PREFACE:  I am adding a few follow-up “NOTES on  Martine’s Integral Adventure as background to try to get around THE LIMITATIONS OF LANGUAGE, because in this case, the “STORY” is about the SHIFT from this general type of language I am right now using, which is a DIFFERENTIATION based language (as all the European language are) where we fragment things as in ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which “DIFFERENTIATES OUT” a notional “BEING-BASED THING-IN-ITSELF” called ‘THE TOWN”, … to an INTEGRATION based language that speaks in terms of “TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”, as is the architecture of Indigenous aboriginal languages, which gives a foundational role to INTEGRATIVE CONTEXT as in ‘THERE IS TOWNING IN THE TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE”.

In the INTEGRATION based language architecture of the indigenous aboriginals, we LET GO OF THE LOCAL AND EXPLICIT because this DIFFERENTIATION based FRAGMENTING approach to constructing REPRESENTATIONS of our sense-experience reality is TOO LIMITING and involves DROPOUT of information essential to the INTEGRATING of BOTH CONTENT (MALE-ASSERTING) and CONTAINER (FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING).  For example, INTEGRATION captures the relations between the male asserting “TOWNING” which is conjoined with the female-accommodating “VALLEY”.  This is the QUANTUM LOGIC view where, as stones are pulled from valley, DEEPENING the valley, the TOWN as a collective of STONE CONSTRUCTIONS is RISING UP, so that what is REALLY going on is the TRANSFORMING of the LANDSCAPE which is the ANDROGYNOUS union of FEMALE ACCOMMODATING deepening of the valley and the MALE ASSERTING growth of the TOWNING.

NOTA BENE:  Languages such as English and the Common Average European family of languages (Whorf’s classification) employ DIFFERENTIATION to SELECT THE MALE ASSERTING CONJUGATE; i.e. the “GROWING TOWN” and simply IGNORE the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING VALLEY HOLE produced by the extraction of materials, and this IGNORING or “IGNORANCE” sets up a SUBSTITUTE REALITY where GROWTH (and NOT “TRANSFORMATION”) is the language based pseudo-reality.   This is just “our” WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE DESIGN, which appeals because of ITS GREATER SIMPLICITY thanks to the DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE CONJUGATE of INTEGRATION (the common valley in which the towns are included) from our ANDROGYNOUS (INTEGRATING wave-trough-valley-DIFFERENTING wave-peak-town) co-comprising WAVE-FIELD REALITY, means that what our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is dealing with (only the MALE aspect) is NO LONGER CONSISTENT WITH OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY but is now the basis for a SIMPLIFIED, ONE-SIDED, MALE-ASSERTING ONLY ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY’ which nevertheless ‘WORKS’ for communications purposes since all of the users of this language are MAKING THE SAME MISTAKE in dropping out the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE

Since everyone is using the ‘short-cut’ involved in saying ‘the TOWN is GROWING’ which drops out the reality that the building materials for the town are extracted from the VALLEY so that what is REALLY going on as affirmed by our SENSE-EXPERIENCE as opposed to our language-based abstract constructions, is TRANFORMATION.

My point about THIS ENGLISH LANGUAGE I AM USING is that in our customary (standard) use of this type of language, WE DROP OUT THE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE to SIMPLIFY our task of constructing language based representations, and even though we are right now DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE, which makes our language based representations VERY UN-REALISTIC, this still ‘works’ for the COMMUNICATING and SHARING of what is now a DUMBED DOWN MALE-ASSERTING ONLY (SUBSTITUTE-) REALITY REPRESENTATION where can speak of the ‘GROWTH OF THE TOWN’ without mentioning the conjugate SHRINKAGE of the VALLEY due to the extraction of materials employed in the construction of the TOWN (i.e. there is a material balance here which is ignored because we quietly assume we are lining in a FLAT SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT rather than in the space on surface of SPHERE).  I am not suggesting that we do this CONSCIOUSLY, but I am suggesting that this is the implication of our DROPPING OUT of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE and SPEAKING AS IF WE WERE LIVING IN A FLAT SPACE OF INFINITE EXTENT where there is no FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE so that WE DO NOT HAVE TO ACCOUNT FOR THE REALITY THAT OUR EXTRACTION OF MATERIALS IS ACTUALLY TRANSFORMING THE SPHERICAL PLENUM (aka the WAVE-FIELD) WE ARE INCLUDED IN.

SUFFICE IT TO SAY that the language we are now using, i.e. this WESTERN CULTURE brand of language with its one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY reality-constructing architecture, is DROPPING OUT the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD CONJUGATE, the price we pay for putting our intellectually constructed SUBSTITUTE REALITY into the ONE-SIDED MALE ASSERTING ONLY ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY”.  EXAMPLE, we now use language like ‘the TOWN is GROWING’, a one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY BINARY LOGIC PROPOSITION based on INTELLECTUAL DIFFERENTATION that separates the TOWNING from the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE, … UNLIKE the indigenous aboriginal and Modern physics flow-based languages which fashion the equivalent of ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which retains the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE and thus supports FULL ANDROGYNOUS FEMALE-ACCOMMODATING-MALE ASSERTING ‘WAVE-FIELD’ REALITY.

This longish PREFACE will be SOON FORGOTTEN as we continue reading because we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS are now PSYCHOLOGICALLY HABITUATED TO THE DROP OUT, IN LANGUAGE of the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING CONJUGATE which means that we are ‘used to’ working within the LANGUAGE-STIMULATED MENTAL IMAGERY that associates with a LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION based SUBSTITUTE REALITY where we believe that WE CAN SEE THE TOWN GROWING, even though this is NOT REAL but a language-stimulated abstraction obtained by DIFFERENTIATING OUT THE FIGURE FROM THE GROUND, the TOWNING from the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE and setting it down, notionally, in an absolute empty and infinite space where we can INSPECT IT AS IF IT EXISTS A SEPARATE LOCAL, EXPLICIT BEING based THING-IN-ITSELF, that we could extract from its innate inclusion in the transforming relational continuum, in the manner we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS can pick up a grasshopper, ignoring our and ‘its’ inclusion in the transforming relational continuum, and using DIFFERENTIATION as it we pull off its legs and wings to develop a mechanical understanding of that which, in reality, is like us, a CONDENSATION of the all-including transforming relational continuum aka WAVE-FIELD, understandable in terms of INTEGRATION, which is an understanding we BYPASS by employing DIFFERENTIATION, as we do with the grasshopper, first extracting the material form from its INTEGRATION within the overall ‘ecosystem’ or WAVE-FIELD, and then ‘getting to know it’ by breaking it down into a collection of material components as if it were a LOCAL, INDEPENDENT MACHINE, rather than a CONDENSATION of the ALL_INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD.

WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is something we have ARCHITECTED on this abstract basis of BINARY LOGIC based DIFFERENTIATION, whereas INDIGENOUS ABORIGINAL LANGUAGE is consistent with Modern physics is acknowledging the need for an INTEGRATION based language which gives understanding in the QUANTUM LOGIC terms of CONDENSATIONS in the all-including WAVE-FIELD.

Now that we have discussed HOW SCREWED UP A DIFFERENTIATION BASED LANGUAGE IS, we can proceed with our DIFFERENTIATING LANGUAGE based ESSAY, because circumstances have put me and any potential readership, into this mode using a DUMBED-DOWN and PROBLEMATIC LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE for our communications.

One might ask me how I am, or if I am, going to avoid the booby-traps in this language I am using which DUMPS DOWN the communication to UNREALISTIC one-sided MALE-ASSERTING ONLY constructions.

My answer is that this language IS CAPABLE of POINTING TO ITS OWN SHORTCOMINGS as in the sentence; ‘This language I am right now using has us saying stuff like ‘The TOWN is GROWING, DEVELOPING and PRODUCING’ which is all one-sided MALE ASSERTING ACTION based when the task of using language to represent experiences from our sense-experience reality, needs be using language such as ‘there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’ which incorporates both FEMALE ACCOMMODATING in conjugate relation with MALE ASSERTING as in the WAVE-FIELD nature of our sense-experience reality.

THERE, I WAS ABLE TO USE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TO CONVEY THE LESS SIMPLE BUT MORE COMPLETE QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE-EXPERIENCE CONSISTENT REPRESENTATION OF ‘REALITY’ (I am keeping ‘reality’ in quotes because, as Korzybski might have said, “The linguistic representation is not the sense-experience reality).

SO, WHAT DOES THIS SAY ABOUT THE SHORTFALLS OF OUR ENGLISH LANGUAGE VIS A VIS CONSTRUCTING REPRESENTATIONS OF OUR SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY?

If we reflect on it for a moment, we will see that the BIG WRENCH IN THE WORKS is our WESTERN CULTURE use, in our language based constructions of a go-by SUBSTITUTE REALITY, of the abstract concept of BEING that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS ‘CREATE’ with ‘NAMING’.  NAMING invents LOCAL INDEPENDENT “BEING” THINGS_IN-THEMSELVES that we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS USE TO LINGUISTICALLY ‘FRAGMENT’ REALITY by ‘DIFFERENTIATING’ and thus ‘SEPARATING OUT’ relational forms in the transforming relational continuum

and from there, inventing our own constructions of reality on the abstract based of animating the NAMING INSTANTIATED BEING-THINGS that we have used language based DIFFERENTIATION to ‘NOTIONALLY SPLIT OUT’ of the transforming relational continuum aka the WAVE-FIELD, and USE THESE LINGUISTIC ABSTRACTION BASED “INDEPENDENT BEINGS”, re-animating them with GRAMMAR in LANGUAGE, to construct a BEING-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY REPRESENTATION.

SUCCESS!  WE HAVE USED OUR FRAGMENTION BASED LANGUAGE; i.e. our DIFFERENTIATION BASED LANGUAGE, to CONSTRUCT GRAMMAR ANIMATED FRAGMENT BASED REPRESENTATIONS AS BEHAVIOUR GUIDING ‘GO-BYS’.  The DOWNSIDE is that in the real world of our sense-experience, all material forms are CONDENSATIONS of an all-including WAVE-FIELD in which case COORDINATION of the apparent FRAGMENTS is assured because THEY ARE NOT, IN SENSE-EXPERIENCE REALITY, ‘FRAGMENT’ but are instead ‘CONDENSATIONS’ of the all-including WAVE-FIELD aka the transforming relational continuum.

DANGER!  Our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE, by its IMPUTING OF ‘BEING’ to relational forms in the flow, is creating a FRAGMENTED ‘SUBSTITUTE REALITY” featuring notional INDEPENDENT MATERIAL BODIES in ABSOLUTE EMPTY AND INFINITE SPACE (GOODBYE FEMALE ACCOMMODATING WAVE-FIELD).   THE CONNECTING SUBSTANCE OF THE ALL-INCLUDING WAVE-FIELD IS THUS REMOVES FROM OUR WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE ARCHITECTURE AND WE ARE LEFT WITH AN ASSORTMENT OF NAMING-INSTANTIATED ‘BEING’ BASED ABSTRACTIONS WHOSE MOVEMENTS AND INTERACTIONS “WE MUST INVENT” USING THE ‘DOUBLE ERROR’ COMBINATION OF ‘NAMING AND GRAMMAR’ SO AS TO CONSTRUCT A USABLE BINARY LOGIC (MATTER AND EMPTY SPACE BASED) SUBSTITUTE REALITY, FOR LINGUISTIC SHARING PURPOSES.  Of course, what we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS have as our language based sharing capability, is a capability for sharing BINARY LOGIC based SUBSTITUTE REALITIES, which we have built from DIFFERENTIATING OUT the relational forms in the transforming relational continuum.

So, let’s take another look at the SHORTFALL in our ENGLISH LANGUAGE.  It seems as if THE SHORTFALL IS NOT INTRINSIC IN THE LANGUAGE PER SE, but is coming from how we use the language, as in our assigning a foundational role to words imputing BEING.

“Nothing indeed has exercised a more simple power of persuasion hitherto than the error of Being, as it was formulated by the Eleatics for instance: in its favour are every word and every sentence that we utter!—Even the opponents of the Eleatics succumbed to the seductive powers of their concept of Being. Among others there was Democritus in his discovery of the atom. “Reason” in language!—oh what a deceptive old witch it has been! I fear we shall never be rid of God, so long as we still believe in grammar.”

 

The problem, as Nietzsche points out is BEING-based REASONING.  The introducing of BEING in language is intrinsically FRAGMENTING. It introduces BINARY LOGIC via the ABSTRACTIONS of MATTER and SPACE and over-rides the innate fluidity of the all-including WAVE-FIELD dynamic that is foundational in “NATURE ”

So the problem is not our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGES PER SE, but HOW WE USE OUR LANGUAGE and more specifically, our problem is our use of language to REASON’ which gives a FOUNDATIONAL ROLE to the abstraction of BEING which sets up the BINARY LOGIC ABSTRACTION of “EITHER” is “OR” is not’ which is TOO SIMPLE to adequately capture the QUANTUM LOGIC BOTH/AND structure of the transforming relational continuum wherein MATERIAL FORMS CONDENSATIONS of the all-including WAVE-FIELD so that the CONDENSATIONS are BOTH THEMSELVES AND AT THE SAME TIME THE WAVE-FIELD THEY ARE INCLUDED IN.

It is clear that our WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE … DROPS OUT A LOT, … by its BUILT-IN BINARY LOGIC FOUNDATION using the abstract concept of BEING which lets us FRAGMENT REALITY in our LANGUAGE BASED REPRESENTATION SCHEME, by equipping ourselves with what is really the tool of DIFFERENTIATION which lets us, notionally, EXTRACT from the transforming relational continuum, a dynamic that is NONLOCAL and IMPLICIT as everything is in flux, a selection of FIGURES seen NOT AS WHORLS IN FLOW but at as LOCAL BEINGS thanks to the powers of LINGUISTIC DIFFERENTIATION where we extract ‘the TOWN that is GROWING’ from our starting sense-experience impression that there is TOWNING in the TRANSFORMING LANDSCAPE’.

While there is some REDUNDANCY in these above words, the point that is intended is that WESTERN CULTURE LANGUAGE is based on DIFFERENTIATION which DROPS OUT the relational connections that are retained in an INTEGRATION based language architecture.  DIFFERENTIATION brings with it the BINARY LOGIC based ABSTRACTION of MATERIAL BEINGS, the ‘existence’ of which are determined by the simple “EITHER” is “OR” is not ‘reasoning’ test.

Once we have invented BEINGS by DIFFERENTIATING the relational continuum, and are using BEINGS in a foundational role in architecting our language based representation scheme, GRAMMAR is needed to construct a SYNTHETIC MATERIAL REALITY based on the actions and developments of the invented BEINGS.  This DIFFERENTIATION based DOUBLE ERROR of NAMING and GRAMMAR based construction of a LOCAL AUTHORING a based LINGUISTIC SUBSTITUTE REALITY, while it supports interpersonal communications, does so at the price of POPULARIZING synthetic SUBSTITUTE REALITIES that are FRAGMENTATION BASED.  As Bohm points out, this is NOT ONLY serving up language-based FRAGMENTED VIEWS of the WORLD, it is FRAGMENTING our understanding of OURSELVES bringing on, as a WESTERN CULTURE INBUILT EXPOSURE, SCHIZOPHRENIA and PARANOIA.

 

BOTTOM LINE: We live in a world of pervasive INTEGRATION characteristic of the transforming relational continuum (WAVE-FIELD) while we WESTERN CULTURE ADHERENTS put together language based SUBSTITUTE REALITY representations making it APPEAR as if we were living in a DIFFERENTIATED world of INDEPENDENT MATERIAL OBJECTS IN EMPTY SPACE.

 

Martine experienced what it is like to come to the understanding, through her ‘systems sciences’ investigations, of arriving at an understanding that cannot simply be shared as “A NEW PIECE OF UNDERSTANDING” that the recipient can ADD to their COLLECTION OF SUCH UNDERSTANDINGS, but in order to be able to assimilate this NEW UNDERSTANDING, must (A) construct a new and more comprehensive QUANTUM LOGIC CAPABLE STORAGE FACILITY, and (B) REVISE one’s ENTIRE EXISTING BINARY LOGIC based INVENTORY OF UNDERSTANDINGS to the new (QUANTUM LOGIC) STANDARD.  As individuals, we CAN do this, but it involves giving up whatever STATUS we may have as LIVING EXPERTS in the DUMBED DOWN WORLD OF BINARY LOGIC-BASED SUBSTITUTE REALITY, meaning, EXPERTS that enjoy WESTERN CULTURE recognition and rewarding for EXPERT STATUS, and as a result, our COLLECTIVE UNDERSTANDING progresses, as Max Planck suggested, “with the death of EXPERTS”. 

 

WESTERN CULTURE EXPERTS are predominantly BINARY LOGIC ADEPT EXPERTS who have the ability to consistently come up with the BEST ANSWERS, … ALBEIT WITHIN THE NARROW CONTEXT of Goedel’s Theorem, of the INCOMPLETENESS of all finite systems of BINARY LOGIC. The farmer who manages to cultivate more crops and produce more output than his peers is part of a system that REWARDS and RECOGNIZES on the basis of MALE ASSERTING ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENT, … BUT THIS BINARY LOGIC ASSESSMENT is BLIND to the FEMALE ACCOMMODATING SHRINKAGE OF WILDERNESS and thus BLIND to the QUANTUM LOGIC REALITY of INCLUSION in an ALL-INCLUDING TRANSFORMING RELATIONAL CONTINUUM AKA “WAVE-FIELD”.  Our COLLECTIVE UNDERSTANDING in a QUANTUM LOGIC SENSE will thus progress with the death of BINARY LOGIC EXPERTS.

 

* * * end-of-preface * * *

(more…)