD we are CONDENSATIONS in.
WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE, by giving a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE TO BINARY LOGIC based DIFFERENTIATION as with DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based LOCAL AUTHORING (e.g. the TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING, and PRODUCING goods and services), … IS DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING/ENABLING CONJUGATE (i.e. DROPPING OUT the sense-experience affirmed understanding that the LANDSCAPE IS TRANSFORMING) and thus FALSELY conceptualizing DYNAMICS in reduced (OBSCURANTIST) ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING/ACTUALIZING ONLY TERMS.
* * *
Since ‘this’ is a LANGUAGE-BASED attempt to share understanding as to how SENSE-EXPERIENCE informs LANGUAGE and THOUGHT, it is subject to the LIMITATIONS OF THIS LANGUAGE I AM USING, however, it is nevertheless possible to use a limited capability language to discuss the limitations. For example, I can use references to SENSE-EXPERIENCE which is BEYOND CAPTURE IN LANGUAGE as a means of communication and sharing complex understanding. For example, hand based symbols can trigger understanding of sexual relations which, themselves, are well beyond capture in LANGUAGE.
In other words, THOUGHT of SENSE-EXPERIENCE can be TRIGGERED by LANGUAGE as a means of communication. In this case we do NOT use language to actually ‘share an experience’, we use language to trigger remembrance of SENSE-EXPERIENCE that is far too complex to capture in language. This is the ‘wink-wink, nudge-nudge, say-no-more’ (Monty Python) allusion to how understanding of complex sense-experience can be (crudely) shared by using combinations of gestures and words.
In this note entitled An EAST/WEST Understanding of How SENSE-EXPERIENCE informs LANGUAGE and THOUGHT, the aim is to show how MODERN PHYSICS and INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL (EASTERN) LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, being QUANTUM LOGIC based us LESS SIMPLE and more deeply informative than WESTERN CULTURE Common Average European LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE which is SIMPLER by being BINARY LOGIC based. While QUANTUM LOGIC language is WAVE-FIELD expression capable, BINARY LOGIC language is only MATERIAL DYNAMICS capable.
QUANTUM LOGIC is the logic associated with a world comprised of an ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD within which material forms are CONDENSATIONS so that visible/tangible material forms, instead of being ‘separate and independent’ as in BINARY LOGIC, are instead included and interdependent within the context of an overall, all-including energy-charged PLENUM or WAVE-FIELD.
In the QUANTUM LOGIC understanding, the only possible dynamic is TRANSFORMATION and MOTION is IMPOSSIBLE (motion is an abstract concept based on the BINARY LOGIC, MUTUALLY EXCLUDING ‘EXISTENCE’ of MATTER and SPACE. This BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION is “SIMPLER” than the “QUANTUM LOGIC” relation wherein the universe is an energy-filled PLENUM which includes energy-based CONDENSATIONS where the relationship with the PLENUM is a BOTH/AND relation; i.e. where the CONDENSATION which we ‘see’ as a material form, is an INCLUDED ASPECT of the ONE, OVERALL, ALL-INCLUDING PLENUM. In this case, where we see what we might mistakenly refer to as MOTION, what we are seeing is TRANSFORMATION.
Most Recent Comments