WESTERN CULTURE DOES NOT CHANGE WITH CHANGE OF LEADERSHIP

 

Forward:  The U.S. Presidential election of 2020 has been strongly polarized between the candidate of the conservatives/Republicans and the candidate of the liberals (Democrats).  While this polarization vaguely follows the division of RIGHT and LIEFT  as it has come to be known by terminology in French politics from the summer of 1789 when members of the French National Assembly met to begin drafting a constitution. The delegates were deeply divided over the issue of how much authority King Louis XVI should have, and as the debate raged, the two main factions each staked out territory in the assembly hall. The anti-royalist revolutionaries seated themselves to the presiding officer’s left, while the more conservative, aristocratic supporters of the monarchy gathered to the right.

The focus of this note is that the Conservative/Republican and Liberal/Democrat polarization arises from a conceptual ambiguity wherein the Conservative – Liberal split is not only a false dichotomy, but the tip of the iceberg in the confusing of understanding that derives from a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, as discussed in this note.

  * * *

 

The U.S. and WESTERN ‘SOCIAL OPERATING SYSTEM is based on BINARY LOGIC which is reductive and simplistic and when used to interpret and address complex realities, is the source of dysfunction, including the binary bipolar political splitting into the polarized conservative and liberal factions.   This polarization is based on the false initial premise of LOCAL SOURCING of actions and developments deriving from a DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR (Nietzsche).

PRIDE (swollen EGO) as well as RECOGNITION/FAME derive from the DOUBLE ERROR based LOCAL SOURCING of actions and developments.

SHAME (deflated EGO) as well as DEFAMATION/INFAMOUS, derive from the DOUBLE ERROR of LOCAL SOURCING of actions and developments.

REALITY does not support the abstract concept of LOCAL SOURCING which comes from the DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR, but supports, instead, relational transformation.

Modern physics REAFFIRMS the REALITY of relational transformation and REJECTS the DOUBLE ERROR based abstraction of LOCAL SOURCING.

WHAT’S THIS GOT TO DO WITH THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION?

(more…)