QUANTUM LOGIC (i.e. NON-BINARY LOGIC where FIGURE and GROUND are ONE as with CONDENSATION) …  is in a NATURAL PRIMACY over BINARY LOGIC (where FIGURE and GROUND are TWO as with MATTER and EMPTY SPACE).  We have a CHOICE of which to give the foundational role to, and the choice we make has a profound impact on the UNDERSTANDING of the world that we draw from our language-based CONCEPTUALIZING of our SENSE-EXPERIENCING of the world, a world-in-flux wherein the NONLOCAL AND IMPLICIT is in a NATURAL PRECEDENCE over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.   This is the finding of MODERN PHYSICS wherein material forms (the local and explicit) are CONDENSATIONS of the ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD (the nonlocal and implicit).

BINARY LOGIC , where FIGURE and GROUND are TWO, … while simpler, is intellectual abstraction for which there is no equivalent in our natural SENSE-EXPERIENCE world wherein FIGURE and GROUND are only ONE. 

That is, when we use the simplifying abstraction of BINARY LOGIC in our LANGUAGE based CONCEPTUALIZING, we are IMPOSING this SIMPLIFYING CONCEPTUALIZATION by using LANGUAGE to ‘CONSTRUCT’ impressions of a simplified BINARY LOGIC based PSEUDO-WORLD.  These BINARY LOGIC based simplified CONCEPTUALIZATIONS …. ARE NOT “REPRESENTATIONS” of something that ‘exists out there’, but are instead INTELLECTUAL ABSTRACTIONS ‘in here’ that construct a simplified SUBSTITUTE pseudo-world OUT THERE.

Indigenous aboriginal LANGUAGES employ this RELATION wherein the LOCAL and EXPLICIT is INCLUDED in the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’, implying a QUANTUM LOGIC relation; i.e. the BOTH/AND LOGIC of the INCLUDING MEDIUM as is the relation between the ALL-INCLUDING ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD and the MATERIAL FORM that is the CONDENSATION of the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD.

The CONDENSATION is at the same time “BOTH” the MATERIAL FORM “AND” the INCLUDING MEDIUM (the ENERGY-CHARGED PLENUM aka the WAVE-FIELD) so that UNLIKE THE BINARY LOGIC based CONCEPTUALIZATION where the MATERIAL FORM ‘moves through’ an EMPTY SPACE, … HERE WE HAVE THE QUANTUM LOGIC SITUATION where THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS “THINGS THAT MOVE” as where MOVING FIGURE and STATIONARY GROUND are TWO SEPARATE THINGS, there is only TRANSFORMATION where THERE IS ONLY the “APPEARANCE” of a MOVING FIGURE that is associated with the OVERALL TRANSFORMATION which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT.

Or in other words, “THE MOVING/CHANGING FIGURE, BE IT A TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING OR A HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING, IS ONLY ‘APPEARANCE’ whereas overall TRANSFORMATION is the REALITY.

TRANSFORMATION, as CONCEPTUALIZED using the BOTH/AND QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC conveying of SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, IS LESS SIMPLE than than the “EITHER/OR BINARY LOGIC matter and space LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING of SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY”,  in that the QUANTUM LOGIC LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING is fully FLUID as in NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (ACTION-VERB-based) WITHOUT DEPENDENCY ON THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT (i.e. without NAMED-BEING-BASED DEPENDENCY).  i

THERE IS A PROBLEM in WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING IN THAT PRIORITY IS GIVEN TO THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING which is BINARY LOGIC based and ONCE THE CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATION IS LAID DOWN WITH BINARY LOGIC which is SIMPLER than QUANTUM LOGIC, it is NOT POSSIBLE to incorporate, on that SIMPLE LOCAL and EXPLICIT base, the QUANTUM LOGIC CONSISTENT NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZATION.

In other words, after we have used language to impute LOCAL AUTHORING POWERS TO THINGS as if in an EMPTY SPACE (BINARY LOGIC) in our LOCAL AND EXPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZATION, we cannot mix and match language that imputes BOTH/AND STATUS to MATERIAL FORMS BECAUSE IN THIS CASE AUTHORING AGENCY IS NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (as in overall TRANSFORMATION).

BINARY LOGIC is like the Cuckoo, a simple bird that takes over the nest of less simple birds in that its eggs hatch first and the Cuckoo chicks push out the less simple birds eggs before they hatch, so that the simple supersedes the less simple.

In other words, once BINARY LOGIC is infused in the CONCEPTUALIZING STREAM, it TAKES OVER.  If we start off saying ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, we have established the MORE SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC MODE OF CONCEPTUALIZING (which implies :LOCAL AUTHORING, implying an ABSOLUTE EMPTY SPACE CONTAINER) and our continuing story is then in terms of THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT which BLOCKS THE ENTRANCE of the QUANTUM LOGIC CONCEPTUALIZING which is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as in ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ , … where there is NO SENSE OF LOCAL AUTHORING as “the TOWNING is INCLUDED WITHIN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE in a BOTH/AND SENSE;” i.e. the TOWNING is to the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE as the WHORLING is to the FLOWING in a FLUID DYNAMIC (Figure and Ground are ONLY ONE).  

As in the Cuckoo’s egg hatching metaphor, once the starting out of a linguistic exchange commences on the basis of BINARY LOGIC conceptualization, the less simple QUANTUM LOGIC conceptualization is shut out.

The use of simple BINARY LOGIC in LANGUAGE is OBSCURANTIST in that its LOCAL and EXPLICIT configuration BLOCKS THE  EXPRESSION OF the less-simple NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT (as where everything is in flux and THER IS NO LOCAL AUTHORING) which is PRIMARY in SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY.  That is, if we use BINARY LOGIC and say “THE TOWN IS GROWING” we have assigned the AUTHORING POWER to the TOWN for its own GROWTH and this “LOCAL AUTHORING” is innately SIMPLER that if we had said ‘There is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which gives the AUTHORING POWER to the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE (i.e. to the WAVE-FIELD rather than than to the material CONDENSATION in the WAVE-FIELD).

This is the REDUCTION of QUANTUM LOGIC to BINARY LOGIC that changes LANGUAGE-BASED-UNDERSTANDING in a manner that is a CULTURE SHIFTER since it applies not only to ‘the TOWN’ but to ‘the HUMAN’ and while indigenous aboriginal culture LANGUAGE speaks in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms of HUMANING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, Common Average European LANGUAGE speaks in the BINARY LOGIC terms of HUMANS as LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEINGS with “THEIR OWN (grammar-given) POWERS OF AUTHORING ACTIONS AND DEVELOPMENT.

WESTERN CULTURE, because of the popular use of BINARY LOGIC based LANGUAGE, persists in the use of LANGUAGE that is OBSCURANTIST, reducing the NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING which in our SENSE-EXPERIENCE is in an INNATE PRIMACY over the LOCAL and EXPLICIT, to the LOCAL and EXPLICIT.  The NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT CONCEPTUALIZING requires QUANTUM LOGIC as in the languages of Modern physics, Indigenous aboriginals, Taoism/Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta.

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE is putting SIMPLE BINARY LOGIC into an unnatural primacy over LESS SIMPLE QUANTUM LOGIC with the result that LINGUISTIC CONCEPTUALIZING, instead of being based in NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT TRANSFORMATION, is based in LOCAL and EXPLICIT MATERIAL BEING sourced ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS.  The result is that WESTERN CULTURE LINGUISTIC REALITY CONCEPTUALIZING, by virtue of giving the foundational role in LANGUAGE to the SIMPLE LOCAL and EXPLICIT, is DROPPING OUT the LESS SIMPLE ALL-INCLUDING, ALL-CONNECTING, NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT “TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM”, the wave-field base, and because WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE engineers this DROP OUT in its language based conceptualizing, the conceptualizations, (REDUCED FROM QUANTUM LOGIC NON-LOCAL and IMPLICIT to TO BINARY LOGIC LOCAL AND EXPLICIT)  are FRAGMENTING both WESTERN CULTURE INTELLECT and BEHAVIOUR.

* * *  

 

(more…)